The invention relates to the control of motorized freight elevator doors.
Freight elevators, sometimes called cargo lifts or goods lifts are typically arranged with vertically sliding doors at their landings. Commonly, these doors are bi-parting panels or slide up to open panels. The landing doors can be motorized and various techniques are used by different manufacturers to control the opening and closing movement of a landing door.
For example, one system operates by applying a brake to the motor drive when the door is reaching the end of its travel in opening or closing movement. The positioning of the door is detected by switches or like devices mounted on the hoistway or shaft at the landing associated with each door. Such prior art systems, when being installed, require extensive wiring and numerous sensing devices in the shaft to detect the position of each landing door. The sensors can require careful adjustment and the motor drive controls can be troublesome when the sensors are not properly adjusted initially or eventually go out of adjustment through wear.
The invention provides a system for controlling the operation of motorized freight elevator landing doors. The system reduces the number of sensors needed to determine door position in a line of landings and eliminates the requirement of precise adjustment of any sensors and/or physical contact between the sensors and other components of the system. The system is further simplified by a door motor energization strategy that avoids critical timing or critical position sensing and reliably eliminates bouncing or rebounding of a door panel as it reaches full close or full open position.
As disclosed, the invention departs from a conventional practice where landing door position is detected by a plurality of sensors at each landing and, instead, locates the landing door position sensors on the elevator car. Thus, the same single set of sensors are used for all of the landings in a line served by the elevator car. This reduces installation cost and complexity and improves reliability. In the disclosed embodiment, the landing door position sensors are proximity switches or sensors arranged to detect the approach of a door as it nears its open or closed position. The signals from the proximity sensors are used by a controller to change a door motor speed from fast to slow near the end of opening or closing movement. The controller is arranged to continue to supply power to a door motor and allow it to stall for a short period after the door has come to a stop position to eliminate or suppress any tendency of the door to bounce when it engages an opposing surface at the limits of its motion.
Referring now to
The elevator car 14 includes a platform 29 and a ceiling 31 shown in
With reference to
Three-phase power is supplied to the controller 46 at lines 56–58. The controller 46 through the banks of relay contacts 51, 52 supplies power to the landing door motors 28 which are two-speed reversible units, through appropriate combinations of three of five lines 61–65. For simplicities sake, the lines 61–65 are only shown going to the motor 28 on the left in
The motorized landing door system operates in the following manner. Assuming the door 17 is open as shown in
The controller 46 opens the door panels 18, 19 by operating the motors 28 in a sequence similar to that described when closing the door panel. The controller 46, through the relays O and DH causes the motors 28 to turn in a rotational direction to open the doors at high speed. When the lower panel 19 approaches a full open position, the proximity sensor 37 detects the presence of the lower edge area of the plate 38 and signals the controller 46 through the line 48 that the door is nearing its full open position. The controller 46 responds by energizing the relay DL to cause the motors 28 to operate at slow speed. This slow speed, as before in closing action, reduces impact forces when the door panels reach conventional open position stops. The controller 46 maintains electrical power to the motors 28 for a time period sufficient to ensure that after a door panel 18, 19 reaches a physical stop limiting opening movement, the motors are energized and are allowed to stall to damp any rebound or bouncing of the panels.
It will be understood that the described operation is performed at any landing in a line served by the elevator car 14. The same proximity sensors 36, 37 on the car 14 work with plates or cams like the plate 38 provided on each landing door. The described system, thus, provides an advance over the art where the landing doors at each landing have their own dedicated separately mounted, wired and adjusted position sensors in the hoistway adjacent each landing.
Those skilled in the art will understand that the invention may be applied to single panel doors which, typically, open upwardly from a sill; in such a case, the proximity sensors or their equivalents that detect approach of the door to its fully open position is located near the car ceiling and the sensor detecting a nearly closed door position is located near the platform. Other types of position sensors can be substituted for the non-contact proximity sensors 36, 37 on the car 14 to determine that a landing door or panel is within a predetermined distance from a limit of its motion and to signal the controller of the same. These substitutes can include conventional limit switches or photodetectors, for example. A door panel can be operated in accordance with the invention by a single motor with appropriate mechanical drive, as is known in the art.
It should be evident that this disclosure is by way of example and that various changes may be made by adding, modifying or eliminating details without departing from the fair scope of the teaching contained in this disclosure. The invention is therefore not limited to particular details of this disclosure except to the extent that the following claims are necessarily so limited.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1378017 | Fogal et al. | May 1921 | A |
1864667 | Peelle | Jun 1932 | A |
1927559 | Talen | Sep 1933 | A |
1932198 | Talen | Oct 1933 | A |
1943042 | Schweig | Jan 1934 | A |
1989148 | Peelle | Jan 1935 | A |
2012440 | Waldman | Aug 1935 | A |
2014735 | Schweig | Oct 1935 | A |
2017736 | Schweig | Oct 1935 | A |
2020336 | Schwartz | Nov 1935 | A |
2175906 | McCormick | Oct 1939 | A |
2235384 | Radeeff | Mar 1941 | A |
2275643 | Norton et al. | Mar 1942 | A |
2286003 | Norton et al. | Jun 1942 | A |
2306493 | Norton et al. | Dec 1942 | A |
2500072 | Harmon | Mar 1950 | A |
2526503 | Raque | Oct 1950 | A |
2579017 | Schweig | Dec 1951 | A |
2673316 | Doeg et al. | Mar 1954 | A |
2937867 | Schweig | May 1960 | A |
4750592 | Watt | Jun 1988 | A |
5587565 | Schroder-Brumloop et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5878846 | O'Donnell | Mar 1999 | A |
6435315 | Zaharia | Aug 2002 | B1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20040168863 A1 | Sep 2004 | US |