This section is intended to provide background information to facilitate a better understanding of various technologies described herein. As the section's title implies, this is a discussion of related art. That such art is related in no way implies that it is prior art. The related art may or may not be prior art. It should therefore be understood that the statements in this section are to be read in this light, and not as admissions of prior art.
Formwork systems have been used as a tool to help builders construct concrete structures. Many different pre-engineered modern formwork systems have been developed to mold liquid concrete into building systems. These systems have continued to develop in the last several decades to become more efficient, allowing contractors to help reduce overall construction costs, and to reduce schedule completion times.
There are many companies in existence today that have developed specific formwork systems and carry a sizable inventory, which can be both rented and sold to contractors who build concrete structures. The applications of formwork are unlimited given the wide range of project types in both the industrial and commercial construction markets. From high rise buildings to the construction of an industrial facility, formwork is used to help contractors cast foundations, columns, walls, and elevated slabs in an enormous variety of shapes and uses. Chances are that all of the places people live and work have some form of poured concrete that was cast using a formwork system. There is a substantial market for formwork in the construction industry worldwide.
Prior to the 1980's, older generation systems required providers to have a large inventory of parts available to fit any configuration. They consisted of endless amounts of form panels, filler sizes, small bolts, pins, and other connecting hardware, that are used for assembly by a building contractor. The amount of inventoried items was high and the assembly efficiency for contractors was low. Because of the amount of pieces, it was common for many of these items to be lost during the construction process. Starting in the late 1980's, newer modular formwork system designs developed by international companies started hitting the worldwide market, and were subsequently introduced into the U.S.
These modular systems were being produced primarily out of Europe, required many less inventory items, eliminated small bolts and pins, and maintained a high degree of versatility. European systems began to migrate over to the Americas, and started to dominate the market, making the older systems in the U.S. virtually obsolete. Today, we see more and more of these systems hitting the ground in the U.S., but they were designed and built to service an international market, primarily outside the Americas. There is virtually no modern system in use today that is built for specific use in the U.S. These systems are generally manufactured in metric building units, which require additional components to convert to the U.S. Imperial unit of measure. In addition, they require a distinctly different inventory to build both straight and curved wall construction.
Described herein are various implementations of a formwork system. In one implementation, the formwork system includes aluminum extrusions and aluminum castings. The aluminum castings and the aluminum extrusions can be assembled by being pressed and riveted together.
In one implementation, the aluminum extrusions can be side rail extrusions. In one implementation, the aluminum extrusions can be interior rail extrusions. The aluminum extrusions and the aluminum castings can be made of structural grade aluminum.
In one implementation, the aluminum extrusions and aluminum castings may be integrated into a shoring deck application.
Described herein are various implementations for a formwork system. In one implementation, the formwork system includes a first formwork panel having a first standard panel width. The formwork system also includes a second formwork panel having a second standard panel width different from the first panel width. The formwork system further includes an adjustable filler assembly.
In one implementation, the adjustable filler assembly includes two filler side rails and at least one adjustable inner rail. In another implementation, the adjustable filler assembly includes two filler side rails and radius cut lumber. In another implementation, the adjustable filler assembly includes two filler side rails and straight lumber.
Described herein are various implementations for an aluminum formwork system. The aluminum formwork system includes a clamp having: a first member having a first opening configured to accommodate a first flange; a second member having a second opening configured to accommodate a second flange; and a connector clip attached to the clamp and configured to be coupled to one or more attachments for the aluminum formwork system.
In one implementation, an accessory clip is attached to the connector clip. The accessory clip can be coupled to the one or more attachments.
The one or more attachments may include, but are not limited to, a pipe brace clip, an alignment bar, a lifting bar, and/or a tie-off point.
In one implementation, the first flange and the second flange are part of an inner rail. In another implementation, the first flange is part of a first side rail and the second flange is part of a second side rail. The first side rail and the second side rail may be connected by tightening the clamp.
The clamp can be a standard clamp that couples formwork panels and couples attachments to the formwork panels.
In one implementation, the formwork system includes a plurality of standard formwork panels. Each of the plurality of standard formwork panels has a respective height. The plurality of standard formwork panels have tie holes. The tie holes are configured to be symmetrical for all of the respective heights of the plurality of formwork panels.
In one implementation, the standard formwork panels are constructed of lightweight aluminum extrusions and fittings that are assembled with mechanical fasteners and have no welding.
In one implementation, various adjustable filler components are used to create on-demand filler panels sizes in a wide range of odd dimensional configurations, to meet dimensional requirements. This eliminates the need to carry an inventory of various pre-set sizes of filler panels and small shims.
In one implementation, a windmill overlap outside corner bracket is used to form outside corners of walls or columns.
In one implementation, standard form panels have the optional ability to increase the base design capacity by inserting a high pressure strut in critical locations where design pressures are higher than standard limits.
In one implementation, the formwork system includes aluminum extruded hinged corner extrusions having a first side and a second side. A first formwork panel is coupled to the first side of the hinged corner extrusion. A second formwork panel is coupled to the second side of the hinged corner extrusion. The hinged corner extrusion is configurable to position the first formwork panel and the second formwork panel at a plurality of angles. In one implementation, the aluminum extruded hinged corner extrusion comprises a hinged inside corner extrusion. In one implementation, the hinged corner extrusion comprises a hinged outside corner extrusion.
In one implementation, tie inserts are used with a formwork panel. Tie inserts may include self-sealing ties, tie plugs and tie inserts that install from the outside (or backside) of ganged form panel assemblies. This increases labor efficiency and reduces risk of concrete leakage through the tie port assembly.
In one implementation, Ringlok scaffolding is standardized as the access component of the formwork system. In one implementation, the same components also function as a moveable personal tie-off point accessory.
In one implementation, a dual purpose bracket can be used to both operate as a dry tie bracket and a hold down bracket. As a hold down bracket, the bracket is used to tie forms down to a base slab from vertical uplift loads. As a dry tie bracket, the bracket is used to place a dry tie over the top of the form.
In one implementation, standard clamps are used to connect one form panel to all adjacent panels, fillers or corners. The standard clamp also serves as the attachment point for all other accessories to the form panel, with the addition of the standard accessory clip vs. attaching accessories directly to the panels with various adaptor fixtures.
Described herein are various implementations of a method of assembling a formwork system. Aluminum extrusions are provided. Aluminum castings are provided. The aluminum castings and aluminum extrusions are pressed and riveted.
The aluminum extrusions can be side rail extrusions and/or interior rail extrusions. The aluminum extrusions and the aluminum castings can be made of structural grade aluminum.
In one implementation, the formwork system can be configured such that the aluminum extrusions and aluminum castings are integrated into a shoring deck application.
In one implementation, the aluminum extrusions are adjustable and a width of the aluminum extrusions can be incrementally adjusted using different configurations.
The aluminum extrusions can be assembled to be part of a series or system of formwork panels that are coupled together using a standard clamp. The formwork panels are constructed of lightweight aluminum extrusions and fittings and are assembled with mechanical fasteners and have no welding. The standard clamp may also be used to couple attachments to the formwork panels. In one implementation, a connector clip can be attached to the standard clamp and configured to be coupled to one or more attachments for the formwork system. In one implementation, an accessory clip can be attached to the connector clip. The accessory clip can be coupled to the one or more attachments. The attachments may include, but are not limited to, a pipe brace clip, an alignment bar, a lifting bar, a tie-off point.
In one implementation, formwork panels can be coupled via an aluminum extruded hinged corner extrusion and configured to be positioned relative to each other at a plurality of angles.
In one implementation, the aluminum extruded hinged corner extrusion can be a hinged inside corner extrusion. In one implementation, the hinged corner extrusion can be a hinged outside corner extrusion.
In one implementation, tie inserts are used with a formwork panel. Tie inserts may include self-sealing ties, tie plugs and tie inserts that install from the outside (or backside) of ganged form panel assemblies. This increases labor efficiency and reduces risk of concrete leakage through the tie port assembly. A tie nut and rod assembly can be used to couple a formwork panel to an opposing formwork panel.
The above referenced summary section is provided to introduce a selection of concepts in a simplified form that are further described below in the detailed description section. Additional concepts and various other implementations are also described in the detailed description. The summary is not intended to identify key features or essential features of the claimed subject matter, nor is it intended to be used to limit the scope of the claimed subject matter, nor is it intended to limit the number of inventions described herein. Furthermore, the claimed subject matter is not limited to implementations that solve any or all disadvantages noted in any part of this disclosure.
Implementations of various techniques will hereafter be described with reference to the accompanying drawings. It should be understood, however, that the accompanying drawings illustrate only the various implementations described herein and are not meant to limit the scope of various techniques described herein.
The formwork system of the present disclosure has been designed to rectify many of the short comings of imported European formwork systems, provides a further reduction in the amount of components needed, and provides a high degree of versatility. In one implementation, the formwork system may be built from non-welded lightweight aluminum components. The present formwork system may also have implementations that include a synthetic form face. Most prior art systems are made from welded rolled steel, and use a wood form face that has to be replaced periodically. The unique design and manufacture of the new formwork system of the present disclosure vastly elevates the inventory service life, improves aspects of inventory maintenance, and offers a significant reduction in the amount of different components needed to achieve an enormous variety of usable configurations. Various unique features of the present formwork system are described in more detail below.
The present formwork system design includes several key unique features that are not found in similar systems currently available in the market. The improvement provided by this new formwork system, which may be composed of non-welded aluminum components, is that this formwork system has significantly less components in its usable inventory, as compared to prior art formwork systems. The present formwork system also has a unique approach to the type of materials used in its construction, as well as the method of assembly and manufacture. The present formwork system may also be configured to be used in shoring deck applications. The combination of minimizing required components and the unique method of manufacture is what separates the present formwork system from prior art formwork systems currently being offered to the construction industry.
The present formwork system reduces the amount of inventoried components by over 75%, as compared to existing systems. The main driver to eliminate many infrequently used items is the use of the fabricated Filler Side Rail in various applications. In combination with the robust nature of the materials of the present formwork system and the method of assembly, the cost to own the present formwork system can vastly be reduced for both a dead asset basis, as well as the physical maintenance cost required to maintain a formwork inventory. In addition, the present formwork system elevates the flexibility to handle field applications, as well as increase the efficiency for the contractors that will use the present formwork system to build concrete structures.
As illustrated in
As illustrated in
As illustrated in
As illustrated in
A dry tie or hold down bracket 130 and an alignment center support 132a are included in
An outside corner bracket configuration 134 is also shown in
Standard clamp 2508a is the primary method of attaching all accessories to the standard form panels. Standard clamp 2508a may also be used to tie formwork panels having different heights and as a lifting device for a series of ganged formwork panels. Also illustrated (in
Element 2510 is a standard LD and HD pipe brace with a clip assembly.
Element 2512 is a turnbuckle brace with a clip assembly. Pipe brace 2510 can be used to provide support for scaffolding. Turnbuckle brace 2512 can be used to provide support for a formwork panel.
The accessory clip 2514a attaches to the standard clamp and serves as a standard connection for the alignment bar configuration (using alignment bar 2520), personal tie-off point (using Ringlok adaptor 2516a), pipe brace attachment (using pipe brace 2510), and lifting bar configuration (using gang lifting configuration 2522). Also illustrated (in
When used as a personal tie-off point, Ringlok adaptor 2516a can be attached to inner rails of the formwork panels. Scaffold assembly 2524 includes a pin-lock scaffold bracket and post 2523 and includes a Ringlok adaptor 2516a, Ringlok leg material 2517 and two standard clamps 2508a coupled to the pin-lock scaffold bracket and post 2523. Also illustrated (in
Standard adjustable shear wall bracket 2526 is used to support the weight of the form panels and fillers in a shear wall or exterior wall condition.
A dry tie or hold down bracket 2528 is included in
A self-sealing tie and color-coded insert system 2530 is included in
An outside corner bracket configuration 2534 is also shown in
Different views of the tie extrusion 3225 are shown in
Filler side rails 3422a can be used in both lumber and adjustable filler configurations. An opposing end 3422b of filler side rail 3422a is illustrated in
The side rail 532, interior rails 536, corner castings 3242, and tie extrusion 3225 are made of structural grade aluminum. In one implementation, the structural grade aluminum can be 6060-T6 or equivalent.
On another side of adjustable filler panel 4102, illustrates an optional tie assembly showing the tie rod 4140 passes through a permanent insert 4150 and a she-bolt 4145 inserted into the permanent insert 4150. The tie rod 4140 is secured to the panel using she bolt 4145 and a wing nut, not shown. The tie rod is used to tie one panel to an opposing panel. Also shown at panel 4104, which is serially attached to panel 4102, is a plug insert 4135 inserted into permanent insert 4130.
On another side of adjustable filler panel 4202, the optional tie assembly includes a tie rod 4205 and a wing nut (not shown). The tie rod 4205 passes through a permanent insert 4215 and a cone tie insert 4220 inserted into the permanent insert 4215. The tie rod 4205 further passes through a PVC sleeve 4225 attached to the cone tie insert 4220. The optional tie rod is used to tie one panel to an opposing panel. Also shown at panel 4204, which is serially attached to panel 4202, is a plug insert 4235 inserted into permanent insert 4230.
Once formwork is set, tie inserts and the tie rod are assembled and slide into position from a back side of the panel. On the opposite panel that receives the tie rod, the tie inserts are also assembled from the back side of this panel.
Hinged inside corner 2504 includes a first member 4330 and a second member 4335. In a 90 degree configuration, a 90 degree strap 4340 is used. The 90 degree strap 4340 may be attached to the first member 4330 and the second member 4335 using screw and nut 4342 or some other attachment means.
In one implementation, instead of using screw and nut 4342, an adaptor plate (not shown) can be permanently mounted to each extrusion using bolts, and the 90 degree strap can be attached to the adaptor plate using pull pins. In this implementation, the 90 degree strap is easier to remove when an angle that is greater or less than 90 degrees is needed.
A top view of first member 4310 is shown in
The configuration in
In one implementation, the stripping inside corner is adjusted from a pour position to a stripping position using either a screw mechanism (not shown) or a slotted slide plate (not shown) that draws the two sides of the inside stripping corner inward to strip and outward to re-set to the next pour position. In one implementation, the stripping inside corner can be made from aluminum and includes a slide plate configuration.
Hold down bracket application 5530 includes tie rod 5540, anchor bolt 5545, bracket 2528 and panel 5525. Bracket 2528 is attached to a bottom portion of formwork panel 5525 and is tied to surface 5535 using tie rod 5540 and anchor bolt 5545.
The aluminum extrusions can be side rail extrusions and/or interior rail extrusions. The aluminum extrusions and the aluminum castings can be made of structural grade aluminum.
In one implementation, the formwork system can be configured such that the aluminum extrusions and aluminum castings are integrated into a shoring deck application.
In one implementation, the aluminum extrusions are adjustable and a width of the aluminum extrusions can be incrementally adjusted using different configurations.
The aluminum extrusions can be assembled to be part of a series or system of formwork panels that are coupled together using a standard clamp. The formwork panels are constructed of lightweight aluminum extrusions and fittings and are assembled with mechanical fasteners and have no welding. The standard clamp may also be used to couple attachments to the formwork panels. In one implementation, a connector clip can be attached to the standard clamp and configured to be coupled to one or more attachments for the formwork system. In one implementation, an accessory clip can be attached to the connector clip. The accessory clip can be coupled to the one or more attachments. The attachments may include, but are not limited to, a pipe brace clip, an alignment bar, a lifting bar, a tie-off point.
In one implementation, formwork panels can be coupled via an aluminum extruded hinged corner extrusion and configured to be positioned relative to each other at a plurality of angles.
In one implementation, the aluminum extruded hinged corner extrusion can be a hinged inside corner extrusion. In one implementation, the hinged corner extrusion can be a hinged outside corner extrusion.
In one implementation, tie inserts are used with a formwork panel. Tie inserts may include self-sealing ties, tie plugs and tie inserts that install from the outside (or backside) of ganged form panel assemblies. This increases labor efficiency and reduces risk of concrete leakage through the tie port assembly. A tie nut and rod assembly can be used to couple a formwork panel to an opposing formwork panel.
The design of the present formwork system includes several key unique features that are not found in prior art systems. Below are descriptions of these aspects:
Aluminum Extrusions & Castings vs. Welded Rolled Steel
All of the systems in use today are fabricated from rolled steel shapes, and are welded together to construct the formwork frame. While this approach may be cost effective to manufacture, it generally has its drawbacks with regard to inventory maintenance costs, as well as long term product performance. Light weight rolled steel components can wear over time, causing issues with components fitting together properly, which often creates assembly issues for contractors on the jobsite. In general, galvanized welded steel frames will eventually rust after continued exposure to chemicals present in concrete, as well as from the caustic environment on jobsites where these systems are used.
In one implementation, the formwork system of the present disclosure is constructed solely of aluminum extrusions and castings in a fashion that eliminates structural welding. This simplifies both the manufacturing, as well as the inventory maintenance aspects of a purchased inventory.
The structural capacity is generated from having the castings pressed into the extrusions. The corner castings are press fitted into the side rail extrusions and either riveted, or screwed together. The tie hole fitting, e.g., the tie extrusion, is bolted to the side rail and press fitted and bolted into the interior rail. The result of this type of assembly provides a more rigid and consistently truer frame with a higher level of durability. Since the extrusions, i.e., side rails and inner rails, tie hole fittings and castings of the formwork system are aluminum, these elements will not rust and will maintain their structural rigidity for longer periods of time, as compared to traditional welded steel types.
In one implementation, the corner casting provides added durability to help prevent damage during normal construction activities. In another implementation, the side rail extrusions are shaped to help prevent typical handling damage patterns by having specific areas thicker than those in protected areas (e.g., outer edges or walls are thicker).
The thicker areas may provide protection against weather and/or damage due to construction workers or other mishaps that may occur on a construction site. There is no prior art system that is constructed in this manner.
Wall Tie Pattern and Frequency
All formwork systems require a tie system of some sort, to hold the panels on one side of a concrete wall to those on the opposite side. The liquid concrete causes pressure on the form face that push the forms apart. Form ties are used to hold the forms together to prevent movement and to allow the casting to maintain the intended shape.
Most prior art systems have a pre-defined pattern that provides limited amounts of flexibility. Additionally, prior art systems do not allow a form of two different heights to be connected on opposite sides of the wall in a fashion that allows staggering. For example, in prior art systems, the spacing of the tie holes on a shorter form are different from those on a taller height forms. This forces builders to use the same height forms on both sides of the wall, which limits the amount of configurations that a system can achieve.
There are frequent situations that require a user to have higher forms on one side of the wall vs. the other. The tie pattern of the present system allows ties to be placed in predefined increments, e.g., 12″ increments. This symmetrical tie spacing feature allows panels to be stacked and staggered in a variety of patterns from one side of the wall to the other. This exponentially increases the versatility of the product and reduces the amount of components needed.
Standard Panel Widths with an Adjustable Filler Assembly and a Variable Width Lumber Filler Assembly Vs. Prior Art Multiple Sized Panel Widths
Generally, most prior art systems offer a variety of pre-manufactured panel and filler sizes so the system will have enough dimensional flexibility to handle the wide range of field conditions. Given that most formwork applications generally use a small percentage of filler components in relation to standard panels, the formwork owner is forced to maintain a large inventory of various size filler panels in the event one particular size may be needed over another. This causes the owner to invest in seldom used assets in order to maintain dimensional flexibility.
This new system takes a very different approach, and has only two distinct panel widths. Secondly, this system has a pre-fabricated filler side rail accessory that allows users to custom build fillers to meet the size requirements for each specific application. One additional component that allows the user to have fillers of variable widths significantly reduces the amount of items to inventory. Variable fillers can be pre-assembled prior to shipment to meet the design specifications, or easily custom made in the field to handle dimensional changes from one pour to the next.
The design of the present side rail, e.g., an aluminum filler side rail, allows making custom filler sizes feasible. This component allows the user, or form provider, to easily insert standard sized wood members to create custom sized filler panel that perform in the same manner as standard panels. The filler panels attach to the primary components in the same way as the rest of the standard system, and also have the same tie hole configurations. This gives builders the same dimensional flexibility as other systems, while significantly reducing inventory components. One set of filler side rails eliminate the need for the form owner to carry large amounts of pre-fabricated and seldom used small filler panels. In addition, the filler side rails may be made or fabricated on a per order basis.
In one implementation, the filler side rail assembly will also be used for circular construction, and for walls that intersect at other than right angles. These conditions are two more examples of infrequent applications that create inventory inefficiencies as well.
This system also includes an adjustable filler assembly. This adjustable filler assembly is capable of handling a majority of straight wall filler applications. Using the adjustable filler assembly (and the lumber assembly) eliminates the necessity in the prior art of having fabricated fillers of various sizes. The adjustable filler reduces the amount of custom wood expense and time needed to fill a customer order. Using the adjustable filler assembly reduces the need for all wood inner members with a new aluminum adjustable inner member, so that the most common filler sizes can be achieved with the same frame assembly. This adjustable filler assembly is unique to the present system.
In this system, filler side rails are designed to accept lumber inner rails, however, a much smaller quantity will be needed in practice. The lumber configurations will be used primarily for odd fillers that aren't achievable using the other standard adjustable components and to make curved formwork. The lumber filler side rail uses the same side rail design as the adjustable filler, with the addition of a lumber clip, and removal of the adjustable inner rail.
Ability to Form Circular Walls without Having a Secondary Curved Inventory
Another infrequent use of formwork is on circular concrete walls or columns. In addition to the uses for the filler side rail noted above, this component also allows the form owner to custom build curved wall forms or circular column forms by inserting radius shaped dimensional lumber, similar to assembling variable sized fillers.
Given the advancements of computer numerical control (CNC) cutting technology, custom shaping of large quantities of wood members make this approach very practical. Through the use of CNC technology, variable radiuses similar to filler shown in
Standard Clamp Connector with Attachments Vs. Multiple Clamp Types
All modern modular formwork systems use a clamping device to connect one form panel to the next. However, most, if not all, prior art systems use various configurations of clamps for specific purposes. Most have a standard clamp for the majority of connections, a second alignment clamp to maintain in line straightness for a series of panels connected end to end, and an adjustable clamp that is used when wood shims are required to make small dimensional adjustments.
The design of the clamp for the present system eliminates the need for multiple clamps because the clamp of the present system has attachment ports. The ports allow various items to be connected to the clamp, such as a simple piece of angle or wood, which can be used as an alignment bar, in straight wall applications. This aspect significantly reduces the inventory costs for clamps. Secondly, given that the present system uses side rails, e.g., aluminum filler side rails, to make variable sized filler, the need for the small wood shims of the prior art system is eliminated. Therefore, the adjustable style of clamp of the prior art is also eliminated.
The present system uses one style of clamp for connecting forms in a straight line. In contrast, prior art systems on the market today require three or more clamp varieties.
Windmill Outside Corner Connectors Vs. Modified Panels to Allow Overlapped Connections
When forming walls or columns, one item that is constantly needed is a right angle panel overlap corner. Most, if not all, prior art systems use full height special fabricated form panels, made in the same heights as the other form panels, with additional tie holes spaced to connect the overlapping panels at various increments. Formwork users who require right angle outside corners using prior art systems must carry an inventory of variable height special overlap forms to meet this requirement.
The present formwork system eliminates the special overlap form panels with the addition of the windmill outside corner connector, see
Using the windmill outside corner bracket eliminates the need for an inventory of specialty panels with additional tie holes that are used to make windmill outside corner assemblies.
Variable Angled Inside and Outside Aluminum Extruded Corners with a 90 Degree Strap Vs Fabricated Steel Corners of Both 90 Degree and Hinged Types
Most prior art systems use both a fabricated steel hinged design and a separate 90 degree angle design for both inside and outside corners components. Fabricated steel is very heavy and having both a different hinged and 90 degree fabrication for both the inside and outside corners increases the amount of components required for the system.
The present formwork system utilizes an aluminum extruded hinged corner, with a standard 90 degree strap to make up variable angled corners, as well as right angles for both the inside and outside corner designs of various heights. Both the hinged and 90 degree corners configurations can be manufactured separately out of aluminum extrusions for this system. However, it is not necessary, given the design of much lighter hinged aluminum extruded corners and the addition of a 90-degree strap, shown in
Integrated Standard Scaffolding Components Vs. Specific Components for Access
Most prior art formwork systems have components, such as scaffold brackets, that are used for workers to access the formwork during assembly, as well as to perform the placement of the concrete inside the formwork. These prior art scaffold brackets have specifically designed components that only work for that particular formwork system.
The present formwork system does not have those specially designed components. Instead, the present formwork system has simple attachment accessories that allow existing types of standard scaffolding components to be utilized. Standard scaffolding systems are readily available in the market place, and are generally made in a standard configuration that integrates with the present formwork system.
Most companies that will own this formwork, more than likely will own some sort of system scaffolding. Whether this is the case or not, this approach allows these companies to separately purchase those scaffolding components that match with the fabricated attachments on the present formwork system. The attachment accessories of the present formwork system eliminate components that would only service one construction system, and reduce the amount of equipment investment for seldom used items.
Synthetic Form Face Vs. Plywood Form Face
As mentioned above, most prior art formwork systems use a plywood based form face. The form face is the key feature that holds the liquid concrete in the shape desired. In general, a wood form face wears down frequently and has to be replaced during periodic maintenance activities. In one implementation, the formwork system described in this document may utilize a synthetic face product solely for the standard panels.
Given that the standard panels will form the bulk of the formwork inventory, using synthetic facing will significantly reduce formwork maintenance costs and virtually eliminate the need to periodically replace form faces on the standard panels.
This aspect adds to the overall robust nature of the present formwork system design and helps to reduce the overall cost to own and maintain this formwork system versus prior art systems.
In addition to the details highlighted above, the following additional improvements are discussed below:
Self-Sealing Form Tie System with Color Coded Inserts: This enhancement allows all of the ties and inserts to be assembled from the outside of the form panel. Once in place, the tie cavity is sealed so concrete will not leak into the opening. This is a significant labor savings and product maintenance improvement. There are two tie options 1) She-Bolt with Inner Rod; and 2) Yellow Insert w/ PVC Sleeve & re-usable through rod. Both options use the same size threaded rod & Wing Nut washer.
Aluminum Design on Corners: All of the inside and outside standard right angle & hinged corners can be made of an aluminum extrusion with a bolt-on 90 degree strap, instead of fabricated steel. Using aluminum eliminates the need for welding and makes these parts much lighter and capable of handling various corner angles. Note: the stripping corner can still be steel, however, this stripping corner can be reduced in size from 12″×12″ to 8″×8″. In one implementation, an aluminum stripping corner with a center slide plate mechanism that can pull the sides of the stripping corner inward so that the complete form system can be stripped and moved as an entire unit.
Enhanced design on the adjustable fillers: A changed rail configuration is provided. The adjustable filler elements have interlocking grooves on the inner & outer overlapping splice members to limit deflection and increase capacity.
The scaffold attachments for the standard Ringlok system were enhanced. The attachments can also be configured as a personnel tie-off point.
Removable high pressure strut: a removable high pressure strut (not shown) for the standard panels can be included. This removable high pressure strut can be made using the adjustable rail extrusions and allows for an increase in the allowable design pressure by reducing deflection on the form face. Most prior art systems upgrade their core design to handle extreme pressures, but the downside is an overdesign for day to day common uses. The approach of the present disclosure minimizes component weights and allows for adding the strut in locations where pressures become high, as opposed to the entire system. This is similar in concept to having a moveable personal tie-off point for optimal placement based on the need. This component can be used with the standard panels when the construction application dictates.
The discussion above is directed to certain specific implementations. It is to be understood that the discussion above is only for the purpose of enabling a person with ordinary skill in the art to make and use any subject matter defined now or later by the patent “claims” found in any issued patent herein.
It is specifically intended that the claimed invention not be limited to the implementations and illustrations contained herein, but include modified forms of those implementations including portions of the implementations and combinations of elements of different implementations as come within the scope of the following claims. It should be appreciated that in the development of any such actual implementation, as in any engineering or design project, numerous implementation-specific decisions may be made to achieve the developers' specific goals, such as compliance with system-related and business related constraints, which may vary from one implementation to another. Moreover, it should be appreciated that such a development effort might be complex and time consuming, but would nevertheless be a routine undertaking of design, fabrication, and manufacture for those of ordinary skill having the benefit of this disclosure. Nothing in this application is considered critical or essential to the claimed invention unless explicitly indicated as being “critical” or “essential.”
In the above detailed description, numerous specific details were set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the present disclosure. However, it will be apparent to one of ordinary skill in the art that the present disclosure may be practiced without these specific details. In other instances, well-known methods, procedures, components, circuits and networks have not been described in detail so as not to unnecessarily obscure aspects of the embodiments.
It will also be understood that, although the terms first, second, etc. may be used herein to describe various elements, these elements should not be limited by these terms. These terms are only used to distinguish one element from another. For example, a first object or step could be termed a second object or step, and, similarly, a second object or step could be termed a first object or step, without departing from the scope of the invention. The first object or step, and the second object or step, are both objects or steps, respectively, but they are not to be considered the same object or step.
The terminology used in the description of the present disclosure herein is for the purpose of describing particular implementations only and is not intended to be limiting of the present disclosure. As used in the description of the present disclosure and the appended claims, the singular forms “a,” “an” and “the” are intended to include the plural forms as well, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise. It will also be understood that the term “and/or” as used herein refers to and encompasses any and all possible combinations of one or more of the associated listed items. It will be further understood that the terms “includes,” “including,” “comprises” and/or “comprising,” when used in this specification, specify the presence of stated features, integers, steps, operations, elements, and/or components, but do not preclude the presence or addition of one or more other features, integers, steps, operations, elements, components and/or groups thereof.
As used herein, the term “if” may be construed to mean “when” or “upon” or “in response to determining” or “in response to detecting,” depending on the context. Similarly, the phrase “if it is determined” or “if [a stated condition or event] is detected” may be construed to mean “upon determining” or “in response to determining” or “upon detecting [the stated condition or event]” or “in response to detecting [the stated condition or event],” depending on the context. As used herein, the terms “up” and “down”; “upper” and “lower”; “upwardly” and downwardly”; “below” and “above”; and other similar terms indicating relative positions above or below a given point or element may be used in connection with some implementations of various technologies described herein.
While the foregoing is directed to implementations of various techniques described herein, other and further implementations may be devised without departing from the basic scope thereof, which may be determined by the claims that follow. Although the subject matter has been described in language specific to structural features and/or methodological acts, it is to be understood that the subject matter defined in the appended claims is not necessarily limited to the specific features or acts described above. Rather, the specific features and acts described above are disclosed as example forms of implementing the claims.
This application is a divisional application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/680,368, filed Nov. 11, 2019, which is a divisional application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/630,923, filed Jun. 22, 2017, which claims the benefit of and priority to U.S. Patent Application Ser. Nos. 62/471,173, filed Mar. 14, 2017 and 62/354,325, filed Jun. 24, 2016, the disclosures of which are herein incorporated by reference in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
559931 | Campbell | May 1896 | A |
1163188 | Waite | Dec 1915 | A |
1176005 | Waite | Mar 1916 | A |
1473504 | Neely | Nov 1923 | A |
1575268 | Howard | Mar 1926 | A |
1653126 | Schwerin | Dec 1927 | A |
RE17629 | Wehr | Mar 1930 | E |
1768543 | Clausing | Jul 1930 | A |
1890336 | Nodine | Dec 1932 | A |
1890386 | Kingston | Dec 1932 | A |
1919405 | Wilson | Jul 1933 | A |
1970547 | Anderon | Aug 1934 | A |
1974628 | Donald | Sep 1934 | A |
1974752 | Roberg | Sep 1934 | A |
2261907 | Uecker et al. | Nov 1941 | A |
2382201 | Burke et al. | Aug 1945 | A |
2479962 | Paulson | Aug 1949 | A |
2573086 | Yoshimoto, Sr. | Oct 1951 | A |
2631346 | Wengen | Mar 1953 | A |
2760249 | Woodrow | Aug 1956 | A |
2804673 | Fex | Sep 1957 | A |
2877974 | Estes | Mar 1959 | A |
2944120 | Ruben | Jul 1960 | A |
2970677 | Springs, Jr. et al. | Feb 1961 | A |
2974762 | Mauritz | Mar 1961 | A |
2976597 | Bert | Mar 1961 | A |
3005282 | Christiansen | Oct 1961 | A |
3018898 | Frazelle | Jan 1962 | A |
3054486 | Rambelje | Sep 1962 | A |
3077653 | Ward | Feb 1963 | A |
3124330 | Robinson | Mar 1964 | A |
3168772 | Williams | Feb 1965 | A |
3204918 | Bonin | Sep 1965 | A |
3217833 | Smith | Nov 1965 | A |
3222829 | Bening | Dec 1965 | A |
3247639 | Dela | Apr 1966 | A |
3288427 | Pluckebaum | Nov 1966 | A |
3318057 | Norsworthy | May 1967 | A |
3325957 | Demeules | Jun 1967 | A |
3392801 | Gethmann | Jul 1968 | A |
3420012 | Liskey, Jr. et al. | Jan 1969 | A |
3462110 | Cheslock | Aug 1969 | A |
3465995 | Whitman | Sep 1969 | A |
3486287 | Guillon | Dec 1969 | A |
3491852 | Leist | Jan 1970 | A |
3493208 | Sato | Feb 1970 | A |
3533587 | Carr | Oct 1970 | A |
3550723 | Gentry et al. | Dec 1970 | A |
3559357 | Lowe | Feb 1971 | A |
3578060 | Spencer | May 1971 | A |
3601356 | Yurick | Aug 1971 | A |
3684058 | Brown | Aug 1972 | A |
3696578 | Swensen et al. | Oct 1972 | A |
3735953 | Dashew | May 1973 | A |
3751790 | Frazier | Aug 1973 | A |
3776498 | Peters | Dec 1973 | A |
3790117 | Winkler | Feb 1974 | A |
3815858 | Mocny et al. | Jun 1974 | A |
3822850 | Elias | Jul 1974 | A |
3862737 | Fuston, Jr. | Jan 1975 | A |
3876046 | Lerner | Apr 1975 | A |
3885648 | Beziat | May 1975 | A |
3890750 | Berman | Jun 1975 | A |
3900179 | Mocny et al. | Aug 1975 | A |
3900182 | Berman | Aug 1975 | A |
3993282 | Berman | Nov 1976 | A |
4003543 | Doubleday | Jan 1977 | A |
4030266 | Cody | Jun 1977 | A |
4030694 | Schimmel | Jun 1977 | A |
4032100 | Kahn | Jun 1977 | A |
4033081 | Perkins, Jr. | Jul 1977 | A |
4036466 | Van Meter | Jul 1977 | A |
4102096 | Cody | Jul 1978 | A |
4106256 | Cody | Aug 1978 | A |
4121804 | O'Leary | Oct 1978 | A |
4123031 | Hyre | Oct 1978 | A |
4133433 | Wolf | Jan 1979 | A |
4158452 | Gates | Jun 1979 | A |
4162682 | Miller et al. | Jul 1979 | A |
4163537 | Mourgue | Aug 1979 | A |
4188017 | Dingler | Feb 1980 | A |
4194338 | Trafton | Mar 1980 | A |
4202145 | Coulter et al. | May 1980 | A |
4248024 | Dahlstrom | Feb 1981 | A |
4261144 | Rizzo | Apr 1981 | A |
4342440 | Eyden | Aug 1982 | A |
4348002 | Eyden | Sep 1982 | A |
4349491 | Eyden | Sep 1982 | A |
4371203 | Munro | Feb 1983 | A |
4458461 | Holley | Jul 1984 | A |
4470574 | Jackson | Sep 1984 | A |
4473209 | Gallis | Sep 1984 | A |
4481748 | D'Alessio | Nov 1984 | A |
4493172 | Jones | Jan 1985 | A |
4499967 | Anderson | Feb 1985 | A |
4516372 | Grutsch | May 1985 | A |
4529163 | Dingler | Jul 1985 | A |
4558544 | Albrecht et al. | Dec 1985 | A |
4582001 | Leikarts | Apr 1986 | A |
4587786 | Woods | May 1986 | A |
4619433 | Maier | Oct 1986 | A |
4685264 | Landis | Aug 1987 | A |
4742985 | Mathis | May 1988 | A |
4743202 | Bach | May 1988 | A |
4761847 | Savage et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
4776557 | Turner | Oct 1988 | A |
4787183 | Johnston | Nov 1988 | A |
4805365 | Bastian | Feb 1989 | A |
4805735 | Anderson | Feb 1989 | A |
4813196 | Bokelund et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
4821844 | Huffman et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4826113 | Winters | May 1989 | A |
4831791 | Ball | May 1989 | A |
4880195 | Lepley | Nov 1989 | A |
4881716 | Dingler | Nov 1989 | A |
4919268 | Young et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
5009050 | Gruber | Apr 1991 | A |
5029670 | Whitmer | Jul 1991 | A |
5029803 | Schworer | Jul 1991 | A |
5044601 | Miller | Sep 1991 | A |
5048781 | Breen | Sep 1991 | A |
5078360 | Spera | Jan 1992 | A |
5104079 | Hardtke | Apr 1992 | A |
5125617 | Miller | Jun 1992 | A |
5127342 | Taylor | Jul 1992 | A |
5146816 | Badstieber | Sep 1992 | A |
5150557 | Gregory | Sep 1992 | A |
5154837 | Jones | Oct 1992 | A |
5174909 | Ward | Dec 1992 | A |
5192145 | Rixen et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5219473 | Sandwith | Jun 1993 | A |
5228258 | Onoda et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5240089 | Spera | Aug 1993 | A |
5263296 | Spera | Nov 1993 | A |
5265836 | Dale | Nov 1993 | A |
5292098 | Worthington | Mar 1994 | A |
5307601 | Mccracken | May 1994 | A |
5367852 | Masuda | Nov 1994 | A |
5379566 | Schwörer | Jan 1995 | A |
5385323 | Garelick | Jan 1995 | A |
5447249 | Vickers | Sep 1995 | A |
5509635 | Jaruzel | Apr 1996 | A |
5529144 | Henderson | Jun 1996 | A |
5549176 | Hawkins | Aug 1996 | A |
5560730 | Gillard | Oct 1996 | A |
5570500 | Merkel | Nov 1996 | A |
5575938 | Ono | Nov 1996 | A |
5641036 | Maxwell | Jun 1997 | A |
5655336 | Azar | Aug 1997 | A |
5680732 | Skouras | Oct 1997 | A |
5711397 | Flora | Jan 1998 | A |
5729948 | Levy et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5746535 | Kohler | May 1998 | A |
5791096 | Chen | Aug 1998 | A |
5863020 | Olson | Jan 1999 | A |
5941486 | Riblet | Aug 1999 | A |
5961240 | Bobrovniczky | Oct 1999 | A |
5979119 | Trafton | Nov 1999 | A |
5979138 | Allen | Nov 1999 | A |
6003631 | Knauth | Dec 1999 | A |
6059258 | Jackson | May 2000 | A |
6092623 | Collavino | Jul 2000 | A |
6106186 | Taipale et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6161359 | Ono | Dec 2000 | A |
6173809 | Cole | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6186856 | Chen | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6298629 | Ador | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6318572 | Lai | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6321501 | Ignash | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6363685 | Kugler | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6370741 | Lu | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6422345 | Schwörer | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6439344 | Cole | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6450291 | Ono | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6520471 | Jones et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6520705 | Stasney, Jr. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6554235 | Fortier | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6575652 | Krauss | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6591574 | Humphrey | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6688430 | Wallther | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6712543 | Schmalzhofer | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6722468 | Albano | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6751914 | Zeh et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6752570 | Lanka | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6872117 | Chen | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6874741 | Mirsberger | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6886662 | Riley | May 2005 | B2 |
6913422 | Rogers | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6953106 | Weston et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6962234 | Reeves | Nov 2005 | B1 |
7032268 | Jackson | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7096641 | Birnbaum et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7120664 | Sawa et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7165361 | Vanagan | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7178765 | Huang | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7249624 | Zeh et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7275731 | Shinault | Oct 2007 | B1 |
7404532 | Baril | Jul 2008 | B1 |
7530540 | Long et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7823347 | Blinn | Nov 2010 | B1 |
7913463 | Russell | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7918059 | Repasky | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7950199 | Newhouse et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
8061672 | Kaufman | Nov 2011 | B1 |
8083192 | Wells et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8136633 | Rogers | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8181742 | Ranese | May 2012 | B1 |
8191840 | Jenestreet | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8302356 | Knight, III et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8403280 | Halverson | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8418425 | Santini | Apr 2013 | B1 |
8505864 | Taylor | Aug 2013 | B1 |
8616519 | Bacon | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8635820 | Lafferty, III et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8671635 | Jones | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8684412 | Steins | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8827587 | Didehvar | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8850753 | Tabibnia | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8869477 | Ha et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8898999 | Kugler et al. | Dec 2014 | B1 |
8978176 | Oh | Mar 2015 | B1 |
8978822 | Kreller | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9015950 | Husebo | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9056639 | Bank | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9074379 | Ciuperca | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9153860 | Tserodze et al. | Oct 2015 | B2 |
9179774 | Kessell | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9206632 | Fields | Dec 2015 | B1 |
9232783 | Blackwell | Jan 2016 | B2 |
9249565 | Merrifield | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9388561 | Johnson et al. | Jul 2016 | B2 |
9422711 | Hendry | Aug 2016 | B1 |
9546489 | Rosati | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9556624 | Law | Jan 2017 | B1 |
9587298 | Lin et al. | Mar 2017 | B2 |
9637937 | Wallther | May 2017 | B2 |
9719267 | Rogers | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9951528 | Kugler et al. | Apr 2018 | B2 |
10018208 | Hollis | Jul 2018 | B2 |
10106991 | Dombrowski et al. | Oct 2018 | B2 |
10125505 | So | Nov 2018 | B2 |
10266993 | Szekely | Apr 2019 | B2 |
10415311 | Parker | Sep 2019 | B2 |
10422140 | Mitchell | Sep 2019 | B2 |
10415262 | Chevis | Nov 2019 | B2 |
10465339 | Chevis | Nov 2019 | B2 |
10465399 | Chevis | Nov 2019 | B2 |
10472823 | Chevis | Nov 2019 | B2 |
10570632 | Hartman | Feb 2020 | B1 |
10640968 | Tefenhart, Jr. | May 2020 | B2 |
10641302 | Huffman et al. | May 2020 | B1 |
10797372 | Hemmervall | Oct 2020 | B2 |
10844613 | Repasky et al. | Nov 2020 | B2 |
10995504 | Cook | May 2021 | B1 |
11199011 | Kreller | Dec 2021 | B2 |
11203470 | Ezra et al. | Dec 2021 | B2 |
11530541 | Switzer | Dec 2022 | B1 |
20020003061 | Philippe | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020036118 | Ono | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020084141 | Thomas | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020092961 | Gallis | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020185335 | Verdyk | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030194265 | Krauss | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030213152 | Kim | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040035064 | Kugler et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040055249 | Kennedy | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040118065 | Jackson et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040200172 | Beck et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040231922 | Schwoerer | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040237437 | Hur | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050045785 | Cohen | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050166483 | Mead | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050217040 | Jackson | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060011802 | Di Cesare | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060027729 | McCracken | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060042179 | Vanagan | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060175130 | Riley | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060207215 | Bruno | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060239769 | Schwoerer | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060272889 | Paquette | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070021048 | Henning | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070045048 | Wyse | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070056799 | Leidner | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070074480 | Kleila | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20080017783 | Vanagan | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080105172 | Repasky | May 2008 | A1 |
20080141601 | Mead | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080178641 | Himmen | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080210725 | Birtwisle et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080244006 | Weisner et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080244996 | Gillespie et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090056258 | Currier | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090188189 | Repasky | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090211195 | Schwerer | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090212195 | Arocena Bergareche et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090230283 | Brewka | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090301815 | Rogers | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100000822 | Wall | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100005735 | Gillespie et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100024176 | Ubinana Felix | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100025563 | Seng | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100071141 | Reiner | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100122872 | Korevaar | May 2010 | A1 |
20100218452 | Wolf | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100224447 | Rogers | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20110011018 | Johnson et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110101587 | Quintania | May 2011 | A1 |
20110138723 | Repasky | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20120025058 | Floreani et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120076605 | Crane | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120112376 | Khoo | May 2012 | A1 |
20120117913 | Melic | May 2012 | A1 |
20130015185 | Leal et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130036688 | Gosain | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130043095 | Thacker | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130161462 | Haddock | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130221175 | McGee | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130228394 | Sousa | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130312357 | Lin | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130333191 | Wallther | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140020982 | Hayman et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140021424 | Ramskov | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140086669 | Rogers | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140228060 | Abhyanker | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140250821 | Strickland et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140339019 | Hulett et al. | Nov 2014 | A1 |
20140361144 | Mcgahan | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150033661 | Chase | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150157885 | Liu | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150211242 | Rosati | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150337548 | Ciuperca | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20160002936 | Cox | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160102462 | Griffiths et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160199750 | Yamagishi | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160244984 | Hollmann | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160281376 | Ward | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160305459 | Park | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20170037631 | McManus et al. | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170254099 | Grumberg et al. | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20170260758 | Siltala et al. | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20170292280 | White | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20170321413 | Pridham | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20170350141 | Kugler et al. | Dec 2017 | A1 |
20170370099 | Chevis | Dec 2017 | A1 |
20180099233 | Peiler | Apr 2018 | A1 |
20180112423 | Hartman | Apr 2018 | A1 |
20180119435 | Jablonski | May 2018 | A1 |
20180187428 | Maher | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20190010717 | Baron | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20190127996 | Chevis | May 2019 | A1 |
20190321664 | Hsu | Oct 2019 | A1 |
20200011074 | Chevis | Jan 2020 | A1 |
20210108427 | Bacon | Apr 2021 | A1 |
20210156157 | Ubinana | May 2021 | A1 |
20210180344 | McCracken | Jun 2021 | A1 |
20210246673 | Haeberle | Aug 2021 | A1 |
20220010568 | Mikic et al. | Jan 2022 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1006369 | Aug 1994 | BE |
2712330 | Jul 2011 | CA |
506685 | Apr 1971 | CH |
1188175 | Jul 1998 | CN |
201835529 | May 2011 | CN |
103899083 | Jul 2014 | CN |
203878831 | Oct 2014 | CN |
204386134 | Jun 2015 | CN |
107100358 | Aug 2017 | CN |
207686282 | Aug 2018 | CN |
110700585 | Jan 2020 | CN |
210086830 | Feb 2020 | CN |
9305194 | Aug 1993 | DE |
9309950 | Sep 1993 | DE |
4328105 | Sep 1994 | DE |
19807860 | Sep 1999 | DE |
29912555 | Oct 1999 | DE |
20006912 | Jun 2000 | DE |
10121957 | Nov 2002 | DE |
102008026989 | Mar 2009 | DE |
102008026989 | Sep 2009 | DE |
202009010716 | Nov 2009 | DE |
202010002426 | Jun 2010 | DE |
0062420 | Oct 1982 | EP |
0369108 | May 1990 | EP |
0375969 | Jul 1990 | EP |
0408209 | Jan 1991 | EP |
0729536 | Sep 1996 | EP |
678637 | Jul 1998 | EP |
1498571 | Jan 2005 | EP |
1559851 | Mar 2005 | EP |
1544379 | Jun 2005 | EP |
2141307 | Jan 2010 | EP |
2462296 | Jun 2012 | EP |
2937056 | Oct 2015 | EP |
2982813 | Feb 2016 | EP |
3073028 | Sep 2016 | EP |
2245264 | Dec 2005 | ES |
926917 | Oct 1947 | FR |
1165329 | Oct 1958 | FR |
2527254 | Nov 1983 | FR |
2593843 | Aug 1987 | FR |
838828 | Jun 1960 | GB |
877463 | Sep 1961 | GB |
1465950 | Mar 1977 | GB |
2133826 | Aug 1984 | GB |
2145761 | Apr 1985 | GB |
2215374 | Sep 1989 | GB |
2398848 | Sep 2004 | GB |
2592433 | Sep 2021 | GB |
H 07-279411 | Oct 1995 | JP |
H 10-46806 | Feb 1998 | JP |
2002256700 | Sep 2002 | JP |
2004156416 | Jun 2004 | JP |
2009127315 | Jun 2009 | JP |
2016532026 | Oct 2016 | JP |
920008222 | Nov 1992 | KR |
013460 | Feb 1999 | KR |
20030095163 | Dec 2003 | KR |
200372312 | Jan 2005 | KR |
200381397 | Apr 2005 | KR |
200410996 | Mar 2006 | KR |
20060078341 | Jul 2006 | KR |
10-0682310 | Feb 2007 | KR |
20110077096 | Jul 2011 | KR |
101194682 | Oct 2012 | KR |
20-0463949 | Dec 2012 | KR |
200469990 | Nov 2013 | KR |
101335478 | Dec 2013 | KR |
20170128688 | Nov 2017 | KR |
20190088168 | Jul 2019 | KR |
20190115612 | Oct 2019 | KR |
102166828 | Oct 2020 | KR |
102180857 | Nov 2020 | KR |
20210043807 | Apr 2021 | KR |
WO-9109191 | Jun 1991 | WO |
1998007935 | Feb 1998 | WO |
2002003116 | Aug 2002 | WO |
2006135223 | Dec 2006 | WO |
2007043897 | Apr 2007 | WO |
WO-2010054836 | May 2010 | WO |
2012096639 | Jul 2012 | WO |
2017223504 | Dec 2017 | WO |
WO-2018143534 | Aug 2018 | WO |
Entry |
---|
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion; PCT/US2021/020113; Aug. 2021. |
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion; PCT/US2018/066256; Apr. 11, 2019. |
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion; PCT/US2017/039097; Jun. 23, 2017. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20200080303 A1 | Mar 2020 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62471173 | Mar 2017 | US | |
62354325 | Jun 2016 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15630923 | Jun 2017 | US |
Child | 16680368 | US |