The present invention relates generally to a frangible post used in a guardrail system.
Guardrails have been used for many years on our nation's highways to protected errant motorists from hazards alongside the roadway. Guardrails function by capturing errant vehicles and redirecting them away from the hazard. Hazards that are commonly protected by guardrails include trees, signs, culverts, bridge piers, steep edge drop-offs, and soft soil that could cause vehicle roll.
Guardrails are able to capture an errant vehicle by having the longitudinal strength to resist the vehicle impact. This means that the steel rail and its joints are stronger that the forces generated during the vehicle impact. The steel rail is held in place by either wood or steel posts. The posts hold the rail at the proper height and are designed to bend over and fail during an impact. These posts are individually relatively weak, however when taken as a system, they are able to resist the lateral loads imposed upon the rail. Additional structural strength is often provided to the rail by anchoring each end of the rail, either through the use of a crashworthy end terminal, or some other means of fixing the end of the steel rail to the ground.
Many end terminal designs, such as the design disclosed by Buth in U.S. Pat. No. 4,928,928, make use of an anchor cable. The anchor cable is attached on one end to the last section of guardrail and on the other end the cable is captured by a post at ground level. In this way, longitudinal forces that the rail experiences during a vehicle impact are transmitted through the cable to the ground via the post.
Although this arrangement provides an anchorage for the guardrail when it is hit downstream of the end, it also tends to make the guardrail more rigid if it is struck on the end, which may not be desirable in axial impacts. In response, some end terminal designs incorporate a breakaway post, which releases the cable if the terminal is hit on the end. Examples of posts that work in this way may be found in Buth, as well as U.S. Pat. No. 6,619,630 to Albritton, U.S. Pat. No. 5,967,497 to Denman, and US 2012/0056143 to James. The Buth and Denman devices make use of wood posts which have been weakened by placing a large hole in the center. The cable passes through and is captured by this hole. In this way the cable is restrained by the post, but if the post is broken off during an axial impact direction hit, the cable is released. Since wood has little ductility, the Buth and Denman devices fracture readily, releasing the cable, thereby reducing the possibility that the posts will retain the cable as the vehicle passes over the top.
Albritton discloses a steel break-away post that rotates around two hinge bolts during an impact. This rotation shears two frangible bolts, releasing the top half of the post, from the bottom half of the post. Although the Albritton device provides an anchorage to downstream rail impacts, while readily releasing during axial impact direction impacts, it is relatively expensive to manufacturing and requires numerous parts to be shaped and then welded together.
The device disclosed in James makes use of a single post that is modified to promote fracture. The post is modified by adding a central hole in the web and by notching the sides of the post below where the cable is attached. The James device also includes a slotted cable bracket that is welded above the central hole. Although the James device includes weakened sections to promote failure of the post, there is no guarantee that the post will actually fracture. Instead, depending upon the material used, the post may yield at the weakened sections and bend over. This is especially true if ductile materials, such as steel or aluminum are used. Indeed, James sized the central cutout of the post in such a way that the cable could pass through the post, once the post had yielded and released the cable. In this way, the James device does not rely on failure of the post to release the cable, but instead relies on the cable passing through the aperture in the post. The cable, however, may become caught on the post, rather than passing through the post, as intended.
Although adding holes and slots to posts to weaken them is well known in the art, such posts, if made of a ductile material, may tend to bend at the point of weakening, rather than break. As such, a portion of the post may remain and continue to bind the top and bottom portions of the post together.
Briefly stated, in one aspect, one embodiment of a guardrail anchor includes a frangible post having a cable anchor adapted to capture and hold an anchor cable. The one-piece frangible post is breakable from an intact anchor configuration to a releasable configuration during an axial impact. The frangible post includes completely separated upper and lower portions when in the releasable configuration. A laterally extending hinge member extends through a hinge opening. The frangible post experiences tension forces upstream of the hinge opening and compression forces downstream of the hinge opening during the axial impact.
In one embodiment, a frangible post includes an elongated member having a hinge opening, a hinge member extending through the hinge opening, and a zone of weakness positioned upstream of the hinge opening. The elongated member is moveable between an intact configuration to a releasable configuration in response to an impact applied transversely to the elongated member. A compressive force is applied to the hinge member and a tensile force is applied to the zone of weakness as the elongated post is moved from the intact configuration to the releasable configuration. The elongated member is completely separated into upper and lower portions when in the releasable configuration.
In another aspect, a method of breaking a guardrail post includes applying an impact force to an upper portion of a post from a vehicle traveling in a longitudinal direction, applying a compressive force to a hinge member with the post, and applying a tensile force to a zone of weakness formed in the post upstream of the hinge member and thereby completely separating the upper portion of the post from a lower portion of the post.
In one embodiment, the one piece frangible post is used solely to support portions of a cable barrier, a guardrail, a cable barrier end terminal, or a guardrail end terminal. In this embodiment the one piece post may or may not have a central hole for an anchor cable, or be affixed to an anchor cable bearing plate.
In yet another aspect, a bearing plate is engaged with the post and transfers loading from the cable to the first post. The bearing plate is releasably held by the upper portion of the post such that when the upper portion is broken off, the bearing plate is pulled upwards away from the bottom portion of the post to prevent snagging. The bearing plate is then released from the top post.
The present embodiments of the invention, together with further objects and advantages, will be best understood by reference to the following detailed description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.
It should be understood that the term “longitudinal,” as used herein means of or relating to length or the lengthwise direction of a guardrail, which is parallel to and defines an “axial impact direction.” The term “lateral,” as used herein, means directed toward or running perpendicular to the side of the guardrail. The term “coupled” means connected to or engaged with, whether directly or indirectly, for example with an intervening member, and does not require the engagement to be fixed or permanent, although it may be fixed or permanent, and includes both mechanical and electrical connection. It should be understood that the use of numerical terms “first,” “second” and “third” as used herein does not refer to any particular sequence or order of components; for example “first” and “second” rail sections may refer to any sequence of such sections, and is not limited to the first and second upstream rail sections unless otherwise specified. The term “frangible,” as used herein means to break or separate into two or more pieces. The term “yield” means to bend or deform, without breaking. The term “ductile” refers to a material that can yield substantially, e.g., bend 45 degrees or more, without breaking. The term “downstream,” as used herein refers to the direction with the flow of traffic that is adjacent an end terminal or guardrail, whereas the term “upstream” means in a direction against or opposite the flow of traffic. The term “plurality” means two or more, or more than one. The term “upstream” refers to a longitudinal direction closer to the impact end of the guardrail, while the term “downstream” refers to a longitudinal direction further away from the impact end.
As
In operation, the posts of guardrail and cable barrier end terminals must serve dual purposes. During axial impact direction impacts with the terminal, the posts must easily break away, allowing the errant vehicle to penetrate the system without causing excessive damage to the vehicle. Furthermore, in some systems the first post 1 of the system must also release the cable anchorage, e.g. bearing plate 31, which likewise will prevent appreciable tension being formed in the guardrail itself. However during lateral impacts with the end terminal or its downstream rail or cable, the cable anchorage of the end terminal must be held fast by the first post 1 with the tensile force developed in the rail or cable 30 being transferred to the ground through the first post 1.
In one embodiment, the frangible post 1 reliably resists the tension formed in the anchor cable 30 during redirective impacts and readily breaks away, releasing the cable during axial impact direction impacts. The releasable hinge member 2 takes the compressive loading of the post, forcing all of the remaining post material into tension, thereby causing the remaining material to tear, for example along the zone of weakness. However, once the remaining post material has torn completely through, the releasable hinge member 2 does not provide any appreciable joining force and the upper and lower portions of the post are allowed to easily separate, releasing the cable anchor. As referenced above, the bearing plate is initially pulled upwardly by the notch of the upper portion and then released as the upper portion separates from the lower portion. In this way, the frangible post is breakable from an intact anchor configuration to a releasable configuration during an axial impact, wherein the frangible post is broken into completely separate upper and lower portions when in the releasable configuration.
There may be some spacing between the hinge member and the hole in an initial intact anchor configuration, for example due to tolerances. In such a case, during the beginning of an axial impact, the post follows classical beam bending, i.e. tension upstream of the neutral axis and compression downstream. The material in tension stretches, then yields, and then fails. This moves the neutral axis downstream, bringing new material into tension. At the same time the material in compression closes any spacing between the post and the hinge member at the hinge hole, causing the hinge member to be compressed. As more and more of the material in tension fails, the neutral axis moves further downstream, until at some point all of the remaining post material is in tension and the hinge member takes all of the compressive load. The remaining post material then fails, releasing the upper portion of the post.
The frangible post may be used solely to support portions of a cable barrier, a guardrail, a cable barrier end terminal, or a guardrail end terminal. In one embodiment, the one piece post may not have a central hole for an anchor cable, or be affixed to an anchor cable bearing plate.
Although the present invention has been described with reference to preferred embodiments, those skilled in the art will recognize that changes may be made in form and detail without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. As such, it is intended that the foregoing detailed description be regarded as illustrative rather than limiting and that it is the appended claims, including all equivalents thereof, which are intended to define the scope of the invention.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/774,209, filed Mar. 7, 2013, and also claims benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/717,736, filed Oct. 24, 2012, the entire disclosures of which are hereby incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4330106 | Chisholm | May 1982 | A |
4838523 | Humble et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
4928928 | Buth et al. | May 1990 | A |
5503495 | Mak et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5664905 | Thompson et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5775675 | Sicking et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5855443 | Faller et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5967497 | Denman et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6065738 | Pearce et al. | May 2000 | A |
6065894 | Wasson et al. | May 2000 | A |
6142452 | Denman et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6210066 | Dent | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6254063 | Rohde et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6264162 | Barnes et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6398192 | Albritton | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6409156 | Dent | Jun 2002 | B2 |
6488268 | Albritton | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6505820 | Sicking et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6619630 | Albritton | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6729607 | Alberson et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6793204 | Albritton | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6886813 | Albritton | May 2005 | B2 |
6902150 | Alberson et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6932327 | Alberson et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
7367549 | Titmus | May 2008 | B2 |
8177194 | James | May 2012 | B2 |
8215619 | Leonhardt et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
20020030183 | Albritton | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20060027797 | Sicking et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060038164 | Sicking et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20100192482 | James | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20120056143 | James | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120199802 | James | Aug 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0 924 347 | Jun 1999 | EP |
1383506 | Dec 2010 | IT |
AN2011A00004 | Jan 2011 | IT |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report issued in corresponding PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US2013/066118, dated Apr. 16, 2014, 2 pages. |
Alberson, Dean C. et al., “A Review of Cable/Wire Rope Barrier Design Considerations,” Transportation Research Board 2003 Annual Meeting, Transportation Research Board, Washington D.C., 2003, 25 pages. |
Bielenberg, Robert W. et al., “Development of the Universal Breakaway Steel Post for the Bullnose Median Barrier,” Transportation Research Board 2012 Annual Meeting, Transportation Research Board, Washington D.C., 2012, 21 pages. |
Hitz, Rebecca A. et al., “Design and Evaluation of a Low-Tension Cable Guardrail End Terminal System,” Final Report to the Midwest States' Regional Pooled Fund Program MwRSF Research Report No. TRP-03-131-08, Midwest Roadside Safety Facility, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Jul. 15, 2008, 251 pages. |
Schmidt, Jennifer D. et al., “Investigating the Use of a New Universal Breakaway Steel Post—Phase 3,” Midwest Roadside Safety Facility, University of Nebraska-Lincoln and Midwest States Regional Pooled Fund Program, Nebraska Department of Roads, MwRSF Research Report No. TRP-03-244-10, Dec. 16, 2010, 139 pages. |
Sicking, Dean L. et al., “Design and Development of Steel Breakaway Posts,” Transportation Research Record 1720, Paper No. 00-628, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington D.C., 2000, 22 pages. |
Correspondence from John R. Baxter, P.E., Director, Office of Safety Design, Office of Safety, U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C., to Mr. Kaddo Kothmann, President, Road Systems, Incorporated, Big Spring, Texas, dated Mar. 8, 2005, with enclosures, 9 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140110652 A1 | Apr 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61774209 | Mar 2013 | US | |
61717736 | Oct 2012 | US |