Frequency stabilized and crosstalk-free signal sources for optical communication systems

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6327064
  • Patent Number
    6,327,064
  • Date Filed
    Friday, March 27, 1998
    26 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, December 4, 2001
    23 years ago
Abstract
A simple and cost effective optical device is provided which locks the wavelength output of a laser transmitter in an optical transmission system as well as substantially reducing and/or eliminating signal crosstalk. A light source is coupled along an optical path to a filtering element. The light source has output frequency shifts based on variation in input current. The filtering element is configured with a reflectivity characteristic which corresponds to a first portion of the optical signal associated with one or more frequencies such that the reflectivity characteristic is greater than the output frequency variations associated with the light source.
Description




FIELD OF INVENTION




The present invention generally relates to optical communication systems and more particularly to an apparatus for providing frequency stabilized and crosstalk-free optical transmitters.




BACKGROUND OF INVENTION




Wavelength division multiplexing (WDM) is a technique for increasing the capacity of existing fiber optic networks by transmitting a plurality of channels over a single waveguide medium. WDM systems typically include a plurality of transmitters for transmitting modulated information signals on a designated one of a plurality of optical channels or wavelengths. The channels are combined by a multiplexer at a first terminal and transmitted to a demultiplexer at a receiving terminal along a transmission fiber. One or more amplifiers may be positioned along the transmission fiber to optically amplify the transmitted signals. The demultiplexer separates the optical channels and supplies them to receiving circuitry which converts the optical signals into electrical signals for processing. Dense WDM (DWDM) systems are also employed with this same general construction, but have a greater number of optical channels, typically with smaller channel spacings.




The transmitters used in WDM systems typically include semiconductor lasers each transmitting on a designated one of a plurality of wavelengths. The selected wavelengths are usually within the 1.55 μm range which corresponds to an absorption minimum associated with silica-based fibers. The output signal of each laser is controlled by an associated drive current and thermoelectric cooler (TEC) such that the transmitter output is locked to a particular channel wavelength and modulated with communication information either directly or externally. However, these lasers have associated frequency instabilities induced, for example, by temperature and/or injection current variations which may cause crosstalk problems between channels.




As mentioned above, the lasing frequency of semiconductor lasers changes with injection currents. This is due to the band-filling effect, junction heating effect and refractive index variations associated with each laser. Where distributed feedback (DFB) lasers are used as the source in these types of WDM systems, the heating effect is most problematic because as the input current increases the frequency of the output is red-shifted. This is more clearly illustrated with reference to

FIG. 1

which is a plot of the frequency variation of an exemplary DFB laser as a function of bias current at a temperature of 25° C. When the current increases from a threshold value I


th


, for example 13.8 mA, to a desired operating current 1


0


, for example 45 mA, at an output power of 2.5 mW, the output frequency of the laser will decrease by approximately 58 GHz. Since the transmitted wavelengths in a WDM and dense WDM systems are relatively close to each other, e.g. channel spacings in the 50 GHz range, this frequency shift can be larger than the channel spacings, thereby causing crosstalk problems and corrupting the transmitted communication signals. It should be noted that the values provided above are exemplary and the frequency shifts are device dependent.




It is known that one way to solve this laser frequency stabilization problem is to employ a narrow band fiber grating which functions as a laser cavity mirror. However a drawback with this technique is that it requires a very low reflectivity (e.g. in the order of ≦10


−4


) on one facet of the laser diode. The quality of the antireflective coating is therefore extremely critical and long-term reliability has not yet been demonstrated with this technique.




Thus, there is a need to provide a simple and cost effective optical device which locks the wavelength output of a laser transmitter in an optical transmission system.




SUMMARY OF INVENTION




The present invention meets these needs and avoids the above-referenced drawbacks by providing an optical device to stabilize the output frequency of a laser transmitter and substantially reducing and/or eliminating signal crosstalk. The optical device in accordance with the present invention includes a light source for generating a light signal at a particular frequency. The light source is capable of outputting frequency shifts based on variations in input current. A filtering element is also included which is coupled to the light source along an optical path. The filtering element is configured to have transmissivity and reflectivity characteristics as a function of frequency. The reflectivity characteristic corresponds to a first portion of the light signal associated with one or more frequencies outside of the particular frequency, the reflectivity characteristic associated with the filtering element being greater than the output frequency shifts associated with the light source. a light source for generating an optical signal at a particular frequency and a filtering element which is coupled along an optical path to the light source.




The foregoing, and other features and advantages of the present invention, will be apparent from the following description, the accompanying drawings and the appended claims.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS





FIG. 1

is a plot of the frequency variation of a DFB laser as a function of the bias current.





FIG. 2

is a schematic illustration of a frequency stabilized laser source in accordance with the present invention.





FIG. 3

illustrates an exemplary spectrum of the output power vs. frequency of a transmitter in accordance with the present invention.





FIG. 4

illustrates the transmittance vs. frequency spectrum of an exemplary filtering element in accordance with the present invention.





FIG. 5

illustrates the output power vs. frequency of a device as a result of using a filtering element in accordance with the present invention.





FIG. 6

illustrates a laser frequency variation as a function of an exemplary laser TEC temperature.





FIG. 7

illustrates the first and second derivatives of an exemplary filtering element reflectivity spectrum in accordance with the present invention.











DETAILED DESCRIPTION




In accordance with the present invention, an optical apparatus is provided which can be implemented with existing laser diodes to achieve crosstalk-free and frequency stabilized operation. A single filtering element is used for blocking undesired frequency signals as well as providing for frequency locking of the laser transmitter.





FIG. 2

schematically illustrates an optical device


10


in accordance with the present invention wherein transmitter


20


is coupled to the input of external modulator


30


along path


25


. Device


10


can be the light source for a particular channel frequency within a WDM or DWDM communication system. Transmitter


20


generates an optical signal having a frequency ν


0


, for example, corresponding to a wavelength in the 1.5 μm range. Transmitter


20


may be a light source in an existing communication system or may be part of a new system installation. Transmitter


20


can be, for example, a DFB semiconductor diode laser, generally comprising one or more III-V semiconductor materials, commercially available. The laser outputs an optical carrier signal at a particular channel wavelength. A laser controller, used with the DFB laser, provides the required laser bias current as well as thermal control of the laser.




External modulator


30


is used to modulate the light having frequency v


0


generated by transmitter


20


with information signals. External modulator


30


can be, for example, a Mach-Zehnder modulator employing a waveguiding medium whose refractive index changes according to the applied electrical field, i.e., the refractive index of an electro-optic material such as LiNbO


3


can be changed by applying an external voltage. In a Mach-Zehnder external modulator, two optical interferometer paths are provided where an incoming optical carrier is split between the two paths. In the absence of an external voltage, the optical fields in the two paths constructively interfere. When an external voltage is applied, the refractive index of one of the paths induces a phase shift that produces destructive interference.




A filtering element


40


is coupled along path


25


and is configured to transmit the desired signal wavelength and reflect wavelengths outside the transmission band. Filtering element


40


can be, for example, an in-line fiber Bragg grating comprising a series of photoinduced refractive index perturbations in an optical fiber which reflects optical signals within a selected wavelength band and transmits wavelengths outside of the selected wavelength band. The signals having a frequency outside ν


0


are reflected back to tap


35


. Tap


35


can be, for example a


95


/


5


tap which supplies the undesired reflected signals from grating


40


to signal processing or control circuit


50


by way of line


55


. Tap


45


is coupled along path


25


to filtering element


40


and receives the desired signal within the ν


0


frequency band. Tap


45


can also be a


95


/


5


tap used to collect 5% of the desired signal and supply it to processing circuitry


50


by way of line


60


. Processing circuitry


50


is coupled to transmitter


20


via optical path


65


and utilizes the signals received via lines


55


and


60


to control the output of transmitter


20


. In particular, these signals are used to adjust a thermoelectric cooler (not shown) to lock the output frequency of transmitter


20


as well as for adjusting the bias current supplied to transmitter


20


for constant output current.




Alternatively, external modulator


30


may be positioned after filtering element


40


along path


25


in which case a polarization mode fiber with a Bragg grating may be needed to match the polarization of the signal generated by transmitter


20


to that of external modulator


30


.





FIG. 3

illustrates an exemplary spectrum of the output power vs. frequency of transmitter


20


during operation to the desired operating frequency ν


0


taken at point P


i


of device


10


.

FIG. 3

also shows the output power of an adjacent channel within the communication system having frequency ν


j


generated by another light source which may or may not have a similar configuration to device


10


. As can be seen, when the injection current applied to transmitter


20


increases, as referenced by curve I, the output power of the transmitter increases while the lasing frequency drops from its approximate initial value ν


k


to its desired operating frequency ν


0


. During this frequency transition, transmitter


20


generates an optical signal having a frequency within the adjacent channel frequency ν


j


resulting in crosstalk associated with that channel.




The transmittance vs. frequency spectrum of an exemplary filtering element


40


in accordance with the present invention is shown in FIG.


4


. As can be seen from the transmission curve, filtering element


40


is configured to have a high transmission characteristic for signals having a frequency of ν


0


and a low transmission characteristic for frequencies in the Δν bandwidth. Filtering element


40


is used as a low-pass filter associated with transmitter


20


to block or reflect the signals having frequency values outside the desired operating frequency ν


0


. Filtering element


40


is configured such that the full width half maximum reflectivity bandwidth Δν is wider than the maximum frequency variation of laser transmitter


40


which is also larger than the channel spacing in the WDM system. For example, with reference to the values associated with

FIG. 1

where the frequency variation was 58 GHz, the reflectivity bandwidth Δν must be greater than 58 GHz. Typical values for maximum frequency variation are 70 GHz for a ridge-waveguide laser, and 25 GHz for a BH (buried heterostructure) laser. Since the normalized bandwidth (Δλ/λ) of a fiber grating can be manufactured between 10


−4


by varying the induced index change and grating length, the required bandwidth Δν can be easily obtained using a Bragg grating.





FIG. 5

illustrates the output power vs. frequency spectrum taken at point P


0


of device


10


. As a result of using filtering element


40


with the above referenced transmission characteristic, cross talk induced by variations in the injection current associated with transmitter


20


is substantially reduced or eliminated. Signals corresponding to the desired operating frequency ν


0


are allowed to pass through filtering element


40


. The signals outside the operating frequency are reflected by filtering element


40


.




Once the operating frequency, e.g. ν


0


, of transmitter


20


is obtained, the laser needs to be locked preferably at an inflection point referenced by point A in FIG.


4


. To lock laser transmitter


20


at the desired frequency, a portion of the reflected signal from filtering element


40


is supplied to signal processing circuitry


50


by way of tap


35


and line


55


. Similarly, a portion of the transmitted signal is supplied to signal processing circuitry via tap


45


and line


60


. Signal processing circuitry includes photodetectors for receiving the reflected and transmitted optical signals via lines


55


and


60


respectively. The photodetectors generate electrical signals in response to these received optical signals. The electrical signals are supplied to a microprocessor unit which is configured to calculate the second derivative of the reflection spectrum on the low frequency edge, (i.e., the portion of the transmissivity or reflectivity curve


90


closest to frequency ν


0


) of the curve in

FIG. 4

associated with filtering element


40


used to lock laser transmitter


20


.




The locking procedure first determines the operating temperature T


0


associated with the laser transmitter at the desired frequency ν


0


.

FIG. 6

illustrates a laser frequency variation as a function of an exemplary laser TEC temperature. The frequency decreases substantially linearly with an increase in temperature. The second derivative of the reflected signal, d


2


R/dν


2


or its equivalent d


2


R/dT


2


is evaluated where R represents the reflectivity function at the low frequency edge


90


of the transmission/reflectivity spectrum of filtering element


40


shown in FIG.


4


. The temperature of laser transmitter


20


is adjusted to the maximum value of this second derivative d


2


R/dν


2


of the reflectivity function. The second derivative of the reflectivity function is taken instead of the transmitted portion of the signal for frequency locking because the reflected signal provides larger signal dynamic range, as well as providing a fixed base line reference for signal detection. It should be noted that the second derivative d


2


R/dν


2


can be evaluated by using the central difference formula: δ


2


R


n


=R


n+1


−2R


n


+R


n−1


, where n is the number of the particular temperature variation steps, and R


n−1


, R


n


and R


n+1


are the reflectivity values at steps, n−1, n, and n+1, respectively.





FIG. 7

illustrates the first and second derivatives of the grating reflectivity spectrum. As can be seen in

FIG. 7

, the 3 dB bandwidth for the second derivative d


2


R/dν


2


is approximately 4 GHz while the bandwidth from the first zero point


100


to the second zero point


105


around the peak


110


is approximately 14 GHz. Since the accuracy of TEC temperature control can reach 0.025° C., while a typical frequency tunability for a DFB laser is 12 GH/° C., the frequency tuning step size therefore can be as small as 0.3 GHz. Compared with the wide bandwidth of d


2


R/dν


2


, this small tuning step enables a very tight frequency locking.

FIG. 7

also shows the first derivative spectrum dR/dν. The peak separation between the first derivative of the reflectivity function dR/dν and the second derivative of the reflectivity function d


2


R/dν


2


is 5.2 GHz, which allows the first derivative dR/dν to provide additional locking information for control circuitry


50


. Because the grating transmittance at a frequency corresponding to the peak of the second derivative of the reflectivity function d


2


R/dν


2


is 92% of its maximum value, most of the incoming signal will be transmitted. Thus, by using the second derivative of the reflectivity spectrum, the peak is sharp enough and the bandwidth is wide enough to allow for a tight frequency locking of laser transmitter


20


.




While the foregoing invention has been described in terms of the embodiments discussed above, numerous variations are possible. Accordingly, modifications and changes such as those suggested above, but not limited thereto, are considered to be within the scope of the following claims.



Claims
  • 1. A method for stabilizing the operating frequency of an output signal associated with a light source, said light source having an operating temperature corresponding to said operating frequency, a filtering element coupled to said light source having a reflectivity/transmission spectrum over a range of frequencies, said method comprising the stepscalculating a second derivative of said reflectivity spectrum associated with a particular frequency within said range; determining a maximum value of said second derivative, said maximum value corresponding to said operating frequency; and adjusting said operating temperature of said light source based on said maximum value of said derivative.
  • 2. The method in accordance with claim 1 wherein said reflectivity spectrum includes a low frequency edge, said step of determining a maximum value associated with said particular frequency further comprising the step of calculating said maximum value at said low frequency edge.
  • 3. The method of claim 1, wherein said reflectivity spectrum includes a low frequency edge, said step of determining a maximum value associated with said particular frequency further comprising the step of calculating said maximum value at said low frequency edge.
  • 4. A method for stabilizing the operating frequency of an output signal associated with a light source, said light source having an operating temperature corresponding to said operating frequency, a filtering element coupled to said light source having a reflectivity/transmission spectrum over a range of frequencies, said method comprising the steps of:calculating a derivative of said reflectivity spectrum associated with a particular frequency within said range; determining a maximum value of said derivative, said maximum value corresponding to said operating frequency; and adjusting said operating temperature of said light source based on said maximum value of said derivative.
  • 5. An optical device for reducing crosstalk associated with an optical transmitter comprising:a light source configured to generate a light signal at a particular frequency, said light source having an operating temperature corresponding to said operating frequency; a filtering element coupled to said light source along an optical path, said filtering element having a reflectivity/transmission spectrum over a range of frequencies; a control circuit coupled to said light source and said filtering element, said control circuit being configured to determine a derivative of said reflectivity spectrum associated with a particular frequency within said range, determine a maximum value of said derivative, said maximum value corresponding to said operating frequency, and adjust said operating temperature of said light source based on said maximum value of said derivative.
  • 6. An optical device in accordance with claim 5, wherein said filtering element includes an in-fiber Bragg grating.
  • 7. An optical device in accordance with claim 5, further comprising a splitting element coupled to said filtering element along said optical path, said splitting element configured to tap said first portion of said optical signal.
  • 8. An optical device in accordance with claim 5, wherein said optical source includes a distributed feedback laser.
US Referenced Citations (11)
Number Name Date Kind
5077816 Glomb et al. Dec 1991
5299212 Koch et al. Mar 1994
5384550 Henely et al. Jan 1995
5696859 Onaka et al. Dec 1997
5875273 Mizrahi et al. Feb 1999
5917179 Yao Jun 1999
5943152 Mizrahi et al. Aug 1999
5982963 Feng et al. Nov 1999
6024455 O'Neil et al. Feb 2000
6067181 Mizrahi May 2000
6134253 Munks et al. Oct 2000
Non-Patent Literature Citations (4)
Entry
McCadams, et al., “Increase in Semiconductor Laser Modulation Response to FM to AM Conversion in Transmission Through Fiber Grating”, CLEO'97, Paper CThW6, pp. 447-448. No month.
Woodward, et al., “Wavelength Stabilization of a DBR Laser Using a In-Fiber Bragg Filter”, IEEE Photonics Technology Letters, vol. 5, No. 6, 6/93, pp. 628-630.
Lee, et al., “Reduction of Chirping Penalty in Directly Modulated Multigigabit Transmission Systems by Spectral Filtering”, CLEO'95, Paper Ctu10, pp. 93-94. No month.
Morton, et al., “High-speed, Low Chirp, Directly Modulated 1.55-μm DFB Laser Sources for 10 Gbit/s Local Distribution”, OFC'96 Technical Digest, Paper TuH6, pp. 39-40. No month.