The present invention relates to content correlation in different networks.
The number of networked devices in local area networks, such as home networks, is on the rise, and so is the amount of content stored on them. Typically, consumers store and access several types of content (e.g., audio, video, image and other data files) in different formats using their home network devices. In addition to accessing such local content, home users also commonly access broadcast data streams via external networks such as live television/cable networks, the Internet, etc.
Media players, such as Windows Media Player, Real player, etc., extract related metadata information for music CDs (that are currently being played) from the Internet. Typically, such media players maintain a standard set of metadata types capable of being extracted and displayed, and rely on specific websites to obtain the required metadata.
However, the user cannot access other information related to the content (e.g., lyrics of a song, artist biography, etc., for a music CD). This is because such information is not among the standard metadata information available from specific Internet data sources that conventional media players are pre-configured to access. Further, the media player relies on specific Internet data sources (e.g., websites, remote data bases, etc.). If the data sources become inaccessible, the media player fails to obtain even the standard metadata information, even though the required information may be available from some other data source.
Further, since the amount of information available from the Internet is continually on the rise, a user can typically find information on the Internet that is related to content stored in his home network. The user can also find large quantities of related information in different formats (e.g., structured, semi-structured and unstructured) via multiple sources. As such, users are typically as interested in accessing information on the Internet as they are in accessing their own network content. However, conventional approaches do not enable seamless access to such related information. Conventionally, the user manually performs a search for the desired information using an Internet search engine or uses a web browser to directly access websites of interest. Thus, the user is forced to search for and analyze large quantities of information to identify/access the exact information he is looking for.
Desktop search applications such as Google Desktop Search and Copernic are extensions of Internet searches where users can search for content on their PCs. However, drawbacks of such search extensions include: (1) requiring users to form queries and to refine the queries in order to obtain desired results, (2) requiring computing resources that far exceed what consumer electronic devices provide for analyzing humongous search results, and (3) requiring input devices such as a keyboard to enter a significant amount of query text for searching. Therefore, there is a need for a method and system that enables simplified and seamless access to available content.
The present invention provides a method and system for correlating content available from a local network with information on an external network. The correlation framework identifies information related to content available on the local network of interest to the user and also identifies one or more external sources that contain such related information. Then, the correlation framework extracts data related to the identified information from the external sources, and determines correlations between the identified information and the data extracted from the external network.
Said framework further identifies additional correlations between the various available data (local data and Internet data) to the user. Internet search engines are used to obtain related information/metadata, thereby increasing the probability of finding the required information.
The user can look up several different types of information related to the local data that the user accesses. As such, the user is not restricted to choose from a standard list of available related/metadata information. Rather, correlations between different types of data are determined and presented to the user. The users can utilize CE devices for searching information using a small number of key strokes, without requiring a typical keyboard. Information is searched and suggested to the users based on context, to augment user experience of using CE devices. Therefore, the user can obtain desired Internet information with minimum involvement in search query construction.
These and other features, aspects and advantages of the present invention will become understood with reference to the following description, appended claims and accompanying figures.
The present invention provides a method and system that implement a framework for correlating content available from a local network with information on an external network. This enables seamless access to content available from the local network as well as related information available from external sources.
In one implementation, the present invention provides a framework for correlating home network content with information on the Internet, providing a user with seamless access to content stored in the home network and any related data available from the Internet. The user is not restricted to choose from a standard list of metadata information. Rather, the user is enabled to look up several different types of information related to the content in the home network. Correlations between the content in the home network and related information in the Internet are determined and presented to the user. Correlations refer to associations between different information.
In one example, Internet search engines and specific Internet service providers along with specific websites (web pages) are used to access information and metadata related to the user's query. In another example, only Internet search engines are used to obtain information and metadata related to the user's query.
The devices 20 and 30, respectively, can implement the HTTP protocol that uses UPnP for communication therebetween. Though in the example described herein the HTTP protocol is utilized by the network 10, those skilled in the art will recognize that the present invention is useful with other network communication protocols (e.g., Jini, HAVi, IEEE 1394, etc.). The network 10 can comprise a wired network, a wireless network, or a combination thereof.
The network 10 embodies an example framework for correlating home content with information on the Internet, according to the present invention.
In one example, the user is interested in purchasable albums by the artist “Sting.” The user's interest may be determined in different ways such as from a user request in a query, or from a query generated based on observations of the user's activities such as playing music by “Sting” on a MP3 player in the home network, etc. To resolve this query, the purchasable albums by “Sting” are identified by accessing the Internet. Then, based on the fact that the artist “Sting” is a member of the band “Police” (known from another Internet source), it is correlated that purchasable albums by the band “Police” are also relevant to the user's query. Therefore, the purchasable albums by “Police” are also identified. The list of purchasable albums by both “Sting” and the band “Police” are then presented to the user.
In another example, before presenting the list of purchasable albums by both “Sting” and the band “Police” to the user, it is determined if any albums by “Sting” and the “Police” are already available in the home network (e.g., on a device 20 or 30 in
The Client UI 402 provides interfaces to the users to access local information and any related Internet information that the CF 406 identifies. The Client UI 402 also allows the user to submit specific queries (e.g., “Get purchasable albums by artist “Sting””) to the CF 406.
The CF 406 resolves the queries that are based on the content of interest to the user, and provides to the user information obtained based on the queries, along with information derived using identified correlations. The CF 406 uses the Client UI 402 to display said information on a display for user viewing and selection.
The CIG 404 and the Data Extraction Plug-ins 408 extract local and Internet information. The CIG 404 extracts information about current user activity and device activity, about content stored on devices, about user history and preferences, etc.
The CF 406 includes a Query Execution Planner (QEP) 418, a Correlation Plan Executor (CPE) 420, a Correlation Constructor 422, a Plan Library 424 and multiple RuleLets 426. The QEP 418 retrieves a plan from the Plan Library 424 to resolve a query. A plan includes the various steps to be executed in order to resolve a particular type of query. Each plan step includes one or more RuleLet-references corresponding to the RuleLets 426. RuleLets 426 are specialized processes that execute a specific task (e.g., extracting metadata information for a music album from the Internet, extracting biography of an artist, etc.). Each plan also optionally includes details about the necessary parameters and/or required output (type).
The QEP 418 obtains any available contextual information about the user from the CIG 404 and customizes the plan based on the contextual information.
An example XML plan is shown in Table 1 below, which specifies the steps to execute in order to obtain albums by an artist that are available for purchase on the Internet and not available in the home network.
The CPE 420 invokes the appropriate RuleLets 426 as specified in each step of the plan. The CPE 420 executes the plan using various Data Extraction Plug-ins 408. The Data Extraction Plug-ins 408 extracts the desired data from sources including the local devices/media repository and/or the Internet (e.g., via Internet search engines such as Google, Yahoo, etc., and seed sources such as CDDB.org, allmusic.com). The CPE 420 also maintains a workspace 421 and stores the query search results from the Internet at each plan step until the whole plan is executed.
The CC 422 analyzes the search results provided by the CPE 420, and identifies correlations amongst the search results and the locally available information.
The Internet Unstructured Data Sources 412 comprise data segments (e.g., free text data segment, or marked up data segment, etc.) whose semantics cannot be analyzed (e.g., Google search ‘pope’ or <other>pope </other>, etc.). The Internet Structured Data Sources 414 comprise XML data with tags that define closely the semantics of small sections of free-form data (e.g., CD song information <artist>Sting</artist>, etc.). The Internet Semi-Structured Data Sources 416 comprises data with tags (e.g., XML) that define part of the free-form data, but do not describe the semantics of significant sections of the data (e.g., EPG data sections <review> . . . </review>, etc.).
The system 400 resolves a user query and determines correlations between local and Internet data, according to the following steps:
An example scenario for resolving a user query in the system 400 includes the following steps:
The modules 404, 406 and 408 in
As such, the present invention enables a user to utilize a CE device, such as a TV, to search for information using a small number of keys inputs, and without a typical keyboard. Further, users can obtain desired Internet information with minimum or no involvement in query construction. Information is suggested to the users based on context extracted from the user activities and the local content, in order to augment the user experience in using CE devices to seamlessly access information available locally and in external sources.
As is known to those skilled in the art, the aforementioned example architectures described above, according to the present invention, can be implemented in many ways, such as program instructions for execution by a processor, as logic circuits, as an application specific integrated circuit, as firmware, etc.
The present invention has been described in considerable detail with reference to certain preferred versions thereof; however, other versions are possible. Therefore, the spirit and scope of the appended claims should not be limited to the description of the preferred versions contained herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5616876 | Cluts | Apr 1997 | A |
5790935 | Payton | Aug 1998 | A |
5918223 | Blum et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5974406 | Bisdikian et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5983214 | Lang et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5983237 | Jain et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5995959 | Friedman et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6151603 | Wolfe | Nov 2000 | A |
6253238 | Lauder et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6334127 | Bieganski et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6412073 | Rangan | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6438579 | Hosken | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6480844 | Cortes et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6564210 | Korda et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6564213 | Ortega et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6637028 | Voyticky et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6721748 | Knight et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6766523 | Herley | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6774926 | Ellis et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6807675 | Maillard | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6826512 | Dara-Abrams et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6842877 | Robarts et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6954755 | Reisman | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6981040 | Konig et al. | Dec 2005 | B1 |
7028024 | Kommers et al. | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7054875 | Keith, Jr. | May 2006 | B2 |
7062561 | Reisman | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7069575 | Goode et al. | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7110998 | Bhandari et al. | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7158961 | Charikar | Jan 2007 | B1 |
7158986 | Oliver et al. | Jan 2007 | B1 |
7162473 | Dumais et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7165080 | Kotcheff et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7181438 | Szabo | Feb 2007 | B1 |
7194460 | Komamura | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7203940 | Barmettler et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7225187 | Dumais et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7283992 | Liu et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7284202 | Zenith | Oct 2007 | B1 |
7343365 | Farnham et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7363294 | Billsus et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7386542 | Maybury et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7389224 | Elworthy | Jun 2008 | B1 |
7389307 | Golding | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7433935 | Obert | Oct 2008 | B1 |
7483921 | Tsuzuki et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7552114 | Zhang et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7565345 | Bailey et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7577718 | Slawson et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7593921 | Goronzy et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7603349 | Kraft et al. | Oct 2009 | B1 |
7613736 | Hicken | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7617176 | Zeng et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7634461 | Oral et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7657518 | Budzik et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7685192 | Scofield et al. | Mar 2010 | B1 |
7716158 | McConnell | May 2010 | B2 |
7716199 | Guha | May 2010 | B2 |
7725486 | Tsuzuki et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7793326 | McCoskey | Sep 2010 | B2 |
8028323 | Weel | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8090606 | Svendsen | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8200688 | Messer et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
20010003214 | Shastri et al. | Jun 2001 | A1 |
20010023433 | Natsubori et al. | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20020002899 | Gjerdingen et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020022491 | McCann et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020026436 | Joory | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020032693 | Chiou et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020087535 | Kotcheff et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020147628 | Specter et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020161767 | Shapiro et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020162121 | Mitchell | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030009537 | Wang | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030028889 | McCoskey | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030033273 | Wyse | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030070061 | Wong et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030105682 | Dicker et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030131013 | Pope et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030158855 | Farnham et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030172075 | Reisman | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030184582 | Cohen | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030221198 | Sloo | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030229900 | Reisman | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030231868 | Herley | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040031058 | Reisman | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040073944 | Robert | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040107821 | Alcalde et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040194141 | Sanders | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040220925 | Liu et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040244038 | Utsuki et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040249790 | Komamura | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050004910 | Trepess | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050137966 | Billsus et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050144158 | Capper et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050154711 | McConnell | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050160460 | Fujiwara et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050177555 | Alpert et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050240580 | Zamir et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050246726 | Labrou et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050289599 | Matsuura et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060026152 | Zeng et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060028682 | Haines | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060036593 | Dean et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060066573 | Matsumoto | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060074883 | Teevan et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060084430 | Ng | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060095415 | Sattler et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060133391 | Kang et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060136670 | Brown et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060156252 | Sheshagiri et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060156326 | Goronzy et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060161542 | Cucerzan et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060195362 | Jacobi et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060210157 | Agnihotri et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060242283 | Shaik et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20070043703 | Bhattacharya et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070050346 | Goel et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070061222 | Allocca et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070061352 | Dimitrova et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070073894 | Erickson et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070078822 | Cuzerzan et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070107019 | Romano et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070130585 | Perret et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070143266 | Tang et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070156447 | Kim et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070179776 | Segond et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070198485 | Ramer et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070198500 | Lucovsky et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070208755 | Bhatkar et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070214123 | Messer et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070214488 | Nguyen et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070220037 | Srivastava et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070233287 | Sheshagiri et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070300078 | Ochi et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080040316 | Lawrence | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080082744 | Nakagawa | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080097982 | Gupta | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080114751 | Cramer et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080133501 | Andersen et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080133504 | Messer et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080162651 | Madnani | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080162731 | Kauppinen et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080183596 | Nash et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080183681 | Messer et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080183698 | Messer | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080204595 | Rathod et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080208839 | Sheshagiri et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080235209 | Rathod et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080235393 | Kunjithapatham et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080242279 | Ramer et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080250010 | Rathod et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080266449 | Rathod et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080288641 | Messer et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090029687 | Ramer et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090055393 | Messer | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090070184 | Svendsen | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090077052 | Farrelly | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090077065 | Song et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090094339 | Allen et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090112848 | Kunjithapatham et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090119717 | Newton et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090248883 | Suryanarayana et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090288014 | Fujioka | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100070895 | Messer | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100191619 | Dicker et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100257196 | Waters et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100281393 | Fujioka | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110208768 | Mehanna | Aug 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1393107 | Jan 2003 | CN |
1585947 | Feb 2005 | CN |
1723458 | Jan 2006 | CN |
1808430 | Jul 2006 | CN |
1848742 | Oct 2006 | CN |
1906610 | Jan 2007 | CN |
2003-099442 | Apr 2003 | JP |
2004505563 | Feb 2004 | JP |
2006228198 | Aug 2006 | JP |
2007012013 | Jan 2007 | JP |
10-2002-0005147 | Jan 2002 | KR |
10-2002-0006810 | Jan 2002 | KR |
10-2004-0052339 | Jun 2004 | KR |
10-2006-0027226 | Mar 2006 | KR |
WO 0137465 | May 2001 | WO |
WO 0243310 | May 2002 | WO |
WO03042866 | May 2003 | WO |
WO 2005055196 | Jun 2005 | WO |
WO2005072157 | Aug 2005 | WO |
WO 2007004110 | Jan 2007 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Search Authority Application No. PCT/KR2008/000537 dated May 15, 2008, 16 pages. |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for International Application No. PCT/KR2008/001558, dated Jun. 26, 2008, 10 pages. |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, dated Aug. 20, 2008; International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for International Application No. PCT/KR2008/001941, 10 pages. |
Apple Inc., Apple iTunes, http://www.apple.com/itunes/, Apr. 28, 2003, US. |
Babaguchi, N. et al., “Intermodal Collaboration: A Strategy for Semantic Content Analysis for Broadcasted Sports Video,” Proceedings on the 2003 International Conference of Image Processing, Sep. 2003, pp. 1-4, IEEE Publishing. |
Brill, E., “A Simple Rule-Based Part of Speech Tagger,” Proceedings of the Third Conference on Applied Natural Language Processing, Mar. 1992, pp. 152-155, Associate for Computational Linguistics, Morristown, NJ. |
Google Inc., Google Search Engine, http://www.google.com, Aug. 1998, US. |
Google Inc., Google Desktop Search, http://desktop.google.com, Oct. 15, 2004, US. |
Henzinger, M. et al., “Query-Free News Search,” Proceedings on the 12th International Conference on World Wide Web, May 2003, pp. 1-10, ACM Press, New York, NY. |
Livingston, K. et al., “Beyond broadcast: a demo,” Proceedings of the 8th international Conference on intelligent User interfaces, Jan. 2003, ACM Press, New York, NY. |
Microsoft Corporation, Microsoft Windows Media Player, http://www.microsoft.com/windows/windowsmedia/, Feb. 1999, US. |
Microsoft Corporation, MSN TV, http://www.webtv.com/pc, Feb. 2006, US. |
Opera Software ASA, Opera Browser for Devices, http://www.opera.com/products/devices/, Mar. 2006, US. |
Rau Lisa, F. et al, “Domain-independent summarization of news,” Summarizing Text for Intelligent Communication, Jun. 1994, pp. 71-75, Dagstuhl, Germany. |
Spalti, M., “Finding and Managing Web Content with Copernic 2000,” Library Computing, Sep. 2000, pp. 217-221, vol. 18, No. 3, Westport. |
Tjondronegoro, D. et al., “Extensible Detection and Indexing of Highlight Events in Broadcasted Sports Video,” Proceedings of the 29th Australasian Computer Science Conference, Jan. 2006, pp. 237-246, Hobart, Australia. |
Wachman, J. et al., “Tools for Browsing a TV Situation Comedy Based on Content Specific Attributes,” Multimedia Tools and Applications, Mar. 2001, pp. 255-284, vol. 13, No. 3, US. |
Yahoo Inc., Yahoo Search Engine, http://search.yahoo.com, Dec. 1998, US. |
Zhuang, Y. et al, “Applying Semantic Association to Support Content-Based Video Retrieval,” International workshop on Very Low Bitrate Video Coding (VLBV'98), Oct. 1998, US. |
Microsoft Corporation, Microsoft Windows Media Player 10, http://www.microsoft.com/windows/windowsmedia/mp10, Jun. 2004, US. |
Realnetworks, Inc., http://www.real.com, Jun. 1997, US. |
Copernic Inc., Copernic Search Engine for your PC, http://www.copernic.com, Sep. 19, 2008, US. |
Miyamori, H. et al., “Webified Video: Media Conversion from TV Programs to Web Content for Cross-Media Information Integration,” Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Database and Expert Systems Applications, 2005, pp. 176-185, Springer—Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg. |
Moraveji, N. et al., “DynaLine: A Non-Disruptive TV User Interface for Passive Browsing of Internet Video,” Microsoft Research Technical Report, 2006, pp. 1-4. |
Livingston, K. et al., “Beyond Broadcast,” 8th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, Jan. 2003, pp. 260-262, Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY. |
U.S. Non-final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/056,184 mailed on Jun. 11, 2010. |
U.S. Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/056,184 mailed on Nov. 23, 2010. |
U.S. Non-final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/732,887 mailed on Jun. 5, 2009. |
U.S. Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/969,778 mailed on Sep. 2, 2010. |
U.S. Non-final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/969,778 mailed on Apr. 19, 2010. |
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the international Searching Authority; International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for Application No. PCT/KR2008/000537 dated May 15, 2008, 16 pages. |
U.S. Non-final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/808,826 mailed on Jul. 24, 2009. |
Vechtomova, O. et al., “Query expansion with terms selected using lexical cohesion analysis of documents”, Information Processing and Management: an International Journal, Oct. 2006, pp. 849-865, vol. 43, No. 4, Pergamon Press Inc., Tarrytown, New York, United States. |
U.S. Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/633,880 mailed Oct. 28, 2010. |
U.S. Non-final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/725,865 mailed Sep. 14, 2010. |
U.S. Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/713,350 mailed Sep. 9, 2010. |
U.S. Non-final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/633,880 mailed May 11, 2010. |
AOL LLC, http://www.aol.com, downloaded Sep. 19, 2008, pp. 1-2, United States. |
Ask Search Engine, http://www.ask.com, downloaded Sep. 19, 2008, pp. 1, United States. |
U.S. Advisory Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/633,880 mailed Nov. 25, 2009. |
U.S. Non-final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No 11/900,847 mailed Oct. 28, 2009. |
“Placement in the DMOZ.org directory—Pure Power”, DMOZ / Google Directory, posted on Apr. 30, 2005, p. 1, http://www.ahfx.net/weblog/13. |
U.S. Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/633,880 mailed Jan. 6, 2009. |
U.S. Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/633,880 mailed Aug. 10, 2009. |
U.S. Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/713,350 mailed Mar. 2, 2009. |
U.S. Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/713,350 mailed Aug. 14, 2009. |
U.S. Non-final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/725,865 mailed Oct. 16, 2009. |
U.S. Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/725,865 mailed Mar. 16, 2010. |
U.S. Non-final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/713,350 mailed Mar. 8, 2010. |
U.S. Non-final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/808,826 mailed on Mar. 3, 2010. |
U.S. Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/263,089 mailed Mar. 25, 2011. |
U.S. Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/732,887 mailed on Dec. 4, 2009. |
U.S. Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/725,865 mailed Mar. 4, 2011. |
U.S. Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/633,880 mailed Mar. 17, 2011. |
Japanese Office Action dated Nov. 20, 2012 for Japanese Application No. 2009554447 from Japan Patent Office, pp. 1-4, Tokyo, Japan (Machine generated English-language translation included, pp. 1-2). |
Chinese Office Action dated Aug. 28, 2012 for Chinese Application No. 200880016311.X from China Patent Office, pp. 1-24, People's Republic of China (English-language translation included, pp. 1-15). |
U.S. Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 11/633,880 (SAM2A-P.29) mailed Oct. 24, 2012, United States. |
U.S. Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/544,994 (SAM2A-P.78) mailed Oct. 23, 2012, United States. |
Office Action dated Sep. 8, 2011 from U.S. Appl. No. 12/544,994. |
Office Action dated Jan. 17, 2012 from U.S. Appl. No. 12/544,994. |
Office Action dated Jun. 1, 2011 from U.S. Appl. No. 11/803,826. |
Office Action dated Jun. 15, 2011 from U.S. Appl. No. 11/969,778. |
Office Action dated Jun. 27, 2011 from U.S. Appl. No. 11/725,865. |
Office Action dated Jul. 6, 2011 from U.S. Appl. No. 11/789,609. |
Office Action dated Oct. 6, 2010 from U.S. Appl. No. 11/981,019. |
Office Action dated Dec. 29, 2009 from U.S. Appl. No. 11/981,019. |
Final Office Action dated Mar. 16, 2011 from U.S. Appl. No. 11/981,019. |
Final Office Action dated Jun. 17, 2010 from U.S. Appl. No. 11/981,019. |
Office Action dated Aug. 2, 2011 from U.S. Appl. No. 11/713,312. |
Office Action dated Aug. 19, 2011 from U.S. Appl. No. 11/821,938. |
Office Action dated Aug. 22, 2011 from U.S. Appl. No. 11/981,019. |
Final Office Action dated Sep. 1, 2011 from U.S. Appl. No. 12/263,089. |
Final Office Action dated Sep. 21, 2011 from U.S. Appl. No. 11/633,880. |
Final Office Action dated Sep. 27, 2011 from U.S. Appl. No. 11/969,778. |
Notice of Allowance dated Nov. 1, 2011 from U.S. Appl. No. 11/821,938. |
Final Office Action dated Nov. 10, 2011 from U.S. Appl. No. 11/803,826. |
Notice of Allowance dated Jan. 30, 2012 from U.S. Appl. No. 11/981,019. |
Office Action dated Mar. 30, 2012 from U.S. Appl. No. 11/633,880. |
Copernic Inc., http://copernic.com/en/products/desktop search/index.html, Sep. 18, 2008. |
Google Inc., webhp, http://www.google.com/webhp?complete-1&hl-en, downloaded Sep. 25, 2008, pg. 1. |
Tivo Inc., http://www.tivo.com, downloaded Sep. 19, 2008, 1 page. |
“Computing Meng Individual Project, ANSES—Automatic News Summarization and Extraction System, ”http://mmis.doc.ic.ac.uk/pr-1.wong-2002/overview.html, downloaded Sep. 24, 2008, 4 pages. |
Miyauchi et al., “Highlight Detection and Indexing in Broadcast Sports Video by Collaborative Processing of Text, Audio, and Image,” Sytstems and Computers in Japan, vol. 34, No. 12, 2003, pp. 22-31, Translated from Denshi Joho Tsushin Gakkai Ronbunshi, vol. J85-D-II, No. 11, Nov. 2002, pp. 1692-1700. |
Nitta, Naoka et al., “Automatic Story Segmentation of Closed-Caption Text for Semantic Content Analysis of Broadcasted Sports Video,” 8th International Workshop on Multimedia Information Systems, 2002, pp. 110-116. |
Miura, K. et al., “Automatic Generation of a Multimedia Encyclopedia from TV Programs by Using Closed Captions and Detecting Principal Viedo Objects,” Proceedings of the Eigth IEEE International Sympsosium on Miltumedia (ISM ' 06), 2006, IEEE, 8 pages. |
Chinese Office Action dated Aug. 14, 2009 from Chinese Patent Application No. 200810082621.3. |
Chinese Office Action dated Mar. 25, 2010 from Chinese Patent Application No. 200810082621.3. |
Chinese Office Action dated Feb. 1, 2011 from Chinese Application No. 200710196237.1. |
Chinese Office Action dated Sep. 23, 2011 from Chinese Application No. 200880016311.X. |
Chinese Office Action dated Sep. 8, 2011 from Chinese Application No. 200880009063.6. |
Chinese Office Action dated Apr. 17, 2012 from Chinese Application No. 200880016311.X. |
Japanese Office Action dated Mar. 21, 2012 from Japanese Application No. 2009-554447. |
Japanese Office Action dated Apr. 10, 2012 from Japanese Application No. 2010-508303. |
U.S. Advisory Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/544,994 mailed Jan. 23, 2013. |
Chinese Office Action dated Mar. 7, 2013 for Chinese Application No. 200880016311.X from China Intellectual Property Office, pp. 1-25, People's Republic of China (English-language translation included, pp. 1-16). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080235393 A1 | Sep 2008 | US |