This invention relates generally to improvements in commercial printing systems and more particularly to a system for removing contaminants from and thereby extending the life of fountain solutions utilized in commercial printing plants.
A typical offset lithographic printing press has a plate cylinder upon which the negative of the text and illustrations to be printed are etched by a photographic and/or an electronic process. Dampening rollers apply a fountain solution to the plate cylinder which adheres to the plate cylinder except in the areas in which the text and illustrations are located.
Next, a series of form rollers, also known in the art as inking rollers, apply a layer of ink to the plate cylinder. The ink adheres to the plate cylinder only in the etched areas comprising the text and illustrations.
The plate cylinder then presses the inked text and illustrations onto a rubber blanket cylinder. An impression cylinder then presses a sheet of paper or other substrate to be printed against the blanket cylinder as the paper or other substrate passes between the blanket cylinder and the impression cylinder. The inked text and illustrations on the blanket cylinder are transferred onto the paper or other substrate to effect printing thereof.
Over time, ink, paper fiber, spray powder, and other contaminants build up in the fountain solution. These contaminants negatively impact print quality. Additionally, as the fountain solution degrades water adjustments are required. Eventually the fountain solution becomes so contaminated that it needs to be replaced. The present invention comprises a system for minimizing fountain solution contamination thereby extending the useful life of the fountain solution by a substantial period of time.
The fountain solution recycling system of the present invention utilizes a unique multi-stage separation technology and a recirculation pump to clean and restore the fountain solution. Removal of contaminants is achieved by processing the solution through three separate treatment stages resulting in a reusable, stabilized fountain solution. Components of the fountain solution which are consumed due to carry-off by the printing substrate and evaporation are replaced in the conventional manner.
Use of the fountain solution recycling system of the present invention easily and reliably reduces costs and improves productivity in an aspect of the commercial printing business that has traditionally been neglected. Simply extending the life of the fountain solution typically adds 1–2 hours of productivity per week per printing press because changing the fountain solution and cleaning the system are no longer required.
Additionally, by extending the life of the fountain solution waste disposal costs associated with fountain solution replacement are dramatically reduced. In those instances in which spent fountain solution is drained, use of the present invention greatly reduces the copper, zinc, ink, glycols, phosphates and suspended solids going into the drain thereby lessening the impact on the environment.
A more complete understanding of the present invention may be had by reference to the following Detailed Description when taken in connection with the accompanying Drawings, wherein:
Referring now to the Drawings, and particularly to
From the sediment prefilter 16 the fountain solution is directed to a separation cartridge 22 through a line 24. The separation cartridge 22 comprises a housing which contains a diatomaceous earth filter and functions to remove sub-micron sized particles from the flowing fountain solution. Thus, having passed through the sediment prefilter 16 and the separation cartridge 22 the fountain solution is substantially free of particulate and colloidal contaminants.
From the separation cartridge 22 the fountain solution is directed to a post treatment cartridge 26 through a line 28. The post treatment cartridge 26 comprises a housing which contains a natural zeolite filter material which removes copper ions, zinc ions, and other ions from the flowing fountain solution thereby substantially removing metal ion contaminants from the fountain solution. After flowing through the post treatment cartridge 26 the fountain solution is returned to the dampener recirculating device of the commercial pressing press through a line 30.
The sediment prefilter 16, the separation filter 22, and the post treatment filter 26 comprise a three stage treatment system in which each stage has a symbiotic relationship with the former stage. The use of the combined system comprising the prefilter 16, the separation filter 22, and the post treatment filter 26 affords two highly beneficial results. First, the use of the combined system substantially extends the life of fountain solution flowing therethrough. Second, the combined system renders the fountain solution much more environmentally friendly upon ultimately disposal.
The fountain solution recycling system 10 of the present invention withdraws fountain solution from the tank 36 through the line 14 and returns the fountain solution to the tank 34 through the line 30. Thus, the system 10 of the present invention functions to maintain the fountain solution within the tank 36 in a substantially clean condition characterized both by a lack of particulate contamination and a reduction of metal ion contamination.
As is best known in
A typical eight-color 40″ printing press requires the disposal of about 40 gallons of fountain solution per week, or about 2100 gallons per year. 2100 gallons equals about 40 barrels of spent fountain solution that must be disposed of annually. At a typical disposal cost of about $250/barrel the annual fountain solution disposal cost is about $10,000 per year per printing press. Conversely, when the present invention is used the annual fountain solution disposal requirement is about 2 barrels or about $500 per year per press. Elimination of press downtime for fountain solution change out is another benefit resulting from the use of the present invention. At just one hour of eliminated downtime per week the use of the present invention saves over $15,000 per year per press. When down time savings are combined with disposal cost savings use of the present invention results in about $25,000 in annual savings per press.
Although preferred embodiments of the invention have been illustrated in the accompanying Drawings and described in the foregoing Detailed Description, it will be understood that the invention is not limited to the embodiments disclosed, but is capable of numerous rearrangements, modifications, and substitutions of parts and elements without departing from the spirit of the invention.
This application is a continuation application of application Ser. No. 10/910,862 filed Aug. 4, 2004, currently pending, which is a divisional application of application Ser. No. 10/392,215 filed Mar. 19, 2003, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,908,558.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
181597 | Robertson | Aug 1876 | A |
2389730 | Iler | Nov 1945 | A |
3896730 | Garrett et al. | Jul 1975 | A |
3949668 | Smith, Jr. | Apr 1976 | A |
3959129 | White et al. | May 1976 | A |
4009657 | Bonanno et al. | Mar 1977 | A |
4179019 | Danziger | Dec 1979 | A |
4384523 | Ryan | May 1983 | A |
4391638 | Fusco et al. | Jul 1983 | A |
4565638 | Zucker | Jan 1986 | A |
4574695 | Ryan | Mar 1986 | A |
4608158 | Ghisalberti et al. | Aug 1986 | A |
4738785 | Langston et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
4754779 | Juhasz | Jul 1988 | A |
4778604 | Leonard et al. | Oct 1988 | A |
4818284 | McKelvey | Apr 1989 | A |
4874515 | McKelvey | Oct 1989 | A |
5017291 | Semler et al. | May 1991 | A |
5124736 | Yamamoto et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5177975 | Mertens | Jan 1993 | A |
5181467 | Takekoshi | Jan 1993 | A |
5200094 | Hill et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5201943 | Monnerat | Apr 1993 | A |
5344573 | Hill et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5415091 | Junghans | May 1995 | A |
5489379 | Meenan et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5505863 | Danon et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5622620 | Meenan et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5628914 | Prasil | May 1997 | A |
5702603 | Johnson et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5734944 | Seeley et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5811224 | Seeley et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5828923 | Harabin et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
6126336 | Ferrante | Oct 2000 | A |
6153107 | Ogawa et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6224273 | Ferrante | May 2001 | B1 |
6247856 | Shibano et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6293198 | Mizuno | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6488754 | McPherson et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6908558 | Stinson et al. | Jun 2005 | B1 |
20040182796 | Stinson et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20050006294 | Stinson et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050242019 | Stinson et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050252860 | Stinson et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050279691 | Stinson et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050284804 | Stinson et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2001260310 | Sep 2001 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050279691 A1 | Dec 2005 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10392215 | Mar 2003 | US |
Child | 10910862 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10910862 | Aug 2004 | US |
Child | 11198430 | US |