This disclosure relates generally to the field of optics, and in particular but not exclusively, relates to near-to-eye displays.
In the field of optics, a combiner is an optical apparatus that combines two images together, from either the same side of the combiner (reflective/reflective, or transmissive/transmissive) or from the two different sides of the combiner (reflective/transmissive). Often times, optical combiners are used in heads up displays (“HUDs”), sometimes referred to as head mounted displays (“HMDs”) or near-to-eye displays, which allow a user to view a computer generated image (“CGI”) superimposed over an external view. The HMD enables the user to view the CGI without having to look away from his usual viewpoint. The term HMD originated from its use in avionics, which enabled a pilot to view information while looking forward with his head up, as opposed to looking down at an instrument panel. Conventional HMDs include tilted dichroic plates, holographic combiners, angled transparent substrates, and compound conjugate lenses.
Two versions of combiners exist. The first version combines two fields without adding any lensing to either field (typically a tilted dichroic plate or compound conjugate lenses). The second version includes a lensing functionality, in addition to the combining functionality, which is usually an off-axis aspheric lensing for the field coming from the display. The lensing functionality is used to displace the virtual image originating from the display into the far field or at a specific distance from the combiner and to give the image a certain field of view to enable the user to bring the virtual image into focus at the target size.
Since near-to-eye displays by definition are worn close to the user's eyes, HMDs can physically interfere with conventional prescription corrective glasses. In some configurations, a HMD may be worn over prescription corrective glasses, but such configurations are often awkward and uncomfortable. Conventional near-to-eye displays are not well suited for use with users that require prescription corrective lenses, unless the user chooses to wear contact lenses. However, many people who need prescription corrective lenses choose not to wear contact lenses for a variety of reasons and are thus left with less than desirable options when wearing HMDs.
Non-limiting and non-exhaustive embodiments of the invention are described with reference to the following figures, wherein like reference numerals refer to like parts throughout the various views unless otherwise specified. The drawings are not necessarily to scale, emphasis instead being placed upon illustrating the principles being described.
Embodiments of a system, apparatus, and method of fabrication for a see-through near-to-eye display that incorporates a corrective eye prescription are described herein. In the following description numerous specific details are set forth to provide a thorough understanding of the embodiments. One skilled in the relevant art will recognize, however, that the techniques described herein can be practiced without one or more of the specific details, or with other methods, components, materials, etc. In other instances, well-known structures, materials, or operations are not shown or described in detail to avoid obscuring certain aspects.
Reference throughout this specification to “one embodiment” or “an embodiment” means that a particular feature, structure, or characteristic described in connection with the embodiment is included in at least one embodiment of the present invention. Thus, the appearances of the phrases “in one embodiment” or “in an embodiment” in various places throughout this specification are not necessarily all referring to the same embodiment. Furthermore, the particular features, structures, or characteristics may be combined in any suitable manner in one or more embodiments.
Integrating a corrective eye prescription into display 100 for users that do not wear contact lenses presents some challenges to do so in a cost effective manner that does not unduly add weight or otherwise sacrifice industrial design. For example, if a corrective lens 130 is positioned over just the external scene side of optical combiner 110, then image light 115 does not receive any prescriptive correction. Correspondingly, if a corrective lens 135 is positioned over the eye-ward side of optical combiner 110, then image light 115 traverses this lens twice compared to only a single traversal by external scene light 120, resulting in unequal prescriptive correction being applied to the two images.
The illustrated embodiment of display 200 includes prescriptive see-through eyepiece 201 and an image source 205. The illustrated embodiment of eyepiece 201 includes a meniscus lens body 210, having an eye-ward side 212 and an external scene side 214, and an optical combiner 215. The illustrated embodiment of image source 205 includes a display 220 and a lens 225.
During operation, image source 205 generates image light 230, which is a free-space projection onto eye-ward side 212 of eyepiece 201. In the illustrated embodiment, image light 230 is generated by display 220 and output through lens 225. Display 220 may be implemented using a variety of display technologies including a liquid crystal display (“LCD”), a liquid crystal on silicon (“LCoS”) display, a micro light emitting diode (“LED”) display, an organic LED (“OLED”), a pico-projector, or otherwise. Lens 225 may be included to provide magnification and/or collimation to image light 230. In some embodiment, lens 225 may also provide some additional prescriptive lensing. For example, a fixed number of lenses 225 (e.g., 5 different ones) may be manufactured and selected for use with user prescriptions that fall within fixed diopter ranges.
Image light 230 is incident into meniscus lens body 210 through eye-ward side 212. Eye-ward side 212 has a concave curvature that provides prescriptive lensing to image light 230 both upon entry into meniscus lens body 210 and exit out of meniscus lens body 210 after reflection from optical combiner 215.
Optical combiner 215 is disposed within meniscus lens body 210 between external scene side 214 and eye-ward side 212. Optical combiner 215 is a partially reflective and partially transmissive optical element that serves to both partially reflect display light 230 and partially transmit external scene light 235 in a manner that combines these two images into a combined image directed along an eye-ward direction towards a user's eye 240. Optical combiner 215 has two modes of operation. In reflection, optical combiner 215 imparts lensing power to image light 230. In transmission, optical combiner 215 imparts substantially no optical power to external scene light 235. Accordingly, optical combiner 215 along with the concave curvature of eye-ward side 212 of meniscus lens body 210 are collectively configured to impart prescriptive lensing to image light 230, while the convex curvature of the external scene side 214 and the concave curvature of eye-ward side 212 are collectively configured to impart the prescriptive lensing to external scene light 235. The optical power of optical combiner 215 in reflection takes into account the double pass of display light 230 across eye-ward side 212 to achieve the user's prescriptive lens. Since external scene side 214 is independent of the optical path of image light 230 and optical combiner 215 does not impart optical power in transmission to external scene light 235, this independence and decoupling between the optical paths of external scene light 235 and image light 230 provides sufficient design flexibility to provide appropriate user prescriptive lensing to the two separate optical paths.
Eyepiece 201 can be fabricated to correct for a range of prescriptions in a traditional meniscus lens form factor. For example, eyepiece 201 may be fabricated to have diopter correction ranging from −8 to +8. In one embodiment, meniscus lens body 210 may have a center thickness as narrow as 1.5 mm or more to accommodate optical combiner 215 while the edges can be less than 3 mm thick for eyepieces of 50 mm or less in width (W).
Eyepiece 201 is formed using a conventional meniscus lens form factor, thereby having a desirable industrial design for eyewear. Meniscus lens body 210 may be fabricated of glass, thermoplastic, resin, or other polymer materials using various fabrication techniques as disclosed below. In some embodiments, optical combiner 215 can be fabricated as a single generic element. In other embodiments, a limited number of different optical combiners 215 are fabricated corresponding to different diopter ranges. Since optical combiner 215 need not be specifically tailored on a per prescription basis, the fabrication techniques described below are amenable to mass fabrication.
Optical combiner 215 may be fabricated using a variety of different optical combiner technologies.
Alternatively, optical combiner 215 may be implemented using a plurality of serrated surfaces 405 (as illustrated in
In various embodiments, either the serrated surfaces of insert 410 and/or the serrated surfaces within recess 415 may be coated with a partially reflective coating to form the optical combiner functionality. Although
Eyepiece 401 is well-suited for implementing a head wearable display having a prescriptive see-through eyepiece that is amenable to high volume manufacturing techniques. In one embodiment, a limited number of generic meniscus lens bodies 425 may be fabricated each with a different base curvature for the eye-ward side 420. For example, less than eight generic meniscus lens bodies 425, each with a different base curvature for eye-ward side 420, may be fabricated to cover a range of diopters extending from −6 diopters to +4 diopters. In one embodiment, five generic meniscus lens bodies 425 having five different base curvatures for eye-ward side 420 may be adequate. While the eye-ward side 420 is selected from a fixed number of generic base curvatures that correspond to prescriptive diopter ranges, external scene side 430 can be machined (e.g., ground) on a per user basis according to their prescription. Furthermore, in some embodiments, a single generic optical combiner insert 410 may be sufficient for all or multiple generic base curvatures. In yet other embodiments, a limited number of inserts 410 may also be fabricated and each keyed to or selected based upon the user's prescription or the specific generic base curvature selected for meniscus lens body 425. Additionally, a limited number of temple optics (e.g., lens 225) may also be manufactured with each corresponding to a different base curvature and different insert 410. Furthermore, as illustrated below in connection with
By using a small number of generic base curvatures for the eye-ward side while custom machining the external scene side, the number of sku components for manufacturing is kept manageable while offering a prescriptive see-through eyepiece that is user specific. For example, to accommodate a −6 to +4 diopter range, five different meniscus lens bodies 425 each having a different base curvature for eye-ward side 420, along with five different inserts 410 each having different optical power and five different lenses 225 each corresponding to a different base curvature may be sufficient. The surfacing of the external scene side of the lens to fine tune distance vision to a specific user's prescription is achievable using conventional ophthalmic lab equipment since this surface is not used for display operation.
In a process block 505, a meniscus lens body 201 having the appropriate base curvature for eye-ward side 212 is selected according to the user's prescription. As mentioned above, meniscus lens body 201 may be fabricated by bonding a word side portion to an eye-side portion, in which case, selecting the appropriate meniscus lens body 201 includes selecting the appropriate eye-side portion. The selection is made from a limited number of options, such as five base curvature options to cover a diopter range of −6 to +4. Of course, other limited numbers (greater or smaller) of meniscus lens bodies 201 may be fabricated and other diopter ranges may be accommodated.
In a process block 510, the optical combiner 215 for insertion into meniscus lens body 210 is selected. In one embodiment, a single optical combiner 215 may be selected for all user's prescriptions. In other embodiments, a limited number of optical combiners 215 are fabricated with each one corresponding to a specific diopter sub-range or corresponding to the particular base curvature selected in process block 505.
In a process block 515, the selected optical combiner 215 is mated with the selected meniscus lens body 210 to form an optical puck. An optical puck is an unfinished version of eyepiece 201. After the optical puck is formed, external scene side 214 is machined to its final curvature based upon the user's specific prescription. Machining may be achieved via convention ophthalmic grinding (process block 520). In a process block 525, the optical puck is trimmed to fit a selected frame shape and integrated with the user's frame of choice (process block 530).
The prescriptive see-through eyepieces 901 are secured into an eye glass arrangement that can be worn on the head of a user. The left and right ear arms 910 and 915 rest over the user's ears while nose assembly 905 rests over the user's nose. The frame assembly is shaped and sized to position each optical combiner in front of a corresponding eye 240 of the user. Of course, other frame assemblies having other shapes may be used (e.g., a visor with ear arms and a nose bridge support, a single contiguous headset member, a headband, goggles type eyewear, etc.).
The illustrated embodiment of head wearable display 900 is capable of displaying an augmented reality to the user. Each prescriptive see-through eyepieces 901 permits the user to see a real world image via external scene light 235. Left and right (binocular embodiment) image light 230 may be generated by image sources 920 mounted to left and right ear arms 910 and 915. External scene light 235 is prescriptively corrected by the combination of the external scene side and eye-ward side while display light 230 is prescriptively corrected by the combination of the eye-ward side and optical combiner, and in some embodiments by image lenses 940 as well. Corrected image light 230 is seen by the user as a virtual image superimposed over corrected external scene light 235 as an augmented reality. In some embodiments, external scene light 235 may be partially blocked or selectively blocked to provide sun shading characteristics and increase the contrast of image light 230.
The binocular arrangement illustrated in
The above description of illustrated embodiments of the invention, including what is described in the Abstract, is not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the invention to the precise forms disclosed. While specific embodiments of, and examples for, the invention are described herein for illustrative purposes, various modifications are possible within the scope of the invention, as those skilled in the relevant art will recognize.
These modifications can be made to the invention in light of the above detailed description. The terms used in the following claims should not be construed to limit the invention to the specific embodiments disclosed in the specification. Rather, the scope of the invention is to be determined entirely by the following claims, which are to be construed in accordance with established doctrines of claim interpretation.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3936605 | Upton | Feb 1976 | A |
4799765 | Ferrer | Apr 1989 | A |
5050966 | Berman | Sep 1991 | A |
5191472 | Kurematsu et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5237455 | Bordo et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5537253 | Cox et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5654827 | Reichert | Aug 1997 | A |
5694230 | Welch | Dec 1997 | A |
5821911 | Jachimowicz | Oct 1998 | A |
5870224 | Saitoh et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5880888 | Schoenmakers et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5886822 | Spitzer | Mar 1999 | A |
5943171 | Budd et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5949583 | Rallison et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5995071 | Mertz | Nov 1999 | A |
6005714 | Welch | Dec 1999 | A |
6023372 | Spitzer et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6031662 | Miller et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6097543 | Rallison et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6147807 | Drossler et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6204975 | Watters et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6236509 | Grandjean et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6236511 | Brown | May 2001 | B1 |
6256149 | Rolfe | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6330118 | Daschner et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6349004 | Fischer et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6353503 | Spitzer | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6356392 | Spitzer | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6462882 | Chen et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6466471 | Bhattacharyya | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6690516 | Aritake et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6724354 | Spitzer et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6829095 | Amitai | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6847488 | Travis | Jan 2005 | B2 |
7095562 | Peng et al. | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7119965 | Rolland et al. | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7145726 | Giest | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7205960 | David | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7230766 | Rogers | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7450310 | McGuire | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7542209 | McGuire, Jr. et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7566863 | Chang et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7595480 | Kress | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7595933 | Tang | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7637617 | Liu et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7656585 | Powell et al. | Feb 2010 | B1 |
7715103 | Sprague et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7724442 | Amitai | May 2010 | B2 |
7821715 | Suzuki et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7895780 | Lee | Mar 2011 | B2 |
8382282 | Lytle | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8384999 | Crosby | Feb 2013 | B1 |
8917459 | Klein et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
9057826 | Gupta et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
20020034016 | Inoguchi et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020186179 | Knowles | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030058543 | Sheedy et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20060215244 | Yosha et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20070070859 | Hirayama | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070252954 | McGuire, Jr. et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080186547 | Shimizu et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20090067057 | Sprague et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090180194 | Yamaguchi et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090201589 | Freeman | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20100046075 | Powell | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100073579 | Okada et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100079356 | Hoellwarth | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100149073 | Chaum | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20110213664 | Osterhout et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110221656 | Haddick et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110261451 | Kwrk | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110261466 | Buch et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20120212399 | Border et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120293548 | Perez et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130107366 | Clarke | May 2013 | A1 |
20130229712 | Kress | Sep 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0 898 726 | Mar 2000 | EP |
0 995 145 | Sep 2001 | EP |
2002-090687 | Mar 2002 | JP |
2002 287077 | Oct 2002 | JP |
10-2007-0105657 | Oct 2007 | KR |
10-2011-0117581 | Oct 2011 | KR |
201516466 | May 2015 | TW |
WO 0079327 | Dec 2000 | WO |
WO 2007065995 | Jun 2007 | WO |
WO 2009153446 | Dec 2009 | WO |
WO 2010097439 | Sep 2010 | WO |
WO 2012003529 | Jan 2012 | WO |
WO 2012056817 | May 2012 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Kress, Bernard et al., “Low Cost Replicable Plastic HUD combiner element”, Photonics in the Transportation Industry: Auto to Aerospace II, Proc. SPIE vol. 7314, 73140I, Apr. 13, 2009, 8 pages, Orlando, Florida. |
Kress, Bernard et al., “Digital combiner achieves low cost and high reliability for head-up display applications”, SPIE Newsroom. DOI: 10.1117/2.1200904.1599, May 18, 2009, 3 pages. |
Kress, Bernard et al., “Applied Digital Optics: From Micro-optics to Nanophotonics, Chapter 5: Digital Diffractive Optics: Analytic Type”, 40 pages, 2009, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. |
Kress, Bernard et al., “Applied Digital Optics: From Micro-optics to Nanophotonics, Chapter 12: Digital Optics Fabrication Techniques”, 74 pages, 2009, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. |
Kress, Bernard et al., “Applied Digital Optics: From Micro-optics to Nanophotonics, Chapter 14: Replication Techniques for Digital Optics”, 27 pages, 2009, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. |
Kress, Bernard et al., “Applied Digital Optics: From Micro-optics to Nanophotonics, Chapter 16: Digital Optics Application Pools”, 60 pages, 2009, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. |
PCT/US2013/023251; PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, dated May 15, 2013, 9 pages. |
PCT/US2013/023251; PCT International Preliminary Report on Patentability, dated Sep. 12, 2014, 8 pages. |
PCT/US2014/010192; PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, dated Jun. 11, 2014, 11 pages. |
Kress, Bernard, “Sandwiched Diffractive Optical Combiner,” U.S. Appl. No. 13/411,346, filed Mar. 2, 2012, 30 pages. |
Saeedi, Ehsan et al., “Adjustable Lens Array With Variable Optical Power,” U.S. Appl. No. 13/742,201, filed Jan. 15, 2013, 28 pages. |
Adlens, “Emergensee,” Adlens Variable Focus Eyewear, www.adlens.com, 3 page brochure downloaded from Internet, Nov. 2012. |
Adlens, “Hemisphere Instant Prescription Eyeware,” Adlens Variable Focus Eyewear, www.adlens.com, 4 page brochure downloaded from Internet, Nov. 2012. |
Adlens, “John Lennon Collection,” Adlens Variable Focus Eyewear, www.adlens.com, 4 page brochure downloaded from Internet, Nov. 2012. |
PCT/US2016/056609—International Search Report and Written Opinion, dated Dec. 20, 2016, 12 pages. |
Allowance of Patent Application dated Apr. 23, 2018 for TW Patent Application No. 105134857, 9 pages. |
International Report on Patentability dated May 11, 2018 for PCT Application No. PCT/US2016/056609, 7 pages. |
Office Action (with Translation) dated Jan. 11, 2018 for Taiwan Application No. 105134857, 14 pages. |
Allsopp, Ashleigh, “Toshiba Glass Hands-on Review: Toshiba's First Smartglasses Aim to Take on Google Glass”, PC Advisor, Jan. 8, 2015, accessed on Aug. 6, 2015 at <<http://www.pcadvisor.eo.uk/review/wearable-tech/toshiba-glass-hands-on-review-3593254/>>; 5 pages. |
Intel, “New Wearables Face the Same Old Challenges”, Intel Free Press, Jul. 2, 2015; accessed on Aug. 6, 2015 at <<http://www.intelfreepress.com/reNs/wearables-computer-history-museum/9720/>>, 3 pages. |
Liang, Roger, “Glass, What Glass? Intel Snaps Up Swiss Eyeware Startup”, ZDNet, Jan. 21, 2015; accessed on Aug. 6, 2015 at <<http://wwwzdnet.com/article/glass-what-glass-intel-snaps-up-swiss-eyeNear-startup/ >>, 5 pages. |
Starner, Thad, “The Challenges of Wearable Computing: Part 1”, IEEE Mircro, vol. 21, Issue 4, Jul.-Aug. 2001; pp. 44-52. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170123207 A1 | May 2017 | US |