Patent Grant
9055104
The Compact Disc Appendix, which was filed with application Ser. No. 10/413,256, includes two copies of a recordable Compact Disc (CD-R) containing information that is part of the disclosure of the present patent document. A portion of the disclosure of this patent document contains material that is subject to copyright protection. All the material on the Compact Disc is hereby expressly incorporated by reference into the present application. The copyright owner of that material has no objection to the facsimile reproduction by anyone of the patent document or the patent disclosure, as it appears in the patent and Trademark Office patent files or records, but otherwise reserves all copyright rights.
The present invention relates to computer and other networking, particularly devices that can communicate over a network using Transport Control Protocol (TCP) over Internet Protocol (IP). Recent advances in this area include intelligent network interface hardware and software that has been developed by Alacritech, Inc. to work with a host computer. Detailed descriptions of such advances, as well as relevant claims, can be found in U.S. Pat. No. 6,226,680, U.S. Pat. No. 6,226,680, U.S. Pat. No. 6,247,060, U.S. Pat. No. 6,334,153, U.S. Pat. No. 6,389,479, U.S. Pat. No. 6,393,487, U.S. Pat. No. 6,427,171, U.S. Pat. No. 6,427,173, U.S. Pat. No. 6,434,620 and U.S. Pat. No. 6,470,415, which are incorporated by reference herein.
For example, in one embodiment multiple TCP connections can be passed from a host computer to an intelligent network interface card (INIC) that is coupled to the host computer, offloading the TCP processing from the host to the card for these connections. A host can be a computer that acts as a source of information or signals. The term can refer to almost any kind of computer, from a centralized mainframe that is a host to its terminals, to a server that is host to its clients, to a desktop PC that is host to its peripherals. In network architectures, a client station (user's machine) may be considered a host, and an adapter that terminates TCP may also be considered a host, because each is a source of information to the network in contrast to a device such as a router or switch that merely directs traffic at the IP level.
For an INIC to be cost-effective, its processing power and memory capacity may be less than that of the host computer, although the INIC may also be more efficient than the host at certain tasks. TCP protocol guarantees reliable delivery of data, however, requiring thousands of lines of instruction code to ensure that the data is accurately and completely transferred over the network from a source in one host to a destination in another host. For this reason, the host may establish the TCP connections and retain a fallback capability for error handling of messages that are otherwise processed by a fast-path provided by the INIC.
One way that TCP guarantees delivery of data is through the use of acknowledgments (ACKs) and the sequenced delivery of the data. That is, after data has been sent in sequential packets, ACKs are returned from the receiving host indicating that all bytes up to a certain sequence number have been received. As shown in the prior art diagram of
Upon receiving an ACK 26 for all the transmitted data, the INIC sends a command complete 28 to the local host indicating that the transmit command has been completed by the transport function of the INIC, and an upper layer such as a session layer of the host is informed that its request to transmit data has been completed. For the case in which an ACK is not received by the INIC within a predetermined time after the corresponding packets were sent, indicating an error condition, the TCP connection is flushed 40 from the INIC to the host. The host can then retransmit 44 some or all of the unacknowledged packets.
It was discovered by the present inventors that waiting for ACKs to be received by an interface device for a host computer before signaling to the host that transmit commands have been completed can cause delays in transmitting data. In one embodiment of the present disclosure this problem is solved by sending, from the device to the host, a signal that the data has been sent from the device to the network, prior to receiving, by the device from the network, an ACK that all the data has been received. This brief summary does not purport to define the invention, which is instead defined in the claims below.
After all the packets have been transmitted onto the network, the interface device sends a signal 130 to the host computer that the data or packets have been transmitted. The signal may be known as a command response, and may be triggered by the host sending to the interface device another command to transmit additional data corresponding to the TCP connection 128. The command response includes an indication of how much, if any, of the transmitted data has been acknowledged (ACKed) by the remote host. An indication that the interface device has received an ACK for a previous command may also be sent with or piggybacked on the command response.
For the specific example in which up to three transmit commands per connection (actually pointers to three commands) can be simultaneously stored on the interface device, when the host passes a third command to the card, the interface device will complete the first command back to the host as long as all the data for the first command has been sent. There may or may not be ACKed data in that command response, which is indicated in the SND_UNA (send unacknowledged) value. The SND_UNA value provides the sequence number beyond which the remote host has not acknowledged receipt of the data.
Upon receiving the signal that the data was sent, the host can send a yet another command to the interface device to transmit additional data. Relieving the interface device from the duty of maintaining the command until all the data for the command has been ACKed frees memory space on the interface device for storing another command, allowing the interface device to transmit more data. This is particularly useful for the situation in which the interface device has a limited amount of memory for storing commands, and that memory amount is exceeded by the outstanding commands for which an ACK has not yet been received.
The host then waits to receive from the interface device an indication that the ACK for the transmitted packets has been received 132. If the ACK indication is received, the host transport function marks the send command as having completed 134 and tells the layer that requested the command, typically a session or application layer, that its request to transmit the data corresponding to the command has been successfully completed. If the ACK is not received by the interface device within a predetermined time period, the interface device flushes the connection from the interface device to the host 136, and the host then retransmits the packets 138 for which an ACK was not received.
In one embodiment, the interface device caches thirty-two of the most active TCP connections in SRAM, while about four thousand TCP connections are maintained in DRAM. SRAM memory may be relatively expensive especially in terms of on-chip real estate, and therefore SRAM memory space may be relatively scarce. For each of the thirty-two active TCP connections in this embodiment, pointers to (also known as indications of) up to three transmit commands are stored: commands that have been sent, commands that are being sent, and commands that are to be sent. Once these three pointers or indications have been stored, that connection can not transmit any more data in this embodiment. Particularly for the situation in which a number of transmit commands are desired to be sent in a rapid sequence for a connection, waiting for an ACK to be returned corresponding to one of the commands can stall the transmission of data. This embodiment avoids that delay by freeing the SRAM that stores the command pointers or indications once the data has been sent and typically prior to receiving an ACK for all that data, while sending a signal to the host that the data has been sent.
The host can maintain in its short term memory a table of ACK values for each connection in host memory, the host memory typically being many times larger the SRAM on the interface device, so that delays in data transmission due to interface device waiting for commands to be ACKed are reduced. The host then is responsible for completing the command when the corresponding ACK indication has arrived at the host. The host can determine completion of the commands simply by calculating the sequence number for the last byte of data for a command, using the data length associated with the command and the starting sequence number of the command (or the ending sequence number of the prior command). This sequence number is compared with a SND_UNA field in each command response, thereby determining whether the command is completed. Completing the command includes providing by the transport layer, typically TCP, an indication to an upper layer such as a session layer or application layer, that the data associated with the command has been ACKed by the remote host.
The host then sends a second command 224 to the interface device to transmit additional data associated with the network connection. The interface device, upon receiving the second command from the host, determines whether the memory space for holding pointers to transmit commands for this connection is full. If not 228, the interface device continues to wait for ACKs associated with the first command to be returned to send a command complete response to the host 230. If, on the other hand, the interface device determines that the memory space for holding transmit command pointers is now full 232, the interface device sends a response to the first command indicating that the data associated with the first command has been sent. This command response includes an indication of how much, if any, of the transmitted data has been ACKed by the remote host 234. One should note that the interface device may make the determination of whether the memory space for holding pointers to transmit commands for the connection is full upon receiving a third command, fourth command or other subsequent command, instead of upon receiving the second command.
For the case in which the interface device waits for ACKs associated with the first command to be returned to send a command complete response to the host 230, upon receiving an ACK indicating that all the data has been received 238, the interface device then sends a command complete response to the host 240. Should the interface device not receive such an ACK within a predetermined time period 242, indicating an error condition, control of the connection is flushed from the interface device to the host 244. The host may then attempt to retransmit 246 the data corresponding to the first command.
For the case in which the interface device has sent a response to the first command indicating that the data associated with the first command has been transmitted, the interface device can send an indication to the host when a corresponding ACK has been received 248. Upon receiving an indication from the interface device that all the data corresponding to the first command has been received, the host then completes the first command 250 by indicating to a layer above the transport layer that the data associated with the first command has been received. Should the interface device not receive such an ACK within a predetermined time period 242, indicating an error condition, control of the connection is flushed from the interface device to the host 244. The host may then attempt to retransmit 246 the data corresponding to the first command.
Alternatively, the SND_UNA value can be provided with each command response, making unnecessary a separate indication that all the data corresponding to a command has been ACKed. The indication that all the data for a command has been ACKed may be piggybacked with a command response indicating that all the data for a subsequent command has been transmitted, or with a command response indicating that all the data for a subsequent command has been ACKed. Once the command count on the interface device is no longer full, the interface device reverts to completing commands to the host when an ACK for all the command data has been received.
For a connection that is flushed from the interface device to the host, the SND_UNA value in the latest command response, which can be provided as part of the flush mechanism, can be used by the host to determine the data of the command that the host needs to transmit.
In this embodiment commands to transmit data are completed by the interface device unless the interface memory for storing the transmit command pointers becomes full or nearly full, at which time the earliest outstanding command is sent to the host for completion. This mechanism has an advantage of maintaining a flow of command completions upon which to piggyback indications that ACKs have been received by the interface device. For an alternative embodiment that always sends a command response indicating data has been sent but not necessarily received, a situation may exist in which a command response may not be available for piggybacking an ACK indication, and that indication is sent in a separate communication from the host to the interface device.
Source code description of an embodiment of the present invention can be found in Provisional Patent Application No. 60/374,788, which is incorporated by reference herein. Also included with the present disclosure is a compact disc including host code and device microcode that describe in detail an embodiment of the present invention.
Although we have focused on teaching the preferred embodiments of an improved data communication system, other embodiments and modifications of this invention will be apparent to persons of ordinary skill in the art in view of these teachings. Therefore, this invention is limited only by the following claims, which include all such embodiments and modifications when viewed in conjunction with the above specification and accompanying drawings.
This application claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. §120 of (is a continuation of) U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/413,256, filed Apr. 14, 2003 now U.S. Pat. No. 7,543,087, entitled “Freeing Transmit Memory on a Network Interface Device Prior to Receiving An Acknowledgement that Transmit Data Has Been Received by a Remote Device,” which is incorporated by reference herein. This application also claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. §119(e) to Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/374,788, filed Apr. 22, 2002, entitled “TCP/IP Offload Device,” which is incorporated by reference herein.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4366538 | Johnson et al. | Dec 1982 | A |
| 4485455 | Boone et al. | Nov 1984 | A |
| 4485460 | Stambaugh | Nov 1984 | A |
| 4589063 | Shah et al. | May 1986 | A |
| 4700185 | Balph et al. | Oct 1987 | A |
| 4991133 | Davis et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
| 5056058 | Hirata et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
| 5058110 | Beach et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
| 5097442 | Ward et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
| 5129093 | Muramatsu et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
| 5163131 | Row et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
| 5212778 | Dally et al. | May 1993 | A |
| 5274768 | Traw et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
| 5280477 | Trapp | Jan 1994 | A |
| 5281963 | Ishikawa et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
| 5289580 | Latif et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
| 5303344 | Yokoyama et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
| 5412782 | Hausman et al. | May 1995 | A |
| 5418912 | Christenson | May 1995 | A |
| 5448566 | Richter et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
| 5485455 | Dobbins et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
| 5485460 | Schrier et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
| 5485579 | Hitz et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
| 5506966 | Ban | Apr 1996 | A |
| 5511169 | Suda | Apr 1996 | A |
| 5517668 | Szwerinski et al. | May 1996 | A |
| 5524250 | Chesson et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
| 5535375 | Eshel et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5548730 | Young et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
| 5553241 | Shirakihar | Sep 1996 | A |
| 5566170 | Bakke et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
| 5574919 | Netravali et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
| 5588121 | Reddin et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
| 5590328 | Seno et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
| 5592622 | Isfeld et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
| 5596574 | Perlman et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
| 5598410 | Stone | Jan 1997 | A |
| 5619650 | Bach et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
| 5629933 | Delp et al. | May 1997 | A |
| 5633780 | Cronin | May 1997 | A |
| 5634099 | Andrews et al. | May 1997 | A |
| 5634127 | Cloud et al. | May 1997 | A |
| 5642482 | Pardillos | Jun 1997 | A |
| 5664114 | Krech, Jr. et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
| 5671355 | Collins | Sep 1997 | A |
| 5678060 | Yokoyama et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
| 5682534 | Kapoor et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
| 5684954 | Kaiserswerth et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
| 5692130 | Shobu et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
| 5699317 | Sartore et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
| 5699350 | Kraslavsky | Dec 1997 | A |
| 5701434 | Nakagawa | Dec 1997 | A |
| 5701516 | Cheng et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
| 5706514 | Bonola | Jan 1998 | A |
| 5727142 | Chen | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5742765 | Wong et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5749095 | Hagersten | May 1998 | A |
| 5751715 | Chan et al. | May 1998 | A |
| 5751723 | Vanden Heuvel et al. | May 1998 | A |
| 5752078 | Delp et al. | May 1998 | A |
| 5758084 | Silverstein et al. | May 1998 | A |
| 5758089 | Gentry et al. | May 1998 | A |
| 5758186 | Hamilton et al. | May 1998 | A |
| 5758194 | Kuzma | May 1998 | A |
| 5768618 | Erickson et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5771349 | Picazo, Jr. et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5774660 | Brendel et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5778013 | Jedwab | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5778419 | Hansen et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5790804 | Osborne | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5794061 | Hansen et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5799150 | Hamilton et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5802258 | Chen | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5802580 | McAlpine | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5809328 | Nogales et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5809527 | Cooper et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5812775 | Van Seters et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5815646 | Purcell et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5819111 | Davies et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5828835 | Isfeld et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5848293 | Gentry et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5870394 | Oprea | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5872919 | Wakeland et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5878225 | Bilansky et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5878227 | Wade et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5892903 | Klaus | Apr 1999 | A |
| 5898713 | Melzer et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
| 5913028 | Wang et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
| 5915094 | Kouloheris et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
| 5917828 | Thompson | Jun 1999 | A |
| 5920566 | Hendel et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5926642 | Favor | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5930830 | Mendelson et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5931918 | Row et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5935205 | Murayama et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5935249 | Stern et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5937169 | Connery et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5941969 | Ram et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5941972 | Hoese et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5950203 | Stakuis et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5963876 | Manssen et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5970804 | Robbat, Jr. | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5978844 | Tsuchiya et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5987022 | Geiger et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5991299 | Radogna et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5996013 | Delp et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5996024 | Blumenau | Nov 1999 | A |
| 6005849 | Roach et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6009478 | Panner et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6014380 | Hendel et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
| 6014557 | Morton et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
| 6016513 | Lowe | Jan 2000 | A |
| 6021446 | Gentry et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6021507 | Chen | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6026452 | Pitts | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6034963 | Minami et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6038562 | Anjur et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6041058 | Flanders et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6041381 | Hoese | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6044438 | Olnowich | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6047323 | Krause | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6047356 | Anderson et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6049528 | Hendel et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6057863 | Olarig | May 2000 | A |
| 6061368 | Hitzelberger | May 2000 | A |
| 6065096 | Day et al. | May 2000 | A |
| 6067569 | Khaki et al. | May 2000 | A |
| 6070200 | Gates et al. | May 2000 | A |
| 6078564 | Lakshman et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6078733 | Osborne | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6097734 | Gotesman et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6101555 | Goshey et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6101590 | Hansen | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6111673 | Chang et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6115615 | Ota et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6122670 | Bennett et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6141701 | Whitney | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6141705 | Anand et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6145017 | Ghaffari | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6157944 | Pedersen | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6157955 | Narad et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6172980 | Flanders et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6173333 | Jolitz et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6181705 | Branstad et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6202105 | Gates et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
| 6219693 | Napolitano et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6223242 | Sheafor et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6226680 | Boucher et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6233242 | Mayer et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6243667 | Kerr et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6246683 | Connery et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6247060 | Boucher et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6279051 | Gates et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6289023 | Dowling et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6298403 | Suri et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6324649 | Eyres et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6334153 | Boucher et al. | Dec 2001 | B2 |
| 6343345 | Hilla et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
| 6343360 | Feinleib | Jan 2002 | B1 |
| 6345301 | Burns et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
| 6345302 | Bennett et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
| 6356951 | Gentry et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
| 6370599 | Anand et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6385647 | Willis et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6389468 | Muller et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6389479 | Boucher | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6393487 | Boucher et al. | May 2002 | B2 |
| 6418169 | Datari | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6421742 | Tillier | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6421753 | Hoese et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6427169 | Elzur | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6427171 | Craft et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6427173 | Boucher et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6434620 | Boucher et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6434651 | Gentry, Jr. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6449656 | Elzur et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6452915 | Jorgensen | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6453360 | Muller et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6453406 | Sarnikowski et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6470415 | Starr et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6473425 | Bellaton et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6480489 | Muller et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
| 6483804 | Muller et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
| 6487202 | Klausmeier et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
| 6487654 | Dowling | Nov 2002 | B2 |
| 6490631 | Teich et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
| 6502144 | Accarie | Dec 2002 | B1 |
| 6523119 | Pavlin et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
| 6526446 | Yang et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
| 6542504 | Mahler et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
| 6570884 | Connery et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
| 6591302 | Boucher et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
| 6591310 | Johnson | Jul 2003 | B1 |
| 6594261 | Boura et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
| 6631484 | Born | Oct 2003 | B1 |
| 6648611 | Morse et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
| 6650640 | Muller et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
| 6657757 | Chang et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
| 6658480 | Boucher et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
| 6678283 | Teplitsky | Jan 2004 | B1 |
| 6681364 | Calvignac et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
| 6683851 | Willkie et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
| 6687758 | Craft et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
| 6697366 | Kim | Feb 2004 | B1 |
| 6697868 | Craft et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
| 6751665 | Philbrick et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
| 6757746 | Boucher et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
| 6757767 | Kelleher | Jun 2004 | B1 |
| 6765901 | Johnson et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
| 6807581 | Starr et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
| 6842896 | Redding et al. | Jan 2005 | B1 |
| 6865264 | Berstis | Mar 2005 | B2 |
| 6912522 | Edgar | Jun 2005 | B2 |
| 6938092 | Burns | Aug 2005 | B2 |
| 6941386 | Craft et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
| 6965941 | Boucher et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
| 6976148 | Arimilli et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
| 6996070 | Starr et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
| 7016361 | Swonk et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
| 7042898 | Blightman et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7047320 | Arimilli et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7073196 | Dowd et al. | Jul 2006 | B1 |
| 7076568 | Philbrick et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
| 7089326 | Boucher et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
| 7093099 | Bodas et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
| 7124205 | Craft et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
| 7133940 | Blightman et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
| 7167926 | Boucher et al. | Jan 2007 | B1 |
| 7167927 | Philbrick et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
| 7174393 | Boucher et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
| 7181531 | Pinkerton et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
| 7185266 | Blightman et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
| 7187679 | Dally et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
| 7191241 | Boucher et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
| 7191318 | Tripathy et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
| 7237036 | Boucher et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
| 7254696 | Mittal et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
| 7260518 | Kerr et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
| 7283522 | Siddabathuni | Oct 2007 | B2 |
| 7284070 | Boucher et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
| 7287092 | Sharp | Oct 2007 | B2 |
| 7337241 | Boucher et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
| 7461160 | Boucher et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
| 7472156 | Philbrick et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
| 7496689 | Sharp et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
| 7502869 | Boucher et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
| 7519699 | Jain et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
| 7543087 | Philbrick et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
| 7584260 | Craft et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
| 7620726 | Craft et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
| 7627001 | Craft et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
| 7627684 | Boucher et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
| 7640364 | Craft et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
| 7664868 | Boucher et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
| 7664883 | Craft et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
| 7673072 | Boucher et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
| 7694024 | Philbrick et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
| 7738500 | Jones et al. | Jun 2010 | B1 |
| 20010004354 | Jolitz | Jun 2001 | A1 |
| 20010013059 | Dawson et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
| 20010014892 | Gaither et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
| 20010014954 | Purcell et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
| 20010025315 | Jolitz | Sep 2001 | A1 |
| 20010037406 | Philbrick et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
| 20010048681 | Bilic et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
| 20010053148 | Bilic et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
| 20020016851 | Border | Feb 2002 | A1 |
| 20020073223 | Darnell et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
| 20020112175 | Makofka et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020156927 | Boucher et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
| 20030014544 | Pettey | Jan 2003 | A1 |
| 20030046330 | Hayes | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030066011 | Oren | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20030067903 | Jorgensen | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20030110344 | Szczepanek et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030149715 | Ruutu et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
| 20030165160 | Minami et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20040010712 | Hui et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20040042458 | Elzu | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040042464 | Elzur et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040049580 | Boyd et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040049601 | Boyd et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040054814 | McDaniel | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040059926 | Angelo et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
| 20040088262 | Boucher et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040153578 | Elzur | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20040202166 | Dillon | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040210795 | Anderson | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040213290 | Johnson et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
| 20040246974 | Gyugyi et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20040249957 | Ekis et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20050060538 | Beverly | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20050144300 | Craft et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20060133386 | McCormack et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
| 20060248208 | Walbeck et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20070083682 | Bartley et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070140240 | Dally et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20080043732 | Desai et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080170501 | Patel et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080209084 | Wang et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
| 20080240111 | Gadelrab | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20090063696 | Wang et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| WO 9819412 | May 1998 | WO |
| WO 9850852 | Nov 1998 | WO |
| WO 9904343 | Jan 1999 | WO |
| WO 9965219 | Dec 1999 | WO |
| WO 0013091 | Mar 2000 | WO |
| WO 0104770 | Jan 2001 | WO |
| WO 0105107 | Jan 2001 | WO |
| WO 0105116 | Jan 2001 | WO |
| WO 0105123 | Jan 2001 | WO |
| WO 0140960 | Jun 2001 | WO |
| WO 0159966 | Aug 2001 | WO |
| WO 0186430 | Nov 2001 | WO |
| WO 2007130476 | Nov 2007 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| Internet pages entitled “Hardware Assisted Protocol Processing”, (which Eugene Feinber is working on), 1 page, printed Nov. 25, 1998. |
| Zilog product Brief entitled “Z85C30 CMOS SCC Serial Communication Controller”, Zilog Inc., 3 pages, 1997. |
| Internet pages of Xpoint Technologies, Inc. entitled “Smart LAN Work Requests”, 5 pages, printed Dec. 19, 1997. |
| Internet pages entitled: Asante and 100BASE-T Fast Ethernet. 7 pages, printed May 27, 1997. |
| Internet pages entitled: A Guide to the Paragon XP/S-A7 Supercomputer at Indiana University. 13 pages, printed Dec. 21, 1998. |
| Richard Stevens, “TCP/IP Illustrated, vol. 1, The Protocols”, pp. 325-326 (1994). |
| Internet pages entitled: Northridge/Southbridge vs. Intel Hub Architecture, 4 pages, printed Feb. 19, 2001. |
| Gigabit Ethernet Technical Brief, Achieving End-to-End Performance. Alteon Networks, Inc, First Edition, Sep. 1996, 15 pages. |
| Internet pages directed to Technical Brief on Alteon Ethernet Gigabit NIC technology, www.alteon.com, 14 pages, printed Mar. 15, 1997. |
| VIA Technologies, Inc. article entitled “VT8501 Apollo MVP4”, pp. i-iv, 1-11, cover and copyright page, revision 1.3, Feb. 1, 2000. |
| iReady News Archives article entitled “iReady Rounding Out Management Team with Two Key Executives”, http://www.ireadyco.com/archives/keyexec.html, 2 pages, printed Nov. 28, 1998. |
| “Toshiba Delivers First Chips to Make Consumer Devices Internet-Ready Based on iReady's Design,” Press Release Oct. 1998, 3 pages, printed Nov. 28, 1998. |
| Internet pages from iReady Products, web sitehttp://www.ireadyco.com/products,html, 2 pages, downloaded Nov. 25, 1998. |
| iReady News Archives, Toshiba, iReady shipping Internet chip, 1 page, printed Nov. 25, 1998. |
| Interprophet article entitled “Technology”, http://www.interprophet.com/technology.html, 17 pages, printed Mar. 1, 2000. |
| iReady Corporation, article entitled “The I-1000 Internet Tuner”, 2 pages, date unknown. |
| iReady article entitled “About Us Introduction”, Internet pages fromhttp://www.iReadyco.com/about.html, 3 pages, printed Nov. 25, 1998. |
| iReady News Archive article entitled “Revolutionary Approach, to Consumer Electronics Internet Connectivity Funded”, San Jose, CA, Nov. 20, 1997. 2 pages, printed Nov. 2, 1998. |
| iReady News Archive article entitled “Seiko Instruments Inc. (SII) Introduces World's First Internet-Ready Intelligent LCD Modules Based on iReady Technology,” Santa Clara, CA and Chiba, Japan, Oct. 26, 1998. 2 pages, printed Nov. 2, 1998. |
| NEWSwatch article entitled “iReady internet Tuner to Web Enable Devices”, Tuesday, Nov. 5, 1996, printed Nov. 2, 1998, 2 pages. |
| EETimes article entitled “Tuner for Toshiba, Toshiba Taps iReady for Internet Tuner”, by David Lammers, 2 pages, printed Nov. 2, 1998. |
| “Comparison of Novell Netware and TCP/IP Protocol Architectures”, by J.S. Carbone, 19 pages, printed Apr. 10, 1998. |
| Adaptec article entitled “AEA-7110C-a DuraSAN product”, 11 pages, printed Oct. 1, 2001. |
| iSCSI HBA article entitled “iSCSI and 2Gigabit fibre Channel Host Bus Adapters from Emulex, QLogic, Adaptec, JNI”, 8 pages, printed Oct. 1, 2001. |
| iSCSI HBA article entitled “FCE-3210/6410 32 and 64-bit PCI-to-Fibre Channel HBA”, 6 pages, printed Oct. 1, 2001. |
| ISCSI.com article entitled “iSCSI Storage”, 2 pages, printed Oct. 1, 2001. |
| “Two-Way TCP Traffic Over Rate Controlled Channels: Effects and Analysis”, by Kalampoukas et al., IEEE Transactions on Networking, vol. 6, No. 6, Dec. 1998, 17 pages. |
| IReady News article entitled “Toshiba Delivers First Chips to Make Consumer Devices Internet-Ready Based on iReady Design”, Santa Clara, CA, and Tokyo, Japan, Oct. 14, 1998, printed Nov. 2, 1998, 3 pages. |
| Internet pages of InterProphet entitled “Frequently Asked Questions”, by Lynne Jolitz, printed Jun. 14, 1999, 4 pages. |
| “File System Design for an NFS File Server Appliance”, Article by D. Hitz, et al., 13 pages. |
| Adaptec Press Release article entitled “Adaptec Announces EtherStorage Technology”, 2 pages, May 4, 2000, printed Jun. 14, 2000. |
| Adaptec article entitled “EtherStorage Frequently Asked Questions”, 5 pages, printed Jul. 19, 2000. |
| Adaptec article entitled “EtherStorage White Paper”, 7 pages, printed Jul. 19, 2000. |
| CIBC World Markets article entitled “Computers; Storage”, by J. Berlino et al., 9 pages, dated Aug. 7, 2000. |
| Merrill Lynch article entitled “Storage Futures”, by S. Milunovich, 22 pages, dated May 10, 2000. |
| CBS Market Watch article entitled “Montreal Start-Up Battles Data Storage Botttleneck”, by S. Taylor, dated Mar. 5, 2000, 2 pages, printed Mar. 7, 2000. |
| Internet-draft article entitled “SCSI/TCP (SCSI over TCP)”, by J. Satran et al., 38 pages, dated Feb. 2000, printed May 19, 2000. |
| Internet pages entitled Technical White Paper—Xpoint's Disk to LAN Acceleration Solution for Windows NT Server, printed Jun. 5, 1997, 15 pages. |
| Jato Technologies article entitled Network Accelerator Chip Architecture, twelve-slide presentation, printed Aug. 19, 1998, 13 pages. |
| EETimes article entitled Enterprise System Uses Flexible Spec, dated Aug. 10, 1998, printed Nov. 25, 1998, 3 pages. |
| Internet pages entitled “Smart Ethernet Network Interface Cards”, which Berend Ozceri is developing, printed Nov. 25, 1998, 2 pages. |
| Internet pages of Xaqti corporation entitled “GigaPower Protocol Processor Product Review,” printed Nov. 25, 1999, 4 pages. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 60/283,896, Titled: CRC Calculations for Out of Order PUDs, Filed Apr. 12, 2003, Inventor: Amit Oren, Assignee: Siliquent Technologies Ltd. |
| Internet pages entitled “DART: Fast Application Level Networking via Data-Copy Avoidance,” by Robert J. Walsh, printed Jun. 3, 1999, 25 pages. |
| Andrew S. Tanenbaum, Computer Networks, Third Edition, 1996, ISBN 0-13-349945-6. |
| Article from Rice University entitled “LRP: A New Network Subsystem Architecture for Server Systems”, by Peter Druschel and Gaurav Banga, 14 pages. |
| Internet RFC/STD/FYI/BCP Archives article with heading “RFC2140” entitled “TCP Control Block Interdependence”, web address http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc2140.html, 9 pages, printed Sep. 20, 2002. |
| Wind River article entitled “Tornado: For Intelligent Network Acceleration”, copyright Wind River Systems, 2001, 2 pages. |
| WindRiver White Paper entitled “Complete TCP/IP Offload for High-Speed Ethernet Networks”, Copyright Wind River Systems, 2002, 7 pages. |
| Intel article entitled “Solving Server Bottlenecks with Intel Server Adapters”, Copyright Intel Corporation, 1999, 8 pages. |
| Schwaderer et al., IEEE Computer Society Press publication entitled, “XTP in VLSI Protocol Decomposition for ASIC Implementation”, from 15th Conference on Local Computer Networks, 5 pages, Sep. 30-Oct. 3, 1990. |
| Beach, Bob, IEEE Computer Society Press publication entitled, “UltraNet: An Architecture for Gigabit Networking”, from 15th Conference on Local Computer Networks, 18 pages, Sep. 30-Oct. 3, 1990. |
| Chesson et al., IEEE Syposium Record entitled, “The Protocol Engine Chipset”, from Hot Chips III, 16 pages, Aug. 26-27, 1991. |
| Maclean et al., IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference, Globecom '91, presentation entitled, “An Outboard Processor for High Performance Implementation of Transport Layer Protocols”, 7 pages, Dec. 2-5, 1991. |
| Ross et al., IEEE article entitled “FX1000: A high performance single chip Gigabit Ethernet NIC”, from Compcon '97 Proceedings, 7 pages, Feb. 23-26, 1997. |
| Strayer et al., “Ch. 9: The Protocol Engine” from XTP: The Transfer Protocol, 12 pages, Jul. 1992. |
| Publication entitled “Protocol Engine Handbook”, 44 pages, Oct. 1990. |
| Koufopavlou et al., IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference, Globecom '92, presentation entitled, “Parallel TCP for High Performance Communication Subsystems”, 7 pages, Dec. 6-9, 1992. |
| Lilienkamp et al., Publication entitled “Proposed Host-Front End Protocol”, 56 pages, Dec. 1984. |
| Thia et al. Publication entitled “High-Speed OSI Protocol Bypass Algorithm with Window Flow Control,” Protocols for High Speed Networks, pp. 53-68, 1993. |
| U.S. Appl. No. 60/053,240, Titled: TCP/IP Network Accelerator and Method of Use, Filed Jul. 17, 1997, Inventor: William Jolizt et al. |
| Thia et al. Publication entitled “A Reduced Operational Protocol Engine (ROPE) for a multiple-layer bypass architecture,” Protocols for High Speed Networks, pp. 224-239, 1995. |
| Form 10-K for Exelan, Inc., for the fiscal year ending Dec. 31, 1987 (10 pages). |
| Form 10-K for Exelan, Inc., for the fiscal year ending Dec. 31, 1988 (10 pages). |
| Starr, David D. et al. “Intelligent Network Storage Interface Device.” U.S. Appl. No. 09/675,700, filed Sep. 29, 2000. |
| Boucher, Laurence B. et al. “Intelligent Network Interface System and Method for Accelerated Protocol Processing.” U.S. Appl. No. 09/692,561, filed Oct. 18, 2000. |
| Starr, Daryl D.. et al. “Intelligent Network Storage Interface System.” U.S. Appl. No. 10/261,051, filed Sep. 30, 2002. |
| Merritt, Rick. “Ethernet Interconnect Outpacing Infiniband at Intel.” EE Times article. Sep. 11, 2002. 9 pages. |
| Craft, Peter K. et al. “TCP Offload Device that Batches Session Layer Headers to Reduce Interrupts as Well as CPU Copies.” U.S. Appl. No. 12/581,342, filed Oct. 19, 2009. |
| Craft, Peter K. et al. “TCP Offload Send Optimization.” U.S. Appl. No. 12/504,021, filed Jul. 16, 2009. |
| Philbrick, Clive M. et al. “Freeing Transmit Memory on a Network Interface Device Prior to Receiving an Acknowledgment That Transmit Data Has Been Received by a Remote Device.” U.S. Appl. No. 12/470,980, filed May 22, 2009. |
| Starr, Daryl D. et al. “Accelerating Data Transfer in a Virtual Computer System with Tightly Coupled TCP Connections.” U.S. Appl. No. 12/410,366, filed Mar. 24, 2009. |
| Boucher, Laurence B. et al. “Obtaining a Destination Address So That a Network Interface Device Can Write Network Data Without Headers Directly Into Host Memory.” U.S. Appl. No. 12/325,941, filed Dec. 1, 2008. |
| Boucher, Laurence B. et al. “Enabling an Enhanced Function of an Electronic Device.” U.S. Appl. No. 11/985,948, filed Nov. 19, 2007. |
| Starr, Daryl D. et al. “Network Interface Device With 10 Gb/s Full-Duplex Transfer Rate.” U.S. Appl. No. 11/799,720, filed May 1, 2007. |
| Craft, Peter K. et al. “Peripheral Device That DMAS the Same Data to Different Locations in a Computer.” U.S. Appl. No. 11/788,719, filed Apr. 19, 2007. |
| Boucher, Laurence B. et al. “TCP/IP Offload Network Interface Device.” U.S. Appl. No. 11/701,705, filed Feb. 2, 2007. |
| Starr, Daryl D. et al. “TCP/IP Offload Device With Reduced Sequential Processing.” U.S. Appl. No. 11/348,810, filed Feb. 6, 2006. |
| Craft, Peter K. et al. “Transferring Control of TCP Connections Between Hierarchy of Processing Mechanisms.” U.S. Appl. No. 11/249,006, filed Oct. 11, 2005. |
| Boucher, Laurence B. et al. “Network Interface Device That Can Transfer Control of a TCP Connection to a Host CPU.” U.S. Appl. No. 11/029,863, filed Jan. 4, 2005. |
| Craft, Peter K. et al. “Protocol Stack That Offloads a TCP Connection From a Host Computer to a Network Interface Device.” U.S. Appl. No. 11/027,842, filed Dec. 30, 2004. |
| Craft, Peter K. et al. “Protocol Stack That Offloads a TCP Connection From a Host Computer to a Network Interface Device.” U.S. Appl. No. 11/016,642, filed Dec. 16, 2004. |
| Boucher, Laurence B. et al. “Method and Apparatus for Dynamic Packet Batching With a High Performance Network Interface.” U.S. Appl. No. 10/678,336, filed Oct. 3, 2003. |
| Philbrick Clive M. et al. “Method and Apparatus for Data Re-Assembly With a High Performance Network Interface.” U.S. Appl. No. 10/634,062, filed Aug. 4, 2003. |
| Boucher, Laurence B. et al. “High Network Interface Device and System for Accelerated Communication.” U.S. Appl. No. 10/601,237, filed Jun. 19, 2003. |
| Boucher, Laurence B. et al. “Method and Apparatus for Distributing Network Traffic Processing on a Multiprocessor Computer.” U.S. Appl. No. 10/438,719, filed May 14, 2003. |
| Boucher, Laurence B. et al. “Parsing a Packet Header.” U.S. Appl. No. 10/277,604, filed Oct. 18, 2002. |
| Chandranmenon, Girish P. “Trading Packet Headers for Packet Processing.” IEEE/ACM Transaction on Networking. vol. 4, No. 2. Apr. 1996. pp. 141-152. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20090234963 A1 | Sep 2009 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 60374788 | Apr 2002 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 10413256 | Apr 2003 | US |
| Child | 12470980 | US |
