FREE-CUTTING STEEL AND METHOD OF PRODUCING SAME

Information

  • Patent Application
  • 20230108640
  • Publication Number
    20230108640
  • Date Filed
    March 31, 2021
    3 years ago
  • Date Published
    April 06, 2023
    a year ago
Abstract
Provided is a free-cutting steel that, despites not containing Pb, has machinability by cutting higher than or equal to that of a low carbon sulfur-lead composite free-cutting steel. A free-cutting steel comprises: a chemical composition that contains, in mass %, C: less than 0.09%, Mn: 0.50% to 1.50%, S: 0.250% to 0.600%, O: more than 0.010% and 0.050% or less, and Cr: 0.50% to 1.50%, with a balance consisting of Fe and inevitable impurities, and in which a A value defined by the following formula (1) is 6.0 to 18.0, and a steel microstructure in which at least 500 particles/mm2 of sulfide of less than 1 μm in equivalent circle diameter and at least 2000 particles/mm2 of sulfide of 1 μm to 5 μm in equivalent circle diameter are distributed.
Description
TECHNICAL FIELD

The present disclosure relates to a free-cutting steel, in particular a steel that is a substitute for a free-cutting steel containing sulfur and a small amount of lead as elements for improving machinability by cutting. The present disclosure relates to a free-cutting steel having machinability by cutting higher than or equal to that of a low carbon sulfur-lead composite free-cutting steel, and a method of producing the same.


BACKGROUND

Low carbon sulfur-lead free-cutting steel as represented by JIS SUM24L contains a large amount of lead (Pb) and sulfur (S) as free-cutting elements and thus has excellent machinability by cutting.


In steel materials, lead is useful for reducing tool wear and improving chip treatability in cutting work. Hence, lead is regarded as an important element that significantly improves the machinability by cutting of materials, and is used in many steel products produced by cutting work. With the rise of environmental awareness in recent years, however, there is a growing movement to abolish or restrict the use of environmentally hazardous substances worldwide. Lead is one of such environmentally hazardous substances, and restriction on the use of lead is required.


In view of this, for example, JP H9-25539 A (PTL 1) discloses a non-Pb-containing free-cutting non-heat-treated steel. Likewise, J P 2000-160284 A (PTL 2) discloses a non-Pb-containing free-cutting steel. Moreover, JP H2-6824 B (PTL 3) discloses a free-cutting steel containing Cr which can form a compound with S more easily than Mn to thereby cause a Mn—Cr—S-based inclusion to be present and ensure machinability by cutting.


CITATION LIST
Patent Literature



  • PTL 1: JP H9-25539 A

  • PTL 2: JP 2000-160284 A

  • PTL 3: JP H2-6824 B



SUMMARY
Technical Problem

The technique described in PTL 1 is intended for a non-heat-treated steel that contains 0.2% or more of C and thus is hard, and the use of Nd which is a special element requires high production costs. With the technique described in PTL 2, adding a large amount of S causes low hot ductility and induces cracking during continuous casting or hot rolling, which is problematic in terms of surface characteristics. With the technique described in PTL 3, Cr and S are added while reducing the amount of Mn. However, due to high Cr content of 3.5% or more, not only cost reduction is difficult but also a large amount of CrS forms, causing a production problem in that material smelting treatment in the steelmaking process is difficult.


It could therefore be helpful to provide a free-cutting steel that, despites not containing Pb, has machinability by cutting higher than or equal to that of a low carbon sulfur-lead composite free-cutting steel and does not need to contain Nd or a large amount of S or Cr as in PTL 1 to PTL 3, together with a method of producing the same.


Solution to Problem

Upon Careful Examination, we Discovered the Following:


(i) Adding appropriate amounts of Mn, Cr, and S and optimizing the ratio 2(Mn+2Cr)/S causes an appropriate amount of sulfide to have a Mn—Cr—S composite-based composition. The sulfides of the composite-based composition can be refined by hot working.


(ii) When the sulfides are finer, the lubricating action is greater, and the formation of hard phase adhering to the tool surface, called a built-up edge, can be prevented. Thus, machinability by cutting including chip treatability and surface roughness can be significantly improved.


(iii) It is conventionally known that machinability by cutting is improved with an increase in S content in steel. There is, however, an upper limit to the amount of S that can be added in steel, from the viewpoint of hot workability or mechanical property anisotropy. If sulfides in steel are fine, machinability by cutting including chip treatability and surface roughness is significantly improved. Hence, by finely distributing sulfides in steel, favorable machinability by cutting can be ensured within the upper limit of the S content imposed from the viewpoint of hot workability or mechanical property anisotropy.


The Present Disclosure is Based on these Discoveries. We Thus Provide:


1. A free-cutting steel comprising: a chemical composition that contains (consists of), in mass %, C: less than 0.09%, Mn: 0.50% to 1.50%, S: 0.250% to 0.600%, O: more than 0.0100% and 0.0500% or less, and Cr: 0.50% to 1.50%, with a balance consisting of Fe and inevitable impurities, and in which a A value defined by the following formula (1) is 6.0 to 18.0,





A value=2([Mn]+2[Cr])/[S]  (1)


where [Mn], [Cr], and [S] respectively denote contents in mass % of elements Mn, Cr, and S; and a steel microstructure in which at least 500 particles/mm2 of sulfide of less than 1 μm in equivalent circle diameter and at least 2000 particles/mm2 of sulfide of 1 μm to 5 μm in equivalent circle diameter are distributed.


2. The free-cutting steel according to 1., wherein the chemical composition further contains, in mass %, one or more selected from the group consisting of Si: 0.50% or less, P: 0.10% or less, Al: 0.010% or less, and N: 0.0150% or less.


3. The free-cutting steel according to 1. or 2., wherein the chemical composition further contains, in mass %, one or more selected from the group consisting of Ca: 0.0010% or less, Se: 0.30% or less, Te: 0.15% or less, Bi: 0.20% or less, Sn: 0.020% or less, Sb: 0.025% or less, B: 0.010% or less, Cu: 0.50% or less, Ni: 0.50% or less, Ti: 0.100% or less, V: 0.20% or less, Zr: 0.050% or less, and Mg: 0.0050% or less.


4. A method of producing a free-cutting steel, the method comprising: rolling a rectangular cast steel at a heating temperature of 1120° C. or more and an area reduction rate of 60% or more to obtain a billet, the rectangular cast steel having a chemical composition that contains, in mass %, C: less than 0.09%, Mn: 0.50% to 1.50%, S: 0.250% to 0.600%, O: more than 0.0100% and 0.0500% or less, and Cr: 0.50% to 1.50% with a balance consisting of Fe and inevitable impurities, and in which a A value defined by the following formula (1) is 6.0 to 18.0,





A value=2([Mn]+2[Cr])/[S]  (1)


where [Mn], [Cr], and [S] respectively denote contents in mass % of elements Mn, Cr, and S, and a side length of a cross section of the rectangular cast steel perpendicular to a longitudinal direction being 250 mm or more; and hot working the billet at a heating temperature of 1050° C. or more and an area reduction rate of 75% or more.


5. The method of producing a free-cutting steel according to 4., wherein the chemical composition further contains, in mass %, one or more selected from the group consisting of Si: 0.50% or less, P: 0.10% or less, Al: 0.010% or less, and N: 0.0150% or less.


6. The method of producing a free-cutting steel according to 4. or 5., wherein the chemical composition further contains, in mass %, one or more selected from the group consisting of Ca: 0.0010% or less, Se: 0.30% or less, Te: 0.15% or less, Bi: 0.20% or less, Sn: 0.020% or less, Sb: 0.025% or less, B: 0.010% or less, Cu: 0.50% or less, Ni: 0.50% or less, Ti: 0.100% or less, V: 0.20% or less, Zr: 0.050% or less, and Mg: 0.0050% or less.


Advantageous Effect

It is thus possible to obtain a free-cutting steel having excellent machinability by cutting without adding lead.







DETAILED DESCRIPTION

A free-cutting steel according to the present disclosure will be described in detail below. First, the reasons for limiting the content of each component in the chemical composition of the free-cutting steel will be described below. Herein, “%” with regard to components is mass % unless otherwise stated.


C: less than 0.09%


C is an important element that greatly influences the strength and the machinability by cutting of the steel. If the C content is 0.09% or more, the steel hardens and the strength increases excessively, and as a result the machinability by cutting degrades. The C content is therefore less than 0.09%. The C content is preferably 0.07% or less. From the viewpoint of ensuring the strength, the C content is preferably 0.01% or more, and more preferably 0.03% or more.


Mn: 0.50% to 1.50%


Mn is a sulfide forming element important for improvement in machinability by cutting. If the Mn content is less than 0.50%, the amount of sulfide is small, and sufficient machinability by cutting cannot be obtained. The lower limit is therefore 0.50%. The Mn content is preferably 0.70% or more. If the Mn content is more than 1.50%, sulfides not only coarsen but also extend long, causing a decrease in machinability by cutting. In addition, the mechanical properties decrease. The upper limit of the Mn content is therefore 1.50%. The Mn content is preferably 1.20% or less.


S: 0.250% to 0.600%


S is a sulfide forming element effective in improving the machinability by cutting. If the S content is less than 0.250%, fine sulfides are few, so that the machinability by cutting cannot be improved. If the S content is more than 0.600%, sulfides coarsen excessively and the number of fine sulfides decreases, as a result of which the machinability by cutting decreases. Moreover, the hot workability and the ductility which is an important mechanical property decrease. The S content is therefore in a range of 0.250% to 0.600%. The S content is preferably 0.300% or more. The S content is preferably 0.450% or less.


O: more than 0.0100% and 0.0500% or less


O is an element that forms oxide and serves as a sulfide precipitation nucleus and also is effective in suppressing extension of sulfides during hot working such as rolling. This action can improve the machinability by cutting. If the O content is 0.0100% or less, the sulfide extension suppressing effect is insufficient and extended sulfides remain, so that the foregoing effect cannot be expected. The O content is therefore more than 0.0100%. If the O content is more than 0.0500%, not only the sulfide extension suppressing effect is saturated but also the amount of hard oxide-based inclusions increases. Adding an excessive amount of O is also economically disadvantageous. The upper limit of the O content is therefore 0.0500%.


Cr: 0.50% to 1.50%


Cr has an effect of forming sulfides and improving the machinability by cutting through lubricating action during cutting. Cr also suppresses extension of sulfides during hot working such as rolling, and thus can improve the machinability by cutting. If the Cr content is less than 0.50%, the formation of sulfides is insufficient and extended sulfides tend to remain, so that the foregoing effect cannot be expected. If the Cr content is more than 1.50%, not only the steel hardens but also sulfides coarsen. Moreover, the extension suppressing effect is saturated, and the machinability by cutting decreases. Besides, adding an excessive amount causes an increase in alloy costs, which is economically disadvantageous. The Cr content is therefore 0.50% to 1.50%. The Cr content is preferably 0.70% or more. The Cr content is preferably 1.30% or less.


The free-cutting steel contains the above-described components with the balance consisting of Fe and inevitable impurities, or contains the above-described components and further contains the below-described optional components. The free-cutting steel preferably contains the above-described components or preferably contains the above-described components and further the below-described optional components, with the balance consisting of Fe and inevitable impurities.


It is important that, in the above-described chemical composition, a A value defined by the following formula (1) is 6.0 to 18.0.





A value=2([Mn]+2[Cr])/[S]  (1)


where [M] is the content (mass %) of the corresponding element in brackets.


The A value is an important index that influences refinement of Mn—Cr—S-based sulfide during hot working such as rolling, and limiting the A value can improve the machinability by cutting. If the A value is less than 6.0, sulfide of Mn—S alone forms, which tends to be coarse. Consequently, the machinability by cutting degrades. If the A value is more than 18.0, not only the sulfide refining effect is saturated but also the amount of the sulfide forming elements is excessively large relative to sulfur, causing sulfides to coarsen. The A value is therefore 6.0 to 18.0. The A value is preferably 6.5 or more. The A value is preferably 17.0 or less.


The optional components will be described below. In addition to the above-described basic components, the free-cutting steel according to the present disclosure may optionally contain one or more selected from the group consisting of


Si: 0.50% or less,


P: 0.10% or less,


Al: 0.010% or less, and


N: 0.0150% or less.


Si: 0.50% or less


Si is a deoxidizing element. Moreover, Si oxide acts as a sulfide formation nucleus to promote the formation of sulfides and refine the sulfides and thus improve the cutting tool life. Accordingly, Si may be contained in the steel in order to further extend the tool life. If the Si content is more than 0.50%, the oxide increases in size and decreases in number. Such oxide is ineffective as a sulfide formation nucleus, and also hard oxide induces abrasive wear and leads to degradation in tool life. The Si content is therefore 0.50% or less. The Si content is preferably 0.03% or less. To achieve the foregoing action by Si, the Si content is preferably 0.001% or more.


P: 0.10% or less


P is an element effective in suppressing the formation of built-up edges during cutting work to thus reduce finishing surface roughness. From this viewpoint, the P content is preferably 0.01% or more. If the P content is more than 0.10%, the material hardens, so that the machinability by cutting decreases and the hot workability and the ductility decrease significantly. The P content is therefore preferably 0.10% or less. The P content is more preferably 0.08% or less.


Al: 0.010% or less


Al is a deoxidizing element as with Si, and may be contained in the steel. Al forms Al2O3 in the steel. This oxide is hard and causes degradation in cutting tool life due to abrasive wear. Hence, adding an excessive amount of Al needs to be avoided. From this viewpoint, the Al content is preferably 0.010% or less. The Al content is more preferably 0.005% or less. From the viewpoint of achieving the deoxidizing effect by Al, the Al content is preferably 0.001% or more.


N: 0.0150% or less


N forms nitride with Cr and the like. As a result of the nitride decomposing due to temperature increase during cutting work, an oxide film called belag forms on the tool surface. Belag has an action of protecting the tool surface and thereby improving the tool life. Accordingly, N may be contained in the steel. To effectively achieve this action, the N content is preferably 0.0050% or more. If the N content is more than 0.0150%, not only the effect of belag is saturated but also the material hardens, as a result of which the tool life shortens. The N content is therefore preferably 0.0150% or less. The N content is more preferably 0.0060% or more. The N content is more preferably 0.0120% or less.


The free-cutting steel according to the present disclosure may optionally further contain one or more selected from the group consisting of


Ca: 0.0010% or less,


Se: 0.30% or less,


Te: 0.15% or less,


Bi: 0.20% or less,


Sn: 0.020% or less,


Sb: 0.025% or less,


B: 0.010% or less,


Cu: 0.50% or less,


Ni: 0.50% or less,


Ti: 0.100% or less,


V: 0.20% or less,


Zr: 0.050% or less, and


Mg: 0.0050% or less.


Ca, Se, Te, Bi, Sn, Sb, B, Cu, Ni, Ti, V, Zr, and Mg each have an action of improving the machinability by cutting, and accordingly may be added in the case where the machinability by cutting is considered important. In the case of adding these elements in order to improve the machinability by cutting, if their respective contents are Ca: less than 0.0001%, Se: less than 0.02%, Te: less than 0.10%, Bi: less than 0.02%, Sn: less than 0.003%, Sb: less than 0.003%, B: less than 0.003%, Cu: less than 0.05%, Ni: less than 0.50%, Ti: less than 0.003%, V: less than 0.005%, Zr: less than 0.005%, and Mg: less than 0.0005%, sufficient effect cannot be achieved. Accordingly, their respective contents are preferably Ca: 0.0001% or more, Se: 0.02% or more, Te: 0.10% or more, Bi: 0.02% or more, Sn: 0.003% or more, Sb: 0.003% or more, B: 0.003% or more, Cu: 0.05% or more, Ni: 0.05% or more, Ti: 0.003 or more, V: 0.005% or more, Zr: 0.005% or more, and Mg: 0.0005% or more.


If their respective contents are Ca: more than 0.0010%, Se: more than 0.30%, Te: more than 0.15%, Bi: more than 0.20%, Sn: more than 0.020%, Sb: more than 0.025%, B: more than 0.010%, Cu: more than 0.50%, Ni: more than 0.50%, Ti: more than 0.100%, V: more than 0.20%, Zr: more than 0.050%, and Mg: more than 0.0050%, the effect is saturated, and also adding such amounts is economically disadvantageous. Accordingly, their respective contents are preferably Ca: 0.0010% or less, Se: 0.30% or less, Te: 0.15% or less, Bi: 0.20% or less, Sn: 0.020% or less, Sb: 0.025% or less, B: 0.010% or less, Cu: 0.50% or less, Ni: 0.50% or less, Ti: 0.100% or less, V: 0.20% or less, Zr: 0.050% or less, and Mg: 0.0050% or less.


(Steel Microstructure)


Distribution of at Least 500 Particles/Mm2 of Sulfide of Less than 1 μm in Equivalent Circle Diameter and at Least 2000 Particles/Mm2 of Sulfide of 1 μm to 5 μm in Equivalent Circle Diameter


Fine dispersion of sulfides in the microstructure of the free-cutting steel is advantageous in promoting the lubricating action between the tool and the work material during cutting work. To ensure the machinability by cutting of the free-cutting steel by such fine dispersion of sulfides, at least a predetermined amount of sulfides of less than 1 μm in equivalent circle diameter and at least a predetermined amount of sulfides of 1 μm to 5 μm in equivalent circle diameter need to be dispersed in the steel microstructure. Sulfides of less than 1 μm in equivalent circle diameter are mainly effective for lubrication between the tool and the work material. Sulfides of 1 μm to 5 μm in equivalent circle diameter not only have the foregoing lubrication effect but also are effective for chip partibility. Hence, the number of sulfides of less than 1 μm in equivalent circle diameter is at least 500 particles/mm2, and the number of sulfides of 1 μm to 5 μm in equivalent circle diameter is at least 2000 particles/mm2.


The conditions for producing the free-cutting steel according to the present disclosure will be described below.


A rectangular cast steel that has the above-described chemical composition and whose side length of a cross section perpendicular to the longitudinal direction is 250 mm or more is rolled at a heating temperature of 1120° C. or more and an area reduction rate of 60% or more to obtain a billet, and the billet is hot worked at a heating temperature of 1050° C. or more and an area reduction rate of 75% or more.


(Cast Steel)


Rectangular Cross Section Whose Side Length of Cross Section Perpendicular to Longitudinal Direction is 250 mm

First, a molten steel adjusted to the chemical composition is cast to obtain a cast steel. As the cast steel, a rectangular cast steel whose side length of a cross section perpendicular to the longitudinal direction is 250 mm or more is used.


The cast steel is produced as a cast steel having a rectangular cross section by continuous casting or ingot casting. If the side length of the rectangular cross section is less than 250 mm, sulfide particles increase in size in the solidification of the cast steel. Consequently, coarse sulfides remain even after the cast steel is subsequently rolled to obtain a billet, which is disadvantageous in terms of sulfide refinement after final hot working. The side length of the cast steel in the cross section is therefore 250 mm or more. The side length of the cast steel in the cross section is more preferably 300 mm or more. Although no upper limit is placed on the side length of the cast steel in the cross section, the side length is preferably 600 mm or less from the viewpoint of the rollability in the hot rolling following the casting.


(Hot Rolling of Cast Steel into Billet)


Heating Temperature of Cast Steel: 1120° C. or More

The cast steel is hot rolled into a billet. The heating temperature in the hot rolling needs to be 1120° C. or more. If the heating temperature is less than 1120° C., coarse sulfides crystallized during cooling-solidification in the casting stage do not dissolve, and remain even in the billet. Consequently, the sulfides remain coarse even after the hot working, and the desired fine sulfide distribution state cannot be achieved. Accordingly, the heating temperature when hot rolling the cast steel into the billet is 1120° C. or more, and is preferably 1150° C. or more. Although no upper limit is placed on the heating temperature of the cast steel, the heating temperature is preferably 1300° C. or less and more preferably 1250° C. or less from the viewpoint of preventing scale loss.


Area Reduction Rate in Hot Rolling of Cast Steel into Billet: 60% or More


Since the sulfide particles crystallized during the solidification are large in size, the sulfide particles need to be reduced in size to some extent in bloom rolling. If the area reduction rate in the hot rolling is low, the sulfide particles remain large in the billet. In such a case, it is difficult to refine the sulfide particles in heating/rolling when subsequently hot working the billet into a steel bar or a wire rod. In view of this, the area reduction rate in the hot rolling of the cast steel into the billet is 60% or more.


The area reduction rate (%) in the hot rolling can be calculated according to the following formula:





100×(S0−S1)/S0


where S0 is the cross-sectional area of a cross section perpendicular to the hot rolling direction of the cast steel before the hot rolling, and S1 is the cross-sectional area of a cross section perpendicular to the hot rolling direction of the billet produced as a result of the hot rolling.


(Hot Working of Billet)


Heating Temperature: 1050° C. or More

The heating temperature when hot working the billet into a steel bar or a wire rod is an important factor. If the heating temperature is less than 1050° C., the sulfides do not disperse finely, so that the lubricating action during cutting work is poor. This facilitates tool wear, and shortens the tool life. The heating temperature of the billet is therefore 1050° C. or more. The heating temperature of the billet is more preferably 1080° C. or more. Although no upper limit is placed on the heating temperature of the billet, the heating temperature is preferably 1250° C. or less from the viewpoint of suppressing a yield rate decrease caused by scale loss.


Area Reduction Rate in Hot Working: 75% or More


The area reduction rate when hot working the billet into a steel bar or a wire rod is also an important factor for sulfide refinement. If the area reduction rate is less than 75%, sulfide refinement is insufficient. Accordingly, the lower limit of the area reduction rate is 75%. The area reduction rate is more preferably 80% or more. The area reduction rate in the hot working can be calculated according to the following formula:





100×(S1−S2)/S1


where S1 is the cross-sectional area of a cross section perpendicular to the hot working direction of the billet before the hot working, and S2 is the cross-sectional area of a cross section perpendicular to the hot working direction (stretching direction) of the steel bar or wire rod produced as a result of the hot working.


By limiting the size and the heating temperature of the bloom, the size and the heating temperature of the billet, and the area reduction rates to the respective appropriate ranges, the sulfides can be refined and the machinability by cutting can be improved.


Examples

The presently disclosed technique will be described in detail below by way of examples.


Steels having the chemical compositions listed in Table 1 were cast into rectangular cast steels having the dimensions listed in Table 2-1 and Table 2-2 in a cross section perpendicular to the longitudinal direction, by a continuous casting machine. The obtained cast steels were rolled into steel bars under the production conditions listed in Table 2-1 and Table 2-2. Disclosed steels (conforming steels) and comparative steels were subjected to the following test. In detail, the cast steels were each hot rolled at the corresponding heating temperature and area reduction rate in Table 2-1 and Table 2-2, to obtain a square billet having the corresponding long side dimension and short side dimension in Table 2-1 and Table 2-2. The obtained billet was heated at the corresponding heating temperature in Table 2-1 and Table 2-2, and hot rolled into a steel bar having the corresponding diameter in Table 2-1 and Table 2-2. Each of the obtained steel bars (disclosed steels and comparative steels) was subjected to the following test.









TABLE 1







(mass %)




















No.
C
Si
Mn
P
S
Cr
Al
Sb
N
O
Others
A value*
Category























 1
0.05

0.67
0.072
0.412
0.80
0.001
0.0010
0.0110
0.0295

11.0
Conforming Example


 2
0.06
0.05
0.55
0.036
0.450
0.55
0.003
0.0040
0.0095
0.0245

6.1
Conforming Example


 3
0.08
0.02
1.25
0.065
0.356
1.25
0.002
0.0040
0.0123
0.0159

17.6
Conforming Example


 4
0.03
0.09
0.75
0.051
0.255
0.86
0.001

0.0105
0.0163

16.0
Conforming Example


 5
0.04
0.01
0.83
0.049
0.523
0.98
0.001

0.0088
0.0204

8.8
Conforming Example


 6
0.08

1.44
0.007
0.375
0.99
0.002
0.0010
0.0090
0.0288
Ca: 0.0005
15.6
Conforming Example


 7
0.05

0.86
0.055
0.406
1.23
0.002

0.0086
0.0369
Se: 0.12
13.3
Conforming Example


 8
0.07
0.02
0.55
0.082
0.324
0.76
0.002

0.0120
0.0234
Te: 0.15
10.4
Conforming Example


 9
0.06
0.06
1.45
0.091
0.554
1.16
0.002

0.0099
0.0254
Bi: 0.05, Sn: 0.010
11.5
Conforming Example


10
0.04
0.01
0.92
0.081
0.543
1.15
0.001
0.0102
0.0060
0.0265
Sb: 0.045
9.7
Conforming Example


11
0.07
0.02
1.05
0.065
0.368
1.15
0.002

0.0063
0.0316
B: 0.0035
15.1
Conforming Example


12
0.07
0.02
0.78
0.078
0.435
0.97
0.001

0.0077
0.0203
C: 0.25, Ni: 0.15
10.3
Conforming Example


13
0.06
0.03
1.44
0.075
0.366
1.11
0.001

0.0096
0.0314
TiO: 0.056
17.0
Conforming Example


14
0.05

0.76
0.068
0.370
0.54
0.003
0.0006
0.0089
0.0163
V: 0.008, Zr: 0.06
8.5
Conforming Example


15
0.06
0.02
1.24
0.074
0.399
1.23
0.001
0.0006
0.0123
0.0234
Mg: 0.0009
15.5
Conforming Example


16
0.05
0.01
0.78
0.008
0.399
0.99
0.003
0.0068
0.0040
0.0132

11.4
Conforming Example


17

0.09

0.01
0.85
0.055
0.403
0.95
0.003
0.0025
0.0088
0.0126

11.3
Comparative Example


18
0.08

0.51

1.15
0.016
0.435
0.88
0.001
0.0025
0.0123
0.0168

11.4
Comparative Example


19
0.08
0.02

0.45

0.045
0.352
0.56
0.002
0.0036
0.0098
0.0201

7.3
Comparative Example


20
0.05
0.01

2.13

0.060
0.301
0.55
0.003
0.0056
0.0076
0.0176

19.6
Comparative Example


21
0.09

0.84

0.120

0.406

0.25

0.001
0.0019
0.0089
0.0155

6.0
Comparative Example


22
0.08
0.01
0.75
0.096

0.241

0.65
0.001
0.0019
0.0112
0.0201

14.3
Comparative Example


23
0.07
0.02
0.53
0.012

0.611

1.09
0.002
0.0019
0.0098
0.0196

7.1
Comparative Example


24
0.05
0.01
1.36
0.003
0.352

0.04

0.003
0.0019
0.0053
0.0162

8.1
Comparative Example


25
0.07
0.02
0.94
0.065
0.463

1.59

0.001
0.0019
0.0123
0.0246

14.4
Comparative Example


26
0.05
0.01
1.00
0.013
0.349
1.06

0.013


0.0062
0.0222

14.8
Comparative Example


27
0.06

1.34
0.065
0.391
1.25
0.003
0.0068

0.0170

0.0116

16.4
Comparative Example


28
0.05
0.53
0.63
0.023
0.406
0.95
0.001
0.0088
0.0123

0.0091


10.1
Comparative Example


29
0.07
0.03
1.36
0.098
0.369
0.95
0.003
0.0088
0.0076

0.0523


15.1
Comparative Example


30
0.08
0.02
0.68
0.023
0.531
0.57
0.001
0.0088
0.0116
0.0165


5.8

Comparative Example


31
0.04

1.25
0.089
0.312
1.08
0.004
0.0088
0.0084
0.0203


18.4

Comparative Example





*Avalue = 2(Mn + 2Cr)/S ratio: conforming range (6.0 to 18.0).


“—” in composition table denotes less than 0.01 for Si, and less than 0.003 for Sb.






A test piece was collected from a cross section parallel to the rolling direction of the obtained steel bar, and the ¼ position in the radial direction from the peripheral surface of the cross section was observed with a scanning electron microscope (SEM) to investigate the equivalent circle diameter and number density of sulfide in the steel. Here, precipitate composition analysis was conducted by energy dispersive X-ray spectrometry (EDX). The obtained SEM images of precipitates determined as sulfide by EDX were analyzed and binarized to calculate the equivalent circle diameter and the number density.


The machinability by cutting was evaluated by an outer periphery turning test. BNC-34C5 produced by Citizen Machinery Co., Ltd. was used as a cutting machine, Carbide EX35 Tool TNGG160404R-N produced by Hitachi Tool Engineering, Ltd. was used as a turning tip, and DTGNR2020 produced by KYOCERA Corporation was used as a holder. As a lubricant, a 15-fold diluted emulsion of YUSHIROKEN FGE1010 produced by Yushiro Chemical Industry Co., Ltd. was used. The cutting conditions were cutting rate: 120 m/min, feed rate: 0.05 mm/rev, cut depth: 2.0 mm, and machining length: 10 m.


The machinability by cutting was evaluated based on the flank wear Vb of the tool after the end of the cutting test over a length of 10 m. In the case where the flank wear Vb after the end of the cutting test was 200 μm or less, the machinability by cutting was evaluated as “good”. In the case where the flank wear was more than 200 μm, the machinability by cutting was evaluated as “poor”.


The test results of the disclosed steels and the comparative steels are shown in Table 2-1 and Table 2-2. As is clear from Table 2-1 and Table 2-2, the disclosed steels had favorable machinability by cutting as compared with the comparative steels.























TABLE 2-1




















Properties of steelbar
















(inclusion distribution,
















machinability by cutting
















test result)





































Number



















Cast steel rolling (rolling cast steel into billet)
Linear rod rolling (rolling billet into steelbar)
density of
Number



























Long
Short








Area
sulfides of
density of






side of
side of


Area
Long
Short



reduction
less than
sulfides of






cross
cross


reduction
side of
side of



rate in
1 μm in
1 to 5 μm in






section
section
Cross-

rate in
cross
cross
Cross-


linear
equivalent
equivalent





Steel
of cast
of cast
sectional
Heating
cast steel
section
section
sectional
Heating
Steel bar
rod
circle
circle
Tool life




sample
steel
steel
area
temperature
rolling
of billet
of billet
area
temperature
diameter
rolling
diameter
diameter
(machinability



No.
No.
(mm)
(mm)
(mm2)
(° C.)
(%)
(mm)
(mm)
(mm2)
(° C.)
(mm)
(%)
(particles/mm2)
(particles/mm2)
by cutting)
Remarks





 1
 1
400
300
120000
1180
79
160
160
25600
1080
25
98
1273
2896
Good
Example


 2
 2
400
300
120000
1180
79
160
160
25600
1080
25
98
1011
2299
Good
Example


 3
 3
400
300
120000
1180
79
160
160
25600
1080
25
98
1817
4134
Good
Example


 4
 4
400
300
120000
1180
79
160
160
25600
1080
25
98
 810
2343
Good
Example


 5
 5
400
300
120000
1180
79
160
160
25600
1080
25
98
1986
4518
Good
Example


 6
 6
400
300
120000
1180
79
160
160
25600
1080
25
98
1746
3971
Good
Example


 7
 7
400
300
120000
1180
79
160
160
25600
1080
25
98
1835
4174
Good
Example


 8
 8
400
300
120000
1180
79
160
160
25600
1080
25
98
 913
2077
Good
Example


 9
 9
400
300
120000
1180
79
160
160
25600
1080
25
98
2843
6467
Good
Example


10
10
400
300
120000
1180
79
160
160
25600
1080
25
98
2380
5414
Good
Example


11
11
400
300
120000
1180
79
160
160
25600
1080
25
98
1678
3817
Good
Example


12
12
400
300
120000
1180
79
160
160
25600
1080
25
98
1611
3664
Good
Example


13
13
400
300
120000
1180
79
160
160
25600
1080
25
98
1823
4148
Good
Example


14
14
400
300
120000
1180
79
160
160
25600
1080
25
98
 927
2108
Good
Example


15
15
400
300
120000
1180
79
160
160
25600
1080
25
98
2009
4571
Good
Example


16
 1
420
350
147000
1180
83
160
160
25600
1080
25
98
1444
3001
Good
Example


17
 1
400
300
120000
1220
79
160
160
25600
1080
25
98
1564
3265
Good
Example


18
 1
400
300
120000
1180
84
140
140
19600
1080
25
97
1654
3269
Good
Example


19
 1
400
300
120000
1180
84
140
140
19600
1130
25
97
1312
2130
Good
Example


20
 1
400
300
120000
1180
84
140
140
19600
1080
15
99
1273
3356
Good
Example


21
 4
250
250
 62500
1120
60
158
158
24964
1050
89
75
 511
2021
Good
Example


22
16
400
300
120000
1180
79
160
160
25600
1080
30
97
1124
2558
Good
Example





*1 Underlines indicate outside applicable range.


*2 Number density of sulfides of less than l μm in equivalent circle diameter: conforming range (at least 500 particles/mm2).


*3 Number density of sulfides of 1 to 5 μm in equivalent circle diameter: conforming range (at least 2000 particles/mm2).


*4 Tool life (machinability by cutting) good: tool wear of 200 μm or less, poor: tool wear of more than 200 μm.
















TABLE 2-2










Linear rod rolling




Cast steel rolling (rolling cast steel into billet)
(rolling billet into steel bar)


















Long
Short



Long






side of
side of


Area
side of
Short





cross
cross


reduction
cross
side of





section
section
Cross-

rate in
section
cross
Cross-



Steel
of cast
of cast
sectional
Heating
cast steel
of
section
sectional



sample
steel
steel
area
temperature
rolling
billet
of billet
area


No.
No.
(mm)
(mm)
(mm2)
(° C.)
(%)
(mm)
(mm)
(mm2)





23
 1
257

240

 61680
1120
60
158
158
24964


24
 1

230


230

 52900
1180
52
160
160
25600


25
 1
400
300
120000

1100

79
160
160
25600


26
 1
250
250
 62500
1180

59

160
160
25600


27
 1
400
300
120000
1180
79
160
160
25600


28
 1
400
300
120000
1180
79
160
160
25600


29
17
400
300
120000
1180
79
160
160
25600


30
18
400
300
120000
1180
79
160
160
25600


31
19
400
300
120000
1180
79
160
160
25600


32
20
400
300
120000
1180
79
160
160
25600


33
21
400
300
120000
1180
79
160
160
25600


34
22
400
300
120000
1180
79
160
160
25600


35
23
400
300
120000
1180
79
160
160
25600


36
24
400
300
120000
1180
79
160
160
25600


37
25
400
300
120000
1180
79
160
160
25600


38
26
400
300
120000
1180
79
160
160
25600


39
27
400
300
120000
1180
79
160
160
25600


40
28
400
300
120000
1180
79
160
160
25600


41
29
400
300
120000
1180
79
160
160
25600


42
30
400
300
120000
1180
79
160
160
25600


43
31
400
300
120000
1180
79
160
160
25600





















Properties of steel bar (inclusion distribution,








machinability by cutting test result)
















Linear rod rolling
Number







(rolling billet into steel bar)
density of
Number





















Area
sulfides of
density of








reduction
less than
sulfides of








rate in
1 μm in
1 to 5 μm in








linear
equivalent
equivalent






Heating
Steel bar
rod
circle
circle
Tool life





temperature
diameter
rolling
diameter
diameter
(machinability




No.
(° C.)
(mm)
(%)
(particles/mm2)
(particles/mm2)
by cutting)
Remarks






23
1050
89
75
 483
2034
Poor
Comparative Example



24
1080
25
98
324

1804

Poor
Comparative Example



25
1080
25
98
 514

1589

Poor
Comparative Example



26
1080
25
98
 569

1756

Poor
Comparative Example



27

1030

25
98
1023

1465

Poor
Comparative Example



28
1080
95

72

468

1786

Poor
Comparative Example



29
1080
30
97
1131
2574
Poor
Comparative Example



30
1080
30
97
1292
2940
Poor
Comparative Example



31
1080
30
97
456

1114

Poor
Comparative Example



32
1080
30
97
356

1375

Poor
Comparative Example



33
1080
30
97
 756
2146
Poor
Comparative Example



34
1080
30
97
467

1805

Poor
Comparative Example



35
1080
30
97
444

1769

Poor
Comparative Example



36
1080
30
97
324

1657

Poor
Comparative Example



37
1080
30
97
1156
2146
Poor
Comparative Example



38
1080
30
97
1112
2529
Poor
Comparative Example



39
1080
30
97
1533
3487
Poor
Comparative Example



40
1080
30
97
1154
2179
Poor
Comparative Example



41
1080
30
97
1232
2217
Poor
Comparative Example



42
1080
30
97
430

1567

Poor
Comparative Example



43
1080
30
97
398

1765

Poor
Comparative Example





*1 Underlines indicate outside applicable range.


*2 Number density of sulfides of less than 1 μm in equivalent circle diameter: conforming range (at least 500 particles/mm2).


*3 Number density of sulfides of 1 to 5 μm in equivalent circle diameter: conforming range (at least 2000 particles/mm2).


*4 Tool life (machinability by cutting) good: tool wear of 200 μm or less, poor: tool wear of more than 200 μm





Claims
  • 1. A free-cutting steel comprising: a chemical composition that contains, in mass %,C: less than 0.09%,Mn: 0.50% to 1.50%,S: 0.250% to 0.600%,O: more than 0.0100% and 0.0500% or less, andCr: 0.50% to 1.50%,with a balance consisting of Fe and inevitable impurities, and in which a A value defined by the following formula (1) is 6.0 to 18.0, A value=2([Mn]+2[Cr])/[S]  (1)where [Mn], [Cr], and [S] respectively denote contents in mass % of elements Mn, Cr, and S; anda steel microstructure in which at least 500 particles/mm2 of sulfide of less than 1 μm in equivalent circle diameter and at least 2000 particles/mm2 of sulfide of 1 μm to 5 μm in equivalent circle diameter are distributed.
  • 2. The free-cutting steel according to claim 1, wherein the chemical composition further contains, in mass %, one or more selected from the group consisting of Si: 0.50% or less,P: 0.10% or less,Al: 0.010% or less, andN: 0.0150% or less.
  • 3. The free-cutting steel according to claim 1, wherein the chemical composition further contains, in mass %, one or more selected from the group consisting of Ca: 0.0010% or less,Se: 0.30% or less,Te: 0.15% or less,Bi: 0.20% or less,Sn: 0.020% or less,Sb: 0.025% or less,B: 0.010% or less,Cu: 0.50% or less,Ni: 0.50% or less,Ti: 0.100% or less,V: 0.20% or less,Zr: 0.050% or less, andMg: 0.0050% or less.
  • 4. A method of producing a free-cutting steel, the method comprising: rolling a rectangular cast steel at a heating temperature of 1120° C. or more and an area reduction rate of 60% or more to obtain a billet, the rectangular cast steel having a chemical composition that contains, in mass %,C: less than 0.09%,Mn: 0.50% to 1.50%,S: 0.250% to 0.600%,O: more than 0.010% and 0.050% or less, andCr: 0.50% to 1.50%with a balance consisting of Fe and inevitable impurities, and in which a A value defined by the following formula (1) is 6.0 to 18.0, A value=2([Mn]+2[Cr])/[S]  (1)where [Mn], [Cr], and [S] respectively denote contents in mass % of elements Mn, Cr, and S, and a side length of a cross section of the rectangular cast steel perpendicular to a longitudinal direction being 250 mm or more; andhot working the billet at a heating temperature of 1050° C. or more and an area reduction rate of 75% or more.
  • 5. The method of producing a free-cutting steel according to claim 4, wherein the chemical composition further contains, in mass %, one or more selected from the group consisting of Si: 0.50% or less,P: 0.10% or less,Al: 0.010% or less, andN: 0.0150% or less.
  • 6. The method of producing a free-cutting steel according to claim 4, wherein the chemical composition further contains, in mass %, one or more selected from the group consisting of Ca: 0.0010% or less,Se: 0.30% or less,Te: 0.15% or less,Bi: 0.20% or less,Sn: 0.020% or less,Sb: 0.025% or less,B: 0.010% or less,Cu: 0.50% or less,Ni: 0.50% or less,Ti: 0.100% or less,V: 0.20% or less,Zr: 0.050% or less, andMg: 0.0050% or less.
  • 7. The free-cutting steel according to claim 2, wherein the chemical composition further contains, in mass %, one or more selected from the group consisting of Ca: 0.0010% or less,Se: 0.30% or less,Te: 0.15% or less,Bi: 0.20% or less,Sn: 0.020% or less,Sb: 0.025% or less,B: 0.010% or less,Cu: 0.50% or less,Ni: 0.50% or less,Ti: 0.100% or less,V: 0.20% or less,Zr: 0.050% or less, andMg: 0.0050% or less.
  • 8. The method of producing a free-cutting steel according to claim 5, wherein the chemical composition further contains, in mass %, one or more selected from the group consisting of Ca: 0.0010% or less,Se: 0.30% or less,Te: 0.15% or less,Bi: 0.20% or less,Sn: 0.020% or less,Sb: 0.025% or less,B: 0.010% or less,Cu: 0.50% or less,Ni: 0.50% or less,Ti: 0.100% or less,V: 0.20% or less,Zr: 0.050% or less, andMg: 0.0050% or less.
Priority Claims (1)
Number Date Country Kind
2020-063741 Mar 2020 JP national
PCT Information
Filing Document Filing Date Country Kind
PCT/JP2021/014049 3/31/2021 WO