The invention relates to medical devices and, more particularly, monitoring of physiological signals.
Medical devices may be used to deliver therapy to patients to treat a variety of symptoms or conditions. Examples of therapy include electrical stimulation therapy and drug delivery therapy. Examples of symptoms or conditions include chronic pain, tremor, akinesia, Parkinson's disease, epilepsy, dystonia, neuralgia, obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD), depression, sleep dysfunction, urinary or fecal incontinence, sexual dysfunction, obesity, or gastroparesis. Information relating to symptoms or conditions may be sensed by monitoring physiological signals, such as electrocardiogram (ECG), electromyogram (EMG), electroencephalogram (EEG), electrocorticogram (ECoG), pressure, temperature, impedance, motion, and other types of signals.
Some signal monitors perform over-sampling of a wide band physiological signal and analyze selected portions of the signal via digital signal processing. This type of signal monitoring architecture is flexible in that it permits any selected frequency bands within the over-sampled wide band physiological signal to be digitally analyzed for information relating to particular symptoms or conditions. However, sampling of a wide band physiological signal may require large amounts of power consumption, computing, and memory. Therefore, medical devices with limited computing, memory and/or power capabilities, such as implantable medical devices, may not be well suited to this type of wide band signal monitoring architecture.
In general, the invention is directed to a frequency selective monitor and methods for monitoring physiological signals in one or more selected frequency bands. A frequency selective monitor may utilize a heterodyning, chopper-stabilized amplifier architecture to convert a selected frequency band to a baseband for analysis. The frequency selective monitor may be useful in a variety of therapeutic and/or diagnostic applications. As examples, a frequency selective signal monitor may be provided within a medical device or within a sensor coupled to a medical device. The physiological signal may be analyzed in one or more selected frequency bands to trigger delivery of patient therapy and/or recording of diagnostic information.
The frequency selective monitor may include a heterodyning circuit configured to convert a selected frequency band of the physiological signal to a baseband. The heterodyning circuit may modulate a physiological signal at a first frequency, amplify the modulated signal, and demodulate the amplified signal at a second frequency. The second frequency may be different from the first frequency. In particular, the second frequency may differ from the first frequency by an offset. The offset may correspond to a frequency within a selected frequency band, such as a center frequency of the selected frequency band. Demodulation of the amplified signal at the second frequency may substantially center the selected frequency band of the signal at baseband. For example, the center frequency of the selected frequency band may be substantially centered at DC, i.e., 0 Hz, facilitating analysis of the signal.
In some cases, a frequency selective monitor as described herein may be configured to monitor a single frequency band of the wide band physiological signal. In addition, or alternatively, the techniques may be capable of efficiently hopping frequency bands in order to monitor the signal in two or more frequency bands. The frequency selective monitor may generate a triggering signal that triggers at least one of controlling therapy or recording diagnostic information based on analysis of the signal in one frequency band or multiple frequency bands. Therapy may be controlled by initiating delivery of therapy and/or adjusting therapy parameters. Recording diagnostic information may include recording the physiological signal, one or more characteristics of the signal, or other information.
In one embodiment, the invention provides a physiological signal monitoring device comprising a physiological sensing element that receives a physiological signal, a heterodyning circuit configured to convert a selected frequency band of the physiological signal to a baseband, and a signal analysis unit that analyzes a characteristic of the signal in the selected frequency band.
In another embodiment, the invention provides a method for monitoring a physiological signal, the method comprising receiving a physiological signal, converting, with a heterodyning circuit, a selected frequency band of the physiological signal to a baseband, and analyzing a characteristic of the signal in the selected frequency band.
In a further embodiment, the invention provides a medical device comprising a physiological signal monitoring unit and a therapy delivery module. The physiological signal monitoring unit comprises a physiological sensing element that receives a physiological signal, a heterodyning circuit configured to covert a selected frequency band of the physiological signal to a baseband, and a signal analysis unit that analyzes a characteristic of the signal in the selected frequency band, and generates a trigger signal triggering control of therapy to the patient based on the analyzed characteristic. The therapy delivery module controls the therapy in response to the trigger signal.
Frequency selective monitoring of physiological signals using a heterodyning architecture as described in this disclosure may provide one or more advantages. For example, a physiological signal may be monitored with reduced power, computing and memory requirements relative to techniques that rely on oversampling of the wideband signal followed by digital signal processing. Consequently, frequency selective monitoring may be readily implemented in medical devices with small sizes and limited power, computing and memory capabilities, such as implantable medical devices. In addition, a frequency selective monitor may be readily configurable, allowing a user to select different frequency bands and change frequency bands manually or automatically.
The details of one or more embodiments of the invention are set forth in the accompanying drawings and the description below. Other features, objects, and advantages of the invention will be apparent from the description and drawings, and from the claims.
In general, the invention is directed to a frequency selective monitor and methods for monitoring physiological signals in one or more selected frequency bands. A frequency selective monitor may utilize a heterodyning, chopper-stabilized amplifier architecture to convert a selected frequency band to a baseband for analysis. The frequency selective monitor may be useful in a variety of therapeutic and/or diagnostic applications to monitor a variety of physiological signals, such as EEG, ECoG, ECG, EMG, pressure, temperature, impedance, motion, and other types of signals. For purposes of illustration, however, frequency selective monitors will be generally described with respect to monitoring and analysis of brain signals and, particularly, one or more selected frequency bands of EEG or ECoG signals, such as alpha, beta and gamma bands. Other examples of brain signals, in addition to EEG and ECoG signals, include local field potentials (LFP's) and single cell action potentials.
A frequency selective signal monitor may be provided within a medical device or within a sensor coupled to a medical device. The physiological signal may be analyzed in one or more selected frequency bands to trigger delivery of patient therapy and/or recording of diagnostic information. For example, a frequency selective monitor may be provided within or operate in conjunction with electrical stimulation devices, drug delivery devices, loop recorders, or the like, including external or implantable stimulators, drug delivery devices, or loop recorders. Other examples of therapy devices include devices configured to provide visual, audible or tactile cueing, e.g., to break akinesia such as gait freeze or other motor freezes.
Examples of stimulation devices include electrical stimulators configured for deep brain stimulation, spinal cord stimulation, gastric stimulation, cardiac stimulation, pelvic floor stimulation, peripheral nerve stimulation or the like. Therapeutic applications include, without limitation, delivery of stimulation to treat diseases or disorders such as chronic pain, epilepsy, Parkinson's disease, dystonia, tremor, akinesia, neuralgia, sleep dysfunction, depression, obsessive compulsive disorder, obesity, gastroparesis, urinary or fecal incontinence, sexual dysfunction or the like. For purpose of illustration, however, frequency selective monitors will be generally described with respect to electrical stimulation configured to treat neurological diseases or disorders such as Parkinson's, tremor, epilepsy, depression, obsessive compulsive disorder or the like.
A frequency selective monitor may include a heterodyning circuit configured to convert a selected frequency band of the physiological signal to a baseband. The heterodyning circuit may modulate a physiological signal at a first frequency, amplify the modulated signal, and demodulate the amplified signal at a second frequency. The second frequency may be different from the first frequency. In particular, the second frequency may differ from the first frequency by an offset. The offset may correspond to a frequency within a selected frequency band, such as a center frequency of the selected frequency band. Demodulation of the amplified signal at the second frequency may substantially center the selected frequency band of the signal at baseband. For example, the center frequency of the selected frequency band may be substantially centered at DC, i.e., 0 Hz, facilitating analysis of the signal.
A frequency selective monitor as described herein may be configured to monitor a single frequency band of the wide band physiological signal. In addition, or alternatively, the techniques may be capable of efficiently hopping frequency bands in order to monitor the signal in two or more frequency bands. The frequency selective monitor may generate a triggering signal that triggers at least one of controlling therapy or recording diagnostic information based on analysis of the signal in one frequency band or multiple frequency bands. Therapy may be controlled by initiating delivery of therapy and/or adjusting therapy parameters. Recording diagnostic information may include recording the physiological signal, one or more characteristics of the signal, or other information.
As described in this disclosure, a superheterodyne-based, frequency selective signal monitor may efficiently extract signal power or other characteristics from a signal in a selected frequency band that is determined to be physiologically relevant. Local field potentials in the brain are complex, but can be analyzed with frequency domain techniques. Many key neurological biomarker potentials are encoded as variations in spectral content. Symptoms or conditions may be detected or evaluated, for example, by sensing power or power fluctuations in specific frequency bands of wide band physiological signals, such as EEG signals or ECoG signals. For EEG and ECoG signals, physical location of one or more electrodes, as sensing elements, maps functionality (e.g., motor, sensory, or other functionality) and frequency bands within the signal captured at the physical location encode the activity relating to such functionality.
Neuronal activity can be measured with a number of techniques, ranging in resolution from recordings of single cell action potentials, to local field potentials (LFPs), to ECoG signals, to the measurement of gross cortical activity with an electroencephalogram (EEG). In general, chronic sensing may present several high level requirements. For example, chronic sensing of such field potentials via an implanted sensing device may require the ability to operate with less than 25 microwatts of power, sufficiently low noise to support sensing of biomarkers in the cortex having potentials of less than 10 microvolts rms, and a power supply rejection ratio (PSRR) of greater than 80 dB to reject noise from other sources, such as an electrical stimulator integrated with or in close proximity to the sensing device. If a sensing device is integrated with an implantable electrical stimulator, for example, the combined device may have a power requirement for stimulation therapy on the order of 500 microwatts, which may leave approximately 25 microwatts for sensing.
Low frequency power fluctuations of neuronal local field potentials (LFPs) within discrete frequency bands can provide useful biomarkers for discriminating normal physiological brain activity from pathological states. LFPs may provide a measurement of the average or composite field behavior of many cells surrounding an electrode. Because LFPs represent the ensemble activity of thousands to millions of cells in an in vivo neural population, their recording generally avoids chronic issues like tissue encapsulation and micromotion encountered in single-unit recording. LFP biomarkers are ubiquitous and span a broad frequency spectrum, from approximately 1 Hz oscillations in deep sleep to greater than approximately 500 Hz “fast ripples” in the hippocampus, and show a wide Q variation. As an example, high gamma band power fluctuations in the motor cortex may signal motion intent.
Hence, using higher frequency bandpower tracking from signals that may have been previously filtered out of surface EEG recording may be desirable. However, high frequency bandpower tracking may exacerbate problems associated with the use of digital processing to track key biomarkers, e.g., due to the power penalty of Nyquist sampling and high-rate digital processing. As the LFP biomarkers increase in frequency, their encoding can be efficiently obtained using a circuit architecture that directly extracts energy at key neuronal bands and tracks the relatively slow power fluctuations.
A frequency selective signal monitor as described herein may analyze brain signals, such as EEG or ECoG signals, in the alpha, beta, and/or gamma bands to detect brain activity relating to a particular disorder. For example, a frequency selective signal monitor may be used to track power ratios of brain signals in the beta and gamma bands, or monitor higher gamma bands, e.g., for analysis relating to Parkinson's disease or other movement disorders. For example, the balance between 25 Hz beta waves and 50 Hz gamma waves may be hypothesized as a biomarker for a disease state relating to a movement disorder. Desynchronization of mu (μ) waves (e.g., approximately 10 Hz) and an increase in power in high gamma waves (e.g., an increase of factor of four in 150 Hz waves) may also indicate a motion intent of the patient, i.e., an intent to move. As another example, a frequency selective signal monitor may be used to track desynchronization of alpha waves over the motor cortex, e.g., for analysis relating to Parkinson's disease or essential tremor. In this case, it may be possible to detect a patient intention for movement, permitting electrical stimulation or cueing to be delivered, e.g., to eliminate or reduce tremor or break akinesia. Implantable electrodes may be placed at selected locations within the brain and/or surface electrodes may be placed at selected locations on the head of the patient. In each case, the electrodes may be positioned to capture brain signals relating to particular functionality. As one example, electrodes may be positioned near the motor cortex to obtain signals indicative of movement. Analysis of one or more selected frequency bands, e.g., alpha, beta, gamma, in accordance with this disclosure then permits evaluation of different activity relating to such functionality.
As another example, a frequency selective signal monitor may track alpha wave balance between both hemispheres of the brain, e.g., as a biomarker for depression or compulsive behavior. A frequency selective signal monitor may trigger delivery of drug therapy or electrical stimulation to alleviate the depression. A frequency selective signal monitor may also identify a patient sleep state by monitoring the delta-theta-alpha-beta frequency bands in the EEG or ECoG of the patient to distinguish sleep stages of the patient and to trigger delivery of electrical stimulation to the patient during a REM sleep stage, e.g., to alleviate sleep dysfunction. For this example, the monitored frequency bands may fall in the ranges of approximately 1 Hz or lower (delta band), 4 to 8 Hz (theta band), 5 to 15 Hz (alpha band), and 15 to 35 Hz (beta band).
As a further example, a frequency selective signal monitor may identify epilepsy or onset of an epileptic seizure by monitoring a signal in the beta frequency band of the EEG or ECoG for the patient and trigger delivery of electrical stimulation to the patient to preempt, terminate, shorten or reduce severity of seizures. In addition, the frequency selective signal monitor may identify pain by monitoring a variety of frequency bands of the EEG or ECoG for the patient and trigger therapy, such as electrical stimulation or drug delivery, to the patient to alleviate the pain. Hence, a frequency selective monitor may be used for analysis relating to epilepsy, Parkinson's disease, tremor or other disorders, or to monitor other biomarker potentials in the cortex or elsewhere in selected frequency bands to detect patient pain or other patient sensations or activities.
Spectral encoding may be sensed to indicate other disease states or activities such as attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), olfaction activity, sleep states or the like. In these and other examples above, field potential bandpower fluctuations may encode key physiological information that can be used to identify particular disease states, neurological states or patient activity. The ability to sense signals across various bands using a frequency selective signal monitor in accordance with this disclosure may be very helpful in promoting effective therapy and diagnosis.
Neurological states are generally encoded in specific frequency bands. Modulation of the spectral energy may provide information on general activity such as sleep stages, alert state, motor processing, or the like, as well as pathological states such as seizures, band power hemispheric imbalance indicative of depression, and excess beta activity indicative of Parkinson's disease. Although this modulation may range from several tens of Hertz to hundreds of Hertz, many targeted therapies and diagnostic processes may require only low bandwidth tracking of energy in specific bands. Hence, in accordance with this disclosure, a template for physiological sensing, and particularly brain sensing, is demodulation of amplitude modulated (AM) signals, i.e., where physiological information is encoded in low frequency variations within a neurological carrier frequency.
Tracking power fluctuations in physiological bands may provide information to drive therapy delivery and/or recording. A frequency selective monitor can exploit the coding properties of neural signals while eliminating the need for rapid sampling of the wide-band signal, and associated computational, memory and power costs. The frequency selective monitor may reduce the output signal to a bandpower measurement in one or more cortical or neural frequency bands. Bandpower may generally refer to a power measurement for a signal within a selected frequency band. With a superheterodyne architecture, a chopper-stabilized amplifier can down-select a specific band using the non-linear signal processing in a chopper-stabilized amplifier such that the amplifier may operate similar to a superheterodyne radio receiver. By using direct down-modulation of neural signals, powered bandpass filters that would otherwise be needed to select the frequency band can be eliminated and replaced with passive filters drawing no power. In some embodiments, two parallel channels may combine the in-phase and quadrature signals to extract the full power of the neural signal at selected frequencies, which may be programmed in nonvolatile chip memory.
The techniques described in this disclosure for monitoring a physiological signal in a selected frequency band may provide several advantages. For example, the techniques may provide a fast signal monitoring solution with low power overhead. In particular, there may be no need for over-sampling of a wide band physiological signal above the Nyquist frequency, followed by digital signal processing to analyze the sampled data. Instead, a frequency selective monitor may be configured to amplify and process an analog signal in a selected frequency band without analog to digital conversion of the sampled wide band signal. In other cases, the output of the frequency selective monitor may be digitized, but after the signal has been reduced to a band power level. Therefore, the techniques may be implemented within medical devices with small form-factors and limited power capabilities, such as implantable medical devices. Furthermore, the techniques may provide a solution that is highly configurable and allows a user, such as a physician, technician, or patient, to determine the selected frequency band in which to monitor the physiological signal for symptoms or conditions of the patient. In some embodiments, a heterodyning chopper amplifier may permit chronic sensing of brain signals, extraction of key biomarker information, and feedback to control therapy with low power electronics.
A circuit architecture that directly extracts energy at key neuronal bands and tracks the relatively slow power fluctuations is useful to monitor signals characterized by biomarker encoding. By partitioning the neural interface for analog extraction of the relevant power fluctuations before digitization, the back-end requirements for sampling, algorithms, memory, and telemetry may be reduced. A chopper stabilized, superheterodyne architecture may function to track the frequency power for a broad spectrum of neuronal biomarkers. Such a circuit may be constructed to merge chopper-stabilization with heterodyne signal processing to construct a low-noise amplifier with highly programmable, robust filtering characteristics. In some embodiments, the architecture can be tuned for center band selectivity from dc to 500 Hz using on-chip clocks, while the filter bandwidth is programmable from 5 to 25 Hz using an on-chip passive third-order lowpass filter. The filter configuration may be maintained with on-chip non-volatile memory. In addition to processing frequency biomarkers, the architecture can adapted to measure complex electrode and tissue impedance by supplying a stimulation current across the inputs and disabling the input chopper modulation.
Chopper stabilized amplifiers can be adapted to also provide wide dynamic range, high-Q filters. Chopper stabilization is an efficient architecture for amplifying low-frequency neural signals in micropower applications. Displacement of modulation and demodulation clocks within the chopper amplifier permits direct translation of the frequency of the signal. For example, an up-modulator may be set to a first frequency. The resulting up-modulated signal is then centered about the first modulation frequency, which may be selected to be well above excess aggressor noise. Demodulation is then performed with a second clock of frequency equal to the first frequency plus or minus an offset δ. The net deconvolution of the signal and the demodulation frequency re-centers the signal to dc and two times the offset (2δ). Since biomarkers are encoded as low frequency fluctuations of the spectral power, it is possible to filter out the 2δ component with an on-chip lowpass filter with a bandwidth defined as BW/2. Signals on either side of δ are aliased into the net pass-band at the output signal. To first order, the heterodyned chopper may extract a band equivalent to a sixth-order bandpass filter with a scale factor penalty of 4/π2.
As illustrated in
In some embodiments, medical device 2 may comprise an implantable medical device capable of being implanted within the patient. In this case, sensing elements 7 may be positioned at a desired location within the patient to detect the physiological signal. Further, therapy delivery elements may be positioned at a desired location within the patient to deliver the therapy, such as electrical stimulation, drug delivery or internal audio or visual cueing. In other embodiments, medical device 2 may comprise an external medical device with sensing elements positioned at a desired location adjacent the patient to detect the physiological signal. In addition, therapy delivery elements 13 may be positioned at a desired location external to the patient to deliver the therapy, such as external audio, visual or tactile cueing via lights, displays, speakers, or the like.
Processor 4, frequency selective signal monitor 6, telemetry module 8, memory 10, and therapy delivery module 12 receive operating power from power source 3. Power source 3 may take the form of a small, rechargeable or non-rechargeable battery, or an inductive power interface that receives inductively coupled energy. In the case of a rechargeable battery, power source 3 similarly may include an inductive power interface for transfer of recharge power.
Processor 4 may include one or more microprocessors, microcontrollers, digital signal processors (DSPs), application specific integrated circuits (ASICs), field programmable gate array (FPGAs), discrete logic circuitry, or a combination of such components. Memory 10 may store therapy instructions that are available to be selected by processor 4 in response to receiving a patient therapy trigger from frequency selective signal monitor 6. In addition, processor 4 may be configured to record diagnostic information, such as sensed signals, signal characteristics, or the like in memory 10 or another memory or storage device. Memory 10 may include any combination of volatile, non-volatile, removable, magnetic, optical, or solid state media, such as read-only memory (ROM), random access memory (RAM), electronically-erasable programmable ROM (EEPROM), flash memory, or the like.
Frequency selective signal monitor 6 may form part of a sensor circuit 5 configured to monitor a variety of signals via a variety of different sensing elements 7, such as a pressure sensing element, an accelerometer, an activity monitor, an impedance monitor, an electrical signal monitor or other monitor configured to monitor heart sounds, brain signals, and/or other physiological signals. As an illustration, sensing elements 7 may comprise one or more electrodes located on a lead implanted at a target site within the patient and electrically coupled to sensor 5 via conductors. Frequency selective monitor 6 monitors the signals obtained by sensor circuit 5. Sensor circuit 5 may include suitable electrical interconnections to sensing elements and other components, as necessary. In some embodiments, frequency selective monitor 6 may directly process signals obtained from sensing elements 7 with little or no preprocessing by other components within sensor circuit 5. In other embodiments, sensor circuit 5 may include preprocessing circuitry to process or convert signals from sensing elements 7 for monitoring by frequency selective monitor 6.
A lead may carry one electrode or multiple electrodes, such as ring electrodes, segmented electrodes or electrodes arranged in a planar or non-planar array, e.g., on a paddle lead. Medical device 2 may be implantable or external. Such leads may carry sense electrodes or a combination of sense and stimulation electrodes. In some cases, different leads may be dedicated to sensing and stimulation functions. If external, medical device 2 may be coupled to one or more leads carrying sense and/or stimulation electrodes via a percutaneous extension. As a further illustration, sensing elements 7 may be surface electrodes suitable for placement on scalp, face, chest, or elsewhere on a patient, in which case such electrodes may be coupled to sensor circuit 5 via conductors within external leads. Sensing elements 7 may further comprise combinations of electrodes provided on one or more implantable leads and on or within a housing of medical device 2, or other electrode arrangements. Sensor circuitry associated with sensing elements 7 may be provided within frequency selective signal monitor 6.
In general, sensing elements 7 provide a measurement of a physiological signal associated with the patient by translating the signal to an output voltage or current. Frequency selective signal monitor 6 monitors the physiological signal in a selected frequency band without the need for rapid oversampling to digitize the signal. Instead, frequency selective signal monitor 6 may be configured to tune to a selected frequency band within the analog physiological signal. For example, frequency selective signal monitor 6 may be configured to modulate the wide band physiological signal at a first frequency, amplify the signal, demodulate the signal at a second, different frequency to baseband, extract the signal in a selected frequency band from the wide band physiological signal, and measure a characteristic of the extracted signal, such as power. In this way, the measured power may be used to determine whether frequency selective signal monitor 6 outputs a trigger signal to processor 4 to control therapy and/or record diagnostic information.
Processor 4 may receive the trigger signal and initiate delivery of therapy or adjust one or more therapy parameters specified in memory 10. Processor 4 outputs therapy instructions to therapy delivery module 12 to initiate or adjust delivery of therapy. Therapy delivery module 12 may include a stimulation generator that delivers stimulation therapy to the patient via therapy delivery elements 13 in response to receiving the therapy instructions. Therapy delivery elements 13 may be electrodes carried on one or more leads, electrodes on the housing of medical device 2, or electrodes on both a lead and the medical device housing. Alternatively, therapy delivery module 12 may include a fluid delivery device, such as a drug delivery device, including a fluid reservoir and one or more fluid delivery conduits. For cueing applications, therapy delivery module 12 may include one or more speakers, one or more lights, one or more display screens, or any combination thereof.
In some cases, as described above, therapy delivery module 12 may include a stimulation generator or other stimulation circuitry that delivers electrical signals, e.g., pulses or substantially continuous signals, such as sinusoidal signals, to the patient via at least some of the electrodes that form therapy delivery elements 13 under the control of the therapy instructions received from processor 4. Processor 4 may control therapy delivery module 12 to deliver electrical stimulation with pulse voltage or current amplitudes, pulse widths, and frequencies (i.e., pulse rates), and electrode combinations specified by the programs of the selected therapy instructions, e.g., as stored in memory 10. Processor 4 may also control therapy delivery module 12 to deliver each pulse, or a burst of pulses, according to a different program of the therapy instructions, such that multiple programs of stimulation are delivered an interleaved or alternating basis. In some embodiments, processor 4 may control therapy delivery module 12 to deliver a substantially continuous stimulation waveform rather than pulsed stimulation.
In other cases, as described above, therapy delivery module 12 may include a one or more fluid reservoirs and one or more pump units that pump fluid from the fluid reservoirs to the target site through the fluid delivery devices that form therapy delivery elements 13 under the control of the therapy instructions received from processor 4. For example, processor 4 may control which drugs are delivered and the dosage, rate and lockout interval of the drugs delivered. The fluid reservoirs may contain a drug or mixture of drugs. The fluid reservoirs may provide access for filling, e.g., by percutaneous injection of fluid via a self-sealing injection port. The fluid delivery devices may comprise, for example, fluid delivery conduits in the form of catheters that deliver, i.e., infuse or disperse, drugs from the fluid reservoirs to the same or different target sites.
In some cases, therapy delivery module 12 may include an audio signal generator, a visual signal, or a tactile stimulus (e.g., vibration) generator for cueing to disrupt akinesia or treat other conditions. Processor 4 may control therapy delivery module 12 to deliver audio, visual or tactile cueing with different parameters, such as amplitude, frequency, or the like, as specified by programs stored in memory 26.
Processor 4 also may control a telemetry module 8 to exchange information with an external programmer, such as a clinician programmer and/or patient programmer, by wireless, radio frequency (RF) telemetry. Processor 4 may control telemetry module 8 to communicate with the external programmer on a continuous basis, at periodic intervals, or upon request from the programmer. The programmer may, in turn, be connected to a computer that can program the device for algorithm and sensing adjustments, for issuing commands, for uplinking recorded loop data and for providing analysis. In addition, in some embodiments, telemetry module 8 may support wireless communication with one or more wireless sensors or sensing elements that sense physiological signals and transmit the signals to frequency selective signal monitor 6 by wireless transmission.
As illustrated in
Within sensor 14, frequency selective signal monitor 16 and telemetry module 18 receive operating power from power source 15. Within medical device 20, processor 22, telemetry module 24, memory 26, and therapy delivery module 28 receive operating power from power source 21. Power sources 15 and 21 may take the form of small, rechargeable or non-rechargeable batteries, or inductive power interfaces that receive inductively coupled energy. In the case of rechargeable batteries, power sources 15 and 21 similarly may include inductive power interfaces for transfer of recharge power.
In some embodiments, medical device 20 may comprise an implantable medical device capable of being implanted within the patient. Therapy delivery elements 29 may be positioned at a desired location within the patient to deliver the therapy, such as electrical stimulation, drug delivery, or internal audio or visual cueing. In one case, sensor 14 may comprise an external sensor capable of communicating with medical device 20, and sensing elements 17 may be positioned at a desired location adjacent to or on a surface of the patient to detect the physiological signal. In another case, sensor 14 may comprise an implantable sensor capable of communicating with medical device 20, and sensing elements 17 may be positioned at a desired location within the patient to detect the physiological signal.
In other embodiments, medical device 20 may comprise an external medical device with therapy delivery elements 29 positioned at a desired location external to the patient to deliver the therapy, such as external audio cueing or visual cueing. An external medical device alternatively may delivery therapy via percutaneous leads or conduits. In one case, sensor 14 may comprise an external sensor capable of communicating with medical device 20, and sensing elements 17 may be positioned at a desired location adjacent the patient to detect the physiological signal. In another case, sensor 14 may comprise an implantable sensor capable of communicating with medical device 20, and sensing elements 17 may be positioned at a desired location within the patient to detect the physiological signal.
In general, sensing elements 17 may provide a wide band physiological signal associated with the patient in the form of a voltage or current signal. Frequency selective signal monitor 16 monitors the physiological signal in a selected frequency band. As in the example of
As illustrated in
Adder 45 represents the inclusion of a noise signal with the modulated signal. Adder 45 represents the addition of low frequency noise, but does not form an actual component of instrumentation amplifier 32. Hence, there is no addition of explicit noise. Rather, adder 45 models the noise that comes into instrumentation amplifier 32 from non-ideal transistor characteristics. At adder 45, the original baseband components of the signal are located at the carrier frequency fc. The baseband components of the physiological signal may have a frequency within a range of 0 to less than or equal to approximately 1000 Hz, more particularly, 500 Hz, and still more particularly less than 100 Hz. The carrier frequency fc may be approximately 4 kHz to approximately 10 kHz. The noise signal enters the signal pathway at adder 45 to produce a noisy modulated signal. The noise signal may include 1/f noise, popcorn noise, offset, and any other external signals that may enter the signal pathway at low (baseband) frequency. At adder 45, however, the original baseband components of the signal have already been chopped to a higher frequency band by modulation of the physiological signal at the carrier frequency fc by first modulator 42. Thus, the low frequency noise signal is segregated from the original baseband components of the incoming physiological signal. The clock signal at frequency fc may be a square wave.
Amplifier 46 receives the noisy modulated input signal. Amplifier 46 amplifies the noisy modulated signal and outputs the amplified signal to a second modulator 47. In the example of
As shown in
The second feedback path is optional and includes an integrator 51, a fourth modulator 52, and high pass filter capacitance (Chp) 53. Integrator 51 integrates the output signal and modulator 52 modulates the output of integrator 51 at the carrier frequency. High pass filter capacitance (Chp) 53 may be selected to substantially eliminate components of the signal that have a frequency below the corner frequency of the high pass filter. For example, the second feedback path may set a corner frequency of approximately equal to 2.5 Hz, 0.5 Hz, or 0.05 Hz. The second feedback path may be provided to produce a feedback signal that is added to the original modulated signal at feedback adder 44. The second feedback path may act as a long term average or median filter to compensate for the long term behavior of the output signal (Vout). In other words, the second feedback path may subtract out or remove gradual drifts or other long-term behavior that occurs within the output signal.
A chopper-stabilized instrumentation amplifier, such as amplifier 32, may provide several advantages that make it useful for monitoring physiological signals. Three key benefits include an accurate monolithic high-pass corner, tight gain sensitivity, and low noise while operating at 1.8V. The accuracy of the high-pass filter in the second feedback path arises from the switched capacitor implementation. Since the high-pass filters are fully integrated, amplifier 46 can be scaled for large electrode arrays with minimal area penalty on the hybrid. In addition, the ability to digitally set the high-pass filter enables dynamic transient recovery post-therapy, as long as the states of the filter capacitors are preserved during transitions. The use of on-chip caps for the highpass filter also contributes to the tight sensitivity. The gain of amplifier 46 may be set by the ratio of two on-chip poly-poly caps. The low noise results from the core amplifier cell that eliminates the majority of 1/f noise and distributes currents efficiently, and the ability to provide significant gain in the front end to eliminate secondary stage contributions.
As illustrated in
Powered bandpass filter 34 extracts the signal in the selected frequency band. Power measurement module 36 then measures power of the extracted signal. In some cases, power measurement module 36 may extract the net power in the desired band by full wave rectification. In other cases, power measurement module 36 may extract the net power in the desired band by squaring power calculation. The measured power is then filtered by lowpass filter 37 and applied to comparator 40. A threshold tracker 38 may be provided to track fluctuations in power measurements of the selected frequency band over a period of time in order to generate a baseline power threshold of the selected frequency band for the patient. Threshold tracker 38 applies the baseline power threshold to comparator 40 in response to receiving the measured power from power measurement module 36.
Comparator 40 compares the measured power from lowpass filter 37 with the baseline power threshold from threshold tracker 38. If the measured power is greater than the baseline power threshold, comparator 40 may output a trigger signal to a processor of a medical device. The trigger signal may be a therapy trigger signal that controls therapy, e.g., by initiating therapy delivery or adjusting one or more therapy parameters. Alternatively, comparator 40 may output the trigger signal as a diagnostic recording trigger to cause a processor of the medical device to record the signal, a diagnostic event, or other information for later retrieval and evaluation. When the measured power of the signal in the selected frequency band is greater than the baseline power threshold of the selected frequency band, the increase in energy may signify a need for therapy. For example, a high-power signal in the targeted frequency may indicate the occurrence of an involuntary biomarker symptomatic of the patient's condition for which therapy is delivered. Low frequency power fluctuations of discrete frequency bands also may provide useful biomarkers for discriminating normal physiological brain activity from pathological states. As another example, a high-power signal in the targeted frequency may indicate the occurrence of a voluntary biomarker non-symptomatic of the patient's condition for which therapy is delivered. In other words, the signal may indicate one or more symptoms of a disease or disorder, or one or more activities or states of a patient, such as movement, sleep, activity, or the like.
If the measured power is equal to or less than the baseline power threshold, comparator 40 may output a power tracking measurement to threshold tracker 38, as indicated by the line from comparator 40 to threshold tracker 38. In this way, the measured power of the signal in the selected frequency band may be used by the threshold tracker 38 to update and generate the baseline power threshold of the selected frequency band for the patient. Threshold tracker 38 may include a median filter that creates the baseline threshold level after filtering the power of the signal in the selected frequency band for several minutes. Hence, the baseline power threshold may be dynamically adjusted as the sensed signal changes over time.
In some cases, frequency selective signal monitor 30 may be limited to monitoring a single frequency band of the wide band physiological signal at any specific instant or over time. Alternatively, frequency selective signal monitor 30 may be capable of efficiently hopping frequency bands in order to monitor the signal in a first frequency band, monitor the signal in a second frequency band, and then determine whether to trigger therapy and/or diagnostic recording based on some combination of the monitored signals. For example, different frequency bands may be monitored on an alternating basis to support signal analysis techniques that rely on comparison or processing of characteristics associated with multiple frequency bands.
Instrumentation amplifier 32A receives a physiological signal (Vin) associated with a patient from sensing elements, such as electrodes, positioned within or external to the patient to detect the physiological signal. First modulator 54 modulates the signal from baseband at the carrier frequency (fc). Adder 55 represents the addition of a noise signal to the modulated signal and amplifier 56 amplifies the noisy modulated signal. However, adder 55 is not an actual component of instrumentation amplifier 32A. Adder 55 models the noise that comes into instrumentation amplifier 32 from non-ideal transistor characteristics. Second modulator 57 modulates the noisy amplified signal at the carrier frequency (fc). In this way, the amplified signal is demodulated back to baseband and the noise signal is modulated at the carrier frequency fc.
Lowpass filter 58 then filters the majority of the modulated noise signal out of the demodulated signal and outputs a low-noise physiological signal (Vout). The low-noise physiological signal may then be input to signal analysis unit 33 from
In general, frequency selective signal monitor 70 provides a physiological signal monitoring device comprising a physiological sensing element that receives a physiological signal, and a heterodyning circuit configured to convert a selected frequency band of the physiological signal to a baseband. The heterodyning circuit may correspond to instrumentation amplifier 72 or portions thereof. In one example, the heterodyning circuit may include a modulator 82 that modulates the signal at a first frequency, an amplifier 86 that amplifies the modulated signal, and a demodulator 88 that demodulates the amplified signal at a second frequency different from the first frequency. The device further comprises a signal analysis unit 73 that analyzes a characteristic of the signal in the selected frequency band. The second frequency is selected such that the demodulator substantially centers a selected frequency band of the signal at a baseband.
The signal analysis unit 73 may comprise a passive lowpass filter 74 that filters the demodulated signal to extract the selected frequency band of the signal at the baseband. The second frequency may differ from the first frequency by an offset that is approximately equal to a center frequency of the selected frequency band. In one embodiment, the physiological signal is an electroencephalogram (EEG) signal and the selected frequency band is one of an alpha, beta or gamma frequency band of the EEG signal. The characteristic of the demodulated signal may be a power fluctuation of the signal in the selected frequency band. The signal analysis unit 73 may generate a signal triggering at least one of control of therapy to the patient or recording of diagnostic information when the power fluctuation exceeds a threshold.
In some embodiments, the selected frequency band comprises a first selected frequency band and the characteristic comprises a first power. The demodulator 88 demodulates the amplified signal at a third frequency different from the first and second frequencies. The third frequency being selected such that the demodulator 88 substantially centers a second selected frequency band of the signal at a baseband. The signal analysis unit 73 analyzes a second power of the signal in the second selected frequency band, and calculates a power ratio between the first power and the second power. The signal analysis unit 73 generates a signal triggering at least one of control of therapy to the patient or recording of diagnostic information based on the power ratio.
In the example of
The second frequency is different from the first frequency fc and is selected, via the offset δ, to position the demodulated signal in the selected frequency band at the baseband. In particular, the offset may be selected based on the selected frequency band. For example, the frequency band may be a frequency within the selected frequency band, such as a center frequency of the band.
If the selected frequency band is 5 to 15 Hz, for example, the offset δ may be the center frequency of this band, i.e., 10 Hz. In some embodiments, the offset δ may be a frequency elsewhere in the selected frequency band. However, the center frequency generally will be preferred. The second frequency may be generated by shifting the first frequency by the offset amount. Alternatively, the second frequency may be generated independently of the first frequency such that the difference between the first and second frequencies is the offset.
In either case, the second frequency may be equivalent to the first frequency fc plus or minus the offset δ. If the first frequency fc is 4000 Hz, for example, and the selected frequency band is 5 to 15 Hz (the alpha band for EEG signals), the offset δ may be selected as the center frequency of that band, i.e., 10 Hz. In this case, the second frequency is the first frequency of 4000 Hz plus or minus 10 Hz. Using the superheterodyne structure, the signal is modulated at 4000 Hz by modulator 82, amplified by amplifier 86 and then demodulated by demodulator 88 at 3990 or 4010 Hz (the first frequency fc of 4000 Hz plus or minus the offset δ of 10 Hz) to position the 5 to 15 Hz band centered at 10 Hz at baseband, e.g., DC. In this manner the 5 to 15 Hz band can be directly downconverted such that it is substantially centered at DC.
As illustrated in
Adder 85 represents the inclusion of a noise signal with the modulated signal. Adder 85 represents the addition of low frequency noise, but does not form an actual component of superheterodyne instrumentation amplifier 72. Adder 85 models the noise that comes into superheterodyne instrumentation amplifier 72 from non-ideal transistor characteristics. At adder 85, the original baseband components of the signal are located at the carrier frequency fc. As an example, the baseband components of the signal may have a frequency within a range of 0 to approximately 1000 Hz and the carrier frequency fc may be approximately 4 kHz to approximately 10 kHz. The noise signal enters the signal pathway, as represented by adder 85, to produce a noisy modulated signal. The noise signal may include 1/f noise, popcorn noise, offset, and any other external signals that may enter the signal pathway at low (baseband) frequency. At adder 85, however, the original baseband components of the signal have already been chopped to a higher frequency band, e.g., 4000 Hz, by first modulator 82. Thus, the low-frequency noise signal is segregated from the original baseband components of the signal.
Amplifier 86 receives the noisy modulated input signal from adder 85. Amplifier 86 amplifies the noisy modulated signal and outputs the amplified signal to a second modulator 88. Offset (δ) 87 may be tuned such that it is approximately equal to a frequency within the selected frequency band, and preferably the center frequency of the selected frequency band. The resulting modulation frequency (fc±δ) used by demodulator 88 is then different from the first carrier frequency fc by the offset amount δ. In some cases, offset δ 87 may be manually tuned according to the selected frequency band by a physician, technician, or the patient. In other cases, the offset δ 87 may by dynamically tuned to the selected frequency band in accordance with stored frequency band values. For example, different frequency bands may be scanned by automatically or manually tuning the offset δ according to center frequencies of the desired bands.
As an example, when monitoring akinesia, the selected frequency band may be the alpha frequency band (5 Hz to 15 Hz). In this case, the offset δ may be approximately the center frequency of the alpha band, i.e., 10 Hz. As another example, when monitoring tremor, the selected frequency band may be the beta frequency band (15 Hz-35 Hz). In this case, the offset δ may be approximately the center frequency of the beta band, i.e., 25 Hz. As another example, when monitoring intent in the cortex, the selected frequency band may be the high gamma frequency band (150 Hz-200 Hz). In this case, the offset δ may be approximately the center frequency of the high gamma band, i.e., 175 Hz. When monitoring pre-seizure biomarkers in epilepsy, the selected frequency may be fast ripples (200 Hz-500 Hz), in which case the offset δ may be approximately 500 Hz. As another illustration, the selected frequency band passed by filter 34 may be the gamma band (30 Hz-80 Hz), in which case the offset δ may be tuned to approximately the center frequency of the gamma band, i.e., 55 Hz.
Hence, the signal in the selected frequency band may be produced by selecting the offset (δ) 87 such that the carrier frequency plus or minus the offset frequency (fc±δ) is equal to a frequency within the selected frequency band, such as the center frequency of the selected frequency band. In each case, as explained above, the offset may be selected to correspond to the desired band. For example, an offset of 5 Hz would place the alpha band at the baseband frequency, e.g., DC, upon downconversion by the demodulator. Similarly, an offset of 15 Hz would place the beta band at DC upon downconversion, and an offset of 30 Hz would place the gamma band at DC upon downconversion. In this manner, the pertinent frequency band is centered at the baseband. Then, passive low pass filtering may be applied to select the frequency band. In this manner, the superheterodyne architecture serves to position the desired frequency band at baseband as a function of the selected offset frequency used to produce the second frequency for demodulation. In general, in the example of
With further reference to
As shown in
Compensation of the feedback path in the mixer amplifier may be achieved in several ways. The output stage of the amplifier may serve as an integrator for stabilizing the feedback path. Since the modulation in the chopper amplifier is correlated with that in the feedback path, the overall feedback path can be compensated by using a compensation capacitor, such as a 16 pF compensation capacitor, for example. In some embodiments, the compensation capacitor may stabilize the amplifier as an equivalent first-order system and the amplifier gain may eliminate the need for a compensation to zero. In one embodiment, a target bandwidth of 1 kHz may be selected and the feedback path may be scaled to achieve an equivalent gain ratio of 100. In such a case, a 0.4 heterodyning scale factor results from the clock differential between the input and feedback paths, but is not part of the synchronous closed-loop path and does not need to be included in that loop. In some embodiments, an additional feedback path similar to the second feedback path denoted by components 51, 52 and 53 illustrated in
As described above, chopper-stabilized, superheterodyne instrumentation amplifier 72 can be used to achieve direct downconversion of a selected frequency band centered at a frequency that is offset from baseband by an amount δ. Again, if the alpha band is centered at 10 Hz, then the offset amount 6 used to produce the demodulation frequency fc±δ may be 10 Hz. As illustrated in
Superheterodyne instrumentation amplifier 72 may operate under the concept of balancing an up-modulated charge from the differential input voltage with an upmodulated feedback charge, such that the net gain for the amplifier is set by the relative scaling of the input and feedback capacitors. As described above, the front end modulation clock may run on a clock signal independent from the demodulation amplifier and the feedback network. Thus, with amplification set by on-chip capacitor ratios, the relative clock difference, δ, between the two clocks translates the relative frequency of the input signal by an equivalent amount to achieve the desired heterodyning transfer function:
where Cin represents the input capacitance value, Cfb represents the feedback capacitance value, n represents the harmonic order, f represents the carrier frequency, δ represents the frequency offset value, φ represents the phase between the demodulator clock and the physiological signal input, Vin represents the physiological signal input, and Vout represents the output of the instrumentation amplifier. In some embodiments, the ratio of input and feedback capacitances may be set to 20 pF/200 fF in order to provide 32 dB of gain. As illustrated in
Comparator 80 compares the measured power from lowpass filter 77 with the baseline power threshold from threshold tracker 78. If the measured power is greater than the baseline power threshold, comparator 80 may output a trigger signal to a processor of a medical device to control therapy and/or recording of diagnostic information, e.g., as described with reference to
As described with reference to
In some cases, multiple bandpower ratios could be analyzed, e.g., a first bandpower ratio between first and second bands plus a second bandpower ratio between first and third, second and third, or third and fourth bands, where the bands are overlapping or non-overlapping. Alternatively, or additionally, signal analysis unit 73A may be configured to select different bands for measurement. For example, signal analysis unit 73A may analyze a signal in a first selected frequency band to determine whether an event is indicated, e.g., by a deviation of bandpower from a threshold level. Then, if the signal in the first selected frequency band indicates an event, signal analysis unit 73A may analyze a signal in a second selected frequency band to confirm or validate the event before generating a trigger signal.
Alternatively, or additionally, signal analysis unit 73A may generate the trigger signal based on the measurement in the first selected frequency band and then proceed to analyze the signal in the second selected frequency band to determine whether to generate another trigger signal relating to another phase of therapy or data recording. Likewise, signal analysis unit 73A may selectively tune to different combinations of multiple bands to measure bandpower ratios to identify an event to generate a trigger signal, validate an event before generating a trigger signal, and/or generate a trigger signal followed by analysis of different bandpower ratios to determine whether to generate a trigger signal for the next phase of therapy or data recording. When tracking sleep and sleep states, as one example, it may be helpful to analyze bandpower fluctuations along a well-defined trajectory.
As another feature, signal analysis unit 73A may be configured to shift between a bandpower measurement mode in which power measurements are made based on offset delta and BW/2 that are focused on a band, and a raw signal analysis mode in which the raw signal is amplified for analysis. For example, signal analysis unit 73A may switch modes to analyze a raw EEG signal, e.g., to identify biomarkers during research or at the beginning of operation of an implantable stimulator. As an illustration, signal analysis unit 73A may be used to define seizure characteristics for a patient using raw EEG recording.
The raw EEG recording may be digitized and analyzed using a digital signal processor (DSP) or other digital processing device to analyze the signal for biomarkers. Once a pertinent frequency biomarker is identified, the bandpower measurement mode may be activated to add the offset delta shift and lowpass filter to implement the superheterodyne process for efficient low power operation. In this case, signal analysis unit 73A may operate in an initial mode to digitally analyze raw EEG signals and identify one or more biomarkers, and then transition to a second mode using the superheterodyne architecture to track events associated with the biomarkers, such as bandpower. The first mode may be a higher power mode, while the second, superheterodyne mode may be a lower power mode.
As another example, for epilepsy, signal analysis unit 73A may initially operate in a first mode that uses the superheterodyne architecture. If an event is detected in the first mode, then signal analysis unit 73A may transition to a second mode in which the raw EEG signal is digitally analyzed or recorded. In this case, the first mode using the superheterodyne architecture may be a lower power mode and the second mode involving digital analysis and/or loop recording may be a higher power mode. Features for switching between different bands or modes, as described above, may be generally applicable to signal analysis units 33, 73 and 73A or other signal analysis units similar to those described in this disclosure.
As illustrated in
Signal analysis unit 73A receives a first output signal from an instrumentation amplifier, such as instrumentation amplifier 72 from
In the example of
Comparator 80A compares the measured power of the first signal from lowpass filter 77A with the measured power from the second signal from lowpass filter 77B. If the power ratio of the first and second signals is greater than a baseline power ratio threshold, comparator 80A may output a trigger signal to a processor of a medical device to control therapy and/or recording of diagnostic information, e.g., as described with reference to
Superheterodyne instrumentation amplifier 72A receives a physiological signal (Vin) associated with a patient from sensing elements, such as electrodes, positioned within or external to the patient to detect the physiological signal. First modulator 95 modulates the signal from baseband at the carrier frequency (fc). A noise signal is added to the modulated signal, as represented by adder 96. Amplifier 97 amplifies the noisy modulated signal. Frequency offset 98 is tuned such that the carrier frequency plus or minus frequency offset 98 (fc±δ) is equal to the selected frequency band. Hence, the offset δ may be selected to target a desired frequency band. Second modulator 99 modulates the noisy amplified signal at offset frequency 98 from the carrier frequency fc. In this way, the amplified signal in the selected frequency band is demodulated directly to baseband and the noise signal is modulated to the selected frequency band.
Lowpass filter 100 may filter the majority of the modulated noise signal out of the demodulated signal and set the effective bandwidth of its passband around the center frequency of the selected frequency band. As illustrated in the detail associated with lowpass filter 100 in
For example, if the selected frequency band is 5 to 15 Hz, for example, the offset δ may be the center frequency of this band, i.e., 10 Hz, and the effective bandwidth may be half the full bandwidth of the selected frequency band, i.e., 5 Hz. In this case, lowpass filter 100 rejects or at least attenuates signals above 5 Hz, thereby limiting the passband signal to the alpha band, which is centered at 0 Hz as a result of the superheterodyne process. Hence, the center frequency of the selected frequency band can be specified with the offset δ, and the bandwidth BW of the passband can be obtained independently with the lowpass filter 100, with BW/2 about each side of the center frequency.
Lowpass filter 100 then outputs a low-noise physiological signal (Vout). The low-noise physiological signal may then be input to signal analysis unit 73 from
A superheterodyning, chopper-stabilized amplifier, as described in this disclosure, may be used to extract bandpower measurements at key physiological frequencies, with an architecture that is flexible, robust and low-noise. The amplifier merges heterodyning and chopper stabilization for flexible bandpass selection. The addition of a relative clock shift δ selects the center of the band, while a lowpass filter sets the bandpass width. A chopper stabilized amplifiers may provide wide dynamic range, high-Q filter. Chopper stabilization is a noise/power efficient architecture for amplifying low-frequency neural signals in micropower applications with excellent process immunity.
By displacing the clocks within the chopper amplifier to translate the frequency of the signal, the amplifier can readily tune to particular frequency bands. For example, the up-modulator can set to one frequency, Fclk. At the input to the mixer amplifier, the signal is then centered about the Fclk modulation frequency, well above excess aggressor noise. Demodulation may be performed with a second clock of frequency Fclk=Fclk+δ. The net deconvolution of the signal and the demodulation clock re-centers the signal to dc and 2δ at the output of the demodulator.
Since biomarkers may be encoded as low frequency fluctuations of the spectral power, a low pass filter can be used to filter out the 2δ component. For example, the filter may be realized by an on-chip, two-pole, lowpass filter with a bandwidth defined as BW/2, where BW represents the bandwidth of the target frequency band. Signals on either side of δ are aliased into the net pass-band at VOUT. The heterodyning chopper-stabilized amplifier may suppress harmonics as the square of the harmonic order, to yield a net output at signal Vout that may be represented by the following equation:
where n denotes the harmonic order, f represents frequency, δ represents the delta offset applied to the modulation clock frequency, and φ is the phase between the δ clock and the physiological signal input. The heterodyned chopper-stabilized amplifier extracts a band equivalent to a second-order bandpass filter with a scale factor of 4/π2. The center frequency can be set by a programmable clock difference, which is simple to synthesize on-chip, while the bandwidth (and Q) can be set independently by a programmable lowpass filter. In some embodiments, the programmable lowpass filter may have a quasi-Gaussian profile.
An analog implementation may use an on-chip self-cascoded Gilbert mixer to calculate the sum of squares, as mentioned above. Alternatively, a digital approach may take advantage of the low bandwidth of the I and Q channels after lowpass filtering, and digitize at that point in the signal chain for digital power computation. Digital computation at the I/Q stage has advantages. For example, power extraction is more linear than a tanh function. In addition, digital computation simplifies offset calibration to suppress distortion, and preserves the phase information for cross-channel coherence analysis. With either technique, a sum of squares in the two channels can eliminate the phase sensitivity between the physiological signal and the modulation clock frequency. The power output signal can lowpass filtered to the order of 1 Hz to track the essential dynamics of a desired biomarker.
Superheterodyne instrumentation amplifier 72B illustrated in
Superheterodyne instrumentation amplifier 72B receives a physiological signal (Vin) associated with a patient from one or more sensing elements. The in-phase (I) signal path modulates the signal from baseband at the carrier frequency (fc), permits addition of a noise signal to the modulated signal, and amplifies the noisy modulated signal. In-phase frequency offset 123 may be tuned such that it is substantially equivalent to a center frequency of a selected frequency band. For the alpha band (5 to 15 Hz), for example, the offset 123 may be approximately 10 Hz. In this example, if the modulation carrier frequency fc applied by modulator 120 is 4000 Hz, then the demodulation frequency fc±δ may be 3990 Hz or 4010 Hz.
Second modulator 124 modulates the noisy amplified signal at a frequency (fc±δ) offset from the carrier frequency fc by the offset amount δ. In this way, the amplified signal in the selected frequency band may be demodulated directly to baseband and the noise signal may be modulated up to the second frequency fc±δ. The selected frequency band of the physiological signal is then substantially centered at baseband, e.g., DC. For the alpha band (5 to 15 Hz), for example, the center frequency of 10 Hz is centered at 0 Hz at baseband. Lowpass filter 125 filters the majority of the modulated noise signal out of the demodulated signal and outputs a low-noise physiological signal. The low-noise physiological signal may then be squared with squaring unit 126 and input to adder 136. In some cases, squaring unit 126 may comprise a self-cascoded Gilbert mixer. The output of squaring unit 126 represents the spectral power of the in-phase signal.
In a similar fashion, the quadrature (Q) signal path modulates the signal from baseband at the carrier frequency (fc). The Q signal path permits addition of a noise signal to the modulated signal, as represented by adder 129, and amplifies the noisy modulated signal via amplifier 130. Again, quadrature offset frequency (δ) 131 may be tuned such that it is approximately equal to the center frequency of the selected frequency band. As a result, the demodulation frequency applied to demodulator 132 is (fc±δ). In the quadrature signal path, however, an additional phase shift of 90 degrees is added to the demodulation frequency for demodulator 132. Hence, the demodulation frequency for demodulator 132, like demodulator 124, is fc±δ. However, the demodulation frequency for demodulator 132 is phase shifted by 90 degrees relative to the demodulation frequency for demodulator 124 of the in-phase signal path.
Fourth modulator 132 modulates the noisy amplified signal at the quadrature frequency 131 from the carrier frequency. In this way, the amplified signal in the selected frequency band is demodulated directly to baseband and the noise signal is modulated at the demodulation frequency fc±δ. Lowpass filter 133 filters the majority of the modulated noise signal out of the demodulated signal and outputs a low-noise physiological signal. The low-noise physiological signal may then be squared and input to adder 136. Like squaring unit 126, squaring unit 134 may comprise a self-cascoded Gilbert mixer. The output of squaring unit 134 represents the spectral power of the quadrature signal.
Adder 136 combines the signals output from squaring unit 126 in the in-phase signal path and squaring unit 134 in the quadrature signal path. The output of adder 136 may be input to a lowpass filter 137 that generates a low-noise, phase-insensitive output signal (Vout). In one example embodiment, lowpass filter 127 may be programmable and configured to achieve a net power output between approximately 1 and 10 Hz, and to achieve a net gain on the order of 1V/V2 with a nominal input signal of 10 mV into the block, with a 120 nA total bias.
As described above, the signal may be input to signal analysis unit 73 from
The spectral density of a signal may derived from the conjugate product of the Fourier transform which includes a windowing function ‘w(t)’ that reflects the bandwidth BW of interest according to the following equation:
Expanding out the spectral power φ(f) using Euler's identity demonstrates that the net energy can be measured by the superposition of two orthogonal signal sources representing an ‘in-phase’ and ‘quadrature’ signal. The expanded spectral power φ(f) is given according to the following equation:
Both terms are considered since the phase relationship between the neural circuit and the interface IC are not correlated.
An analog signal chain for flexible spectral analysis can be designed according to Equation (4). In addition to achieving significant amplification of the signals, the input neural signal may be multiplied by a sine and cosine term at the bandcenter, δ, and then windowed or otherwise set the effective BW. The resulting signals may be squared and then added together with a final lowpass filter prior to digitization. A modified chopper amplifier may assist in performing the linear multiplication of the neural signal and the tone at δ in order to achieve both robust amplification and spectral extraction that is both highly flexible and robust to process variations.
The nonlinear properties of a chopper amplifier can be exploited for spectral analysis. Chopper stabilization can provide a noise- and power-efficient architecture for amplifying low-frequency neural signals in micropower biomedical applications. Moreover, chopper stabilized amplifiers can be adapted to provide wide dynamic range, high-Q filters.
As demonstrated by Equation (4), the net spectral power is extracted by superimposing an in-phase and quadrature channel. Since the physiological signal and the integrated circuit (IC) clocks are uncorrelated, a phase offset may occur between the signals. The superposition of the in-phase and quadrature channels in superheterodyne chopper amplifier 72B of
where n represents the harmonic order, f represents the carrier frequency, δ represents the frequency offset value, and φ represents the phase between the demodulator clock and the physiological signal input. Since the signal power falls off with a 1/f law, the net power of the physiological signals at the third harmonic are effectively attenuated so that acceptable selectivity can be maintained with respect to the key band of interest. In some embodiments, a notched clock strategy may be used to drive the heterodyning choppers in order to suppress higher-order harmonic content. This can allow for even greater harmonic suppression.
To achieve low power, an analog implementation may use an on-chip self-cascoded Gilbert mixer to calculate the sum of squares by superimposing currents. To prevent residual offsets in the tanh circuits from creating modulation products in the I and Q channels, the inputs to the Gilbert multipliers may be chopped with a 64 Hz square wave. The power output signal can be lowpass filtered to the order of 1 Hz to track the essential dynamics of the biomarker, easing resource requirements in the digital processing blocks.
In addition to bandpower extraction, a heterodyning chopper-stabilized amplifier may have several uses when the clock difference, (δ), is set to zero. One application is to measure a standard time-domain neural signal without preprocessing, which can be useful for prescreening waveforms to identify spectral biomarkers of interest and to confirm algorithm functionality. Another application is to measure impedance with the addition of current stimulation injected across electrodes at the chopper clock frequency, and fixing the state of the front-end modulators, as will be described. Tapping the signal output of the in-phase channel then provides the real component of the impedance, while the output of the quadrature port is the complex impedance. This measurement can be useful for characterizing electrodes and tissue properties as well as properties of the electrode/tissue interface.
Frequency selective signal monitor 30 receives a physiological signal associated with a patient (140). First modulator 42 modulates the physiological signal from baseband at the carrier frequency (142). Adder 45 represents the addition of a low-band noise signal with the modulated signal (143). Amplifier 46 amplifies the noisy modulated signal (144). Second modulator 47 then demodulates the signal at the carrier frequency to position the input physiological signal at baseband (145). Integrator 48 applies a lowpass filter to the demodulated signal to remove excess noise from the demodulated signal (146). Instrumentation amplifier 32 then outputs a low-noise physiological signal to signal analysis unit 33.
Powered bandpass filter 34 within signal analysis unit 33 may be tuned to a selected frequency band (148). In some cases, powered bandpass filter 34 may be manually tuned to the selected frequency band by a physician, technician, or the patient. In other cases, the powered bandpass filter 34 may by dynamically tuned to the selected frequency band in accordance with stored frequency band values. Powered bandpass filter 34 is applied to the low-power physiological signal output from instrumentation amplifier 32 to extract the signal in the selected frequency band from the wide band physiological signal (150). Power measurement module 36 measures the power of the extracted signal (152).
The measured power is then filtered by lowpass filter 37 and applied to comparator 40. Threshold tracker 38 tracks fluctuations in power measurements of the selected frequency band for the patient over a period of time. In this way, threshold tracker 38 generates a baseline power threshold of the selected frequency band for the patient based on the fluctuations. Comparator 40 compares the measured power to the baseline power threshold of the selected frequency band for the patient (154). If the measured power is greater than the baseline power threshold (YES branch of 155), comparator 40 outputs a trigger signal (158) to a processor of a medical device. If the measured power is less than the baseline power threshold (NO branch of 155), the comparator 40 outputs a power tracking measurement to threshold tracker 38 to generate the baseline power threshold and does not generate the trigger signal (156). In either case, after comparator 40 determines whether to generate the trigger signal, frequency selective signal monitor 30 continues to monitor the wide band physiological signal associated with the patient (140).
Frequency selective signal monitor 70 receives a physiological signal associated with a patient (160). Modulator 82 modulates the physiological signal from baseband at the carrier frequency (162). Adder 85 represents addition of a low-band noise signal with the modulated signal (163). Amplifier 86 amplifies the noisy modulated signal (164). Frequency offset 87 is tuned such that it substantially corresponds to a center frequency of the selected frequency band. Demodulator 88 then demodulates the signal in directly to baseband at the carrier frequency plus or minus the frequency offset (166). Integrator 89 applies a lowpass filter to the demodulated signal to remove excess noise from the demodulated signal (167). Superheterodyne instrumentation amplifier 72 then outputs a low-noise physiological signal to signal analysis unit 73.
Passive lowpass filter 74 within signal analysis unit 73 is applied to the low-noise physiological signal from superheterodyne instrumentation amplifier 72 to extract the signal in the selected frequency band positioned at baseband from the wide band physiological signal (168). Power measurement module 76 measures power of the extracted signal (170). The measured power is then filtered by lowpass filter 77 and applied to comparator 80. Threshold tracker 78 tracks fluctuations in power measurements of the selected frequency band for the patient over a period of time. Again, in this way, threshold tracker 78 may generate a baseline power threshold of the selected frequency band for the patient based on the fluctuations.
Comparator 80 compares the current power to the baseline power threshold in order to identify a need for patient therapy (172). If the current power is greater than the baseline power threshold (YES branch of 173), comparator 80 generates a trigger signal (176). If the current power is less than the baseline power threshold (NO branch of 173), the comparator 80 does not generate a trigger signal (174). In either case, after comparator 80 determines whether patient therapy has been triggered, frequency selective signal monitor 70 continues to monitor the wide band physiological signal associated with the patient (160).
The techniques described herein for monitoring a physiological signal in a selected frequency band without rapid signal sampling may provide several advantages. For example, the techniques may provide a fast signal monitoring solution with low power, computing and memory overhead. Therefore, the techniques may be implemented within medical devices with small form-factors and limited power, computing and memory capabilities, such as implantable medical devices. Furthermore, the techniques may provide a solution that is highly configurable and allows a user, such as a physician, technician, or patient, to select the frequency band in which to monitor the physiological signal for symptoms or conditions of the patient.
Mixer amplifier circuit 200 amplifies a noisy modulated input signal to produce an amplified signal and demodulates the amplified signal. Mixer amplifier circuit 200 also substantially eliminates noise from the demodulated signal to generate the output signal. In the example of
Switches 202 are driven by chop logic to support the chopping of the amplified signal for demodulation at the chop frequency. In particular, switches 202 demodulate the amplified signal and modulate front-end offsets and 1/f noise. Switches 204 are embedded within a self-biased cascode mirror formed by transistors M6, M7, M8 and M9, and are driven by chop logic to up-modulate the low frequency errors from transistors M8 and M9. Low frequency errors in transistors M6 and M7 are attenuated by source degeneration from transistors M8 and M9. The output of mixer amplifier circuit 200 is at baseband, allowing an integrator formed by transistor M10 and capacitor 206 (Ccomp) to stabilize a feedback path (not shown in
In the example of
In this example, approximately 100 nA of current is pulled through each leg of the demodulator section. The AC current at the chop frequency from transistors M1 and M2 also flows through the legs of the demodulator. Switches 202 alternate the current back and forth between the legs of the demodulator to demodulate the measurement signal back to baseband, while the offsets from the transconductor are up-modulated to the chopper frequency. As discussed previously, transistors M6, M7, M8 and M9 form a self-biased cascode mirror, and make the signal single-ended before passing into the output integrator formed by transistor M10 and capacitor 206 (Ccomp). Switches 204 placed within the cascode (M6-M9) upmodulate the low frequency errors from transistors M8 and M9, while the low frequency errors of transistor M6 and transistor M7 are suppressed by the source degeneration they see from transistors M8 and M9. Source degeneration also keeps errors from Bias N2 transistors 208 suppressed. Bias N2 transistors M12 and M13 form a common gate amplifier that presents a low impedance to the chopper switching and passes the signal current to transistors M6 and M7 with immunity to the voltage on the drains.
The output DC signal current and the upmodulated error current pass to the integrator, which is formed by transistor M10, capacitor 206, and the bottom NFET current source transistor M11. Again, this integrator serves to both stabilize the feedback path and filter out the upmodulated error sources. The bias for transistor M10 may be approximately 100 nA, and is scaled compared to transistor M8. The bias for lowside NFET M11 may also be approximately 100 nA (sink). As a result, the integrator is balanced with no signal. If more current drive is desired, current in the integration tail can be increased appropriately using standard integrate circuit design techniques. The transistors in the example of
In the example of
The differential input voltage signals are connected to respective capacitors 83A and 83B (collectively referred to as “capacitors 83”) through switches 212A and 212B, respectively. Switches 212A and 212B may collectively form modulator 82 of
In
Switches 212A, 212B toggle in-phase with one another to provide a differential input signal to amplifier 86. During one phase of the clock signal fc, switch 212A connects Vin+ to capacitor 83A and switch 212B connects Vin− to capacitor 83B. During another phase, switches 212A, 212B change state such that switch 212A decouples Vin+from capacitor 83A and switch 212B decouples Vin−from capacitor 83B. Switches 212A, 212B synchronously alternate between the first and second phases to modulate the differential voltage at the carrier frequency. The resulting chopped differential signal is applied across capacitors 83A, 83B, which couple the differential signal across the positive and negative inputs of amplifier 86.
Resistors 214A and 214B (collectively referred to as “resistors 214”) may be included to provide a DC conduction path that controls the voltage bias at the input of amplifier 86. In other words, resistors 214 may be selected to provide an equivalent resistance that is used to keep the bias impedance high. Resistors 214 may, for example, be selected to provide a 5 GΩ equivalent resistor, but the absolute size of the equivalent resistor is not critical to the performance of instrumentation amplifier 210. In general, increasing the impedance improves the noise performance and rejection of harmonics, but extends the recovery time from an overload. To provide a frame of reference, a 5 GΩ equivalent resistor results in a referred-to-input (RTI) noise of approximately 20 nV/rt Hz with an input capacitance (Cin) of approximately 25 pF. In light of this, a stronger motivation for keeping the impedance high is the rejection of high frequency harmonics which can alias into the signal chain due to settling at the input nodes of amplifier 86 during each half of a clock cycle.
Resistors 214 are merely exemplary and serve to illustrate one of many different biasing schemes for controlling the signal input to amplifier 86. In fact, the biasing scheme is flexible because the absolute value of the resulting equivalent resistance is not critical. In general, the time constant of resistor 214 and input capacitor 83 may be selected to be approximately 100 times longer than the reciprocal of the chopping frequency.
Amplifier 86 may produce noise and offset in the differential signal applied to its inputs. For this reason, the differential input signal is chopped via switches 212A, 212B and capacitors 83A, 83B to place the signal of interest in a different frequency band from the noise and offset. Then, instrumentation amplifier 210 chops the amplified signal at modulator 88 a second time to demodulate the signal of interest down to baseband while modulating the noise and offset up to the chop frequency band. In this manner, instrumentation amplifier 210 maintains substantial separation between the noise and offset and the signal of interest.
Modulator 88 may support direct downconversion of the selected frequency band using a superheterodyne process. In particular, modulator 88 may demodulate the output of amplifier 86 at a frequency equal to the carrier frequency fc used by switches 212A, 212B plus or minus an offset δ that is substantially equal to the center frequency of the selected frequency band. In other words, modulator 88 demodulates the amplified signal at a frequency of fc±δ. Integrator 89 may be provided to integrate the output of modulator 88 to produce output signal Vout. Amplifier 86 and differential feedback path branches 216A, 216B process the noisy modulated input signal to achieve a stable measurement of the low frequency input signal output while operating at low power.
Operating at low power tends to limit the bandwidth of amplifier 86 and creates distortion (ripple) in the output signal. Amplifier 86, modulator 88, integrator 89 and feedback paths 216A, 216B may substantially eliminate dynamic limitations of chopper stabilization through a combination of chopping at low-impedance nodes and AC feedback, respectively.
In
Without the negative feedback provided by feedback path 216A, 216B, the output of amplifier 86, modulator 88 and integrator 89 could include spikes superimposed on the desired signal because of the limited bandwidth of the amplifier at low power. However, the negative feedback provided by feedback path 216A, 216B suppresses these spikes so that the output of instrumentation amplifier 210 in steady state is an amplified representation of the differential voltage produced across the inputs of amplifier 86 with very little noise.
Feedback paths 216A, 216B, as shown in
Switches 220A and 220B toggle between a reference voltage (Vref) and the output of the mixer amplifier 200 to place a charge on capacitors 218A and 218B, respectively. The reference voltage may be, for example, a mid-rail voltage between a maximum rail voltage of amplifier 86 and ground. For example, if the amplifier circuit is powered with a source of 0 to 2 volts, then the mid-rail Vref voltage may be on the order of 1 volt. Switches 220A and 220B should be 180 degrees out of phase with each other to ensure that a negative feedback path exists during each half of the clock cycle. One of switches 220A, 220B should also be synchronized with the mixer amplifier 200 so that the negative feedback suppresses the amplitude of the input signal to the mixer amplifier to keep the signal change small in steady state. Hence, a first one of the switches 220A, 220B may modulate at a frequency of fc±δ, while a second switch 220A, 220B modulates at a frequency of fc±δ, but 180 degrees out of phase with the first switch. By keeping the signal change small and switching at low impedance nodes of the mixer amplifier, e.g., as shown in the circuit diagram of
Switches 212 and 220, as well as the switches at low impedance nodes of the mixer amplifier, may be CMOS SPDT switches. CMOS switches provide fast switching dynamics that enables switching to be viewed as a continuous process. The transfer function of instrumentation amplifier 210 may be defined by the transfer function provided in equation (6) below, where Vout is the voltage of the output of mixer amplifier 200, Cin is the capacitance of input capacitors 83, ΔVin is the differential voltage at the inputs to amplifier 86, Cfb is the capacitance of feedback capacitors 218A, 218B, and Vref is the reference voltage that switches 220A, 220B mix with the output of mixer amplifier 200.
Vout=Cin(ΔVin)/Cfb+Vref (6)
From equation (6), it is clear that the gain of instrumentation amplifier 210 is set by the ratio of input capacitors Cin and feedback capacitors Cfb, i.e., capacitors 83 and capacitors 218. The ratio of Cin/Cfb may be selected to be on the order of 100. Capacitors 218 may be poly-poly, on-chip capacitors or other types of MOS capacitors and should be well matched, i.e., symmetrical.
Although not shown in
Blanking circuitry may be provided in some embodiments for applications in which measurements are taken in conjunction with stimulation pulses delivered by a cardiac pacemaker, cardiac defibrillator, or neurostimulator. Such blanking circuitry may be added between the inputs of amplifier 86 and coupling capacitors 83A, 83B to ensure that the input signal settles before reconnecting amplifier 86 to the input signal. For example, the blanking circuitry may be a blanking multiplexer (MUX) that selectively couples and de-couples amplifier 86 from the input signal. This blanking circuitry may selectively decouple the amplifier 86 from the differential input signal and selectively disable the first and second modulators, i.e., switches 212, 220, e.g., during delivery of a stimulation pulse.
A blanking MUX is optional but may be desirable. The clocks driving switches 212, 220 to function as modulators cannot be simply shut off because the residual offset voltage on the mixer amplifier would saturate the amplifier in a few milliseconds. For this reason, a blanking MUX may be provided to decouple amplifier 86 from the input signal for a specified period of time during and following application of a stimulation by a cardiac pacemaker or defibrillator, or by a neurostimulator.
To achieve suitable blanking, the input and feedback switches 212, 220 should be disabled while the mixer amplifier continues to demodulate the input signal. This holds the state of integrator 89 within the mixer amplifier because the modulated signal is not present at the inputs of the integrator, while the demodulator continues to chop the DC offsets. Accordingly, a blanking MUX may further include circuitry or be associated with circuitry configured to selectively disable switches 212, 220 during a blanking interval. Post blanking, the mixer amplifier may require additional time to resettle because some perturbations may remain. Thus, the total blanking time includes time for demodulating the input signal while the input switches 212, 220 are disabled and time for settling of any remaining perturbations. An example blanking time following application of a stimulation pulse may be approximately 8 ms with 5 ms for the mixer amplifier and 3 ms for the AC coupling components.
Examples of various additional chopper amplifier circuits that may be adapted for use with techniques, circuits and devices of this disclosure are described in U.S. Pat. No. 7,385,443, issued Jun. 10, 2008, to Timothy J. Denison, entitled “Chopper Stabilized Instrumentation Amplifier,” the entire content of which is incorporated herein by reference.
Current source 222 applies the current Istim to modulator 224, which modulates the current Istim at the carrier frequency fc The current Istim is then applied across the inputs to the I and Q signal paths of amplifier 72C. To support impedance measurement, the operation of the front-end modulators (not shown in
A chopper-stabilized superheterodyne amplifier circuit, as described in this disclosure, may be analyzed in terms of a performance figure of merit. For a chopper-stabilized amplifier with a powered bandpass filter, rather than a superheterodyne structure, if W=center frequency, BW=bandwidth, and A=gain, then a gain-bandwidth product of A*(W+BW/2) is needed to realize such a system. With a chopper-stabilized superheterodyne amplifier circuit, only A*(BW/2) is needed because the band of interest is selected. However, to compensate for the scaling of the signal by 4/π2, to maintain signal to noise ratio (SNR), it may be necessary to scale current by that square, and also add a factor of two for in-phase and quadrature channels. Consequently, a metric of [(π2/4)2]*A*BW/2 is needed. This metric indicates when the chopper-stabilized superheterodyne amplifier circuit provides desirable efficiency. In general, the chopper-stabilized superheterodyne amplifier circuit may be particularly useful when (W+BW/2)/BW˜Q>(π)4/16˜6. If the applicable Q is greater than 6, then the chopper-stabilized superheterodyne amplifier is both easy to implement and the most efficient approach. In some embodiments, a heterodyning chopper amplifier in accordance with this disclosure may operate at power levels on the order of 8 microwatts while permitting direction extraction of 2 microvolt-RMS brain biomarker signals.
In-phase lowpass filter 125 delivers the in-phase signal to digital signal processor 226 and quadrature lowpass filter 133 delivers the quadrature signal to digital signal processor 226. Digital signal processor 226 includes or is coupled to an analog-to-digital converter (ADC) to convert the in-phase signal and the quadrature signal to digital signals for processing. Digital signal processor 226 squares the digital in-phase signal and the digital quadrature signal. Digital signal processor 226 then sums the squared digital signals together and filters the summed digital signal to generate a low-noise, phase-insensitive digital output signal (Vout).
As described above, the signal may be input to signal analysis unit 73 from
Connections between the sensing device 302 and a controller of the stimulator 304 can be made through an interrupt vector and inter-integrated circuit (I2C) bus port. The partitioning of the signal chain between analog and digital blocks may focus on designing a robust analog front-end to extract the core information of interest and thereby maximize information content prior to digitization. This partitioning may allow the digitizer and signal processing algorithms to be run in the microprocessor block at low clock rates and with a reduced power requirement. In one embodiment, microprocessor block 306 may be configured to utilize less than one percent of the available processor resources and to keep system power below approximately 25 μW.
In some embodiments, sensing device 302 may provide added diagnostic and closed-loop titration capabilities to an existing neurostimulator or other therapy device. In such cases, sensing device 302 may send commands to neurostimulator 304 for titration of therapy parameter values associated with the therapy device based on an algorithm. Connections between the sensing extension and the electrodes may be made through a protection network that isolates the sensing device from stimulation and blocks DC currents.
In the example of
Sensing device 302 also may include external memory 336 and one or more passive arrays 328. The passive arrays 328 may form a passive protection network between the sense electrodes in lead connector block 330 and the analog sensing unit IC 308. Each chopper amplifier channel 322A-D may be configured to receive a signal from a respective electrode via connector block 330 and extract signal power in a defined frequency band. The analog sensing unit IC 308 may increase the information content and lower the bandwidth prior to digitization by A/D converter 316 within microprocessor block 306. By operating at low rates, the microprocessor block 306 may be able to digitize, track events, and write to memory while maintaining microwatt power operation.
As an illustration,
As further shown in the example of
Microprocessor block 306 may exchange information with analog sensing unit 308 via memory interface 332 and I/O port 320. Trim registers 334 may be provided for calibration or adjustment of various aspects of analog sensing unit 308. External memory 336 may store sensed data, and exchange data with memory interface 332 of analog sensing unit 308. A/D converter 316 of microprocessor block 306 receives the outputs of the chopper amplifier channels 322A-D and converts the analog output signals to digital values for processing and analysis by the microprocessor control unit 310. Chopper amplifiers 322A-D allow analog sensing unit 308 to extract energy from a specified band defined by the band-center, δ, with a bandwidth about δ defined by BW. The chopper amplifiers 322A-D may represent any of the chopper amplifiers discussed in this disclosure, including amplifiers 32, 32A, 72, 72A, 72B, 72C, 72D, and 210 shown in
Microprocessor block 306 may contain a digital control interface that enables microprocessor control of amplifier channels 322A-D through memory mapped registers. Parameters such as gain and trim states can be adjusted through the control interface. In addition, an interface may be provided to a 1 MB loop recording SRAM. The digital control interface may reduce the number of control lines needed by the microprocessor. In addition, the digital control interface may also provide a sample clock for A/D converter 316, which may allow control unit 310 to enter a low power sleep mode between samples and thereby cause the duty cycle to be reduced for digitization and algorithm processing. In some embodiments, the duty cycle may be reduced to as low as 1%.
The various chopper amplifier channels 322A-D may be provided to sense signals via different electrode pairs or to sense signals in different frequency bands. Control unit 326 of analog sensing unit 308 may adjust the clock offsets of the chopper amplifiers 322A-D to cause the chopper amplifiers to extract band power from different frequency bands on a selective basis. In some embodiments, microprocessor block 306, analog sensing unit 308 or both may be programmable so that the selected frequency bands monitored by the chopper amplifier channels 322A-D can be adjusted.
The spectral processors 322A-D and the electrode coupling circuit may be interfaced through an input switch matrix 324 that allows for flexible selection of the electrode vector for measurement after electrode placement. The configuration of each of the spectral processors and the switch montage may be held in an on-chip register bank and EEPROM memory, which is accessed through microprocessor block 306. The output of the analog spectral processors 322A-D may be fed into the analog to digital converter 316 of microprocessor block 306 for digitization. Power supplies may be provided from the existing neurostimulator 304.
Microprocessor control unit 310 may generate a blanking signal to decouple the sense electrodes from the chopper amplifier channels 322A-D via the electrode switch matrix 324 when a stimulation pulse or waveform is applied by the neurostimulator 304. Microprocessor control unit 310 may communicate with the neurostimulator 304 via an interrupt and the I2C bus to coordinate operation of the sensing device 302 and the neurostimulator 304. Although a neurostimulator 304 is shown in
A differential clock generator may generate the system clocks necessary to drive the heterodyning chopper amplifiers. The clock generator may comprise a clock tree such that the four channels share a common 4 kHz “Fclk” driver for the front-end modulators. The common clock may help prevent beating at the tissue interface. Each sensing channel may also have a dedicated local clock to create the Fclk+δ reference for the back-end of the amplifiers 322A-D. The clocks may be trimmed to 2 times their nominal value and then downsampled to provide the quadrature drivers necessary for the parallel branches of the spectral processor. The clock itself may be constructed from a relaxation oscillator. In one embodiment, a current budget of 200 nA/channel may be allocated for the clock in order to minimize the impact on system power.
In one example, the clock frequency may be adjustable with capacitive trims to achieve 4 Hz step sizes from DC to 500 Hz. The trims may be accessible through a register port, and the microprocessor block may routinely calibrate the clocks comparing periods with the crystal oscillator embedded with the existing neurostimulator to minimize drift.
As shown in
In some embodiments, analog to digital converter (ADC) 316 may sample and store raw EEG (time-domain) data at a higher rate (such as 200 Hz) along with the 5 Hz bandpower data. Such an embodiment may allow for additional post processing and analysis of the data and may be useful for algorithm validation or to identify new biomarkers.
When measuring neuronal activity, the band power fluctuations in the local field potentials (LFPs) are generally orders of magnitude slower than the frequency at which they are encoded, so the use of efficient analog preprocessing before performing analog to digital conversion can greatly reduce the overall energy requirements for implementing a complete mixed-signal system. A preprocessing device, that directly extracts energy in key neuronal bands and tracks the relatively slow power fluctuations, such as analog sensing unit 308 in
The various transistors in the example of
As shown in
The folded-cascode design allows currents to be partitioned in order to improve noise performance. In one example, 300 nA of current may be allocated to flow through each input pair, 50 nA of current may be allocated to flow through each leg of the folded cascade, 50 nA of current may be allocated for the output stage, and 50 nA of current may be allocated for bias generation and distribution. Such a partitioning directs the majority of current into the input pair to maximize transconductance compared to other field-effect transistors (FETs) in the amplifier, and biases the transistors at sub-threshold levels. In one embodiment, the biasing N-channel FETs (NFETs) may be scaled relatively large to suppress the noise contribution from the NFETs and thereby further suppress effective 1/f noise. In addition, an additional 500 kΩ of source degeneration may be used to lower the effective transconductance of the biasing NFETs relative to the input pair.
The low-pass filter 348 may be constructed as a passive circuit with high resistance CrSi materials and poly-poly capacitors. The low-pass filter 348 may mimic a quasi-Gaussian response. As shown in
The various transistors in the example of
Two phases are necessary to reconstruct a hypotenuse of the signal. For ease of illustration, however,
where φ is the phase of the input signal, t is time, Ib is the bias current of the circuit, Vin is the input signal applied to the power block, Vth is the thermal voltage (kT/q), which is 27 millivolts at body temperature, R is the value of the load resistor for the circuit, which sets the gain, and η is the sub-threshold slope factor, which is a function of the fabrication process and usually falls between approximately 1.5 and 1.7. The above equation represents the output voltage that is produced by combining two of the power extraction blocks shown in
As shown in
Equation (8) demonstrates that phase sensitivity of the signal chain is eliminated during the power estimation step. The transfer function achieves 1 V/V2 scaling assuming a differential pair bias of 60 nA and load resistor of 60MΩ, 10 mV at the input and a subthreshold factor of 1.5 for the process. To provide additional accuracy for biomarker detection, chopper stabilization of the multipliers may also be employed. The multipliers may have intrinsic offsets (Voff) on the order of mV, which are not trivial compared to the microvolt biomarkers. The net transfer function with these offsets taken into account may be represented by the following equation:
Vout(t)∝Vin2(t)+Voff2+2[VinVoff] (9)
where Voff is the offset due to mismatches among the transistors from finite tolerance. When these offsets are added to the input signal, they form a product that adds a relative amplitude scaling that is dependent on the offset of the multiplier and can be different between the channels. As a signal beats between the in-phase and quadrature channels, the scaling mismatch may create distortion. In order to suppress the effect of these offsets, the inputs may be modulated at 64 Hz with an input chopper. The net transfer function through the multiplier may thus be represented as:
Vout(t)∝Vin2(t)+Voff2+2[(Δ)VinVoff−(1−Δ)VinVoff] (10)
where Δ is the duty cycle of the chopper. If the duty cycle approaches 0.5 and the output of the power block lowpass filters the 64 Hz modulation product, then the cross-product is eliminated and the offset is limited to a static offset term that the algorithm can trim out during a calibration process.
An input chopper, such as front-end chopper 442, is an example of a circuit that may suppress intermodulation. The input of the front-end chopper 442 may be the output of a low pass filter that is coupled to the output of the mixer amplifier in the heterodyning chopper-stabilized amplifier. The low pass filter may produce differential Vin+ and Vin− signals. For example, a lowpass filter such as lowpass filters 58, 74, 100, 125 or 133 may produce Vin+ and Vin− signals that can be applied to the front-end chopper 442 to produce the V+ and V− signals that are applied to the differential input of the power block 440. The switches 444A, 444B in the front-end chopper may be switched at a desired chop frequency, such as 64 Hz. For example, to prevent residual offsets in tanh circuits from creating intermodulation products in the I and Q channels, the inputs to the Gilbert multipliers can be chopped with a square wave, e.g., at 64 Hz, via the front-end chopper 442. Providing chopping via the front-end chopper 442 eliminates or reduces the intermodulation products. Without the front-end chopper 442, significant ‘beating’ of the offsets could occur in the stage and the input signal, which could corrupt the signal significantly. Chopping via front-end 442 can reduce or eliminate this issue. A front-end chopper in the power block could also be desirable in applications in which a heterodyning chopper-stabilized amplifier is used for wireless telemetry applications, e.g., in an RF receiver. As one example, front-end chopper 442 may be used to implement modulators 510 and 520 of the superheterodyning, chopper-stabilized instrumentation amplifier shown in
The output of power block 440 may have an on-chip capacitor to limit the power bandwidth, when the pad and interconnect parasitics are added to power output node. In some embodiments, the power bandwidth is limited to 10 Hz. In additional embodiments, filtering may also be added to the power block by switching in an off-chip capacitor.
Passive arrays 380 may be configured to block DC current flowing through the electrode-sensing device interface in order to avoid corrosion and pH imbalance. The high common-mode input impedance of the chopper amplifier may minimize any common-mode rejection ratio (CMRR) reduction that can occur due to loading imbalances of the input matrix because the matching of the 100 nF passive array is limited to 80 dB. In addition, ESD cells and on-chip blocking clamps may maintain high impedance over a +/−10 V differential drive across an electrode pair. The combination of coupling capacitors and high input impedance reduces the parallel load of the sensing interface compared to tissue.
The blocking capacitors may provide low-frequency highpass filtering of the signal chain. The capacitors may be used in combination with a programmable resistor on the sensing device to set the high-pass corner for the signal chain. The high-pass corner can be selected at various frequencies through appropriate register selection. Example frequencies include 0.5, 2.5 and 8 Hz, in addition to a DC test mode. Such functionality may help reduce the area of sensing device 302.
Each of the heterodyning chopper amplifier channels may be configurable with its own dedicated differential clock to select a band of interest. To avoid beating of the clocks at the non-linear electrode-tissue interface, a common front-end clock may be shared for all of the channels. The differential clock may be embedded in the back-half of the signal chain on-chip, and isolated from the front-end. In some embodiments, the signal may be pre-filtered at the front-end prior to the silicon junctions. Lowpass filtering helps minimize rectification of high-bandwidth signals from sources like telemetry links. To implement this, a series on-chip resistor may be shunted by an off-chip capacitor, one per channel, in front of all low-voltage rectifying junctions such as the limiting-clamp or switch matrix. In one embodiment, the series on-chip resistor may be a 15kΩ resistor and the off-chip capacitor may be a 3.3 nF capacitor.
A frequency-selective signal monitor incorporating a heterodyning, chopper-stabilized amplifier circuit may be desirable in a variety of applications, including the monitoring of neuronal activity in the brain. For example, a micropower architecture for extraction and processing of neuronal biomarkers may be helpful in promoting the expansion of the diagnostic and therapeutic capabilities of implantable medical devices such as electrical stimulators. The design of a sensing circuit for monitoring of neuronal activity can be challenging. First, in many applications, the signal input should be robust for chronic recording. Second, the circuit architecture should be capable of achieving signal processing, algorithm control, and telemetry with a limited power budget.
For the first requirement, a robust signal input may be obtained by measuring field potentials, which generally represent ensemble behavior in a neural network and can be measured chronically. For the second requirement, architecting an effective solution may require identification of the key information of interest and partitioning the signal chain to play to the strengths of analog versus digital processing. In various embodiments, a frequency selective signal monitor incorporating a heterodyning, chopper-stabilized amplifier circuit, as described in this disclosure, may satisfy the above requirements for neuronal activity monitoring.
As described in this disclosure, for many neurological states of interest, information is encoded as low frequency power fluctuations within well-defined frequency bands of field potentials, similar to the coding found in an amplitude modulation (AM) radio. Recognizing this similarity, incoming field potential signals can be processed with low-power analog circuits to amplify and extract power fluctuations at physiologically-relevant frequencies prior to digital processing. In essence, a frequency-selective signal monitor circuit may adapt a chopper-stabilized instrumentation amplifier to act as a superheterodyning AM receiver for brain signals.
Because power fluctuations in neuronal signals are often orders of magnitude slower than the frequency at which they are encoded, analog preprocessing can greatly reduce the power requirements for implementing a complete mixed-signal system. As the science of neuronal field potentials is rapidly evolving, a superheterodyning chopper circuit as described in this disclosure may be advantageous since it can be made highly flexible while being robust to process, temperature, and mismatch variations. In some embodiments, a circuit as described in this disclosure may exhibit a noise floor of under 2 microvolts rms, and a total system current of 25 microwatts/channel (with a 1.8V power supply) including bandpower extraction, digitization, and algorithmic processing.
A heterodyning chopper amplifier channel generally corresponding to the amplifier circuits described in this disclosure was prototyped in an 0.8 micron CMOS process with high-resistance CrSi to verify the theory of operation. Table 1 below shows some of the heterodyning chopper amplifier results.
The total IC current draw of 7 μW from a 1.8V supply; 5 μW was allocated for the heterodyning chopper chain, and 2 μW for the support circuitry. The IC exhibited broad power tuning capabilities for biomarkers between 10 Hz to 500 Hz (with trim steps of 5 Hz). This range of programmability covers both known biomarkers detectable in surface EEG, as well as significantly higher frequency biomarkers. Trim states may be written from a microprocessor via an I2C port, and can be either adjusted as part of an algorithm (e.g. a swept-sine spectrogram) or a state can be locked in with a non-volatile memory array on-chip.
The noise floor of the signal chain was measured to be approximately (2 μVolts rms)2 with channel conditions programmed to BW=10 Hz, and BWpower=1 Hz, in excellent agreement to theoretical expectations and suitable for detecting relevant biomarkers for a neuroprosthesis. The power supply rejection ratio (PSRR) was measured to be greater than 80 dB for frequencies that fold into the power output. Since the maximum supply perturbation is bounded to 10 mV during stimulation, supply noise is negligible in practice.
The differential clock performance may be important to proper operation of the signal chain. The maximum differential clock jitter was bounded (4σ) to +/−1 Hz using 150 nA total bias current, and the mean clock drift was approximately 0.1 Hz/C. The tight differential clock tolerance ensures robust programmability using on-chip oscillators.
In some embodiments, a frequency selection monitor based on a heterodyning chopper amplifier circuit may be implemented in a swept spectrum analyzer. In a swept spectrum analyzer, a microprocessor or other controller may be configured to shift the heterodyning frequency in discrete 5 Hz steps, and the power is then digitized and stored in the memory module. A swept spectrum mode may be useful for identifying bands of field potential energy, with a power efficient search algorithm. The swept spectrum feature may be utilized full time or as a selectable mode for operation when desired. This example emphasizes the power of analog preprocessing coupled with a flexible microprocessor.
Microprocessor block 306 may downsample the digitized bandpower signal to a lower sampling rate (408). Microprocessor block 306 may generate a background signal for the digitized bandpower signal by applying to the digitized bandpower signal a three-stage median filter over a background time window (e.g., 30 minutes) followed by a lowpass smoothing filter (410). In some embodiments, the background time window may be longer than the foreground time window. Microprocessor block 306 may normalize the bandpower signals by comparing the short foreground time window (e.g., 2 seconds) to the longer background time window (e.g., 30 minutes) (412). This normalized signal is then fed into detection/tracking logic within microprocessor block 306, which enables the system to monitor changes in the power for the selected frequency band. The detection/tracking logic may produce detection output and tracking output that can then be used to trigger loop recording and/or to titrate stimulation therapy.
Microprocessor block 306 may control settings on the analog sensing unit 308 through one or more control registers. This enables configuration of the gain and switch matrix as well as parameters like bias trims. Since microprocessor block 306 is also running the algorithms, it is possible to perform feedback control back to the analog sensing unit 308. For example, the background signal in process 400 of
A neurostimulation therapy and sensing system may inject and measure signals that have magnitudes that are several orders of magnitude apart. For example, the signals being sensed by the system (i.e. the physiological signals) may be on the order of microvolts, while the signals injected by the system (i.e. the stimulation signals) may be on the order of volts resulting in the extraction of a biomarker that is six orders of magnitude lower than the stimulation signal. In addition, some neurostimulation therapies involve delivering stimulation continuously, or at least a significant portion of the time, so shutting down sensing, or ‘blanking’, during this time may not be a desirable option.
One way to manage the large differential in the magnitude of the injection and measurement signals is to have separate leads for stimulation and for sensing. In addition to the physical separation of the leads, careful placement of the leads and sense/stim configuration can take advantage of the reciprocity theorem of electromagnetism. Stated mathematically:
The dot product relationship in Equation (11) indicates minimum effect when the measurement vector is orthogonal to the stimulation current flow. Thus, the differential amplitude of the stimulation as seen by the sense electrodes can be greatly reduced by careful lead placement.
Additional embodiments described in this disclosure may provide a system based upon a neural sensing and algorithm extension applied to a neurostimulator. The design of the sensing device may support efficiently extracting neuronal biomarkers using analog preprocessing prior to digitization and analysis by various algorithms. The architecture provides broad ‘tunability’ and robustness. Such a fully implantable system may be used to answer questions with the goal of improving neurostimulation therapies, such as DBS.
Moreover, such a system that includes both sensing and stimulation capabilities may provide one or more advantages. For example, such systems may help identify chronic biomarkers within the brain without the spatiotemporal filtering limitations commonly associated with surface EEG recording. As another example, such systems may be able to determine what algorithms provide closed-loop control that is both safe and effective. As yet another example, such algorithms may evaluate whether improvements in therapy outcomes outweigh the complexities of closed-loop control.
A sensing device designed in accordance with this disclosure may provide a mixed-signal sense and control architecture enabling a closed-loop neuromodulation device. Such a device may be used as a research tool for exploring real-time titration of neuromodulation based on bioelectrical markers in the brain. In some embodiments, the device architecture may be partitioned with respect to the neural coding of the biomarkers. Such partitioning may allow the device to accurately and chronically monitor neuronal activity, process algorithms, and titrate stimulation with an architecture that is robust, ultra-low power, and flexible. Many biomarkers of interest are encoded as low frequency power fluctuations of discrete frequency bands. A sensing system utilizing a custom integrated circuit (IC) that configures a micro-power chopper-stabilized amplifier to also act as a super-heterodyne filter may allow for accurate tracking of power fluctuations. Heterodyning provides the flexibility to accurately select biomarker parameters over a broad physiological spectrum. In addition, extracting core neural information in the analog domain reduces the power requirements for the digital processing of the control algorithm. The IC may use 5 μW of power and achieve a detection floor of 1 μVrms biomarkers, and may use less than 25 μW/channel to perform biomarker extraction, algorithmic processing, and control of the neurostimulator.
A mixed signal sensing device generally corresponding to the sensing device described in this disclosure was prototyped in a 0.8 um CMOS process with high-resistance CrSi to verify the theory of operation of the heterodyning chopper amplifier. The total current draw of the prototype was 2.5 μA per channel from a 1.8V supply, where 2.2 μA was allocated for the heterodyning chopper chain, and 0.3 μA for the shared support circuitry. Table 2 below shows the results.
The signal chain's noise floor was measured to be approximately (1 μVrms)2 with channel conditions programmed to BW=10 Hz, and BWpower=1 Hz, in agreement with theoretical expectations and suitable for detecting relevant biomarkers for a neuroprosthesis.
The maximum differential clock jitter was measured and bounded (4σ) to +/−1 Hz using 200 nA channel bias current, and the clock drift (4σ) was 0.5 Hz/C, with a mean of 0.1 Hz/C. Based on practical algorithm studies using data from twenty patients, the measured clock tolerance provides acceptable tuning within the normal physiological temperature range (37C+/−2C) and ensures band tuning is maintained with adequate precision.
The following section covers the results for a prototype system having a sensing device working within a full prototype closed-loop neurostimulator. The system may generally correspond to sensing system 300 depicted in
The algorithm used in the prototype generally corresponds to the algorithm illustrated in
In the prototype, the microprocessor controlled the settings on the sensing chip and loop recorder through control registers. This enabled configuration of the gain and switch matrix as well as parameters like bias trims. Since the processor is also running the algorithms, it was possible to perform feedback control back to the analog sensing unit. For example, upper and lower thresholds could be put on the background power measurement in the algorithm shown in
The signal processing was partitioned such that the sensing device signals were processed using a microprocessor, so that algorithms could be customized by making firmware changes downloadable through telemetry. The biomarkers of interest had already had their power-in-a-band measurement extracted by the sensing device. Since this signal may change very slowly compared to the frequencies that encode the biomarkers, sampling and processing were done at rate of 5 Hz or lower. Using this method of analog preprocessing and running algorithms at slow rates, we could limit the total power of the sensing extension to an order of a magnitude lower than that of the stimulation therapy.
Analog headroom may be managed by minimizing the coupling between stimulation and sensing vectors, as shown in
Several chopper modulation techniques may be used to achieve microvolt signal resolution with the spectral analysis strategy described in this disclosure. The total signal chain with modulation is detailed in
The first issue is that the residual offsets in the core chopper can be on the order of several microvolts. The problem with this residual offset is that it is superimposed on the signal of interest, which may cause significant signal perturbations in the output signal as the phase of the biomarker beats against the δ clock. To address this issue, a ‘nested’ chopper switch set may be implemented before the first chopper amplifier, and after the programmable gain amplifier (PGA), with the fclk/m clock, as shown in
The small residual offsets are then up-modulated and filtered out using the BW/2 selection filter. As an illustration, the nested chopper may run nominally at Fclk/64, 128 Hz, to minimize residual charge injection offset, but fast enough to minimize perturbations to low-frequency dynamics. Note that since the PGA is also embedded in the loop, its residual 1/f noise and offset is also suppressed at the lower rate. The use of the passive lowpass filter architecture in the BW/2-selection block may minimize additional contributions of offset to the signal chain after the nested chopper.
The second issue is that residual offsets in the output multiplier blocks create an intermodulation product that also creates significant distortion when trying to resolve microvolt signals. The use of an additional, low-frequency chopper prior to multiplication may be used to correct that issue. For example, a chopper at a frequency of fclk/2 m may be used to address the intermodulation product. This chopper frequency may be less than the fclk/m and fclk frequencies of the outer and inner choppers, respectively. Notably, with the additional chopper, because the multiplier squares the signal, a subsequent explicit down-modulation block may not be required. A low pass filter may be provided to set the power bandwidth to produce the EEG bandpower output.
Hence, in accordance with this disclosure, a physiological signal monitoring device may have a nested chopper architecture. The nested chopper architecture may include an outer chopper circuit comprising a modulator and a demodulator. Between the modulator and demodulator of the outer chopper circuit, the nested chopper architecture may include an inner chopper circuit comprising a modulator, amplifier, and a demodulator. The outer chopper circuit may modulate and demodulate at a first frequency and the inner chopper circuit may modulate at a second frequency and demodulate at a third frequency. The first frequency may be less than the second frequency. The third frequency may differ from the second frequency by an offset. The offset may correspond to a frequency within a selected frequency band. In this way, the baseband for the heterodyning inner chopper is effectively shifted to an intermediate frequency.
Such a device may comprise, in an example embodiment, a physiological sensing element that receives a physiological signal, and a first modulator that modulates the signal at a first frequency to produce a first modulated signal, and a second modulator that modulates the first modulated signal at a second frequency different from the first frequency to produce a second modulated signal, an amplifier that amplifies the second modulated signal, and a first demodulator that demodulates the amplified signal at a third frequency different from the second frequency. The third frequency may be selected such that the demodulator substantially centers the selected frequency band of the signal at the first frequency. The device may also comprise a second demodulator that demodulates the demodulated signal at the first frequency such that the selected frequency band is substantially centered at the baseband. The second modulator and the first demodulator may form an inner chopper circuit surrounding the amplifier. In addition, the first modulator and second demodulator may form an outer chopper circuit thereby providing a nested chopper architecture. In some embodiments, a second amplifier may be placed between the first and second demodulators such that the second amplifier is placed inside of the outer chopper circuit but outside of the inner chopper circuit.
Superheterodyne instrumentation amplifier 500 contains several components that correspond in structure and operation to various components shown in the instrumentation amplifier of
Superheterodyne instrumentation amplifier 500 also includes outer chopper modulators 502 and 508 in the in-phase channel and outer chopper modulators 512 and 518 in the quadrature channel. Outer chopper modulators 502 and 512 may modulate the physiological input signal (Vin) at an intermediate frequency (e.g., fc/m). Then, inner chopping modulators 120 and 128 may modulate the respective signals at a chopping frequency. The net modulation frequency may then be described as the chopping frequency plus or minus the intermediate frequency (e.g., fc±fc/m). The twice up-modulated signals are then fed through amplifiers 122, 130, which may add noise 121, 129 to the signals. Inner chopping demodulators 124 and 132 demodulate the amplified signals at a frequency equal to the chopping frequency plus or minus an offset (fc±δ) and upmodulate the baseband noise components to higher frequencies. The frequency driving the demodulators may be selected such that the demodulator substantially centers a selected frequency band of the signal at the intermediate frequency.
The signals are then fed through programmable gain amplifiers (PGAs) 506, 516, which provide the ability to set the gain and/or dynamic range of the frequency channels. These settings may be programmable and based upon the physical condition or therapy being measured. The PGAs may also add additional noise 504, 514 to the signals. After a second amplification of the signals, outer chopping demodulators 508, 518 may demodulate the signals back to baseband. A selected frequency, which was centered at the intermediate frequency, may now be centered at DC in the baseband. Low pass filters 125, 133 filter out noise components that have been upmodulated as well as higher-order signal harmonics. Additional modulators 510, 520 modulate the baseband signal to a second intermediate frequency (e.g., fc/2 m) in order to reduce intermodulation noise. The signals are then fed through squaring units 126, 128 and added together with adder 136 to form a band power measurement. Low pass filter 137 filters the signal to extract the low-frequency fluctuations in the band power.
In some embodiments, the front-end modulators may be implemented as a single modulator. For example, modulators 502 and 120 may be implemented as a single modulator and modulators 512 and 128 may be implemented a single modulator with a composite frequency chosen to be (fc±fc/m).
A sensing device that contains a heterodyning chopper amplifiers designed in accordance with this disclosure may provide an independent adjustment of δ and Q over a wide spectrum of biomarkers with parameters well within process tolerances. These parameters may be able to be adjusted over a broad range through microprocessor control. After the bandwidth of the signal is reduced to the order of 1 Hz, the microprocessor may provide digitization and algorithmic processing functionality. With low data-rates, microprocessor overhead may be minimal and algorithm blocks, such as the median filtering and loop recording blocks, can be run with less power.
The use of feedback within the heterodyning chopper and programmable gain amplifier makes it very linear prior to the power extraction stage. This means that attenuation may not be required. In addition, a sensing system designed in accordance with this disclosure may improve overall system power efficiency by two orders of magnitude through elimination of fast digital processing.
Gain amplifier 416 may further amplify the physiological signal to minimize the dynamic range requirements of analog-to-digital converter 316 in microprocessor block 306. Since the gain required from this block is dependent on the specific patient, electrode location and intended control algorithm, the amplifier may be configured from a signal fed back by the algorithm running in microprocessor block 306. In an example embodiment, gain amplifier 416 may have a programmable gain that takes on different values (e.g., ×5, ×10, ×20, ×40) with a high degree of stability (e.g., +/−5%). Gain amplifier 416 may provide high linearity and a high input impedance to avoid loading the chopper amplifier. The transistors in gain amplifier 416 may be field effect transistors (FETs), and more particularly complementary metal-oxide semiconductor (CMOS) transistors.
The current through the front-end FETs in amplifier 416 may be held constant by a minor servo loop. The servo loop forces the differential voltage at the inputs to fall predominantly across source resistor 418, minimizing distortion from a variable gate-source voltage. Source resistor 418 may be programmable at several different levels of resistance. For example, source resistor 418 may be programmable from one to eight megaohms using switches shunting one or more CrSi resistors. By mirroring the top-side servo currents to output resistor tap 420, a gain can be set using the ratios of the resistors that is stable across process corners and temperature. In addition, by supplying a reference to the mid-point of the resistor string 420, we can also set an arbitrary bias point on the amplifier's output depending on the requirements of the next stage.
The various transistors in the example gain amplifier of
In some embodiments, a frequency selection monitor based on a heterodyning chopper amplifier circuit may be implemented within an implantable system that provides deep brain stimulation (DBS). Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) may refer to the extracellular electrical stimulation of brain tissue via the delivery of relatively high frequency current pulses, and can be an effective therapy for a number of pathologies of the human nervous system. A DBS system may include an implantable pulse generator (IPG) that is placed into the pectoral region of the chest of a patient. The IPG may contain the energy for stimulation within its battery, as well as the circuitry to provide stimulation pulses. The IPG may interface to neural tissue through a series of electrodes placed in a specific physiological target in the brain. Stimulation pulses from the IPG may be localized to the vicinity of the electrodes thereby providing targeted modulation of the firing pattern in a specific neural circuit. DBS may be used for the treatment of movement disorders such as Parkinson's Disease, essential tremor, dystonia. In addition DBS may used as therapy for epileptic seizure, bipolar disorders, chronic obesity, and obsessive-compulsive disorders. Similar modulation circuits may also used for the treatment of incontinence, by stimulating the sacral nerve, and chronic pain, through stimulation of the spinal chord.
Traditional DBS systems are commonly referred to as “open-loop” systems, meaning that the device has no sensing capability and adjustments require clinician intervention. A frequency selective monitor in accordance with this disclosure may assist in measuring neurological activity to help provide “closed-loop” therapy based on relevant neurophysiological biomarkers. In addition, a DBS system that incorporates a frequency selection monitor as described in this disclosure may assist in the practical measurement of chronic neurological information and in the implementation of algorithms for closed-loop titration of therapy.
Some systems for monitoring neuronal activity may include EEG monitoring using scalp electrodes and single neuron spike detection. However, there may be limitations to both these methods. For example, scalp electrodes may be prone to movement artifacts, which can greatly increase the difficulty of algorithm development. In addition, scalp electrodes may not be able to capture frequencies greater than approximately 50 Hz, which prevents exploration of promising biomarkers that have higher frequency content. For example, high gamma band power fluctuations in the motor cortex may signal motion intent of a patient. These signals may be commonly filtered out in EEG recordings derived from scalp electrodes. Also, the use of scalp electrodes may not be well suited for chronic studies. Neuron spike detection may also be susceptible to chronic recording issues like tissue encapsulation and micromotion.
Thus, it may be desirable to sense neuronal activity by recording and analyzing local field potentials (LFPs) using frequency-selective monitoring in accordance with techniques described in this disclosure. Because LFPs represent the ensemble activity of thousands to millions of cells in an in vivo neural population, their recording may avoid chronic recording issues. LFPs may be obtained with leads having sensing electrodes located on or in the brain. This may be well-suited for devices providing DBS, which already requires access to the brain. Low-frequency power fluctuations of discrete frequency bands in LFPs provide useful biomarkers for discriminating between brain states. Relevant biomarkers span a broad frequency spectrum, from approximately 1 Hz oscillations in deep sleep to greater than 500 Hz “fast ripples” in the hippocampus, and have widely varying bandwidths. In many cases, pathological states can be differentiated by such biomarkers. A system designed in accordance with this disclosure may be designed to sense such biomarkers. This may allow researchers to develop and test novel algorithms, including closed-loop therapy with the goal of improving therapy outcomes.
The primary role of the brain can broadly be considered in terms of its functional capacity as an information processor. Information about the current state of the ‘system’, as well as the world in which it is acting, is provided to the central nervous system through various afferent sensory signals, where it is then transformed, or ‘processed’, in some way. The transformed information effects action through efferent pathways connected to musculature, hormone regulating organs and other bio-physical and bio-chemical mechanisms. The input/output transformation can be viewed as an information transformation with the mutual information providing a measure of the capacity of that system.
Pathological dysfunction of brain systems can take a number of forms, and in accordance with the information processing framework, can be viewed as an information processing failure. Information might be corrupted due to noise or the intermittent loss of signal, or it can be lost entirely due to a transmission failure or lesion of central elements as occurs with infarction due to stroke. The information transfer functions can be corrupted due to many factors including the loss of individual neurons throughout the brain or the failure of various biochemical reactions affecting cellular processes.
A particular form of information processing failure is increasingly being investigated as a causal agent in numerous brain pathologies including epilepsy, Parkinson's disease, bipolar disorders and obsessive compulsive disorders to name a few. This failure occurs when the normally uncorrelated firing of individual neurons throughout a region of brain tissue devolves into a coherently organized synchronous oscillation. In this state, the normal, transiently correlated behavior of individual elements throughout the network is forced into a phase-locked firing pattern that significantly reduces the mutual information between afferent/efferent signals and completely disrupts the information processing capacity of the system as a whole.
An interesting property of this disease model is that correlated firing makes it feasible to design sensing systems to detect and monitor the presence of an information processing pathology. A ‘biomarker,’ or clinical signature, of this type of pathology is represented as electrical oscillation that appears within a discrete frequency band in a specific anatomical location. Using spectral analysis, the coding of the network close to the sensing electrodes can be deciphered and deductions can be made with respect to the state of the neural circuit. Unlike the spike recordings often discussed for motor prosthesis systems, these ensemble cell firings result in diffuse field potentials that are amenable to chronic measurement from electrodes already approved for DBS therapy. As such, it may be desirable to map the field fluctuations to a specific disease state, and to devise a stimulation strategy that can provide therapeutic benefits when the pathological state is detected.
As an example, epilepsy is characterized by the abnormal emergence of highly coherent, periodic synchronous firing of large populations of neurons. If the phase of individual neurons firing in a population is taken into account, the total phase coherence across the population can be loosely considered as a probability measure over phase. In the case of oscillatory dysfunctions, as phase coherence increases the entropy measure over the phase distribution decreases, negatively impacting the information capacity of the system as a whole. In a seizure, this phase-locked behavior becomes extreme, yielding a nearly total information processing failure and a strong increase of energy diffused across the alpha (8-12 Hz) and beta (12-40 Hz) spectral bands
Another example is Parkinson's disease. The functional mechanisms of Parkinson disease are presently unknown; however, recent research has demonstrated a strong correlation between patient symptoms and highly coherent Beta band (15-30 hz) oscillations in spike firing intervals within certain motor-control populations of neurons. The result of this synchronized firing could be a reduction in the uncorrelated (high information capacity) state space or, alternatively, increased power in a correlated noise source. In either case, the information processing capacity of the system may be degraded.
A difficulty in deciphering neural dynamics is the barrier to extracting information from the brain circuit. Scientific tools that monitor neural dynamics are needed to uncover the basic principles of function, the therapeutic affects of stimulation, and to provide the observability needed for adaptive neuromodulation. Systems for accomplishing these tasks are becoming more practical, as we learn enough about brain coding to architect devices for practical sensing and stimulation. These devices, per the next section, improve the link between silicon- and carbon-based electrical systems.
Adding sensing technology to a stimulator could provide several benefits. The scientific benefit is driven by the need for better understanding of basic network dynamics, information flow, and mechanisms of action for DBS therapies. From a clinical standpoint, there is interest in using sensing of neurological activity to help provide “closed-loop” therapy based on therapeutically relevant biomarkers. The goals of closed-loop therapy, also known as adaptive modulation, are to improve therapeutic outcomes and potentially increase device longevity by entering low-energy states when stimulation is not required. The addition of sensing can also provide quantitative diagnostics to aid in therapy titration in “open loop” use.
A saline tank model was developed for evaluating the closed-loop neurostimulator prototype. The concept is to adjust the information flow in a neural circuit, essentially dynamic entropy control, based on a measured biomarker. For the adaptive controller, we programmed the algorithm to initiate stimulation upon detection of a burst of LFP energy in the ‘β band’ (15-40 Hz). The β band is often an indicator of a pathological information pattern flowing through the neural circuit. A recorded signal from a human subject was fed into a saline tank. This signal was then extracted by the input electrodes placed across the appropriate sensing vector representing a cortical input, while the stimulation electrodes were placed within 1 cm of the sensing electrode using a return provided with an indifferent far-field electrode. The saline conductivity and signal drive strength was adjusted to mimic the electrical properties and signal levels of brain tissue, respectively.
After amplification and bandpower extraction with the sensing IC, the microprocessor sampled the signal at 5 Hz and ran an algorithm comparing the mean energy in the last two seconds to the median energy of the last thirty minutes. When the ratio exceeded a preset threshold and time duration, indicative of a true pathological event, a detection flag was passed to the neurostimulator stimulation controller over the 12C bus. This initiated stimulation at 140 Hz. Stimulation proceeded over the duration of the elevated β-band energy. The frequency separation between stimulation and LFP band energy allowed the system to maintain sensitivity to the biomarker, even in the presence of stimulation from an electrode 1 cm away.
This model illustrates that the research tool can address the major challenges of implementing an adaptive neuromodulation system. The system may be designed around the electrical biomarker of LFP band fluctuations. In some embodiments, the processing partition can extract the signal with a total current draw of under 15 uA/channel (sense, control), which is practical for implementing within a battery-powered implantable neuromodulation system.
Neuromodulation may be defined as the actuation of the nervous system with electrical stimulation. A neuromodulator may translate energy from a battery into information embedded within the nervous system. This information may provide therapeutic benefit to patients by modulating the pathological oscillations within a diseased neural circuit. One specific method of neuromodulation is deep brain stimulation (DBS). DBS is an approved therapy for the treatment of movement disorders such as Parkinson's, essential tremor and dystonia. DBS systems commonly operate in an “open-loop” mode, meaning the device has no inherent sensing capability and adjustments require external intervention through a telemetry system. A DBS system that provides closed-loop therapy may improve therapeutic outcomes with active titration of stimulation, and increase device longevity by entering low energy stimulation states when therapy is not required. Thus, it may be desirable to integrate a system for measuring neurological activity within a DBS system in order to provide “closed-loop” therapy based on therapeutically relevant biomarkers such as bioelectrical or activity sensing. A closed-loop system may provide chronic measurement of neurological information and may assist in the creation algorithms for closed-loop titration of therapy actuation.
A closed loop neuromodulation architecture may be modeled within the context of classical state equations:
{dot over (x)}(t)=A(t)x(t)+B(t)u(t)
y(t)=C(t)x(t)+D(t)u(t) (12)
where vector x(t) is the neural circuit's ‘state,’ u(t) is the input to the neural circuit, which can include sensory input, drugs or electrical stimulation, and y(t) is the output of interest such as tremor or another representative biomarker. The neural circuit dynamics and therapeutic transfer functions are then represented by the four transfer function matrices: A(t), representing neural circuit dynamics, B(t), defining the effect of stimulation on the neural state, C(t), representing how the neural state is mapped to observable therapeutic biomarkers, and D(t), representing the feed-forward path from stimulation to biomarker. Stimulation may also almost impact A(t) as well. The therapeutically-relevant variable y(t), denoted as the biomarker, may be controlled through modulation of the stimulation parameter u(t). This may be done by creating a net feedback path to the stimulation of the network. The relevant state equations including the net feedback path are shown below:
{dot over (x)}(t)=A(t)x(t)+B(t)K(y,t)y(t)+Bs(t)us(t)
y(t)=C(t)x(t)+D(t)K(y,t)y(t) (13)
where K(y,t) is the control matrix. Note that a separate us(t) has been partitioned to represent sources like sensory input which are not part of the feedback controller.
In some embodiments, the biomarker y(t) may be closely correlated to the therapeutic outcome of interest. In further embodiments, a control algorithm may be created to implement K(y,t), which is flexible, time dependent and potentially non-linear. Additional embodiments may minimize the feedforward corruption of the biomarker through stimulation coupling represented by D(t).
A typical DBS stimulation system may require roughly 250 μW of power to be delivered to the tissue to provide therapeutic benefit. Thus, the power of the feedback controller, in some embodiments of this disclosure, may be limited to approximately 25 μW to avoid undermining device longevity.
Chronic closed-loop neuromodulation may be achieved by using local field potentials (LFPs). Because LFPs represent the ensemble activity of thousands to millions of cells in an in vivo neural population, their recording can often avoid chronic recording issues like tissue encapsulation and micromotion encountered in single-unit recording. In addition, the large geometry of stimulation electrodes, on the order of a few mm2, takes a spatial average of neuronal activity that is by default representative of the LFP activity. In addition the modeling of the disease states as synchronously coherent oscillations may result in biomarkers which are often encoded robustly as field potential spectral fluctuations.
Low frequency power fluctuations of LFPs within discrete frequency bands can provide useful biomarkers for discriminating brain states. In many cases, pathological states can be differentiated by such biomarkers. LFP biomarkers are ubiquitous and span a broad frequency spectrum, from approximately 1 Hz oscillations in deep sleep to greater than 500 Hz “fast ripples” in the hippocampus, and show wide bandwidth variations. The high gamma band power fluctuations within the premotor cortex, which signal motion intent, constitutes an example of field potential coding. The ability of a patient to modulate this band may be used as a control input for a prosthetic actuator for spinal chord injuries. In addition, high gamma band power fluctuations may be useful for modulating stimulation parameters of movement disorders patients. Other examples of high-frequency activity include fast ripples at approximately 200 Hz to 500 Hz, and gamma frequency processing that is indicative of processing of smells in the olfactory bulb. The bandpower coding of LFPs can be used as a sensing paradigm to detect the activity of targeted neural circuits. In addition, LFPs may offer certain practical advantages over spike-based systems, such as providing contextual information and better chronic recording capability.
Sensing systems designed in accordance with this disclosure may provide for the neural coding of field potentials. Such a system may partition the signal chain to play to the relative strengths of analog and digital processing in order to minimize power while maintaining acceptable flexibility and robustness. Referring to the feedback state equations shown above in Equation (13), the signal chain may be partitioned to extract the low-frequency bandpower in a physiological band as the therapeutic signal y(t) using analog preprocessing, such as the preprocessing provided by analog sensing unit 308 in sensing system 300 of
The partitioning of the signal chain between analog and digital blocks is a balance between power and algorithmic flexibility. The analog block may include a flexible analog processor to extract the core biomarker information, LFP bandpower fluctuations, and thereby maximize information content prior to digitization. The digital block may include flexible algorithms that are implemented in a microprocessor. In some cases, the algorithms may be implemented with low overhead and can achieve a duty cycle of approximately 1%.
Micropower spectral analysis techniques may be useful for many applications including prosthetic applications beyond neuromodulation. In particular, such techniques may be useful with respect to cochlea implants in order to extract the Fourier transforms from a signal and map the extracted information to titrating stimulation in the cochlea An advantage of the heterodyning chopper is that gain-bandwidth requirement of the signal chain may be set by the passband width as opposed to the center frequency.
Various techniques described in this disclosure may be implemented in hardware, software, firmware or any combination thereof. For example, various aspects of the techniques may be implemented within or in conjunction with one or more microprocessors, digital signal processors (DSPs), application specific integrated circuits (ASICs), field programmable logic arrays (FPGAs), or any other equivalent integrated or discrete logic circuitry, as well as any combinations of such components. The term “processor” or “processing circuitry” may generally refer to any of the foregoing logic circuitry, alone or in combination with other logic circuitry, or any other equivalent circuitry.
When implemented in software, the functionality ascribed to the systems and devices described in this disclosure may be embodied as instructions on a computer-readable medium such as random access memory (RAM), read-only memory (ROM), non-volatile random access memory (NVRAM), electrically erasable programmable read-only memory (EEPROM), FLASH memory, magnetic media, optical media, or the like. The instructions may be executed to cause a processor to perform or support one or more aspects of the functionality described in this disclosure.
Although the invention is described in the context of EEG signals, various embodiments of the invention may be applied to monitor a variety of a variety of physiological signals, such as EEG, ECoG, ECG, EMG, pressure, temperature, impedance, motion, and other types of signals. Additional embodiments of this invention may be applied to monitor average spike firings of single brain cells by measuring single cell action potentials and binning the number of spikes over a period of time. Measuring an EMG signal according to the techniques described herein may assist in determining how hard a muscle is firing. In addition, frequency selective monitoring as described in this disclosure may also be used to support any of a variety of therapeutic and/or diagnostic applications. Accordingly, the specification should be considered exemplary and non-limiting of the invention as broadly embodied and described in this disclosure.
Various embodiments of the invention have been described. These and other embodiments are within the scope of the following claims.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/975,372, filed Sep. 26, 2007, entitled “FREQUENCY SELECTIVE MONITORING OF PHYSIOLOGICAL SIGNALS,” to Timothy J. Denison et al., U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/025,503, filed Feb. 1, 2008, entitled “FREQUENCY SELECTIVE MONITORING OF PHYSIOLOGICAL SIGNALS,” to Timothy J. Denison et al.; and U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/083,381, filed Jul. 24, 2008, entitled “FREQUENCY SELECTIVE MONITORING OF PHYSIOLOGICAL SIGNALS,” to Timothy J. Denison et al., the entire content of each of which is incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60975372 | Sep 2007 | US | |
61025503 | Feb 2008 | US | |
61083381 | Jul 2008 | US |