1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to apparatus for generating free radical species and particularly to hydroxyl free radical generators and methods of use in water treatment facilities.
2. Description of Related Art
The use of aquatic systems for use by the general public, for example, swimming pools, spas, hot tubs, decorative fountains, cooling towers and the like, has led to a variety of water quality problems. For instance, improper chemical balances in the water can lead to various types of contamination including bacterial and viral contamination. To address such problems, pool operators have turned to the use of chemical sanitizers as a typical water sanitation method. Halogen donor compounds, such as chlorine or bromine can be effective sanitizers so long as they are maintained at well-defined and constantly controlled concentration levels in the water. It is important that the concentration of these chemical sanitizers is not allowed to become too high and possibly cause irritation to the users and damage to the water system. Insufficient sanitizers may result in a contaminated condition. Other systems have been developed. For example, Ruffin in U.S. Pat. No. 3,079,498 discloses a swimming pool water purifier that provides germicidal ultra-violet radiation to a stream from and to the swimming pool.
Other efforts aimed at sanitization or treating aquatic systems have been disclosed. For example, Czulak et al., in U.S. Pat. No. 3,336,099, disclose an apparatus for the sanitization of liquids with special application to water storages and swimming pools by passing such a liquid from the swimming pool around an ultraviolet radiation source to expose the liquid to said radiation. Koubek, in U.S. Pat. No. 4,012,321, discloses oxidation of refractory organics in aqueous waste streams by hydrogen peroxide and ultraviolet light by introducing the liquid to be treated in a photolysis chamber, to expose the liquid to the ultraviolet light. Pisani, in U.S. Pat. No. 4,906,387, discloses a method for removing oxidizable contaminants in cooling water used in conjunction with a cooling tower by including means for removing a portion of the recirculating water which passes through the cooling tower to create a slipstream of water to be treated and treating the slipstream water with chemicals to provide a hydroxyl free radical into the water to enhance oxidation, inducing cavitation in the slipstream water, then irradiating the slipstream water with ultraviolet radiation to thereby cause the oxidizable contaminants to be oxidized and therefore removed before the slipstream water is reintroduced back into the cooling tower. Cater et al., in U.S. Pat. No. 5,043,080, disclose treating contaminated effluents and ground waters wherein the liquid effluent or ground water containing the organic contaminants is contacted with hydrogen peroxide and transition metal ions; the hydrogen peroxide and transition metal ions are present in effective amounts based on the concentration of the organic contaminants in the liquid and the liquid effluent is then irradiated with ultraviolet light to decompose the organic contaminants. Weres et al., in U.S. Pat. No. 5,439,577, disclose an electrochemical device for generating hydroxyl free radicals in the treated water using a novel electrode which is capable of operation at sufficiently positive anodic potential to produce the hydroxyl radicals in the treated water.
According to one embodiment, the present invention provides a water system comprising a body of water and a free radical generator comprising an inlet connectable to a substantially pure water source, a channel fluidly connected to the inlet, the channel disposed to flow the substantially pure water therethrough, an ultraviolet radiation emission source disposed to irradiate the substantially pure water and generate free radicals therein, and an outlet fluidly connected to the body of water.
According to another embodiment, the present invention provides a method of minimizing undesirable species in a water system. The method comprises providing substantially pure water to a free radical generator, irradiating the substantially pure water with ultraviolet radiation to produce a solution comprising free radicals, and adding the solution to the aquatic system.
According to another embodiment of the present invention, a method for disinfecting an aquatic system is provided. The method includes providing a low oxygen demand liquid to a hydroxyl free radical generator, irradiating the low oxygen demand liquid with actinic radiation to generate hydroxyl free radicals in the liquid, and adding the hydroxyl free radicals to the aquatic system.
According to another embodiment of the present invention, a method for facilitating treating a water facility is provided. The method includes providing a reactor comprising a water inlet fluidly connectable to a substantially pure water source, a channel fluidly connected to the inlet, the channel disposed to flow the substantially pure water therethrough, an ultraviolet radiation emission source disposed to irradiate the substantially pure water and generate hydroxyl free radicals therein and an outlet downstream of the ultraviolet radiation emission source, the outlet fluidly connectable to the water facility.
In another embodiment, the present invention provides a method of operating a water system. The method comprises the steps of providing a reactant solution consisting essentially of substantially pure water, irradiating the reactant solution with ultraviolet light to produce an oxidant solution having free radical species and mixing the oxidant solution with water in the water system.
In another embodiment, the present invention provides a water system. The water system comprises a reactant solution source providing reactant solution consisting essentially of water substantially free of free radical consuming contaminants and an ultraviolet radiation source fluidly connected to the reactant solution source and constructed and arranged to irradiate the reactant solution and fluidly connected to water in the water system.
Other advantages, novel features, and objects of the invention should become apparent from the following detailed description of the invention when considered in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, which are schematic and are not intended to be drawn to scale. In the figures, each identical or substantially similar component that is illustrated, is represented by a single numeral or notation. For clarity, not every component is labeled in every figure nor is every component shown where illustration is not necessary to allow those of ordinary skill in the art to understand the invention.
Preferred, non-limiting embodiments of the present invention will be described by way of example with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
The present invention, in one aspect provides an apparatus for generating free radical species can be used to sanitize or minimize undesirable species that create an oxygen demand in water systems. The apparatus generates hydroxyl free radical species using substantially pure water, or using a liquid that is substantially free of oxygen-reactive species, to maximize free radical species generation to sanitize the water system. The free radical species are generated by ultraviolet radiation having a wavelength of less than or equal to 254 nm.
According to one embodiment, the present invention provides a water or aquatic system as schematically illustrated in FIG. 1. The water system 10 can comprise a body of water 12 and a circulation system 14. Circulation system 14 typically includes a pump 16 and optionally an in-line filter 18 so that as water is withdrawn from body of water 12, it can be filtered as it passes through circulation system 14 before being returned to body of water 12. Optionally connected to circulation system 14 are sensor element 20 and connections or ports 22 and 24. In some cases, water system 10 can comprise body of water 12 fluidly connected to a free radical generator through, for example, port 22 or 24.
The hydroxyl free radical is one of the most powerful oxidizers. Because of its high oxidation potential, hydroxyl free radical species and other oxygen radicals, used herein as oxidants, can be used to oxidize oxidation-resistant compounds.
According to one embodiment, the present invention provides improved efficiency of oxidant production while utilizing comparably low power and relatively minimal capital and operating expense. The present invention can provide a method for improved control of oxidant concentration and delivery based on specific requirements and needs as well as measured program performance. In some cases, producing oxidants in an environment that is beneficial for their production would produce higher concentrations as well as improved efficiency. Accordingly, in one embodiment, the present invention provides an apparatus for generating free radical species as oxidants from a solution, typically the reactant solution, that is substantially free of a species that would oxidize such free radicals. For example, a reactant solution can be substantially pure water or it can be a solution that has a low chemical or biological oxygen demand level. By reducing the potential for competing reactions through the elimination of any unwanted or undesired organic or inorganic contaminants that may consume free radical species, the stability of such species is thereby improved. Thus, for example, the free radical generator apparatus according to some embodiments of the present invention has a low power consumption, such as about or less than 100 KW, in some cases, about or less than 10 KW and, in other cases, about or less than 1 KW for a water system that has about or greater than 10,000 gallons of water.
In another embodiment, the present invention provides a system, and a method, for employing and delivering an oxidant solution comprising free radical species, such as, but not limited to, hydroxyl free radical species (OH•), to a water system or a body of water to be treated using a free radical generator. The free radical generating apparatus, according to one embodiment of the present invention, is schematically illustrated in FIG. 4. The free radical generator 25 can have an inlet 26 and an outlet 28. Connecting the inlet and the outlet is typically a channel 30. Channel 30 can have a variety of shapes and configurations to allow the reactant solution to flow therethrough and, in some cases, maximize the incident exposure of the reactant to actinic radiation. For example, channel 30 can be shaped as a cylindrical or an annular chamber. According to one embodiment, within the chamber resides an actinic radiation source 32 contained within a transparent wall 34. The free radical generator can comprise a channel that fluidly connects to the inlet and is disposed to flow the reactant solution, such as substantially pure water, therethrough. The free radical generator can also comprise a source of actinic radiation that is disposed to irradiate the substantially pure water flowing along the channel such that upon irradiation, free radicals are generated therein. In some cases, outlet 28 of the free radical generator is fluidly connected to circulation system 14 at port 24. In some cases the actinic radiation source emits electromagnetic radiation in the ultraviolet range, preferably with a wavelength that is less than 300 nanometers and more preferably with a wavelength that is less than 254 nanometers. Examples of actinic radiation sources are available commercially from, for example, Aquionics Incorporated (Erlanger, Ky.). The intensity of the actinic radiation source can vary, typically, decreasing, after, a period of use. For example, the rated intensity or dosage of a specific ultraviolet lamp can decrease over time as described by Rodriguez et al. in “Disinfection, Liquid Purification by UV Radiation, and Its Many Applications,” Ultrapure Water, September 1991, pages 22-30. Typically, an ultraviolet lamp is rated according at its end of lamp life to insure minimum dosage levels. The present invention is not limited to a particular low or medium pressure lamp; thus, either or both may be used provided the lamp has sufficient intensity to initiate or generate the required free radical species yield.
Inlet 26, according to one embodiment, provides a reactant solution that is irradiated by the actinic radiation. According to some embodiments, the reactant solution has a low oxygen demand or processed to have a low oxygen demand. In some cases, the reactant solution comprises substantially pure water or a liquid that has a low chemical or biological oxygen demand. Outlet 28 can provide oxidant solution, which typically contains the produced free radical species for introduction into body of water 12.
Reactor sleeve or wall 34 typically encases or surrounds actinic radiation source 32 and separates it from the irradiated reactant solution and, typically, the oxidant solution. According to one embodiment, wall 34 comprises a quartz sleeve that is transparent to electromagnetic radiation having a wavelength of less than or equal to 300 nm. As shown in the embodiment of
According to another embodiment, wall 34 separates ultraviolet lamp 32 from the reactant solution while providing high transmittance of actinic radiation. Examples of suitable materials that can be used as wall 34 include, but are not limited to, natural or synthetic quartz because of its high transmittance of ultraviolet radiation.
The separation distance between sleeve 34 and surface 36 can vary between 0.1 mm to 100 mm. The volume enclosed within channel 30, along with the volumetric flow rate, defines the irradiation time or exposure time of the reactant solution to the actinic radiation. Free radical generator 25 can be constructed based on the required flow rate of the oxidant solution and the volume of channel 30, to have an irradiation time of about 1 second to about 100 seconds, and in some cases, with an irradiation time of between 2 to 20 seconds.
Surface 36 of channel 30 can be comprised of any material having suitable chemical and mechanical resistance to the reactant solution and oxidant solution. Such materials include, but are not limited to, titanium, stainless steel, copper, ceramic, plastic, or combinations thereof. In some cases, surface 36 can be coated to provide the appropriate or even selective chemical and ultraviolet resistance depending on use or other considerations such as, but not limited to, capital or maintenance costs. In other cases, surface 36 can be coated or prepared to have a reflective surface so that any radiation incident on surface 36 can be reflected back into the reactant solution. In other cases, surface 36 can have a coating that catalytically promotes free radical hydroxyl formation. For example, surface 36 can be coated with titanium dioxide. Those skilled in the art would recognize that channel 30 can be constructed or arranged to have surface 36 that exhibits a desirable combination of properties including, but not limited to being chemically stable, low cost, and catalytically active.
In operation, the generation of oxidant solution comprising free radical species, using free radical generator 25 and reactant solution, depends on several factors including, for example, the flow rate of reactant solution flowing within chamber 30, the intensity or power as well as the wavelength or wavelength spectrum of actinic radiation source 32 as well as the presence of free radical-consuming species present in the reactant solution, for example, the substantially pure water source (not shown). Other factors that may effect the concentration or the abundance of free radical species generated and available for use in system 10 include the presence of contaminating organic or inorganic species in, for example, the substantially pure water solution which can lead to, in some cases, undesirable competing reactions. In some cases, the reactant solution can be water that has been, for example, purified, such as by filtration, electrodeionization, electrodialysis, reverse osmosis, distillation, ion exchange, or combinations thereof. Further, the contact, residence or irradiation time of the reactant solution during exposure to the actinic radiation as well as the distance of photon travel, the number of photon collisions and the presence or absence of a catalyst within chamber 30 during the exposure to actinic radiation can affect the yield of the free radical species.
In another embodiment, the reactant solution is solution that has a low NTU value as well as having low total dissolved solids. Typically, the reactant solution has an NTU value below 100, or even less than 1. In other cases, the total dissolved solids content is typically below 2,000 ppm or even less than 100 ppm. Accordingly, in some embodiments, the composition of the reactant solution is conducive to provide stability to free radicals by having little or no species that would consume the produced free radical species. Further, survivability of such free radical species may depend on the pH of the reactant solution. Accordingly, the pH of the reactant solution is typically low or below about 10, or below about 9, or even below about 8.
According to another embodiment, the reactant solution further includes free radical donors that, for example, upon irradiation by the actinic radiation, can release, initiate or generate free radical species such as, but not limited to OH•. Examples of such donors include, but are not limited to, hydrogen peroxide, ozone, oxygen, singlet oxygen, other peroxide donors as well as peroxygen compounds. Typically, such donors would have a low level of dissolved solids when introduced into the reactant solution to minimize potentially undesirable competing reactions that can consume free radicals thereby affecting the yield of free radicals. For example, peroxygen compounds as peroxide donors that can increase dissolved solids that can react with the hydroxyl radical species include, but are not limited to, peroxodisulfate ions (S2O8−2) and hydrogen peroxomonosulfate (HSO5−). Such species can reduce the overall efficiency of free radical species production because they can consume generated free radicals. However, in some cases, salt-based reactants may be beneficial for other reasons. For example, using peroxide donors available in dry powder form may be more convenient for operational purposes even though their use may reduce the overall free radical yield.
In another embodiment, free radical generator 25 can be cooled during operation. For example, as shown in
In this example, the generation of hydroxyl free radicals and their effectiveness in oxidizing or minimizing undesirable contaminants as measured by, for example, COD, in a body of water was evaluated. Specifically, water system 10, schematically shown in FIG. 1. using the free radical generator 25, schematically shown in
During operation, several samples were retrieved from circulation system 14 as well as body of water 12 and evaluated for chloramine, measured as combined chlorine, as well as TOC to evaluate the effectiveness of the hydroxyl free radicals generator. Samples were retrieved and analyzed at sample point 42 from circulation system 14 approximately 3 to 5 feet before hydroxyl free radical introduction at port 24. Samples were retrieved and analyzed at sample point 44 approximately 3 to 5 feet after hydroxyl free radical introduction. Samples were retrieved and analyzed at sample point 46 approximately 8 to 10 feet after hydroxyl free radical introduction. And, samples were retrieved and analyzed at sample point 48 approximately 15 to 20 feet after hydroxyl free radical introduction. A nozzle was used in port 24 to introduce the oxidant solution having hydroxyl free radicals to accelerate the mixing of the oxidant solution from free radical generator 25 within the stream flowing in circulation system 14.
Those skilled in the art should appreciate that all parameters and configurations described herein are meant to be exemplary and that actual parameters and configurations will depend upon the specific application in which the systems and methods of the present invention are used. Those skilled in the art should recognize, or be able to ascertain, using no more than routine experimentation, many equivalents to the specific embodiments of the invention described herein. For example, those skilled in the art should recognize that multiple free radical generators can be used to treat a water system or that a plurality of free radical generators can be used, each having different or adjustable power ratings to compensate for, for example, wear or reduced yield with aging. It is, therefore, to be understood that the foregoing embodiments are presented by way of example only and that, within the scope of the appended claims and equivalents thereto, the invention may be practiced otherwise than as specifically described. For example, the reactant solution can be treated to have a low oxygen demand to remove free radical-consuming species. The present invention is directed to each feature, system, or method described herein. In addition, any combination of two or more features, systems or methods, if such features, systems or methods are not mutually inconsistent, is considered to be within the scope of the present invention.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008684 | Craddock | Jul 1935 | A |
| 2212260 | Brothman | Aug 1940 | A |
| 2249263 | Wheelwright, Jr. | Jul 1941 | A |
| 2268461 | Nichols | Dec 1941 | A |
| 2556014 | Tolman | Jun 1951 | A |
| 2651582 | Courtney | Sep 1953 | A |
| 2686110 | Carver | Aug 1954 | A |
| 2740696 | Longwell | Apr 1956 | A |
| 3252689 | Blomgren, Sr. et al. | May 1966 | A |
| 3319937 | Wilson | May 1967 | A |
| 3389970 | Scheibel | Jun 1968 | A |
| 3536646 | Hatch et al. | Oct 1970 | A |
| 3559959 | Davis et al. | Feb 1971 | A |
| T896051 | Hamlin et al. | Mar 1972 | I4 |
| 3702298 | Zsoldos et al. | Nov 1972 | A |
| 3742735 | Verreyne et al. | Jul 1973 | A |
| 3747899 | Latinen et al. | Jul 1973 | A |
| 3756570 | Bühner | Sep 1973 | A |
| 3794817 | Shinskey | Feb 1974 | A |
| 3852234 | Venema | Dec 1974 | A |
| 3870631 | Fassell et al. | Mar 1975 | A |
| 3965027 | Boffardi et al. | Jun 1976 | A |
| 4016078 | Clark | Apr 1977 | A |
| 4087360 | Faust et al. | May 1978 | A |
| 4113688 | Pearson | Sep 1978 | A |
| 4125574 | Kastner et al. | Nov 1978 | A |
| 4146676 | Saeman et al. | Mar 1979 | A |
| 4171166 | Trowbridge et al. | Oct 1979 | A |
| 4217145 | Gaddis | Aug 1980 | A |
| 4218147 | Rosenberger | Aug 1980 | A |
| 4233265 | Gasper | Nov 1980 | A |
| 4234440 | Hirozawa et al. | Nov 1980 | A |
| 4241016 | Hirozawa et al. | Dec 1980 | A |
| 4243636 | Shiraki et al. | Jan 1981 | A |
| 4300909 | Krumhansl | Nov 1981 | A |
| 4433701 | Cox et al. | Feb 1984 | A |
| 4456512 | Bieler et al. | Jun 1984 | A |
| 4470907 | Seneza | Sep 1984 | A |
| 4522502 | Brazelton | Jun 1985 | A |
| 4550011 | McCollum | Oct 1985 | A |
| 4575678 | Hladky | Mar 1986 | A |
| 4581074 | Mankina et al. | Apr 1986 | A |
| 4648043 | O'Leary | Mar 1987 | A |
| 4664528 | Rodgers et al. | May 1987 | A |
| 4701055 | Anderson | Oct 1987 | A |
| 4719252 | Dutton et al. | Jan 1988 | A |
| 4747978 | Loehr et al. | May 1988 | A |
| 4752740 | Steininger | Jun 1988 | A |
| 4913822 | Chen et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
| 4952376 | Peterson | Aug 1990 | A |
| 4965016 | Saitoh et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
| 4977292 | Hwa et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
| 4990260 | Pisani | Feb 1991 | A |
| 5000866 | Woyciesjes | Mar 1991 | A |
| 5004549 | Wood et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
| 5018871 | Brazelton et al. | May 1991 | A |
| 5030334 | Hale | Jul 1991 | A |
| 5061456 | Brazelton et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
| 5112521 | Mullins et al. | May 1992 | A |
| 5130033 | Thornhill | Jul 1992 | A |
| 5135968 | Brazelton et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
| 5139627 | Eden et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
| 5164429 | Brazelton et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
| 5213694 | Craig | May 1993 | A |
| 5230822 | Kamel et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
| 5236602 | Jackson | Aug 1993 | A |
| 5239257 | Muller et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
| 5256307 | Bachhofer et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
| 5262963 | Stana et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
| 5302356 | Shadman et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
| 5306355 | Lagana | Apr 1994 | A |
| 5306432 | Puetz | Apr 1994 | A |
| 5316031 | Brazelton et al. | May 1994 | A |
| 5320748 | Dupuis | Jun 1994 | A |
| 5332511 | Gay et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
| 5348665 | Schulte et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
| 5382367 | Zinkan et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
| 5422014 | Allen et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
| 5424032 | Christensen et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
| 5470480 | Gray et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
| 5489344 | Martin et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
| 5494588 | LaZonby et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
| 5518629 | Perez et al. | May 1996 | A |
| 5575920 | Freese et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
| 5587069 | Downey, Jr. | Dec 1996 | A |
| 5639476 | Oshlack et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
| 5658467 | LaZonby et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
| 5683654 | Dallmier et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
| 5736097 | Ono | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5770039 | Rigney et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5779912 | Gonzalez-Martin et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5783092 | Brown et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5785867 | LaZonby et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5800732 | Coughlin et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5814233 | Starkey et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5814247 | Derule et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5820256 | Morrison | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5849985 | Tieckelmann et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5855791 | Hays et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
| 5858246 | Rafter et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
| 5858249 | Higby | Jan 1999 | A |
| 5866013 | Kessler et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5882526 | Brown et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5888374 | Pope et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5895565 | Steininger et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
| 5902751 | Godec et al. | May 1999 | A |
| 5947596 | Dowd | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5972196 | Murphy et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5980758 | LaZonby et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5985155 | Maitland | Nov 1999 | A |
| 6015484 | Martinchek et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
| 6030842 | Peachy-Stoner | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6045706 | Morrison et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6068012 | Beardwood et al. | May 2000 | A |
| 6106770 | Ohki et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6120619 | Goudiakas et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6120698 | Rounds et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6132593 | Tan | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6143184 | Martin et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6146538 | Martin | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6149819 | Martin et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6159552 | Riman et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6238555 | Silveri et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6284144 | Itzhak | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6315950 | Harp et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6409926 | Martin | Jun 2002 | B1 |
| 6419817 | Martin | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6423234 | Martin | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6503464 | Miki et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
| 20020043650 | Martin | Apr 2002 | A1 |
| 20020152036 | Martin | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 262 139 | Nov 1988 | DD |
| 4 312 417 | Oct 1994 | DE |
| 0 257 740 | Mar 1988 | EP |
| 0 504 621 | Sep 1992 | EP |
| 2672058 | Jul 1992 | FR |
| 2281742 | Mar 1995 | GB |
| 11-33542 | Feb 1999 | JP |
| 11028479 | Feb 1999 | JP |
| 11-057752 | Mar 1999 | JP |
| 11-290878 | Oct 1999 | JP |
| 80951 | Feb 1979 | LU |
| WO 8908728 | Sep 1989 | WO |
| WO 9630307 | Oct 1996 | WO |
| WO 0034760 | Jun 2000 | WO |
| WO 0198558 | Dec 2001 | WO |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20030160004 A1 | Aug 2003 | US |