The present invention relates to a single- or multiple-layered forming sieve for the wet end section of a paper machine, according to the pre-characterizing section of Claim 1.
In the conventional Fourdrinier paper-manufacturing method, an aqueous pulp or suspension of cellulose fibres (known as “paper stock”) is placed onto the upper surface of a so-called endless web made of wire and/or a synthetic material. This wire web acts as a filter, which causes the cellulose fibres to be separated from the aqueous medium and form a so-called wet-paper sheet. During formation of this wet-paper sheet, the forming sieve acts as a filter which separates the aqueous medium from the cellulose fibres, as the aqueous medium passes through the openings in the sieve.
To accelerate the removal of the water, the filtering process is very often carried out with the additional action of a vacuum applied to the underside of the sieve, i.e. on the machine side. Once the paper sheet has left the forming end section it is transferred to a press section of the paper machine, at this point it is guided through the gap between a pair, or several pairs, of pressure rollers, over which is stretched another fabric: a so-called “press felt”. The pressure of the rollers acting on the paper sheet removes additional moisture, and is frequently enhanced by the presence of a “mat” layer within the press felt. After passing through the pressing section, the paper is sent to a drying section of the machine for further removal of moisture. After drying, the paper is ready for any secondary processing which may be undertaken and finally packing.
The sieves used in paper-machines are made available as endless webs, and are manufactured by one of two methods. According to the first method, the free ends of individual flat woven webs are connected together by a procedure known as “splicing”, and in so doing the endless web is formed. In flat-woven paper-machine sieves formed in this way, the warp threads run in the machine direction, and the filling or weft threads run in the cross direction. According to the second production technique, the paper-machine sieves are directly fashioned in the form of a continuous strip, by the so-called endless-web method. In this method, the warp threads run in the cross direction of the machine, with the weft threads in the machine direction. Within the relevant literature, abbreviations for these terms are commonly used, with MD standing for “machine direction” and CMD for “cross machine direction”.
Within the wet end section of a paper machine, it is extremely important to maintain the cellulose fibres in the suspension on the paper side of the sieve, and to avoid markings within the forming sheet. These markings can occur when individual cellulose fibres are oriented within the paper sheet, such that their ends coincide with interstices between the individual threads of the sieve. In general, an attempt is made to solve this problem by providing a permeable sieve structure which is possessed of a coplanar surface, and which further allows the paper fibres to form a bridge over adjacent threads in the fabric and not penetrate into the interstices between them. As used herein, “coplanar” means that the uppermost parts of the threads, those which define the paper-forming surface of the sieve and are termed floats or knuckles respectively, lie at substantially the same height, so as to present a surface which is substantially “planar”. Fine paper, such as that used for high-quality printing, carbonization, cigarettes, electrical capacitors, and other papers of similar quality, has previously been produced on very finely woven sieves, as these present the flattest surfaces.
In order to make the surface of the cloth as close to planar as possible, particularly in the case of forming sieves, the surfaces are very often ground down with fine-grain emery paper. Such grinding is intended to improve the topography of the paper, and lead to a better final surface. Unfortunately, by grinding the surface in this way, the thread floats and knuckles of a sieve become damaged; this can be seen in
To further elucidate the state of the art as shown in
An objective of the current invention, is the preparation of sieves that present a highly coplanar surface, at least on the paper side, but preferably on both the paper and machine sides. This is to be achieved, even for sieves that are considerably thinner than those disclosed in the art, and have correspondingly reduced thread diameters. In light of the various problems presented above, this objective is to be achieved in particular for so-called forming sieves, i.e. sieves intended for use in the wet end section of a paper machine.
The above objective is achieved by the characterizing features given in claim 1, with advantageous further developments and embodiments being described in the subordinate claims.
A single- or multilayered forming sieve for the wet end-section of a paper machine with upper machine-direction, MD, and cross-machine-direction, CMD, threads facing the paper side, and lower MD and CMD threads facing the machine is disclosed. The forming sieve having, at least the paper-side thread inflection regions reshaped by means of one or a combination of temperature, pressure and/or moisture. A method for achieving such reshaping is given in claim 15, wherein rollers are used for the application of the pressure and/or temperature.
a-9c illustrate different roller configurations that may be employed with sieves of the present invention.
The production of sieves for paper machines in the current invention, is based around a system of compacting or “hot calendering” the fabric making up the sieve, in a press arrangement. This action is undertaken at least at one of, or a combination of: an elevated pressure, an elevated temperature and/or at an elevated moisture level, for a specific time; this time being a result of the chosen threads, and the desired properties of the finished product.
When fabrics which are possessed of an endless structure are employed, that is there are no ends making up a joining seam, they are usually configured with two warp thread systems. The calendering, or compacting, of this fabric is accomplished between at least two rollers, as can be seen in the examples shown in
b shows the simplest structure, in that only two rollers are provided, between which the fabric is compacted. In order to increase the usable area of the heated roller, which in turn means that the fabric will be in contact with the heat for a greater length of time, a third roller c can be provided as shown in
To compact or calender the fabric of the sieve, requires the provision of two rollers which can be brought together and a desired pressure applied between them. These are shown by reference numerals A and B in
As shown in the examples of
For fabrics that are possessed of two ends, which are joined together via a seam to form the endless structure, the compacting process is a little different. Initially, it is necessary to specifically control the pressures which are applied to the starting and end points of the fabric. This is achieved by providing a ramp control to the applied pressure, wherein the machine is aware of the start and end points to the fabric, and thus a process is achieved which suffers from no transitions. All other processing of the fabric follows the method detailed above for the preformed endless fabric.
The specific tension applied to the fabric during the calendering process, whether preformed or one with a seam, is dependent upon the individual fabric design. During the compacting process the fabric will change its length by up to +1-1.5%, a fact which requires taking into account at the fabric forming stage and prior to the calendering process. Furthermore, changes to the width of the fabric, which lie in the range 0-3% are generally monitored, and compensated for with simultaneous thermal treatment of the fabric.
As shown in
The threads which form the fabric of the sieves can comprise or contain a polymer such as one, or a combination of: a polyester, a polyamide and/or a polyolefin. Furthermore, the calendering process as disclosed can readily be implemented on sieves which have warp threads present on the paper side with a diameter of between 0.09 and 0.20 mm, and machine-side warp threads having a diameter of between 0.15 and 0.30 mm. In particular the paper side threads are chosen with a diameter of 0.13 mm and the machine-side threads with a diameter of about 0.18 mm. Additionally, the compressive process can be used on fabrics which are possessed of one or multiple layers.
As is shown in
The protruding knuckles or floats (10), can be seen in
By compacting the threads in the fabric of the sieve at the float or knuckle points, the contact area of the sieve with the paper is increased by around 25-30%, when compared with an untreated sieve. This increase, leads to a sieve which is possessed of a contact area that is around 40-45% of the total area of the sieve. Such a measurement can be seen in
In addition to the increase in contact area for the calendered fabrics, these sieves have much smoother surfaces, when compared with untreated or ground fabrics, which leads to a much improved final paper topography. Moreover, a sieve which has appropriately compacted floats on the paper-machine side in addition to the paper side, shows no different weft knuckle heights when the fabric is loaded, as would be caused by different materials: this again improves the final paper surface as the knuckle heights are reduced on the paper machine side, other problems associated with new sieves running on the machine are dramatically reduced. Of such problems, the most significant are those associated with the load which needs to be supported by the paper machine, and the starting up of the machine with a new sieve that has not been properly run-in. In particular, as a result of the broad, already formed, “thread ellipse”, a sieve which is adapted to the machine is more rapidly obtained. In a papermaking machine a sieve which is constructed in accordance with the present invention, can start up more rapidly, it requires less subsequent adjustment and begins quiet running sooner, this is when compared with currently employed sieves.
Sieves with the float or knuckle shape in accordance with the invention, exhibit no, or at least greatly reduced, differences at the transition point between the seam region and the solid fabric. This leads to the sieves producing no marking on topographically sensitive kinds of paper. As a result of the slightly broader and flatter float shapes, the sieve exhibits higher stability and stiffness, because the interwoven threads are displaced less with respect to one another.
Clearly, the process of calendering a fabric leads to a permanent reduction in the fabric thickness as a result of the applied pressure. Depending upon the specific treatment applied, the thickness of the fabric can be reduced by between 1 and 20% of the original. In order to achieve this, the inflection heights and shapes of the individual threads running through the fabric are permanently altered. As there is no loss of material in this technique, merely a compressing, the weight per unit area of the fabric remains constant.
In addition to the geometry of the threads within the sieve being altered after calendering, the internal volumes within the body of the fabric are permanently reduced. Obviously, when the fabrics are compressed and the thread geometry adjusted, it is necessary for the threads to move somewhere, and in this case there is a reduction in the void size lying between them as they are brought closer together. This reduction in cavity size between the fibres has advantageous effects for the sieves as they run on the paper making machines. When the sieve is being used to hold the paper stock as the aqueous medium is being removed, it is possible for the cavities within the fabric to induce turbulence as they move. Such turbulence often produces the unwanted side effect of dragging water along with the cavities, as the sieve moves through the machine. Clearly, if the water remains within the sieve, the drying of the paper stock is adversely affected. With the reduction in cavity size associated with fabrics treated by the current process, however, the problems associated with turbulence and water logging are lessened. Once again, depending upon the specific fabric and treatment thereto, the cavities can be reduced in size by between 1 and 15%.
Further advantages result from the change in inflection points between the threads in the fabric, and from their altered geometry. With the increase in contact surface area to the fabric, there is a related increase to the level of friction between the sieves and the paper forming machine. This leads to a reduced delay in the movement of the fabric when the machinery is initially started, and further reductions in the transverse motion whilst the machine is running. Such improvements increases the efficiency of the paper drying process, whilst additionally requiring less adjustment to the belts with prolonged usage. Moreover, in the seam regions where present, the thread-thread friction is increased with this change in the inflection between the warp and weft threads, the result being an increase in the seam stability and strength.
Standard, that is un-calendered, sieves which are formed with a seam, will tend to suffer from inconsistencies in the thickness of the fabric between the regions of the seam and the main body of the fabric. This difference in surface properties can have adverse effects on the paper production, leading to marking of the page, and will also lead to an increased level of wear in this region. The compressing techniques of the current invention, however, alleviate these problems by giving a fabric which has a uniform thickness along its entire length. Furthermore, internal stresses and tensions on the fabric threads which result from these inconsistencies in the un-treated sieves, are substantially equalized in the fabric calendered in accordance with the present invention.
A final property of the fabric that is altered with the compressive treatment, is that of the permeability. It is assumed that it is the compaction of the fabric, giving the reduction in fabric thickness with corresponding changes to the void size and density, which leads to this difference. Dependent upon the initial fabric, and the treatment done thereto, the permeability can be reduced from between 0 and 30%, and this is usually taken into consideration when the specific processing and fabric are being chosen.
While various features and embodiments of the invention are described above, they can readily be combined with each other resulting in further embodiments of the invention.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
20 2004 008 078 U | May 2004 | DE | national |
20 2004 009 300 U | Jun 2004 | DE | national |
This application is a continuation of and claims priority to U.S. application Ser. No. 10/591,112, filed on Aug. 31, 2006 which claims priority to PCT Application No. PCT/EP2005/004787, filed on May 3, 2005, which claims priority from German Utility Model Application Nos. DE 20 2004 009 300.6 filed Jun. 11, 2004 and 20 2004 008 078.8 filed May 19, 2004, the disclosure of each of which is hereby incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2292411 | Sutton | Aug 1942 | A |
3573164 | Friedberg et al. | Mar 1971 | A |
3905863 | Ayers | Sep 1975 | A |
4239065 | Trokhan | Dec 1980 | A |
4457968 | Harvey | Jul 1984 | A |
5407737 | Halterbeck et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5840637 | Denton et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
7514030 | Nilsson et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1115 699 | Oct 1961 | DE |
2 012 327 | Jul 1979 | DE |
41 37 984 | Nov 1991 | DE |
0 544 167 | Jun 1993 | EP |
WO 9701431 | Jan 1997 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Calendering, Clothmen:Textile Dictionary, retrieved Apr. 10, 2012, http://www.clothmen.com/dictionary.php?alpha=All&id=1013. |
International Search Report for PCT/EP2005/004787; date of mailing Jul. 27, 2005. |
Search report for German Application No. DE 20 2004 009 300.6; date of mailing Aug. 10, 2005. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100314064 A1 | Dec 2010 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10591112 | US | |
Child | 12763305 | US |