BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
For a more complete understanding of the present invention, and the advantages thereof, reference is now made to the following descriptions taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which:
FIG. 1A depicts a perspective view of one exemplary embodiment of a frac head in accordance with the present invention deployed above a conventional isolation tool.
FIG. 1B depicts another exemplary embodiment of a frac head in accordance with the present invention deployed above a conventional well head.
FIG. 2 depicts a cross-sectional view of the frac head shown on FIG. 1B.
FIGS. 3A, 3B, and 3C depict cross-sectional views of top, middle, and bottom portions of the exemplary frac head shown on FIG. 1B.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
Referring to FIGS. 1A through 3C, it will be understood that features or aspects of the embodiments illustrated may be shown from various views. Where such features or aspects are common to particular views, they are labeled using the same reference numeral. Thus, a feature or aspect labeled with a particular reference numeral on one view in FIGS. 1A through 3C may be described herein with respect to that reference numeral shown on other views.
Referring now to FIGS. 1A and 1B, exemplary embodiments of frac head apparatuses 100 and 100′ in accordance with the present invention are illustrated. Frac head 100 (FIG. 1A) is depicted in perspective view coupled to the upper portion of a conventional wellhead isolation tool 50 (also commonly referred to in the art as a “tree saver”), which may be deployed, for example, directly above a conventional wellhead (not shown on FIG. 1A). Frac head 100′ (FIG. 1B) is shown coupled directly to a wellhead 75 (also commonly referred to in the art as a “well tree” or a “Christmas tree”). Wellheads are known in the art to often include a series of valves (hence the reference to a well tree). The exemplary embodiment shown includes two valves. It will be understood that the invention is not limited in any way by the configuration of the well head. Nor is the invention limited in any way by the deployment configuration of the frac head above the wellhead.
Frac heads 100 and 100′ include main body portions 140 and 140′ (also referred to in the art as “goat heads”) having a plurality of side ports 142. The exemplary embodiments shown include three (FIG. 1A) and four (FIG. 1B) side ports 142, respectively, however the invention is not limited in this regard. Frac heads in accordance with this invention may include substantially any number of side ports. Frac heads 100 and 100′ may also optionally include a top port 122 as described in more detail below.
With reference now to FIGS. 2 and 3A through 3C, one exemplary embodiment of frac head 100′ is shown in longitudinal cross section (along section lines 2-2 shown on FIG. 1B). In the exemplary embodiment shown, frac head 100 includes three body sections; a first, upper body 120 (also referred to as an adapter flange) deployed atop a second, main body 140′, which is in turn deployed atop a third, lower body 160 (also referred to as a vortex body). Upper body 120 includes a flange 124 for mechanically coupling the upper body 120 to face 151 of goat head 140. Lower body 160 also includes a flange 162 for mechanically coupling the lower body 160 to lower face 153 of the goat head 140′. It will be understood that the invention is not limited to embodiments including multiple body portions (such as 120, 140′, and 160) as shown on FIG. 2. Nor is the invention limited to threaded couplings as shown on FIGS. 1 through 3C.
With continued reference to FIGS. 2 and 3A through 3C, the exemplary embodiment of frac head 100′ shown includes a top port 122 deployed atop frac head 100′ and a plurality of side ports 142 of conventional construction deployed about the periphery of the frac head 100′. Advantageous embodiments typically include from 2 to 4 side ports 142, although the invention is not limited in this regard. The side ports 142 are disposed to direct flow from each of the side ports 142 downward through inner bore 148, tapered vortex 168, and lower bore 164 (and ultimately into the well). Although the invention is not limited in this regard, side ports 142 and optional top port 122 typically include a conventional hammer union for coupling with high pressure fluid lines (e.g., from one or more pumping trucks).
Side ports 142 are preferably symmetrically arranged around main body 140 or 140′ (e.g., three side ports located at 120 degree intervals about main body 140 or four side ports located at 90 degree intervals about the main body 140′). Such an arrangement advantageously reduces lateral fluid flow and therefore tends to advantageously reduce frac head erosion. It is also preferable for side ports 142 to terminate at substantially the same longitudinal position in the frac head (e.g., the same vertical distance from vortex 168) such that lateral flow from one side port tends to counteract lateral flow from an opposite side port. In the exemplary embodiments shown, side ports 142 are at an angle of about 45 degrees with respect to longitudinal axis 110, although the invention is not limited in this regard. Side ports 142 are also shown welded to body portions 140 and 140′. The invention is, of course, not limited in this regard.
While the invention is not limited to embodiments having multiple body portions (such as 120, 140′, and 160 described above), such a construction provides certain advantages. One such advantage is a reduction in manufacturing complexity and cost. Another advantage is that damaged body portions may be replaced individually without requiring replacement of the entire frac head. The modular configuration of frac heads 100 and 100′ also endows functional advantages. For example, the modular configuration shown on FIGS. 2 through 3C allows an apparatus having a great number of side ports to be assembled. Such an apparatus may be advantageous, for example, in a fracturing operation requiring extremely high fluid pressures and/or volumes. An embodiment having 8 side ports has been assembled for one such operation. This exemplary frac head embodiment includes first and second main body portions 140′ stacked atop one another (with a connecting flange deployed therebetween). The dual body portions 140′ are then coupled to body portions 120 and 160 as described above and shown on FIG. 2.
Another functional advantage of the modular configuration is that conventional wireline and/or slick line tool assemblies may be mounted atop frac heads 100 and 100′. This obviates the need to remove the frac head from the well head prior to wireline and/or slick line operations and thereby saves valuable rig time. For example, in one exemplary embodiment, top port 122 may be configured to include a conventional Otis or Bowen connector. A conventional lubricator (not shown) may then be coupled to the top port. As is known to those of ordinary skill in the art, a typical slick line tool assembly includes a slick line routed through a conventional stuffing box, which is mounted atop the aforementioned lubricator. A typical wireline tool assembly includes a wireline routed through a conventional grease injection head, which is mounted atop a lubricator. In such operations, the slick line and/or wireline tool may be advantageously lowered down through frac head 100 or 100′ into the wellbore.
Frac head 100′ further includes a longitudinal through bore from top port 122 down through the lower end of the tool. The longitudinal through bore includes at least three sections, a first bore section 148 having an inner diameter ID1, which is located upstream of a second section, tapered section 168, which is in turn located upstream of a third bore section having an inner diameter ID2. Tapered section 168 has a reduced diameter at the downstream end thereof, reducing the inner diameter of the bore from ID1 at the upstream end of the tapered section 168 to ID2 at the downstream end of the tapered section 168 in the exemplary embodiment shown. First bore section 148 includes a mixing chamber 145 located at the lower end thereof, downstream of side port bores 144 and upstream of the tapered bore 168. As shown, mixing chamber 145 has a length d and an inner diameter ID1. The combination of the mixing chamber 145 and the tapered vortex 168 has been found to advantageously reduce erosion in frac head 100′. It is believed that the presence of mixing chamber 145 above vortex 168 serves to redirect fluid flow downhole with minimal turbulence and associated lateral fluid flow. Stated another way, the mixing chamber 145 and vortex 168 are believed to “straighten out” the fluid prior to its entry into the smaller diameter bore 164.
With continued reference to FIG. 2 and further reference to Table 1, it has been found that the size and shape of mixing chamber 145 relative to other frac head components plays a role in erosion reduction. Mixing chamber 145 may be advantageously sized and shaped to minimize erosion caused by lateral fluid flow from side ports 142. For example, the length d of the mixing chamber 145 from the downstream end of side bores 144 to the upstream end of vortex 168 is advantageously greater than the diameter ID1 of the mixing chamber. The ratio of the length d to the diameter ID1 is most preferably greater than 2. Moreover, the ratio of the diameter ID1 of the mixing chamber 145 is advantageously at least 1.5 times that of the inner diameters ID2 and ID3 of the lower bore section 164 and side bores 144, respectively. Vortex 168 advantageously has a taper in the range from about 2 to 3 inches of diameter reduction per foot of length (i.e., from about 4 to about 8 degrees). It will be understood that the invention is not necessarily limited by any of the preferred sizes and ratios disclosed in Table 1.
TABLE I
|
|
Preferred
Embodiment 1
Embodiment 2
Embodiment 3
|
|
|
ID1
—
7 1/16
in
5⅛
in
5⅛
in
|
ID2
—
4 1/16
in
3 1/16
in
2 9/16
in
|
Taper
2 to 3 in/ft
3
in/ft
2 1/16
in/ft
2 9/16
in/ft
|
D
—
8¾
in
12
in
12
in
|
ID1/ID2
>1.5
1.74
1.67
2.0
|
ID1/ID3
>1.5
1.57
1.55
1.55
|
d/ID1
>1.0
1.24
2.34
2.34
|
|
In the exemplary embodiment shown (FIG. 2), a portion of mixing chamber 145 is located in the downstream end of main body 140′. The remainder of the mixing chamber 145 is located in the upstream end of lower body 160 (above tapered vortex 168). While the invention is not limited in this regard, the disclosed construction is believed to be advantageous. It is believed that locating interface 155 (the interface between body portions 140′ and 160 as shown on FIG. 2) a certain distance above the vortex reduces or eliminates erosion at the interface 155. However, the invention is not limited in this regard. The mixing chamber 145 may be equivalently housed in its entirety in either the main body 140′ or the lower body 160. Moreover, as stated above, the invention is not limited to embodiments having multiple body portions. Suitable embodiments may also be of a unitary construction.
The exemplary embodiments shown on FIGS. 2 through 3C do not include any internal wear and/or erosion resistant coatings deployed on the internal surfaces of the frac heads 100, 100′. Such embodiments have been found to be suitable for typical well fracturing operations. However, the invention is not limited in this regard. It may be advantageous in selected embodiments (or for certain highly demanding applications) to employ an erosion resistant coating on certain (or all) of the internal surfaces of the frac head. For example, in one exemplary embodiment, frac heads in accordance with this invention may include a tungsten carbide, non-woven cloth based coating metallurgically bonded to selected internal surfaces, such as the vortex and mixing chamber. In one such embodiment, the tungsten carbide coating includes a Matrix3® coating available from Dyna-Drill® Technologies, Houston, Tex. Other embodiments may deploy wear-resistant coatings, such as tungsten carbide coatings deployed by other methods, such as spraying, welding, or painting, as is known in the art.
It will be appreciated that the top port 122 and/or the side ports 142 may optionally each include a wear resistant sleeve (or tube) deployed therein as is well known to those of ordinary skill in the art. Such sleeves, when utilized, are intended to minimize erosion in the top and/or side ports.
Although the present invention and its advantages have been described in detail, it should be understood that various changes, substitutions and alternations can be made herein without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims.