The present invention relates generally to communication between an untethered device and a sensing system and, more particularly, to sensing systems and methods that employ an untethered stylus as a user input implement.
Personal computing systems of varying type and configuration typically provide one or more user interface devices to facilitate user interaction with such computing systems. Well known user interface devices include a keyboard, mouse, trackball, joystick, and the like. Various types of personal computing devices, such as tablet PCs, provide a pen apparatus that can be manipulated by the user, much in the same way as a pencil or ink pen.
Conventional computing devices that provide for user input via a pen or other pointer implement typically employ an electromagnetic inductive system. The electromagnetic inductive system usually comprises an electromagnetic pen or pointer apparatus and a digitizer in the form of a tablet. Changes in pen location relative to the digitizer's sensing surface are detected and location computations are made to determine the coordinates of the pen.
The present invention is directed to systems and methods for enhancing communication between an untethered device and a sensing system. According to embodiments of the present invention, an untethered device is configured to inductively couple to a source device. The source device is configured to generate a varying magnetic field having a fixed frequency. The untethered device includes a tunable resonant circuit having a resonance frequency and configured to generate a supply voltage for the untethered device in response to the varying magnetic field. The tunable resonant circuit includes an inductive coil comprising a center tap and a capacitive circuit coupled to the inductive coil.
The capacitive circuit includes an anti-series arrangement of varactor diodes that behave as a capacitance when placed in reverse bias. A frequency control circuit is coupled to the tunable resonant circuit and includes a control voltage source coupled to the center tap of the inductive coil. The control voltage source produces a control signal to place the varactor diodes in reverse bias and to change the capacitance of the capacitive circuit, thereby effecting a change in the resonance frequency of the tunable resonant circuit.
The anti-series arrangement of varactor diodes preferably provides for a total capacitance, Ct, that is substantially AC voltage amplitude independent except for a second order effect. The control signal produced by the control voltage source preferably changes the capacitance of the capacitive circuit so that the resonance frequency of the tunable resonant circuit is tuned to the fixed frequency of the magnetic field.
The inductive coil includes first and second contacts at respective first and second ends of the inductive coil. A first varactor diode arrangement is preferably coupled between the first end of the inductive coil and ground. A second varactor diode arrangement is preferably coupled between the second end of the inductive coil and ground. In some implementations, each of the first and second varactor diode arrangements includes a multiplicity of varactor diodes. For example, each of the first and second varactor diode arrangements may include a multiplicity of parallel connected varactor diodes.
In some implementations, the control voltage source may include an operational amplifier having a negative input, a positive input, and an output. The output of the operational amplifier may be coupled to the center tap of the inductive coil. The positive input of the operational amplifier may be coupled to ground, and the negative input of the operational amplifier may be coupled to voltage source circuitry.
In other implementations, the positive input of the operational amplifier may be coupled to ground, and the negative input of the operational amplifier may be coupled to a first voltage source and a second voltage source. The first voltage source may provide a bias voltage and the second voltage source may provide a slowly varying AC voltage relative to the resonance frequency of the tunable resonant circuit.
In accordance with other embodiments, methods of the present invention may be implemented involving an untethered device configured to inductively couple to a source device, the source device configured to generate a varying magnetic field having a fixed frequency. Methods of the present invention may involve generating, by a tunable resonant circuit of the untethered device, a supply voltage for the untethered device in response to the varying magnetic field. The tunable resonant circuit may include an inductive coil coupled to a capacitive circuit, the capacitive circuit comprising an anti-series arrangement of varactor diodes that behave as a capacitance when placed in reverse bias.
Methods of the invention may further involve producing a control signal and applying the control signal to a center tap of the inductive coil to place the varactor diodes in reverse bias and to change the capacitance of the capacitive circuit, thereby effecting a change in the resonance frequency of the tunable resonant circuit. The anti-series arrangement of varactor diodes preferably provides for a total capacitance, Ct, that is substantially AC voltage amplitude independent except for a second order effect.
Producing the control signal may involve receiving first and second voltage signals and producing the control signal using the first and second voltage signals. The first voltage signal may be a bias voltage and the second voltage signal may be a slowly varying AC voltage relative to the resonance frequency of the tunable resonant circuit.
Changing the capacitance of the capacitive circuit is preferably effected using the control signal. For example, changing the capacitance of the capacitive circuit may be effected using the control signal so that the resonance frequency of the tunable resonant circuit is tuned to the fixed frequency of the magnetic field.
In various embodiments, the source device may include an RFID reader and the untethered device may include an RFID tag. In other embodiments, the source device includes a digitizer and the untethered device is configured as a stylus.
The above summary of the present invention is not intended to describe each embodiment or every implementation of the present invention. Advantages and attainments, together with a more complete understanding of the invention, will become apparent and appreciated by referring to the following detailed description and claims taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.
While the invention is amenable to various modifications and alternative forms, specifics thereof have been shown by way of example in the drawings and will be described in detail. It is to be understood, however, that the intention is not to limit the invention to the particular embodiments described. On the contrary, the intention is to cover all modifications, equivalents, and alternatives falling within the scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims.
In the following description of the illustrated embodiments, reference is made to the accompanying drawings which form a part hereof, and in which is shown by way of illustration, various embodiments in which the invention may be practiced. It is to be understood that the embodiments may be utilized and structural changes may be made without departing from the scope of the present invention.
The present invention is directed to methods and systems for effecting communication between an untethered device and a sensing system. Embodiments of the present invention provide for enhanced communication of information, such as analog and/or digital information, between the untethered device and the sensing system. Exemplary embodiments of the untethered device include a stylus or RFID (Radio Frequency Identification) tag. Exemplary embodiments of the sensing system include a device locating sensor or touch location sensor, such as a digitizer, or a RFID reader. Other examples of untethered devices include game pieces that interact with a game board or other structure that incorporates a sensing system. It is understood that methods and systems in accordance with the present invention may be implemented in a wide range of devices and systems other than those particularly described herein.
Embodiments of the present invention are directed to tuning of resonant circuitry provided at an untethered device, such as a stylus or RFID tag. Implementations of such embodiments provide for optimal continuous tuning of resonant circuitry in an untethered device, such as by extracting an error control signal that can be used in a feedback mechanism to self-tune the resonance frequency of inductive-capacitive circuits. In this manner, the need for time consuming hand tuning of individual circuits at the manufacturing level is eliminated, and optimal performance under varying external conditions, such as temperature, is achieved.
Other embodiments of the present invention are directed to controlling the resonance frequency of LC circuits in an untethered device using a control voltage to change the capacitance, C, of this LC circuit. An automatic mechanism using feedback according to such embodiments provides for precise and continuous tuning of the capacitor value, C, in order to ensure optimal circuit performance. Such a mechanism obviates time consuming and expensive manual tuning of component values and subsequent detuning because of slowly changing conditions.
According to further embodiments of the present invention, methodologies provide for self-tuning the frequency of a source device, so as to optimize an induced voltage over a capacitor in an LC circuit of an untethered device. Such embodiments provide methodologies for self-tuning the frequency of a driver that inductively couples to the LC circuit of an untethered device so that a maximum voltage is developed over the capacitor C in the LC circuit.
Embodiments of an untethered stylus of the present invention may be implemented in the context of a location sensing system, embodiments of which are illustrated in
The sensing device 11 is shown to include a drive loop or coil 18 coupled to drive loop electronics 16 that cooperate to generate a magnetic field, which may be a continuously varying magnetic field. Drive coil 18 may comprise one or more coils or loops. The stylus 12, having derived power from the magnetic field emanating from the drive coil 18, broadcasts a signal from which stylus location and status may be determined by the sensing device 11.
The stylus 12 is preferably configured to include one or more user-actuatable buttons or switches, such as those commonly employed to implement various mouse functions (e.g., right and left mouse buttons). The tip of the stylus 12 may incorporate a pressure sensor from which applied pressure can be resolved and transmitted to the sensing device 11. Eraser functionality may also be incorporated in the form of a switch or pressure sensor at the stylus end opposite the tip.
Sensor interface electronics 20 is coupled to the sensor 14 and facilitates measurement of signals developed at the sensor 14 in response to signals broadcast by the stylus 12. According to one configuration, the sensor 14 includes a digitizer that incorporates a detection grid and electronics as is known in the art. For example, such a detection grid may include pairs of position resolving conductors each of which forms one or more differential coil elements in the sensor 14, with each conductor pair receiving a magnetic signal transmitted by the stylus 14. An illustrative example of a digitizer having such a detection grid configuration, elements of which may be employed in a location sensor system of the present invention, is disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,786,765; 5,218,174; 5,633,471; 5,793,360; 6,667,740; and 7,019,672; which are hereby incorporated herein by reference.
According to another configuration, the sensing device 11 may incorporate a sensor 14 that effectively incorporates a digitizer and a touch-sensitive sensor. The digitizer, according to this configuration, allows the location and status of the stylus 12 to be determined. The touch-sensitive sensor allows the location of a finger touch to be determined. This configuration allows a user to use either the stylus 12 or a finger to indicate a desired location on a computer display, as well as determine the location and status of the stylus 12.
The touch-sensitive sensor 14 typically includes a matrix that capacitively couples to the stylus 12 and/or a finger. In this configuration, the sensor 14 of the sensing device 11 is preferably made up of a series of transparent conductors placed upon a glass or plastic cover that can be placed in front of an LCD display. One side of the glass or plastic sheet has conductors in the X direction, and the opposite side has conductors in the Y direction. Examples of suitable touch sensitive sensors 14 are disclosed in commonly owned U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,133,906 and 6,970,160, in commonly owned U.S. Published Application No. 2005/0083307, in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,762,752 and 6,690,156, and in U.S. Published Application No. 2004/0095333, each of which is hereby incorporated herein by reference.
An embodiment that incorporates a digitizer and touch-sensitive sensor advantageously allows a user to point a stylus at a computer display and have the location and status of the pointing device determined and, when a finger is used to point at the display device, allows for the determination of the location of a finger touch at the display device. The dual use aspects of this embodiment of a sensing device 11 make it particularly useful in tablet PC applications.
For example, a digitizer arrangement allows a user to use a stylus to input information, indicate operations the user wants to take, and write or draw on the display. The touch-sensitive sensor allows the user to “type” information onto a virtual keyboard on the display screen, for example. This would allow the vendor of the computing system, in which a dual touch location sensor system of the present invention is implemented, to eliminate the keyboard and the associated bulk it requires. It is understood that a digitizer and a touch-sensitive sensor need not be implemented together in all configurations, but inclusion of both sensing devices provides for enhanced user interaction with a computing system that incorporates a sensing system 10 of the present invention.
According to one embodiment, the drive coil 18 may be constructed of wire, such as 36 gauge wire, looped several times (e.g., 4 times) around the periphery of the frame of sensing device 11. In one implementation, the drive coil 18 may have an inductance of about 21 μH and an impedance of about 14 Ohms at 100 kHz. The drive coil 18 is connected to a signal generator of the drive loop electronics 16. The signal generator may be configured to produce 200 periods of a 100 kHz sine wave signal gated at 250 Hz. The signal generator may, for example, produce an output signal of 0.4 Vpp, resulting in approximately 28 mA of current that flows in the drive coil 18.
The stylus 12 is configured to collect energy from the magnetic field generated by drive coil 18/drive loop electronics 16 using a tank circuit. The tank circuit is preferably tuned to resonate at the frequency that the drive coil 18 is driven. In this illustrative example, the frequency is set at 100 kHz. The tank circuit of the stylus 12 builds amplitude during the burst produced by the drive coil 18 and then gradually loses signal amplitude after the drive coil 18 is turned off. The time associated with the exponential charging and discharging of the resonant tank circuit of the stylus 12 is determined by the capacitive and inductive elements in the tank circuit. Matching of the tank circuit's resonance frequency and the drive signal frequency is preferably accomplished using one or more of the techniques described hereinbelow.
Referring again to
As is shown in
A processor 22 is coupled to the drive loop electronics 16, sensor interface electronics 20, and a communications interface 24, as is shown in
The location and status information computed by the processor 22 is communicated to a computer and/or display 26 via a communications interface 24. The communications interface 24 may be configured as an RS-232 or USB interface, for example. The processor 22 may be configured to drive a display 26 directly. Alternatively, a computer 28 may be coupled to the communications interface 24 and receive the location and status information from the processor 22, and drive its display. The processor 22 or computer 28 may be configured to control cursor velocity, momentum and other factors to enhance the user experience with the sensing system 11.
Referring now to
The ferrite coil arrangement 56 resonates with a separate parallel-connected capacitor of the electronics 52 and is tuned to the excitation field frequency. In various embodiments, circuitry 55 is provided in the untethered stylus 12 to provide for self-tuning of the resonance frequency of the frequency sensitive LC circuitry in accordance with one or more techniques described herein. In other embodiments, the frequency of a source voltage produced by the source device that generates the excitation field is adjusted so that the phase of an input impedance of the source device is substantially zero, thereby maximizing a voltage across the capacitor of the frequency sensitive LC circuitry of the untethered stylus 12.
The parallel coil-capacitor combination is connected between the stylus tip 57 and the stylus shield 59. The shield 59 may form part of, or otherwise be connected to, the stylus housing so that it can be touched, and therefore grounded, by a user's hand when held. The shield 59 may be situated to extend over the circuitry region of the stylus 12, and preferably has a discontinuous shape, such as a “C” shape, so as to avoid eddy currents that could otherwise arise in a closed loop shield arrangement.
The stylus tip 57 couples capacitively to the location sensor from which location information is derived. To provide stylus status information, the ferrite coil arrangement 56 powers the electronics 52 which amplitude modulates the stylus tip voltage at the reference frequency or frequencies. The frequency of the oscillations is changed to reflect the stylus status, such as switch closures or tip pressure changes.
Alternatively, the invention may be implemented with magnetic-sensing digitizer systems as are known in the art. An untethered magnetic stylus is similar to the capacitive stylus shown in
The capacitance value of capacitor C1 shown in
The second voltage of consideration is the voltage that develops across the capacitor C1. This voltage VC is also the stylus tip voltage. From basic circuit analysis at resonance, it follows that: VC=V/(ωRC)=V(ωL/R) with the quantity 1/(ωRC)=(Lω)/R defined as the resonant circuit quality factor Q, where ω is expressed in terms of radians per second. This second voltage may be modulated for purposes of communicating stylus status data to a location sensor.
With continued reference to
This method of data transmission, however, is not suitable for a stylus powered by a constantly varying magnetic field and capacitively coupled to the digitizer. Constant excitation does not allow a transient measurement of the stylus resonance, and phase modulation is difficult to detect as the phase of the digitizer received signal varies dramatically as the stylus is moved across the location sensor (e.g., digitizer). Frequency modulation of an amplitude-modulated signal using multiple reference frequencies generated at the stylus, for example, removes these difficulties. The location sensor may be configured to demodulate the amplitude modulation and detect the reference frequencies of the modulation.
According to the implementation shown in
The untethered device 12 is further shown to include a frequency control circuit 64, which is coupled to the tunable resonant circuit 62 via a control line 66. The frequency control circuit 64 is configured to produce a control signal, Sc, using signals developed within the tunable resonant circuit 62. In this illustrative example, voltage signals V1 and V2, developed within the tunable resonant circuit 62, are extracted for use in tuning the tunable resonant circuit 62. The control signal, SC, generated by the frequency control circuit 64, is useable to adjust the resonance frequency of the tunable resonant circuit 62 to match the fixed frequency of the source device 60.
Turning now to
In conventional implementations, the components L1 72 and C 74 are fixed, such that the resonance frequency, fres, of the L1-C combination 72, 74 is defined as:
The resonance frequency, fres, of the L1-C combination 72, 74 is not exactly equal to the source frequency, fs. As a result, the voltage V2 that develops across the capacitor C 74 is lower than desired. Because this voltage, V2, is often used to power additional circuitry or communication electronics, a reduced voltage across the capacitor C 74 results in suboptimal performance. A tunable resonant circuit with frequency control in accordance with the present invention provides an improvement in performance, in that L1 72, C 74 or both may be automatically and continuously tuned so that the resonance frequency, fres, of the L1-C combination 72, 74 becomes exactly equal to the frequency, fs, of the source device 60.
Defining the angular resonance frequency ωres=2πfres and applying Kirchoff's laws to the circuit in
so that the phase angle, φ between V1 and V2 is given by:
Voltage signals V1 and V2 developed as shown in
In general, the control signal generated by the frequency control circuit is preferably a signal that is proportional to the voltage signals V1 and V2. The control signal may also be a signal that is proportional to the voltage signal V2. According to one approach, the control signal is preferably produced by a multiplication of the voltage signals V1 and V2. If V1 and V2 are harmonic and have the same frequency but a phase shift of φ, as defined above, the multiplication results in the following:
The first term in the brackets of the resultant equation, cos φ, is the desired control signal component. The second term, cos(2φt−φ), is a double frequency signal component that is undesirable. This second term is preferably filtered out of the control signal, which, after filtering, can be represented as Vc cos φ. Those skilled in the art will appreciate that various known techniques used in a variety of mixing and superheterodyning applications may be employed to extract a control signal usable to adjust the resonance frequency of the tunable resonant circuit of the untethered device 12 to match the fixed frequency of the source device 60 in accordance with the present invention.
As discussed above, if V1 and V2 are harmonic and have the same frequency but a phase shift of φ, then Vout is calculated according to the equation above. This signal, Vout, is then fed to the low pass filter 95, which may be configured to filter out the double frequency signal component discussed above or to simply pass only a DC signal. The output of low pass filter 95 is the control signal Vc cos φ. It is noted that both V1 and V2 will not vanish near the resonance frequency, fres, of the untethered device's tunable resonant circuit, so that Vc will always have an acceptable amplitude.
In low frequency applications (e.g., <1 MHz), the multiplier 93 may include an analog multiplier chip, such as a four-quadrant analog multiplier model AD633 available from Analog Devices, Inc. For high frequency applications (i.e., >1 MHz), any suitable mixer may be used.
It is understood by those skilled in the art that inductances (L) and capacitances (C), as well as other factors, influence the resonance frequency of a circuit made up of these components. For high quality circuits, for example, resonance frequency variation can be very sensitive for even slightly different component values. To avoid time consuming and thus expensive manual tuning of component values, and to avoid subsequent detuning because of slowly changing conditions, an automatic mechanism using feedback in accordance with embodiments of the present invention provides for precise continuous tuning of the capacitor value, C, to ensure optimal circuit performance.
The bias voltage, Vb, is essentially DC and the control voltage, Vc is at most slowly varying compared to the resonance frequency of the LC circuit. The OPAMP output voltage, Vo, is given by:
Demanding that varactor diodes C1 81 and C2 82 are always driven in reverse or that the OPAMP output voltage, Vo, is always negative, as given below:
−Vs<Vo<0
results in the following allowed operating range for the control voltage, Vc:
When R1 70=R2 77=R3 78, and with Vb=0.5 Vs, the control voltage, Vc, has the following desirable range:
Because of the anti-series arrangement of the varactor diodes C1 81 and C2 82, an external alternating flux that is coupled by coil 79 will induce a voltage over coil 79 that will cause varactor diode C1 81 to be driven less in reverse and varactor diode C2 82 more in reverse. Assuming a linear varactor capacitance-voltage dependence ΔC=kΔV, this means that varactor diode C1 81 undergoes a capacitance change +ΔC whereas varactor diode C2 82 undergoes a −ΔC change. With C1=C2=C, the total capacitance, Ct, formed by C1 81 and C2 82 is then given by:
so that:
meaning that the total capacitance, Ct, is virtually AC voltage amplitude independent, except for a second order effect.
In one implementation, a total of 8 varactor diodes as 2 groups of 4 parallel diodes may be used to form C1 81 and C2 82. A ferrite containing self-inductance (L) coil 79 of 22 mH may be used so that the total capacitance, Ct=C1C2/(C1+C2), at Vb=7.5 V and Vc=0 V is estimated to be about 115 pF. Therefore, C1 81 and C2 82 each have a capacitance of approximately 230 pF. The sensitivity for such an implementation is around 1 kHz/V.
The circuit in
Further embodiments of the present invention are directed to self-tuning the frequency of a drive source that inductively couples to an LC circuit of an untethered device, such as a stylus or RFID tag, so that a maximum voltage develops over the capacitor, C, in the LC circuit.
Also shown in
In operation, the driver circuit 92 and drive coil 18 cooperate to generate a varying magnetic field. The phase detector 96 detects a phase of an input impedance of the driver circuit 92 in response to the source device 60 inductively coupling with the LC circuit of the untethered device 12. The controller 94 adjusts a frequency of a source voltage applied to the driver circuit 92 in response to an output signal of the phase detector 96. The controller 94, which may be implemented using a voltage controlled oscillator, adjusts the source voltage frequency so that the phase of the input impedance as indicated by the output signal of the phase detector 96 is substantially zero. In this manner, controller adjustment of the source voltage frequency compensates for a change in the resonance frequency, or a parameter of the resonance frequency, of the resonant LC circuit of the untethered device 12.
A variety of available phase detectors may be used to perform phase detection and comparison. In low frequency applications (i.e. <1 MHz), for example, an analog multiplier, such as the aforementioned AD633, may be used. In higher frequency applications (i.e., >1 MHz), a passive component, such as a PDP-201 Phase Detector available from Synergy Microwave Corporation, may be used for phase detection. Other commercial components and implementation may be used that provide similar functionality and performance.
The following analysis is provided with reference to
with ω angular frequency, whereas Zin is given by:
The source frequency self-tuning methodology described above works well for strong coupling or high values of k, where k takes on values between 0 and 1 (i.e., 0<k<1).
The foregoing description of the various embodiments of the invention has been presented for the purposes of illustration and description. It is not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the invention to the precise form disclosed. Many modifications and variations are possible in light of the above teaching. It is intended that the scope of the invention be limited not by this detailed description, but rather by the claims appended hereto.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3072849 | Firestone | Jan 1963 | A |
3617922 | Bernstein | Nov 1971 | A |
3983322 | Rodgers | Sep 1976 | A |
4029869 | Ingram et al. | Jun 1977 | A |
4289926 | Kobayashi | Sep 1981 | A |
4289927 | Rodgers | Sep 1981 | A |
4353552 | Pepper | Oct 1982 | A |
4360790 | Heise | Nov 1982 | A |
4455451 | Kriz | Jun 1984 | A |
4473717 | Parnell et al. | Sep 1984 | A |
4672154 | Rodgers et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
4686332 | Greanias et al. | Aug 1987 | A |
4786765 | Yamanami et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
4848469 | Murakami et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4878553 | Yamanami et al. | Nov 1989 | A |
4893115 | Blanchard | Jan 1990 | A |
4902858 | Yamanami et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
4948926 | Murakami et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
4956526 | Murakami et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
4988837 | Murakami et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
4999461 | Murakami et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5028745 | Yamanami et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
RE33740 | Taguchi et al. | Nov 1991 | E |
RE33805 | Yamanami et al. | Jan 1992 | E |
5083118 | Kazama | Jan 1992 | A |
5122623 | Zank et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5130500 | Murakami et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5138118 | Russell | Aug 1992 | A |
RE34187 | Yamanami et al. | Mar 1993 | E |
5191175 | Protheroe et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5194819 | Briefer | Mar 1993 | A |
5218173 | Garwin et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5218174 | Gray et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5305017 | Gerpheide | Apr 1994 | A |
5337040 | Kind | Aug 1994 | A |
5369227 | Stone | Nov 1994 | A |
5373118 | Watson | Dec 1994 | A |
5374787 | Miller | Dec 1994 | A |
5381137 | Ghaem et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5402151 | Duwaer | Mar 1995 | A |
5414227 | Schubert et al. | May 1995 | A |
5420379 | Zank et al. | May 1995 | A |
5420804 | Tanaka et al. | May 1995 | A |
5475401 | Verrier et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5486847 | Ranf et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5506375 | Kikuchi | Apr 1996 | A |
5528002 | Katabami | Jun 1996 | A |
5530210 | Fukuzaki | Jun 1996 | A |
5557076 | Wieczorek et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5565658 | Gerpheide et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5571997 | Gray et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5594215 | Jeng | Jan 1997 | A |
5608390 | Gasparik | Mar 1997 | A |
5619431 | Oda | Apr 1997 | A |
5629500 | Fukuzaki et al. | May 1997 | A |
5633471 | Fukushima | May 1997 | A |
5644108 | Katsurahira et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5661269 | Fukuzaki et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5675130 | Sekizawa | Oct 1997 | A |
5682019 | Katsurahira et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5691512 | Obi | Nov 1997 | A |
5691513 | Yamamoto et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5693914 | Ogawa | Dec 1997 | A |
5706000 | Fukuzaki et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5714984 | Fukuzaki et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5730165 | Philipp | Mar 1998 | A |
5748110 | Sekizawa et al. | May 1998 | A |
5751229 | Funahashi | May 1998 | A |
5763839 | Funahashi et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5790106 | Hirano | Aug 1998 | A |
5792997 | Fukuzaki | Aug 1998 | A |
5793360 | Fleck et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5815091 | Dames et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5861583 | Schediwy et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5898136 | Katsurahira | Apr 1999 | A |
5914708 | LaGrange et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5914710 | Chen et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5945980 | Moissev et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5973677 | Gibbons | Oct 1999 | A |
5986646 | Chen et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6002387 | Ronkka et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6005555 | Katsurahira et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6020849 | Fukuzaki | Feb 2000 | A |
6064374 | Fukuzaki | May 2000 | A |
6075468 | Sugiyama | Jun 2000 | A |
6118435 | Fujita et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6133906 | Geaghan | Oct 2000 | A |
6137427 | Binstead | Oct 2000 | A |
6178818 | Plochinger | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6215476 | Depew et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6249234 | Ely et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6307385 | Tardif et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6335727 | Morishita et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6380931 | Gillespie et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6433781 | Oda et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6466036 | Philipp | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6476799 | Lee et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6546107 | Bohnke | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6549096 | Groves et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6576850 | Fukushima et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6587098 | Teterwak | Jul 2003 | B2 |
RE38286 | Flowers | Oct 2003 | E |
6667740 | Ely et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6670561 | Aoki | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6690156 | Weiner et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6762752 | Perski et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6790160 | Kato et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6927762 | Lin | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6970160 | Mulligan et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7019672 | Ely | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7030782 | Ely et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7079118 | Benard et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7241954 | Kanai | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7265303 | Thacker | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7411584 | Hill et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7436164 | Vos | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7453444 | Geaghan | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7474300 | Katsurahira et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7787259 | Free et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7812268 | Ely | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7907130 | Ely | Mar 2011 | B2 |
20020050983 | Liu et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20030001692 | Chiu et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030067447 | Geaghan et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030090347 | Losehand et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20040004488 | Baxter | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040092229 | Hessel | May 2004 | A1 |
20040095333 | Morag et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040104826 | Philipp | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040155871 | Perski et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040233178 | Silk et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050083307 | Aufderheide et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050099188 | Baxter | May 2005 | A1 |
20050128191 | Katsurahira et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050146513 | Hill et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050162411 | Berkel van | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050171714 | Ely et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050174259 | Ely | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20060016800 | Paradiso et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060022959 | Geaghan | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060038628 | Khannur | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060114247 | Brown | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060125472 | Howard et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20070164833 | Kottschlag | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20080106520 | Free et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080116990 | Rokhsaz | May 2008 | A1 |
20080128180 | Perski et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080142281 | Geaghan | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080149401 | Hagen et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080149402 | Vos | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080150550 | Vos | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080150917 | Libbey et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080150918 | Hagen et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080156546 | Hauck | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080158165 | Geaghan et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080158848 | Free et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20090040193 | Geaghan | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090134960 | Larson et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20100188832 | Free et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1512345 | Jul 2004 | CN |
33 42 522 | Jun 1985 | DE |
298 19 250 | Jan 2000 | DE |
0 549 956 | Jul 1993 | EP |
0 607 694 | Mar 2000 | EP |
59-014043 | Jan 1984 | JP |
07319601 | Dec 1995 | JP |
08-179871 | Jul 1996 | JP |
09-046135 | Feb 1997 | JP |
10-011206 | Jan 1998 | JP |
11-024830 | Jan 1999 | JP |
11-073270 | Mar 1999 | JP |
11-249798 | Sep 1999 | JP |
2002-007054 | Jan 2002 | JP |
2002-297300 | Oct 2002 | JP |
2004-062729 | Feb 2004 | JP |
2004-185153 | Jul 2004 | JP |
10-0601151 | Jul 2006 | KR |
10-0601152 | Jul 2006 | KR |
WO 9208206 | May 1992 | WO |
WO 9308551 | Apr 1993 | WO |
WO 9618171 | Jun 1996 | WO |
WO 02103622 | Dec 2002 | WO |
WO 2004021328 | Mar 2004 | WO |
WO 2004036147 | Apr 2004 | WO |
WO 2004040240 | May 2004 | WO |
WO 2004070396 | Aug 2004 | WO |
WO 2006133159 | Dec 2006 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080150658 A1 | Jun 2008 | US |