FORMING DIENES FROM CYCLIC ETHERS AND DIOLS, INCLUDING TETRAHYDROFURAN AND 2-METHYL-1,4-BUTANEDIOL

Abstract
Forming a diene includes contacting a reactant including at least one of a cyclic ether and a diol with a heterogeneous acid catalyst to yield a reaction mixture including a diene. The heterogeneous acid catalyst includes at least one of a Lewis acid catalyst, a supported Lewis-acid catalyst, a Brnsted acid catalyst, a solid acid catalyst, a supported phosphoric acid catalyst, and a sulfonated catalyst. The dehydration of cyclic ethers and diols with high selectivity to yield dienes completes pathways for the production of dienes, such as isoprene and butadiene, from biomass in high yields, thereby promoting economical production of dienes from renewable resources.
Description
BACKGROUND

Some dienes, such as butadiene and isoprene, are used to produce rubbery polymers (e.g., for use in car tires). These dienes are commonly produced from the cracking of naptha and other petroleum-derived precursors. Although these dienes can be produced from renewable resources such as bio-based feedstocks, yields are generally low, making these processes cost prohibitive. In one example, depicted in Scheme 1, furfural can be formed from xylose, a readily available biomass-derived platform molecule. Furfural can then be converted to furan through decarbonylation, followed by hydrogenation to yield tetrahydrofuran. Dehydra-decyclization of tetrahydrofuran yields butadiene, completing the pathway for the production of butadiene from biomass.




embedded image


Synthetic methods with improved diene yields would make production of dienes from renewable resources economically feasible.


SUMMARY

In a general aspect, forming a diene includes contacting a reactant with a heterogeneous acid catalyst to yield a reaction mixture including a diene, where the reactant includes a cyclic ether or a diol. The heterogeneous acid catalyst includes at least one of a Lewis acid catalyst, a solid Lewis-acid catalyst, a Brønsted acid catalyst, a solid acid catalyst, a supported phosphoric acid catalyst, and a sulfonated catalyst.


Implementations of the general aspect may include one or more of the following features.


The reactant may be derived from biomass. When the reactant is a cyclic ether, the cyclic ether may have tetrahydrofuran skeleton. In some embodiments, the cyclic either is tetrahydrofuran, and the diene is butadiene. A selectivity of the butadiene is typically at least 95%. In some embodiments, the cyclic ether is 2-methyltetrahydrofuran, and the diene is pentadiene. A selectivity of the pentadiene is typically at least 95%. In some embodiments, the cyclic ether is 2,5-dimethyl tetrahydrofuran and the diene is hexadiene. A selectivity of the hexadiene is typically at least 90%. In some embodiments, the cyclic ether is 3-methyltetrahydrofuran, and the diene is isoprene. A selectivity of the isoprene is typically at least 65%. When the cyclic ether is 3-methyltetrahydrofuran, forming the diene may include processing biomass to yield citric acid, itaconic acid, or mesaconic acid, and processing the citric acid, itaconic acid, or mesaconic acid to yield the 3-methyltetrahydrofuran. That is, the 3-methyltetrahydrofuran may be formed from at least one of citric acid, itaconic acid, and mesaconic acid derived from biomass. When the reactant is a diol, the diol may be 2-methyl-1,4-butanediol, and the diene is isoprene. A selectivity of the isoprene is typically at least 70%.


In some implementations, the contacting occurs at a temperature from 100° C. to 600° C., 150° C. to 400° C., 100° C. to 500° C., or 200° C. to 300° C. The contacting may occur at a pressure from 0 psia to 500 psia (34 atm), at a pressure up to 147 psia (10 atm), at pressure from 1 atm to 10 atm, or from 1 atm to 2 atm. In some cases, the contacting occurs in the presence of an inert gas, such as He, Ar, and N2. In certain cases, the contacting occurs in the vapor phase. Some implementations may include separating the diene from the reaction mixture. The reaction mixture may include unreacted cyclic ether, unreacted diol, or both, and the unreacted cyclic ether, unreacted diol, or both may be contacted with the heterogeneous acid catalyst to yield the diene.


In some implementations, the heterogeneous acid catalyst includes a Lewis acid catalyst, and the Lewis acid catalyst includes at least one of AlCl3, TiCl4, FeCl3, BF3, SnCl4, ZnCl2, ZnBr2, AMBERLYST-70, SiO2, Nb2O5, MgO, TiO2, SiO2—Al2O3, CeO2, and Cr2O3.


In some implementations, the heterogeneous acid catalyst includes a Brønsted acid catalyst, and the Brønsted acid catalyst includes at least one of HCl, HBr, HI, HClO4, HClO3, HNO3, H2SO4, CH3COOH, CF3COOH, and H3PO4.


In some implementations, the heterogeneous acid catalyst includes a solid acid catalyst, and the solid acid catalyst includes at least one of a zeolite type catalyst, a substituted-zeolite type catalyst, a heteropolyacid type catalyst, a phosphate type catalyst, a zirconia type catalyst, a celite type catalyst, a metal organic framework type catalyst, a carbon type catalyst, and a sulfonic acid catalyst. Suitable zeolite type catalysts include H-ZSM-5, H-BEA, H-Y, mordenite, ferrierite, chabazite, and self-pillared pentasil. The self-pillared pentasil typically has an average pore size of at least 5 A. Suitable phosphorus-containing zeolite type catalysts include phosphorus-containing MFI, phosphorus-containing MEL, phosphorus-containing BEA, phosphorus-containing FAU, phosphorus-containing MOR, phosphorus-containing FER, phosphorus-containing CHA, and phosphorus-containing self-pillared pentasil. The phosphorus-containing self-pillared pentasil has a ratio of silicon atoms to phosphorus atoms in a range of 1:1 to 1000:1 or 3:1 to 150:1. The phosphorus-containing self-pillared pentasil has rotational intergrowths of single-unit-cell lamellae that lead to repetitive branching nanosheets. The nanosheets have a thickness of about 2 nm and define a network of micropores having a diameter of about 0.5 nm. The phosphorus-containing self-pillared pentasil has a house of cards arrangement defining a network of mesopores having a dimension in a range of 2 nm to 7 nm. The phosphorus-containing zeolite type catalyst is substantially free of aluminum. That is, the phosphorus-containing zeolite type catalyst may include less than 5 wt %, less than 4 wt %, less than 3 wt %, less than 2 wt %, or less than 1 wt % of aluminum. Suitable substituted zeolite type catalyst include Sn, Ge, Ga, B, Ti, Fe, and Zr.


Suitable heteropolyacid type catalysts include H3PW12O40, H3SiW12O40, H5AlW12O40, H6CoW12O40, H3PMo12O40, H3SiMo12O40, and Cs+ substituted heteropolyacid type catalyst.


Suitable phosphate type catalysts include niobium phosphate (NbOPO4), zirconium phosphate (ZrO2—PO4), siliconiobium phosphate (Nb—P—Si—O), tricalcium phosphate (Ca3(PO4)2), lithium phosphate (Li3PO4), and lithium sodium phosphate (Li3NaP2O7).


Suitable zirconia type catalysts include SO3—ZrO2, SiO2—ZrO2, Zeolites-ZrO2, Al2O3—ZrO2, ZrO2, and WOx—ZrO2.


Suitable celite type catalysts include P-CELITE.


Suitable metal organic framework catalysts include MTh 101.


Suitable carbon type catalysts include activated carbon, sulfated carbon, and SO3H-functionalized carbon.


Suitable sulfonated catalysts include NAFION and AMBERLYST.


Advantages of processes described herein include dehydration of cyclic ethers and diols with high selectivity to yield dienes, there by completing pathways for the production of dienes, such as isoprene and butadiene, from biomass in high yields. These synthetic methods facilitate economical production of dienes from renewable resources.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 depicts a reaction diagram for the dehydration of 2-methyl-1,4-butanediol (MBDO) to isoprene at 200° C. and 1 atm. Intermediates in the dehydration reaction include 3-methyltetrahydrofuran (3-MTHF), 2-methyl-3-butene-1-ol, and 3-methyl-3-butene-1-ol (MBEO).



FIG. 2 shows a process scheme for the production of isoprene from MBDO with continuous recycling of 3-MTHF and MBDO.



FIG. 3 depicts of high throughput pulsed flow reactor (HTPFR).



FIG. 4 shows butadiene yield and selectivity formed by the dehydration of tetrahydrofuran (THF) for various catalysts.



FIG. 5 shows THF conversion and butadiene selectivity for various catalysts.



FIG. 6 shows isoprene yield and isoprene selectivity formed by the dehydration of MBDO various catalysts.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Disclosed herein are processes and methods for the dehydration of cyclic ethers and diols over heterogeneous acid catalysts to produce dienes. Examples of suitable cyclic ethers include furans (compounds with a tetrahydrofuran skeleton), including tetrahydrofuran (THF), 2-methyltetrahydrofuran (2-MTHF), 3-methyltetrahydrofuran (3-MTHF), and 2,5 dimethyltetrahydrofuran (2,5-DMTHF). Examples of suitable diols include butanediols, such as 2-methyl-1,4-butanediol (MBDO). The particular diene produced depends on the reactant (e.g., the cyclic ether or diol) and the reaction conditions (e.g., temperature or pressure). In some embodiments, dienes produced include 1,3-butadiene (“butadiene”), 2-methyl-1,3-butadiene (isoprene), pentadiene, and hexadiene.


One embodiment, depicted in Scheme 2, includes a process for the dehydra-decyclization of tetrahydrofuran (THF) over a heterogeneous acid catalyst to yield 1,3-butadiene and water. The THF may be obtained from any biomass-derived source, such as biomass-derived furan. This process, which completes the pathway for the production of butadiene from biomass depicted in Scheme 1, results in a high yield of 1,3-butadiene, with a selectivity of at least 95%.




embedded image


Another embodiment, depicted in Scheme 3, includes a process for the dehydration of 2-methyltetrahydrofuran (2-MTHF), which can be readily derived from biomass, over a heterogeneous acid catalyst to yield pentadiene with a selectivity of at least 95%.




embedded image


Yet another embodiment, depicted in Scheme 4, includes a process for the dehydration of 2,5 dimethyltetrahydrofuran (2,5-DMTHF), which can be readily derived from biomass, over a heterogeneous acid catalyst to yield hexadiene with a selectivity of at least 90%.




embedded image


Another embodiment, depicted in Scheme 5, includes a process for the dehydration of 3-methyltetrahydrofuran (3-MTHF), which can be readily derived from biomass, over a heterogeneous acid catalyst to yield isoprene. The selectivity to isoprene of this reaction is at least 65%.




embedded image


Still another embodiment, depicted in Scheme 6, includes a process for dehydration of 2-methyl-1,4-butanediol (MBDO), which can be readily derived from biomass, over a heterogeneous acid catalyst to yield isoprene with a selectivity of at least 70%. In some examples, MBDO is produced from biomass-derived citric acid, itaconic acid, or mesaconic acid. Thus, disclosed methods complete the pathway for the production of isoprene in high yields from biomass.




embedded image



FIG. 1 shows a calculated reaction energy diagram for MBDO dehydration. Isoprene is the thermodynamically preferred product at 200° C. and 1 atm pressure. At temperatures lower than 150° C., 3-MTHF becomes the preferred product. As such, greater selectivity for isoprene can be achieved at temperatures of at least about 150° C. The upper temperature limit (e.g., 400° C. or 600° C.) for producing isoprene is governed by bond-forming reactions of isoprene (e.g., Diels-Alder of two isoprene molecules to form limonene), coking reactions, and bond-breaking reactions, all of which may be favored at higher temperatures.


Dehydration reactions disclosed herein can be carried out with a variety of catalysts at a variety of temperatures, pressures, and space velocities (reactant volumetric flow rate per volume of catalyst). Suitable catalysts include acid catalysts, such as those listed in Table 1. In some embodiments, dehydration reactions described herein take place at an elevated temperature (relative to room temperature) over a heterogeneous acid catalyst. In certain embodiments, dienes can be produced from cyclic ethers or diols without adding water to the reaction, simplifying and reducing the cost of the process.









TABLE 1







Acid catalyst classes, types, and examples suitable for


dehydration of cyclic ethers and diols to yield dienes.









Class
Type
Example





Lewis Acid (L-
L-Acids
AlCl3, TiCl4, FeCl3, BF3, SnCl4,


Acid) Catalysts

ZnCl2, ZnBr2, Amberlyst-70



Solid L-Acids
SiO2, Al2O3, Nb2O5, MgO




TiO2, SiO2—Al2O3, CeO2, Cr2O3


BrØnsted Acid
B-Acids
HCl, HBr, HI, HClO4, HClO3,


(B-Acid)

HNO3, H2SO4, CH3COOH,


Catalysts

CF3COOH, H3PO4


Solid Acid
Zeolites (Z)
H-ZSM-5, H-BEA, H—Y,


Catalysts

Mordenite, Ferrierite, Chabazite,




Self-Pillared Pentasil (SPP),




phosphorus-containing zeolites (e.g.,




P-BEA, P-MFI)



Substituted Zeolites (Sub.)
Sn, Ge, Ti, Fe, Zr, P



Heteropolyacids (HPAs)
H3PW12O40, H5AlW12O40,




H6CoW12O40, H3SiW12O40,




H3PMo12O40, H3SiMo12O40




(Cs+ substituted HPAs)



Phosphates (PO43−)
Niobium phosphate (NbOPO4),




Zirconium phosphate (ZrO2—PO4),




Siliconiobium phosphate (Nb—P—Si—O)




Tricalcium phosphate (Ca3(PO4)2)




Lithium phosphate (Li3PO4)




Lithium sodium phosphate




(Li3NaP2O7)



Zirconias (ZrO2)
SO3—ZrO2, SiO2—ZrO2,




Zeolites-ZrO2, Al2O3—ZrO2,




ZrO2, WOx—ZrO2



Celite ®
P-Celite ®



Metal Organic Framework
Metal organic framework



(MOF)



Carbon (C)
Activated carbon, sulfated carbon




(SO3H-functionalized carbon)









Other suitable catalysts include a supported phosphoric acid catalysts.


Other suitable catalysts include self-pillared pentasil (SPP). Phosphorus-containing-self-pillared pentasil (P-SPP) is a silica-based, self-pillared, hierarchical (containing both micropore and mesopore) zeolitic material. In some embodiments, the ratio of silicon to phosphorus in suitable P-SPP catalysts is typically in a range of 1 to 5. In certain embodiments, the ratio of silicon to phosphorus in suitable P-SPP catalysts is 50 or less, 500 or less, or 1000 or less. Examples of ranges for the ratio of silicon to phosphorus in suitable P-SPP catalysts include 1 to 1000, 5 to 500, and 5 to 50 (e.g., 27). P—SPP can be synthesized by a direct hydrothermal method using tetrabutylphosponium hydroxide (TBPOH) as an organic structure directing agent, with TBPOH providing phosphorus for the P-SPP. The rotational intergrowths of single-unit-cell lamellae leads to repetitive branching nanosheets. The nanosheets can be about 2 nm thick and can contain a network of micropores having a diameter of about 0.5 nm. The house-of-cards arrangement of the nanosheets creates a network mesopores having a diameter in a range of about 2 nm to about 7 nm. As used herein, a micropore has a diameter of less than about 2 nm, and a mesopores has a diameter between about 2 nm and about 50 nm.


In some embodiments, other phosphorus-containing zeolites (“P-zeolites”) can be utilized to form dienes from cyclic ethers and diols. Suitable P-zeolites include, for example P-BEA, P-MFI and P-MEL, P-FAU, P-MOR, P-FER, P-CHA, and P-SPP. One example, P-BEA can be prepared by impregnating a zeolite having a BEA framework with phosphoric acid, as described in Fan W. et al. (2016) Renewable p-Xylene from 2,5-Dimethylfuran and Ethylene Using Phosphorus-containing Zeolite Catalysts. ChemCatChem (2016) (DOI: 10.1002/cctc.201601294). In some cases, suitable P-zeolites are free or substantially free of aluminum. A P-zeolite that is “substantially free” of aluminum can include, for example, less than 5 wt %, less than 4 wt %, less than 3 wt %, less than 2 wt %, or less than 1 wt % of aluminum.


In some embodiments, P-Celite® prepared by impregnating Celite® with phosphoric acid can be used to form dienes from cyclic ethers and diols. P-Celite® may be made according to Fan W., et al. (2016) Renewable p-Xylene from 2,5-Dimethylfuran and Ethylene Using Phosphorus-containing Zeolite Catalysts. ChemCatChem (2016) (DOI: 10.1002/cctc.201601294).


In some embodiments sulfonated (e.g., sulfonic acid) catalysts can be utilized. Suitable sulfonic acid catalysts (also referred to as sulfonate catalysts) include NAFION and AMBERLYST.


The dehydration of cyclic ethers and diols to yield dienes can be carried out using any appropriate temperature. In some embodiments, the reaction can be carried out in the vapor phase. In some embodiments, the reaction can be carried out at temperatures of not less than 100° C., not less than 150° C., or not less than 200° C. In some embodiments the reaction can be carried out at a temperature of not greater than 600° C., not greater than 500° C., not greater than 400° C., not greater than 350° C., or not greater than 300° C. In some embodiments, the reaction can be carried out at a temperature from 100° C. to 600° C., from 150° C. to 400° C., from 100° C. to 500° C., or from 200° C. to 300° C. For selective formation of isoprene from 3-MTHF, suitable temperatures are from 150° C. to 350° C.


The dehydration of cyclic ethers or diols can be carried out at any appropriate pressure. In some embodiments the reaction pressure can be not less than vacuum (0 psia) or not less than 1 atm. In some embodiments, the reaction pressure can be 10 atm or less, or 2 atm or less. In some embodiments, the reaction pressure can be from vacuum (0 psia) to 500 psia, or from 1 atm to 2 atm. Low pressures may yield selective formation of certain dienes, such as isoprene, due to favorable thermodynamic conditions. Thus, in some cases, pressures less than 10 atm may be selected.


The dehydration of cyclic ethers or diols can be carried out at any appropriate space velocity. In some embodiments, space velocity can be chosen to obtain single-pass conversion of the cyclic either or diol that is less than 100%. In some embodiments, space velocity can be chosen such that 100% conversion is obtained. In certain embodiments, space velocity can be considerably higher than that necessary to obtain 100% conversion of the cyclic ether or diol.


Dehydration reactions described herein may be carried out with or without an inert carrier gas (e.g., He, Ar, N2, etc.) added to or contacted with the cyclic ether or diol prior to the reactants entering a catalytic reactor with the catalyst.


Because the selectivity of the dehydration reactions disclosed herein to a particular diene may decrease with increasing conversion of the reactant (i.e., cyclic ether or diol), it may be useful to perform the process using a recycle stream of the reactant. In some embodiments, as depicted in FIG. 2, a reaction intermediate, such as 3-MTHF in the formation of isoprene from MBDO, may be recycled with the cyclic ether or diol.


In some embodiments, zeolites may be useful in the dehydration of cyclic ethers and diols to dienes (e.g., MBDO to isoprene). In particular, zeolites such as microporous aluminosilicates with pore sizes of not less than about 5 A, not less than about 4 A, or not less than about 3 A may promote diene formation over that of other products (e.g., isoprene formation over 3-MTHF) based on the size of the reactant and product molecules.


This disclosure is further illustrated by the following examples. The particular examples, materials, amounts, and procedures are to be interpreted broadly in accordance with the scope and spirit of the disclosure as set forth herein.


Examples
Dehydra-Decyclization of Tetrahydrofurans

The following catalysts were tested for THF dehydra-decyclization: CeO2 (Sigma Aldrich), H-ZSM-5 Zeolite (Zeolyst CBV28014 SiO2/Al2O3 ratio=280), H-Y Zeolite (Zeolyst CBV760, SiO2/Al2O3=60), H-BEA Zeolite (Zeolyst CBV811C-300 SiO2/Al2O3 ratio=360), tin-BEA Zeolite (Sn-BEA) (Chang C-C, Wang Z, Dornath P, Je Cho H, & Fan W (2012) Rapid synthesis of Sn-Beta for the isomerization of cellulosic sugars. RSC Advances 2(28):10475-10477), ZrO2 (Sigma Aldrich), phosphorous-self-pillared pentasil (P-SPP), phosphorous-celite (P-Celite) (Hong Je Cho, Limin Ren, Vivek Vattipalli, Yu-Hao Yeh, Nicholas Gould, Bingjun Xu, Raymond J. Gorte, Raul Lobo, Paul J. Dauenhauer, Michael Tsapatsis, and Wei Fan, Renewable p-Xylene from 2, 5-Dimethylfuran and Ethylene Using Phosphorus-Containing Zeolite Catalysts ChemCatChem 9 (3), 398-402, 2017) MgO (Alfa Aesar), tricalcium phosphate (TCP, Sigma Aldrich), SiO2—Al2O3(Sigma Aldrich), activated carbon (Sigma Aldrich), metal organic framework catalyst (MOF) (e.g., MIL 101), niobium oxide (Nb2O5, Sigma Aldrich), phosphotungstic acid (PTA, H3PW12O40). All catalysts were pressed, crushed, and sieved to a particle size of 0.5 to 1 mm. With the exception of MOF, all catalysts were pre-treated under flowing He at 400° C. for 1 h. MOF was pre-treated under flowing He at 150° C. for 1 h.


Dehydration reactions were performed in a high throughput pulsed flow reactor (HTPFR), such as HTPFR 100 depicted in FIG. 3. HTPFR 100 includes a glass reactor (i.e., inlet liner) 102 coupled to a gas chromatograph (Aglient 7890A) via conduit 104. Glass reactor 102 is packed with quartz wool 106 (7.5 mg and 15 mg) and catalyst 108 (5-200 mg). Carrier gas is provided to glass reactor 102 via inlet 110, and gas exits via split vent 112. Reactant is provided to HTPFR 100 through injection needle 114.


Experiments were performed at reaction temperatures of 200 to 400° C. The space velocity was controlled by adjusting the carrier gas (He, 99.999%) flow rate to the split vent. Space velocities of 10-89 s−1 were tested with the reactor, where space velocity is defined as follows:






S
=


space





velocity

=




F
He


V
C




[
=
]




min

-
1








where FHe is the flow rate of He through in sccm min−1 and VC is the volume of the catalyst bed. He pressure was kept constant at 30 psig. Each experiment was performed by injecting 1 uL of reactant (cyclic ether or diol) into the reactor followed by immediate separation and quantification of the products.


Reaction products were quantified by separating on a column (Agilent Plot-Q, 30 m, 0.32 mm ID, 20 μm film thickness; temperature program: 40° C. for 2 min, 10° C./min to 270° C., hold 10 min) and detecting with a Polyarc/FID. The Polyarc (Activated Research Company) allows for calibration-free quantitative analysis of hydrocarbons because the FID signal area is proportional to the moles of each compound. Diene selectivity is defined as the ratio of moles of C from the diene divided by the total moles of C from the diene plus the moles of C from all reaction by-products.







Diene





Selectivity

=


Diene




[

mol





C

]



Diene




[

mol





C

]

+


By

-

products




[

mol





C

]







Diene yield and reactant conversion are defined as follows:







Diene





Yield

=


Diene




[

mol





C

]




Reactant





and






Products




[

mol





C

]











Reactant





Conversion

=

1
-


Reactant




[

mol





C

]




Reactant





and






Products




[

mol





C

]









where Reactant and Products [mol C] refers to all reaction products including the diene and by-products as well as the reactant.



FIG. 4 shows a summary of the catalytic data obtained for dehydra-decyclization of THF with various catalysts. Detailed catalytic data for the dehydration of THF to butadiene over fifteen different catalysts are presented in Tables 2-16. Data for 2-methyltetrahydrofuran (2-MTHF) and 2,5-dimethyltetrahydrofuran (2,5-DMTHF) to butadiene are presented in Tables 17 and 18.









TABLE 2







Tetrahydrofuran dehydra-decyclization to butadiene using CeO2


Catalyst CeO2


Mass (mg) 100












Space





Temperature
Velocity
Butadiene
Butadiene
THF


(° C.)
(s−1)
Selectivity
Yield
Conversion





200
89
1.0000
0.0000
0.0000


200
10
0.5355
0.0001
0.0001


300
89
1.0000
0.0000
0.0000


300
10
0.6157
0.0000
0.0000


400
89
0.3613
0.0003
0.0008


400
10
0.4085
0.0004
0.0010
















TABLE 3







Tetrahydrofuran dehydra-decyclization to


butadiene using H-ZSM-5 zeolite


Catalyst H-ZSM-5


Mass (mg) 61.8












Space





Temperature
Velocity
Butadiene
Butadiene
THF


(° C.)
(s−1)
Selectivity
Yield
Conversion





200
89
0.8085
0.0209
0.0259


200
10
0.5603
0.0215
0.0383


300
89
0.4598
0.1439
0.3109


300
10
0.1880
0.1203
0.6281


400
89
0.1546
0.1126
0.7204


400
10
0.1281
0.1266
0.9875
















TABLE 4







Tetrahydrofuran dehydra-decyclization to butadiene using H—Y zeolite


Catalyst H—Y


Mass (mg) 45.2












Space





Temperature
Velocity
Butadiene
Butadiene
THF


(° C.)
(s−1)
Selectivity
Yield
Conversion





200
89
0.9598
0.1001
0.1043


200
10
0.8807
0.2903
0.3296


300
89
0.6589
0.2760
0.4189


300
10
0.4917
0.4683
0.9524


400
89
0.4063
0.2310
0.5686


400
10
0.3162
0.3012
0.9525
















TABLE 5







Tetrahydrofuran dehydra-decyclization to butadiene using P-SPP


Catalyst P-SPP


Mass (mg) 42.5












Space





Temperature
Velocity
Butadiene
Butadiene
THF


(° C.)
(s−1)
Selectivity
Yield
Conversion





200
89
0.4646
0.0004
0.0008


200
10
0.8612
0.0016
0.0019


300
89
0.9379
0.0079
0.0084


300
10
0.9776
0.0250
0.0256


400
89
0.9626
0.0308
0.0320


400
10
0.9731
0.1084
0.1114
















TABLE 6







Tetrahydrofuran dehydra-decyclization to butadiene using ZrO2.


Catalyst ZrO2


Mass (mg) 200












Space





Temperature
Velocity
Butadiene
Butadiene
THF


(° C.)
(s−1)
Selectivity
Yield
Conversion





200
89
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000


200
10
1.0000
0.0001
0.0001


300
89
1.0000
0.0056
0.0056


300
10
0.7570
0.0126
0.0166


400
89
0.6231
0.0122
0.0196


400
10
0.6041
0.0288
0.0476
















TABLE 7







Tetrahydrofuran dehydra-decyclization to


butadiene using tricalcium phosphate


Catalyst TCP


Mass (mg) 111.7












Space





Temperature
Velocity
Butadiene
Butadiene
THF


(° C.)
(s−1)
Selectivity
Yield
Conversion





200
89
0.0167
0.0000
0.0011


200
10
0.0204
0.0000
0.0012


300
89
0.0172
0.0001
0.0040


300
10
0.0491
0.0003
0.0069


400
89
0.1139
0.0002
0.0018


400
10
0.0425
0.0007
0.0105
















TABLE 8







Tetrahydrofuran dehydra-decyclization to butadiene using SiO2—Al2O3


Catalyst SiO2•Al2O3


Mass (mg) 200












Space





Temperature
Velocity
Butadiene
Butadiene
THF


(° C.)
(s−1)
Selectivity
Yield
Conversion





200
89
0.8631
0.0076
0.0088


200
10
0.8688
0.0202
0.0233


300
89
0.4728
0.1754
0.3710


300
10
0.4640
0.4640
1.0000


400
89
0.4833
0.4833
1.0000


400
10
0.2522
0.2522
1.0000
















TABLE 9







Tetrahydrofuran dehydra-decyclization to butadiene using H-BEA zeolite


Catalyst H-BEA


Mass (mg) 45.1












Space





Temperature
Velocity
Butadiene
Butadiene
THF


(° C.)
(s−1)
Selectivity
Yield
Conversion





200
89
0.6813
0.1809
0.2655


200
10
0.5765
0.5017
0.8702


300
89
0.2849
0.2234
0.7840


300
10
0.3982
0.3873
0.9725


400
89
0.2036
0.1803
0.8857


400
10
0.3512
0.3512
1.0000
















TABLE 10







Tetrahydrofuran dehydra-decyclization to


butadiene using magnesium oxide (MgO)


Catalyst MgO


Mass (mg) 96












Space





Temperature
Velocity
Butadiene
Butadiene
THF


(° C.)
(s−1)
Selectivity
Yield
Conversion





200
89
0.0000
0.0000
0.0219


200
10
0.0000
0.0000
0.0001


300
89
0.5000
0.0000
0.0000


300
10
0.5733
0.0000
0.0000


400
89
0.0232
0.0000
0.0010


400
10
0.1513
0.0002
0.0012
















TABLE 11







Tetrahydrofuran dehydra-decyclization to butadiene


using phosphotungstic acid (PTA), H3PW12O40


Catalyst PTA


Mass (mg) 136












Space





Temperature
Velocity
Butadiene
Butadiene
THF


(° C.)
(s−1)
Selectivity
Yield
Conversion





200
89
0.9042
0.0070
0.0077


200
10
0.8298
0.0156
0.0188


300
89
0.7143
0.0308
0.0431


300
10
0.5704
0.0492
0.0862


400
89
0.6062
0.0735
0.1213


400
10
0.5369
0.1018
0.1896
















TABLE 12







Tetrahydrofuran dehydra-decyclization to


butadiene using activated carbon (C)


Catalyst C


Mass (mg) 17.7












Space





Temperature
Velocity
Butadiene
Butadiene
THF


(° C.)
(s−1)
Selectivity
Yield
Conversion





200
89
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000


200
10
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000


300
89
0.0000
0.0000
0.0001


300
10
0.1913
0.0000
0.0001


400
89
0.6331
0.0001
0.0002


400
10
0.0773
0.0001
0.0012
















TABLE 13







Tetrahydrofuran dehydra-decyclization to butadiene


using metal organic framework (MOF) (MIL 101)


Catalyst MOF


Mass (mg) 25












Space





Temperature
Velocity
Butadiene
Butadiene
THF


(° C.)
(s−1)
Selectivity
Yield
Conversion





150
89
0.4447
0.0615
0.1383


150
10
0.5049
0.0952
0.1885


175
89
0.4453
0.0245
0.0549


175
10
0.6482
0.0485
0.0748


200
89
0.4041
0.0036
0.0088


200
10
0.1924
0.0073
0.0379
















TABLE 14







Tetrahydrofuran dehydra-decyclization to butadiene using niobia (Nb2O5)


Catalyst Nb2O5


Mass (mg) 132.5












Space





Temperature
Velocity
Butadiene
Butadiene
THF


(° C.)
(s−1)
Selectivity
Yield
Conversion





200
89
0.6622
0.0002
0.0003


200
10
0.6217
0.0003
0.0004


300
89
0.7707
0.0209
0.0271


300
10
0.7412
0.0197
0.0266


400
89
0.7636
0.0405
0.0530


400
10
0.6945
0.0370
0.0533
















TABLE 15







Tetrahydrofuran dehydra-decyclization to butadiene using Sn-BEA Zeolite


Catalyst Sn-BEA


Mass (mg) 44.1












Space





Temperature
Velocity
Butadiene
Butadiene
THF


(° C.)
(s−1)
Selectivity
Yield
Conversion





200
89
0.8857
0.0001
0.0002


200
10
0.9443
0.0005
0.0005


300
89
0.8455
0.0009
0.0011


300
10
0.6842
0.0046
0.0067


400
89
0.5676
0.0035
0.0061


400
10
0.5215
0.0170
0.0327
















TABLE 16







Tetrahydrofuran dehydra-decyclization to butadiene using P-Celite ®


Catalyst P-Celite ®


Mass (mg) 41.1












Space





Temperature
Velocity
Butadiene
Butadiene
THF


(° C.)
(s−1)
Selectivity
Yield
Conversion





200
89
0.5015
0.0002
0.0003


200
10
0.6741
0.0004
0.0006


300
89
0.8442
0.0018
0.0022


300
10
0.9023
0.0044
0.0049


400
89
0.9199
0.0119
0.0130


400
10
0.9149
0.0372
0.0407
















TABLE 17







2-methyltetrahydrofuran dehydra-decyclization to pentadiene using P-SPP


Catalyst P-SPP


Mass (mg) 42












Space





Temperature
Velocity
Pentadiene
Pentadiene
2-MTHF


(° C.)
(s−1)
Selectivity
Yield
Conversion





200
89
0.9788
0.0169
0.0172


200
10
0.9915
0.0538
0.0542


300
89
0.9914
0.0822
0.0829


300
10
0.9726
0.2903
0.2985


400
89
0.9471
0.2104
0.2221


400
10
0.9265
0.7009
0.7565
















TABLE 18







2,5-dimethyltetrahydrofuran dehydra-


decyclization to hexadiene using P-SPP


Catalyst P-SPP


Mass (mg) 42












Space





Temperature
Velocity
Hexadiene
Hexadiene
2,5 DMTHF


(° C.)
(s−1)
Selectivity
Yield
Conversion





200
89
0.9902
0.0547
0.0553


200
10
0.9687
0.4061
0.4192


300
89
0.9830
0.2053
0.2088


300
10
0.9096
0.6934
0.7624


400
89
0.9252
0.4075
0.4404


400
10
0.8101
0.8101
1.0000









A variety of solid acid catalysts were tested for the dehydra-decyclization of tetrahydrofuran to butadiene, including: phosphorous acid impregnated self-pillared pentasil (P-SPP), phosphotungstic acid supported on MCM-41 (PWA), tin framework substituted BEA zeolite (Sn-BEA), amorphous silica alumina (SiAl), and Al framework zeolite (ZSM-5). Catalysts were tested in a packed bed flow reactor operated at 250° C. and a weight hourly space velocity of 1 g THF g catalyst−1 hf−1, with a THF partial pressure of 5 torr. FIG. 5 shows selectivity to butadiene (line plot) and THF conversion (bar graph) for these catalysts. While ZSM-5 provides the highest conversion of THF, it resulted in the lowest selectivity to butadiene. Conversely, P-SPP affords the highest selectivity to butadiene but with the lowest conversion level of THF. PWA provides an optimal intermediate with regards to butadiene yield; the conversion to THF was comparable to ZSM-5 with a relatively high selectivity to butadiene of about 90%.


Preparation and Dehydration of 2-Methyl-1,4-Butanediol

Liquid-phase hydrogenation reactions were performed in 100 mL high pressure reactors (model 4598HPHT, Parr Instrument Co.) equipped with Hastelloy C-276 internals, a magnetic stirrer with gas-entrainment propeller, liquid sampling port, and electronic pressure gauge. 2-methyl-1,4-butanediol was prepared by a previously established method (Spanjers, C. S.; Schneiderman, D. K.; Wang, J. Z.; Wang, J.; Hillmyer, M. A.; Zhang, K.; Dauenhauer, P. J. ChemCatChem 2016, DOI: 10.10). Briefly, 40 g of itaconic acid (Sigma Aldrich) was added to a 100 mL Parr reactor with 20 mL deionized water. To the mixture, 2 g 10 wt. % Pd/C (Sigma Aldrich) was added. The mixture was heated to 220° C. under 140 bar H2 for 3 days. The reactor was subsequently cooled, de-pressurized, and 2.5 g 5 wt. % Ru/C (Sigma Aldrich) was added. The mixture was re-heated to 120° C. under 140 bar H2 for 3 days. The reaction product was filtered and purified in a rotary evaporator to yield 95% pure MBDO.


Dehydration reactions were performed in a high throughput pulsed flow reactor (HTPFR), such as that described with respect to FIG. 3. Experiments were performed at reaction temperatures of 175 to 400° C. The space velocity was controlled by adjusting the carrier gas (He, 99.999%) flow rate to the split vent. Space velocities of 9-400 s′ were tested with the reactor, where space velocity is defined previously herein. He pressure was kept constant at 30 psig.


Each experiment was performed by injecting 1 μL of pure MBDO into the reactor followed by immediate separation and quantification of the products. Reaction products were quantified by separating on a column (Agilent Plot-Q, 30 m, 0.32 mm ID, 20 μm film thickness; temperature program: 40° C. for 2 min, 10° C./min to 270° C., hold 10 min) and detecting with a Polyarc/FID. The Polyarc (Activated Research Company) allows for calibration-free quantitative analysis of hydrocarbons because the FID signal area is proportional to the moles of each compound.


Isoprene selectivity is defined previously herein as diene selectivity. The reaction by-products exclude 3-MTHF, because this compound is an intermediate in the production of isoprene and can be recycled. 3-MTHF yield is defined analogously to diene yield.


The following catalysts were tested for 2-methyl-1,4-butanediol dehydration to isoprene: CeO2 (Sigma Aldrich), H-ZSM-5 Zeolite (Zeolyst CBV28014 SiO2/Al2O3 ratio=280), H-Y Zeolite (Zeolyst CBV760, SiO2/Al2O3=60), H-BEA Zeolite (Zeolyst CBV811C-300 SiO2/Al2O3 ratio=360), ZrO2 (Sigma Aldrich), phosphorous-self-pillared pentasil (P-SPP), MgO (Alfa Aesar), tricalcium phosphate (TCP, Sigma Aldrich), SiO2.Al2O3(Sigma Aldrich), activated carbon (Sigma Aldrich), metal organic framework catalyst (MOF), niobium oxide (Nb2O5, Sigma Aldrich), phosphotungstic acid (H3PW12O40, Sigma Aldrich), Sn-BEA Zeolite (Chang C-C, Wang Z, Dornath P, Je Cho H, & Fan W (2012) Rapid synthesis of Sn-Beta for the isomerization of cellulosic sugars. RSC Advances 2(28):10475-10477) and P-Celite (Hong Je Cho, Limin Ren, Vivek Vattipalli, Yu-Hao Yeh, Nicholas Gould, Bingjun Xu, Raymond J. Gorte, Raul Lobo, Paul J. Dauenhauer, Michael Tsapatsis, and Wei Fan, Renewable p-Xylene from 2, 5-Dimethylfuran and Ethylene Using Phosphorus-Containing Zeolite Catalysts ChemCatChem 9 (3), 398-402, 2017)). All catalysts were pressed, crushed, and sieved to a particle size of 0.5 to 1 mm. With the exception of MOF MTh 101, all catalysts were pre-treated under flowing He at 400° C. for about 1 hr. MOF MIL 101 was pre-treated under flowing He at 150° C. for 1 hr.



FIG. 6 shows a summary of the catalytic data obtained for the illustrative catalysts that were tested. Detailed catalytic data for the dehydration of MBDO to isoprene over fifteen different catalysts are presented in Tables 19-33. Data for the conversion of 3-MTHF to isoprene over P-SPP is presented in Table 34.









TABLE 19







2-methyl-1,4-butanediol dehydration to isoprene using CeO2


Catalyst CeO2


Mass (mg) 100












Temper-
Space






ature
Velocity
Isoprene
Isoprene
3-MTHF
MBDO


(° C.)
(s−1)
Selectivity
Yield
Yield
Conversion















200
201
0.0000
0.0000
0.0013
0.0050


200
101
0.0000
0.0000
0.0010
0.0069


200
52
0.0000
0.0000
0.0009
0.0055


200
22
0.0000
0.0000
0.0007
0.0055


250
201
0.0396
0.0003
0.0113
0.0184


250
101
0.0353
0.0003
0.0125
0.0209


250
52
0.0385
0.0003
0.0120
0.0195


250
22
0.0199
0.0001
0.0090
0.0159


300
201
0.3480
0.0086
0.0182
0.0428


300
101
0.4020
0.0132
0.0237
0.0565


300
52
0.4155
0.0136
0.0231
0.0558


300
22
0.3179
0.0105
0.0241
0.0572


350
201
0.4524
0.0241
0.0257
0.0789


350
101
0.4890
0.0286
0.0382
0.0967


350
52
0.4410
0.0255
0.0403
0.0982


350
22
0.4129
0.0259
0.0464
0.1092


400
201
0.4582
0.0453
0.0916
0.1906


400
101
0.3730
0.0393
0.1279
0.2333


400
52
0.3376
0.0338
0.1303
0.2305


400
22
0.4210
0.0308
0.1320
0.2052
















TABLE 20





2-methyl-1,4-butanediol dehydration to isoprene using H-ZSM-5 zeolite


















Catalyst
H-ZSM-5 Zeolite,




SiO2/Al2O3 = 280



Mass (mg)
75

















Space


3-



Temperature
Velocity
Isoprene
Isoprene
MTHF
MBDO


(° C.)
(s−1)
Selectivity
Yield
Yield
Conversion





200
80
0.4731
0.0407
0.9140
1.0000


200
9
0.3416
0.0606
0.8225
1.0000


250
80
0.1937
0.1096
0.4341
1.0000


250
9
0.0581
0.0581
0.0000
1.0000


300
80
0.0974
0.0811
0.1671
1.0000


300
9
0.0466
0.0466
0.0000
1.0000


350
80
0.0617
0.0576
0.0656
1.0000


350
9
0.0489
0.0489
0.0000
1.0000
















TABLE 21





2-methyl-1,4-butanediol dehydration to isoprene using H—Y zeolite


















Catalyst
H—Y Zeolite,




SiO2/Al2O3 = 60



Mass (mg)
65

















Space


3-



Temperature
Velocity
Isoprene
Isoprene
MTHF
MBDO


(° C.)
(s−1)
Selectivity
Yield
Yield
Conversion





200
80
0.0941
0.0300
0.6811
1.0000


200
9
0.0319
0.0232
0.2715
1.0000


250
80
0.0702
0.0223
0.6825
1.0000


250
9
0.0384
0.0256
0.3338
1.0000


300
80
0.0735
0.0273
0.6293
1.0000


300
9
0.0173
0.0162
0.0591
1.0000


350
80
0.0404
0.0253
0.3739
1.0000


350
9
0.0234
0.0234
0.0000
1.0000
















TABLE 22





2-methyl-1,4-butanediol dehydration to isoprene using P-SPP


















Catalyst
P-SPP



Mass (mg)
7

















Space


3-



Temperature
Velocity
Isoprene
Isoprene
MTHF
MBDO


(° C.)
(s−1)
Selectivity
Yield
Yield
Conversion





200
202
0.6516
0.0094
0.3768
0.3913


250
202
0.7369
0.0321
0.4079
0.4515


300
202
0.7061
0.0539
0.4821
0.5585


350
202
0.6798
0.0670
0.5871
0.6857


400
202
0.6361
0.0804
0.6264
0.7528


400
103
0.6398
0.1037
0.7374
0.8995


400
44
0.6560
0.1208
0.8023
0.9865
















TABLE 23





2-methyl-1,4-butanediol dehydration to isoprene using ZrO2


















Catalyst
ZrO2



Mass (mg)
200

















Space


3-



Temperature
Velocity
Isoprene
Isoprene
MTHF
MBDO


(° C.)
(s−1)
Selectivity
Yield
Yield
Conversion





200
89
0.0692
0.0004
0.0683
0.0735


200
10
0.0659
0.0004
0.0808
0.0867


250
89
0.1704
0.0052
0.1782
0.2086


250
10
0.1802
0.0053
0.2501
0.2795


300
89
0.2828
0.0356
0.4191
0.5451


300
10
0.2482
0.0261
0.6057
0.7109


350
89
0.3310
0.0701
0.5992
0.8110


350
10
0.3186
0.0587
0.8157
1.0000


400
89
0.3015
0.0816
0.7116
0.9824


400
10
0.2831
0.0605
0.7864
1.0000
















TABLE 24





2-methyl-1,4-butanediol dehydration to


isoprene using tricalcium phosphate


















Catalyst
Tricalcium




Phosphate



Mass (mg)
100

















Space


3-



Temperature
Velocity
Isoprene
Isoprene
MTHF
MBDO


(° C.)
(s−1)
Selectivity
Yield
Yield
Conversion





200
201
0.0000
0.0000
0.0007
0.0023


200
101
0.0000
0.0000
0.0004
0.0020


200
52
0.0000
0.0000
0.0005
0.0020


200
22
0.0000
0.0000
0.0007
0.0024


250
201
0.0000
0.0000
0.0004
0.0019


250
101
0.0000
0.0000
0.0006
0.0021


250
52
0.0000
0.0000
0.0008
0.0026


250
22
0.0000
0.0000
0.0011
0.0030


300
201
0.0000
0.0000
0.0006
0.0017


300
101
0.0000
0.0000
0.0008
0.0024


300
52
0.0000
0.0000
0.0011
0.0030


300
22
0.0000
0.0000
0.0016
0.0035


350
201
0.0000
0.0000
0.0016
0.0032


350
101
0.0000
0.0000
0.0025
0.0047


350
52
0.0000
0.0000
0.0026
0.0046


350
22
0.0053
0.0000
0.0033
0.0061


400
201
0.0056
0.0000
0.0113
0.0167


400
101
0.0079
0.0000
0.0159
0.0200


400
52
0.0042
0.0000
0.0203
0.0289


400
22
0.0076
0.0000
0.0261
0.0312
















TABLE 25





2-methyl-1,4-butanediol dehydration to isoprene using SiO2•Al2O3


















Catalyst
SiO2•Al2O3



Mass (mg)
50

















Space


3-



Temperature
Velocity
Isoprene
Isoprene
MTHF
MBDO


(° C.)
(s−1)
Selectivity
Yield
Yield
Conversion





200
160
0.4698
0.0103
0.9781
1.0000


225
160
0.5347
0.0202
0.9621
1.0000


250
160
0.5159
0.0387
0.9251
1.0000


275
160
0.5687
0.0549
0.9035
1.0000


300
160
0.4933
0.0586
0.8812
1.0000


325
160
0.4127
0.0695
0.8316
1.0000


350
160
0.3554
0.0776
0.7818
1.0000


375
160
0.2941
0.0905
0.6923
1.0000


400
160
0.2685
0.1098
0.5910
1.0000


300
17
0.3413
0.1985
0.4185
1.0000


300
41
0.3621
0.1366
0.6227
1.0000


300
81
0.3660
0.0885
0.7582
1.0000


300
120
0.3641
0.0544
0.8505
1.0000
















TABLE 26





2-methyl-1,4-butanediol dehydration to isoprene using H-BEA zeolite


















Catalyst
H-BEA Zeolite




SiO2/Al2O3 = 360



Mass (mg)
8

















Space


3-



Temperature
Velocity
Isoprene
Isoprene
MTHF
MBDO


(° C.)
(s−1)
Selectivity
Yield
Yield
Conversion





200
400
0.4058
0.0072
0.2481
0.2658


200
44
0.4886
0.0117
0.4937
0.5177


250
400
0.3963
0.0097
0.1745
0.1990


300
400
0.3543
0.0149
0.2376
0.2797


300
44
0.3166
0.0279
0.5778
0.6659


350
400
0.2968
0.0254
0.3832
0.4686


400
400
0.2530
0.0449
0.6334
0.8110


400
44
0.2194
0.0700
0.6571
0.9761
















TABLE 27





2-methyl-1,4-butanediol dehydration to isoprene


using magnesium oxide (MgO)


















Catalyst
MgO



Mass (mg)
100

















Space


3-



Temperature
Velocity
Isoprene
Isoprene
MTHF
MBDO


(° C.)
(s−1)
Selectivity
Yield
Yield
Conversion





200
89
0.0000
0.0000
0.0048
0.0048


200
10
0.0000
0.0000
0.0006
0.0015


250
89
0.0000
0.0000
0.0032
0.0032


250
10
0.0000
0.0000
0.0035
0.0053


300
89
0.0000
0.0000
0.0025
0.0049


300
10
0.0000
0.0000
0.0052
0.0082


350
89
0.0000
0.0000
0.0049
0.0106


350
10
0.0174
0.0002
0.0154
0.0282
















TABLE 28





2-methyl-1,4-butanediol dehydration to isoprene using


phosphotungstic acid (PTA), H3PW12O40


















Catalyst
PTA



Mass (mg)
100

















Space


3-



Temperature
Velocity
Isoprene
Isoprene
MTHF
MBDO


(° C.)
(s−1)
Selectivity
Yield
Yield
Conversion





200
89
0.1075
0.0037
0.9658
1.0000


200
10
0.2715
0.0155
0.9429
1.0000


250
89
0.1064
0.0050
0.9534
1.0000


250
10
0.1404
0.0109
0.9226
1.0000


300
89
0.2344
0.0150
0.9360
1.0000


300
10
0.1662
0.0152
0.8867
1.0000


350
89
0.3365
0.0406
0.8793
1.0000


350
10
0.1305
0.0222
0.8296
1.0000


400
89
0.3492
0.0682
0.8048
1.0000


400
10
0.1009
0.0239
0.7632
1.0000
















TABLE 29





2-methyl-1,4-butanediol dehydration to


isoprene using activated carbon (C)


















Catalyst
Activated carbon



Mass (mg)
20

















Space


3-



Temperature
Velocity
Isoprene
Isoprene
MTHF
MBDO


(° C.)
(s−1)
Selectivity
Yield
Yield
Conversion





200
89
0.0516
0.0005
0.0423
0.0529


200
10
0.0412
0.0004
0.0151
0.0241


250
89
0.0486
0.0003
0.0093
0.0156


250
10
0.0260
0.0002
0.0354
0.0428


300
89
0.0103
0.0001
0.0167
0.0226


300
10
0.0195
0.0002
0.0663
0.0743


350
89
0.0232
0.0002
0.0187
0.0252


350
10
0.0086
0.0001
0.0827
0.0989
















TABLE 30





2-methyl-1,4-butanediol dehydration to isoprene


using metal organic framework (MIL 101)


















Catalyst
MOF



Mass (mg)
20

















Space


3-



Temperature
Velocity
Isoprene
Isoprene
MTHF
MBDO


(° C.)
(s−1)
Selectivity
Yield
Yield
Conversion





200
89
0.0059
0.0003
0.4034
0.4494


200
10
0.0028
0.0002
0.9163
0.9925


250
89
0.0245
0.0014
0.8226
0.8788


250
10
0.0300
0.0009
0.9679
0.9994


300
89
0.1059
0.0087
0.7696
0.8515


300
10
0.1037
0.0077
0.9185
0.9960


175
89
0.0000
0.0000
0.1142
0.1449


175
10
0.0000
0.0000
0.1445
0.1720


150
89
0.0000
0.0000
0.0356
0.0514


150
10
0.0000
0.0000
0.0366
0.0492
















TABLE 31





2-methyl-1,4-butanediol dehydration to isoprene using niobia (Nb2O5)


















Catalyst
Nb2O5



Mass (mg)
130

















Space


3-



Temperature
Velocity
Isoprene
Isoprene
MTHF
MBDO


(° C.)
(s−1)
Selectivity
Yield
Yield
Conversion





200
89
0.0212
0.0002
0.1299
0.1394


200
10
0.0484
0.0002
0.1501
0.1543


250
89
0.3807
0.0064
0.2807
0.2974


250
10
0.4121
0.0082
0.3757
0.3956


300
89
0.4226
0.0315
0.4830
0.5575


300
10
0.4145
0.0342
0.7116
0.7940


350
89
0.3467
0.0313
0.7597
0.8500


350
10
0.3136
0.0221
0.9295
1.0000


400
89
0.0317
0.0048
0.8492
1.0000


400
10
0.0333
0.0066
0.8031
1.0000
















TABLE 32





2-methyl-1,4-butanediol dehydration to isoprene using P-Celite ®


















Catalyst
P-Celite ®



Mass (mg)
35

















Space


3-



Temperature
Velocity
Isoprene
Isoprene
MTHF
MBDO


(° C.)
(s−1)
Selectivity
Yield
Yield
Conversion





200
160
0.4818
0.0081
0.3077
0.3246


200
17
0.3921
0.0065
0.2948
0.3114


250
160
0.4674
0.0152
0.2661
0.2987


250
17
0.4710
0.0158
0.6028
0.6362


300
160
0.3700
0.0165
0.4023
0.4468


300
17
0.4576
0.0253
0.8165
0.8717


350
160
0.3690
0.0294
0.4336
0.5133


350
17
0.5091
0.0502
0.8578
0.9565


400
160
0.4510
0.0588
0.4713
0.6016


400
17
0.5542
0.1032
0.8116
0.9978
















TABLE 33





2-methyl-1,4-butanediol dehydration to isoprene using Sn-BEA zeolite


















Catalyst
Sn-BEA



Mass (mg)
47.1

















Space


3-



Temperature
Velocity
Isoprene
Isoprene
MTHF
MBDO


(° C.)
(s−1)
Selectivity
Yield
Yield
Conversion





200
89
0.3243
0.0038
0.9884
1.0000


200
10
0.3322
0.0035
0.9896
1.0000


250
89
0.2994
0.0087
0.9710
1.0000


250
10
0.3730
0.0081
0.9784
1.0000


300
89
0.2613
0.0162
0.9381
1.0000


300
10
0.3063
0.0137
0.9552
1.0000


350
89
0.2820
0.0230
0.9183
1.0000


350
10
0.2924
0.0210
0.9283
1.0000


400
89
0.3071
0.0315
0.8975
1.0000


400
10
0.2800
0.0359
0.8717
1.0000
















TABLE 34





3-Methyltetrahydrofuran dehydration to isoprene using P-SPP


















Catalyst
P-SPP



Mass (mg)
45















Temperature
Space Velocity
S
Y
3-MTHF


(° C.)
(s−1)
(Isoprenes)
(Isoprenes)
Conversion





200
89
0.0796
0.0010
0.0130


200
10
0.5493
0.0057
0.0103


250
89
0.2029
0.0044
0.0218


250
10
0.6294
0.0199
0.0317


300
89
0.3207
0.0073
0.0229


300
10
0.7703
0.0493
0.0640


350
89
0.4036
0.0114
0.0284


350
10
0.7919
0.1032
0.1303


400
89
0.5338
0.0211
0.0395


400
10
0.8230
0.1668
0.2027









Thus, embodiments of methods of forming dienes from cyclic ethers and diols are disclosed. The implementations described above and other implementations are within the scope of the following claims. One skilled in the art will appreciate that the present disclosure can be practiced with embodiments other than those disclosed. The disclosed embodiments are presented for purposes of illustration and not limitation.

Claims
  • 1. A method of forming a diene, the method comprising: contacting a reactant comprising at least one of a cyclic ether and a diol with a heterogeneous acid catalyst to yield a reaction mixture comprising a diene, wherein the heterogeneous acid catalyst comprises at least one of a Lewis acid catalyst, a solid Lewis-acid catalyst, a Brønsted acid catalyst, a solid acid catalyst, a supported phosphoric acid catalyst, and a sulfonated catalyst.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, wherein the reactant is derived from biomass.
  • 3. The method of claim 1, wherein the reactant comprises a cyclic ether.
  • 4. The method of claim 3, wherein the cyclic ether has a tetrahydrofuran skeleton.
  • 5. The method of claim 4, wherein the cyclic either comprises tetrahydrofuran and the diene comprises butadiene.
  • 6. The method of claim 5, wherein a selectivity of the butadiene is at least 95%.
  • 7. The method of claim 3, wherein the cyclic ether comprises 2-methyltetrahydrofuran and the diene comprises pentadiene.
  • 8. The method of claim 7, wherein a selectivity of the pentadiene is at least 95%.
  • 9. The method of claim 3, wherein the cyclic ether comprises 2,5-dimethyl tetrahydrofuran and the diene comprises hexadiene.
  • 10. The method of claim 9, wherein a selectivity of the hexadiene is at least 90%.
  • 11. The method of claim 3, the cyclic ether comprises 3-methyltetrahydrofuran, and the diene comprises isoprene.
  • 12. The method of claim 11, wherein a selectivity of the isoprene is at least 65%.
  • 13. The method of claim 11, further comprising processing biomass to yield an acid comprising least one of citric acid, itaconic acid, and mesaconic acid, and processing the acid to yield the 3-methyltetrahydrofuran.
  • 14. The method of claim 11, wherein the 3-methyltetrahydrofuran is derived from at least one of citric acid, itaconic acid, and mesaconic acid.
  • 15. The method of claim 1, wherein the reactant comprises a diol.
  • 16. The method of claim 15, wherein the diol comprises 2-methyl-1,4-butanediol, and the diene comprises isoprene.
  • 17. The method of claim 16, wherein a selectivity of the isoprene is at least 70%.
  • 18. The method of claim 1, wherein the contacting occurs at a temperature from 100° C. to 600° C., 150° C. to 400° C., 100° C. to 500° C., or 200° C. to 300° C.
  • 19. The method of claim 1, wherein the contacting occurs at a pressure from 0 psia to 500 psia (34 atm), at a pressure up to 147 psia (10 atm), at pressure from 1 atm to 10 atm, or from 1 atm to 2 atm.
  • 20. The method of claim 1, wherein the contacting occurs in the presence of an inert gas.
  • 21. The method of claim 20, wherein the inert gas comprises at least one of He, Ar, and N2.
  • 22. The method of claim 1, wherein the contacting occurs in the vapor phase.
  • 23. The method of claim 1, further comprising separating the diene from the reaction mixture.
  • 24. The method of claim 1, wherein the reaction mixture comprises unreacted cyclic ether, unreacted diol, or both, and further comprising contacting the unreacted cyclic ether, unreacted diol, or both with the heterogeneous acid catalyst to yield the diene.
  • 25. The method of claim 1, wherein the heterogeneous acid catalyst comprises a Lewis acid catalyst, and the Lewis acid catalyst comprises at least one of AlCl3, TiCl4, FeCl3, BF3, SnCl4, ZnCl2, ZnBr2, AMBERLYST-70, SiO2, Nb2O5, MgO, TiO2, SiO2—Al2O3, CeO2, and Cr2O3.
  • 26. The method of claim 1, wherein the heterogeneous acid catalyst comprises a Brønsted acid catalyst, and the Brønsted acid catalyst comprises at least one of HCl, HBr, HI, HClO4, HClO3, HNO3, H2SO4, CH3COOH, CF3COOH, and H3PO4.
  • 27. The method of claim 1, wherein the heterogeneous acid catalyst comprises a solid acid catalyst, and the solid acid catalyst comprises at least one of a zeolite type catalyst, a substituted-zeolite type catalyst, a heteropolyacid type catalyst, a phosphate type catalyst, a zirconia type catalyst, a celite type catalyst, a metal organic framework type catalyst, a carbon type catalyst, and a sulfonic acid catalyst.
  • 28. The method of claim 27, wherein the solid acid catalyst comprises a zeolite type catalyst.
  • 29. The method of claim 28, wherein the zeolite type catalyst comprises at least one of H-ZSM-5, H-BEA, H-Y, mordenite, ferrierite, chabazite, and self-pillared pentasil.
  • 30. The method of claim 29, wherein the zeolite type catalyst comprises self-pillared pentasil.
  • 31. The method of claim 28, wherein the zeolite type catalyst has an average pore size of at least 5 A.
  • 32. The method of claim 28, wherein the zeolite type catalyst comprises a phosphorus-containing zeolite type catalyst.
  • 33. The method of claim 32, wherein the phosphorus-containing zeolite type catalyst comprises at least one of phosphorus-containing MFI, phosphorus-containing MEL, phosphorus-containing BEA, phosphorus-containing FAU, phosphorus-containing MOR, phosphorus-containing FER, phosphorus-containing CHA, and phosphorus-containing self-pillared pentasil.
  • 34. The method of claim 33, wherein the phosphorus-containing zeolite type catalyst comprises phosphorus-containing self-pillared pentasil, and the phosphorus-containing self-pillared pentasil has a ratio of silicon atoms to phosphorus atoms in a range of 1:1 to 1000:1 or 3:1 to 150:1.
  • 35. The method of claim 33, wherein the phosphorus-containing zeolite type catalyst comprises phosphorus-containing self-pillared pentasil, and the phosphorus-containing self-pillared pentasil has rotational intergrowths of single-unit-cell lamellae that lead to repetitive branching nanosheets.
  • 36. The method of claim 35, wherein the nanosheets have a thickness of about 2 nm and define a network of micropores having a diameter of about 0.5 nm.
  • 37. The method of claim 33, wherein the phosphorus-containing self-pillared pentasil has a house of cards arrangement defining a network of mesopores having a dimension in a range of 2 nm to 7 nm.
  • 38. The method of claim 32, wherein the phosphorus-containing zeolite type catalyst is substantially free of aluminum.
  • 39. The method of claim 38, wherein the phosphorus-containing zeolite type catalyst comprises less than 5 wt %, less than 4 wt %, less than 3 wt %, less than 2 wt %, or less than 1 wt % of aluminum.
  • 40. The method of claim 27, wherein the zeolite type catalyst comprises a substituted-zeolite type catalyst.
  • 41. The method of claim 40, wherein the substituted zeolite type catalyst comprises at least one of Sn, Ge, Ga, B, Ti, Fe, and Zr.
  • 42. The method of claim 27, wherein the heterogeneous acid catalyst comprises a heteropolyacid type catalyst, and the heteropolyacid type catalyst comprises at least one of H3PW12O40, H3SiW12O40, H5AlW12O40, H6CoW12O40, H3PMo12O40, H3SiMo12O40, and Cs+ substituted heteropolyacid type catalyst.
  • 43. The method of claim 27, wherein the heterogeneous acid catalyst comprises a phosphate type catalyst, and the phosphate type catalyst comprises at least one of niobium phosphate (NbOPO4), zirconium phosphate (ZrO2—PO4), siliconiobium phosphate (Nb—P—Si—O), tricalcium phosphate (Ca3(PO4)2), lithium phosphate (Li3PO4), and lithium sodium phosphate (Li3NaP2O7).
  • 44. The method of claim 27, wherein the heterogeneous acid catalyst comprises a zirconia type catalyst, and the zirconia type catalyst comprises at least one of SO3—ZrO2, SiO2—ZrO2, Zeolites-ZrO2, Al2O3—ZrO2, ZrO2, and WOx—ZrO2.
  • 45. The method of claim 27, wherein the heterogeneous acid catalyst comprises a celite type catalyst, and the celite type catalyst comprises P-CELITE.
  • 46. The method of claim 27, wherein the heterogeneous acid catalyst comprises a metal organic framework catalyst.
  • 47. The method of claim 46, wherein the metal organic framework catalyst comprises MIL 101.
  • 48. The method of claim 27, wherein the heterogeneous acid catalyst comprises a carbon type catalyst, and the carbon type catalyst comprises at least one of activated carbon, sulfated carbon, and SO3H-functionalized carbon.
  • 49. The method of claim 1, wherein the heterogeneous acid catalyst comprises a sulfonated catalyst, and the sulfonated catalyst comprises at least one of NAFION and AMBERLYST.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application claims the benefit of U.S. Application Ser. No. 62/402,238 entitled “USE OF PHOSPHORUS-CONTAINING SOLID CATALYSTS” filed Sep. 30, 2016; U.S. Application Ser. No. 62/410,919 entitled “METHODS OF FORMING ISOPRENE FROM 2-METHYL-1,4-BUTANEDIOL, DERIVATIVES OR COMBINATIONS THEREOF” filed Oct. 21, 2016; U.S. Application Ser. No. 62/410,922 entitled “METHODS OF FORMING DIENES FROM TETRAHYDROFURAN, DERIVATIVES OR COMBINATIONS THEREOF” filed Oct. 21, 2016; U.S. Application Ser. No. 62/414,302 entitled “PHOSPHORUS-CONTAINING SOLID CATALYSTS AND METHODS OF USE THEREOF” filed Oct. 28, 2016; U.S. Application Ser. No. 62/419,202 entitled “METHODS OF FORMING ISOPRENE FROM 2-METHYL-1,4-BUTANEDIOL, DERIVATIVES OR COMBINATIONS THEREOF” filed Nov. 8, 2016; and U.S. Application Ser. No. 62/419,247 entitled “METHODS OF FORMING DIENES FROM TETRAHYDROFURAN, DERIVATIVES, OR COMBINATIONS THEREOF” filed Nov. 8, 2016, all of which are incorporated by reference herein in their entirety.

STATEMENT OF GOVERNMENT INTEREST

This invention was made with government support under DE-SC000104 awarded by the Department of Energy and CHE-1413862 awarded by the National Science Foundation. The government has certain rights in the invention.

PCT Information
Filing Document Filing Date Country Kind
PCT/US17/54550 9/29/2017 WO 00
Provisional Applications (6)
Number Date Country
62419202 Nov 2016 US
62419247 Nov 2016 US
62410919 Oct 2016 US
62402238 Sep 2016 US
62414302 Oct 2016 US
62410922 Oct 2016 US