Formulation for Tin-.sup.117m /diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acids

Abstract

The invention provides improved formulations of .sup.117m Sn (Sn.sup.4+) DTPA which allow higher doses of .sup.117m Sn (Sn.sup.4+) to be administered than were previously possible. Methods for making pharmaceutical compositions comprising .sup.117m Sn (Sn.sup.4+) DTPA in which the amount of unchelated DTPA is minimized are disclosed along with methods of using the improved formlulations, both for palliation of bone pain associated with cancer and for treatment of osseous tumors.

Description

The present invention relates to the fields of pain management for cancer patients and cancer therapy. In particular, the present invention relates to treatment of bone pain resulting from cancer metastases and to treatment of osseous (bone) cancer using improved formulations of .sup.117m Sn (Sn.sup.4+) diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Bone metastases are the most common cause of cancer pain, and primary bone cancers may also cause severe chronic pain. Approximately 75-80% of patients with prostate, breast, and lung cancer develop osseous metastases which cause bone pain during the late stages of their illness. Clinical management of cancer-related bone pain through palliation is necessary to improve the quality of life of terminal cancer patients.

A number of options are currently available for clinical management of bone pain. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents, opioids, hormones, and cytotoxic chemotherapy are used in the initial stages of bone metastasis, and external beam radiation can be applied locally when bone pain occurs at a single site. As the patient's skeletal tumor burden increases, pain can increase and become multifocal, tending to move from one site to another. Hemibody external beam radiation can afford rapid pain relief for disseminated skeletal tumors. However, such extensive exposure to radiation may affect noncancerous rapidly dividing tissues in the gastrointestinal tract or bone marrow, and morbidity may result from hemibody radiotherapy for bone pain palliation.

Radiation emitted by intravenously administered radionuclides may also be used to treat bone pain palliation. A number of bone-seeking radioisotopes have been studied for their ability to palliate bone pain. For example, .sup.32 P, which emits a 1.7 MeV .beta. particle and has a half-life of 14.3 days, exhibits a 3- to 5-fold increase in uptake in bone around osseous metastases as compared to normal bone. The uptake of .sup.32 P into bone lesions can be increased by pretreatment with androgen, and patients thus treated frequently experienced pain relief within five to fourteen days of .sup.32 P orthophosphate administration, with response duration of two to four months. However, bone marrow receives a disproportionately high dose of .sup.32 P from the surrounding inorganic bone matrix and from the cellular component of the bone marrow space, resulting in myelosuppression as a side effect. Pancytopenia resulting from myelosuppression by .sup.32 P, though reversible, may necessitate transfusions. .sup.32 P orthophosphate is not currently used for palliation of metastatic bone pain.

.sup.153 Sm emits an 0.81 MeV .beta. particle, with a half-life of 46.3 hours. The stable .sup.153 Sm ethylenediaminetetramethylenephosphonate (EDTMP) complex has received FDA approval. Patients report clinical benefit within two weeks of .sup.153 Sm-EDTMP treatment, frequently within 48 hours of treatment, and pain relief may last from four to forty weeks. Reversible myelosuppression also results from bone pain palliation treatment with .sup.153 Sm-EDTMP. In addition, at the applied therapeutic doses (35 to 210 mCi) large amounts of radioactivity can be excreted in the patient's urine, creating contamination risks and potentially causing radiation cystitis.

.sup.186 Re emits a 1.07 MeV .beta. particle and a 137 keV, 9% abundance .gamma. photon, having a half-life of 89.3 hours. .sup.186 Re forms a stable complex with hydroxyethylidine diphosphonate (HEDP) which rapidly accumulates in osteoblastic metastases. Symptom relief occurs for 40-65% of patients within two weeks, and frequently within 24-48 hours. .sup.186 Re-HEDP causes reversible myelosuppression, and therapeutic doses of .sup.186 Re-HEDP (30 to 70 mCi) also create contamination and radiation cystitis risks. Phase III clinical trials of .sup.186 Re-HEDP have been completed.

.sup.89 Sr emits a 1.46 MeV .beta. particle and has a half-life of 50.5 days. The biological half-life of .sup.89 Sr exceeds 50 days in osteoblastic metastases, as compared to 14 days in normal bone. Bone pain relief occurs in 60 to 80% of patients, with onset two to four weeks after injection, though some patients may not experience relief for as much as ten weeks after treatment. The average duration of relief from .sup.89 Sr treatment is from three to six months. Treatment with .sup.89 Sr delays development of new bone pain in pre-existing but clinically silent metastases. Four weeks after therapy, .sup.89 Sr treatment typically causes a 30% decrease in platelet count which recovers slowly over 12 weeks. Toxicity from .sup.89 Sr treatment is cumulative, resulting from the total absorbed dose of radiation delivered to the bone marrow and from replacement of marrow by tumor as disease advances. In 1993, the FDA approved an adult dosage of 4 mCi of .sup.89 SrCl.sub.2 for bone pain palliation.

Although pain relief is believed to occur independently from radiation-induced tumor cell killing, administration of bone pain-palliating doses of .sup.153 Sm and .sup.186 Re results in transient changes in levels of certain biochemical markers related to cancer progression. When administered with low doses of cisplatin, .sup.89 Sr also demonstrates reductions in tumor markers. This observation has led to the suggestion that administration of higher doses of these nuclides might result in a tumoricidal effect. However, no anti-tumor effect or improvement in survival has been demonstrated to result from administration of .sup.153 Sm, .sup.186 Re, or .sup.89 Sr, and the ability to increase dosages of these nuclides is limited by their myelosuppressive effects.

.sup.117m Sn emits low energy conversion electrons (0.13 and 0.16 MeV) and a 159 keV .gamma. photon, having a half-life of 14.0 days. .sup.117m Sn (Sn.sup.4+) diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (DTPA) exhibits higher bone uptake and retention than .sup.32 P orthophosphate, .sup.153 Sm-EDTMP, .sup.186 Re-HEDP, and .sup.89 SrCl.sub.2. Because of this, therapeutic doses of .sup.117m Sn (Sn.sup.4+) DTPA are lower than those of .sup.153 Sm-EDTMP and .sup.186 Re-HEDP, resulting in less risk of contamination and radiation cystitis. The lower energies of the conversion electrons emitted by .sup.117m Sn result in less radiation exposure to the bone marrow and fewer hematologic side effects than are observed with .sup.153 Sm-EDTMP, .sup.186 Re-HEDP, and .sup.89 SrCl.sub.2. The .gamma. photon emitted by .sup.117 Sn allows imaging and quantification of the isotope in normal and metastatic bone. .sup.117m Sn(Sn.sup.4+) is particularly suitable for the dose escalation necessary to effect cell killing in osseous tumors, since the myeclosuppression which limits the benefits of the anti-tumor effects of .sup.153 Sm, .sup.186 Re, and .sup.89 Sr is not a limiting factor for .sup.117m Sn(Sn.sup.4+).

Atkins, et al., Radiology (1993) 186, 279-283, discloses biodistribution of low doses of .sup.117m Sn (Sn.sup.4+) DTPA administered to humans. Atkins, el al. (1995) J. Nucl. Med. 36, 725-729 reports a Phase II pilot study which demonstrates palliation of bone pain resulting from .sup.117m Sn (Sn.sup.4+) DTPA treatment. A Phase II study of .sup.117m Sn (Sn.sup.4+) DTPA as a bone pain palliation agent is reported in Krishnamurthy, et al. (1997) J Nucl. Med. 38, 230-237. A dose escalation study of 47 patients treated with .sup.117m Sn (Sn.sup.4+) DTPA for bone pain palliation is reported in Srivastava, et al. (1998) Clin. Cancer Res. 4, 61-68. All of the .sup.117m Sn (Sn.sup.4+) DTPA formulations used in these studies contained a 20-fold molar excess of DTPA over .sup.117m Sn (Sn.sup.4+) and an amount of CaCl.sub.2 corresponding to 80% of the molar amount of DTPA. The CaCl.sub.2 was administered with the .sup.117m Sn (Sn.sup.4+) DTPA to counteract any potential effect of uncomplexed DTPA on bone or blood calcium levels.

U.S. Pat. No. 4,533,541 discloses preparation of .sup.117m Sn (Sn.sup.4+) chelates capable of localizing to bone after intravenous injection, which were used for diagnostic purposes. The chelating agents disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,553,541 include DTPA, which was formulated in significant molar excess (8-40-fold) over the concentration of .sup.117m Sn (Sn.sup.4+) (i.e., the concentration of total tin) in the radiopharmaceutical composition.

WO 95/29706 discloses .sup.117m Sn (Sn.sup.4+) DTPA compositions for bone pain palliation and bone cancer therapy which employ a molar excess of DTPA over .sup.117m Sn (Sn.sup.+4). WO 95/29706 demonstrates dose-dependent relief of bone pain in humans after administration of .sup.117m Sn (Sn.sup.4+) DTPA, with particular efficacy at doses of about 9 to about 25 mCi per 70 kg body weight. None of the .sup.117m Sn (Sn.sup.4+) DTPA compositions used in WO 95/29706 exhibited bone marrow toxicity, thus providing a significant advantage over the known agents. In a preferred embodiment, CaCl.sub.2 was included with the .sup.117m Sn (Sn.sup.4+) DTPA compositions of WO 95/29706, to inhibit or retard possible hypocalcemic effects of unchelated tin chelating agents.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The improved formulations of .sup.117m Sn (Sn.sup.4+) DTPA and improved methods for making .sup.117m Sn (Sn.sup.4+) DTPA encompassed by the present invention minimize the amount of unchelated DTPA administered to the patient, thereby minimizing potential side effects caused by the presence of unchelated DTPA in the patient's body. The improved .sup.117m Sn (Sn.sup.4+) DTPA formulations of the invention allow lower specific activity .sup.117m Sn (Sn.sup.4+) to be used for bone pain palliation. The present invention also allows higher dosages of .sup.117m Sn (Sn.sup.4+) to be used for treatment of primary and metastatic osseous cancers than was previously possible. The improved .sup.117m Sn (Sn.sup.4+) DTPA formulations of the invention provide greater flexibility in manufacturing and dosage of the therapeutic agent.

In one embodiment, the invention provides a pharmaceutical composition comprising .sup.117m Sn (Sn.sup.4+) at a first molar concentration and DTPA at a second molar concentration, the second molar concentration being from about one to about seven times the first molar concentration.

In another embodiment, the invention provides a method of making a pharmaceutical composition of .sup.117m Sn (Sn.sup.4+) DTPA from a .sup.117m Sn (Sn.sup.4+) DTPA precursor composition, wherein the .sup.117m Sn (Sn.sup.4+) DTPA precursor composition is formed by the steps of dissolving metallic .sup.117m Sn in a concentrated acid; diluting the dissolved .sup.117m Sn to yield a solution of .sup.117m Sn (Sn.sup.2+) having a determinable molar concentration; adding DTPA at a molar concentration from about eight to about twenty times the molar concentration of .sup.117m Sn (Sn.sup.2+); allowing a .sup.117m Sn (Sn.sup.2+) DTPA complex to form; oxidizing the .sup.117m Sn (Sn.sup.2+) DTPA to form a precursor composition containing .sup.117m Sn (Sn.sup.4+) DTPA and uncomplexed DTPA. In the method of the invention, sufficient unchelated DTPA is removed from the .sup.117m Sn (Sn.sup.4+) DTPA precursor composition to yield a pharmaceutical composition comprising .sup.117m Sn (Sn.sup.4+) and DTPA at a molar ratio from about 1:1 to about 1:7.

In yet another embodiment, the invention provides a method of treating bone pain associated with cancer in a human comprising the step of administering to the human a bone pain palliating amount of a pharmaceutical composition comprising .sup.117m Sn (Sn.sup.4+) at a first molar concentration and DTPA at a second molar concentration, the second molar concentration being from about one to about seven times the first molar concentration.

The invention also provides a method of treating a primary or metastatic tumor in skeletal bone of a human comprising the step of administering to the human a therapeutically effective amount of a pharmaceutical composition comprising .sup.117m Sn (Sn.sup.4+) at a first molar concentration and DTPA at a second molar concentration, the second molar concentration being from about one to about seven times the first molar concentration.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

The patent and scientific literature referenced herein establish the knowledge available to those with skill in the art. The issued U.S. patents and allowed applications are hereby incorporated by reference.

The improved .sup.117m Sn (Sn.sup.4+) DTPA formulations of the present invention may be used in the therapeutic and diagnostic methods disclosed in WO 95/29706 and its parent, U.S. application Ser. No. 08/237,003, now abandoned; and in U.S. application Ser. No. 08/743,287.

.sup.117m Sn may be produced for use in the present invention in any manner. For example, .sup.117m Sn may be produced by the .sup.116 Sn(n,.gamma.).sup.117m Sn reaction in a high flux reactor as described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,533,541. .sup.117m Sn may also be produced using the inelastic neutron scattering reaction .sup.117 Sn(n,n'.gamma.).sup.117m Sn in a high flux reactor as disclosed in WO 95/29706, U.S. application Ser. No. 08/237,003, and U.S. application Ser. No. 08/743,287. Alternatively, the .sup.117 Sn(n,n'.gamma.).sup.117m Sn reaction may be performed in any reactor capable of producing neutrons having sufficient energy to effect the reaction, for example, in a low flux reactor although the .sup.117m Sn produced in a low flux reactor will have a lower specific activity than .sup.117m Sn produced in a high flux reactor.

Prior to the present invention, low specific activity .sup.117m Sn (Sn.sup.4+) DTPA was less desirable for use as a radiopharmaccutical than high specific activity .sup.117m Sn (Sn.sup.4+) DTPA, because more of the low specific activity composition would have to be administered to the patient to deliver the dose of radioactivity necessary to effect bone pain palliation or remediation of primary or metastatic osteosarcoma. The presence of high concentrations of unchelated DTPA in the low specific activity .sup.117m Sn (Sn.sup.4+) DTPA composition could limit the amount of the composition that could be administered without toxic effects such as hypocalcemia. Less of the high specific activity .sup.117m Sn (Sn.sup.4+) DTPA composition, and consequently less unchelated DTPA, would be required to administer the required dosage of radioactivity. Because the amount of unchelated DTPA is minimized in the pharmaceutical compositions of the present invention, lower specific activity .sup.117m Sn (Sn.sup.4+) may be employed, both for bone pain palliation and for treatment of osteosarcoma.

The ability to use low specific activity .sup.117m Sn in the pharmaceutical compositions of the present invention provides greater flexibility in manufacturing for several reasons. First, there are a larger number of low flux reactors and cyclotrons than high flux reactors. Second, nuclear reactions other than the presently preferred .sup.117 Sn(n,n' .gamma.).sup.117m Sn reaction may be employed to produce .sup.117m Sn. Moreover, because less unchelated DTPA is present in the pharmaceutical compositions of the invention, high specific activity .sup.117m Sn (Sn.sup.4+) DTPA containing compositions will have a longer shelf life than is presently possible, since a larger number of half-life decays can occur prior to expiration of the product.

.sup.117m Sn may be produced in any way for use in the present invention, for example using any of the methods discussed in Mausner, et al. (1992) Appl. Radiat Isot. 43, 1117-1122. As disclosed in WO 95/29706, enriched .sup.117 Sn may be obtained as an oxide or as the metal, for example, from Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tenn. The former may be converted to the metal by reduction at 600.degree. C. in a hydrogen flow for 2.5 hours. A target may be prepared by sealing 4 to 100 mg of the .sup.117 Sn metal in a quartz ampule. To produce .sup.117m Sn, the target is irradiated in a high flux reactor for periods up to 4 weeks. When .sup.117m Sn is produced in a low flux reactor, the .sup.117 Sn target may be irradiated for periods of more than four weeks. .sup.117m Sn may also be produced in a cyclotron, for example, by the .sup.nat Sb(p,an/a3n).sup.117m Sn reaction or by the .sup.114 Cd(a,n).sup.117m Sn reaction.

The .sup.117m Sn produced as described above may be dissolved in a minimal amount of a concentrated acid such as hydrochloric acid and added to a ten to 45-fold molar excess (over the molar amount of .sup.117m Sn (Sn.sup.2+) in the solution) of an acid salt of DTPA having a pH of about 7. The solution may optionally be heated in a boiling water bath to facilitate complexation, thereby producing .sup.117m Sn (Sn.sup.2+) DTPA. If a heating step is performed, the .sup.117m Sn (Sn.sup.2+) DTPA solution is cooled. An oxidizing agent such as hydrogen peroxide is added to oxidize the .sup.117m Sn (Sn.sup.2+) to .sup.117m Sn (Sn.sup.4+), and oxidation is allowed to proceed for a suitable time, for example, for ten to fifteen minutes when hydrogen peroxide is employed. A slight molar excess of calcium chloride may optionally be added. The resulting solution may be diluted to produce a .sup.117m Sn (Sn.sup.4+) DTPA precursor composition. A significant amount of unchelated DTPA may be present in this precursor composition.

Unchelated DTPA may be removed from the .sup.117m Sn (Sn.sup.4+) DTPA precursor composition using any suitable means. For example, unchelated DTPA may be removed using osmotic means such as dialysis or using chromatographic means. Preferably, a chromatographic means is employed to remove unchelated DTPA from the .sup.117m Sn (Sn.sup.4+) DTPA precursor composition. More preferably, high performance liquid chromatographic means is employed to remove unchelated DTPA from the .sup.117m Sn (Sn.sup.4+) DTPA precursor composition. Most preferably, high performance liquid chromatographic means using an anion exchange resin is used to remove unchelated DTPA from .sup.117m Sn (Sn.sup.4+) DTPA precursor composition.

In accordance with the present invention, a sufficient amount of DTPA is removed from the .sup.117m Sn (Sn.sup.4+) DTPA precursor composition to produce a pharmaceutical composition comprising .sup.117m Sn (Sn.sup.4+) and DTPA at a molar concentration ratio from about one to about seven. That is, in the pharmaceutical composition of the invention, for each mole of .sup.117m Sn (Sn.sup.4+) (or total tin) there will be from about one to about seven moles of DTPA, either chelated to .sup.117m Sn (Sn.sup.4+) or in unchelated form. Preferably, the pharmaceutical composition of the invention will contain from about one to about seven moles of DTPA for each mole of .sup.117m Sn (Sn.sup.4+). More preferably, the pharmaceutical composition of the invention will contain from about one to about four moles of DTPA for each mole of .sup.117m Sn (Sn.sup.4+). Most preferably, the pharmaceutical composition of the invention will contain from about one to about 1.5 moles of DTPA for each mole of .sup.117m Sn (Sn.sup.4+).

The pharmaceutical composition of the invention may optionally include an isotonic vehicle such as Sodium Chloride Injection, Ringer's Injection, Dextrose Injection, Dextrose and Sodium Chloride Injection, Lactated Ringer's Injection, or other vehicle as known in the art. The pharmaceutical composition may also contain stabilizers, preservatives, buffers, or other additives known to those of skill in the art. In accordance with the invention, the pharmaceutical composition comprising .sup.117m Sn (Sn.sup.4+) DTPA at the above-specified molar ratios will be in the form of a pyrogen-free, parenterally acceptable aqueous solution. The preparation of such parenterally acceptable solutions, having due regard to pH, isotonicity, stability, and the like, is within the skill of those in the art. The pharmaceutical composition may also optionally include a suitable calcium salt as a toxicity control agent, as described in WO 95/29706, U.S. application Ser. No. 08/237,003, and U.S. application Ser. No. 08/743,287.

In one embodiment, the pharmaceutical composition of the present invention contains .sup.117m Sn(Sn.sup.4+) having a specific activity from about 0.1 mCi/mg to about 80 Ci/mg. In another embodiment, the pharmaceutical composition of the present invention contains .sup.117m Sn(Sn.sup.4+) having a specific activity from about 2 mCi/mg to about 80 Ci/mg. In yet another embodiment, the pharmaceutical composition of the present invention contains .sup.117m Sn(Sn.sup.4+) having a specific activity from about 2 mCi/mg to about 20 mCi/mg.

In the method of treating bone pain associated with cancer of the invention, a bone pain palliating amount of the pharmaceutical composition described above is administered to a human patient in need of such treatment. As defined herein, a "bone pain palliating amount" means the amount of .sup.117m Sn (Sn.sup.4+) DTPA sufficient to show a meaningful reduction in bone pain as determined by objective means, for example, using the Keele pain scale (Keele, K. D. (1948) Lancet 2, 6-8) or the Karnofsky performance scale (Karnofsky, D. A. (1963) Clin. Pharmacol. Ther., 709-712). It is contemplated that the administered dosage of the pharmaceutical composition for relief of bone pain will be from about 6 mCi .sup.117m Sn (Sn.sup.4+) to about 50 mCi .sup.117m Sn (Sn.sup.4+) per 70 kg body weight (i.e., a total dosage from about 4 mCi to about 130 mCi). Preferably, the administered dosage is from about 10 mCi .sup.117m Sn (Sn.sup.4+) to about 50 mCi .sup.117m Sn (Sn.sup.4+) per 70 kg body weight (a total dosage from about 7 mCi to about 130 mCi). More preferably, the administered dosage is from about 10 mCi .sup.117m Sn (Sn.sup.4+) to about 30 mCi .sup.117m Sn (Sn.sup.4+) per 70 kg body weight (a total dosage from about 7 mCi to about 80 mCi). Most preferably, the administered dosage is from about 12 mCi .sup.117m Sn (Sn.sup.4+) to about 25 mCi .sup.117m Sn (Sn.sup.4+) per 70 kg body weight (a total dosage from about 9 mCi to about 65 mCi). Ultimately, specific treatment regimens appropriate for individual patients will be determined by the attending physician, taking into account the nature and severity of the condition being treated, and the nature of the prior treatments which the patient has undergone.

In the method of treating a primary or metastatic tumor in skeletal bone of the invention, a therapeutically effective amount of the pharmaceutical composition of the invention is administered to a human patient in need of such treatment. As defined herein, a therapeutically effective amount means the total amount of each active component of the pharmaceutical composition that is sufficient to show a meaningful patient benefit, i.e., a reduction in the size of the primary or metastatic tumor or in the incidence of additional metastatic tumors. It is contemplated that the administered dosage of the pharmaceutical composition for treatment of osseous tumors will be from about 10 mCi .sup.117m Sn (Sn.sup.4+) to about 1000 mCi .sup.117m Sn (Sn.sup.4+) per 70 kg body weight (i.e., a total dosage from about 7 mCi to about 1600 mCi). Preferably, the administered dosage is from about 10 mCi .sup.117m Sn (Sn.sup.4+) to about 300 mCi .sup.117m Sn (Sn.sup.4+) per 70 kg body weight (a total dosage from about 7 mCi to about 500 mCi). More preferably, the administered dosage is from about 10 mCi .sup.117m Sn (Sn.sup.4+) to about 100 mCi .sup.117m Sn (Sn.sup.4+) per 70 kg body weight (a total dosage from about 7 mCi to about 150 mCi). Most preferably, the administered dosage is from about 12 mCi .sup.117m Sn (Sn.sup.4+) to about 25 mCi .sup.117m Sn (Sn.sup.4+) per 70 kg body weight (a total dosage from about 9 mCi to about 50 mCi). Ultimately, specific treatment regimens appropriate for individual patients will be determined by the attending physician, taking into account the nature and severity of the condition being treated, and the nature of the prior treatments which the patient has undergone.

In practicing the methods of the present invention, a bone pain palliating amount or a therapeutically effective amount of the pharmaceutical composition is administered to a human, preferably by intravenous injection.

The invention is further described in the examples set forth below, which are intended to illustrate the invention without limiting its scope.

EXAMPLE 1

Preparation of .sup.117m Sn (Sn.sup.4+) DTPA (1:1)

An ampule containing irradiated .sup.117m Sn metal was crushed into a closed system and the metal dissolved in a minimum volume of hot, concentrated HCl. The dissolved .sup.117m Sn (as Sn.sup.2+) was then added to 20 mole equivalents of H.sub.5 DTPA pH adjusted to 7.0. Two mole equivalents of 30% H.sub.2 O.sub.2 was added to the stirred .sup.117m Sn DTPA to oxidize the .sup.117m Sn (Sn.sup.2+) DTPA to .sup.117m Sn (Sn.sup.4+) DTPA. After 10-15 minutes, an aqueous solution containing 1.6 mole equivalents of CaCl.sub.2 was added to the stirred .sup.117m Sn(Sn.sup.4+)DTPA. The solution was diluted to an appropriate volume with water for injection and filtered through an 0.22 .mu.m syringe filter to yield a solution having the following composition: 1.5 mg Sn/mL; 58 mg DTPA/mg Sn; 0.6 mg CaCl.sub.2 /mg Sn.

An 0.1 mL, aliquot of diluted .sup.117m Sn (Sn.sup.4+) DTPA solution containing 0.04 mg Sn and 2.55 mg DTPA was loaded onto a 7.5.times.75 mm Biogel TSK DEAE 5PW anion exchange column (catalog number 125-0661, Biorad, Richmond, Calif.). An inverted parabolic gradient of 0.05 M to 0.4 M phosphate buffer pH 4.5 was applied to the column, and the retention values indicated in Table I were observed:

TABLE 1______________________________________Species Retention Value______________________________________.sup.117m Sn(Sn.sup.4+)DTPA 1 .sup.117m Sn(Sn.sup.2+)DTPA 4.2 DTPA 4.6______________________________________

The .sup.117m Sn (Sn.sup.4+) DTPA eluting at retention value 1 had a molar ratio of DTPA to .sup.117m Sn (Sn.sup.4+) DTPA of 1:1.

The radiochemical purity of the HPLC purified .sup.117m Sn (Sn.sup.4+) DTPA was assayed and compared with that of HPLC purified material to which fourfold and sixfold molar excess DTPA was added. The radiochemical purity of unpurified material was also assayed. Aliquots were spotted on chromatographic paper strips, and were developed with a solution of 1 mg/ml DTPA, pH 5-6. .sup.117m Sn (Sn.sup.4+) DTPA moves with the solvent front, while unhydrolyzed or uncomplexed tin remains at the origin. Results are shown in Table

TABLE 2______________________________________.sup.117m Sn(Sn.sup.4+):DTPA % at Origin % at Solvent Front______________________________________1:1 4.9 90 1:4 0.84 98 1:6 0.25 99 1:20 0.64 97______________________________________ Thus .sup.117m Sn (Sn.sup.4+) DTPA prepared in accordance with the invention has a radiochemical purity greater than or equal to 90%.

EXAMPLE 2

.sup.117m Sn (Sn.sup.4+) DTPA at Various Molar Ratios Biodistribution in Mice

DTPA was added to aliquots of .sup.117m Sn (Sn.sup.4+) DTPA (1:1) prepared in Example 1 to prepare solutions containing .sup.117m Sn (Sn.sup.4+) DTPA at .sup.117m Sn (Sn.sup.4+): DTPA molar concentration ratios of 1:4 and 1:6. .sup.117m Sn (Sn.sup.4+) DTPA at varying molar concentration ratios was injected intravenously into mice (five mice for each molar concentration ratio) and biodistribution at 24 hours was determined for the fresh preparation and also after storage of the material for seven days. Composition which had not been subjected to anion exchange, containing .sup.117m Sn (Sn.sup.4+) DTPA at a molar ratio of 1:20, was used as a control.

The biodistributions of .sup.117m Sn (Sn.sup.4+) DTPA at molar concentrations of 1:1; 1:4; and 1:6 did not differ in blood clearance or total whole body retained activity from that of .sup.117m Sn (Sn.sup.4+) DTPA (1:20). Uptake into various organs, in terms of percent injected dose per gram at 24 hours, is shown in Tables 3 and 4. Bone to tissue ratios for fresh and stored preparations of .sup.117m Sn (Sn.sup.4+) DTPA at the various molar ratios tested are shown in Table 5. From this data, it can be seen that .sup.117m Sn (Sn.sup.4+) DTPA prepared in accordance with the present invention has substantially the same biodistribution for at least seven days after preparation as .sup.117m Sn (Sn.sup.4+) DTPA prepared by previously known methods.

TABLE 3__________________________________________________________________________Biodistribution of .sup.117m Sn(Sn.sup.4+)DTPA (Fresh Preparations) (% Dose/g)__________________________________________________________________________.sup.117m Sn(Sn.sup.4+):DTPA Molar ratio Blood Bone Spleen Stomach Intestines__________________________________________________________________________ 1:1 0.062 .+-. 0.017 17.77 .+-. 0.72 0.34 .+-. 0.08 1.19 .+-. 0.97 0.09 .+-. 0.03 1:4 0.052 .+-. 0.016 18.60 .+-. 2.16 0.30 .+-. 0.12 0.74 .+-. 0.72 0.06 .+-. 0.01 1:6 0.058 .+-. 0.012 16.74 .+-. 1.29 0.24 .+-. 0.06 0.10 .+-. 0.09 0.06 .+-. 0.02 1:20 0.015 .+-. 0.004 17.43 .+-. 2.21 0.08 .+-. 0.02 0.04 .+-. 0.02 0.04 .+-. 0.00__________________________________________________________________________ .sup.117m Sn(Sn.sup.4+):DTPA Molar ratio Liver Kidney Heart Lung Muscle__________________________________________________________________________ 1:1 0.63 .+-. 0.16 1.42 .+-. 0.48 0.11 .+-. 0.04 0.32 .+-. 0.07 0.11 .+-. 0.07 1:4 0.56 .+-. 0.08 0.96 .+-. 0.17 0.09 .+-. 0.04 0.36 .+-. 0.12 0.13 .+-. 0.08 1:6 0.39 .+-. 0.05 0.86 .+-. 0.22 0.11 .+-. 0.10 0.25 .+-. 0.09 0.06 .+-. 0.05 1:20 0.29 .+-. 0.04 0.64 .+-. 0.09 0.05 .+-. 0.01 0.96 .+-. 0.01 0.08 .+-. 0.06__________________________________________________________________________ TABLE 4__________________________________________________________________________Biodistribution of .sup.117m Sn(Sn.sup.4+)DTPA (Stored Preparations) (% Dose/g)__________________________________________________________________________.sup.117m Sn(Sn.sup.4+):DTPA Molar ratio Blood Bone Spleen Stomach Intestines__________________________________________________________________________ 1:1 0.03 .+-. 0.01 16.31 .+-. 2.01 0.202 .+-. 0.034 0.103 .+-. 0.052 0.06 .+-. 0.02 1:4 0.029 .+-. 0.007 17.2 .+-. 3.49 0.388 .+-. 0.096 0.080 .+-. 0.025 0.057 .+-. 0.016 1:6 0.025 .+-. 0.011 17.3 .+-. 0.91 0.12 .+-. 0.05 0.063 .+-. 0.017 0.039 .+-. 0.008 1:20 0.015 .+-. 0.003 19.04 .+-. 1.13 0.070 .+-. 0.02 0.030 .+-. 0.013 0.032 .+-. 0.007__________________________________________________________________________ .sup.117m Sn(Sn.sup.4+):DTPA Molar ratio Liver Kidney Heart Lung Muscle__________________________________________________________________________ 1:1 0.356 .+-. 0.067 0.605 .+-. 0.040 0.110 .+-. 0.037 0.202 .+-. 0.046 0.093 .+-. 0.056 1:4 0.771 .+-. 0.25 0.647 .+-. 0.048 0.092 .+-. 0.026 1.16 .+-. 0.52 0.175 .+-. 0.077 1:6 0.299 .+-. 0.034 0.582 .+-. 0.044 0.091 .+-. 0.024 0.133 .+-. 0.039 0.089 .+-. 0.067 1:20 0.237 .+-. 0.029 0.48 .+-. 0.08 0.035 .+-. 0.007 0.084 .+-. 0.008 0.127 .+-. 0.127__________________________________________________________________________ TABLE 5__________________________________________________________________________Biodistribution of .sup.117m Sn(Sn.sup.4+)DTPA (Bone to Tissue Ratios).sup.117m Sn(Sn.sup.4+):DTPA Molar ratio Blood Spleen Stomach Intestines Liver Kidney Heart Lung Muscle__________________________________________________________________________1:1 (fresh) 291 52 15 193 28 12 163 56 165 1:1 (stored) 544 81 160 272 46 27 148 81 175 1:4 (fresh) 358 63 25 321 33 19 204 53 149 1:4 (stored) 593 44 215 302 22 27 187 15 98 1:6 (fresh) 289 71 163 266 43 19 152 67 284 1:6 (stored) 705 145 275 445 58 30 191 130 195 1:20 (fresh) 1169 215 447 405 60 27 387 182 208 1:20 (stored) 1269 272 635 595 81 40 544 227 150__________________________________________________________________________

It should be understood that the foregoing disclosure emphasizes certain specific embodiments of the invention and that all modifications or equivalents thereto are within the spirit and scope of the invention as set forth in the appended claims.

Claims

1. A pharmaceutical composition comprising .sup.117m Sn (Sn.sup.4+) at a first molar concentration and DTPA at a second molar concentration, the second molar concentration being from about one to seven times the first molar concentration.

2. The composition of claim 1, wherein the second molar concentration is from one to about four times the first molar concentration.

3. The composition of claim 1, wherein the second molar concentration is from one to about 1.5 times the first molar concentration.

4. The composition of claim 1, wherein the .sup.117m Sn (Sn.sup.4+) has a specific activity from about 0.1 mCi/mg to about 80 Ci/mg.

5. The composition of claim 1, wherein the .sup.117m Sn (Sn.sup.4+) has a specific activity from about 2 mCi/mg to about 80 Ci/mg.

6. The composition of claim 1, wherein the .sup.117m Sn (Sn.sup.4+) has a specific activity from about 2 mCi/mg to about 20 mCi/mg.

7. A method of making a pharmaceutical composition of .sup.117m Sn (Sn.sup.4+) DTPA comprising the steps of:

a) dissolving metallic .sup.117m Sn in a concentrated acid;

b) diluting the dissolved .sup.117m Sn to yield a solution of .sup.117m Sn (Sn.sup.2+) having a determinable molar concentration;

c) adding DTPA at a molar concentration from about eight to about twenty times the molar concentration of .sup.117m Sn (Sn.sup.2+);

d) allowing a .sup.117m Sn (Sn.sup.2+) DTPA complex to form;

e) oxidizing the .sup.117m Sn (Sn.sup.2+) DTPA to form a composition containing .sup.117m Sn (Sn.sup.4+) DTPA and uncomplexed DTPA; and

f) removing sufficient unchelated DTPA from the composition to yield a pharmaceutical composition comprising .sup.117m Sn (Sn.sup.4+) and DTPA at a molar concentration ratio from about 1:1 to 1:7.

8. The method of claim 7, wherein the uncomplexed DTPA is removed from the .sup.117m Sn (Sn.sup.4+) DTPA precursor composition by chromatography.

9. The method of claim 8, wherein the chromatography employs an anion exchange resin.

10. In the method of making a pharmaceutical composition of .sup.117m Sn (Sn.sup.4+) DTPA comprising the steps of:

i) dissolving metallic .sup.117m Sn in a concentrated acid;

ii) diluting the dissolved .sup.117m Sn to yield a solution of .sup.117m Sn (Sn.sup.2+) having a determinable molar concentration;

iii) adding DTPA at a molar concentration from about eight to about forty times the molar concentration of .sup.117m Sn (Sn.sup.2+);

iv) allowing a .sup.117m Sn (Sn.sup.2+) DTPA complex to form; and

v) oxidizing the .sup.117m Sn (Sn .sup.2+) DTPA to form a composition containing .sup.117m Sn (Sn.sup.4+) DTPA and uncomplexed DTPA;

the improvement comprising the further step of:

removing sufficient unchelated DTPA from the composition to yield a pharmaceutical composition comprising .sup.117m Sn (Sn.sup.4+) and DTPA at a molar concentration ratio from about 1:1 to 1:7.

11. A method of treating bone pain associated with cancer in a human comprising the step of administering to the human a bone pain palliating amount of a pharmaceutical composition comprising .sup.117m Sn (Sn.sup.4+) at a first molar concentration and DTPA at a second molar concentration, the second molar concentration being from about one to seven times the first molar concentration.

12. The method of claim 11, wherein the second molar concentration is from one to about four times the first molar concentration.

13. The method of claim 11, wherein the second molar concentration is from one to about 1.5 times the first molar concentration.

14. The method of claim 11, wherein the .sup.117m Sn (Sn.sup.4+) has a specific activity from about 0.1 mCi/mg to about 80 Ci/mg.

15. The method of claim 11, wherein the .sup.117m Sn (Sn.sup.4+) has a specific activity from about 2 mCi/mg to about 80 Ci/mg.

16. The method of claim 11, wherein the .sup.117m Sn (Sn.sup.4+) has a specific activity from about 2 mCi/mg to about 20 mCi/mg.

17. A method of treating a primary or metastatic tumor in skeletal bone of a human comprising the step of administering to the human a therapeutically effective amount of a pharmaceutical composition comprising .sup.117m Sn (Sn.sup.4+) at a first molar concentration and DTPA at a second molar concentration, the second molar concentration being from about one to seven times the first molar concentration.

18. The method of claim 17, wherein the second molar concentration is from one to about four times the first molar concentration.

19. The method of claim 17, wherein the second molar concentration is from one to about 1.5 times the first molar concentration.

20. The method of claim 17, wherein the .sup.117m Sn (Sn.sup.4+) has a specific activity from about 0.1 mCi/mg to about 80 Ci/mg.

21. The method of claim 17, wherein the .sup.117m Sn (Sn.sup.4+) has a specific activity from about 2 mCi/mg to about 80 Ci/mg.

22. The method of claim 17, wherein the .sup.117m Sn (Sn.sup.4+) has a specific activity from about 2 mCi/mg to about 20 mCi/mg.