This invention is directed to apparatus for detecting the weight of an occupant of a motor vehicle seat for purposes of determining whether and how forcefully to deploy supplemental restraints, and more particularly to apparatus for measuring forces applied to a frame of the vehicle seat.
Vehicle occupant detection systems are useful in connection with air bags and other pyrotechnically deployed restraints as a means of judging whether, and how forcefully, to deploy the restraint. One fundamental parameter in this regard is the weight of the occupant, as weight may be used as a criterion to distinguish between an adult and an infant or small child.
Most prior weight estimation techniques involve installing a pressure sensitive element such as a variable resistance pad or a fluid filled bladder in or under a vehicle seat cushion, and utilizing the pressure measurement as an indication of occupant weight. See, for example, the U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,474,327, 5,987,370, 6246936, 6,101,436 and 6,490,936, assigned to the assignee of the present invention and incorporated by reference herein.
Alternatively, the occupant weight may be measured with one or more load cells that sense the forces (strain or pressure) that the seat applies to a bracket that supports the seat on the vehicle floor. See, for example, the Publication Nos. 41520, 41542, 41549 and 41559 from the November, 1998 issue of Research Disclosure. Since the “frame-based” load cell configurations become part of the supporting structure of the seat, they tend to be relatively bulky and/or expensive to produce. Accordingly, what is needed is a frame-based occupant weight estimation apparatus that is simple and inexpensive to produce, and that does not compromise the structural integrity of the seat.
The present invention is directed to an improved frame-based occupant weight estimation apparatus for a vehicle seat, including compliant load transfer mechanisms interposed between the seat frame and floor brackets bolted to the vehicle floor. The compliant load transfer mechanisms translate the seat loads to central locations for measurement by a set of force sensors. The load transfer mechanisms preload the force sensor to enable off-loading detection, and an overload device securely anchors the seat to the floor bracket without interfering with normal load measurement.
The present invention will now be described, by way of example, with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
Referring to the drawings, and particularly to
The load transfer mechanism 20 is a compliant one-piece device formed of a suitable polymer material. It is similar to compliant pliers, and is a combination of rigid and compliant sections based on cross-sectional area. According to the present invention, the load transfer mechanism 20 translates a portion of the seat load at mounting bracket 12 to a force sensor disposed near the fore-aft midsection of seat 10. The mechanism 20 includes first and second co-joined lever arms 22 and 24. The lever arms 22 and 24 are physically joined at an active joint 26 and maintained in abutment at a point 28, which effectively constitutes a passive joint. In general, a passive joint is a joint that allows relative rotation between rigid segments (that is, the outboard ends of lever arms 22, 24) without using a pin joint. The rigid outboard ends of the arms 22 and 24 are respectively coupled to the seat mounting bracket 12 (via a pin 32) and the floor bracket 16, and the inboard ends terminate in jaws 34 and 36 that apply a compressive force to a force sensor 40. The force sensor 40 may be a strain gauge device or load cell such as produced and sold by Panasonic Corporation or Texas Instruments Corporation, and develops an electrical output signal functionally related to the force applied to it by the jaws 34, 36.
When the mechanism 20 is in a relaxed state prior to installation in the vehicle, the jaws 34, 36 are pried apart to receive the force sensor 40, which applies a pre-load force to the force sensor 40. On installation, the weight of the seat 10 acting on the arms 22 and 24 through mounting bracket 12 and floor bracket 16 increases the preload force, and load changes associated with occupant loading and unloading correspondingly increases and decreases the compressive force applied to force sensor 40. The preload applied to force sensor 40 is particularly important in frame-based occupant weight estimation because it enables off-loading detection. This can occur, for example, when the occupant leans back in the seat 10, reducing the force measured by the force sensors associated with the mounting brackets on the front of the seat 10. Due to the preload force, such off-loading can be measured and taken into consideration in the weight estimation calculations.
An overload plate 50 depicted at the left-rear seat mounting bracket 12′ limits upward movement of the seat 10 with respect to the floor bracket 16 in the event of a crash. In actuality, overload plates are typically installed at each of the four seat frame mounting brackets, but are omitted in
In summary, the present invention provides a seat frame-based occupant weight estimation apparatus including a compliant force transfer mechanism that translates vertical force associated with occupant weight to a central location for measurement by a pre-loaded force sensor. While described with respect to the illustrated embodiment, it will be recognized that various modifications in addition to those mentioned above may occur to those skilled in the art. For example, the seat 10 may be supported by a greater or lesser number of force transfer mechanisms 20 the force transfer mechanisms 20 may be oriented laterally with respect to the seat 10, and so on. Accordingly, it will be understood that systems incorporating these and other modifications may fall within the scope of this invention, which is defined by the appended claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5474327 | Schousek | Dec 1995 | A |
5942695 | Verma et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5987370 | Murphey et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6012007 | Fortune et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6058341 | Myers et al. | May 2000 | A |
6101436 | Fortune et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6138067 | Cobb et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6161891 | Blakesley | Dec 2000 | A |
6246936 | Murphey et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6360618 | Anahid et al. | Mar 2002 | B2 |
6424898 | Anishetty et al. | Jul 2002 | B2 |
6438476 | Gray et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6438477 | Patterson et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6479776 | Gray et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6542802 | Gray et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6578871 | Gray et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6587770 | Gray et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6748814 | Ishida et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6774319 | Aoki et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6841741 | Kajiyama | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6940026 | Rundell et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
20040011570 | Sakamoto et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20050011682 | Murphy | Jan 2005 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
10145370 | Dec 2002 | DE |
1267150 | Dec 2002 | EP |
1319549 | Jun 2003 | EP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050027418 A1 | Feb 2005 | US |