Foveated retinal prosthesis

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 9370417
  • Patent Number
    9,370,417
  • Date Filed
    Thursday, March 14, 2013
    11 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, June 21, 2016
    8 years ago
Abstract
Apparatus is provided having an intraocular device for implantation entirely in a subject's eye, the intraocular device including: a photosensor array having a plurality of photosensors, each photosensor detects ambient photons and generates a signal in response thereto. A spatial density of the photosensors in a central portion of the array is greater than a spatial density of the photosensors in an outer portion of the array. The intraocular device additionally includes a plurality of stimulating electrodes and driving circuitry coupled to the photosensors, and configured to drive the electrodes to apply electrical pulses to a retina of the eye in response to the signals from the photosensors. Other applications are also described.
Description
FIELD OF THE APPLICATION

Applications of the present invention relate generally to implantable medical devices, and specifically to a retinal prosthesis.


BACKGROUND OF THE APPLICATION

Retinal malfunction, due to degenerative retinal diseases, is a leading cause of blindness and visual impairment. Implantation of a retinal prosthesis is a technology for restoring some useful vision in individuals suffering from retinal-related blindness.


The retina is a multi-layered light-sensitive structure that lines the posterior, inner part of the eye. The retina contains photoreceptor cells, for example rods and cones, which capture light and convert light signals into neural signals transmitted through the optic nerve to the brain. Rods are responsible for light sensitive, low resolution black and white vision, whereas cones are responsible for sharp, high resolution color vision. Most cones lie in the fovea, which defines the center of the retina, and which allows for maximum acuity of vision. The central portion of the fovea consists of a high concentration of cones that gradually decreases at the peripheral portions of the fovea.


SUMMARY OF APPLICATIONS

For some applications, a foveated retinal prosthesis is provided comprising a space-variant photosensor imager. The retinal prosthesis is typically configured to provide at least some sharp, central, foveal vision to a visually-impaired subject. In accordance with some applications of the present invention, an intraocular device is provided which is configured to be implanted entirely in the subject's eye. The intraocular device typically comprises a space-variant photosensor array which comprises a plurality of photosensors, each photosensor configured to detect ambient photons and generate a signal in response thereto. The intraocular device additionally comprises a plurality of stimulating electrodes. Driving circuitry is coupled to the photosensors and is configured to drive the electrodes to apply electrical pulses to a retina of the eye in response to the signal from the photosensors.


Typically, the photosensor array is arranged such that a spatial density of the photosensors in a central portion of the array is greater than a spatial density of the photosensors in an outer portion of the array, resembling the structure of a native fovea of a retina. Additionally, for some applications, an intermediate portion of the photosensor array is disposed between the central portion and the outer portion of the array. Typically, a spatial density of the photosensors in the intermediate portion is between (a) the spatial density of the photosensors in the central portion and (b) the spatial density of the photosensors in the outer portion.


For some applications, the intermediate portion of the photosensor array comprises a plurality of intermediate portions, each having a different, respective spatial density of the photosensors. Thus, a stepped decrease or a smooth decrease in photosensor spatial density may be provided in alternative configurations.


For some applications the photosensor array comprises an array of at least 10 clusters of two or more photosensors. The clusters typically comprise 4-64 photosensors. For such applications, the spatial density of the photosensors in a cluster disposed in the central portion of the array is greater than the spatial density of the photosensors in a cluster disposed in the outer portion of the array.


For some applications, the plurality of stimulating electrodes are arranged in an array in a manner in which a spatial density of the electrodes in the array is constant (optionally, excluding that portion of the array which is over the foveola). For other applications, the spatial density of the electrodes in the central portion of the electrode array (optionally, excluding a portion that is over the foveola) is greater than the spatial density of the electrodes in the outer portion of the electrode array, e.g., to reduce any perceived spatial distortion of the image, whereby the inner portion of the image would appear magnified due to the foveation of the photosensor array.


There is therefore provided, in accordance with some applications of the present invention, apparatus, including an intraocular device configured to be implanted entirely in a subject's eye, the intraocular device including:


a photosensor array including a plurality of photosensors, each photosensor configured to detect ambient photons and to generate a signal in response thereto, a spatial density of the photosensors in a central portion of the array being greater than a spatial density of the photosensors in an outer portion of the array;


a plurality of stimulating electrodes; and


driving circuitry, coupled to the photosensors, and configured to drive the electrodes to apply electrical pulses to a retina of the eye in response to the signals from the photosensors.


For some applications, a spatial density of the photosensors in an intermediate portion of the array disposed between the central portion and the outer portion is between (a) the spatial density of the photosensors in the central portion and (b) the spatial density of the photosensors in the outer portion.


For some applications, the intermediate portion of the array includes a plurality of intermediate portions, each having a different, respective spatial density of the photosensors, any given intermediate portion that is closer to the central portion having a spatial density higher than that of any intermediate portion that is farther than the given intermediate portion from the central portion.


For some applications, the photosensor array includes at least two clusters of four or more photosensors, the photosensors in each cluster having a respective generally-uniform spatial density, the spatial density of the photosensors in one of the clusters that is disposed nearer the central portion of the array is greater than the spatial density of the photosensors in one of the clusters that is disposed nearer the outer portion of the array.


For some applications, the at least two clusters of four or more photosensors include at least ten clusters of four or more photosensors.


For some applications, the plurality of stimulating electrodes are arranged in an array, a spatial density of the electrodes being constant.


For some applications, the plurality of stimulating electrodes are arranged in an electrode array, a spatial density of the electrodes in a central portion of the electrode array being greater than a spatial density of the electrodes in an outer portion of the electrode array.


There is additionally provided, in accordance with some applications of the present invention, apparatus including an intraocular device configured to be implanted entirely in a subject's eye, the intraocular device including:


a photosensor array including a plurality of photosensors, each photosensor configured to detect ambient photons and to generate a signal in response thereto,


an optical magnifying element coupled to the photosensor array and configured to provide a magnified image on some but less than all of the photosensors of the photosensor array;


a plurality of stimulating electrodes; and


driving circuitry, coupled to the photosensors, and configured to drive the electrodes to apply electrical pulses to a retina of the eye in response to the signals from the photosensors.


There is further provided, in accordance with some applications of the present invention, apparatus including an intraocular device configured to be implanted entirely in a subject's eye, the intraocular device including:


a photosensor array including a plurality of photosensors, each photosensor configured to detect ambient photons and to generate a signal in response thereto;


an arrangement of stimulating electrodes, a spatial density of the electrodes in a central portion of the arrangement being lower than a spatial density of the electrodes in an outer portion of the arrangement, the arrangement being such that: (a) the outer portion surrounds the central portion, and (b) the central portion is large enough to contain therewithin a circle of diameter at least 100 um; and


driving circuitry, coupled to the photosensors, and configured to drive the electrodes to apply electrical pulses to a retina of the eye in response to the signals from the photosensors.


For some applications, the spatial density of the electrodes in the central portion is zero, and the spatial density of the electrodes in the outer portion is at least 4 electrodes per mm^2.


For some applications, the outer portion of the arrangement includes at least first and second sub-portions, the second sub-portion surrounding the first sub-portion, a spatial density of the electrodes in the second sub-portion of the arrangement being lower than a spatial density of the electrodes in the first sub-portion.


For some applications, the central portion is large enough to contain therewithin a circle of diameter of 100 um.


There is also provided, in accordance with some applications of the present invention, apparatus, including:


an intraocular device configured to be implanted entirely in a subject's eye, the intraocular device including:


a photosensor array, having a center thereof, and including a plurality of photosensors, each photosensor configured to detect ambient photons and to generate a signal in response thereto;


an array of stimulating electrodes, having a center thereof, and coupled to the photosensor array; and


driving circuitry, coupled to the photosensors, and configured to drive an electrode located at a first distance from the center of the electrode array to apply electrical pulses to a retina of the eye in response to a signal from a photosensor located at a second distance from the center of the photosensor array, the first distance being greater than the second distance.


The present invention will be more fully understood from the following detailed description of embodiments thereof, taken together with the drawings, in which:





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 is a schematic illustration of a photosensor array for use in an implantable intraocular device, in accordance with some applications of the present invention;



FIGS. 2A-E are schematic illustration of alternative configurations of a photosensor array for use in the implantable intraocular device of FIG. 1, in accordance with respective applications of the present invention;



FIGS. 3A-B are schematic illustration of an array of stimulating electrodes implanted in an eye of the subject, for use with any of the photosensor arrays shown in FIGS. 1-2, in accordance with respective applications of the present invention;



FIGS. 4A-B are schematic illustration of an array of stimulating electrodes implantable in an eye of the subject, for use with any of the photosensor arrays shown in FIGS. 1-2, in accordance with respective applications of the present invention; and



FIGS. 5A-B are schematic illustrations of a bottom view of an array of stimulating electrodes implantable in an eye of the subject, for use with any of the photosensor arrays shown in FIGS. 1-2, in accordance with respective applications of the present invention.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF APPLICATIONS

Reference is made to FIG. 1, which is a schematic illustration of a photosensor array 22 configured for use as part of an implantable intraocular device 20, in accordance with some applications of the present invention. Photosensor array 22 comprises a plurality of photosensors 24, each photosensor 24 configured to detect ambient photons and to generate a signal in response thereto. Driving circuitry 32, coupled to photosensors 24, drives a plurality of stimulating electrodes 30 to apply electrical pulses to a retina of the eye in response to the signal from the photosensors.


As shown schematically in FIG. 1, photosensor array 22 is arranged such that a spatial density of photosensors 24 in a central portion 26 of array 22 is greater than a spatial density of photosensors 24 in an outer portion 28 of array 22. As shown, a distance D1 between two photosensors 24 disposed in central portion 26 is smaller than a distance D4 between two photosensors 24 disposed in outer portion 28. For example, D1 is typically greater than 2 um and/or less than 100 um, e.g., greater than 4 um and/or less than 50 um. D4 is typically greater than 40 um and/or less than 1000 um, e.g., greater than 100 um and/or less than 500 um (e.g., 300 um). D4 divided by D1 is typically at least 2 (e.g., at least 4) and/or less than 200.


For some applications, the spatial density of the photosensors in an intermediate portion 34 of the array disposed between central portion 26 and outer portion 28 is between (a) the spatial density of the photosensors in central portion 26 and (b) the spatial density of the photosensors in outer portion 28. For example, a distance D2 between photosensors in intermediate portion 34 is between D1 and D4.


Photosensor array 22 may similarly be arranged to have a plurality of intermediate portions 34 and 36, each having a different, respective spatial density of photosensors 24. In such an arrangement, any given intermediate portion 34 that is closer to central portion 26 has a spatial density higher than that of any intermediate portion 36 that is farther than given intermediate portion 34 from central portion 26. Photosensor array 22 may be arranged to have 2, 3, 4-6, 7-10, or more intermediate portions. (Two intermediate portions 34 and 36 are shown in FIG. 1.)



FIG. 2A is a schematic illustration of photosensor array 22, in which photosensors 24 are arranged in concentric rings, in accordance with some applications of the present invention. As shown in the figures of the present patent application, the rings of photosensors are square rings, although the scope of the present invention includes the use of concentric rectangular, circular, hexagonal, and elliptical rings, as well as concentric rings of other shapes. Examples of hexagonal and circular photosensor arrays are shown in FIGS. 2D-E (respectively).


Each ring of photosensors 24 shown in FIG. 2A has the photosensors thereof disposed with a given distance D13 separating adjacent photosensors in the same ring. Photosensor array 22 as shown in FIG. 2A is characterized in that the distance D13 between photosensors in a ring closer to central portion 26 is smaller than the distance D14 between photosensors in a ring farther from central portion 26. In the application shown in FIG. 2A, successive rings going from central portion 26 toward outer portion 28 have gradually increasing, and typically monotonically increasing, distances between photosensors in each successive ring.


Alternatively or additionally, the distance between successive rings increases (typically monotonically) from a smaller distance D11, nearer central portion 26, to a larger distance D12, farther from central portion 26.


As shown in FIG. 2A and other figures, for some applications the rings of photosensors 24 may surround a central core 54 of photosensors, which are not arranged as a ring. Central core 54 typically comprises 4-100 photosensors 24. For some applications, the photosensors in central core 54 are spaced from each other by a distance D15 of 4-30 um, and/or central core 54 itself has a length D16 of 16-300 um as its longest dimension. For some applications, D16 is greater than 300 um (e.g., as shown in FIG. 2C).


For some applications, the number of photosensors 24 in each successive ring is constant, even though the perimeter of the ring increases. Alternatively, the number of photosensors increases, but not as fast as the perimeter of the ring. Still further alternatively, the number of photosensors in each increases as fast as the perimeter of the ring (i.e., a ring having twice as many photosensors as a more central ring also has twice the perimeter of the more central ring), however the space between successive rings increases (e.g., from D11 to D12 as shown).


As appropriate based on the amount of photosensor foveation desired in a given design, the increase in ring spacing (e.g., D11 to D12) and/or the increase in intra-sensor spacing (e.g., D13 to D14) may follow, for example, an arithmetic progression (k, 2 k, 3 k . . . ) or a geometric progression (1, k, k^2, k^3 . . . ). Typically, arithmetic progression spacing produces gradual spatial distortion of the image, which generally allows for rapid cognitive adjustment of the subject to a new implant.



FIG. 2B is a schematic illustration of photosensor array 22, in which photosensors 24 are arranged in concentric rings, having geometric or another progression spacing, in accordance with another application of the present invention. Typically, in applications in which photosensors 24 are arranged in concentric rings having geometric progression spacing, array 22 is particularly space efficient. This is generally due to the high spatial density of photosensors 24 in the central portion of the array and a rapid decrease in spatial density of photosensors 24 in the outer portion of the array. The apparatus of FIG. 2B is generally similar to that of FIG. 2A, except for differences as noted herein.



FIG. 2C is a schematic illustration of photosensor array 22, in which photosensors 24 are arranged in clusters (e.g., 1, 1, 2, 2 . . . ), in accordance with another application of the present invention. Typically, photosensor array 22 comprises at least two clusters of four or more photosensors 24. The photosensors in each cluster typically have a respective generally-uniform spatial density, and the spatial density of the photosensors in a cluster 52 that is disposed nearer central portion 26 of the array is greater than the spatial density of the photosensors 24 in a cluster 50 that is disposed nearer outer portion 28 of array 22.


The clusters of photosensors 24 as shown in FIG. 2C are two-dimensional, thus creating array 22 not just with concentric rings of photosensors that have respective densities, but with two-dimensional regions of the array that have particular spatial densities.


Typically, arrangement of photosensors 24 in clusters creates an increased area with constant pixel spacing in central portion 26 of the array, resulting in reduced spatial distortion of the image.


Reference is made to FIGS. 1-2E. For some applications, a size of photosensors 24 is varied across array 22. For example, the size of photosensors 24 in central portion 26 of array 22 may be smaller than the size of photosensors 24 in outer portion of array 22. Variable-sized photosensors may be used in combination with a space-variant array or, alternatively, with an array having constant spacing of photosensors. Alternatively or additionally, the signals generated by multiple photosensors 24 in outer portion 28 of array 22 are used to regulate current delivered from a smaller number of electrodes, e.g., a single electrode (which may be useful in low-light conditions, for example).


Alternatively, for some applications, the array of photosensors is arranged to provide first and second portions, e.g., left and right portions, rather than central and outer portions. For such applications, the photosensor array is arranged such that a spatial density of the photosensors in the first portion of the array is greater than a spatial density of the photosensors in the second portion of the array (application not shown).


Reference is made to FIGS. 3A and 3B, which are schematic cross-sectional illustrations of intraocular device 20, comprising photosensor array 22 (e.g., as described hereinabove with reference to any of the figures) and an array 88 of stimulating electrodes 30 that are epiretinally implanted in the retina 72 of the subject, in accordance with some applications of the present invention.


Intraocular device 20 as shown in FIGS. 3A and 3B comprises an arrangement of stimulating electrodes 30, in which a spatial density of the electrodes in a central portion 80 of the arrangement is lower than a spatial density of the electrodes in an outer portion 82 of the arrangement. In this arrangement, outer portion 82 surrounds central portion 80.


Central portion 80 typically has a length (e.g., a diameter) D9 of 50-1000 um, e.g., 100-500 um, so as to generally cover foveola 90. In any case, central portion 80 is at least large enough to contain therewithin a circle of diameter D9 of 50-1000 um, e.g., a circle of diameter 100-500 um, e.g., a circle of diameter 100-300 um.


Central portion 80 is typically placed over the foveola 90 of the patient's retina, such that typically no electrodes, or only a small number of electrodes are placed in the foveola (e.g., within but near the edge of the circle having diameter D9). In any case, the spatial density of electrodes in central portion 80 that are placed in the foveola is lower than the spatial density of electrodes in outer portion 82 that are placed in retinal tissue outside of the fovea or parafovea outside of the foveola. For example, the spatial density of electrodes in central portion 80 that are placed in the foveola may be zero if, as shown in FIGS. 3A and 3B, central portion 80 has no electrodes. For some applications, the spatial density of the electrodes in the central portion is zero, and the spatial density of the electrodes in the outer portion is at least 4 electrodes per mm^2 (for example, at least 10 electrodes per mm^2, and/or less than 400 or less than 100 electrodes per mm^2).


Alternatively, central portion 80 comprises any number of electrodes (e.g., as shown in FIGS. 4A-B) and implantable intraocular device 20 is configured such that driving circuitry 32 does not drive stimulating currents into the electrodes that are located in central portion 80. For such applications, electrodes 30 in central portion 80 may function to anchor device 20 to the retina and not to drive stimulating currents into the retina.


Further alternatively, central portion 80 that is placed over foveola 90 does not comprise electrodes, but rather comprises an anchoring element, e.g., a metallic tack, configured to facilitate anchoring of device 20 to the retina of the subject.


The retina includes a number of identified layers, each having its own properties. These layers include the nerve fiber layer (NFL), ganglion cell layer (GCL), inner plexiform layer (IPL), inner nuclear layer (INL), outer plexiform layer (OPL), outer nuclear layer (ONL), external limiting membrane (ELM), photoreceptor inner segments (IS) and outer segments (OS), cone photoreceptor outer segment tips (COST), and retinal pigment epithelium/Bruch's membrane (RPE/BM). Electrodes 30 typically have a length D18 of at least 50 um and/or less than 500 um, in order to facilitation penetration of the retina. For some applications of the present invention it is intended for electrodes 30 to penetrate the retina and stimulate a layer that is largely not present in the foveola but which is relatively thick in the surrounding fovea and parafovea (e.g., the inner nuclear layer and/or the ganglion cell layer). For these applications, electrodes 30 are typically arranged to provide central portion 80 as described, so as not to provide stimulation intended to generate perception of an image on a part of the retina (the foveola) that does not have significant ganglionic processing.


Typically, as shown in FIG. 3A, stimulating electrodes 30 are arranged in an array, a spatial density of electrodes in outer portion 82 being constant (e.g., 100 um). For example, a distance D5 between adjacent electrodes is typically greater than 10 um and/or less than 500 um. For applications in which the array of electrodes 30 is arranged as a square or a rectangular array, a longest row or column of the array typically has a length D10 greater than 1 mm and/or less than 6.0 mm, e.g., 2-4 mm, so as to generally cover the parafovea. For other arrangements of the electrodes (e.g., concentric circles of electrodes as shown in the bottom view of electrode arrays in FIGS. 5A-B), such values for D10 represent a furthest distance between two electrodes in the array (e.g., a diameter of the circle).


For some applications, an optical magnifying element 70 comprising a single lens (as shown) or a plurality of lenses (e.g., as a telescope, configuration not shown) is coupled to photosensor array 22 and provides a magnified image on some but less than all of photosensors 24 of photosensor array 22. Typically, element 70 is disposed a distance D8 of at least 1 mm and/or less than 30 mm (e.g., less than 15 mm) from photosensor array 22. This arrangement provides magnification of the image being viewed, may be used in combination with, or in the absence of, a variation in spatial density of the photosensors as described hereinabove.


Reference is made to FIG. 3B. For some applications, outer portion 82 of the arrangement comprises at least first and second sub-portions 84 and 86, the second sub-portion surrounding the first sub-portion. The spatial density of the electrodes in second sub-portion 86 of the arrangement is lower than the spatial density of the electrodes in first sub-portion 84, e.g., in order to provide higher spatial stimulation resolution in portions of the retina having the ability to perform more ganglionic processing of incoming visual information. For example, electrodes 30 in sub-portion 84 may be separated by a distance D6 that is at least 10 um and/or less than 100 um, while electrodes 30 in sub-portion 86 may be separated by a distance D7 that is at least 300 um and/or less than 500 um.


Reference is made to FIGS. 4A-B, which are schematic illustrations of array 88, in accordance with respective applications of the present invention. For some applications, array 88 does not comprise a portion 80 that does not have electrodes as described hereinabove with reference to FIGS. 3A-B. As shown in FIG. 4A, stimulating electrodes 30 are arranged in array 88 such that a spatial density of electrodes across the array is constant (e.g., with an interelectrode spacing of 100 um). Alternatively, as shown in FIG. 4B, array 88 comprises a central portion 87 and an outer portion 89, and a spatial density of the electrodes in central portion 87 is greater than the spatial density of the electrodes in outer portion 89 of array 88.


Reference is made to FIGS. 5A-B, which are schematic illustration of bottom views of array 88 of stimulating electrodes 30 implantable in an eye of the subject, for use with any of the photosensor arrays shown in FIGS. 1-2, in accordance with respective applications of the present invention. As shown in FIGS. 5A-B, for some applications, arrays 88 comprises a central portion 80 which is typically at least large enough to contain therewithin a circle of diameter D9 of 50-1000 um, e.g., a circle of diameter 100-500 um, e.g., a circle of diameter 100-300 um.


Reference is made to FIGS. 1-5B. For some applications, photosensor array 22 and array 88 of electrodes 30 have a similar spatial distribution such that the location of each photosensor 24 on array 22 corresponds to a location of a single electrode 30 (e.g., each photosensor is located above a corresponding electrode). Typically in such applications, perceived spatial distortion of the image is reduced.


Alternatively, photosensor array 22 and array 88 of electrodes 30 have a different spatial distribution, such that some or all photosensors 24 and electrodes 30 do not have a one-to-one spatial correspondence (e.g., each photosensor is not located above each corresponding electrode). For some such applications, photosensor array 22 maps a signal that is sensed at the center of array 22 to cause stimulation at a radially displaced site on electrode array 88 (i.e., an electrode that is located farther from the center of array 88). For example, device 20 may be configured such that a signal received by photosensors 24 in central portion 26 of array 22 causes driving of an electrode located in outer portion 82 of array 88. Thereby, current is generally not applied to central portion 80 of array 88 (e.g., current is largely not applied to foveola 90). As additionally shown by way of example in FIG. 4A, an electrode located at a first distance D74 from a center of electrode array 88 is configured to apply electrical pulses to the retina in response to a signal from a photosensor in array 22 located at a second distance 76 from a center of photosensor array 22. As shown, first distance D74 is greater than second distance D76.


It is noted that electrodes 30 may be arranged in an array that is square, rectangular, circular, elliptical, or hexagonal, or in other shapes.


It will be appreciated by persons skilled in the art that the present invention is not limited to what has been particularly shown and described hereinabove. Rather, the scope of the present invention includes both combinations and subcombinations of the various features described hereinabove, as well as variations and modifications thereof that are not in the prior art, which would occur to persons skilled in the art upon reading the foregoing description.

Claims
  • 1. Apparatus comprising an intraocular device configured to be implanted entirely in a subject's eye, the intraocular device comprising: a photosensor array comprising a plurality of photosensors, each photosensor configured to detect ambient photons and to generate a signal in response thereto;an arrangement of stimulating electrodes, a spatial density of the electrodes in a central portion of the arrangement being lower than a spatial density of the electrodes in an outer portion of the arrangement, the arrangement being such that: (a) the outer portion surrounds the central portion, and (b) the central portion is large enough to contain therewithin a circle of diameter of at least 100 microns and has a diameter of less than 1000 microns; anddriving circuitry, coupled to the photosensors, and configured to drive the electrodes to apply electrical pulses to a retina of the eye in response to the signals from the photosensors.
  • 2. The apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the spatial density of the electrodes in the central portion is zero, and wherein the spatial density of the electrodes in the outer portion is at least 4 electrodes per mm^2.
  • 3. The apparatus according to claim 2, wherein the spatial density of the electrodes in the outer portion is between 10 and 100 electrodes per mm^2.
  • 4. The apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the outer portion of the arrangement comprises at least first and second sub-portions, the second sub-portion surrounding the first sub-portion, a spatial density of the electrodes in the second sub-portion of the arrangement being lower than a spatial density of the electrodes in the first sub-portion.
  • 5. The apparatus according to claim 4, wherein the electrodes in the first sub-portion are separated by a distance of 10-100 microns.
  • 6. The apparatus according to claim 4, wherein the electrodes in the second sub-portion are separated by a distance of 300-500 microns.
US Referenced Citations (331)
Number Name Date Kind
1662446 Wappler Mar 1928 A
2721316 Shaw Oct 1955 A
2760483 Tassicker Aug 1956 A
4197850 Schulman et al. Apr 1980 A
4262294 Hara et al. Apr 1981 A
4272910 Danz Jun 1981 A
4324252 Rossing et al. Apr 1982 A
4486861 Harmel Dec 1984 A
4551149 Sciarra Nov 1985 A
4601545 Kern Jul 1986 A
4628933 Michelson Dec 1986 A
4664117 Beck May 1987 A
4786818 Mead et al. Nov 1988 A
4837049 Byers et al. Jun 1989 A
4903702 Putz Feb 1990 A
4914738 Oda et al. Apr 1990 A
4969468 Byers et al. Nov 1990 A
5016633 Chow May 1991 A
5024223 Chow Jun 1991 A
5081378 Watanabe Jan 1992 A
5108427 Majercik et al. Apr 1992 A
5109844 de Juan, Jr. et al. May 1992 A
5133356 Bryan et al. Jul 1992 A
5147284 Fedorov et al. Sep 1992 A
5159927 Schmid Nov 1992 A
5215088 Normann et al. Jun 1993 A
5313642 Seigel May 1994 A
5314458 Najafi et al. May 1994 A
5397350 Chow et al. Mar 1995 A
5411540 Edell et al. May 1995 A
5476494 Edell et al. Dec 1995 A
5526423 Ohuchi et al. Jun 1996 A
5556423 Chow et al. Sep 1996 A
5575813 Edell et al. Nov 1996 A
5597381 Rizzo, III Jan 1997 A
5608204 Hofflinger et al. Mar 1997 A
5665954 Bard et al. Sep 1997 A
5674263 Yamamoto et al. Oct 1997 A
5735882 Rottenberg et al. Apr 1998 A
5769875 Peckham et al. Jun 1998 A
5800478 Chen et al. Sep 1998 A
5800533 Eggleston et al. Sep 1998 A
5800535 Howard, III Sep 1998 A
5835250 Kanesaka Nov 1998 A
5836996 Doorish Nov 1998 A
5837995 Chow et al. Nov 1998 A
5850514 Gonda et al. Dec 1998 A
5865839 Doorish Feb 1999 A
5873901 Wu et al. Feb 1999 A
5895415 Chow et al. Apr 1999 A
5935155 Humayun et al. Aug 1999 A
5944747 Greenberg et al. Aug 1999 A
5949064 Chow et al. Sep 1999 A
6020593 Chow et al. Feb 2000 A
6032062 Nisch Feb 2000 A
6035236 Jarding et al. Mar 2000 A
6043437 Schulman et al. Mar 2000 A
6069365 Chow et al. May 2000 A
6075251 Chow et al. Jun 2000 A
6201234 Chow et al. Mar 2001 B1
6230057 Chow et al. May 2001 B1
6259937 Schulman et al. Jul 2001 B1
6287372 Briand et al. Sep 2001 B1
6298270 Nisch et al. Oct 2001 B1
6324429 Shire et al. Nov 2001 B1
6347250 Nisch et al. Feb 2002 B1
6368349 Wyatt et al. Apr 2002 B1
6389317 Chow et al. May 2002 B1
6400989 Eckmiller Jun 2002 B1
6427087 Chow et al. Jul 2002 B1
6442431 Veraart et al. Aug 2002 B1
6450816 Gerber Sep 2002 B1
6458157 Suaning Oct 2002 B1
6472122 Schulman et al. Oct 2002 B1
6473365 Joh et al. Oct 2002 B2
6498043 Schulman et al. Dec 2002 B1
6507758 Greenberg et al. Jan 2003 B1
6533798 Greenberg et al. Mar 2003 B2
6574022 Chow et al. Jun 2003 B2
6611716 Chow et al. Aug 2003 B2
6647297 Scribner Nov 2003 B2
6658299 Dobelle Dec 2003 B1
6677225 Ellis et al. Jan 2004 B1
6678458 Ellis et al. Jan 2004 B2
6683645 Collins et al. Jan 2004 B1
6738672 Schulman et al. May 2004 B2
6755530 Loftus et al. Jun 2004 B1
6758823 Pasquale et al. Jul 2004 B2
6761724 Zrenner et al. Jul 2004 B1
6762116 Skidmore Jul 2004 B1
6770521 Visokay et al. Aug 2004 B2
6785303 Holzwarth et al. Aug 2004 B1
6792314 Byers et al. Sep 2004 B2
6804560 Nisch et al. Oct 2004 B2
6821154 Canfield et al. Nov 2004 B1
6844023 Schulman et al. Jan 2005 B2
6847847 Nisch et al. Jan 2005 B2
6888571 Koshizuka et al. May 2005 B1
6904239 Chow et al. Jun 2005 B2
6908470 Stieqlitz et al. Jun 2005 B2
6923669 Tsui et al. Aug 2005 B1
6935897 Canfield et al. Aug 2005 B2
6949763 Ovadia et al. Sep 2005 B2
6961619 Casey Nov 2005 B2
6970745 Scribner Nov 2005 B2
6974533 Zhou Dec 2005 B2
6976998 Rizzo et al. Dec 2005 B2
6990377 Gliner et al. Jan 2006 B2
7001608 Fishman et al. Feb 2006 B2
7003354 Chow et al. Feb 2006 B2
7006873 Chow et al. Feb 2006 B2
7025619 Tsui et al. Apr 2006 B2
7027874 Sawan et al. Apr 2006 B1
7031776 Chow et al. Apr 2006 B2
7035692 Maghribi et al. Apr 2006 B1
7037943 Peyman May 2006 B2
7047080 Palanker et al. May 2006 B2
7058455 Huie, Jr. et al. Jun 2006 B2
7071546 Fey et al. Jul 2006 B2
7079881 Schulman et al. Jul 2006 B2
7081630 Saini et al. Jul 2006 B2
7096568 Nilsen et al. Aug 2006 B1
7103416 Ok et al. Sep 2006 B2
7107097 Stern et al. Sep 2006 B2
7127286 Mech et al. Oct 2006 B2
7127301 Okandan et al. Oct 2006 B1
7130693 Montalbo Oct 2006 B1
7133724 Greenberg et al. Nov 2006 B2
7139612 Chow et al. Nov 2006 B2
7147865 Fishman et al. Dec 2006 B2
7149586 Greenberg et al. Dec 2006 B2
7158834 Paul, Jr. Jan 2007 B2
7158836 Suzuki Jan 2007 B2
7160672 Schulman et al. Jan 2007 B2
7162308 O'Brien et al. Jan 2007 B2
7177697 Eckmiller et al. Feb 2007 B2
7190051 Mech et al. Mar 2007 B2
7191010 Ohta et al. Mar 2007 B2
7224300 Dai et al. May 2007 B2
7224301 Dai et al. May 2007 B2
7235350 Schulman et al. Jun 2007 B2
7242597 Shodo Jul 2007 B2
7244027 Sumiya Jul 2007 B2
7248928 Yagi Jul 2007 B2
7251528 Harold Jul 2007 B2
7255871 Huie, Jr. et al. Aug 2007 B2
7257446 Greenberg et al. Aug 2007 B2
7263403 Greenberg et al. Aug 2007 B2
7271525 Byers et al. Sep 2007 B2
7272447 Stett et al. Sep 2007 B2
7291540 Mech et al. Nov 2007 B2
7295872 Kelly et al. Nov 2007 B2
7302598 Suzuki et al. Nov 2007 B2
7314474 Greenberg et al. Jan 2008 B1
7321796 Fink et al. Jan 2008 B2
7342427 Fensore et al. Mar 2008 B1
7377646 Suzuki May 2008 B2
7379000 Dal et al. May 2008 B2
7388288 Solzbacher et al. Jun 2008 B2
7400021 Wu et al. Jul 2008 B2
7447547 Palanker Nov 2008 B2
7447548 Eckmiller Nov 2008 B2
7480988 Ok et al. Jan 2009 B2
7481912 Stelzle et al. Jan 2009 B2
7482957 Dai et al. Jan 2009 B2
7483751 Greenberg et al. Jan 2009 B2
7493169 Greenberg et al. Feb 2009 B2
7499754 Greenberg et al. Mar 2009 B2
7539544 Greenberg et al. May 2009 B2
7555328 Schulman et al. Jun 2009 B2
7556621 Palanker et al. Jul 2009 B2
7565202 Greenberg et al. Jul 2009 B2
7565203 Greenberg et al. Jul 2009 B2
7571004 Roy et al. Aug 2009 B2
7571011 Zhou et al. Aug 2009 B2
7574263 Greenberg et al. Aug 2009 B2
7610098 McLean Oct 2009 B2
7622702 Wu et al. Nov 2009 B2
7630771 Cauller Dec 2009 B2
7631424 Greenberg et al. Dec 2009 B2
7638032 Zhou et al. Dec 2009 B2
7666523 Zhou Feb 2010 B2
7676274 Hung et al. Mar 2010 B2
7691252 Zhou et al. Apr 2010 B2
7706887 Tai et al. Apr 2010 B2
7706893 Hung et al. Apr 2010 B2
7709961 Greenberg et al. May 2010 B2
7725191 Greenberg et al. May 2010 B2
7734352 Greenberg et al. Jun 2010 B2
7738962 Greenberg et al. Jun 2010 B2
7749608 Laude et al. Jul 2010 B2
7750076 Laude et al. Jul 2010 B2
7751896 Graf et al. Jul 2010 B2
7765009 Greenberg et al. Jul 2010 B2
7766903 Blumenkranz et al. Aug 2010 B2
7776197 Zhou Aug 2010 B2
7831309 Humayun et al. Nov 2010 B1
7834767 Shodo Nov 2010 B2
7835798 Greenberg et al. Nov 2010 B2
7840273 Schmid Nov 2010 B2
7846285 Zhou et al. Dec 2010 B2
7853330 Bradley et al. Dec 2010 B2
7871707 Laude et al. Jan 2011 B2
7877866 Greenberg et al. Feb 2011 B1
7881799 Greenberg et al. Feb 2011 B2
7887681 Zhou Feb 2011 B2
7894909 Greenberg et al. Feb 2011 B2
7894911 Greenberg et al. Feb 2011 B2
7904148 Greenberg et al. Mar 2011 B2
7908011 McMahon et al. Mar 2011 B2
7912556 Greenberg et al. Mar 2011 B2
7914842 Greenberg et al. Mar 2011 B1
7937153 Zhou et al. May 2011 B2
7957811 Caspi et al. Jun 2011 B2
7962221 Greenberg et al. Jun 2011 B2
7979134 Chow et al. Jul 2011 B2
7983308 Johnston et al. Jul 2011 B1
7989080 Greenberg et al. Aug 2011 B2
8000804 Wessendorf et al. Aug 2011 B1
8010202 Shah et al. Aug 2011 B2
8010206 Dai et al. Aug 2011 B2
8014868 Greenberg et al. Sep 2011 B2
8014869 Greenberg et al. Sep 2011 B2
8014878 Greenberg et al. Sep 2011 B2
8024022 Schulman et al. Sep 2011 B2
8034229 Zhou et al. Oct 2011 B2
8046078 Greenberg et al. Oct 2011 B2
8060211 Greenberg et al. Nov 2011 B2
8060216 Greenberg et al. Nov 2011 B2
8068913 Greenberg et al. Nov 2011 B2
8078284 Greenberg et al. Dec 2011 B2
8090447 Tano et al. Jan 2012 B2
8090448 Greenberg et al. Jan 2012 B2
8103352 Fried et al. Jan 2012 B2
8121697 Greenberg et al. Feb 2012 B2
8131375 Greenberg et al. Mar 2012 B2
8131378 Greenberg et al. Mar 2012 B2
8145322 Yao et al. Mar 2012 B1
8150526 Gross et al. Apr 2012 B2
8150534 Greenberg et al. Apr 2012 B2
8160713 Greenberg et al. Apr 2012 B2
8165680 Greenberg et al. Apr 2012 B2
8170676 Greenberg et al. May 2012 B2
8170682 Greenberg et al. May 2012 B2
8180453 Greenberg et al. May 2012 B2
8180454 Greenberg et al. May 2012 B2
8180460 Nevsmith et al. May 2012 B2
8190267 Greenberg et al. May 2012 B2
8195266 Whalen, III et al. Jun 2012 B2
8197539 Nasiatka et al. Jun 2012 B2
8239034 Greenberg et al. Aug 2012 B2
8244362 Yonezawa Aug 2012 B2
8359083 Clark et al. Jan 2013 B2
8428740 Gefen et al. Apr 2013 B2
8567048 Singh et al. Oct 2013 B2
20010011844 Ernst et al. Aug 2001 A1
20020091421 Greenberg et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020173889 Odinak et al. Nov 2002 A1
20030023297 Byers et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030032946 Fishman et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030100823 Kipke et al. May 2003 A1
20030110508 Bridgelall Jun 2003 A1
20030132946 Gold Jul 2003 A1
20030181957 Greenberg et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030208248 Carter et al. Nov 2003 A1
20040054407 Tashiro et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040078064 Suzuki Apr 2004 A1
20040080026 Minamio et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040082981 Chow et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040088026 Chow et al. May 2004 A1
20040098067 Ohta et al. May 2004 A1
20040181265 Palanker et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040189940 Kutschbach et al. Sep 2004 A1
20050015120 Seibel et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050119605 Sohn Jun 2005 A1
20050146954 Win et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050168569 Igarashi et al. Aug 2005 A1
20060106432 Sawan et al. May 2006 A1
20060111757 Greenberg et al. May 2006 A9
20060184245 Graf et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060215049 Sandini et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060256989 Olsen et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060282128 Tai et al. Dec 2006 A1
20060287688 Yonezawa Dec 2006 A1
20070005116 Lo Jan 2007 A1
20070123766 Whalen et al. May 2007 A1
20070142877 McLean Jun 2007 A1
20070142878 Krulevitch et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070191909 Ameri et al. Aug 2007 A1
20080114230 Addis May 2008 A1
20080234791 Arle et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080262571 Greenberg et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080288036 Greenberg et al. Nov 2008 A1
20080288067 Flood Nov 2008 A1
20080294224 Greenberg et al. Nov 2008 A1
20090002034 Westendorp et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090005835 Greenberg et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090024182 Zhang et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090118805 Greenberg et al. May 2009 A1
20090192571 Stett et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090204207 Blum et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090204212 Greenberg et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090216295 Zrenner et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090228069 Dai et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090287275 Suaning et al. Nov 2009 A1
20090326623 Greenberg et al. Dec 2009 A1
20100087895 Zhou et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100174224 Sohn Jul 2010 A1
20100204754 Gross et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100249877 Naughton Sep 2010 A1
20100249878 McMahon et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100331682 Stein et al. Dec 2010 A1
20110054583 Litt et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110106229 Ortmann May 2011 A1
20110172736 Gefen et al. Jul 2011 A1
20110254661 Fawcett et al. Oct 2011 A1
20120035725 Gefen et al. Feb 2012 A1
20120035726 Gross et al. Feb 2012 A1
20120041514 Gross et al. Feb 2012 A1
20120194781 Agurok Aug 2012 A1
20120194871 Murata Aug 2012 A1
20120209350 Taylor et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120221103 Liran et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120259410 Gefen et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120268080 Jeon et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120269205 Haque et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120283800 Perryman et al. Nov 2012 A1
20130126713 Haas et al. May 2013 A1
20130322462 Poulsen Dec 2013 A1
20140031931 Liran et al. Jan 2014 A1
20140047713 Singh et al. Feb 2014 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (21)
Number Date Country
2235216 Apr 1997 CA
2650300 Oct 2004 CN
1875895 Dec 2006 CN
10315397 Oct 2004 DE
2000-350742 Dec 2000 JP
2003-528702 Sep 2003 JP
20077042569 Feb 2007 JP
WO0191854 Dec 2001 WO
WO03032946 Apr 2003 WO
WO2007006376 Jan 2007 WO
WO2007009539 Jan 2007 WO
WO 2007076347 May 2007 WO
WO2007095395 Aug 2007 WO
WO2010035173 Apr 2010 WO
WO2010089739 Aug 2010 WO
WO2011086545 Jul 2011 WO
WO 2011163262 Dec 2011 WO
2012017426 Feb 2012 WO
2012114327 Aug 2012 WO
WO 2012114327 Aug 2012 WO
WO2012153325 Nov 2012 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (74)
Entry
Official Action dated Oct. 22, 2013, which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's U.S. Appl. No. 13/148,461.
Extended European Search Report dated Nov. 19, 2013 which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's European Patent Application No. 11814197.7.
J.F. Rizzo, “Methods and Perceptual Thresholds for Short-Term Electrical Stimulation of Human Retina with Microelectrode Arrays”, Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, vol. 44, No. 12, (Dec. 1, 2003) pp. 5355-5361.
Normann et al., “High-resolution spatio-temporal mapping of visusal pathways using multi-electrode arrays,” Vision Research 41 (2001) 1261-1275.
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/437,310, dated Jan. 28, 2014.
Weber et al., “Implementations and implications of foveated vision”, Recent Patents on Computer Science 2009, 2 75-85.
Schmidhuber et al., “Learning to generate artificial fovea trajectories for target detection”, International Journal of Neural Systems, [1991] 2(1 & 2): 135-141.
Park et al., “A foveaed-structured CMOS retina chip for edge detection with local light adaptation”, Sensors and Actuators A 108 [2003] 75-80.
An Office Action dated Mar. 3, 2015, which issued during the prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 13/148,461.
An Office Action dated Feb. 5, 2015, which issued during the prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 14/199,462.
An Office Action dated Apr. 14, 2015, which issued during the prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 14/018,850.
An Office Action dated Feb. 3, 2014, which issued during the prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 13/683,158.
Partial International Search Report issued in PCT/IB2014/067417.
Partial International Search Report issued in PCT/IB2015/050224.
An EP Search Report dated Feb. 20, 2015 that issued in EP 12782462.1.
An International Search Report and Written Opinion, dated Feb. 27, 2014, which issued in the Applicant's PCT Application No. PCT/IB2013/060270.
Examination Report, dated Apr. 16, 2014, which issued in the Applicant's EP Application No. 11732733.8.
Official Action, dated Nov. 27, 2013, which issued in the Applicant's JP Application No. 2011-548843.
Examination Report, dated Feb. 26, 2014, which issued in the Applicant's EP Application No. 10738277.2.
Partial International Search Report, dated Jun. 16, 2014, which issued in the Applicant's PCT Application No. PCT/IB2014/059672.
International Search Report and Written Opinion, dated Nov. 11, 2014, which issued in the Applicant's PCT Application No. PCT/IB2014/059672.
Delbruck et al.: “Analog VLSI Adaptive, Logarithmic, Wide-Dynamic-Range Photoreceptor,” 1994 International Symposium on Circuits and Systems (London, 1994), p. 339-342.
Grill W., at al., Implanted Neural Interfaces: Biochallenges and Engineered Solutions, Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 2009, 11:1.
Jourdain R P., at al., “Fabrication of piezoelectric thick-film bimorph micro-actuators from bulk ceramics using batch-scale methods” Multi-Material Micro Manufacture, S. Dimov and W. Menz (Eds.) 2008 Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK., Whittles Publishing Ltd.
Kim B., “Through-Silicon-via Copper Deposition for Vertical Chip Integration” Master. Res, Soc. Symp. Proc. vol. 970, 2007 Material Research Society.
Lianga C, at al., “Surface modification of cp-Ti using femtosecond laser micromachining and the deposition of Ca/P layer” Materials Letters vol. 62, Issue 23, Aug. 31, 2008, pp. 3783-3786—an abstract.
David C Ng, et al., “Pulse frequency modulation based CMOS image sensor for subretinal stimulation” IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems—II: Express Briefs, vol. 53, No. 6, Jun. 2006.
News Release—Sony develops back-illuminated CMOS image sensor, realizing high picture quality, nearly twofold sensitivity (*1) and low noise, Jun. 2008 http://www.sony.net/SonyInfo/News/Press/200806/08-069E/index.html.
Puech M., et al., “Fabrication of 3D packaging TSV using DRIE” Alcatel Micro Machining Systems, vvww.adixen.com, Mar. 2007.
Seo J M., et al., “Biocompatibility of polyimide microelectrode array for retinal stimulation,” Materials Science and Engineering: C, vol. 24, No. 1, Jan. 5, 2004, pp. 185-189(5).
Sorkin R., et al., “Process entanglement as a neuronal anchorage mechanism to rough surfaces,” Nanotechnology 20 (2009) 015101 (8pp).
Starzyk JA, et al., “A DC-DC charge pump design based on voltage doublers” IEEE Transaction on Circuits and Systems—I: Fundamental theory and applications, vol. 48, No. 3 Mar. 2001.
Stein DJ, et al., “High voltage with Si series photovoltaics” Proceedings of SPE, the International Society for Optical Engineering 2006, vol. 6287, pp. 62870D.1-62870D, (an abstract).
Swain P K., et al., “Back-Illuminated Image Sensors Come to the Forefront. Novel materials and fabrication methods increase quality and lower cost of sensors for machine vision and industrial imaging.” Photonics Spectra Aug. 2008.
Vorobyeva A Y. at al., “Metallic light absorbers produced by femtosecond laser pulses,” Advances in Mechanical Engineering vol. 2010, Article ID 452749, 4 pages doi:10.1155/2010/452749, Hindawi Publishing Corporation.
Vorobyeva A Y. et al., “Femtosecond laser structuring of titanium implants,” Applied Surface Science vol. 253, Issue 17, Jun. 30, 2007, pp. 7272-7280—an abstract.
Wallman L., et al., “The geometric design of micromachined silicon sieve electrodes influences functional nerve regeneration,” Biomaterials May 2001:22(10):1 187-93, (an abstract).
Walter P., et al., “Cortical Activation via an implanted wireless retinal prosthesis,” Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science. 2005;46:1780-1785.
Wu J T. and Chang K L., “MOS charge pumps for low-voltage operation” IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 33 No. 4 Apr. 1998.
Zrenner E., 2002. “Will retinal implants restore vision?” Science 295(5557), pp. 1022-1025.
Office Action dated Aug. 24, 2011 issued during the prosecution of related U.S. Appl. No. 12/368,150.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability and Written Opinion dated Aug. 9, 2011, issued in related International Application No. PCT/IL2010/000097.
International Search Report dated Aug. 17, 2010, issued in related International Application No. PCT/IL2010/000097.
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Aug. 12, 2011, issued in related International Application No. PCT/IL2011/000022.
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Dec. 12, 2011 issued in related International Application No. PCT/IL2011/00609.
An Office Action dated Aug. 28, 2012, which issued during the prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 12/852,218.
An Office Action dated Sep. 28, 2012, which issued during the prosecution of U.S. Appl. No. 13/103,264.
An International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Jul. 17, 2012, which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's PCT/IL2011/000022.
A Supplementary European Search Report dated Aug. 10, 2012, which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's European Application No. 10 73 8277.
Palanker D. et al., “Design of a high-resolution optoelectric retinal prosthesis”. Journal of Neural Engineering, Institute of physics publishing, Bristol, GB. vol. 2, No. 1, Mar. 1, 2005, pp. S105-S120, XP002427333, ISSN: 17412552, DOI: 10.1088/1741-2560/2/11012.
Cortical Visual Neuro-Prosthesis for the Blind: Retina-Like Software/Hardware Preprocessor, F.J. Pelayol, A. Martinezl, S. Romerol, Ch.A. Morillasl, E. Rosl , E. Fernandez2 1Dept. of Computer Architecture and Technology, University of Granada, Spain 2Dept. of Histology and Institute of Bioengineering, University Miguel Hernandez, Alicante, Spain Neural Engineering, 2003. Conference Proceedings. First International IEEE EMBS Conference.
“Single-Chip CMOS Image Sensors for a Retina Implant System”, Markus Schwarz, Ralf Hauschild, Bedrich J. Hosticka, Senior Member, IEEE, Jurgen Huppertz, Student Member, IEEE, Thorsten Kneip, Member, IEEE, Stephan Kolnsberg, Lutz Ewe, and Hoc Khiem Trieu, 2000.
An International Search Report dated Aug. 12, 2011, which issued during the prosecution of Applicant s PCT/IL2011/000022.
An International Search Report and a Written Opinion both dated Sep. 17, 2012, which issued during the prosecution of Applicant's PCT/IL12/00057.
Schwarz et al. “Hardware Architecture of a Neural Net Based Retina Implant for Patients Suffering from Retinitis Pigmentosa,” Fraunhofer Institute of Microelectronic Circuits and Systems, pp. 653-658 (1996).
Ganesan et al. “Diamond Penetrating Electrode Array for Epi-Retinal Prosthesis,” 32nd Annual International Conference of the IEEE EMBS, pp. 6757-6760 (2010).
Finn, et al. “An Amphibian Model for Developing and Evaluating Retinal Protheses,” 18th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, pp. 1540-1541 (1996).
Shawn Kelly, “A System for Electrical Retinal Stimulation for Human Trials,” Massachusetts Institute of Technology, pp. 1-45 (1998).
Andreou et al. “Analog Integrated Circuits and Signal Processing,” An International Journal, vol. 9, No. 2, pp. 141-166 (1996).
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/034,516 dated Dec. 14, 2012.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/687,509 dated Dec. 7, 2012.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/148,461 dated Mar. 13, 2013.
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/687,509 dated Jun. 6, 2013.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/IL2012/000186 dated Sep. 4, 2012.
Humayun et al. Visual perception in a blind subject with a chronic microelectronic retinal prosthesis, Vision Research, vol. 43, pp. 2573-2581 (2003).
Tran et al. “A Fully Flexible Stimulator using 65 nm CMOS Process for 1024-electrode Epi-retinal Prosthesis,” 31st Annual International Conference of the IEEE EMBS, pp. 1643-1646 (2009).
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/437,310, dated Aug. 12, 2013.
An interview summary in U.S. Appl. No. 13/437,310 dated Nov. 14, 2013 in connection with the Office Action issued on Aug. 12, 2013.
European Search Report for European Application No. EP11732733 dated Jul. 16, 2013.
Yoo et al. “Excimer laser deinsulation of Parylene-C on iridium for use in an activated iridium oxide film-coated Utah electrode array,” Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 215 (2013) 78-87.
Schmidhuber, J., “Learning to generate artificial fovia trajectories for target detection,” International Journal of Neurosystems; 2(1 & 2):135-141, (1991).
ISR and the Written Opinion issued on Jun. 30, 2015 in PCT/IB2014/067417.
The ISR and the Written Opinion issued on Jun. 30, 2015 in PCT/IB2015/050224.
The Office Action as issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/160,314 on Aug. 20, 2015.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20140277435 A1 Sep 2014 US