This disclosure relates to mixing and reactor equipment and methods of use. In particular, the disclosure relates to systems and methods for mixing and/or reacting one or more fluids.
Many fluid processes benefit from efficient mixing. Nearly all conventional art mixing equipment, such as blenders, impellers, static mixers, and impinging devices, scale and intermingle the fluids to be mixed while the fluids are in actual contact with one another. This approach can result in the creation of a variety of inhomogeneities within the body of the fluid mixture. Such inhomogeneities may be harmful to the process of mixing and/or the reactions occurring within the body of the fluid. For example, large scale concentration or temperature inhomogeneities may be produced within the body of the fluid mixture by the use of conventional mixing equipment.
Additionally, conventional mixing equipment generally relies upon forcing large scale turbulence upon the fluid mixture. Turbulence, in turn, may lead to the formation of eddies within the fluid body which, in many instances, may be as large as the reaction vessel itself. The presence of eddies within the fluid body may hamper the proper mixing of the fluid and further may disrupt the extent of the reactions occurring within the fluid.
Fractal reactors and mixers, such as those disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,742,924, exist. However, some circumstances require alteration to existing structures. Some of those circumstances include, but are not limited to, the following: when the smallest desired fractal scale can plug due to suspended solids, when the smallest desired fractal scale can lead to manufacturing problems, when the smallest desired fractal scale is too expensive to manufacture, and when the smallest desired fractal scale involves laminar flow.
Other drawbacks, inefficiencies, and issues also exist with current systems and methods.
Accordingly, disclosed systems and methods address the above, and other, drawbacks, inefficiencies, and issues of existing systems and methods.
Disclosed embodiments include, but are not limited to, fractal mixers/reactors where independent flows of mixing components are progressively scaled through smaller and smaller conduit. At the smallest fractal scale, specifically where the mixing components come into contact with one another, a passive mixing structure completes the mixing process.
Disclosed embodiments show improved mixing and maintain the beneficial characteristics of fractal mixers and reactors even for the special cases listed above.
Disclosed embodiments include systems for mixing at least two mixing components, the systems having a first mixing component independent fractal for transporting the first mixing component, a second mixing component independent fractal for transporting the second mixing component, wherein each of the first mixing component independent fractal and the second mixing component independent fractal comprise at least a first iteration of a fractal shape and a last iteration of the fractal shape, a contact channel in fluid communication with each of the last iterations for the first mixing component independent fractal and the second mixing component independent fractal, and a passive mixing structure located in at least a portion of the contact channel.
In some embodiments the first mixing component independent fractal is located in a first plane and the second mixing component independent fractal is located in a second plane.
In some embodiments the passive mixing structure further comprises a static mixing structure. In other embodiments the passive mixing structure further comprises a turbulent mixing structure. In still further embodiments the passive mixing structure further comprises a laminar mixing structure.
In some embodiments the last iteration of the fractal shape is the smallest scale fractal. In some embodiments each of the last iterations for the first mixing component independent fractal and the second mixing component independent fractal meet in the contact channel at an angle ranging from 0° to 180°.
In some embodiments, the number of mixing components may be more than two mixing components, and the mixing may be simultaneous mixing or sequential mixing of one component after another.
Also disclosed are methods for mixing at least two mixing components, the methods including transporting a first mixing component in a first mixing component independent fractal; for transporting the first mixing component, transporting a second mixing component in a second mixing component independent fractal, wherein each of the first mixing component independent fractal and the second mixing component independent fractal comprise at least a first iteration of a fractal shape and a last iteration of the fractal shape, contacting the first mixing component and second mixing component in a contact channel in fluid communication with each of the last iterations for the first mixing component independent fractal and the second mixing component independent fractal, and mixing the first mixing component and the second mixing component in a passive mixing structure located in at least a portion of the contact channel.
Other advantages, efficiencies, and features of disclosed embodiments also exist.
While the disclosure is susceptible to various modifications and alternative forms, specific embodiments have been shown by way of example in the drawings and will be described in detail herein. However, it should be understood that the disclosure is not intended to be limited to the particular forms disclosed. Rather, the intention is to cover all modifications, equivalents and alternatives falling within the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims.
Disclosed embodiments include modifications of earlier fractal mixer embodiments made by Amalgamated Research LLC (ARi) of Twin Falls, Id., USA. For example,
It is important to recognize that when using conventional mixer types, for example, impeller driven tank mixers or static mixers, scale-up difficulties will always be encountered. With scale-up of these devices, Reynolds number will be altered, and certain dimensional ratios must change. As a result, predicting scale-up performance can become very complicated for conventional mixing techniques.
However, fractal mixers, such as mixer 100, and the fractal mixers with the designs disclosed herein do not encounter these typical mixing scale-up issues. As long as mixing/reactor results are understood at the smallest scale of fluid contact, the devices can be scaled to any size and maintain the same result. This means that thorough testing can be done with as little as one smallest scale contact channel and then, via fractal structure, predictably scaled to any desired flow rate.
Presently disclosed embodiments involve adding passive mixing structures (e.g., mixing structures 12 as shown in
Passive Mixing Structure
As used herein, “passive mixing structure” means structure(s) which provide(s) a turbulent or laminar mixing within the smallest scale fractal contact/merging channels. Such structure can include conventional static mixer type elements or flow structure which results in stretch/fold or breakup/rejoin flow path geometry.
Static Mixer Elements as Passive Mixing Structure
Commercial (“off the shelf”) or in-house custom designed static mixer elements may be used as a component of disclosed passive mixing structure embodiments. The disclosed embodiments have application in both turbulent and laminar flows.
For fluids with Reynold's number less than 2000, mixing with static mixer elements is dependent upon flow division. For example, with the use of a particular type of laminar static mixer element, a first element splits the mixing components into two streams which are rotated 180 degrees. A second element splits the flow again, so now 4 streams (2, 4, 8, 16, etc., so an exponential increase in stratification). As the layers increase, the layer thickness decreases and the contact surface area (and therefore the extent of mixing) between components increases.
For fluids with a Reynold's number greater than 2000, the elements, as with laminar flow, mix due to flow division. However, elements also impart a rotational spin to the fluids which changes direction with each succeeding element. For turbulent flow, this radial mixing has a greater mixing effect than the flow division.
Stretch/Fold and Breakup/Rejoin as Passive Mixing Structure
A variety of flow geometries can be used to mix via stretch/fold or breakup/rejoin. The general method is to progressively increase the contact surface area between mixing components and therefore eventually reach a mixed state. For example, the schematic concept shown in
Fractal Mixing Reacting
ARi is the inventor of engineered fractal mixing/reaction, for example, as shown in U.S. Pat. No. 6,742,924, and others. One method uses fractal conduit structure to scale mixture components and increase their individual contact surface area prior to contact of the separate mixture components. Conventional (i.e., non-fractal) mixing is typically accomplished through turbulence, which is uncontrollable, asymmetric, and energetically expensive. Unlike turbulent mixers, ARi fractal mixers and fractal reactors are designed to maximize symmetry and minimize the unpredictable characteristics of turbulence. Rather than using turbulent fluid collisions, fractal mixers use precise engineered channeling to achieve fluid scaling and mixing, reducing energy use and improving process efficiency. Furthermore, reactions can proceed while minimizing off-reactions.
As demonstrated by U.S. Pat. No. 6,742,924, in fractal mixers, components to be mixed or reacted typically do not contact one another until fluid scaling is complete, eliminating issues such as large-scale process inhomogeneities or side reactions. In addition, because the final fluid contact volume can be extremely small, it is possible to alter many mixing and reaction conditions (such as pH or temperature) in a near instantaneous manner.
Some applications for fractal mixers and reactors include, but are not limited to, the following:
Liquid-liquid mixers/reactors;
Gas-gas mixers/reactors;
Liquid-gas mixers/reactors;
Multi-phase reactors;
Aerators;
Carbonators; and
Combustion mixers/reactors.
Because fractals are, by definition, scaling structures, fractal mixers and fractal reactors can be evaluated at lab or pilot-scale and reliably scaled up to any desired industrial size.
Returning to
ARi's fractal mixing has been demonstrated to be an efficient method of mixing. A number of fluid processing and other plants featuring this technology are installed throughout the world. These existing devices are typically large (3.9 to 6.55 meter diameter) and are indicative of the industrial scale to which the disclosed embodiments can be applied.
As discussed herein, while existing fractal mixers are successful mixing devices, there are special cases where the device may not reach maximum efficiency due to certain constraints on the smallest desired scale (the final smallest scale conduit). Therefore, the disclosed embodiments are options to be considered for special cases where the smallest scale fractal structure is, in some manner, problematic (as described above).
In order to address the special cases of small-scale fractal mixing difficulties, ARi has recognized that these issues may be significantly reduced by replacing the final smallest scale fractal structure with smallest scale passive mixing structure. Although this will introduce the negatives associated with such devices, their impact will be much reduced. Since material will already be scaled and homogenized within the fractal structure, the final small passive structure will result in relatively fast mixing time and efficiency. The larger scale turbulent energy dissipation and inhomogeneities will, for the most part, still be eliminated.
Advantages of the disclosed embodiments include, but are not limited to, the following:
very low energy consumption;
fast mixing time;
high efficiency for industrial scale turbulent flows;
high efficiency for flows which convert to laminar at the smallest fractal scale;
reduction of stagnation and back-mixing;
elimination of large scale inhomogeneities;
useful for reactions where sensitivity to mixing is high (high mixing Damkoehler number);
useful for avoiding side reactions with fast competitive-consecutive reactions;
useful for avoiding side reactions with fast competitive parallel reactions;
useful for enabling fast sequential reactions; and
useful for allowing immediate alteration of mixer/reactor conditions.
It is noted that a particular manufacturing technique or material is not required to realize the disclosed embodiments. Furthermore, for a given device, it is recognized that the manufacturing materials and methods may change depending upon the scale of different sections of the device. For example, it may be easiest or most cost effective to use computer aided machining to manufacture the largest scales of the device (largest conduit), while a different technique such as molding may be most efficient for manufacture of the smaller scales.
Any conventional techniques such as computer aided machining, photochemical etching, laser cutting, molding, and micro-machining may be used. Additive manufacturing techniques are also very applicable. Additive manufacturing techniques in general include binder jetting, directed energy deposition, powder bed fusion, sheet lamination, material extrusion, material jetting and vat photopolymerization. Additive manufacturing can be particularly applicable to the smallest scale passive mixing structure since these elements can have a quite complicated 3D structure and may be difficult to manufacture using more conventional methods. Other manufacturing techniques and materials may also be used.
The following exemplary embodiments are provided for illustration of a variety of ways to configure a fractal mixer 100. For example,
The number of mixing components can be of any number, for simultaneous mixing or for rapid sequential mixing of one component after another.
In the following fractal mixer 400 embodiment (shown in
It is noted that one of the valuable characteristics of the fractal mixing structure is that scale-up to higher flowrates is accomplished by adding larger and larger fractal iterations (i.e., fourth iteration, fifth iteration, etc.). And there is no limit on the number of iterations which can be used. In the
As illustrated in
As with the first component 402, the second component 404 flows from the inlet 6, through the smaller and smaller iterations of the fractal (i.e., 8, 9, 10) and to the contact channel 11 where it is mixed with the first mixing component 402.
As will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art having the benefit of this disclosure, in use the first 402 and second 404 fluids flow through independent fractals (1, 7) for eventual mixing. In the embodiment of
Although various embodiments have been shown and described, the present disclosure is not so limited and will be understood to include all such modifications and variations would be apparent to one skilled in the art.
This application, under 35 U.S.C. § 119, claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 63/310,248 filed on Feb. 15, 2022, and entitled “Fractal Mixing Reactor” the contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference herein. This application is also related to U.S. Pat. No. 6,742,924, issued Jun. 1, 2004, and titled “Fractal Device For Mixing And Reactor Applications,” the contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference herein.
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 63310248 | Feb 2022 | US |