The present invention relates to an gyratory crusher used for crushing, and can be suitably used in the construction and mining industries.
Upon fine crushing of hard material, e.g. stone blocks or ore blocks, material is crushed that has an initial size of approx. 100 mm or less to a size of typically approx. 0-25 mm. Crushing, e.g. fine crushing, is frequently carried out by means of a gyratory crusher. Known crushers have an outer shell that is mounted in a stand. An inner shell is fastened on a crushing head. The inner and outer shells are usually cast in manganese steel, which is strain hardening, i.e. the steel gets an increased hardness when it is exposed to mechanical action. A known gyratory crusher has a driving device for crushing the material between the inner and outer shells in a known way.
However, about 125 years have passed since the first gyratorycrusher was created, and such crushers are now used almost everywhere in the world, but its basic design has not changed. Hence, if the crushing force in a gyratorycrusher is to be increased, e.g. by 20% to improve the crushing capacity, the crusher designers have hitherto conventionally only “upscaled” the crusher, i.e. most of the dimensions of a smaller crusher has been increased in an enlarged scale being proportional to the increased crushing force to be able to carry and withstand the increased crushing force. This enlargement of known crushers increases both their own/tare weight and their outer dimensions in proportion to the increased crushing force. This is shown in
It is an object of the invention to provide a gyratory crusher, which solve, or at least lessen, the problems mentioned above.
It is an object of the invention to provide a gyratory crusher enabling the use of the same foundation for an old crusher when replacing it with this inventive crusher as its outer dimensions are kept the same as the old crusher and fits onto the old foundation.
Another object of the invention is to provide a gyratory crusher that reduces the number of crusher parts and dimensions that have to be enlarged for carrying the increased crushing force and stresses associated therewith.
Yet another object of the invention is to provide a gyratory crusher that reduces its own weight compared to conventionally only enlarging most parts of a crusher for carrying an increased crushing force and stresses associated therewith, i.e. the inventive crusher has an optimized tare weight and load carrying ratio compared to known crushers.
These objects are achieved by means of a gyratory crusher, as claimed in the associated independent claim, preferred variants thereof being defined in the associated dependent claims.
The gyratory crusher according to the independent crusher claim makes it possible to increase crushing force while maintaining the outer dimensions of the whole crusher enabling assembly of the inventive crusher on an old foundation for a corresponding old crusher when replacing the old crusher.
The gyratory crusher according to the independent crusher claim also makes it possible to increase crushing force while maintaining the dimensions of most of the other parts of the whole crusher, wherefore the weight of the crusher is not increased to the same extent as would be the case if the crusher was only enlarged in the conventional way “all-over”.
The gyratory crusher according to the independent crusher claim also makes it possible to increase crushing force by only enlarging the dimensions of one part of the crusher instead of enlarging most of the other parts of the whole crusher, wherefore the work in designing and manufacturing the crusher is simplified and requires less effort in man hours compared to the conventional way of enlarging most parts of the crusher, i.e. in view of the whole chain of design and manufacture.
The gyratory crusher according to the independent crusher claim makes it possible to increase crushing force by only enlarging the dimensions of one part of the crusher for increasing stress support while minimizing crusher frame mass. This is done, in particular, by only enlarging one part, i.e. the hub of the crusher frame, for improving the stiffness of the lower crusher frame portion, wherefore the stresses in a so called “hot spot”, i.e. the weakest part of the design, is reduced. Hence, the high amplitude stresses in the hub area, in particular compressive stresses, are reduced eliminating crack formation in that area. Moreover, the gyratory crusher according to the independent crusher claim also improves the castability of the lower crusher frame portion.
In some embodiments/aspects, the drive ring pocket is bounded by an inner wall element and an outer wall element of the hub arranged at a distance from each other and the radial thickness of the waist portion is at least as thick as the sum of the radial thickness of the inner wall element and the width of the drive ring pocket (64). Thereby, the waist portion is thicker and stiffens the wall elements and the drive ring pocket from below and the hub from the outside, which increases the ability for the hub to withstand increased crushing forces.
In some embodiments/aspects, the hub comprises a hub bottom end and the radial thickness of the waist portion decreases towards the hub bottom end. Thereby, the waist portion is thicker closer to the wall elements forming a cantilever effect where the need for support is the largest, which increases the ability for the hub to withstand increased crushing forces.
In some embodiments/aspects, the hub comprises a hub bottom end, which comprises a wall element being a prolongation of the inner wall element for the hub in the direction of the centre axis, and the radial thickness of the wall element of the hub bottom end is substantially the same as the radial thickness of the inner wall element for the hub. Thereby, the waist portion is thicker closer to the wall elements forming a cantilever effect where the need for support is the largest but thinnest at the area where the need of support is the smallest, which increases the ability for the hub to withstand increased crushing forces while optimizing the amount of material used for the support.
In some embodiments/aspects, the arms of the lower frame portion are hollow and the waist portion is arranged between the arms of the lower frame portion. Similarly, this also increases the ability for the hub to withstand increased crushing forces while optimizing the location and the amount of material used for the support.
In some embodiments/aspects, the waist portion extends in the circumferential direction of the hub to and joins the arms of the lower frame portion. Thereby, the ability to withstand an increased crushing force is increased further, since the waist portion supports the arms from the hub outer wall to a distance that is as far from the hub outer wall as possible in relation to the extension from the hub of the arm for shortening the overhang of the arm as much as possible.
In some embodiments/aspects, the waist portion extends to and joins each arm of the lower frame portion by means of a transition section at each end of the waist portion forming a smooth connection between the waist portion and each arm. Similarly, the ability to withstand an increased crushing force is increased further, since the waist portion smears out the radius and increases the radius at the corner junction between the hub and the arms such that the stresses at the corner junction is reduced.
In some embodiments/aspects, the drive ring pocket of the hub is further bounded by a bottom wall element, which bottom wall element has a thickness in the direction of the centre axis being larger than the radial thickness of the inner wall element for the hub. Thereby, the bottom wall element thickens the waist portion forming a cantilever effect where the need for support is the largest, which increases the ability for the hub to withstand increased crushing forces while optimizing the location and the amount of material used for the support.
In some embodiments/aspects, the thickness of the bottom wall element in the direction of the centre axis is smaller than the distance from the bottom of the drive ring pocket to the hub bottom end. Similarly, the bottom wall element thickens the waist portion forming a cantilever effect where the need for support is the largest but makes the waist portion thinner at the area where the need of support is smaller, which increases the ability for the hub to withstand increased crushing forces while optimizing the location and the amount of material used for the support.
In some embodiments/aspects, the waist portion extends discontinuously around the circumference of the hub. Similarly, the discontinuously extending waist portion forms a cantilever effect where the need for support is the largest but does not extend at the area where the need of support is smaller, which increases the ability for the hub to withstand increased crushing forces while optimizing the location and the amount of material used for the support.
The effect of the invention is that the total stress is reduced by at least 35% and enables an increase of the crusher load by more than 25%.
The invention will be described in more detail with reference to the appended drawings, which show examples of presently preferred embodiments of the invention.
Prior art crushers 1 are shown in
A first crushing shell 71 is fixedly mounted on the crushing head 70 being fixedly mounted to the shaft 60. A second crushing shell 72 is fixedly mounted on the upper frame portion 41. Between the two crushing shells a crushing gap 73 is formed, i.e. delimited, the width of which, in axial section as illustrated in
A feed hopper 20 is also detachably mounted onto the upper crusher frame portion 41 to function as a first inlet of material to be crushed (see
The upper frame portion 41 also forms an inlet of material to be crushed, and the lower frame portion 42 forms, in principle, an outlet for the crushed material. The hub 43 supports the shaft 60 and is a centre hub of the crusher 10 in the lower frame portion 42. The lower frame portion is fenestrated for letting through crushed material.
The number of arms 44 depends on the size of the crusher 10 and may be between three and up to six, but is preferably between four and five. The hub 43 has one hub top end 45 facing the inlet of material to be crushed, e.g. the feed hopper 20, and one hub bottom end 46 at the outlet for the crushed material. The hub top end 45 comprises an inner wall element 47 and an outer wall element 48. The inner wall element 47 is arranged radially closer to the shaft 60, i.e. inwards of the hub and in relation to the outer wall element 48. The hub bottom end 46 comprises a wall element 401 being a prolongation of the inner wall element 47 for the hub top end 45 in the longitudinal direction of the hub 43.
The hub 43 is provided with a waist portion 402 with a radial thickness being larger than the width of the drive ring pocket 64 for the hub. This is shown in
The two inner and outer wall elements 47 and 48 of the hub top end 45 are placed at a distance from each other in the radial direction of the hub 43 for forming a gap between them. This gap forms a cavity, i.e. the drive ring pocket 64 for the drive ring 63.
The radial thickness of the waist portion 402 is at least as thick as the sum of the radial thickness of the inner wall element 47 and the distance between the inner wall element and the outer wall element 48, i.e. the width of the drive ring pocket 64 in the radial direction, i.e. substantially perpendicular to the longitudinal axis of the hub 43. Moreover, the radial thickness of the waist portion 402 may be thicker than the sum of the radial thickness of the inner wall element 47 and the distance between the inner wall element and the outer wall element 48. The radial thickness of the waist portion 402 may be substantially the same as the sum of the radial thickness of the inner wall element 47, the distance between the inner wall element and the outer wall element 48, and the radial thickness of the outer wall element 48 in the radial direction. Furthermore, the radial thickness of the waist portion 402 may be at least as thick as the sum of the radial thickness of the inner wall element 47 and the distance between the inner wall element and the outer wall element 48, but not as thick as the sum of the radial thickness of the inner wall element 47, the distance between the inner wall element and the outer wall element 48 and the radial thickness of the outer wall element 48 in the radial direction. Thereby, the radial thickness of the waist portion 402 may be less than the distance measured from the inner surface of a through hole 404 centralized in the hub 43 to the outer surface of the outer hub wall element 48. This distance is the same as an outer span measured towards the arms 44 from the surface of the inner hub wall element 47 facing the hole 404 and across the drive ring pocket 64 to the outer surface of the outer hub wall element 48 facing the outer parts of the lower crusher frame portion 42, this distance/span is seen clearly in
As shown in
The inner wall element 47 and the outer wall element 48 of the hub 43 are connected by a bottom wall element 49 (shown in
Each waist portion 402 extends only between its associated arms 44 similar to an arc around the circumference of the hub 43. Each waist portion forms a portion of a circular arc as the hub is cylindrical with a circular cross-section. If three arms 44 are utilized, each waist portion extends less than 120° of the circumference of the hub 43. If four arms are utilized, each waist portion extends less than 90° of the circumference of the hub 43, and if five arms are used, each waist portion extends less than 72° of the circumference of the hub. However, the length or extension of each waist portion arc is restricted by the arms and also by the width of each arm as the arm width occupies a certain distance along the hub circumference.
Each waist portion 402 as shown in
The invention does not increase the weight of the other parts of the crusher 10 except for the hub 43, i.e. the lower frame portion 43 such that handling, transport, assembly and disassembly of the parts of the crusher is simplified. Furthermore, the preferred thicknesses and location of the waist portion 402 on the hub optimize the sturdiness and rigidity of the hub and the whole crusher without risking making the separate parts and the assembled crusher 10 too “limpy” as the inventive waist portion on the hub increases the ability of the crusher to withstand higher crushing forces “all-over” without having to enlarge the rest of the crusher parts.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
11168977.4 | Jun 2011 | EP | regional |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2012/059962 | 5/29/2012 | WO | 00 | 12/16/2013 |