Formulation

[0001] The invention relates to a pharmaceutical formulation, preferably adapted for administration by injection, containing the compound 7α-[9-(4,4,5,5,5-pentafluoropentylsulphinyl)nonyl]oestra-1,3,5(10)-triene-3,17β-diol and an antioxidant, more particularly to a formulation adapted for administration by injection containing the compound 7α-[9-(4,4,5,5,5-pentafluoropentylsulphinyl)nonyl]oestra-1,3,5(10)-triene-3,17β-diol in solution in a ricinoleate vehicle which comprises an antioxidant.

[0002] Oestrogen deprivation is fundamental to the treatment of many benign and malignant diseases of the breast and reproductive tract. In premenopausal women, this is achieved by the ablation of ovarian function through surgical, radiotherapeutic, or medical means, arid, in postmenopausal women, by the use of aromatase inhibitors.

[0003] An alternative approach to oestrogen withdrawal is to antagonise oestrogens with antioestrogens. These are drugs that bind to and compete for oestrogen receptors (ER) present in the nuclei of oestrogen-responsive tissue. Conventional nonsteroidal antioestrogens, such as tamoxifen, compete efficiently for ER binding but their effectiveness is often limited by the partial agonism they display, which results in an incomplete blockade of oestrogen-mediated activity (Furr and Jordan, Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 25:127-206, 1984; May and Westley, 3 Biol Chem 262:15894-15899, 1987).

[0004] The potential for nonsteroidal antioestrogens to display agonistic properties prompted the search for novel compounds that would bind ER with high affinity without activating any of the normal transcriptional hormone responses and consequent manifestations of oestrogens. Such molecules would be “pure” antioestrogens, clearly distinguished from tamoxifen-like ligands and capable of eliciting complete ablation of the trophic effects of oestrogens. Such compounds are referred to as Estrogen Receptor-Downregulators (E.R.D.). The rationale for the design and testing of novel, pure antioestrogens has been described in: Bowler et al 1989, Wakeling 1990a, 1990b, 1990c. Wakeling and Bowler 1987, 1988.

[0005] Steroidal analogues of oestradiol, with an alkylsulphinyl side chain in the 7α position, provided the first examples of compounds devoid of oestrogenic activity (Bowler et al 1989). One of these, 7α-[9-(4,4,5,5,5-pentafluoropentyl sulphinyl)nonyl]oestra-1,3,5-(10)triene-3,17β-diol was selected for intensive study on the basis of its pure oestrogen antagonist activity and significantly increased antioestrogenic potency over other available antioestrogens. In vitro findings and early clinical experience with 7α-[9-(4,4,5,5,5-pentafluoropentylsulphinyl)nonyl]oestra-1,3-5(10)-triene-3,17β-diol have promoted interest in the development of the drug as a therapeutic agent for oestrogen-dependent indications such as breast cancer and certain benign gynaecological conditions.

[0006] 7α-[9-(4,4,5,5,5-Pentafluoropentylsulphinyl)nonyl]oestra-1,3-5(10)-triene-3,17β-diol, or ICI 182,780, has been allocated the international non-proprietary name fulvestrant, which is used hereinafter. When referring to fulvestrant we include pharmaceutically-acceptable salts thereof and any possible solvates of either thereof.

[0007] Fulvestrant binds to ER with an affinity similar to that of oestradiol and completely blocks the growth stimulatory action of oestradiol on human breast cancer cells in vitro; it is more potent and more effective than tamoxifen in this respect. Fulvestrant blocks completely the uterotrophic action of oestradiol in rats, mice and monkeys, and also blocks the uterotrophic activity of tamoxifen.

[0008] Because fulvestrant has none of the oestrogen-like stimulatory activity that is characteristic of clinically available antioestrogens such as tamoxifen or toremifene, it may offer improved therapeutic activity characterised by more rapid, complete, or longer-lasting tumour regression; a lower incidence or rate of development of resistance to treatment; and a reduction of tumour invasiveness.

[0009] European Patent Application No. 0 138 504 discloses that certain steroid derivatives are effective antioestrogenic agents. The disclosure includes information relating to the preparation of the steroid derivatives. In particular there is the disclosure within Example 35 of the compound 71-[9-(4,4,5,5,5-pentafluoropentylsulphinyl)nonyl]oestra-1,3,5(10)-triene-3,17β-diol, which compound is specifically named in claim 4. It is also disclosed that the compounds of that invention may be provided for use in the form of a pharmaceutical composition comprising a steroid derivative of the invention together with a pharmaceutically-acceptable diluent or carrier. It is stated therein that the composition can be in a form suitable for oral or parenteral administration.

[0010] Our earlier filed application PCT/GB01/00049, WO 01/51506, describes certain fulvestrant formulations at a most preferred concentration of 50 mg/ml. There is a need for formulations of fulvestrant to have greater stability on storage. The present invention is based on the discovery that addition of an antioxidant can improve the stability of fulvestrant formulations.

[0011] According to one aspect of the present invention there is provided a pharmaceutical formulation comprising fulvestrant and an antioxidant selected from:

[0012] thiourea;

[0013] tocopherol optionally in the presence of lecithin or ascorbyl palmitate;

[0014] ascorbyl palmitate;

[0015] propyl gallate optionally in the presence of butylated hydroxyanisole or butylated hydroxytoluene;

[0016] dithiothreitol;

[0017] butylated hydroxytoluene;

[0018] dithioerythreitol;

[0019] acetyl cysteine;

[0020] thioglycerol; and

[0021] thioglycolic acid.

[0022] Preferably the antioxidant is selected from:

[0023] thiourea;

[0024] tocopherol optionally in the presence of lecithin or ascorbyl palmitate;

[0025] ascorbyl palmitate;

[0026] propyl gallate optionally in the presence of butylated hydroxyanisole or butylated hydroxytoluene; and

[0027] dithiothreitol.

[0028] More preferably the antioxidant is selected from:

[0029] thiourea;

[0030] tocopherol optionally in the presence of lecithin or ascorbyl palmitate;

[0031] propyl gallate optionally in the presence of butylated hydroxyanisole; and

[0032] ascorbyl palmitate.

[0033] More preferably the antioxidant is selected from:

[0034] thiourea; and

[0035] tocopherol optionally in the presence of lecithin or ascorbyl palmitate.

[0036] More preferably the antioxidant is selected from:

[0037] thiourea; and

[0038] tocopherol in the presence of lecithin.

[0039] Most preferably the antioxidant is thiourea.

[0040] Preferably the formulation is adapted for intramuscular administration.

[0041] Preferably the formulation comprises a ricinoleate excipient, a pharmaceutically acceptable non-aqueous ester solvent and a pharmaceutically acceptable alcohol.

[0042] Preferably the pharmaceutically-acceptable alcohol is a mixture of ethanol and benzyl alcohol.

[0043] Preferably the pharmaceutically-acceptable non-aqueous ester solvent is selected from benzyl benzoate, ethyl oleate, isopropyl myristate, isopropyl palmitate or a mixture of any thereof. More preferably the pharmaceutically-acceptable non-aqueous ester solvent is benzyl benzoate.

[0044] According to another aspect of the invention there is provided a unit dose of a to pharmaceutical formulation as described herein wherein the total amount of fulvestrant in the formulation is 250 mg, or more, and the total volume of the formulation is 6 ml, or less.

[0045] Preferably the pharmaceutically-acceptable alcohol is a mixture of 10% weight of ethanol per volume of formulation, 10% weight of benzyl alcohol per volume of formulation and 15% weight of benzyl benzoate per volume of formulation and the ricinoleate vehicle is castor oil.

[0046] More preferably the pharmaceutical formulation comprises an antioxidant selected from:

[0047] 0.05% weight of thiourea per volume of formulation; or

[0048] 0.075% weight of tocopherol per volume of formulation and 2.3% weight of lecithin per volume of formulation.

[0049] Another aspect of the invention provides a pharmaceutical formulation as defined herein for use in medical therapy.

[0050] Another aspect of the invention provides use of fulvestrant in the preparation of a pharmaceutical formulation as defined herein for the treatment of a benign or malignant disease of the breast or reproductive tract.

[0051] According to one aspect of the present invention there is provided a pharmaceutical formulation adapted for intramuscular administration comprising fulvestrant and an antioxidant selected from ascorbyl palmitate, butylated hydroxyanisole, butylated hydroxytoluene, malic acid, propyl gallate, sodium bisulfite, sodium sulfite, sodium metabisulfite, potassium metabisulfite, potassium bisulfite, sodium thiosulfate, sodium formaldehyde sulfoxylate, L-ascorbic acid, D-ascorbic acid, acetylcysteine, cysteine, thioglycerol, thioglycollic acid, thiolactic acid, thiourea, dithiothreitol, ditioerythreitol, glutathione, nordihydroguaiaretic acid, tocopherol and fumaric acid.

[0052] Preferably the antioxidant is selected from ascorbyl palmitate, butylated hydroxyanisole, butylated hydroxytoluene, malic acid, propyl gallate, tocopherol, fumaric acid, sodium ascorbate, sodium metabisulfite and ascorbic acid. More preferably the antioxidant is selected from ascorbyl palmitate, butylated hydroxyanisole, butylated hydroxytoluene, malic acid, propyl gallate, tocopherol and fumaric acid. More preferably the antioxidant is selected from ascorbyl palmitate, butylated hydroxyanisole, butylated hydroxytoluene, malic acid and propyl gallate. More preferably the antioxidant is selected from ascorbyl palmitate, butylated hydroxyanisole, butylated hydroxytoluene and propyl gallate. More preferably the antioxidant is selected from ascorbyl palmitate, butylated hydroxyanisole and propyl gallate. More preferably the antioxidant is selected from butylated hydroxyanisole and propyl gallate. Most preferably, the antioxidant is butylated hydroxyanisole especially at a concentration of about 0.03%.

[0053] Preferably a pharmaceutical formulation of the invention comprises a ricinoleate excipient, a pharmaceutically acceptable non-aqueous ester solvent and a pharmaceutically acceptable alcohol. Preferably the pharmaceutically-acceptable alcohol is a mixture of ethanol and benzyl alcohol. Preferably the pharmaceutically-acceptable non-aqueous ester solvent is selected from benzyl benzoate, ethyl oleate, isopropyl myristate, isopropyl palmitate or a mixture of any thereof. More preferably the pharmaceutically-acceptable non-aqueous ester solvent is benzyl benzoate.

[0054] According to another aspect of the present invention there is provided a unit dose of a pharmaceutical formulation as described herein wherein the total amount of fulvestrant in the formulation is 250 mg, or more, and the total volume of the formulation is 6 ml, or less.

[0055] A preferred pharmaceutical formulation is one wherein the pharmaceutically-acceptable alcohol is a mixture of 10% weight of ethanol per volume of formulation, 10% weight of benzyl alcohol per volume of formulation and 15% weight of benzyl benzoate per volume of formulation and the ricinoleate vehicle is castor oil.

[0056] Another aspect of the invention provides a pharmaceutical formulation adapted for intramuscular injection as defined herein for use in medical therapy.

[0057] Another aspect of the invention provides use of fulvestrant in the preparation of a pharmaceutical formulation as defined in any preceding claim for the treatment of a benign or malignant disease of the breast or reproductive tract.

[0058] For the avoidance of any doubt when using the term % weight per volume of formulation for the constituents of the formulation we mean that within a unit volume of the formulation a certain percentage of the constituent by weight will be present, for example a 1% weight per volume formulation will contain within a 100 ml volume of formulation 1 g of the constituent. By way of further illustration

1% of x by weight pervolume of formulationweight of x in 1 ml of formulation30%300 mg20%200 mg10%100 mg5% 50 mg1% 10 mg

[0059] It is appreciated that in the formulation an excess of formulation may be included to allow the attendant physician or care giver to be able to deliver the required dose. Therefore, when a 5 ml dose is required it would be appreciated that an excess of up to 0.25 ml, preferably up to 0.15 ml will also be present in the formulation. Typically the formulation will be presented in a vial or a prefilled syringe, preferably a prefilled syringe, containing a unit dosage of the formulation as described herein, these being further features of the invention.

[0060] It will be understood by the skilled person that the pharmaceutically-acceptable alcohol will be of a quality such that it will meet pharmacopoeial standards (such as are described in the US, British, European and Japanese pharmacopoeias) and as such will contain some water and possibly other organic solvents, for example ethanol in the US Pharmacopeia contains not less than 94.9% by volume and not more Dan 96.0% by volume of ethanol when measured at 15.56° C. Dehydrated alcohol in the US Pharmacopeia contains not less than 99.5% ethanol by volume when measured at 15.56° C.

[0061] It will be understood by the skilled person that the pharmaceutically-acceptable non-aqueous ester solvent will be of a quality that it will meet pharmacopoeial standards (such as described in the US, British, European and Japanese pharmacopoeias).

[0062] Additional excipients commonly used in the formulation field including, for example, a colorant or a surfactant may be used. A preferred optional excipient is a surfactant.

[0063] Another aspect of the invention is the addition of a synergistic compound to the formulations described herein to further improve the performance thereof Examples of synergistic compounds are set out below.

[0064] Combinations of Antioxidants which Demonstrate Antioxidant Synergy

2AntioxidantSynergistic CompoundAcetylcysteineAscorbic AcidTocopherolLecithinTocopherolAscorbyl PalmitateButylated HydroxyanisoleCitric AcidButylated HydroxytolueneMalic AcidPropyl GallateButylated HydroxyanisolePropyl GallateButylated Hydroxytoluene

[0065] Other Compounds which are Antioxidant Synergists

[0066] Ethylenediametetraacetic Acid (EDTA)+its sodium and calcium salts

[0067] Citric Acid

[0068] Phosphoric Acid

[0069] Tartaric Acid

[0070] PVP

[0071] Lecithin

[0072] Glycerin

[0073] Propylene Glycol

[0074] Polyethylene Glycol

[0075] Polysorbates

[0076] Glycine

[0077] Cysteine

[0078] Tryptophan

[0079] The synergist can be an antioxidant or a compound which in itself does not protect oxygen sensitive drugs but when combined with an antioxidant, increases the stability of the drug to oxidation.

[0080] In addition to fulvestrant another similar type of molecule is currently under clinical investigation. SH-646 (11β-fluoro-7α-(14,14,15,15,15-pentafluoro-6-methyl-10-thia-6-azapentadecyl)estra-1,3,5(10)-triene-3,17β-diol) is also putatively a compound with the same mode of action as fulvestrant and has a very similar chemical structure. It is believed that the compound will also share with fulvestrant similar physical properties and therefore the current invention will also have application with this compound.

[0081] Further features of the invention are those as described above but in which SH-646 is substituted for fulvestrant.

[0082] References

[0083] 1. Bowler J, Lilley T J, Pittam J D, Wakeling A E. Novel steroidal pure antioestrogens. Steroids, 54: 71-100, 1989.

[0084] 2. Wakeling A E. Novel pure antioestrogens: mode of action and therapeutic prospects. American New York Academy Science 1990a; 595: 348-56.

[0085] 3. Wakeling A E. Steroidal pure antioestrogens. In Lippman M, Dickson R, editors. Regulatory mechanisms in breast cancer. Boston: Kluwer Academic, 1990b: 239-57.

[0086] 4. Wakeling A E. Therapeutic potential of pure antioestrogens in the treatment of breast cancer. Journal Steroid Biochemistry 1990c; 37: 771-5.

[0087] 5. Wakeling A E, Bowler J. Steroidal pure antioestrogens. Journal Endocrinology 1987; 112: R7-10.

[0088] 6. Wakeling A E, Bowler J. Biology and mode of action of pure antioestrogens. Journal Steroid Biochemistry 1988; 3: 141-7.

[0089] The invention is illustrated below with respect to the following non-limiting Examples.

EXAMPLE 1

[0090] Effect of Antioxidants on Stability

[0091] To analyse the following samples of fulvestrant formulations for levels of fulvestrant sulphone by HPLC. The formulations have been stored at 80° C. and contain antioxidants which are intended to suppress formation of fulvestrant sulphone. To assess the effect of the antioxidants on formation of fulvestrant sulphone the results will be compared with a reference sample containing no antioxidant and stored at 80° C. The following basic formulation was used: fulvestrant 50 mg/ml, ethanol 10% w/v, benzylalcohol 10% w/v, benzyl benzoate 15% w/v and made to volume with castor oil.

3TABLE 1Sample Details.ADMAntioxidant and Storage Conditions82843D01No antioxidant, 80° C., no nitrogen82844A01No antioxidant, 80° C., no nitrogen82845I01No antioxidant, 4° C., under nitrogen82846F01No antioxidant, 4° C., under nitrogen82848K010.02% Ascorbyl Palmitate, 80° C., no nitrogen82849H010.02% Ascorbyl Palmitate, 80° C., no nitrogen82851F010.03% Butylated Hydroxyanisole, 80° C., no nitrogen82852C010.03% Butylated Hydroxyanisole, 80° C., no nitrogen82854H010.03% Butylated Hydroxytoluene, 80° C., no nitrogen82855E010.03% Butylated Hydroxytoluene, 80° C., no nitrogen82857J010.02% Malic Acid, 80° C., no nitrogen82858G010.02% Malic Acid, 80° C., no nitrogen82860E010.01% Propyl Gallate, 80° C., no nitrogen82861B010.01% Propyl Gallate, 80° C., no nitrogen

[0092] Results

[0093] A single sample preparation and single injection was performed on each of the above samples. Due to leakage of the vials at the high storage temperature the fulvestrant content of the samples could not be assumed to be the same in each vial. Therefore, the level of fulvestrant sulphone in each sample was calculated using an external fulvestrant reference standard and also relative to the fulvestrant content of the sample itself. Both sets of results are shown below.

4TABLE 2Fulvestrant Sulphone content (% w/w) determined againstan external fulvestrant analytical reference standard.FulvestrantFulvestrantsulphoneFormulation and Storagesulphone(meanConditionsADM(% w/w)% w/w)No antioxidant, 80° C., no1. 82843D014.7794.94nitrogen2. 82844A015.092No antioxidant, 4° C., under1. 82845I010.2020.20nitrogen2. 82846F010.1880.02% Ascorbyl Palmitate,1. 82848K013.5303.2880° C., no nitrogen2. 82849H013.0350.03% Butylated1. 82851F011.7562.28Hydroxyanisole, 80° C., no2. 82852C012.794nitrogen0.03% Butylated1. 82854H013.4243.53Hydroxytoluene, 80° C., no2. 82855E013.628nitrogen0.02% Malic Acid, 80° C., no1. 82857J014.1294.00nitrogen2. 82858G013.8800.01% Propyl Gallate, 80° C.,1. 82860E013.0403.33no nitrogen 82861B013.620

[0094]

5

TABLE 3

Fulvestrant Sulphone content (area %) relative

to the fulvestrant content of the sample.

Fulvestrant

Fulvestrant
Sulphone

Formulation and Storage

Sulphone
(mean

Conditions
ADM
(area %)
area %)

No antioxidant, 80° C., no
1. 82843D01
4.020
4.03

nitrogen
2. 82844A01
4.035

No antioxidant, 4° C., under
1. 82845I01
0.187
0.18

nitrogen
2. 82846F01
0.176

0.02% Ascorbyl Palmitate,
1. 82848K01
2.750
2.70

80° C., no nitrogen
2. 82849H01
2.644

0.03% Butylated
1. 82851F01
1.435
1.79

Hydroxyanisole, 80° C., no
2. 82852C01
2.145

nitrogen

0.03% Butylated
1. 82854H01
2.996
2.78

Hydroxytoluene, 80° C., no
2. 82855E01
2.561

nitrogen

0.02% Malic Acid, 80° C., no
1. 82857J01
3.658
3.29

nitrogen
2. 82858G01
2.196

0.01% Propyl Gallate, 80° C.,
1. 82860E01
2.136
2.40

no nitrogen
2. 82861B01
2.661

[0095] Conclusion

[0096] The results indicate that the addition of an antioxidant to the fulvestrant formulation reduces formation of fulvestrant sulphone by between 1-2% w/w, when compared to a formulation stored under the same conditions in the absence of antioxidant. The lowest level of fulvestrant sulphone was observed with the use of butylated hydroxyanisole. None of the antioxidants co-eluted with the fulvestrant or the fulvestrant sulphone peaks,

EXAMPLE 2

[0097] Formulation

[0098] Fulvestrant is mixed with alcohol and benzyl alcohol, stirring until completely dissolved. Benzyl benzoate is added and the solution is made to final weight with castor oil and stirred, (for convenience weight is used rather than volume by using the weight to volume ratio). The bulk solution is overlaid with nitrogen. The solution is sterilised by filtration using one or two filters of 0.2 μm porosity. The sterile filtrate is kept under a nitrogen overlay as it is filled under aseptic conditions into washed and depyrogenised, sterile primary containers, for example vials or pre-filled syringes An overage is included in the primary pack to facilitate removal of the dose volume. The primary packs are overlaid with sterile nitrogen, before aseptically sealing.

[0099] See Also Process Flow Diagram below

[0100] Quantities of each component of the formulation is chosen according to the required formulation specification, examples are described above. For example quantities are added of each component to prepare a formulation which contains

[0101] 10% weight per volume of benzyl alcohol

[0102] 10% weight per volume of ethanol

[0103] 15% weight per volume of benzyl benzoate

[0104] 0.03% weight per volume of butylated hydroxyanisole (added at same time as alcohols in the flow diagram)

[0105] 250 mg of fulvestrant for each 5 ml of finished formulation and the remaining amount as castor oil.

EXAMPLE 3

[0106] Stability Study at 40° C./75% Relative Humidity with Antioxidants 3.1 Introduction

[0107] Antioxidants are intended to suppress the formation of oxidative degradation products. This Example describes a stability study to investigate the level of degradation products, particularly Fulvestrant Sulphone (the main degradation product of fulvestrant and is formed by oxidation) formed with and without an antioxidant. The formulations were stored at 40° C./75% RH and analysed at 1 month. A range of pharmaceutically acceptable antioxidants are used as well as antioxidants with synergists. “RH” means relative humidity and the percentage relative humidity may be defined as: (Vapour pressure of water vapour in the air/Vapour pressure of water vapour in air saturated at the same temperature)*100; see Pharmaceutics The Science of Dosage Form Design., Aulton, M. E. (Ed), Churchill Livingstone, 2002.

[0108] The 80° C. accelerated stability study described in Example 1 may not be completely indicative of actual/realistic storage conditions. Although storing the formulations at 40° C./75% RH provides an accelerated study, the conditions are more realistic and thought to give a more accurate indication of the ability of an antioxidant to prevent oxidation of fulvestrant. Storage at 40° C./75% RH was therefore employed in this study

[0109] To assess the effect of the antioxidant on the formation of Fulvestrant Sulphone, the results were compared with a control sample containing no antioxidant and stored under the same conditions, with or without nitrogen overlay. The following basic formulation was used: Fulvestrant 50 mg/ml, Ethanol 10% w/v, Benzyl alcohol 10% w/v, Benzyl benzoate 15% w/v and made up to volume with castor oil.

[0110] All samples used in the study were filled into 5 ml vials with a fill volume of 2.5 ml to maximise headspace. The purpose of the study is:

[0111] i) To determine the level of Fulvestrant Sulphone and other degradation products in each formulation

[0112] ii) To assess the effectiveness of the antioxidant in suppressing the formation of Fulvestrant Sulphone and other degradation products, and thus the degradation of Fulvestrant.

6Ingredients% w/vFulvestrant5.0Ethanol 96% BP10.0Benzyl alcohol PhEur10.0Benzyl benzoate PhEur15.0AntioxidantvariableCastor Oil PhEurTo 100%

[0113] List of Formulations Containing Antioxidants

7Formu-lation%%CodeAntioxidantconcSynergistconcA1Ascorbyl palmitate0.02A2Butylated Hydroxyanisole0.03A3Butylated Hydroxytoluene0.03A4Malic Acid0.02A5Propyl Gallate0.1A7Acetylcysteine0.5A9Thioglycerol1.0A10Thioglycolic Acid0.5A11Thiourea0.05A12Dithiothreitol0.1A13Dithioerythreitol0.1A14Delta Tocopherol0.075A16Delta Tocopherol0.075Lecithin2.3A17Delta Tocopherol0.075Ascorbyl Palmitate0.02A18Butylated Hydroxyanisole0.03Citric Acid2.0A19Butylated Hydroxytoluene0.03Malic Acid0.02A20Propyl Gallate0.1Butylated0.03HydroxyanisoleA21Propyl Gallate0.1Butylated0.03HydroxytolueneA23(CONTROL with nitrogenoverlay)A24(CONTROL)

[0114] 3.4 Method of Manufacture

[0115] Manufacture 50 ml of each proposed formulation as follows:

[0116] 1. Dissolve antioxidant & Fulvestrant in Ethanol

[0117] 2. Add Benzyl Alcohol

[0118] 3. Add Benzyl Benzoate and mix

[0119] 4. Add Castor Oil to volume and mix

[0120] 5. Pre-purge vials with Nitrogen, Fill solution into 5 ml vials (Fill volume 2.5 mls), overlay with Nitrogen.*

[0121] 6. Seal with ETFE coated stoppers

[0122] 7. Crimp and label vials.

[0123] *-Nitrogen overlay with control sample A23 only.

[0124] 3.5 Storage Protocol

[0125] All formulations (A1-A24) listed above were placed on test at 40° C./75% RH. Testing was performed on all formulations initially and after 1 month of storage at 40° C./75% RH. All vials were stored upright.

[0126] 3.6 Testing Protocol

[0127] The levels of degradation products (Fulvestrant Sulphone, unknown degradation products and total degradation products) were determined by HPLC for the initial and 1 month time-point using the following reversed-phase HPLC method.

[0128] Equipment

[0129] Apparatus: A suitable liquid chromatograph equipped with a column heater, autosampler/injector, LW detector and a pump with gradient capability

[0130] Column: 15 cm×4.6 mm internal diameter packed with 3.5 μm USP packing type L7, such as Symmetry C8 or equivalent

[0131] Chromatographic Conditions

8Eluent AMethanol270 mlAcetonitrile320 mlEluent BMethanol410 mlAcetonitrile490 mlGradient programmeTime (min)Eluent A (%)Eluent B (%)01000251000550100650100Flow rateApproximately 2 ml/minMonitoring wavelength225 nmInjection volume10 μlColumn temperature40° C.Data collection time155 min1Data collection is stopped at 55 minutes as significant baseline disturbance occurs after this time due to the gradient.

[0132] Retention Data

[0133] The relative retention times of fulvestrant and fulvestrant sulphone are given below.

9TABLERelative retention timesApproximate retentionApproximate relativeComponenttime (minutes)retention time (RRT)Fulvestrant21—Fulvestrant Sulphone251.21

[0134]

10

3.7 Results

CONDITION40 C/75% RH Initial & 4 week time point

Sample

A1
A2
A4
A7
A9

Degradation Products
Initial
4 week
Initial
4 week
Initial
4 week
Initial
4 week
Initial
4 week

Fulvestrant Sulphone
0.09
0.25
0.08
0.39
0.11
0.37
0.07
0.08
0.05
0.05

Highest Other
0.05
0.08
0.05
0.24
0.05
<0.05
0.18
1.21
0.12
2.93

Total Deg Products
0.19 (3)
0.33 (2)
0.18 (3)
1.02 (7)
0.21 (3)
0.37
0.43 (5)
1.54
0.27 (4)
3.06 (3)

(5)

Visual
NT
OK
NT
OK
NT
OK
NT
OK
NT
OK

Sample

A10
A11
A12
A13
A14

Degradation Products
Initial
4 week
Initial
4 week
Initial
4 week
Initial
4 week
Initial
4 week

Fulvestrant Sulphone
0.06
0.09
0.05
<0.05
0.07
0.08
0.06
0.07
0.08
0.2

Highest Other
0.38
4.22
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.3
0.05
0.47
0.05
<0.05

Total Deg Products
0.73 (6)
4.65 (7)
0.15 (3)
0.05
0.17 (3)
0.38 (2)
0.16 (3)
0.54
0.17 (3)
0.2

(2)

Visual
NT
OK
NT
OK
NT
OK
NT
OK
NT
OK

Sample

A3
A5
A16
A17
A18

Degradation Products
Initial
4 week
Initial
4 week
Initial
4 week
Initial
4 week
Initial
4 week

Fulvestrant Sulphone
0.11
0.18
0.06
0.11
0.07
0.17
0.1
0.26
0.09
0.75

Highest Other
0.11
0.19
0.09
<0.05
0.05
<0.05
0.06
<0.05
0.05
0.5

Total Deg Products
0.32 (4)
0.5*
0.20 (3)
0.11
0.22 (4)
0.17
0.21 (3)
0.26
0.14 (2)
3.52 (16)

Visual
NT
OK
NT
Fails
NT
OK
NT
OK
NT
Fails

Sample

A23

CONTROL
A24

A19
A20
A21
(N2)
CONTROL

Degradation Products
Initial
4 week
Initial
4 week
Initial
4 week
Initial
4 week
Initial
4 week

Fulvestrant Sulphone
0.14
0.35
0.06
0.11
0.1
0.15
0.08
0.36
0.08
0.34

Highest Other
0.05
0.06
0.05
0
0.06
0.1
0.05
0
0.05
0

Total Deg Products
0.29 (4)
0.47 (3)
0.16 (3)
0.11
0.26 (4)
0.31 (3)
0.18 (3)
0.36
0.18
0.34

Visual
NT
OK
NT
Fails
NT
Fails
NT
OK
NT
OK

*RRT 1.61 of 0.35% w/w (Beta-isomer retention time) not included in total deg. Products

() = number of degradation products in sample

NT = not tested

RH = relative humidity

Highest other = highest degradation product other than sulphone

[0135]

11

3.8 Analysis - Ranking by Sulphone concentration

Sulphone

Levels

Rank
Formulation No.
Antioxidant 1
Synergist
Initial
4 weeks
Change in levels
Conclusion

A23
N2
N/A
0.08
0.36
0.28

A24
NONE
N/A
0.08
0.34
0.26

1
A11
Thlourea
N/A
0.05
<0.05
<0
better N2

2
A9
Thloglycerol
N/A
0.05
0.05
0
better N2

3
A13
Dithioerythreitol
N/A
0.06
0.07
0.01
better N2

4
A12
Dithiothreitol
N/A
0.07
0.08
0.01
better N2

5
A7
Acetylcysteine
N/A
0.07
0.08
0.01
better N2

6
A10
Thioglycolic Acid
N/A
0.06
0.09
0.03
better N2

7
A5
Propyl Gallate
N/A
0.06
0.11
0.05
better N2

8
A20
Propyl Gallate
BHA
0.06
0.11
0.05
better N2

9
A21
Propyl Gallate
BHT
0.1
0.15
0.05
better N2

10
A16
Delta Tocopherol
Lecithin
0.07
0.17
0.1
better N2

11
A3
BHT
N/A
0.11
0.18
0.07
better N2

12
A14
Delta Tocopherol
N/A
0.08
0.2
0.12
better N2

13
A1
Ascorbyl Palmitate
N/A
0.09
0.25
0.16
better N2

14
A17
Delta Tocopherol
Ascorbyl Palmitate
0.1
0.26
0.16
better N2

15
A19
BHT
Malic acid
0.14
0.35
0.21
equal N2

16
A4
Malic Acid
N/A
0.11
0.37
0.26
equal N2

17
A2
BHA
N/A
0.08
0.39
0.31
equal N2

18
A18
BHA
Citric Acid
0.09
0.75
0.66
worse N2

N2 = nitrogen

BHT = butylated hydroxytoluene

BHA = butylated hydroxyanisole

N/A = not applicable

[0136]

12

3.9 Analysis - Ranking by Total Degradation Products

Total

Degradation

Products

Rank
Formulation No.
Antioxidant 1
Synergist
Initial
4 weeks
Change in levels
Conclusion

A23
N2
N/A
0.18
0.36
0.18

A24
NONE
N/A
0.18
0.34
0.16

1
A11
Thiourea
N/A
0.15
0.05
−0.1
better N2

2
A5
Propyl Gallate
N/A
0.2
0.11
−0.09
better N2

3
A20
Propyl Gallate
BHA
0.16
0.11
−0.05
better N2

4
A16
Delta Tocopherol
Lecithin
0.22
0.17
−0.05
better N2

5
A14
Delta Tocopherol
N/A
0.17
0.2
0.03
better N2

6
A17
Delta Tocopherol
Ascorbyl
0.21
0.26
0.05
better N2

Palmitate

7
A21
Propyl Gallate
BHT
0.26
0.31
0.05
equal N2

8
A1
Ascorbyl
N/A
0.19
0.33
0.14
equal N2

Palmitate

9
A4
Malic Acid
N/A
0.21
0.37
0.16
equal N2

10
A12
Dithiothreitol
N/A
0.17
0.38
0.21
equal N2

11
A19
BHT
Malic
0.29
0.47
0.18
worse N2

acid

12
A3
BHT
N/A
0.32
0.5
0.18
worse N2

13
A13
Dithioerythreitol
N/A
0.16
0.54
0.38
worse N2

14
A2
BHA
N/A
0.18
1.02
0.84
worse N2

15
A7
Acetylcysteine
N/A
0.43
1.54
1.11
worse N2

16
A9
Thioglycerol
N/A
0.27
3.06
2.79
worse N2

17
A18
BHA
Citric
0.14
3.52
3.38
worse N2

Acid

18
A10
Thioglycolic Acid
N/A
0.73
4.65
3.92
worse N2

[0137]

13

3.10 Analysis - Formulations with Sulphone levels < Control

and Total Degradation Products < or Equal to Control

Total

Sulphone
Degradation

Levels
Products

Formulation No.
Antioxidant 1
Synergist
Initial
4 weeks
Initial
4 weeks
Conclusion

A23
N2
N/A
0.08
0.36
0.18
0.36

A24
NONE
N/A
0.08
0.34
0.18
0.34

A11
Thiourea
N/A
0.05
<0.05
0.15
0.05
sulphone & total deg < control

A16
Delta Tocopherol
Lecithin
0.07
0.17
0.22
0.17
sulphone & total deg < control

A14
Delta Tocopherol
N/A
0.08
0.2
0.17
0.2
sulphone & total deg < control

A17
Delta Tocopherol
Ascorbyl Palmitate
0.1
0.26
0.21
0.26
sulphone & total deg < control

A5
Propyl Gallate
N/A
0.06
0.11
0.2
0.11
sulphone & total deg < control

A20
Propyl Gallate
BHA
0.06
0.11
0.16
0.11
sulphone & total deg < control

A1
Ascorbyl Palmitate
N/A
0.09
0.25
0.19
0.33
sulphone < control, total deg = control

A12
Dithiothreitol
N/A
0.07
0.08
0.17
0.38
sulphone < control, total deg = control

A21
Propyl Gallate
BHT
0.1
0.15
0.26
0.31
sulphone < control, total deg = control

[0138]

14

3.11 Analysis - Ranking by ‘Highest Other’ Degradation Product

Highest

other

degradation

product

Rank
Formulation No.
Antioxidant 1
Synergist
Initial
4 weeks
Conclusion

A23
N2
N/A
0.05
0

A24
NONE
N/A
0.05
0

1
A20
Propyl Gallate
BHA
0.05
0
equal N2

2
A4
Malic Acid
N/A
0.05
<0.05
equal N2

3
A5
Propyl Gallate
N/A
0.09
<0.05
equal N2

4
A16
Delta Tocopherol
Lecithin
0.05
<0.05
equal N2

5
A14
Delta Tocopherol
N/A
0.05
<0.05
equal N2

6
A17
Delta Tocopherol
Ascorbyl Palmitate
0.06
<0.05
equal N2

7
A11
Thiourea
N/A
0.05
0.05
equal N2

8
A19
BHT
Malic acid
0.05
0.06
equal N2

9
A1
Ascorbyl Palmitate
N/A
0.05
0.08
equal N2

10
A21
Propyl Gallate
BHT
0.06
0.1
equal N2

11
A3
BHT
N/A
0.11
0.19
worse N2

12
A2
BHA
N/A
0.05
0.24
worse N2

13
A12
Dithiothreitol
N/A
0.05
0.3
worse N2

14
A13
Dithioerythreitol
N/A
0.05
0.47
worse N2

15
A18
BHA
Citric Acid
0.05
0.5
worse N2

16
A7
Acetylcysteine
N/A
0.18
1.21
worse N2

17
A9
Thioglycerol
N/A
0.12
2.93
worse N2

18
A10
Thioglycolic Acid
N/A
0.38
4.22
worse N2

[0139] 3.12 Overall Analysis

15FormulationSulphoneHighest OtherTotalVisualA1+++++A2+−−+A3++−−+A4++++A5+++++−A7++−−+A9++−−+A10++−−+A11++++++A12++−++A13++−−+A14++++++A16++++++A17++++++A18−−−−A19++−+A20+++++−A21++++−

[0140] Code for: ++=better than control; −=worse than control; +=approximately same as control

[0141] Taking into account the summary above and the numerical results together, we conclude with the following rank order the best 14 formulations (out of the 18 tested), the best being listed first:

[0142] A11>A16>A14>A17>A1>A5, A20>A21>A12>A3>A13>A7>A9>A10

EXAMPLE 4

[0143] Optimisation of the Antioxidant Content

[0144] Optimisation of the antioxidant content can be conducted as follows. Formulations containing a range of antioxidant concentrations below the level previously shown to be effective (e.g. 0.01-0.05 for thiourea) are placed on stability at 4° C., 25° C. and 40° C./75% RH for 3 months. The levels of fulvestrant sulphone, total degradation products and highest other degradation products are determined in the initial samples, and after 1 and 3 months of storage. Comparison of the levels of degradation products determines the minimum effective level of antioixidant required. Note excipent concentrations should preferably be minimised for parenteral formulations.

[0145] For formulations containing higher fulvestrant content (for example, 150 mg/ml) the optimum level of antioxidant as determined previously may be added to the formulation. The formulation is placed on stability study at 4° C., 25° C. and 40° C./75% RH for 3 months and the levels of fulvestrant sulphone, total degradation products and highest other degradation products determined. Should this level of antioxidant be sub-optimal to control oxidation of the fulvestrant, increased levels of the antioxidant may be tested up to the maximum level of antioxidant deemed to be appropriate for incorporation into the product.

Formulation

Information

Publication Number

Date Filed

Date Published

Inventors

CPC

US Classifications

International Classifications

Abstract

Description

Claims

Priority Claims (1)

PCT Information