The present invention relates to conveyor belt pulleys, and more particularly to self cleaning wing pulleys that are suited for bulk material handling applications. In these applications, material can stick to or become entrapped behind the conveyor belt. When material is behind the conveyor belt, it is considered debris that must be displaced from the system for optimum conveyor belt traction and belt life.
The use of conventional wing pulleys in belt conveyor applications is a well-known practice which is used for a wide variety of bulk materials. The conventional wing pulley can range from 3.5″ in diameter up to 60″ (and larger) in diameter, and from 4″ in length to 100″ (and longer) in length. Each pulley is constructed from material and thicknesses that are appropriate for the size and rigor of the final application.
The conventional wing pulley design utilizes full length straight wings mated to set of hubs that define the central rotating axis for the pulley. The design and manufacture of the conventional wing pulley is guided by ANSI/CEMA (American National Standards Institute/Conveyor Equipment Manufacturing Association) 501.1-2003(R2009) Specifications for Welded Steel Wing Pulleys.
The conventional wing pulley, while generally considered an ideal self cleaning pulley, has been found to have limitations. When used in bulk material handling applications, the conventional wing pulley does in fact break material loose from the back side of the belt through the impact of the wing on the belt, but the material falls between the wings of the pulley and is re-circulated between the belt and pulley multiple times before being cleared from the system.
The straight wing by design generates a high level of noise. As the straight wings of the conventional pulley come in contact with the moving conveyor belt the impact of the full length wing hitting the belt at single impact creates a slapping sound. Additionally, in conveyor systems handling large belts and material loads, the straight wing pulley has been known to fail due to the straight wing design. As loads are increased, the wings have a tendency to fold over; this is due in part to limited strength of the wings when perpendicularly aligned to the direction belt travel.
Although there is an existing and enduring demand for straight wing pulleys, there remains a need for a formed wing pulley that provide more aggressive belt and debris cleaning capability while providing quieter operation in bulk material handling applications.
The present invention provides a formed wing pulley configured with formed (for example, trapezoidal shaped) wings that provide the belt beating benefits of a traditional straight wing pulley and a formed wing that maximizes the displacement of debris which has a tendency to become entrapped between the belt and pulley. The formed wing is also stronger and operates more quietly than the straight wing pulley design.
In various embodiments, the formed wing pulley may include one or more of the following and other unique features:
1. Polygon Core.
The positive placement polygon core may be mated to a set of hubs that are designed for pulley applications. This polygon core serves as the rigid cyclic equilateral polygon substructure for the pulley and aligns the hubs. The inner surfaces of the polygon core contact the outer diameter of the hubs. The size of the polygon core can be increased or decreased through the use of smaller and larger hubs. With the positive placement polygon core, a symmetrical and repetitive set of surfaces is created for mating the pulley wings. The formed wings of the pulley are manufactured with a bottom edge profile that only allows each wing to be properly fitted on the polygon core by contacting multiple surfaces. In embodiments where the radial wing angles are varied, offset or staggered, multiple bottom wing profiles are used.
2. End Disks.
In embodiments where the outside diameter of the pulley creates a condition where the pulley wings exceed the desired wing height in an upright position, end disks may be used to strengthen and lighten the pulley by moving the polygon core outward, effectively reducing the overall pulley wing height and weight. Optimizing wing height reduces the opportunity for pulley failure due to wing fold over and increases the overall strength of the wing pulley. These end disks are mated to the hubs increasing the diameter of the polygon core. The polygon core at this greater size maintains the cyclic equilateral polygon shape and positive placement feature of the direct to hub style polygon core.
3. Formed (Trapezoidal Shaped) Wings.
The formed (trapezoidal shaped) wing has a flat straight section of wing parallel to the shaft and axis of rotation. The wings then angle back from the straight section of the wing at an angle defined as a function of the pulley's overall length, polygon core diameter, and outside diameter. Any variation in any of these lengths will change the angle of the wing relative to the straight section at or near the center of the wing. The wing can be symmetrical or asymmetrical about a center plane perpendicular to the rotational axis dependent on application. While the wing shape of this embodiment is depicted as trapezoidal, other combinations of angles and curves can be formed for positive placement on the polygon core. The shape of the formed wing by design provides the belt beating benefits of a straight wing pulley, but improves upon the design by adding belt support, advanced cleaning, self gusseting, and sound dampening features through the incorporation of the angled portion of the wing.
4. Wing Tips.
Wing tips for the formed wing pulley can be constructed form a variety of material shapes that may include round, rectangular, hex, and half round. In some embodiments, no wing tips will be installed; the top surface of the wing will serve as the contact surface with the conveyor belt. Wing tips can be constructed of one or multiple pieces that follow the profile of the wing. The wing tips are attached to the top profile of the wing and provide a wear surface that is greater than the width of the pulley wing.
5. Clean-Out Ports.
In one embodiment, clean-out ports are included in the body of the wing to provide a means to accelerate the rate at which debris is displaced when the pulley is in use. Clean-out ports are sections of the wing that have been removed to allow material to move between wing openings. These clean-out ports can be made from any combination of shapes and sizes, and can be made in the outer/inner profile or main body of any combination of wings. The clean-out ports allow small material to pass from one opening of the wing into the next when the pulley is in use. This allows material that could have a tendency to become trapped between the belt and wings of a conventional straight wing pulley a means to pass into the next wing opening, and be deflected outward at an accelerated rate. In other embodiments, the wing body is solid without clean-out ports, or the cleanout ports can be in multiple locations on multiple wings.
FIG. 1—Isometric view of a formed wing pulley.
FIG. 2—Isometric view of the positive placement polygon core with hubs.
FIG. 3—Isometric view of a positive placement polygon core with end disks for large diameter pulleys.
FIG. 4—Top view of a formed (trapezoidal shaped) wing.
FIG. 5—Front view of a formed (trapezoidal shaped) wing with clean-out ports.
FIG. 6—Isometric view of a single formed wing placed on the positive placement polygon core.
FIG. 7—End view of a single formed wing placed on the positive placement polygon core.
FIG. 8—End view of two alternating wing profiles that increase the number of wing on the polygon core—multiple wings that fit multiple ways.
FIG. 9—End view of all wings placed on a positive placement polygon core.
FIG. 10—Isometric view of a formed wing pulley without Clean-out Ports.
The formed wing pulley in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention is shown in
Referring now to the embodiment of
In one embodiment depicted in
The polygon core (2) of the pulley (1) is shown in
To maintain an optimum wing height that minimizes the risk of wing fold over for the formed wing pulley, the size of the polygon core (2) can be increased or decreased in size through the use of different size hubs (8) or end disks (9).
The wings (3) of the formed wing pulley (1) can be constructed in essentially any combination of bends and curves that will perform the desired function(s), such as assist in accelerating debris outward as the pulley (1) rotates. The formed wing (3) of the pulley (1) can be cast, extruded, forged, bent, cut, and/or rolled from plates and shapes of ferrous or non-ferrous metals, plastics or composites to produce the required formed wing (3) shape and features. In the embodiment of
The front view of a formed wing (3) designed to fit onto a polygon core (2) is depicted in
The wing tips (4,5,6) may be permanently attached to the wing (3) through stitch or continuous weld, glue, bonding, or mechanical fastening techniques.
In some instances, for example, where the number of wings (3) required for the pulley exceeds the number of sides of the polygon core (2), multiple profiles (10,11) can be formed into the lower edge of the wing (3), as depicted in
With all formed wings (3) assembled to the positive placement polygon core (2), the wings can provide 100% radial coverage at the outside diameter of the pulley (1). This can be seen in
The above description is that of the preferred embodiments of the invention. Various alterations and changes can be made without departing from the spirit and broader aspect of the invention as defined in the appended claims, which are to be interpreted in accordance with the principles of patent law including the doctrine of equivalents. Any reference to claim elements in the singular, for example, using the articles “a,” “an,” “the” or “said” is not to be construed as limiting the element to the singular.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1335421 | Black | Mar 1920 | A |
1980777 | Zollinger | Nov 1934 | A |
3038590 | Arndt | Jun 1962 | A |
3046805 | Van Gorp | Jul 1962 | A |
3055229 | Mecham | Sep 1962 | A |
3354735 | Holz | Nov 1967 | A |
3812562 | Lovett | May 1974 | A |
3995487 | Locke | Dec 1976 | A |
4180155 | Stevick | Dec 1979 | A |
4233853 | Holz | Nov 1980 | A |
4284409 | Van Teslaar | Aug 1981 | A |
4643294 | Whited | Feb 1987 | A |
4718544 | Herren | Jan 1988 | A |
4956914 | Valster et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
4984363 | Valster et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
5109976 | Mohri et al. | May 1992 | A |
5190146 | Valster et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5205796 | Valster et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5209704 | Valster et al. | May 1993 | A |
6938754 | Kanaris | Sep 2005 | B2 |
7070042 | Dow et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7527142 | Zeltwanger et al. | May 2009 | B1 |
8579774 | Derscheid | Nov 2013 | B2 |
20110315517 | Laughlin | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120186945 | Laughlin | Jul 2012 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
CEMA Standard 501.1, Specification for Welded Steel Wing Pulleys, Conveyor Equipment Manufacturers Association, ANSI/CEMA 501.1-2003 (2009). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130341162 A1 | Dec 2013 | US |