Foundry coke products and associated processing methods via cupolas

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 11946108
  • Patent Number
    11,946,108
  • Date Filed
    Friday, November 4, 2022
    2 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, April 2, 2024
    a year ago
Abstract
Foundry coke products, and associated methods and systems for melting iron in a cupola furnace with the coke products are disclosed herein. A representative method can include receiving a population of coke products and iron in a cupola furnace, and melting the iron in the cupola furnace to form molten iron having a carbon content higher than a carbon content of the received iron. The coke products can comprise (i) an elongate shape including a length:width dimension of at least 1.5:1, (ii) an ash fusion temperature of no more than 2400° F., and/or (iii) a coke reactivity index (CRI) of at least 30%.
Description
TECHNICAL FIELD

This present technology relates to foundry coke products, and associated systems and processing methods via cupolas.


BACKGROUND

Coke can be divided into various subcategories. Foundry coke has a large size relative to blast coke and is of exceptional quality, including relatively low impurities, and relatively high carbon content, strength, and stability. Foundry coke is used in foundry cupolas to melt iron and produce cast iron and ductile iron products. However, the production cost, including the manufacturing cost, transportation cost, and environmental cost, for foundry coke is high. Additionally, conventional coke products can have characteristics that result in undesirable processing conditions within a cupola. For example, conventional coke products may undergo oxidation and/or combustion reactions at areas of the cupola that limit transfer of the carbon content from the coke products to molten iron within cupolas. This decreased efficiency increases the amount of coke products needed to produce iron product and costs for iron producers. Therefore, there is a need to produce a higher quality foundry coke product.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

Features, aspects, and advantages of the presently disclosed technology may be better understood with regard to the following drawings.



FIG. 1 is a partially schematic illustration of a foundry cupola, in accordance with embodiments of the present technology.



FIG. 2 is a plot illustrating the relationship between tap temperature, air volume rate, melting rate, and iron to carbon ratio for a foundry cupola, in accordance with embodiments of the present technology.



FIG. 3 illustrates the coke chemistry of a coke product during oxidation in a cupola, in accordance with embodiments of the present technology.



FIG. 4 depicts an example foundry coke product and a table of foundry coke properties, in accordance with embodiments of the present technology.



FIG. 5 is a chart indicating foundry coke product yield, in accordance with embodiments of the present technology.



FIG. 6 is a chart indicating particle size of foundry coke products, in accordance with embodiments of the present technology.



FIG. 7 is a chart indicating 4-inch drop shatter properties of foundry coke products, in accordance with embodiments of the present technology.



FIG. 8 is a chart indicating 6-inch drop shatter properties of foundry coke products, in accordance with embodiments of the present technology.



FIG. 9 is a chart indicating an ash mass fraction of foundry coke products, in accordance with embodiments of the present technology.



FIG. 10 is a chart indicating a moisture mass fraction of foundry coke products, in accordance with embodiments of the present technology.



FIG. 11 is a chart indicating a sulfur mass fraction of foundry coke products, in accordance with embodiments of the present technology.



FIG. 12 is a chart depicting SiO2 and Al2O3 mass fractions in the ash of foundry coke products, in accordance with embodiments of the present technology.



FIG. 13 is a chart depicting Fe2O3 and CaO mass fractions in the ash of foundry coke products, in accordance with embodiments of the present technology.



FIG. 14 is a chart depicting ash softening temperatures and model ash fusion temperatures of different batches of foundry coke products, in accordance with embodiments of the present technology.



FIG. 15 is a chart depicting ash softening temperatures and ash mass fractions of different batches of foundry coke products, in accordance with embodiments of the present technology.



FIG. 16 is a chart depicting observed ash fusion temperatures and model ash fusion temperatures of different batches of foundry coke products, in accordance with embodiments of the present technology.





A person skilled in the relevant art will understand that the features shown in the drawings are for purposes of illustrations, and variations, including different and/or additional features and arrangements thereof, are possible.


DETAILED DESCRIPTION
I. Overview

Embodiments of the present technology relate to foundry coke products and associated systems and processing methods via foundry cupolas (e.g., iron foundry cupolas, mineral wool foundry cupolas, lead foundry cupolas, etc.). Foundry cupolas are used to melt metal (e.g., iron and/or recycled steel) to produce usable products. Foundry coke is an input to and provides multiple functions within a cupola, including (i) providing heat from combustion thereof to melt the metal, (ii) supplying carbon to the metal, (iii) providing structural support for the metal, and (iv) creating permeable layers that allow gases to travel upward and spread throughout the cupola to provide contact with the metal.


In operation, as metal and coke heat and progress downward through the cupola, the heat of combustion of the coke causes the metal to melt, decrease in viscosity, and eventually form liquid or molten metal that is high or higher is carbon. At an upper portion or drying region of the cupola, heat dries the cupolas and reduces moistures, but preferably does not burn or combust the coke. If the coke is burned or combusted at the drying region of the cupola (i.e., too early), as opposed to deeper in the cupola at a lower portion or reaction region (e.g., comprising melting, combustion and well zones), relatively high amounts of carbon monoxide and/or hydrogen are produced and released, which corresponds to a loss of carbon and/or less carbon that can be transferred to the metal in the reaction region of the cupola. Stated differently, combusting the coke too early in the cupola, or at an area other than the reaction region, can cause carbon from the coke to react with carbon dioxide to form carbon monoxide. This generally results in efficiency losses and higher costs for steel production, including the need to use more coke and more oxygen or wind at the reaction region of the cupola. Additionally, such undesirable reactions at the upper portion of the cupola can result in more smoke production and a lower metal tap temperature, which can limit operational ability of the cupola and also correspond to efficiency losses. Such undesirable reactions can occur due to characteristics of the coke, including the size, shape, density, porosity, composition, and/or chemistry thereof. For example, an ash fusion temperature of the coke, which is a direct result of the chemistry and/or composition of the coke, can dictate where within the cupola the coke begins to cook. Conventional coke products often have an ash fusion temperature that is too high (e.g., above 2650° F.), and thus do not enable optimal processing of coke in the cupola.


Embodiments of the present technology address at least some of the above-described issues, and include a coke product comprising a size, shape, density, porosity, composition, and/or chemistry that enables a more optimal processing thereof via cupolas. For example, embodiments of the present technology include a coke product having an ash fusion temperature (e.g., below 2600° F., 2500° F., 2400° F., 2300° F., 2200° F., 2100° F., 2000° F., 1900° F., 1800° F., or within a range of 1800-2600° F., 1800-2400° F., or 1800-2200° F.) that enables the coke to be heated and combusted in a time-controlled and/or temperature-delayed manner, such that a core of the coke product (i) is heated and does not undergo combustion or oxidation in the drying region of the cupola and/or (ii) undergo combustion or oxidation in the reaction region (e.g., the melting, combustion and well zones) of the cupola. In doing so, the surface area of the coke that is exposed to metal or molten metal is increased, relative to conventional coke products, and more carbon from the coke can be transferred to the molten metal. Stated differently, unlike traditional coke products, which undergo more oxidation or combustion prior to the reaction region of the cupola and thus undesirably produce carbon monoxide, embodiments of the present technology optimize the melting profile of the metal and maximize the amount of carbon transferred from the coke to the metal within the cupola.


As explained herein, as the foundry coke products of embodiments of the present technology is heated, its core decreases in diameter and one or more diffusion layers can build up around (e.g., at least partially surrounding) the core. The diffusion layers can include (i) a first diffusion layer comprising ash (e.g., an ash diffusion layer) that acts as a rate controlling mechanism to delay combustion and/or oxidation of the coke core, e.g., until the coke progresses through the cupola and reaches the reaction region, and (ii) a second diffusion layer radially outward of the first diffusion layer and comprising iron, which can be a further rate controlling mechanism that also delays combustion and/or oxidation of the coke core. As the coke progresses through the cupola, the ash can be displaced from the coke (e.g., as a liquid) and carbon from the ash can be transferred to the metal within the cupola. In this regard, the ash diffusion layer limits cooking of the coke until the coke reaches the reaction region of the cupola, and as a result more carbon transfer can occur within the reaction region, compared to traditional coke products, which in turn forms carbon dioxide and less carbon monoxide. Moreover, because more of the carbon transfer is happening at the reaction region of the cupola and less or no carbon monoxide is produced outside of the reaction region, the cupolas can be operated at higher temperatures that can lead to increased efficiency and greater operational flexibility. Higher operating temperatures of the cupola can enable less smoke production and lower wind and/or oxygen usage, and can reduce coke usage, all of which result in lower cupolas operating costs. Additionally, higher operating temperatures can enable more desirable (e.g., thinner) steel materials to be produced that have higher profitability. Additional benefits of embodiments of the present technology are described elsewhere herein.


In the Figures, identical reference numbers identify generally similar, and/or identical, elements. Many of the details, dimensions, and other features shown in the Figures are merely illustrative of particular embodiments of the disclosed technology. Accordingly, other embodiments can have other details, dimensions, and features without departing from the spirit or scope of the disclosure. In addition, those of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that further embodiments of the various disclosed technologies can be practiced without several of the details described below.


II. Coke Processing Via Foundry Cupolas


FIG. 1 is a partially schematic illustration of a foundry cupola 100, in accordance with embodiments of the present technology. The cupola 100 is a triple bed reactor containing gases, liquids, and solids along a length of the cupola 100. As shown in FIG. 1, the cupola 100 includes a refractory-lined elongate furnace body 102 including an inlet opening at a top of the body 102 configured to receive metal 112 comprising iron and/or steel, as well as coke 130 and fluxing material. The body 102 includes a drying region 106 at an upper portion of the cupola, and a reaction rection 108 downstream of the drying region 106. The reaction region 108 can include a melting zone, a combustion zone downstream of the melting zone, and a well zone downstream of the melting zone. The cupola 100 further comprises a wind box 110 configured to provide a source of oxygen to the body 102 and enable combustion of the coke 130. As the metal 112 and coke 130 proceed through the body 102 of the cupola 100, slag 116 and molten iron 118 form at a lower portion of the cupola 100. The molten iron 118 can be used to produce desirable steel products, and the slag 116 can be used as an aggregate in multiple end use applications.


In operation, the coke 130 supplies carbon to the metal 112 and provides structural support for the metal 112 within the body 102. Additionally, combustion of the coke 130 provides heat that melts that metal 112 and causes it to transition from a solid material to a molten liquid along a length of the body 102. In representative embodiments, the coke 130 is dried at the drying region of the cupola 100 to reduce moisture therefrom, but is not oxidized or combusted. That is, carbon content of the coke remains in the coke at this stage and does not react to form carbon monoxide. If carbon monoxide is formed at the drying region or this high up in the body 102, the carbon of the formed carbon monoxide is released from the upper portion of the cupola 101 and is not able to be transferred to the metal 112 at the downstream reaction region 108 of the cupola 100. Additionally, combusting and/or oxidizing the coke and/or production of carbon monoxide at the drying region generally results in efficiency losses and higher operating costs for the cupola 100.


The coke 130 of the present technology is inhibited or prevented from being oxidized and combusted in the drying region 106 due to, e.g., the size, shape, density, porosity, composition, and/or chemistry of the coke. As the coke 130 is heated within the body 102, moisture decreases in the drying region 106, and the coke 130 undergoes oxidation and combustion in the reaction region 108. As a result of such oxidation and/or combustion, a core of individual coke particles 130 radially decreases in size and one or more diffusion layers forms around the core, as explained herein with reference to FIG. 2. The one or more diffusion layers act as a rate-limiting mechanism to inhibit oxidation and combustion within the drying region 106, and promote oxidation and combustion within the reaction region 108.


The size, shape, porosity, density, and other characteristics of the coke 130 can also contribute to the optimal melting, oxidizing, and/or combusting profile desired for the cupola 100. For example, the coke 130 can be about 4×6″ length (i.e., 4″+) or 3.5×6″ which desirably enables a lower pressure drop in the cupola 100, relative to smaller coke products. In some embodiments, the coke 130 can comprise foundry coke greater than 4″, egg coke greater than 2×4″, stove coke greater than 1×2″, and breeze less than 1″. Including a combination of foundry coke greater than 4″ as well as egg coke of or greater than 2×4″ can decrease costs of the coke blend because 2×4″ coke is less expensive. Additionally or alternatively, a combination of foundry coke greater than 4″ as well as egg coke of or greater than 2×4″ can provide an optimal coke blend to improve pressure drop and/or carbon transfer from coke to metal. In some embodiments, egg coke can comprise less than 20% of the coke blend or between 10-20% of the coke blend. Additionally or alternatively, in some embodiments less than 10%, less than 8%, or less than 6% of the coke 130 in the cupola 100 is less than 2″.


As another example, the coke 130 can have an elongate or oblong shape, which, relative to the traditional more round, less elongate shapes of other coke products, enables a higher surface area to volume ratio and thereby improves contact and thus carbon transfer between the coke 130 and the metal 112. As another example, the coke 130 can have a porosity (e.g., between 20-50%, 30-50%, or 40-50%), which desirably enables the gas to permeate through the coke 130 and spread heat within the cupola 100, while also providing sufficient structural support for the metal 112. As another example, the coke 130 can have a higher density, relative to conventional coke products, and thus have a higher carbon content and better calorific value that enables less coke usage within the cupola 100.


As the coke 130 and metal 112 progress through the cupola 100, the metal 112 and ash of the coke 130 each begins to melt and decrease in viscosity along a length of the cupola 100. The melted ash can beneficially more quickly move through the coke bed 114 and/or body 102 generally, and thus increase contact time with the metal 112 to improve carbon transfer. Within the reaction region 108, carbon is transferred from the coke 130 to the metal 112. In some embodiments, at least 10%, 20%, 30%, 35%, 40%, 45%, 50%, or 55% of the carbon from the coke is transferred to the metal (e.g., the molten metal) within the cupola 100. Additionally, oxygen from air provided via the wind box 110 of the cupola 100 reacts with carbon of the coke 130 causing combustion and carbon dioxide production, as well as heat and gases used to heat upper portions of the cupola 100, e.g., to reduce moisture of the coke 130 with the drying region 106. By maximizing the production of carbon dioxide at the reaction region 108, or at areas deeper in the cupola 100, less carbon monoxide and more carbon dioxide is produced which leads to higher metal tap temperatures at the tap 120 of the cupola 100. A higher tap temperature can improve carbon conversion which lower coke usage, and enables lower wind and/or less oxygen injection. For embodiments of the present technology, for example, the iron to coke (or carbon) ratios can be at least 11:1, 12:1, 13:1, 14:1, 15:1, 16:1, or 17:1, whereas for traditional coke products the iron to coke (or carbon ratios) are no higher than 11:1 and more typically less than 10:1. As such, due to efficiency gains, embodiments of the present technology enable less coke usage and thus decreased operating costs.


The coke 130 has a fixed carbon content that is transferred to the iron/metal, or released from the top of the cupola 100 via gaseous carbon monoxide or carbon dioxide. For reasons described herein, the coke 130 of the present technology promotes transfer of the fixed carbon content to the iron/metal, as a result also limit the amount of carbon monoxide produced and released from the cupola. For example, the coke 130 of the present technology can limit the amount of carbon monoxide released from the cupola 100 to be less than 60 lbs/hr, 55 lbs/hr, 50 lbs/hr, 45 lbs/hr, 40 lbs/hr, 35 lbs/hr, 30 lbs/hr, or 25 lbs/hr. Relatedly, for embodiments of the present technology, the amount of fixed carbon content of the coke 130 that is released from the cupola 100 via carbon monoxide can be no more than 60%, 50%, 45%, 40%, 35%, or 30%. Additionally or alternatively, embodiments of the present technology can include a ratio for the amount of the fixed carbon content released as carbon monoxide relative to the amount of carbon released as carbon dioxide can be no more than 2.2:1, 2.1:1, 2.0:1, 1.95:1, or 1.9:1.


The cupola 100 can further include a thermal oxidizer 124, which can include a thermocouple to monitor temperature and/or be configured to oxidize hazardous air pollutants (HAPs) and/or volatile organic compounds (VOCs). In practice, the thermal oxidizer 124 can operate based on maintaining a minimum temperature (e.g., 1700° F., 1750° F., 1800° F., 1850° F., 1900° F., 1950° F., or 2000° F.) at the inlet of the body 102 where gases (e.g., carbon monoxide and hydrogen) are released from the cupola 100. If, for example, too much carbon monoxide is undesirably produced, particularly within the drying region 106, the temperature at the inlet or elsewhere of the body 102 can decrease and cause the thermal oxidizer 124 to fire and thereby oxidize the HAPs or VOCs and form, e.g., carbon dioxide and water.



FIG. 2 is a plot 200 illustrating the relationship between tap temperature, air volume (i.e., wind) rate, melting rate, and iron to carbon ratio for a foundry cupola, in accordance with embodiments of the present technology. A higher tap temperature, higher iron to carbon ratio, and lower wind are generally desired for a given melting rate, as these parameters each correspond to efficiency gains and/or decreased operating costs for cupola operators. Embodiments of the present technology enable a relatively higher tap temperature compared to convention coke products, and thus provide a larger operational window and flexibility for cupola operators to adjust other factors (e.g., tap temperature and wind rate) while maintaining a desired melting rate. Referring to FIG. 2, point 210 corresponds to a base operation that may be enabled by coke products of the present technology. Point 210 corresponds to an iron to carbon ratio of about 9.5, a tap temperature of about 2740° F., a melting rate of 24 tons/hr, and an air volume rate of about 9.3 ft3/min. Points 215, 220, 225, and 230 illustrate optional operational changes that may be enabled based on tap temperature and/or the quality of coke used. For example, relative to point 210, point 215 corresponds to the same tap temperature of 2740° F. but uses less wind (approximately 8.8 ft3/min). As a result of the lower wind, the melting rate is decreased about 10% to 22 tons/hr and about 3% more coke is needed. Point 220 corresponds to a lower tap temperature (approximately 2720° F.) and less wind (approximately 8.4 ft3/min), which results in a melting rate decrease of about 10% to 22 tons/hr and needing about 3% less coke. Point 225 corresponds to a lower tap temperature (approximately 2690° F.) and less wind (approximately 8.0 ft3/min), which results in the same melting rate as point 210 and needing about 17% less coke. Point 230 corresponds to a lower tap temperature and the same wind as point 210, which results in an increased melting rate needing about 10% less coke. The plot 200 and points 210, 215, 220, 225, 230 illustrate the benefits that coke products of embodiments of the present technology provide.


III. Foundry Coke Composition and Characteristics


FIG. 3 illustrates a coke particle 300 configured to be heated in a foundry cupola (e.g., the cupola 100; FIG. 1), in accordance with embodiments of the present technology. As shown in FIG. 3, C(b)=carbon bulk, S(b)=sulfur bulk, Ash (b)=ash in bulk, C(s)=surface carbon, S(s)=surface sulfur, Ash(s)=surface ash (which builds up from the shrinking core), Fe(s)=surface Fe, C*(s)=active carbon surface, FeC, S*(s)=active sulfur surface, FeS, C(l)=carbon in liquid, and S(l)=sulfur in liquid. The coke particle 300 includes a core 305 that shrinks due to carbon dissolution in a cupola, where the coke particle 300 can be surrounded by a bulk liquid 320. As the core 305 of the coke particle 300 shrinks, e.g., due to oxidation and/or combustion of the carbon of the coke particle 300, diffusion layers comprising ash and iron that are radially outward of the core 305 begin to form. For example, the coke particle 300 can include a first or ash diffusion layer 310 (“first diffusion layer 310”) comprising ash that is radially outward of the core 305 and at least partially surrounds the core 305, and a second or iron diffusion layer 315 (“second diffusion layer 315”) that is radially outward of the core 305 and first diffusion layer 310 and at least partially surrounds the first diffusion layer 310.


The first diffusion layer 310 layer can be solid or liquid, and can effectively block the coke surface, or lower the mass transfer area across the coke surface into the surrounding liquid metal. Additionally or alternatively, the first diffusion layer 310 enables oxidation and/or combustion of the carbon of the coke particle to be time and/or temperature delayed, such that the coke does not produce carbon monoxide in the drying region and instead is oxidized and combusted in the reaction region of the cupola. The first diffusion layer 310 comprising ash is formed in part due to the ash fusion temperature of the coke product, which is directly correlated to the composition of the coke particle 300. As described elsewhere herein, the ash fusion temperature of the coke is lower than traditional coke products, and can no more than 2650° F., 2600° F., 2550° F., 2500° F., 2450° F., 2400° F., 2350° F., 2300° F., 2250° F., 2200° F., 2150° F., 2100° F., 2050° F., 2000° F., 1950° F., 1900° F., 1850° F., or within a range of 1800-2600° F., 1800-2500° F., 1900-1300° F., or 2000-2200° F. This relatively low ash fusion temperature can enable formation of the diffusion ash layer, e.g., in the drying region of the cupola, that prevents cooking of the coke, or more particularly the core 305, prior to the reaction region. Additionally or alternatively, this relatively low ash fusion temperature can optimize contact time between the coke 300 and the metal within the cupola once the metal melts and becomes molten at the reaction region of the cupola. As a result, more carbon can be transferred from the coke 300 to the metal. This is in contrast to conventional coke products, which can have a higher ash fusion temperature that results in ash being formed deeper (i.e., downstream) of the reaction region and thus limits the contact time between the coke and the molten metal, thereby resulting in relatively less carbon transfer.


The second diffusion layer 315 is formed as the coke particle 300 is heated within the cupola and the coke core 305 shrinks. The second diffusion layer can further limit cooking of the coke within the drying region and/or help ensure the vast majority of combustion and oxidation of the coke does not occur until the coke 300 reaches the reaction region. Additionally or alternatively, carbon and sulfur may compete with one another to pass through the second diffusion layer 315. That is, the presence of sulfur can undesirably decrease the transfer rate of carbon from and out of the coke 300. In some embodiments, the coke can be pre-fluxed and/or include (e.g., doped with) an additive (e.g., calcium, iron, calcium oxide, magnesium oxide, iron oxide, sodium oxide, and potassium oxide, and/or other oxides having a relatively low melting point) that acts as a catalytic material. As an example, sodium can act as a pre-fluxing agent, and iron can act as a pre-fluxing and catalytic agent. The catalytic material can trap sulfur and therein be utilized to flux the sulfur out of the coke. In some embodiments, the pre-fluxed coke is a result of selecting coals to produce the coke that have ash materials proportionally higher in the oxides described above. This is in contrast to coke products that may add calcium oxide or calcium carbonate particles/rocks as a flux to remove ash, as such methods are inefficient due to the very low surface to volume ratio for the fluxing to actually occur. Additionally, the pre-fluxed coke and/or catalytic agents can promote the carbon deposition via the Boudouard reaction, thereby generating more heat and increasing the amount of carbon that is present within the reaction region (e.g., the combustion zone) of the cupola. Without being bound by theory, the pre-fluxing agents can alter the liquid is temperature of the slag (e.g., slag 116; FIG. 1) or, more particularly, can alter the liquid is temperature of the ash at the surface or interior of the coke that is blended into the bulk slag.


Improved coke chemistry aims at increasing carbon dissolution from the coke particle 300 into the metal (i.e., the iron or steel) within the cupola. In operation, as carbon dissolves into the bulk liquid iron within the cupola, the coke core 305 shrinks and the ash and impurities are built up at the surface. Additionally, carbon and sulfur both dissociate from the surface, which can be aided by catalytic activity of Fe, Ni and other metals. A lower ash melting temperature, represented by an ash fusion temperature (as described elsewhere herein), allows improved ash removal by faster conversion of ash into a liquid phase and reduces ash resistance. Carbon and sulfur diffuse through the thin iron diffusion layer. Additionally, carbon and sulfur are competitive and resistant to dissolving or transferring of each other. As such, a low sulfur content of the coke improves carbon transfer. In addition, coke products having a high coke reactivity index (CRI) or a low coke strength after reaction (CSR) (as described elsewhere herein) allows more reactive carbon forms to dissociate from the surface thereby increasing the carbon dissolution rate.


Various metals added to a foundry coke product produced from a coal blend via ash in the coal blend or otherwise introduced into the foundry coke product can provide catalytic functions that increases a carbon dissolution rate. In some embodiments, a multi-oxidation state element (e.g., a metal) may change oxidation states in a coke product to provide catalytic activity. For example, a coke product may include sodium, which may transition from an unoxidized state Na into a first ionic oxidation state Na+. Alternatively, or additionally, a coke product may include iron, which may transition from an unoxidized state Fe into the oxidized states Fe2+ or Fe3+. Furthermore, the coke product may include the multi-oxidation state elements in an oxidized form. For example, the coke product may include Na+ in the form of a salt or Fe3+ in the form of Fe2O3. The coke product may also include other types of metals, such as nickel, copper, etc. The catalytic material embedded in the coke product increases carbon dissolution during steel production because at least some of the catalytic material will remain in contact with the interface between the coke product and a liquid iron bath during steel production.



FIG. 4 depicts a foundry coke product 400 and a table 450 of foundry coke properties, in accordance with embodiments of the present technology. The foundry coke product 400 can be produced using a coke oven (e.g., a heat recovery oven or non-heat recovery oven). In some embodiments, the foundry coke product 400 can be generally oblong shaped and can have different or similar dimensions along a first length 412, a second length 414, and/or a third length 416. For example, the first length 412 can be greater than 6.0 inches (e.g., 9.0 inches) or within a range of 6.0-12.0 inches, the second length can be greater than 2.5 inches (e.g. 4.0 inches), and the third length can be greater than 2.5 inches (e.g., 4.0 inches). In some embodiments, one or more lengths of the shape of the foundry coke product 400 can be limited to a maximum value. For example, the first length 412 can be between 6.0 inches and 12.0 inches.


Due to variations in the specific shape of foundry coke products, a foundry coke product can be characterized by a range of hydraulic diameters. For example, the foundry coke product 400 can have a hydraulic diameter that is greater than or equal to 1.0 inches, greater than or equal to 2.0 inches, or greater than or equal to 3.0 inches, etc. In some embodiments, the hydraulic diameter of a foundry coke product can be greater than an actual diameter of the foundry coke product due to the cross-sectional geometry of the foundry coke product.


The table 450 includes a set of attributes of the foundry coke product 400. Such attributes can be advantageous for foundry operations, such as having lower ash fusion temperature values in comparison to conventional coke products. Ash fusion temperature can be obtained in various ways. In some embodiments, ash fusion temperature can be measured from a sample of ash created by burning a coal, coal blend, or coke product to completion. The ash elemental analysis can be performed on each element, for example, individual silicon atoms create a signal in the analytical instrument. To obtain a mass percentage value used for model ash fusion calculation, some embodiments of the present technology can treat all elements as fully oxidized and determine a mass percentage is based oxidized forms. For example, some embodiments of the present technology can determine the SiO2 mass but not the Si mass. In some embodiments, the mass percentages of SiO2, Al2O3, Fe2O3, CaO, other compounds, etc., can be normalized to sum up to 100%.


Alternatively or additionally, ash fusion temperature can be measured by an ash fusion temperature test, such as a standard American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) method D1857. For example, some embodiments of the present technology can determine an initial deformation temperature (IDT), softening temperature (ST), hemispherical temperature (HT), and flow temperature (FT). These measured temperatures can have different values with respect to each other, and can be used to characterize a particular coal, coal blend, or coke product. Furthermore, as discussed elsewhere, the composition of the ash remaining from combustion of a coal or coal blend is considered to be the same as the ash remaining after combustion of a coke product produced from the coal or coal blend. Some embodiments can characterize a coal blend ash composition as the weighted average of the ash compositions of the coal components weighted by their respective mass fractions in the coal blend.


The ash fusion temperature can be calculated based on the ash composition using Formula (IA) (Cupola Handbook, 6th ed., © 1999, American Foundrymen's Society, Inc., Chapter 8), below:

AFT(° C.)=19×(wt % of Al2O3)+15×(wt % of SiO2+wt % of TiO2)+10×(wt % of CaO+wt % of MgO)+6×(wt % of Fe2O3+wt % of Na2O)   (Formula IA)

Because K2O is known to be in ash samples and given the similarity of Na and K the K2O is may have a similar impact on the ash fusion temperature as Na2O. Formula (IA) may be modified to include the amount of K2O in the calculation as shown in Formula (IB) below:

AFT(° C.)=19×(wt % of Al2O3)+15×(wt % of SiO2+wt % of TiO2)+10×(wt % of CaO+wt % of MgO)+6×(wt % of Fe2O3+wt % of Na2O+wt % of K2O)  (Formula IB)


For embodiments of the present technology, ash fusion temperature values can be represented in various forms, such as the initial deformation temperature (IDT) or softening temperature (ST) values. For example, sample “S4” shown in the table 450 has an ash fusion IDT equal to 2150° F. (1177° C.). Some embodiments can perform operations to reduce a low ash fusion to a coke product based on an ash fusion temperature threshold or target ash fusion range.


In some embodiments, a target ash fusion temperature value or ash fusion temperature range can vary based on the type of ash fusion value being used. In some embodiments, a produced coke product can have an IDT that is between 2100-2400° F. Some embodiments can include stricter limits on coke products and can include a coke product having an IDT that is between 2100-2250° F. Some embodiments can change coal blends or manufacturing thereof to satisfy a target IDT. For example, some embodiments of the present technology can select a coal blend or determine oven operations based on a target IDT value of approximately 2100° F., 2150° F., 2200° F., 2250° F., 2300° F., 2350° F., or 2400° F. In some embodiments, coke products are produced that have an ST within a specified range, such as between 2150-2500° F., or approximately 2100° F., 2150° F., 2200° F., 2250° F., 2300° F., 2350° F., 2400° F., 2450° F., or 2500° F. Furthermore, some embodiments of the present technology can set a target IDT value as a function of a target ST value.


Similarly, embodiments of the present technology can produce coke products having an HT between 2200-2350° F., 2150-2300° F. Furthermore, some embodiments of the present technology can change coal blends, soak times, or durations at different damper positions to satisfy a target HT. For example, some embodiments of the present technology can select a coal blend or determine oven operations based on a target HT value of approximately 2200° F., 2250° F., 2300° F., 2350° F., 2400° F., 2450° F., or 2500° F. Similarly, embodiments of the present technology can produce coke products having an FT between 2250-2600° F. or 2250-2400° F., or approximately 2250° F., 2300° F., 2350° F., 2400° F., 2450° F., 2500° F., 2550° F., or 2600° F.


Embodiments of the present technology can also produce coke products that satisfy multiple target ranges for different types of ash fusion temperature values. For example, coke products can have an IDT between 2100-2250° F., an ST between 2150-2300° F., an HT between 2200-2350° F., and/or an FT between 2250-2400° F. Additionally or alternatively, various other combination of target ranges for a coke product are possible. For example, embodiments of the present technology can include coke product having an IDT between 2100-2250° F., an ST between 2150-2300° F., an HT between 2200-2350° F., and an FT between 2250-2400° F.


As shown in the table 450, the CRI value of the foundry coke products can be 36.5% or another value that is greater than 35%. Some embodiments can implement coke production operations that produce batches of foundry coke that satisfy one or more CRI thresholds. For example, embodiments of the present technology can include coke products having a CRI of at least 25.0%, 30.0%, 35.0%, 40.0%, or 45.0%. Some embodiments can perform operations to select coke products that have CRI greater than a minimum CRI threshold for downstream use.


As shown in the table 450, the CSR value of the foundry coke products can be 26%, 15.6%, or another value that is greater than a CSR threshold such as 7.0%. Some embodiments can implement coke production operations that produce batches of foundry coke that satisfy one or more CSR thresholds. For example, embodiments of the present technology can include coke products having a CSR of no more than 40.0%, 35.0%, 30.0%, 25.0%, 20.0%, 15.0%, 10.0%, or 7.0%.


As shown in the table 450, an SiO2 composition of the coke product ash can include 49.4%, 48.9%, 48.8%, 49.1%, or 46.0%. Other embodiments can include other SiO2 mass fractions in ash, such as other values less than 70%, 50.0%, or 45.0%. In some embodiments, a mass fraction of approximately 50.0% SiO2 in coke product ash can correspond to a low amount of SiO2 in the coke product itself.


Embodiments of the present technology can include coke products having a fixed carbon content (e.g., a fixed carbon mass fraction) that is greater than or equal to a fixed carbon threshold. For example, embodiments of the present technology include coke products having a fixed carbon mass fraction that is greater than 80.0%, 85.0%, 90.0%, 90.5%, or 91.0%. In some embodiments, the fixed carbon content can be a targeted range, such as 80-91%, 85-95%, or 90-95%.


Embodiments of the present technology can generate coke products having an ash mass fraction within a targeted bounded or unbounded range. For example, embodiments of the present technology can produce foundry coke products having an ash mass fraction of at least 1.0%, 5.0%, 8.0%, 9.0%, or 10.0%. Furthermore, some embodiments of the present technology can include an upper bound to an ash mass fraction. For example, some embodiments of the present technology can produce foundry coke products having an ash mass fraction that is less than 5.0%, 9.0%, or 10.0%.



FIG. 5 is a chart 500 indicating foundry coke product yield in accordance with embodiments of the present technology. As shown in the chart 500, the foundry yield for different batches of coke products produced can vary. As shown by the range 502, the yield can range between approximately 40% and 60%, where this yield can be a dry yield (i.e., the dry mass fraction of foundry coke product can be 40% or 60% of the dry mass fraction of the total population of coke products). More specifically, yields can vary from approximately 57%, as illustrated by data point 553, to 41%, as illustrated by data point 551. In many cases, embodiments of the present technology can implement operations that satisfy a minimum yield threshold, such as operations that result in a yield that is at least 25%, at least 30%, at least 40%, at least 50%, or at least 55%. While some embodiments of the present technology can implement controller optimization operations to increase a yield, some embodiments of the present technology can permit a predicted yield to be less than an expected maximum yield in order to satisfy other target coke product parameters.



FIG. 6 is a chart 600 indicating particle size, in accordance with embodiments of the present technology. As shown in the chart 600, the mean batch lengths in inches for different batches of coke products produced from a coal blend using operations described in this disclosure can vary. As shown by range 602, the coke product mean length can range between approximately 5.5 inches, as illustrated by point 651, to approximately 7.5 inches, as illustrated by point 653.



FIG. 7 is a chart 700 indicating 4-inch drop shatter properties, in accordance with embodiments of the present technology. As shown in the chart 700, the 4-inch drop shatter survival rates for different batches of coke products can range between approximately 80%, as illustrated by point 751, to approximately 95%, as illustrated by point 653. In many cases, embodiments of the present technology can implement operations that satisfy a minimum 4-inch drop shatter survival rate threshold, such as operations that result in a 4-inch drop shatter survival rate of at least 80%, 85%, 90%, or 95%. In many cases, a greater drop shatter survival rate is useful for downstream foundry operations because more coke products survive transportation and downstream processing.



FIG. 8 is a chart 800 indicating 6-inch drop shatter properties, in accordance with embodiments of the present technology. As shown in the chart 800, the 6-inch drop shatter survival rates for different batches of coke products can range between approximately 30%, as illustrated by point 851, to approximately 80%, as illustrated by point 853. Embodiments of the present technology can implement operations that satisfy a minimum 6-inch drop shatter survival rate threshold, such as at least 60%, 70%, or 80%.



FIG. 9 is a chart 900 indicating an ash mass fraction, in accordance with embodiments of the present technology. As shown in the chart 900, the ash mass fractions for different batches of coke products can range between approximately 7%, as illustrated by point 951, to approximately 10%, as illustrated by point 953. In some embodiments, an ash content of a coke product can be less than an ash mass fraction threshold of 10.0%, 9.0%, 8.5%, 8.0%, or 7.5%. Additionally or alternatively, some embodiments of the present technology can produce a coke product having an ash mass fraction threshold that satisfies an ash mass fraction threshold that is less than 10.0%, 9.0%, 8.5%, 8.0%, 7.5%, or 7.0%. Some embodiments can include ash within a range, such as between 6-12%, 7-11%, 7-10%, or 8-10%.



FIG. 10 is a chart 1000 indicating a moisture mass fraction, in accordance with embodiments of the present technology. As shown in the chart 1000, the coke product moisture mass fractions for different batches of coke products can range between approximately 0%, as illustrated by point 1051, to approximately 15%, as illustrated by point 1053. In some embodiments, the moisture mass fraction can be no more than 5.0%, 4.0%, 3.0%, 2.0%, 1.0%, or 0.1%.



FIG. 11 is a chart 1100 indicating a sulfur mass fraction, in accordance with embodiments of the present technology. As shown in the chart 1100, the sulfur mass fractions for different batches of coke products can range between approximately 0.60%, as illustrated by point 1151, to approximately 0.75%, as illustrated by point 1153. In some embodiments, the sulfur mass fraction can be less than 0.8%, 0.7%, 0.65%, 0.5%, or 0.4%.



FIG. 12 is a chart 1200 depicting SiO2 mass fractions and Al2O3 mass fractions in the ash of foundry coke products, in accordance with embodiments of the present technology. In some embodiments, a coke product can be characterized based on their mass fractions of SiO2 and Al2O3 or ratios of these mass fractions. As shown in the chart 1200, different samples of coke ash can indicate different mass fractions or mass fraction ratios of SiO2 and Al2O3. For example, point 1250 indicates a sample having an SiO2 mass fraction of approximately 48.0% and an Al2O3 mass fraction of approximately 24.3%, which suggests that some ash of coke products can have a ratio of approximately 2:1 for a mass fraction ratio of SiO2 to Al2O3. As indicated by the range 1201, the SiO2 mass fractions of different samples can range between 48.0% and 51.0%. Furthermore, as indicated by the range 1202, the Al2O3 mass fractions of different samples can range between approximately 24.3% and 28.4% in some embodiments. In some embodiments, the coke products have a low amount of Al2O3 and SiO2, such that the ash of the coke products have a combined Al2O3 mass fraction and SiO2 mass fraction no more than 65%. By reducing the amount of Al and Si in a coke product, embodiments of the present technology can increase the efficiency of foundry operations by reducing their interference with carbon dissolution during foundry operations.


Some embodiments can produce a coke product or a coal blend used to produce the coal blend that satisfy other thresholds for Al2O3 or SiO2. For example, some embodiments of the present technology can produce a coke product such that an Al2O3 mass fraction of the ash of the coke product, or an ash of a coal blend used to create the coke product, is less than or approximately 30%, 25%, or 20%. Additionally or alternatively, embodiments of the present technology can produce a coke product wherein an SiO2 mass fraction of the ash of the coke product is no more than approximately 50%, 45%, 40%, or 35%. Additionally or alternatively, embodiments of the present technology can produce a coke product wherein a sum of a SiO2 mass fraction and Al2O3 mass fraction of an ash of the coke product is no more than approximately 80%, 75%, 70%, or 65%.



FIG. 13 is a chart 1300 depicting Fe2O3 mass fractions and CaO mass fractions in the ash of foundry coke products, in accordance with embodiments of the present technology. In some embodiments, a coke product can be characterized based on their mass fractions of Fe2O3 and CaO or ratios of these mass fractions. As shown in the chart 1300, different data points representing coke ash samples can indicate different mass fractions and mass fraction ratios of Fe2O3 and CaO. For example, the point 1351 indicates a sample having an Fe2O3 mass fraction of approximately 12.1% and an CaO mass fraction of approximately 2.4%. Furthermore, the point 1352 indicates a sample having an Fe2O3 mass fraction of approximately 15.0% and an CaO mass fraction of approximately 2.8%. Furthermore, the point 1352 indicates a sample having an Fe2O3 mass fraction of approximately 12.0% and an CaO mass fraction of approximately 4.5%. Collectively, the points 1351 indicate that the mass fraction ratios of Fe2O3 and CaO for some samples can range between being approximately 5:1 to approximately 5:2 in some embodiments. Furthermore, as indicated by the range 1301, the Fe2O3 mass fractions of different samples can range between 11.0% and 15.0% in some embodiments. Furthermore, as indicated by the range 1302, the Fe2O3 mass fractions of CaO can range between 2.5% and 4.5% in some embodiments. In some embodiments, coke products have a CaO mass fraction of at least 10.0%, 9.0%, 8.0%, 7.0%, 6.0%, 5.0%, 4.0%, 3.0%, 2.0%, or 1.0%.



FIG. 14 is a chart 1400 depicting Ash Softening Temperatures and Model Ash Fusion Temperatures of different batches of foundry coke products, in accordance with embodiments of the present technology. In some embodiments, a coke product can be characterized based on their ash ST values, model ash fusion temperature values, or ratios of these two values. As shown in the chart 1400, different samples of coke ash can have different ST and model ash fusion temperature values. For example, the point 1451 indicates a sample having an ash ST value equal to approximately 2300° F. and a model ash fusion temperature value equal to approximately 2460° F. Furthermore, the point 1452 indicates a sample having an ash ST value equal to approximately 2550° F. and a model ash fusion temperature value equal to approximately 2580° F. Furthermore, as indicated by a range 1401, the ash ST value of different samples can range between 2300° F. and 2600° F. in some embodiments. Furthermore, as indicated by a range 1402, the model ash fusion temperature values of some samples can range between 2450° F. and 2600° F. in some embodiments.



FIG. 15 is a chart 1500 depicting Ash Softening Temperatures and Ash Mass Fractions of different batches of foundry coke products, in accordance with embodiments of the present technology. In some embodiments, coke products can be characterized based on their ash mass fractions or observed ash ST values. As shown in the chart 1500, different samples of coke ash can indicate different ash mass fractions and observed STs for the different ash samples. For example, the point 1551 indicates a sample having an ST value equal to approximately 2350° F. and an ash mass fraction of approximately 7.8%. Furthermore, the point 1552 indicates a sample having an ST value equal to approximately 2560° F. and an ash mass fraction of approximately 8.1%. Furthermore, the point 2153 indicates a sample having an ST value equal to approximately 2500° F. and an ash mass fraction of approximately 8.8%. Some embodiments can produce coke products having lower ash content and lower ash fusion temperature than coke products using conventional coal blends or conventional operations. By reducing the ash of a coke product available to build up at a coke surface, some embodiments of the present technology can thus improve a carbon dissolution rate during a foundry operation. Similarly, by reducing an ash fusion temperature of a coke product, some embodiments of the present technology can improve an ash dissolution rate by reducing the temperature required to ash from a coke surface during a foundry operation.


In some embodiments, as indicated by the range 1501, the ash content values of different samples can range between 2300° F. and 2560° F. Furthermore, as indicated by the range 1502, the ash content can range between approximately 7.8% to 8.8%. As shown in the chart 1500, some embodiments of the present technology can produce a coke product having an ash mass fraction that is less than 10.0%, less than 9.0%, or less than another maximum ash mass fraction threshold. Furthermore, some embodiments of the present technology can perform operations to maintain a minimum amount of ash product. For example, some embodiments of the present technology can implement coke oven operations to produce coke products having at least 1.0% ash, 5.0% ash, 7.0% ash, etc.



FIG. 16 is a chart 1600 depicting Observed Ash Fusion Temperatures vs. Model Ash Fusion Temperatures of different batches of foundry coke products, in accordance with one or more embodiments of the present technology. The chart 1600 includes a first range 1601, which indicates the range of observed ash fusion temperature values that range from approximately 1990-2800° F. The chart 1600 includes a second range, which indicates the range of model ash fusion temperature values that range between 1900-2750° F. As shown by the chart 1600, coke products can show an approximate direct correlation between model ash fusion temperature values and observed ash fusion temperature values.


IV. Conclusion

It will be apparent to those having skill in the art that changes may be made to the details of the above-described embodiments without departing from the underlying principles of the present technology. In some cases, well known structures and functions have not been shown or described in detail to avoid unnecessarily obscuring the description of the embodiments of the present technology. Although steps of methods may be presented herein in a particular order, alternative embodiments may perform the steps in a different order. Similarly, certain aspects of the present technology disclosed in the context of particular embodiments can be combined or eliminated in other embodiments. Furthermore, while advantages associated with certain embodiments of the present technology may have been disclosed in the context of those embodiments, other embodiments can also exhibit such advantages, and not all embodiments need necessarily exhibit such advantages or other advantages disclosed herein to fall within the scope of the technology. Accordingly, the disclosure and associated technology can encompass other embodiments not expressly shown or described herein, and the invention is not limited except as by the appended claims.


Throughout this disclosure, the singular terms “a,” “an,” and “the” include plural referents unless the context clearly indicates otherwise. The term “comprising,” “including,” and “having” should be interpreted to mean including at least the recited feature(s) such that any greater number of the same feature and/or additional types of other features are not precluded.


Reference herein to “one embodiment,” “an embodiment,” “some embodiments” or similar formulations means that a particular feature, structure, operation, or characteristic described in connection with the embodiment can be included in at least one embodiment of the present technology. Thus, the appearances of such phrases or formulations herein are not necessarily all referring to the same embodiment. Furthermore, various particular features, structures, operations, or characteristics may be combined in any suitable manner in one or more embodiments.


Unless otherwise indicated, all numbers expressing concentrations and other numerical values used in the specification and claims, are to be understood as being modified in all instances by the term “about.” Accordingly, unless indicated to the contrary, the numerical parameters set forth in the following specification and attached claims are approximations that may vary depending upon the desired properties sought to be obtained by the present technology. At the very least, and not as an attempt to limit the application of the doctrine of equivalents to the scope of the claims, each numerical parameter should at least be construed in light of the number of reported significant digits and by applying ordinary rounding techniques. Additionally, all ranges disclosed herein are to be understood to encompass any and all subranges subsumed therein. For example, a range of “1 to 10” includes any and all subranges between (and including) the minimum value of 1 and the maximum value of 10, i.e., any and all subranges having a minimum value of equal to or greater than 1 and a maximum value of equal to or less than 10, e.g., 5.5 to 10.


The disclosure set forth above is not to be interpreted as reflecting an intention that any claim requires more features than those expressly recited in that claim. Rather, as the following claims reflect, inventive aspects lie in a combination of fewer than all features of any single foregoing disclosed embodiment. Thus, the claims following this Detailed Description are hereby expressly incorporated into this Detailed Description, with each claim standing on its own as a separate embodiment. This disclosure includes all permutations of the independent claims with their dependent claims.


The present technology is illustrated, for example, according to various aspects described below as numbered clauses or embodiments (1, 2, 3, etc.) for convenience. These are provided as examples and do not limit the present technology. It is noted that any of the dependent clauses can be combined in any combination, and placed into a respective independent clause.

    • 1. A method for melting iron in a cupola furnace, the method comprising:
      • receiving a population of coke products and iron in a cupola furnace, wherein the coke products comprise (i) an elongate shape including a length:width dimension of at least 1.5:1, (ii) an ash fusion temperature of no more than 2450° F., and/or (iii) a coke reactivity index (CRI) of at least 30%; and
      • melting the iron in the cupola furnace to form molten iron having a carbon content higher than a carbon content of the received iron.
    • 2. The method of any one of the clauses herein, wherein the coke products comprise a fixed carbon content, and wherein at least 40% of the fixed carbon content is transferred to the molten iron in the cupola.
    • 3. The method of any one of the clauses herein, wherein the coke products comprise a fixed carbon content, the method further comprising oxidizing the coke products in a lower reactivity region of the cupola to produce carbon monoxide, wherein no more than 40% of the fixed carbon content is released via the produced carbon monoxide.
    • 4. The method of any one of the clauses herein, wherein the coke products comprise a fixed carbon content of at least 85%, the method further comprising oxidizing the coke products in a lower reactivity region of the cupola to produce carbon monoxide, wherein no more than 50 lbs/hour of the produced carbon monoxide is released from an upper area of the cupola.
    • 5. The method of any one of the clauses herein, wherein melting the iron comprises melting the iron at a melting rate of at least 22 tons/hour and such that a metal tap temperature of the molten iron is at least 2680° F.
    • 6. The method of any one of the clauses herein, wherein the cupola comprises an upper drying region, and a lower reaction region downstream of the upper drying region, and wherein the coke products comprise a composition configured to inhibit Boudouard reactions of the coke products within the upper drying region and/or promote oxidation reactions of the coke products within the lower reactivity region.
    • 7. The method of any one of the clauses herein, wherein the cupola comprises an upper drying region, and a lower reaction region downstream of the upper drying region, and wherein the method further comprises (i) drying the coke products in the upper drying region, (ii) oxidizing the coke products in the lower reactivity region to produce carbon monoxide, and (iii) combusting the coke products in the lower reactivity region to produce carbon dioxide.
    • 8. The method of clause 7, wherein drying the coke products comprises shrinking a core of individual coke products and forming a diffusion layer comprising ash or iron, wherein the diffusion layer is radially outward of the core and, in operation, inhibits Boudouard reactions within the cupola at the upper drying region.
    • 9. The method of clause 7, wherein oxidizing the coke products comprises shrinking a core of individual coke products and forming (i) a first diffusion layer comprising ash that is radially outward of the core and (ii) a second diffusion layer comprising iron that is radially outward of the core and/or first diffusion layer, wherein, in operation, the first diffusion layer and/or the second diffusion layer inhibits Boudouard reactions within the cupola at the upper drying region.
    • 10. The method of any one of the clauses herein, wherein the ash fusion temperature is no more than 2200° F.
    • 11. The method of any one of the clauses herein, wherein the CRI of the coke products is between 35-45%.
    • 12. The method of any one of the clauses herein, wherein the length:width ratio of at least some of the individual coke products is at least 2:1.
    • 13. The method of any one of the clauses herein, wherein at least some of the individual coke products have a length of at least 8 inches and a width of at least 4 inches.
    • 14. The method of any one of the clauses herein, wherein the coke products have an ash content of 6.0-12.0%.
    • 15. The method of any one of the clauses herein, wherein the coke products have a fixed carbon content of at least 90.0%.
    • 16. The method of any one of the clauses herein, wherein the coke products have a sulfur content of no more than 0.7 wt %.
    • 17. The method of any one of the clauses herein, wherein the coke products have a 2-inch drop shatter of at least 90.0% and/or a 4-inch drop shatter of at least 78%.
    • 18. A system for melting iron, the system comprising:
      • a cupola furnace including a refractory-lined elongate furnace body configured to support coke and iron, and a wind box configured to provide a source of oxygen to the furnace body, wherein the furnace body includes (i) an inlet opening configured to receive the coke and iron, (ii) an outlet configured to provide molten iron; a drying region, and (iii) a reaction region downstream of the drying region, wherein, in operation, the cupola furnace is configured to melt the iron to form, at the outlet of the furnace body, the molten iron having a carbon content higher than a carbon content of the received iron; and
      • a population of coke products disposed within the furnace body at the drying region and the reaction region, wherein individual coke products comprise (i) an elongate shape including a length:width dimension of at least 1.5:1, (ii) an ash fusion temperature no more than 2400° F., and (iii) a coke reactivity index (CRI) of at least 30%.
    • 19. The system of any one of the clauses herein, wherein, in operation, the cupola (i) dries the coke products in the drying region, (ii) oxidizes the coke products in the reactivity region to produce carbon monoxide, and (iii) combusts the coke products in the reactivity region to produce carbon dioxide.
    • 20. The system of clause 19, wherein oxidizing the coke products comprises shrinking a core of individual coke products and forming a diffusion layer comprising ash or iron, and wherein the diffusion layer is radially outward of the core and, in operation, inhibits Boudouard reactions within the cupola at the upper drying region.
    • 21. The method of clause 19, wherein oxidizing the coke products comprises shrinking a core of individual coke products and forming (i) a first diffusion layer comprising ash that is radially outward of the core and (ii) a second diffusion layer comprising iron that is radially outward of the core and first diffusion layer, wherein, in operation, the first diffusion layer and the second diffusion layer inhibits Boudouard reactions within the cupola at the upper drying region.
    • 22. The system of any one of the clauses herein, wherein the ash fusion temperature is no more than 2200° F.
    • 23. The system of any one of the clauses herein, wherein the CRI of the coke products is between 35-45%.
    • 24. The system of any one of the clauses herein, wherein the length:width ratio of at least some of the individual coke products is at least 2:1.
    • 25. The system of any one of the clauses herein, wherein at least some of the individual coke products have a length of 8 inches and a width of 4 inches.
    • 26. The system of any one of the clauses herein, wherein the coke products have an ash content of 7.0-9.0%.
    • 27. The method of any one of the clauses herein, wherein the coke products have a 2-inch drop shatter of at least 90.0% and/or a 4-inch drop shatter of at least 78%.

Claims
  • 1. A method for melting iron in a cupola furnace, the method comprising: receiving a population of coke products and iron in a cupola furnace, wherein the coke products comprise (i) an elongate shape including a length:width dimension of at least 1.5:1, (ii) an ash fusion temperature of no more than 2450° F., and/or (iii) a coke reactivity index (CRI) of at least 30%; andmelting the iron in the cupola furnace to form molten iron having a carbon content higher than a carbon content of the received iron.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, wherein the coke products comprise a fixed carbon content, and wherein at least 40 wt % of the fixed carbon content is transferred to the molten iron in the cupola.
  • 3. The method of claim 1, wherein the coke products comprise a fixed carbon content, the method further comprising oxidizing the coke products in a lower reactivity region of the cupola to produce carbon monoxide, wherein no more than 40 wt % of the fixed carbon content is released via the produced carbon monoxide.
  • 4. The method of claim 1, wherein the coke products comprise a fixed carbon content of at least 85 wt %, the method further comprising oxidizing the coke products in a lower reactivity region of the cupola to produce carbon monoxide, wherein no more than 50 lbs/hour of the produced carbon monoxide is released from an upper area of the cupola.
  • 5. The method of claim 1, wherein melting the iron comprises melting the iron at a melting rate of at least 22 tons/hour and such that a metal tap temperature of the molten iron is at least 2680° F.
  • 6. The method of claim 1, wherein the cupola comprises an upper drying region, and a lower reaction region downstream of the upper drying region, and wherein the coke products comprise a composition configured to inhibit Boudouard reactions of the coke products within the upper drying region and/or promote oxidation reactions of the coke products within the lower reactivity region.
  • 7. The method of claim 1, wherein the cupola comprises an upper drying region, and a lower reaction region downstream of the upper drying region, and wherein the method further comprises (i) drying the coke products in the upper drying region, (ii) oxidizing the coke products in the lower reactivity region to produce carbon monoxide, and (iii) combusting the coke products in the lower reactivity region to produce carbon dioxide.
  • 8. The method of claim 7, wherein drying the coke products comprises shrinking a core of individual coke products and forming a diffusion layer comprising ash or iron, wherein the diffusion layer is radially outward of the core and, in operation, inhibits Boudouard reactions within the cupola at the upper drying region.
  • 9. The method of claim 7, wherein oxidizing the coke products comprises shrinking a core of individual coke products and forming (i) a first diffusion layer comprising ash that is radially outward of the core and (ii) a second diffusion layer comprising iron that is radially outward of the core and/or first diffusion layer, wherein, in operation, the first diffusion layer and/or the second diffusion layer inhibits Boudouard reactions within the cupola at the upper drying region.
  • 10. The method of claim 1, wherein the ash fusion temperature is no more than 2200° F.
  • 11. The method of claim 1, wherein the CRI of the coke products is between 35-45%.
  • 12. The method of claim 1, wherein the length:width ratio of at least some of the individual coke products is at least 2:1.
  • 13. The method of claim 1, wherein at least some of the individual coke products have a length of at least 8 inches and a width of at least 4 inches.
  • 14. The method of claim 1, wherein the coke products have an ash content of 6.0-12.0 wt %.
  • 15. The method of claim 1, wherein the coke products have a fixed carbon content of at least 90.0 wt %.
  • 16. The method of claim 1, wherein the coke products have a sulfur content of no more than 0.7 wt %.
  • 17. The method of claim 1, wherein the coke products have a 2-inch drop shatter of at least 90% and/or a 4-inch drop shatter of at least 78%.
  • 18. A method for melting iron in a cupola furnace, the method comprising: receiving a population of coke products and iron in a cupola furnace, wherein the coke products comprise at least two or more of (i) an elongate shape including a length:width dimension of at least 1.5:1, (ii) an ash fusion temperature of no more than 2450° F., or (iii) a coke reactivity index (CRI) of at least 30%; andmelting the iron in the cupola furnace to form molten iron having a carbon content higher than a carbon content of the received iron.
  • 19. A method for melting iron in a cupola furnace, the method comprising: receiving a population of coke products and iron in a cupola furnace, wherein the coke products comprise (i) an elongate shape including a length:width dimension of at least 1.5:1, (ii) an ash fusion temperature of no more than 2450° F., and (iii) a coke reactivity index (CRI) of at least 30%; andmelting the iron in the cupola furnace to form molten iron having a carbon content higher than a carbon content of the received iron.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

The present application claims the benefit of priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 63/275,891, filed Nov. 4, 2021, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. The present application relates to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 18/052,760, filed Nov. 4, 2022, titled FOUNDRY COKE PRODUCTS, AND ASSOCIATED SYSTEMS, DEVICES, AND METHODS, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.

US Referenced Citations (528)
Number Name Date Kind
425797 Hunt Apr 1890 A
469868 Osbourn Mar 1892 A
705926 Hemingway Jul 1902 A
760372 Beam May 1904 A
845719 Schniewind Feb 1907 A
875989 Garner Jan 1908 A
976580 Krause Jul 1909 A
1140798 Carpenter May 1915 A
1424777 Schondeling Aug 1922 A
1430027 Plantinga Sep 1922 A
1486401 Ackeren Mar 1924 A
1530995 Geiger Mar 1925 A
1572391 Klaiber Feb 1926 A
1677973 Marquard Jul 1928 A
1705039 Thornhill Mar 1929 A
1721813 Geipert Jul 1929 A
1757682 Palm May 1930 A
1818370 Wine Aug 1931 A
1818994 Kreisinger Aug 1931 A
1830951 Lovett Nov 1931 A
1848818 Becker Mar 1932 A
1895202 Montgomery Jan 1933 A
1947499 Schrader et al. Feb 1934 A
1955962 Jones Apr 1934 A
1979507 Underwood Nov 1934 A
2075337 Burnaugh Mar 1937 A
2141035 Daniels Dec 1938 A
2195466 Otto Apr 1940 A
2235970 Wilputte Mar 1941 A
2340283 Vladu Jan 1944 A
2340981 Otto Feb 1944 A
2394173 Harris et al. Feb 1946 A
2424012 Bangham et al. Jul 1947 A
2486199 Nier Oct 1949 A
2609948 Laveley Sep 1952 A
2641575 Otto Jun 1953 A
2649978 Smith Aug 1953 A
2667185 Beavers Jan 1954 A
2723725 Keiffer Nov 1955 A
2756842 Chamberlin et al. Jul 1956 A
2813708 Frey Nov 1957 A
2827424 Homan Mar 1958 A
2873816 Emil et al. Feb 1959 A
2902991 Whitman Sep 1959 A
2907698 Schulz Oct 1959 A
2968083 Lentz et al. Jan 1961 A
3015893 McCreary Jan 1962 A
3026715 Briggs Mar 1962 A
3033764 Hannes May 1962 A
3175961 Samson Mar 1965 A
3199135 Trucker Aug 1965 A
3224805 Clyatt Dec 1965 A
3259551 Thompson, Jr. Jul 1966 A
3265044 Juchtern Aug 1966 A
3267913 Jakob Aug 1966 A
3327521 Briggs Jun 1967 A
3342990 Barrington et al. Sep 1967 A
3444046 Harlow May 1969 A
3444047 Wilde May 1969 A
3448012 Allred Jun 1969 A
3453839 Sabin Jul 1969 A
3462345 Kernan Aug 1969 A
3511030 Brown et al. May 1970 A
3542650 Kulakov Nov 1970 A
3545470 Paton Dec 1970 A
3587198 Hensel Jun 1971 A
3591827 Hall Jul 1971 A
3592742 Thompson Jul 1971 A
3616408 Hickam Oct 1971 A
3623511 Levin Nov 1971 A
3630852 Nashan et al. Dec 1971 A
3652403 Knappstein et al. Mar 1972 A
3676305 Cremer Jul 1972 A
3709794 Kinzler et al. Jan 1973 A
3710551 Sved Jan 1973 A
3746626 Morrison, Jr. Jul 1973 A
3748235 Pries Jul 1973 A
3784034 Thompson Jan 1974 A
3806032 Pries Apr 1974 A
3811572 Tatterson May 1974 A
3836161 Pries Oct 1974 A
3839156 Jakobi et al. Oct 1974 A
3844900 Schulte Oct 1974 A
3857758 Mole Dec 1974 A
3875016 Schmidt-Balve Apr 1975 A
3876143 Rossow et al. Apr 1975 A
3876506 Dix et al. Apr 1975 A
3878053 Hyde Apr 1975 A
3894302 Lasater Jul 1975 A
3897312 Armour et al. Jul 1975 A
3906992 Leach Sep 1975 A
3912091 Thompson Oct 1975 A
3912597 MacDonald Oct 1975 A
3917458 Polak Nov 1975 A
3928144 Jakimowicz Dec 1975 A
3930961 Sustarsic et al. Jan 1976 A
3933443 Lohrmann Jan 1976 A
3957591 Riecker May 1976 A
3959084 Price May 1976 A
3963582 Helm et al. Jun 1976 A
3969191 Bollenbach Jul 1976 A
3975148 Fukuda et al. Aug 1976 A
3979870 Moore Sep 1976 A
3984289 Sustarsic et al. Oct 1976 A
3990948 Lindgren Nov 1976 A
4004702 Szendroi Jan 1977 A
4004983 Pries Jan 1977 A
4025395 Ekholm et al. May 1977 A
4040910 Knappstein et al. Aug 1977 A
4045056 Kandakov et al. Aug 1977 A
4045299 McDonald Aug 1977 A
4059885 Oldengott Nov 1977 A
4065059 Jablin Dec 1977 A
4067462 Thompson Jan 1978 A
4077848 Grainer et al. Mar 1978 A
4083753 Rogers et al. Apr 1978 A
4086231 Ikio Apr 1978 A
4093245 Connor Jun 1978 A
4100033 Holter Jul 1978 A
4100491 Newman, Jr. et al. Jul 1978 A
4100889 Chayes Jul 1978 A
4111757 Carimboli Sep 1978 A
4124450 MacDonald Nov 1978 A
4133720 Franzer et al. Jan 1979 A
4135948 Mertens et al. Jan 1979 A
4141796 Clark et al. Feb 1979 A
4143104 van Konijnenburg et al. Mar 1979 A
4145195 Knappstein et al. Mar 1979 A
4147230 Ormond et al. Apr 1979 A
4162546 Shortell et al. Jul 1979 A
4176013 Garthus et al. Nov 1979 A
4181459 Price Jan 1980 A
4189272 Gregor et al. Feb 1980 A
4194951 Pries Mar 1980 A
4196053 Grohmann Apr 1980 A
4211608 Kwasnoski et al. Jul 1980 A
4211611 Bocsanczy Jul 1980 A
4213489 Cain Jul 1980 A
4213828 Calderon Jul 1980 A
4222748 Argo et al. Sep 1980 A
4222824 Flockenhaus et al. Sep 1980 A
4224109 Flockenhaus et al. Sep 1980 A
4225393 Gregor et al. Sep 1980 A
4226113 Pelletier et al. Oct 1980 A
4230498 Ruecki Oct 1980 A
4235830 Bennett et al. Nov 1980 A
4239602 La Bate Dec 1980 A
4248671 Belding Feb 1981 A
4249997 Schmitz Feb 1981 A
4263099 Porter Apr 1981 A
4268360 Tsuzuki et al. May 1981 A
4271814 Lister Jun 1981 A
4284478 Brommel Aug 1981 A
4285772 Kress Aug 1981 A
4287024 Thompson Sep 1981 A
4289479 Johnson Sep 1981 A
4289584 Chuss et al. Sep 1981 A
4289585 Wagener et al. Sep 1981 A
4296938 Offermann et al. Oct 1981 A
4298497 Colombo Nov 1981 A
4299666 Ostmann Nov 1981 A
4302935 Cousimano Dec 1981 A
4303615 Jarmell et al. Dec 1981 A
4307673 Caughey Dec 1981 A
4314787 Kwasnik et al. Feb 1982 A
4316435 Nagamatsu et al. Feb 1982 A
4324568 Wilcox et al. Apr 1982 A
4330372 Cairns et al. May 1982 A
4334963 Stog Jun 1982 A
4336107 Irwin Jun 1982 A
4336843 Petty Jun 1982 A
4340445 Kucher et al. Jul 1982 A
4342195 Lo Aug 1982 A
4344820 Thompson Aug 1982 A
4344822 Schwartz et al. Aug 1982 A
4353189 Thiersch et al. Oct 1982 A
4366029 Bixby et al. Dec 1982 A
4373244 Mertens et al. Feb 1983 A
4375388 Hara et al. Mar 1983 A
4385962 Stewen et al. May 1983 A
4391674 Velmin et al. Jul 1983 A
4392824 Struck et al. Jul 1983 A
4394217 Holz et al. Jul 1983 A
4395269 Schuler Jul 1983 A
4396394 Li et al. Aug 1983 A
4396461 Neubaum et al. Aug 1983 A
4406619 Oldengott Sep 1983 A
4407237 Merritt Oct 1983 A
4421070 Sullivan Dec 1983 A
4431484 Weber et al. Feb 1984 A
4439277 Dix Mar 1984 A
4440098 Adams Apr 1984 A
4445977 Husher May 1984 A
4446018 Cerwick May 1984 A
4448541 Lucas May 1984 A
4452749 Kolvek et al. Jun 1984 A
4459103 Gieskieng Jul 1984 A
4469446 Goodboy Sep 1984 A
4474344 Bennett Oct 1984 A
4487137 Horvat et al. Dec 1984 A
4498786 Ruscheweyh Feb 1985 A
4506025 Kleeb et al. Mar 1985 A
4508539 Nakai Apr 1985 A
4518461 Gelfand May 1985 A
4527488 Lindgren Jul 1985 A
4564420 Spindeler et al. Jan 1986 A
4568426 Orlando Feb 1986 A
4570670 Johnson Feb 1986 A
4614567 Stahlherm et al. Sep 1986 A
4643327 Campbell Feb 1987 A
4645513 Kubota et al. Feb 1987 A
4655193 Blacket Apr 1987 A
4655804 Kercheval et al. Apr 1987 A
4666675 Parker et al. May 1987 A
4680167 Orlando Jul 1987 A
4690689 Malcosky et al. Sep 1987 A
4704195 Janicka et al. Nov 1987 A
4720262 Durr et al. Jan 1988 A
4724976 Lee Feb 1988 A
4726465 Kwasnik et al. Feb 1988 A
4732652 Durselen et al. Mar 1988 A
4749446 van Laar et al. Jun 1988 A
4793981 Doyle et al. Dec 1988 A
4821473 Cowell Apr 1989 A
4824614 Jones et al. Apr 1989 A
4889698 Moller et al. Dec 1989 A
4898021 Weaver et al. Feb 1990 A
4918975 Voss Apr 1990 A
4919170 Kallinich et al. Apr 1990 A
4929179 Breidenbach et al. May 1990 A
4941824 Holter et al. Jul 1990 A
5052922 Stokman et al. Oct 1991 A
5062925 Durselen et al. Nov 1991 A
5078822 Hodges et al. Jan 1992 A
5087328 Wegerer et al. Feb 1992 A
5114542 Childress et al. May 1992 A
5213138 Presz May 1993 A
5227106 Kolvek Jul 1993 A
5228955 Westbrook, III Jul 1993 A
5234601 Janke et al. Aug 1993 A
5318671 Pruitt Jun 1994 A
5370218 Johnson et al. Dec 1994 A
5398543 Fukushima et al. Mar 1995 A
5423152 Kolvek Jun 1995 A
5447606 Pruitt Sep 1995 A
5480594 Wilkerson et al. Jan 1996 A
5542650 Abel et al. Aug 1996 A
5597452 Hippe et al. Jan 1997 A
5603810 Michler Feb 1997 A
5622280 Mays et al. Apr 1997 A
5659110 Herden et al. Aug 1997 A
5670025 Baird Sep 1997 A
5687768 Albrecht et al. Nov 1997 A
5705037 Reinke et al. Jan 1998 A
5715962 McDonnell Feb 1998 A
5720855 Baird Feb 1998 A
5745969 Yamada et al. May 1998 A
5752548 Matsumoto et al. May 1998 A
5787821 Bhat et al. Aug 1998 A
5810032 Hong et al. Sep 1998 A
5816210 Yamaguchi Oct 1998 A
5857308 Dismore et al. Jan 1999 A
5881551 Dang Mar 1999 A
5913448 Mann et al. Jun 1999 A
5928476 Daniels Jul 1999 A
5966886 Di Loreto Oct 1999 A
5968320 Sprague Oct 1999 A
6002993 Naito et al. Dec 1999 A
6003706 Rosen Dec 1999 A
6017214 Sturgulewski Jan 2000 A
6022112 Isler et al. Feb 2000 A
6059932 Sturgulewski May 2000 A
6126910 Wilhelm et al. Oct 2000 A
6139692 Tamura et al. Oct 2000 A
6152668 Knoch Nov 2000 A
6156688 Ando et al. Dec 2000 A
6173679 Bruckner et al. Jan 2001 B1
6187148 Sturgulewski Feb 2001 B1
6189819 Racine Feb 2001 B1
6290494 Barkdoll Sep 2001 B1
6412221 Emsbo Jul 2002 B1
6495268 Harth, III et al. Dec 2002 B1
6539602 Ozawa et al. Apr 2003 B1
6596128 Westbrook Jul 2003 B2
6626984 Taylor Sep 2003 B1
6699035 Brooker Mar 2004 B2
6712576 Skarzenski et al. Mar 2004 B2
6758875 Reid et al. Jul 2004 B2
6786941 Reeves et al. Sep 2004 B2
6830660 Yamauchi et al. Dec 2004 B1
6907895 Johnson et al. Jun 2005 B2
6946011 Snyder Sep 2005 B2
6964236 Schucker Nov 2005 B2
7056390 Fratello Jun 2006 B2
7077892 Lee Jul 2006 B2
7314060 Chen et al. Jan 2008 B2
7331298 Barkdoll et al. Feb 2008 B2
7433743 Pistikopoulos et al. Oct 2008 B2
7497930 Barkdoll et al. Mar 2009 B2
7547377 Inamasu et al. Jun 2009 B2
7611609 Valia et al. Nov 2009 B1
7644711 Creel Jan 2010 B2
7722843 Srinivasachar May 2010 B1
7727307 Winkler Jun 2010 B2
7785447 Eatough et al. Aug 2010 B2
7803627 Hodges et al. Sep 2010 B2
7823401 Takeuchi et al. Nov 2010 B2
7827689 Crane Nov 2010 B2
7998316 Barkdoll Aug 2011 B2
8071060 Ukai et al. Dec 2011 B2
8079751 Kapila et al. Dec 2011 B2
8080088 Srinivasachar Dec 2011 B1
8146376 Williams et al. Apr 2012 B1
8152970 Barkdoll et al. Apr 2012 B2
8172930 Barkdoll May 2012 B2
8236142 Westbrook Aug 2012 B2
8266853 Bloom et al. Sep 2012 B2
8311777 Suguira et al. Nov 2012 B2
8383055 Palmer Feb 2013 B2
8398935 Howell et al. Mar 2013 B2
8409405 Kim et al. Apr 2013 B2
8500881 Orita et al. Aug 2013 B2
8515508 Kawamura et al. Aug 2013 B2
8568568 Schuecker et al. Oct 2013 B2
8640635 Bloom et al. Feb 2014 B2
8647476 Kim et al. Feb 2014 B2
8800795 Hwang Aug 2014 B2
8956995 Masatsugu et al. Feb 2015 B2
8980063 Kim et al. Mar 2015 B2
9039869 Kim et al. May 2015 B2
9057023 Reichelt et al. Jun 2015 B2
9103234 Gu et al. Aug 2015 B2
9169439 Sarpen et al. Oct 2015 B2
9193913 Quanci et al. Nov 2015 B2
9193915 West et al. Nov 2015 B2
9200225 Barkdoll et al. Dec 2015 B2
9238778 Quanci et al. Jan 2016 B2
9243186 Quanci et al. Jan 2016 B2
9249357 Quanci et al. Feb 2016 B2
9273249 Quanci et al. Mar 2016 B2
9273250 Choi et al. Mar 2016 B2
9321965 Barkdoll Apr 2016 B2
9359554 Quanci et al. Jun 2016 B2
9404043 Kim Aug 2016 B2
9463980 Fukada et al. Oct 2016 B2
9476547 Quanci et al. Oct 2016 B2
9498786 Pearson Nov 2016 B2
9580656 Quanci et al. Feb 2017 B2
9672499 Quanci et al. Jun 2017 B2
9683740 Rodgers et al. Jun 2017 B2
9708542 Quanci et al. Jul 2017 B2
9862888 Quanci et al. Jan 2018 B2
9976089 Quanci et al. May 2018 B2
10016714 Quanci et al. Jul 2018 B2
10041002 Quanci et al. Aug 2018 B2
10047295 Chun et al. Aug 2018 B2
10047296 Chun et al. Aug 2018 B2
10053627 Sarpen et al. Aug 2018 B2
10233392 Quanci et al. Mar 2019 B2
10308876 Quanci et al. Jun 2019 B2
10323192 Quanci et al. Jun 2019 B2
10392563 Kim et al. Aug 2019 B2
10435042 Weymouth Oct 2019 B1
10526541 West et al. Jan 2020 B2
10526542 Quanci et al. Jan 2020 B2
10578521 Dinakaran et al. Mar 2020 B1
10611965 Quanci et al. Apr 2020 B2
10619101 Quanci et al. Apr 2020 B2
10732621 Cella et al. Aug 2020 B2
10760002 Ball et al. Sep 2020 B2
10851306 Crum et al. Dec 2020 B2
10877007 Steele et al. Dec 2020 B2
10883051 Quanci et al. Jan 2021 B2
10920148 Quanci et al. Feb 2021 B2
10927303 Choi et al. Feb 2021 B2
10947455 Quanci et al. Mar 2021 B2
10968393 West et al. Apr 2021 B2
10968395 Quanci et al. Apr 2021 B2
10975309 Quanci et al. Apr 2021 B2
10975310 Quanci et al. Apr 2021 B2
10975311 Quanci et al. Apr 2021 B2
1378782 Floyd May 2021 A1
11008517 Chun et al. May 2021 B2
11008518 Quanci et al. May 2021 B2
11021655 Quanci et al. Jun 2021 B2
11053444 Quanci et al. Jul 2021 B2
11060032 Quanci et al. Jul 2021 B2
11071935 Quanci et al. Jul 2021 B2
11098252 Quanci et al. Aug 2021 B2
11117087 Quanci Sep 2021 B2
11142699 West et al. Oct 2021 B2
11186778 Crum et al. Nov 2021 B2
11193069 Quanci et al. Dec 2021 B2
11214739 Quanci et al. Jan 2022 B2
11261381 Quanci et al. Mar 2022 B2
11359145 Ball et al. Jun 2022 B2
11359146 Quanci et al. Jun 2022 B2
11365355 Quanci et al. Jun 2022 B2
11395989 Quanci et al. Jul 2022 B2
1429346 Horn Sep 2022 A1
11441077 Quanci et al. Sep 2022 B2
11441078 Quanci et al. Sep 2022 B2
20020170605 Shiraishi et al. Nov 2002 A1
20030014954 Ronning et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030015809 Carson Jan 2003 A1
20030057083 Eatough et al. Mar 2003 A1
20040016377 Johnson et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040220840 Bonissone et al. Nov 2004 A1
20050087767 Fitzgerald et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050096759 Benjamin et al. May 2005 A1
20060029532 Breen et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060102420 Huber et al. May 2006 A1
20060149407 Markham et al. Jul 2006 A1
20070087946 Quest et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070102278 Inamasu et al. May 2007 A1
20070116619 Taylor et al. May 2007 A1
20070251198 Witter Nov 2007 A1
20080028935 Andersson Feb 2008 A1
20080179165 Chen et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080250863 Moore Oct 2008 A1
20080257236 Green Oct 2008 A1
20080271985 Yamasaki Nov 2008 A1
20080289305 Girondi Nov 2008 A1
20090007785 Kimura et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090032385 Engle Feb 2009 A1
20090105852 Wintrich et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090152092 Kim et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090162269 Barger et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090217576 Kim et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090257932 Canari et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090283395 Hippe Nov 2009 A1
20100015564 Chun et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100095521 Kartal et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100106310 Grohman Apr 2010 A1
20100113266 Abe et al. May 2010 A1
20100115912 Worley May 2010 A1
20100119425 Palmer May 2010 A1
20100181297 Whysail Jul 2010 A1
20100196597 Di Loreto Aug 2010 A1
20100276269 Schuecker et al. Nov 2010 A1
20100287871 Bloom et al. Nov 2010 A1
20100300867 Kim et al. Dec 2010 A1
20100314234 Knoch et al. Dec 2010 A1
20110000284 Kumar et al. Jan 2011 A1
20110014406 Coleman et al. Jan 2011 A1
20110048917 Kim et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110083314 Baird Apr 2011 A1
20110088600 McRae Apr 2011 A1
20110120852 Kim May 2011 A1
20110144406 Masatsugu et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110156902 Wang et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110168482 Merchant et al. Jul 2011 A1
20110174301 Haydock et al. Jul 2011 A1
20110192395 Kim Aug 2011 A1
20110198206 Kim et al. Aug 2011 A1
20110223088 Chang et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110253521 Kim Oct 2011 A1
20110291827 Baldocchi et al. Dec 2011 A1
20110313218 Dana Dec 2011 A1
20110315538 Kim et al. Dec 2011 A1
20120031076 Frank et al. Feb 2012 A1
20120125709 Merchant et al. May 2012 A1
20120152720 Reichelt et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120177541 Mutsuda et al. Jul 2012 A1
20120179421 Dasgupta Jul 2012 A1
20120180133 Ai-Harbi et al. Jul 2012 A1
20120195815 Moore et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120228115 Westbrook Sep 2012 A1
20120247939 Kim et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120305380 Wang et al. Dec 2012 A1
20120312019 Rechtman Dec 2012 A1
20130020781 Kishikawa Jan 2013 A1
20130045149 Miller Feb 2013 A1
20130213114 Wetzig et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130216717 Rago et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130220373 Kim Aug 2013 A1
20130306462 Kim et al. Nov 2013 A1
20140039833 Sharpe, Jr. et al. Feb 2014 A1
20140156584 Motukuri et al. Jun 2014 A1
20140208997 Alferyev et al. Jul 2014 A1
20140224123 Walters Aug 2014 A1
20150041304 Kiim et al. Feb 2015 A1
20150122629 Freimuth et al. May 2015 A1
20150143908 Cetinkaya May 2015 A1
20150175433 Micka et al. Jun 2015 A1
20150176095 Connors Jun 2015 A1
20150219530 Li et al. Aug 2015 A1
20150226499 Mikkelsen Aug 2015 A1
20160026193 Rhodes et al. Jan 2016 A1
20160048139 Samples et al. Feb 2016 A1
20160149944 Obermeirer et al. May 2016 A1
20160154171 Kato et al. Jun 2016 A1
20160370082 Olivo Dec 2016 A1
20170173519 Naito Jun 2017 A1
20170182447 Sappok et al. Jun 2017 A1
20170226425 Kim et al. Aug 2017 A1
20170261417 Zhang Sep 2017 A1
20170313943 Valdevies Nov 2017 A1
20170352243 Quanci et al. Dec 2017 A1
20190317167 LaBorde et al. Oct 2019 A1
20200071190 Wiederin et al. Mar 2020 A1
20200139273 Badiei May 2020 A1
20200173679 O'Reilly et al. Jun 2020 A1
20200208059 Quanci et al. Jul 2020 A1
20200208063 Quanci et al. Jul 2020 A1
20200208833 Quanci et al. Jul 2020 A1
20210130697 Quanci et al. May 2021 A1
20210163821 Quanci et al. Jun 2021 A1
20210163823 Quanci et al. Jun 2021 A1
20210198579 Quanci et al. Jul 2021 A1
20210261877 Despen et al. Aug 2021 A1
20210340454 Quanci Nov 2021 A1
20210363426 West et al. Nov 2021 A1
20210363427 Quanci et al. Nov 2021 A1
20210371752 Quanci et al. Dec 2021 A1
20210388270 Choi et al. Dec 2021 A1
20220056342 Quanci et al. Feb 2022 A1
20220106527 Quanci et al. Apr 2022 A1
20220195303 Quanci et al. Jun 2022 A1
20220204858 West et al. Jun 2022 A1
20220204859 Crum et al. Jun 2022 A1
20220226766 Quanci et al. Jul 2022 A1
20220251452 Quanci et al. Aug 2022 A1
20220298423 Quanci et al. Sep 2022 A1
20220325183 Quanci et al. Oct 2022 A1
20220356410 Quanci et al. Nov 2022 A1
20230012031 Quanci et al. Jan 2023 A1
20230258326 Quanci et al. Aug 2023 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (204)
Number Date Country
1172895 Aug 1984 CA
2775992 May 2011 CA
2822841 Jul 2012 CA
2822857 Jul 2012 CA
2905110 Sep 2014 CA
87212113 Jun 1988 CN
87107195 Jul 1988 CN
2064363 Oct 1990 CN
2139121 Jul 1993 CN
1092457 Sep 1994 CN
1255528 Jun 2000 CN
1270983 Oct 2000 CN
2528771 Feb 2002 CN
1358822 Jul 2002 CN
2521473 Nov 2002 CN
1468364 Jan 2004 CN
1527872 Sep 2004 CN
2668641 Jan 2005 CN
1957204 May 2007 CN
101037603 Sep 2007 CN
101058731 Oct 2007 CN
101157874 Apr 2008 CN
101211495 Jul 2008 CN
201121178 Sep 2008 CN
101395248 Mar 2009 CN
100510004 Jul 2009 CN
101486017 Jul 2009 CN
201264981 Jul 2009 CN
101497835 Aug 2009 CN
101509427 Aug 2009 CN
101886466 Nov 2010 CN
101910530 Dec 2010 CN
102072829 May 2011 CN
102155300 Aug 2011 CN
2509188 Nov 2011 CN
202226816 May 2012 CN
202265541 Jun 2012 CN
102584294 Jul 2012 CN
202415446 Sep 2012 CN
202470353 Oct 2012 CN
103399536 Nov 2013 CN
103468289 Dec 2013 CN
103913193 Jul 2014 CN
203981700 Dec 2014 CN
104498059 Apr 2015 CN
105001914 Oct 2015 CN
105137947 Dec 2015 CN
105189704 Dec 2015 CN
105264448 Jan 2016 CN
105467949 Apr 2016 CN
106661456 May 2017 CN
106687564 May 2017 CN
107445633 Dec 2017 CN
100500619 Jun 2020 CN
2212544 Jan 1973 DE
2720688 Nov 1978 DE
3231697 Jan 1984 DE
3328702 Feb 1984 DE
3315738 Mar 1984 DE
3329367 Nov 1984 DE
3407487 Jun 1985 DE
10122531 Nov 2002 DE
10154785 May 2003 DE
102005015301 Oct 2006 DE
102006004669 Aug 2007 DE
102006026521 Dec 2007 DE
102009031436 Jan 2011 DE
102011052785 Dec 2012 DE
010510 Oct 2008 EA
0126399 Nov 1984 EP
0208490 Jan 1987 EP
0903393 Mar 1999 EP
1538503 Jun 2005 EP
1860034 Nov 2007 EP
2295129 Mar 2011 EP
2468837 Jun 2012 EP
2517802 Jun 1983 FR
2764978 Dec 1998 FR
364236 Jan 1932 GB
368649 Mar 1932 GB
441784 Jan 1936 GB
606340 Aug 1948 GB
611524 Nov 1948 GB
725865 Mar 1955 GB
871094 Jun 1961 GB
923205 May 1963 GB
S5319301 Feb 1978 JP
S5453103 Apr 1979 JP
S57172978 Oct 1982 JP
60004588 Jan 1985 JP
62285980 Dec 1987 JP
01103694 Apr 1989 JP
01249886 Oct 1989 JP
03197588 Aug 1991 JP
04159392 Jun 1992 JP
H04178494 Jun 1992 JP
H05230466 Sep 1993 JP
H0649450 Feb 1994 JP
H0654753 Jul 1994 JP
H06264062 Sep 1994 JP
H06299156 Oct 1994 JP
07188668 Jul 1995 JP
07216357 Aug 1995 JP
H07204432 Aug 1995 JP
H0843314 Feb 1996 JP
H08104875 Apr 1996 JP
08127778 May 1996 JP
H08218071 Aug 1996 JP
H10273672 Oct 1998 JP
H11131074 May 1999 JP
H11256166 Sep 1999 JP
2000204373 Jul 2000 JP
2000219883 Aug 2000 JP
2001055576 Feb 2001 JP
2001200258 Jul 2001 JP
2002097472 Apr 2002 JP
2002106941 Apr 2002 JP
2003041258 Feb 2003 JP
2003051082 Feb 2003 JP
2003071313 Mar 2003 JP
2003292968 Oct 2003 JP
2003342581 Dec 2003 JP
2004169016 Jun 2004 JP
2005503448 Feb 2005 JP
2005135422 May 2005 JP
2005154597 Jun 2005 JP
2005263983 Sep 2005 JP
2005344085 Dec 2005 JP
2006188608 Jul 2006 JP
2007063420 Mar 2007 JP
3924064 Jun 2007 JP
2007231326 Sep 2007 JP
4101226 Jun 2008 JP
2008231278 Oct 2008 JP
2009019106 Jan 2009 JP
2009073864 Apr 2009 JP
2009073865 Apr 2009 JP
2009135276 Jun 2009 JP
2009144121 Jul 2009 JP
2010229239 Oct 2010 JP
2010248389 Nov 2010 JP
2011504947 Feb 2011 JP
2011068733 Apr 2011 JP
2011102351 May 2011 JP
2012102302 May 2012 JP
2012102325 May 2012 JP
2013006957 Jan 2013 JP
2013510910 Mar 2013 JP
2013189322 Sep 2013 JP
2014040502 Mar 2014 JP
2015094091 May 2015 JP
2016169897 Sep 2016 JP
1019990054426 Jul 1999 KR
20000042375 Jul 2000 KR
100296700 Oct 2001 KR
20030012458 Feb 2003 KR
1020040020883 Mar 2004 KR
20040107204 Dec 2004 KR
20050053861 Jun 2005 KR
20060132336 Dec 2006 KR
100737393 Jul 2007 KR
100797852 Jan 2008 KR
20080069170 Jul 2008 KR
20110010452 Feb 2011 KR
101314288 Apr 2011 KR
20120033091 Apr 2012 KR
20130050807 May 2013 KR
101318388 Oct 2013 KR
20140042526 Apr 2014 KR
20150011084 Jan 2015 KR
20170038102 Apr 2017 KR
20170058808 May 2017 KR
20170103857 Sep 2017 KR
101862491 May 2018 KR
2083532 Jul 1997 RU
2441898 Feb 2012 RU
2493233 Sep 2013 RU
201241166 Oct 2012 TW
201245431 Nov 2012 TW
50580 Oct 2002 UA
WO9012074 Oct 1990 WO
WO9945083 Sep 1999 WO
WO02062922 Aug 2002 WO
WO2005023649 Mar 2005 WO
WO2005031297 Apr 2005 WO
WO2005115583 Dec 2005 WO
WO2007103649 Sep 2007 WO
WO2008034424 Mar 2008 WO
WO2008105269 Sep 2008 WO
WO2009147983 Dec 2009 WO
WO2010103992 Sep 2010 WO
WO2011000447 Jan 2011 WO
WO2011126043 Oct 2011 WO
WO2012029979 Mar 2012 WO
WO2012031726 Mar 2012 WO
WO2013023872 Feb 2013 WO
WO2010107513 Sep 2013 WO
WO2014021909 Feb 2014 WO
WO2014043667 Mar 2014 WO
WO2014105064 Jul 2014 WO
WO2014153050 Sep 2014 WO
WO2016004106 Jan 2016 WO
WO2016033511 Mar 2016 WO
WO2016086322 Jun 2016 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (173)
Entry
ASM Handbook, Cupola Furnaces, 2008 (Year: 2008).
Chaudhari, Keval, Cupola Furnace, engineersgalary.com Jan. 24, 2016 (Year: 2016).
U.S. Appl. No. 18/168,142, filed Feb. 13, 2023, Quanci et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 18/313,647, filed May 8, 2023, Quanci et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 18/321,530, filed May 22, 2023, Quanci et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 18/363,465, filed Aug. 1, 2023, Quanci et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 18/363,508, filed Aug. 1, 2023, Choi et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 18/366,244, filed Aug. 7, 2023, Quanci et al.
“ASBESTOS”, Virginia Department of Health, https://www.vdh.virginia.gov/environmental-health/public-health-toxicology/asbestos/, updated 2023, 2 pages.
“Ceramic fibers wool—to 1,300° C”, gTeek, Dec. 29, 2017 (date obtained from google search tools), https://www.gteek.com/ceramic-fibers-wool-to1-300-%C2%B0C, 15 pages.
De Cordova, et al. “Coke oven life prolongation—A multidisciplinary approach.” 10.5151/2594-357X-2610 (2015) 12 pages.
“How Glass Is Made,” Corning, https://www.corning.com/worldwide/en/innovation/materials-science/glass/how-glass-made.html, 2 pages.
Kusiorowski, et al., “Thermal decomposition of different types of absestos,” Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry—Feb. 2012, 109, 693-704 (2012).
Lin, Rongying et al., “Study on the synergistic effect of calcium and aluminum on improving ash fusion temperature of semi-coke,” International Journal of Coal Preparation and Utilization, May 31, 2019 (published online), vol. 42, No. 3, pp. 556-564.
Lipunov, et al. “Diagnostics of the Heating System and Lining of Coke Ovens,” Coke and Chemistry, 2014, Vopl. 57, No. 12, pp. 489-492.
Tiwari, et al., “A novel technique for assessing the coking potential of coals/cole blends for non-recovery coke making process,” Fuel, vol. 107, May 2013, pp. 615-622.
U.S. Appl. No. 17/843,164, filed Jun. 17, 2022, Quanci et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 17/947,520, filed Sep. 19, 2022, Quanci et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 17/967,615, filed Oct. 17, 2022, Quanci et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 18/047,916, filed Oct. 19, 2022, Quanci et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 18/052,760, filed Nov. 4, 2022, Quanci et al.
ASTM D5341-99(2010)e1, Standard Test Method for Measuring Coke Reactivity Index (CRI) and Coke Strength After Reaction (CSR), ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2010.
Astrom, et al., “Feedback Systems: An Introduction for Scientists and Engineers,” Sep. 16, 2006, available on line at http://people/duke.edu/-hpgavin/SystemID/References/Astrom-Feedback-2006.pdf ; 404 pages.
Basset et al., “Calculation of steady flow pressure loss coefficients for pipe junctions,” Proc Instn Mech Engrs., vol. 215, Part C, p. 861-881 IMechIE 2001.
Beckman et al., “Possibilities and limits of cutting back coking plant output,” Stahl Und Eisen, Verlag Stahleisen, Dusseldorf, DE, vol. 130, No. 8, Aug. 16, 2010, pp. 57-67.
Bloom, et al., “Modular cast block—The future of coke oven repairs,” Iron & Steel Technol, AIST, Warrendale, PA, vol. 4, No. 3, Mar. 1, 2007, pp. 61-64.
Boyes, Walt. (2003), Instrumentation Reference Book (3rd Edition)—34.7.4.6 Infrared and Thermal Cameras, Elsevier. Online version available at: https://app.knovel.com/hotlink/pdf/id:kt004QMGV6/instrumentation-reference-2/ditigal-video.
Clean coke process: process development studies by USS Engineers and Consultants, Inc., Wisconsin Tech Search, request date Oct. 5, 2011, 17 pages.
“Conveyor Chain Designer Guild”, Mar. 27, 2014 (date obtained from wayback machine), Renold.com, Section 4, available online at: http://www.renold/com/upload/renoldswitzerland/conveyor_chain _-_designer_guide.pdf.
Costa, et al., “Edge Effects on the Flow Characteristics in a 90 deg Tee Junction,” Transactions of the ASME, Nov. 2006, vol. 128, pp. 1204-1217.
Crelling, et al., “Effects of Weathered Coal on Coking Properties and Coke Quality”, Fuel, 1979, vol. 58, Issue 7, pp. 542-546.
Database WPI, Week 199115, Thomson Scientific, Lond, GB; AN 1991-107552.
Diez, et al., “Coal for Metallurgical Coke Production: Predictions of Coke Quality and Future Requirements for Cokemaking”, International Journal of Coal Geology, 2002, vol. 50, Issue 1-4, pp. 389-412.
“High Alumina Cement-Manufacture, Characteristics and Uses,” TheConstructor.org, https://theconstructor.org/concrete/high-alumina-cement/23686/; 12 pages.
Joseph, B., “A tutorial on inferential control and its applications,” Proceedings of the 1999 American Control Conference (Cat. No. 99CH36251), San Diego, CA, 1999, pp. 3106-3118 vol. 5.
Kerlin, Thomas (1999), Practical Thermocouple Thermometry—1.1 The Thermocouple. ISA. Online version available at https:app.knovel.com/pdf/id:kt007XPTM3/practical-thermocouple/the-thermocouple.
Kochanski et al., “Overview of Uhde Heat Recovery Cokemaking Technology,” AISTech Iron and Steel Technology Conference Proceedings, Association for Iron and Steel Technology, U.S., vol. 1, Jan. 1, 2005, pp. 25-32.
Knoerzer et al. “Jewell-Thompson Non-Recovery Cokemaking”, Steel Times, Fuel & Metallurgical Journals Ltd. London, GB, vol. 221, No. 4, Apr. 1, 1993, pp. 172-173,184.
Madias, et al., “A review on stamped charging of coals” (2013). Available at https://www.researchgate.net/publication/263887759_A_review_on_stamped_charging_of_coals.
Metallurgical Coke MSDS, ArcelorMittal, May 30, 2011, available online at http://dofasco.arcelormittal.com/-/media/Files/A/Arcelormittal-Canada/material-safety/metallurgical-coke.pdf.
“Middletown Coke Company HRSG Maintenance BACT Analysis Option 1—Individual Spray Quenches Sun Heat Recovery Coke Facility Process Flow Diagram Middletown Coke Company 100 Oven Case #1-24.5 VM”, (Sep. 1, 2009), URL: http://web.archive.org/web/20090901042738/http://epa.ohio.gov/portals/27/transfer/ptiApplication/mcc/new/262504.pdf, (Feb. 12, 2016), XP055249803 [X] 1-13 * p. 7 * * pp. 8-11 *.
“Refractory Castables,” Victas.com, Dec. 28, 2011 (date obtained from WayBack Machine), https://www/vitcas.com/refactory-castables; 5 pages.
Rose, Harold J., “The Selection of Coals for the Manufacture of Coke,” American Institute of Mining and Metallurgical Engineers, Feb. 1926, 8 pages.
Waddell, et al., “Heat-Recovery Cokemaking Presentation,” Jan. 1999, pp. 1-25.
Walker D N et al., “Sun Coke Company's heat recovery cokemaking technology high coke quality and low environmental impact”, Revue De Metallurgie—Cahiers D'Informations Techniques, Revue De Metallurgie. Paris, FR, (Mar. 1, 2003), vol. 100, No. 3, ISSN 0035-1563, p. 23.
Westbrook, “Heat-Recovery Cokemaking at Sun Coke,” AISE Steel Technology, Pittsburg, PA, vol. 76, No. 1, Jan. 1999, pp. 25-28.
“What is dead-band control,” forum post by user “wireaddict” on AllAboutCircuits.com message board, Feb. 8, 2007, accessed Oct. 24, 2018 at https:/forum.allaboutcircuits.com/threads/what-is-dead-band-control.4728/; 8 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 18/313,622, filed May 8, 2023, Quanci et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 18/466,549, filed Sep. 13, 2023, Quanci et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 18/469,704, filed Sep. 19, 2023, Crum et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 18/473,135, filed Sep. 22, 2023, Quanci et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 18/473,143, filed Sep. 22, 2023, Quanci et al.
U.S. Appl. No. 07/587,742, filed Sep. 25, 1990, now U.S. Pat. No. 5,114,542, titled Nonrecovery Coke Oven Battery and Method of Operation.
U.S. Appl. No. 07/878,904, filed May 6, 1992, now U.S. Pat. No. 5,318,671, titled Method of Operation of Nonrecovery Coke Oven Battery.
U.S. Appl. No. 09/783,195, filed Feb. 14, 2001, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,596,128, titled Coke Oven Flue Gas Sharing.
U.S. Appl. No. 07/886,804, filed May 22, 1992, now U.S. Pat. No. 5,228,955, titled High Strength Coke Oven Wall Having Gas Flues Therein.
U.S. Appl. No. 08/059,673, filed May 12, 1993, now U.S. Pat. No. 5,447,606, titled Method of and Apparatus for Capturing Coke Oven Charging Emissions.
U.S. Appl. No. 08/914,140, filed Aug. 19, 1997, now U.S. Pat. No. 5,928,476, titled Nonrecovery Coke Oven Door.
U.S. Appl. No. 09/680,187, filed Oct. 5, 2000, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,290,494, titled Method and Apparatus for Coal Coking.
U.S. Appl. No. 10/933,866, filed Sep. 3, 2004, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,331,298, titled Coke Oven Rotary Wedge Door Latch.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/424,566, filed Jun. 16, 2006, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,497,930, titled Method and Apparatus for Compacting Coal for a Coal Coking Process.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/405,269, filed Mar. 17, 2009, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,998,316, titled Flat Push Coke Wet Quenching Apparatus and Process.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/205,960, filed Aug. 9, 2011, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,321,965, titled Flat Push Coke Wet Quenching Apparatus and Process.
U.S. Appl. No. 11/367,236, filed Mar. 3, 2006, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,152,970, titled Method and Apparatus for Producing Coke.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/403,391, filed Mar. 13, 2009, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,172,930, titled Cleanable in Situ Spark Arrestor.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/849,192, filed Aug. 3, 2010, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,200,225, titled Method and Apparatus for Compacting Coal for a Coal Coking Process.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/631,215, filed Sep. 28, 2012, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,683,740, titled Methods for Handling Coal Processing Emissions and Associated Systems and Devices.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/730,692, filed Dec. 28, 2012, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,193,913, titled Reduced Output Rate Coke Oven Operation With Gas Sharing Providing Extended Process Cycle.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/655,204, now U.S. Pat. No. 10,016,714, filed Jun. 24, 2015, titled Systems and Methods for Removing Mercury From Emissions.
U.S. Appl. No. 16/000,516, now U.S. Pat. No. 11,117,087, filed Jun. 5, 2018, titled Systems and Methods for Removing Mercury From Emissions.
U.S. Appl. No. 17/459,380, filed Jun. 5, 2018, titled Systems and Methods for Removing Mercury From Emissions.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/830,971, filed Mar. 14, 2013, now U.S. Pat. No. 10,047,296, titled Non-Perpendicular Connections Between Coke Oven Uptakes and a Hot Common Tunnel, and Associated Systems and Methods, now U.S. Pat. No. 10,047,295.
U.S. Appl. No. 16/026,363, filed Jul. 3, 2018, now U.S. Pat. No. 11,008,517, titled Non-Perpendicular Connections Between Coke Oven Uptakes and a Hot Common Tunnel, and Associated Systems and Methods.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/730,796, filed Dec. 28, 2012, now U.S. Pat. No. 10,883,051, titled Methods and Systems for Improved Coke Quenching.
U.S. Appl. No. 17/140,564, filed Jan. 4, 2021, titled Methods and Systems for Improved Coke Quenching.
U.S. Appl. No. 18/473,143, filed Sep. 22, 2023, titled Methods and Systems for Improved Coke Quenching.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/730,598, filed Dec. 28, 2012, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,238,778, titled Systems and Methods for Improving Quenched Coke Recovery.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/952,267, filed Nov. 25, 2015, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,862,888, titled Systems and Methods for Improving Quenched Coke Recovery.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/830,320, filed Dec. 4, 2017, now U.S. Pat. No. 10,323,192, titled Systems and Methods for Improving Quenched Coke Recovery.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/730,735, filed Dec. 28, 2012, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,273,249, titled Systems and Methods for Controlling Air Distribution in a Coke Oven.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/655,013, filed Jun. 23, 2015, now U.S. Pat. No. 11,142,699, titled Vent Stack Lids and Associated Systems and Methods.
U.S. Appl. No. 17/471,491, filed Sep. 10, 2021, now U.S. Pat. No. 11,142,699, titled Vent Stack Lids and Associated Systems and Methods.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/843,166, filed Mar. 15, 2013, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,273,250, titled Methods and Systems for Improved Quench Tower Design.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/014,547, filed Feb. 3, 2016, now, U.S. Pat. No. 10,927,303, titled Methods for Improved Quench Tower Design.
U.S. Appl. No. 17/155,818, filed Jan. 22, 2021, now U.S. Pat. No. 11,746,296, titled Methods and Systems for Improved Quench Tower Design.
U.S. Appl. No. 18/363,508, filed Aug. 1, 2023, titled Methods and Systems for Improved Quench Tower Design.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/655,003, filed Jun. 23, 2015, now U.S. Pat. No. 10,760,002, titled Systems and Methods for Maintaining a Hot Car in a Coke Plant.
U.S. Appl. No. 16/897,957, filed Jun. 10, 2020, now U.S. Pat. No. 11,359,145, titled Systems and Methods for Maintaining a Hot Car in a Coke Plant.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/829,588, filed Mar. 14, 2013, now U.S. Pat. No. 9, 193,915, titled Horizontal Heat Recovery Coke Ovens Having Monolith Crowns.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/322,176, filed Dec. 27, 2016, now U.S. Pat. No. 10,526,541, titled Horizontal Heat Recovery Coke Ovens Having Monolith Crowns.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/511,036, filed Mar. 14, 2017, now U.S. Pat. No. 10,968,383, titled Coke Ovens Having Monolith Component Construction.
U.S. Appl. No. 17/190,720, filed Mar. 3, 2021, titled Coke Ovens Having Monolith Component Construction.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/589,009, filed Aug. 17, 2012, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,359,554, titled Automatic Draft Control System for Coke Plants.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/139,568, filed Apr. 27, 2016, now U.S. Pat. No. 10,947,455, titled Automatic Draft Control System for Coke Plants.
U.S. Appl. No. 17/176,391, now U.S. Pat. No. 11,692,138, filed Feb. 16, 2021, titled Automatic Draft Control System for Coke Plants.
U.S. Appl. No. 18/321,530, filed May 22, 2023, titled Automatic Draft Control System for Coke Plants.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/588,996, filed Aug. 17, 2012, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,243,186, titled Coke Plant Including Exhaust Gas Sharing.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/959,450, filed Dec. 4, 2015, now U.S. Pat. No. 10,041,002, titled Coke Plant Including Exhaust Gas Sharing.
U.S. Appl. No. 16/047,198, filed Jul. 27, 2018, now U.S. Pat. No. 10,611,965, titled Coke Plant Including Exhaust Gas Sharing.
U.S. Appl. No. 16/828,448, filed Mar. 24, 2020, now U.S. Pat. No. 11,441,077, titled Coke Plant Including Exhaust Gas Sharing.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/589,004, filed Aug. 17, 2012, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,249,357, titled Method and Apparatus for Volatile Matter Sharing in Stamp-Charged Coke Ovens.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/730,673, filed Dec. 28, 2012, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,476,547, titled Exhaust Flow Modifier, Duct Intersection Incorporating G the Same, and Methods Therefor.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/281,891, filed Sep. 30, 2016, now U.S. Pat. No. 10,975,309, titled Exhaust Flow Modifier, Duck Intersection Incorporating the Same, and Methods Therefor.
U.S. Appl. No. 17/191,119, filed March 3, 3021, titled Exhaust Flow Modifier, Duck Intersection Incorporating The Same, and Methods Therefor.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/598,394, filed Aug. 29, 2012, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,169,439, titled Method and Apparatus for Testing Coal Coking Properties.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/865,581, filed Sep. 25, 2015, now U.S. Pat. No. 10,053,627, titled Method and Apparatus for Testing Coal Coking Properties, now U.S. Pat. No. 10,053,627.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/839,384, filed Aug. 28, 2015, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,580,656, titled Coke Oven Charging System.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/443,246, filed Feb. 27, 2017, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,976,089, titled Coke Oven Charging System.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/587,670, filed Dec. 31, 2014, now U.S. Pat. No. 10,619,101, titled Methods for Decarbonizing Coking Ovens, and Associated Systems and Devices.
U.S. Appl. No. 16/845,530, filed Apr. 10, 2020, now U.S. Pat. No. 11,359,146, titled Methods for Decarbonizing Coking Ovens, and Associated Systems and Devices.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/984,489, filed Dec. 30, 2015, now U.S. Pat. No. 10,975,310, titled Multi-Modal Beds of Coking Material.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/983,837, filed Dec. 30, 2015, now U.S. Pat. No. 10,968,395, titled Multi-Modal Beds of Coking Material.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/986,281, filed Dec. 31, 2015, now U.S. Pat. No. 10,975,311, titled Multi-Modal Beds of Coking Material.
U.S. Appl. No. 17/222,886, filed Apr. 12, 2021, titled Multi-Modal Beds of Coking Material.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/987,625, filed Jan. 4, 2016, now U.S. Pat. No. 11,060,032, titled Integrated Coke Plant Automation and Optimization Using Advanced Control and Optimization Techniques.
U.S. Appl. No. 17/172,476, filed Feb. 10, 2021, titled Integrated Coke Plant Automation and Optimization Using Advanced Control and Optimization Techniques.
U.S. Appl. No. 18/473,143, filed Sep. 22, 2023, titled Integrated Coke Plant Automation and Optimization Using Advanced Control and Optimization Techniques.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/839,493, filed Aug. 28, 2015, now U.S. Pat. No. 10,233,392, titled Method and System for Optimizing Coke Plant Operation and Output.
U.S. Appl. No. 16/251,352, filed Jan. 18, 2019, now U.S. Pat. No. 11,053,444, titled Method and System for Optimizing Coke Plant Operation and Output.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/839,551, filed Aug. 28, 2015, now U.S. Pat. No. 10,308,876, titled Burn Profiles for Coke Operations.
U.S. Appl. No. 16/428,014, filed May 31, 2019, now U.S. Pat. No. 10,920,148, titled Improved Burn Profiles for Coke Operations.
U.S. Appl. No. 17/155,719, filed Jan. 22, 2021, now U.S. Pat. No. 11,441,078, titled Improved Burn Profiles for Coke Operations.
U.S. Appl. No. 14/839,588, filed Aug. 28, 2015, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,708,542, titled Method and System for Optimizing Coke Plant Operation and Output.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/392,942, filed Dec. 28, 2016, now U.S. Pat. No. 10,526,542, titled Method and System for Dynamically Charging a Coke Oven.
U.S. Appl. No. 16/735,103, filed Jan. 6, 2020, now U.S. Pat. No. 11,214,739, titled Method and System for Dynamically Charging a Coke Oven.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/614,525, filed Jun. 5, 2017, now U.S. Pat. No. 11,508,230, titled Methods and Systems for Automatically Generating a Remedial Action in an Industrial Facility.
U.S. Appl. No. 18/047,916, filed Oct. 19, 2022, titled Methods and Systems for Automatically Generating a Remedial Action in an Industrial Facility.
U.S. Appl. No. 15/987,860, filed May 23, 2018, now U.S. Pat. No. 10,851,306, titled System and Method for Repairing a Coke Oven.
U.S. Appl. No. 17/076,563, filed Oct. 21, 2020, now U.S. Pat. No. 11,186,778, titled System and Method for Repairing a Coke Oven.
U.S. Appl. No. 17/521,061, filed Nov. 8, 2021, titled System and Method for Repairing a Coke Oven.
U.S. Appl. No. 18/469,704, filed Sep. 19, 2023, titled System and Method for Repairing a Coke Oven.
U.S. Appl. No. 17/135,483, filed Dec. 28, 2020, titled Oven Health Optimization Systems and Methods.
U.S. Appl. No. 16/729,053, filed Dec. 27, 2019, now U.S. Pat. No. 11,760,937, titled Oven Uptakes.
U.S. Appl. No. 18/366,244, filed Aug. 7, 2023, titled Oven Uptakes.
U.S. Appl. No. 16/729,036, filed Dec. 27, 2019, now U.S. Pat. No. 11,365,355, titled Systems and Methods for Treating a Surface of a Coke Plant.
U.S. Appl. No. 17/747,708, filed May 18, 2022, titled Systems and Methods for Treating a Surface of a Coke Plant.
U.S. Appl. No. 16/729,201, filed Dec. 27, 2019, titled Gaseous Tracer Leak Detection.
U.S. Appl. No. 16/729,122, filed Dec. 27, 2019, now U.S. Pat. No. 11,395,989, titled Methods and Systems for Providing Corrosion Resistant Surfaces in Contaminant Treatment Systems.
U.S. Appl. No. 17/843,164, filed Jun. 17, 2022, titled Methods and Systems for Providing Corrosion Resistant Surfaces in Contaminant Treatment Systems.
U.S. Appl. No. 16/729,068, filed Dec. 27, 2019, now U.S. Pat. No. 11,486,572, titled Systems and Methods for Utilizing Flue Gas.
U.S. Appl. No. 17/947,520, filed Sep. 19, 2022, titled Systems and Methods for Utilizing Flue Gas.
U.S. Appl. No. 16/729,129, filed Dec. 27, 2019, now U.S. Pat. No. 11,008,518, titled Coke Plant Tunnel Repair and Flexible Joints.
U.S. Appl. No. 17/320,343, filed May 14, 2021, now U.S. Pat. No. 11,597,881, titled Coke Plant Tunnel Repair and Flexible Joints.
U.S. Appl. No. 18/168, 142, filed Feb. 13, 2023, titled Coke Plant Tunnel Repair and Flexible Joints.
U.S. Appl. No. 16/729,170, now U.S. Pat. No. 11,193,069, filed Dec. 27, 2019, titled Coke Plant Tunnel Repair and Anchor Distribution.
U.S. Appl. No. 17/532,058, now U.S. Pat. No. 11,505,747, filed Nov. 22, 2021, titled Coke Plant Tunnel Repair and Anchor Distribution.
U.S. Appl. No. 17/967,615, filed Oct. 17, 2022, titled Coke Plant Tunnel Repair and Anchor Distribution.
U.S. Appl. No. 16/729,157, filed Dec. 27, 2019, now U.S. Pat. No. 11,071,935, titled Particulate Detection for Industrial Facilities, and Associated Systems and Methods.
U.S. Appl. No. 16/729,057, filed Dec. 27, 2019, now U.S. Pat. No. 11,021,655, titled Decarbonization of Coke Ovens and Associated Systems and Methods.
U.S. Appl. No. 17/321,857, filed May 17, 2021, now U.S. Pat. No. 11,643,602, titled Decarbonization of Coke Ovens and Associated Systems and Methods.
U.S. Appl. No. 18/313,622, filed May 8, 2023, titled Decarbonization of Coke Ovens and Associated Systems and Methods.
U.S. Appl. No. 16/729,212, filed Dec. 27, 2019, now U.S. Pat. No. 11,261,381, titled Heat Recovery Oven Foundation.
U.S. Appl. No. 17/584,672, filed Jan. 26, 2022, titled Heat Recovery Oven Foundation.
U.S. Appl. No. 16/729,219, now U.S. Pat. No. 11,098,252, filed on Dec. 27, 2019, titled Spring-Loaded Heat Recovery Oven System and Method.
U.S. Appl. No. 17/388,874, filed Jul. 29, 2021, now, U.S. Pat. No. 11,680,208, titled Spring-Loaded Heat Recovery Oven System and Method.
U.S. Appl. No. 18/313,647, filed May 8, 2023, titled Spring-Loaded Heat Recovery Oven System and Method.
U.S. Appl. No. 17/736,960, filed May 20, 2022, titled Foundry Coke Products, and Associated Systems and Methods.
U.S. Appl. No. 17/306,895, now U.S. Pat. No. 11,767,482, filed May 3, 2021, now U.S. Pat. No. 11,767,482, titled High-Quality Coke Products.
U.S. Appl. No. 18/363,465, filed Aug. 1, 2023, titled High-Quality Coke Products.
U.S. Appl. No. 18/466,549, filed Sep. 13, 2023, titled High-Quality Coke Products.
U.S. Appl. No. 18/052,760, filed Nov. 2, 2022, titled Foundry Coke Products, and Associated Systems, Devices, and Methods.
U.S. Appl. No. 09/680,187, filed on Oct. 5, 2000, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,290,494, titled Method and Apparatus for Coal Coking.
U.S. Appl. No. 17/155,818, filed Jan. 22, 2021, titled Methods and Systems for Improved Quench Tower Design.
U.S. Appl. No. 17/176,391, filed Feb. 16, 2021, titled Automatic Draft Control System for Coke Plants.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/730,673, filed Dec. 28, 2012, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,476,547, titled Exhaust Flow Modifier, Duct Intersection Incorporating the Same, and Methods Therefor.
U.S. Appl. No. 16/729,053, filed Dec. 27, 2019, titled Oven Uptakes.
U.S. Appl. No. 16/729,068, filed Dec. 27, 2019, titled Systems and Methods for Utilizing Flue Gas.
U.S. Appl. No. 17/320,343, filed May 14, 2021, titled Coke Plant Tunnel Repair and Flexible Joints.
U.S. Appl. No. 16/729, 157, filed on Dec. 27, 2019, now U.S. Pat. No. 11,071,935, titled Particulate Detection for Industrial Facilities, and Associated Systems and Methods.
U.S. Appl. No. 17/321,857, filed May 17, 2021, titled Decarbonization of Coke Ovens and Associated Systems and Methods.
U.S. Appl. No. 16/729,219, now U.S. Pat. No. 11,098,252, filed Dec. 27, 2019, titled Spring-Loaded Heat Recovery Oven System and Method.
U.S. Appl. No. 17/388,874, filed Jul. 29, 2021, titled Spring-Loaded Heat Recovery Oven System and Method.
U.S. Appl. No. 17/306,895, filed May 3, 2021, titled High-Quality Coke Products.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20230142380 A1 May 2023 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
63275891 Nov 2021 US