Free span building

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6286282
  • Patent Number
    6,286,282
  • Date Filed
    Wednesday, June 16, 1999
    25 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, September 11, 2001
    23 years ago
Abstract
A free span building has connector hubs having slots for mating with tubular frame members. Each slot has a longitudinal axis, and a tooth symmetrically disposed on either side of the longitudinal axis. The area of the slot in shear is larger than the area of the tubular frame member in tension by at least an approximate ratio of the strength of the material of the tubular frame member in tension to the strength of the material of the slot in shear. The angle between a bearing face of the tooth and the longitudinal axis is within the range of seventy to ninety degrees. The teeth are disposed on opposite sides of the longitudinal axis. A distance measured on the tubular member perpendicular to the longitudinal axis, and between the teeth, is at least the ratio of the yield strength to the ultimate strength of the material of the tubular member.
Description




BACKGROUND




The disclosures herein relate generally to free span buildings, that is, buildings with no intermediate vertical supports, and more particularly to the connector hubs used in the space frame construction of such buildings.




In space frame construction, a generally cylindrical connector hub includes a plurality of outwardly directed slots extending along the peripheral surface of the connector hub. The slots have opposed ribbed surfaces. Tubular frame members are flattened and crimped at their opposed ends. The crimped ends include elongated flat surfaces extending outwardly, or away from each other. The crimped ends are ribbed in a pattern which can be mated into engagement with the ribs in the connector hub slots. In this manner, each end of a tubular frame member may be slidably inserted into a respective connector hub slot, and several tubular frame members may be connected at one end to a connector hub slot to form a spider, i.e., a connector hub having a plurality of tubes extending outwardly therefrom, each tube terminating at a free end.




The free end of each tube can be similarly connected to another connector hub. Thus, a framework of interconnected spiders formed of tubes and connector hubs can be joined to form a pre-assembled or modular section of a flat roof, a domed roof, a wall, etc., to be joined with other sections to eventually form a complete structure. The structure once completed is then covered with a selected cladding which is attached to the structural framework by means of an interfacing cladding support system.




The cladding may be fabric, corrugated metal sheets, glass, or other selected materials, and may include combinations of these materials for architectural design purposes.




It is important that each end of a tubular frame member be slidably inserted by hand into a respective connector hub slot, so that an entire building may be constructed without special equipment, and with unskilled labor. Prior art designs of connector hub slots do not account for the “flash” (a small fragment of metal) which the manufacturing process leaves at the flattened, crimped ends of the tubular frame members. Thus, often the persons assembling the space frame construction are unable to insert the end of a tubular frame member into a connector hub slot without using hammers and excessive force, or without first grinding off the extra fragment of metal at the ends of each tubular frame member.




Another problem with prior art designs is that load stresses cause the connector slot to open up and loose engagement of one or more teeth before the load reaches substantially the yield strength of the tube, resulting in non-ductile failure and reduced strength.




Another problem with prior art designs is that no account is made of differing material properties that may exist between the tubular member material and the connector material, again resulting in failure of one of these before the tube reaches substantially the yield strength of the tube, resulting in non-ductile failure and reduced strength.




What is needed is a connector hub slot that can accommodate the flash, and which will not release a tubular frame member before the load stresses reach at least 100% of the tubular frame member's load capacity as measured by its rated minimum yield strength times its area. Also, what is needed is an elongated tube end and connector slot combination that will produce ductile failure under tensile stresses.




SUMMARY




One embodiment, accordingly, provides a free span building that has connector hubs having slots for mating with frame members. Each slot has a longitudinal axis, and at least one tooth symmetrically disposed on either side of the longitudinal axis. The area of the connector hub in shear is larger than the area of the frame members in tension by at least an approximate ratio of the unit strength of the material of the frame members in tension to the unit strength of the material of the slot in shear.




Advantageously, the area of the connector material in shear is to the area of the elongated member in shear as an approximate ratio of the unit strength of the material of the elongated member in shear to the strength of the material of the connector in shear. The area of the connector material in shear is computed at the more critical slip plane of initial plastic failure for the connector material. An indentation is provided at the tip of the slot to receive the flash at the tip of the tube without causing material interference when the end of the elongated member is slidably inserted into the connector slot. The angle between a bearing face of the tooth and the longitudinal axis is within the range of 65 to 90 degrees. The teeth are disposed on opposite sides of the longitudinal axis. A distance perpendicular to the longitudinal axis, and between the teeth, is at least seventy percent of the throat length at the open end of the slot.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING FIGURES





FIG. 1

is a view including an enlarged Detail A illustrating an embodiment of a free span building using connector hubs and tubular frame members.





FIG. 2

is a isometric view illustrating an embodiment of a connector hub.





FIG. 3

is a isometric view illustrating an embodiment of a portion of a connector hub connected to a tubular support member.





FIG. 4

is a plan view illustrating an embodiment of an end of a tubular support member inserted into a slot of a connector hub.











DETAILED DESCRIPTION




Referring now to

FIG. 1

, a clear span building


10


uses many connector hubs


12


connected to tubular frame members


14


, to form the sides or the top, or roof, or both of a free-form building, having no intermediate vertical supports. The connector hubs


12


are made of AA 6000 series aluminum alloy, or similar material. The tubular frame members


14


are made of A500Grb or similar steel.




Referring now to

FIG. 2

, the connector hub


12


includes a plurality of slots


20


into which the ends of the tubular frame members insert. The slots


20


are formed to extend axially along a peripheral surface


22


of the connector hub


12


. The slots


20


are keyed with a plurality of slot teeth


24


on a pair of opposed slot sides


20




a


and


20




b


which face inwardly or toward each other. The connector hub


12


may be of a shape other than cylindrical. The slots


20


may also be outwardly directed without being radially directed.




Referring now to

FIG. 3

, a tubular support member


32


slides into each slot


20


, and the slot


20


retains it in the following manner. Opposite ends


34


of the tubular support member


32


are flattened, and have several outwardly facing tube teeth


36


crimped into the ends


34


, for mating engagement with the slot teeth


24


. When the clear span building


10


is complete, and in service, many of the forces on the tubular support members


32


are tension forces, trying to pull the ends


34


out of the slots


20


.




In order to retain tubular structural members


32


in the connector hub


12


, a bolt


150


, and a nut


51


are provided for extending through an axially extending bore


28


. A pair of end plates or washers


52


are maintained in abutment with opposed ends


54




a


,


54




b


of the connector hub


12


by bolt


150


and nut


51


. This captures the ends


34


within the slots


20


.




Referring now to

FIG. 4

, the slot


20


and the end


34


share a common longitudinal axis


50


. The slot teeth


24




a


and


24




b


, and the tube teeth


36




a


and


36




b


are symmetrically or asymmetrically disposed on either side of the longitudinal axis


50


. For either side of the longitudinal axis


50


, the area of the slot


20


in shear would appear to be proportional to the sum of distances


52


and


54


. However, the slot tooth


24




b


has an initial slip plane distance


55


that is actually the portion of the slot tooth


24




b


in shear. The initial slip plane distance


55


has a length that is approximately half the length of the distance


54


.




The area of the end


34


in tension is proportional to a throat width


56


. The throat width


56


is determined by making it at least the ratio of the yield strength to the ultimate strength of the tubular members material. In the case of A500Grb steel, this would be 70%. The seventy percent standard is used because the typical ratio of yielding strength of the steel, 42 ksi, divided by the ultimate strength of the steel, 60 ksi, is seventy percent. And though there is work-hardening in fabrication, keeping this ratio as minimum assures yield failure in gross section before ultimate failure in the reduced section of the elongated member, resulting in ductile behavior.




The yield strength of the steel in the region between the slot teeth


24




a


and


24




b


is increased by work-hardening, thus allowing a further reduction in that area, without a decrease in the strength of the steel.




The sum of the distances


52


and


55


is approximately 2.5 times larger than one-half of the throat width


56


, which ratio is the approximate ratio of the strength of the steel of the tubular frame member


14


in tension to the strength of the aluminum of the connector hub


12


in shear. In an alternate embodiment, the slot


20


and the end


34


include only the slot teeth


24




a


and the tube teeth


36




a


. In the alternate embodiment, the distance


52


(proportional to the area of the aluminum in shear) is more than three times a one-half throat width


58


.




Thus, for example,









A500Grb





steel

-
tension
-
strength



6061





T6





aluminum

-
shear
-
strength


=


60
24

=
2.5











The tube teeth


36




b


have a bearing face


60


. The angle


62


between the bearing face


60


and the longitudinal axis


50


is approximately seventy-five degrees. The gap, or tolerance, between the slot


20


and the end


34


is greater in the length than the width. Thus, a length tolerance


70


is greater than a width tolerance


72


. In addition to the length tolerance


70


, the slot


20


also has, at its closed end, a tip indentation


74


to accommodate the flash which is left on the end


34


in the flattening process. Also, a tolerance


76


between the slot teeth


24




b


and the tube teeth


36




b


is less than a tolerance


78


between the slot teeth


24




a


and the tube teeth


36




a


. The purpose of this difference in tolerance is so that when the tubular frame member


14


, and thus the end


34


, is in tension, the slot teeth


24




b


and the tube teeth


36




b


engage before the slot teeth


24




a


and the tube teeth


36




a


engage. By so doing, the tension load is better spread through the end


34


.




Although illustrative embodiments have been described, a wide range of modification, change, and substitution is contemplated in the foregoing disclosure. In some instances, some features of the embodiments may be employed without a corresponding use of other features. Accordingly, it is appropriate that the appended claims be construed broadly, and in a manner consistent with the scope of the embodiments disclosed herein.



Claims
  • 1. A free span building comprising:a plurality of tubular frame members; a plurality of connector hubs, each hub having slots mated with the tubular frame members, each slot including: a longitudinal axis; at least one slot tooth disposed on either side of the longitudinal axis; at least one support tooth on opposite sides of each tubular frame member; and each support tooth having a bearing face defining an angle with the longitudinal axis, the angle being from about 65 degrees to about 90 degrees.
  • 2. The free span building of claim 1 wherein each slot further comprises a tip indentation.
  • 3. The free span building of claim 1 wherein each tubular frame member includes a substantially flat end including the at least one support tooth on opposite sides thereof.
  • 4. The free span building of claim 3 wherein an area of the tubular frame member in tension has been subjected to work hardening.
  • 5. The free span building of claim 1 wherein each tubular frame member has a wall thickness, and each slot further comprises:an open end; and a closed end; wherein a throat length at the open end is about twice the wall thickness of the tubular frame member.
  • 6. A free span building comprising:a plurality of tubular frame members; a plurality of connector hubs, each hub having slots mated with the tubular frame members, each slot including: a longitudinal axis; at least one slot tooth disposed on either side of the longitudinal axis; a substantially flat end on each tubular frame member; at least one support tooth on opposite sides of each flat end; and each support tooth having a bearing face defining an angle with the longitudinal axis, the angle being substantially 75 degrees.
  • 7. The free span building of claim 6 wherein a length tolerance between the tubular frame member and the slot is greater than a width tolerance between the tubular frame member and the slot.
  • 8. The free span building of claim 6 wherein each slot further comprises a tip indentation.
  • 9. The free span building of claim 6 wherein an area of the tubular frame member in tension has been subjected to work hardening.
US Referenced Citations (20)
Number Name Date Kind
2895753 Fentiman Jul 1959
2916109 Fentiman Dec 1959
2931467 Fentiman Apr 1960
2964147 Fentiman Dec 1960
2976968 Fentiman Mar 1961
3079681 Fentiman Mar 1963
3081601 Fentiman Mar 1963
3152819 Fentiman Oct 1964
3275351 Fentiman Sep 1966
3309121 Fentiman Mar 1967
4322176 Johnson, Jr. Mar 1982
5356234 Vangool Oct 1994
5483780 Stumpf Jan 1996
5802798 Martens Sep 1998
5867961 Castano Feb 1999
5924258 Castano Jul 1999
5946546 Castano Oct 1999
5996288 Aiken Dec 1999
6009914 Castano Jan 2000
B1 6192634 Lopez Feb 2001