This disclosure relates generally to pile supports for bridges and other structures, wherein the piles are driven into the earth and backfilled earthen materials and the like are placed about the pile. More specifically, this disclosure relates to an improved friction reduction pile jacket placed about the pile which reduces and remediates the downward-settling forces of the settling backfilled earthen materials from applying an adverse downward load to a pile.
In the construction of bridges and other structures in which pile supports are driven into the earth and are used as supports for the bridge, etc., it is common to form abutment walls about the piles and to backfill the space between abutment walls and the piles with backfilled earthen materials and other materials. For example, U.S. Pat. No. 3,981,038 discloses a backfilled barrier wall formed of panels mounted one upon the other and held together with elongated reinforcing straps. As the wall is constructed, the backfilled earthen material is placed in layers beside the wall about the supporting piles of the bridge abutment. These constructions are referred to in the industry as Mechanically Stabilized Earth (MSE) wall structures.
One of the problems encountered with bridges and other structures supported by piles with backfilled earthen materials placed about the piles is that the backfilled earthen materials placed about the pile tend to settle over a length of time, and the downward movement of the backfilled earthen materials applies an adverse downward load to the piles. The surface friction created by the settling of the backfilled earthen materials in contact with the surface facing of the piles tends to transmit a substantial amount of adverse vertical load to the pile. This load tends to adversely affect the piles, sometimes causing enough stress that the piles may bend or otherwise become deformed, affecting the integrity of the structure supported.
One technique for avoiding the application of the downward force from the backfill material against piles is to surround the piles with metal or plastic conduits prior to the backfilled earthen material being placed about the piles and to fill the tubes with sand, or the like. As a result, the downward settling movement of the backfilled earthen material is applied to the exterior surfaces of the conduit in lieu of the exterior surfaces of the pile. This technique generally protects the pile from the downward forces of the backfill earth.
While the aforementioned conduit and sand technique has been successful in avoiding adverse effects on bridge abutment piles, etc., due to the downward weight applied by the settling backfilled earthen materials, the use of the conduits and sand utilizing this technique is expensive in that the materials are relatively expensive, and the labor required to telescopically mount the conduits over the piles and then to fill the conduits with sand is expensive.
One technique for overcoming the aforementioned limitations is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,721,418, in which a pile jacket, formed of laminated sheet material, such as polyethylene, is placed about a pile. When the load or weight of the backfilled earthen material tends to settle, it tends to move the pile jacket downwardly with respect to the pile, with the interfacing surfaces of the pile and the pile jacket forming a slip plane. In this manner, the jacket shields the pile from the downward force exerted by the downwardly-moving backfill material during settlement. The patent discloses that a worker could coat either the outer surfaces of the pile, or the inner surfaces of the pile jacket, with a lubricant, such as grease, to reduce the friction within the slip plane. However, in practice, it has been found that grease or other lubricants attract debris during pile settlement, thereby actually increasing the friction within the slip plane. A drawback of the '418 pile jacket relates to the manufacture of the sheet material for the pile jacket. Polyolefin films exhibit a high degree of tackiness in their natural state. This tackiness creates a problem during the manufacturing process.
It is well known that certain polymers and additives can serve to reduce both static and dynamic coefficients of friction greatly. A sheet or spray coating of PTFE (poly tetra fluoro ethylene) possesses one of the lowest coefficients of friction known. Recently, it has been shown proven that diamonds covered with a graphene sheet has the lowest measured coefficient of friction. However; these techniques are more expensive and impractical to use. History has proven the need to work within practical and economic boundaries in most applications.
The need persists in the art for an improved pile jacket.
Disclosed is a friction reducing jacket for application to a pile including an exterior surface and a substantially uniform cross sectional shape along its length, the jacket constructed of sheet material surrounding the pile and formed in a shape conforming to the exterior surface of the pile, the sheet material comprising a thermoplastic polymer and a slip agent. The slip agent can comprise an amide. The slip agent can be a migrating slip agent.
Also disclosed is a method of shielding a pile from downward force exerted by backfilled earthen materials during settlement, the pile including an exterior surface and a substantially uniform cross sectional shape along its length, including the steps of providing a friction reducing jacket constructed of sheet material formed in a shape conforming to the exterior surface of the pile, the sheet material comprising a thermoplastic polyolefin and an amide slip agent; driving the pile into soil, leaving a portion of the pile above the soil exposed, thereby defining an exposed portion of the pile; wrapping the friction reducing pile jacket around the exterior surface of the exposed portion of the pile such that the interior surface of the jacket contacts the exposed exterior surface of the pile, thereby forming a jacketed section of the pile; and placing backfilled earthen materials around the jacketed section of the pile.
Various implementations described in the present disclosure may include additional systems, methods, features, and advantages, which may not necessarily be expressly disclosed herein but will be apparent to one of ordinary skill in the art upon examination of the following detailed description and accompanying drawings. It is intended that all such systems, methods, features, and advantages be included within the present disclosure and protected by the accompanying claims.
The features and components of the following figures are illustrated to emphasize the general principles of the present disclosure. Corresponding features and components throughout the figures may be designated by matching reference characters for the sake of consistency and clarity.
Disclosed is a friction reduction pile jacket and associated methods, systems, devices, and various apparatus. The pile jacket includes a sheet of thermoplastic, e.g., polyolefin, material comprising a slip agent, such as an amide. It would be understood by one skilled in the art that the disclosed pile jacket is described in but a few exemplary embodiments among many. No particular terminology or description should be considered limiting on the disclosure or the scope of any claims issuing therefrom.
One embodiment of a friction reduction pile jacket is disclosed and described in
The pile 12 is sized to accommodate the load transferred from the structure it supports, e.g., bridge abutment 14. The backfilled earthen materials 16 impose a direct surcharge load upon the soil 13. Due to this surcharge load, the soil 13 beneath is compressed, resulting in settlement of the construction materials and the backfilled earthen materials 16. The settlement of the backfilled earthen materials 16 causes downdrag forces upon the pile 12. This downdrag load is also sometimes referred to as negative skin friction and requires remedial efforts to mitigate its effects. The downdrag load is mitigated by placing the pile jacket 10 around the driven pile 12 during construction, in the manner discussed below.
Referring to
Again referring to
The sheet of thermoplastic material can be comprised of a polyolefin. A polyolefin material comprising the pile jacket 10 is preferably polypropylene. A commercially available suitable polypropylene sheet material is from Corex Plastics Pty, Ltd. of Victoria, Australia. However, other embodiments of the present invention can use polyolefins other than polypropylene. For example, the sheet could be constructed of polyethylene instead of polypropylene. The polyolefin can be virgin or recycled materials so long as the resulting jacket has the desired coefficient of friction properties and no detrimental properties for the jacket's end use. It has been proven in application, that polypropylene performs best, because it is easy to produce, it is higher purity, has a lower melting point, greater stiffness, it has better resistance to cracking, is lighter weight, and has high resistance to chemicals including acids and organic solvents. One of ordinary skill in the art can determine an appropriate polymeric material for construction of the pile jacket.
The coefficient of sliding friction within the slip plane defined between the interior surface 30 of the pile jacket 10 and the exterior pile surface 28 is dramatically reduced when the pile jacket 10 is fabricated with improved friction reduction additives. It has been found that by introducing certain quantities of slip agent additives, such as amide agents, greater friction reduction can be achieved between an, e.g., extruded polypropylene pile jacket 10 comprising an amide slip agent and a driven pile 12 in order to enhance downdrag reduction, as compared to pile jackets heretofore used.
Polyolefin films exhibit a degree of tackiness in their natural state. This tackiness creates a problem during the manufacturing process. In order to improve the material's ability to separate and slide during manufacturing, slip additives have been introduced to enhance this capability. Slip additives are used to resist the friction of the polymer material sliding over itself and over parts of the manufacturing equipment during the manufacturing process. Slip additives can be comprised of amides. Common types of amide slip agents are oleamide and erucamide additives, although other amides can be used. Preferred slip agents include migratory slip agents.
Effectiveness of these slip additives is normally determined by the coefficient of friction (COF) it allows. The COF is usually measured using a Standard Method of Testing, ASTM D-1894. COF is a ratio of the force required to slide one layer of material across another relative to the gravimetric force exerted upon it. A similar method of testing, described in the Example below, has shown that the same slip additive will improve the COF results in sliding over other substrates such as steel and concrete in a much similar manner resulting in enhanced material performance.
The concentration of slip agent used can be, for example, about 1 wt % to about 2 wt % of the polymer. One skilled in the art can determine an appropriate concentration of slip agent for generating the desired end properties specified for the jacket. For example, one might want to also print company branding on the pile jacket, in which case the coefficient of friction should not be so low as to prevent printing inks from being applied and adhering to the exterior surface of a jacket. The slip agent used can, for example, be one commercially available from Croda International PLC, of East Yorkshire, United Kingdom, under the mark CRODAMIDE®.
Two types of polypropylene pile jacket materials were tested, namely: (1) a first-generation pile jacket sheet, with no slip agent additives, of the type disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,721,418, and (2) a pile jacket sheet of the type disclosed herein, which includes an amide slip agent additive. Seven sheets of each type of material were cut and brought into contact with steel plates, which were previously unused, thus eliminating the effect of the plastic material rubbing off of the sheet onto the steel plate and affecting the results. For each set of data, the normal force applied included calibrated weights of 10 Kg (22.05 lb.), 20 Kg (44.09 lb.), and 30 Kg (66.14 lb.). The plates were advanced using a worm gear mechanical jacking apparatus, namely, the base of a Marshall testing machine, oriented in a horizontal position. The horizontal load applied was determined utilizing a calibrated load cell. The maximum load achieved prior to sliding was recorded for each normal force applied for each plate tested. The force required to slide the plate was divided by the normal force to arrive at a coefficient of sliding friction. The coefficients of sliding friction obtained for each trial were averaged. The following table summarizes the results:
The 0.04 difference between the two samples represents a 13.1% reduction in the coefficient of sliding friction achieved by the samples containing the amide slip agent additive.
The disclosed embodiment of the present invention encompasses several variations. For instance, although the disclosed pile jacket was discussed with reference to circular piles, the same concept can be applied to piles having different shapes, such as an H-shape cross section.
One should note that conditional language, such as, among others, “can,” “could,” “might,” or “may,” unless specifically stated otherwise, or otherwise understood within the context as used, is generally intended to convey that certain embodiments include, while other embodiments do not include, certain features, elements and/or steps. Thus, such conditional language is not generally intended to imply that features, elements and/or steps are in any way required for one or more particular embodiments or that one or more particular embodiments necessarily include logic for deciding, with or without user input or prompting, whether these features, elements and/or steps are included or are to be performed in any particular embodiment.
It should be emphasized that the above-described embodiments are merely possible examples of implementations, merely set forth for a clear understanding of the principles of the present disclosure. Many variations and modifications may be made to the above-described embodiment(s) without departing substantially from the spirit and principles of the present disclosure. Further, the scope of the present disclosure is intended to cover any and all combinations and sub-combinations of all elements, features, and aspects discussed above. All such modifications and variations are intended to be included herein within the scope of the present disclosure, and all possible claims to individual aspects or combinations of elements or steps are intended to be supported by the present disclosure.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1709893 | Bemis | Apr 1929 | A |
1947413 | Hay | Feb 1934 | A |
2706498 | Upson | Apr 1955 | A |
2928411 | Johnson | Mar 1960 | A |
3141306 | Liddell | Jul 1964 | A |
3166871 | Simison | Jan 1965 | A |
3176021 | Volungis | Mar 1965 | A |
3327441 | Kelley | Jun 1967 | A |
3352120 | Pelzer | Nov 1967 | A |
3403520 | Goodman | Oct 1968 | A |
3487646 | Gatier | Jan 1970 | A |
3495565 | Gustavii | Feb 1970 | A |
3963056 | Shibuya et al. | Jun 1976 | A |
3981038 | Vidal | Sep 1976 | A |
4019301 | Fox | Apr 1977 | A |
4069677 | Yamada et al. | Jan 1978 | A |
4081941 | Van Ausdall | Apr 1978 | A |
4114388 | Straub | Sep 1978 | A |
4119511 | Christenson | Oct 1978 | A |
4157287 | Christenson | Jun 1979 | A |
4347019 | Metz | Aug 1982 | A |
4386876 | Dupeuble | Jun 1983 | A |
4397589 | Darroussin et al. | Aug 1983 | A |
4464083 | Wathey | Aug 1984 | A |
4510281 | Smith | Apr 1985 | A |
4585681 | Kidera et al. | Apr 1986 | A |
RE32325 | Smith | Jan 1987 | E |
4721418 | Queen | Jan 1988 | A |
4818148 | Takeda et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
5145284 | Hulett et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5213166 | Watanabe et al. | May 1993 | A |
5226751 | Doleshal | Jul 1993 | A |
5333971 | Lewis | Aug 1994 | A |
5763047 | Green | Jun 1998 | A |
5931604 | Queen | Aug 1999 | A |
6234720 | Queen | May 2001 | B1 |
6471446 | Queen | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6593280 | Matsunaga et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6616381 | Larsen, Jr. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
20070203273 | Van Riel | Aug 2007 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1173701 | Mar 1959 | FR |
60-223521 | Nov 1985 | JP |
2004001139 | Dec 2003 | WO |
Entry |
---|
A. Schulman Inc.; Article entitled: “Additive Slip”, located at <http://www.aschulman.com/Americas/Masterbatch/CategoryPlusFunctionality/84096/33/Additive-Slip.aspx>, Accessed on Nov. 5, 2014, 2 pgs. |
Article entitled: “Slip Additives”, Ampacet Managing the Elements of Success; Technical Service Report; Publicly available prior to Jul. 16, 2015, 3 pgs. |
CRODA; Article entitled: “Crodamide slip & anti-block for easier processing & handling of polyolefins”, CRODA Polymer Additives; Publicly available prior to Jul. 16, 2015, 6 pgs. |
Queen, Frankie A.R.; Applicant Interview Summary for U.S. Appl. No. 06/941,770, filed Dec. 15, 1986, dated Jun. 11, 1987, 4 pgs. |
Queen, Frankie A.R.; Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 08/982,854, filed Dec. 2, 1997, dated Oct. 8, 1998, 21 pgs. |
Queen, Frankie A.R.; Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 09/353,760, fiiled Jul. 14, 1999, dated Sep. 5, 2000, 5 pgs. |
Queen, Frankie A.R.; Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 06/941,770, filed Dec. 15, 1986, dated Aug. 27, 1987, 10 pgs. |
Queen, Frankie A.R.; Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 06/941,770, filed Dec. 15, 1986, dated Mar. 17, 1987, 5 pgs. |
Queen, Frankie A.R.; Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 08/982,854, filed Dec. 2, 1997, dated Mar. 15, 1999, 16 pgs. |
Queen, Frankie A.R.; Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 09/353,760, fiiled Jul. 14, 1999, dated Jan. 2, 2001, 3 pgs. |
Queen, Frankie A.R.; Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 09/863,633, filed May 21, 2001, dated Jul. 16, 2002, 4 pgs. |
Sherman, Lilli; Article entitled: “Get the Right Additives for mLLDPE Film”, Plastics Technology Jul. 2000, located at <http://www.ptonline.com/articles/get-the-right-additives-for-mlldpe-film>, Accessed on Nov. 5, 2014, 5 pgs. |
Proceedings International Conference on Design and Construction of Deep Foundations, vol. II, Sessions 1 through 4, Dec. 1994, 15 pgs. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170016197 A1 | Jan 2017 | US |