Frictional trans-epithelial tissue disruption collection apparatus and method of inducing an immune response

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 11213664
  • Patent Number
    11,213,664
  • Date Filed
    Sunday, March 31, 2019
    5 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, January 4, 2022
    2 years ago
Abstract
The invention relates to trans-epithelial frictionally abrasive tissue sampling devices for performing biopsies and methods of inducing an immune response against a pathogen, wherein epithelial cells containing the pathogen are disrupted with the frictionally abrasive tissue sampling device to introduce the pathogen into the bloodstream of a patient.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The invention relates to epithelial tissue sampling and collection devices for performing biopsies from lesions and anatomical landmarks at risk of neoplastic transformation, including but not limited to the squamo-columnar junction of the female cervix, methods of inducing an immune response against a pathogen and methods of trans-epithelial drug delivery.


DESCRIPTION OF THE RELATED ART

Previous devices include brushes with rigid bristles that puncture and shear epithelial surfaces (U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,535,756; 6,258,044; 6,376,905; 6,494,845 and 6,132,421), single metal or plastic curettes that extend in a parallel direction to the applicator handle and are much larger than the innovation (U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,641,662 and 6,730,085), scalpels or similar bladed sharp cutting tools (U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,857,982; 5,800,362; 3,774,590; 5,092,345; 4,061,146; 5,868,668; 6,053,877; 5,470,308; 7,137,956, 4,168,698 and 4,757,826; and U.S. Publication Nos. 2005/0059905 and 2007/0093727), or very large electrified metal loops used to produce excisional biopsies (U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,913,857 and 5,951,550). One device performs simultaneous brush cytology and scrape biopsy on structures with an organic duct (U.S. Pat. No. 5,535,756).


Human papillomaviruses (HPV) are responsible for many cutaneous and mucosal lesions. Some viral genotypes are considered to be the causal agents of cervical cancer. Natural genital HPV infection seems to be poorly immunogenic because of its nonproductive and non-inflammatory characteristics and also because of mechanisms developed by the virus to counteract the immune response.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

A first aspect relates to a fabric for functionally abrading epithelial surfaces including a backing material and a plurality of fenestrated loops attached to the backing material, the loops having sufficient flexibility and rigidity to frictionally abrade the epithelial surfaces, wherein the loops are about 3 mm to about 25 mm in length, wherein the loops have a short hook end, and wherein the distance from the top of the loop to the bottom of the hook is less than 50% of the length of the loop.


A second aspect relates to an apparatus for obtaining a histological sample including a handle, a platform at a distal end of the handle, and a fabric for functionally abrading epithelial surfaces including a backing material and a plurality of fenestrated loops attached to the backing material (26).


A third aspect relates to a method of inducing an immune response against a pathogen that normally evades the immune system including disrupting epithelial cells containing the pathogen with a frictional trans-epithelial tissue disruption apparatus, and thereby introducing the pathogen, DNA fragments, proteins or antigenic material into the bloodstream of a patient to elicit an immune response.


A fourth aspect relates to a method of trans-epithelial drug delivery including disrupting tissue with a trans-epithelial tissue disruption apparatus and applying a drug to intra-epithelial and sub-epithelial spaces created by the disrupting tissue.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1. Apparatus for frictional trans-epithelial tissue disruption of an epithelial flat surface;



FIG. 2(A). Apparatus for frictional trans-epithelial tissue disruption of an epithelial-lined canal surface with tapered cone tip, Side view; FIG. 2(B). apparatus for frictional trans-epithelial tissue disruption of an epithelial-lined canal surface with tapered cone tip, oblique view; FIG. 2(C). apparatus for frictional trans-epithelial tissue disruption of an epithelial-lined canal surface with tapered cone tip, top view;



FIG. 3(A). Schematic diagram showing a method of frictional trans-epithelial tissue disruption of a flat epithelial surface; or FIG. 3(B). schematic diagram showing a method of frictional trans-epithelial tissue disruption of an epithelial surface of a canal or body cavity;



FIG. 4. Frictional trans-epithelial tissue disruptor with a motorized or vibratory handle used to spin or agitate the fenestrated loops;



FIG. 5. Schematic diagram of an apparatus with a detachable platform that anchors fiber loops at a distal end of the handle;



FIG. 6(A). Schematic diagram of frictional trans-epithelial tissue disruption showing representation of tissue with a squamous epithelial lined surface; FIG. 6(B). Schematic diagram of frictional trans-epithelial tissue disruption with application of the frictional biopsy device to the body surface; FIG. 6(C). Schematic diagram of frictional trans-epithelial tissue disruption where simultaneous pressure, agitational, and rotational force splays and separates the hooks/loops. Frictional abrasive forces create heat which buckles the epithelial surface; FIG. 6(D). Schematic diagram of frictional trans-epithelial tissue disruption where sufficient abrasion creates shearing and fracture of the epithelial surface at varying depths which could include fracture through the basement membrane into the subcutaneous layer; FIG. 6(E). Schematic diagram of frictional trans-epithelial tissue disruption where the hooks insinuate into the fracture plane, and with additional abrasive forces continue to shear the tissue fragments, while simultaneously retaining the tissue for capture and collection; FIG. 6(F). Schematic diagram of frictional trans-epithelial tissue disruption at the completion of the biopsy process, the collection of hooks arranged in rows create channels which collect and sequester the tissue and cell cluster fragments within the channels created in the device. When the device is removed from the epithelial surface, additional sample is captured and held due to the flexibility and recoil of the hooks;



FIG. 7(A). Side view of a focal biopsy apparatus, depicted at the outer lip of the cervix (exocervix); FIG. 7(B). Schematic diagram of apparatus for focal biopsies with an enlarged view of the platform and loops;



FIG. 8(A). Side view of apparatus for simultaneous biopsy of epithelial surfaces and canal-like surfaces. Longer central core fibers to insinuate into a canal and a perimeter of approximately 3 mm fibers contact an outer epithelial surface; FIG. 8(B). Schematic diagram of apparatus for simultaneous biopsy of epithelial surfaces and canal-like surfaces with enlarged view of platform and loops.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
Definitions

The transitional term “comprising” is synonymous with “including,” “containing,” or “characterized by,” is inclusive or open-ended and does not exclude additional, unrecited elements or method steps.


The transitional phrase “consisting of” excludes any element, step, or ingredient not specified in the claim, but does not exclude additional components or steps that are unrelated to the invention such as impurities ordinarily associated therewith.


The transitional phrase “consisting essentially of” limits the scope of a claim to the specified materials or steps and those that do not materially affect the basic and novel characteristic(s) of the claimed invention.


As used herein, the term “fenestrated loop” refers to a hooked, “candy-cane” shape formed by severing a loop, wherein a short, hooked end is less than about 50% of the length of the loop. In some embodiments, a fenestrated loop is formed by severing a loop once, leaving a short arm adjacent to the fenestrated loop.


Focal Biopsy


Some embodiments relate to a trans-epithelial, frictional tissue sampling and collection device to perform biopsies of lesions suspected of harboring disease. In some embodiments, a lesional biopsy site is no larger than about 10 mm in diameter (i.e., focal biopsy). In some embodiments the lesions are accessible to an examiner during routine examination. In other embodiments, the surface is accessible following entry into a body cavity through a natural orifice or surgical channel via a trochar and inspection using an endoscope with a biopsy port. The device head remains on the lesion or area of intended biopsy/therapy due to the rigid nature of the applicator. Referring to FIG. 7, a focal biopsy apparatus is configured with loops that are about 3 mm to about 25 mm in length, preferably about 3 mm in length, wherein the loops have a short hook end, wherein the distance from the top of the loop to the bottom of the hook is less than 50% of the length of the loop.


Regional Biopsy


In some embodiments, the intent is to biopsy and screen large geographic areas of tissue at risk for disease (e.g., neoplastic transformation such as, but not limited to, the squamo-columnar junction of the female cervix in the presence or absence of visualized lesions). The device provides samples of clumps or clusters of excavated epithelial tissue fragments for analysis, in contrast to other methods disclosed in prior art that provide surface and exfoliated cells by sweeping the cells from such target tissue sites, commonly with blunt spatula or soft bristle brush devices. The intent is to remove tissue based evidence with frictional biopsy of the larger area, which may range from 10-40 millimeters in diameter.


Simultaneous Biopsy of Epithelial Surfaces and Canal-Like Structures


In some embodiments, the device contains a central core of longer fenestrated loops (e.g., about 4-7 mm long), surrounded by a wider rim of shorter fenestrated loops (e.g., about 3 mm in length). The longer loops are geometrically suited to insinuate within a central canal structure, such as the endocervical canal of the cervix. There is simultaneously uniform contact of the fenestrated loop fibers circumferentially around the endocervical canal on the flat exocervical surface. With rotation and agitation in a back-and-forth motion, tissue is harvested within the fenestrated loop channels as described above.


In some embodiments, the device contains a central core of longer fenestrated loops (e.g., about 4-7 mm long), surrounded by a wider rim of shorter fenestrated loops (e.g., about 3 mm in length). The longer loops are geometrically suited to insinuate within a central canal structure, such as the endocervical canal of the cervix. There is simultaneously uniform contact of the fenestrated loop fibers circumferentially around the endocervical canal on the flat exocervical surface. With rotation and agitation in a back-and-forth motion, tissue is harvested within the fenestrated loop channels as described above.


Frictional Tissue Sampling and Collection Biopsy Devices


The frictional tissue sampling and collection biopsy devices disclosed herein utilize a fabric that includes minute plastic (e.g., nylon) fiber loops that are fenestrated at a minimal distance from the apex of the loop. The loops flex but do not fracture under minimal to moderate force or separate under pressure.


The semi-rigid loops may be pressed in a rotational manner (e.g., in sweeping or circular motion) away from or toward the operator, perpendicular, or at an angle into epithelial tissue surfaces. The semi-rigid loops remain flexible enough to cause separation of the fenestrated ends, creating frictional forces sufficient to cause local heating and buckling of the epithelial surface away from the underlying stroma. The loops are fenestrated such that with applied pressure they are flexible enough to open and provide access to a “collection well” for histological fragments. The tips of the fiber hooks are oriented away from the tissue. On pressing and rotation across the tissue surface, the fibers scrape, buckle and shear the epithelium from the underlying stroma. The fragments are excoriated from the tissue surface through the concomitant application of frictional forces applied to the tissue surfaces by the fenestrated loops. The frictional forces overcome the adhesive and binding forces of the tissue below to release fragments of various shapes and size, all eligible for collection in a histology lab, and subsequent processing and analysis.


The semi-rigid loops (e.g., made of nylon) hold the tissue fragments after excoriation because the loops are elastic enough to sufficiently re-close and capture the remove tissue. In addition, the spaces between the fibers also retain excoriated tissue. The frictional forces exceed the binding forces afforded by adhesion molecules which anchor epithelia to the basement membrane, as well as disrupting Van der Waals forces.


Once the epithelium is frictionally sheared from the underlying stroma, the tissue clumps and epithelial fragments are swept and excavated by the distal most curved apex of the loop and entrapped within the geometrically suited spaces between the closed, fenestrated loops. Thus, the method is frictional abrasion, excavation via rotation and other directional motion, and tissue collection within inter-loop channels.


The fabric can be cut into uniform shapes such as a circular disc or straight edge shape(s) and with uniform height, allowing the device to provide 360 degree coverage of tissue surfaces over suspected lesions, without a gap within the circumference of the device. This is in distinction to bristle brushes which are spiral or bent in shape, which present surface gaps that do not allow uniforms contact with the target tissue, and gaps that cause migration of the device from the lesion site toward the direction of rotation when such devices are pressed onto lesions and rotated or moved for tissue harvesting.


Following biopsy, the fabric, fibers, and/or device head (all with the tissue entrapped between the fibers) are removed and placed in a vial of liquid fixative for later laboratory work. A laboratory may remove the tissue from the device and process it for analysis. Therefore, one may intentionally design the device in an embodiment in which the user could easily decouple the device head from the device shaft. For example, some embodiments may have the shaft inserted into the head via a clip or screw thread mechanism, a key-in-lock design with a pressure release button, or a luer-lock type of attachment. Once the biopsy is obtained, the head and handle/shaft parts can be de-coupled, wherein the handle can be discarded, or sterilized and re-used, and the head immersed in a vial of fixative.


Some methods for removal of tissue from the fiber assembly include rinsing under pressure, immersion and agitation manually or mechanically, or by sonication. Alternatively, the fibers can be sheared from the fabric on telfa or other filter paper, and the fibers plucked off the paper leaving the entire biopsy specimen. Alternatively, after tissue is collected into the device channels, tissue may deposited via rotation or agitation in a vial of liquid fixative, rinsed off the device under pressurized spraying, or removed from the nylon fibers by cutting away the nylon fibers from the fabric (e.g., onto filter paper), thus leaving the tissue on the paper, which can be immersed in fixative.


In preferred embodiments, the fabric fibers are manufactured in a similar manner to Velcro® or other hook and pile type fastener, where strands are longer than conventional hook and pile, about 3 mm in length, fenestrated closer to the apex of the loop instead of close to the base of one arm of the loop, and thus appear V-wishbone shaped. They have a short hook end with the curvature starting at 2 mm from the base. Because the loop strands are longer, they flex and bend to a greater angle and twist with greater elasticity when rotated or agitated when compared with standard Velcro® Because the fenestration is closer to the base in standard Velcro®, the loops fenestrations are unlikely to separate, leaving the curved smooth surface of the loop in contact with the tissue, not providing sufficient frictional forces during rotation to shear and separate the epithelium form the underlying basement membrane and stroma.


Preferred embodiments utilize minute plastic fenestrated loops that are pressed perpendicular or at an angle into epithelial tissue surfaces which, upon rotational or agitational pressure forces, cause tissue epithelial fragments to be frictionally separated from the underlying tissue basement membrane and stroma. The channels between the fenestrated loops entrap and collect the tissue fragments. The process is similar to curettage with a blunt curved tool, which also scrapes, shears and strips epithelium from the underlying stroma of target tissues. On the other hand, the process is in contrast to sharp curettage where the purposefully sharp edge of the curette first incises, pierces, then shaves and scoops epithelium and underlying stroma from the tissue surface. The process described herein is less perceptible to patients than conventional biopsies and causes a smaller amount of blood loss and trauma.


In one aspect, the present invention relates to a frictional trans-epithelial tissue apparatus. In some embodiments, the apparatus comprises 3 mm or smaller loops adherent to and projecting perpendicular from a platform, with a density of 5-50 loops per square inch, evenly spaced or arranged in rows. The loops may be intact or fenestrated at the center or at their lateral aspect to allow for added flexibility and constructed from plastic, metal, or another stiff material. The rounded end of the loop is opposite the platform.


Loops of sufficient flexibility to withstand frictional forces and not fracture, and of sufficient tensile strength to generate sufficient frictional shear force during a sweeping or circular motion of the device to remove epithelium from tissue. The space between loops may serve to capture and harbor the sampled tissue.


In some embodiments designed for focal lesional biopsy, a flat, flexible platform, which anchors the loops may be of any size, but is most practically approximately 5-10 mm in diameter and circular in shape. The shape may be another geometrical design if it affords an advantage in covering the target tissue area for sampling. The platform may be hinged in such a way that it can be folded or compressed, inserted through a small endoscopic channel, and then reinstated to its original state as a platform with a sampling surface. It may be comprised of plastic, cloth, or another composite material. The loops are threaded through and project away from the platform towards the tissue surface. Some embodiments may comprise a hub fiber or “pin” that penetrates and anchors the center of the disc on the target biopsy area, serving as a central post to rotate the disc around for stability.


In other embodiments intended to screen a larger, regional tissue site at risk for neoplastic transformation or other disease process, the optimal shape is circular, the diameter could range from about 10-50 mm, and the loops project at varied distances from the platform to towards the tissue surface. For the purpose of histological screening to detect cervical neoplasia, the central 5 mm diameter disc projects longer (5-25 mm) fenestrated loop fibers, and is surrounded circumferentially by the aforementioned approximately 3-23 mm long loop fibers. The longer fibers insinuate inside canal structures, (e.g., the endocervical canal) simultaneously with contact of the shorter fibers with an outer endothelial surface (e.g., the exocervical surface). Upon pressure and rotation or agitation, the endocervical and exocervical tissues can be simultaneously frictionally sheared and collected. Histological screening may be necessary to correctly reflect the presence or absence of epithelial pathology, because adhesion molecules may prevent representative exfoliation from diseased tissue in some cases, leaving cytological screening methods lacking in accuracy.


Preferably, a frictional trans-epithelial biopsy sample is taken from a lesion or an anatomical region that is predisposed to disease.


Some embodiments comprise a plastic, metal, or mixed composition cylinder or curved convex head, which provides a flat surface for the platform to be attached to. It is equal or greater in diameter to the platform. The cylinder is 5-10 mm in length while the flat or convex base is less than about 3 mm thick.


Some embodiments comprise a rod or cylindrical shaped applicator probe comprised of any suitable material (e.g., wood, plastic, paper or metal), which has the base, platform and loop unit at its most distal end, wherein the applicator probe is approximately 2-5 mm in diameter and 15-30 cm in length. It is constructed larger or smaller depending on the access to the tissue surface. The shaft of the rod or cylindrical shaped applicator probe may be rigid or semi-rigid so as to not bow or arc when pressure is transmitted from the handle to the device head.


A handle into which the applicator probe can be transfixed is optionally mechanical, providing motorized rotational, drill-like movement or agitating vibration.


The device handle will be composed of stiff material, preferably plastic similar to Lucite, clear or opaque in coloration, rigid nylon plastic, or alternatively could be wood or metal. The device head can take may shapes, cylindrical or tapered in design, but the distal most platform face is circular, square, or polygonal, and may be composed of plastic, (e.g., nylon). The diameter may range from 5-50 mm. The fabric is welded to the nylon platform ultrasonically, or may alternatively be attached via adhesive, or via a rim or collar (e.g., which snaps on to the platform into a recess in the head of the device).


In some embodiments, the operator examines tissue surfaces and chooses an area to be sampled based on the presence of a suspicious lesion. In other embodiments, the operator chooses an anatomical landmark known to be “at risk” for neoplastic or disease transformation for the purposes of sampling the entire chosen surface.


The handle or applicator probe is grasped at its proximal end or handle.


The distal portion or head of the device that contains the base, platform and loops that project perpendicular from the base towards the tissue surface with the more rounded ends that are pressed against the tissue surface.


With moderate pressure, the examiner simultaneously presses and rotates the device against the tissue several times in a clockwise or counterclockwise direction, opening or separating the fenestrated loops, thus performing frictional disruption of the tissue surface. Alternatively, a sweeping motion may be used. If a motorized handle is used, it can be activated to assist in the rotation or vibration of the device.


The harvested tissue is collected from the tissue surface, and some tissue already trapped in the loops themselves is inspected and can be teased from the loops, or the loops transected from the fabric and separated, and the remaining tissue placed in a fixative solution.


As shown in FIG. 1, fabric with fenestrated loops (1) is connected to platform (2), which is in communication with head (3), located at a distal end of handle (5), optionally including an elongated rod (4). Referring to FIG. 3A, moderate force (8) is applied against a tissue surface (7). The device head is rotated (9) on the surface to frictionally separate or agitate the surface epithelium. The device head is rinsed or placed with tissue in the loops into fixative for subsequent pathological analysis.


An apparatus with a conical platform is depicted in FIG. 2. In FIG. 2A, fabric with fenestrated loops (1) is connected to conical platform (6). Referring to FIG. 3B, an apparatus with a conical platform may be inserted into a canal or cavity. The device head is rotated (9) while maintaining pressure force in direction (8). The device head with tissue in the loops is rinsed or placed into pathological fixative.


An apparatus with a motor configured to rotate the platform is depicted in FIG. 4. Fabric with fenestrated loops (1) is attached to platform (2) on head (3) at the distal end of an elongated rod (4), which is attached to a motorized handle (5).


In some embodiments, the head is detachable from the elongated rod/handle. Referring to FIG. 5, a detachable head configuration allows the distal portion with head (3), platform (2), together with attached fabric containing loops, to be detached and placed into a preservative medium for later tissue removal and pathological processing. Some embodiments may have the shaft inserted into the head via a clip or screw thread mechanism, or a luer-lock type of attachment (23). Tissue fragments that remain attached to the detachable head are in addition to any free tissue obtained and collected from the tissue surface or the device as a result of the frictional tissue sampling.


Referring to FIG. 6, epithelial tissue samples are obtained by frictional trans-epithelial tissue disruption. A representation of tissue with a squamous epithelial lined surface is depicted in panel (A). The squamous epithelial multilayer (11) is shown with superficial flat and basal cuboidal epithelium. Basement membrane (12) separates the squamous epithelial multilayer from the subcutaneous tissue stroma (13) and the underlying sub-stromal tissue (14). FIG. 6B depicts application of the frictional biopsy device to the tissue surface. The device head (3) is applied (24) to a chosen area where curved portions of the fenestrated loops (1) press against the epithelial surface. A representation of two abutting hooks is shown, creating a collection channel. A shorter arm (15), adjacent to the fenestrated loop (1), may remain following severing of an initial continuous loop to create the fenestrated loop. In FIG. 6C, simultaneous pressure, agitational, and rotational force (16) splays and separates the hooks/loops. Frictional abrasive forces create heat which buckles the epithelial surface. Referring to FIG. 6D, sufficient abrasion creates shearing and fracture of the epithelial surface at varying depths which could include fracture through the basement membrane into the subcutaneous layer. As shown in FIG. 6E, the hooks insinuate into the fracture plane, and with additional abrasive forces continue to shear the tissue fragments, while simultaneously retaining the tissue for capture and collection. At the completion of the biopsy process (FIG. 6F), the collection of hooks arranged in rows creates channels that collect and sequester the tissue and cell cluster fragments within the channels. When the device is removed from the epithelial surface, additional sample collection is achieved due to the flexibility and recoil of the hooks.


Referring to FIG. 7A, frictional trans-epithelial tissue disruption with a focal biopsy apparatus is shown at the outer lip of the exocervix (17), alternatively known as the “transformation zone” of the cervix (18). In this configuration, fenestrated loops (1) approximately 3 mm in length are used to disrupt and collect tissue fragments. FIG. 7B depicts an enlarged focal biopsy apparatus, with an enlarged view of fenestrated loops (1) attached to platform (2).


Referring to FIG. 8A, simultaneous trans-epithelial biopsy of epithelial surfaces and canal-like surfaces, in particular, biopsy of the endocervical canal (20) and the exocervical area around the endocervical canal (i.e., the transformation zone) is shown (19). Referring to FIG. 8B, a central core of elongated loops of about 5-25 mm in length (21) are surrounded by a wider rim of shorter fenestrated loops of about 3-23 mm in length (22).


The frictional tissue sampling and collection device can be used on any body surface, both external to the body, body cavities, or on internal organs. To access epithelial surfaces of internal body organs, the device head may be deflated, folded or collapsed to pass through a small aperture or port, and re-opened or expanded to fully expose the fabric to the biopsy surface. This device can be used on humans or any other living organism with an epithelial surface. Any tissue surface may be sampled. The ease of use in each case will be related to the strength of the individual tissue adhesion and binding forces in specific locations. The loops themselves can harvest the tissue and also serve as tissue collection reservoirs for later storage once placed in a fixative medium. The platform with the loops may be detached from any applicator for later examination and processing (i.e., decoupled from the instrument used to press against tissue surfaces to obtain the tissue sample).


If the tissue surface is a canal or concave shaped area of the body, instead of a perpendicular platform design, the loops are directly attached to the probe itself which are gradually tapered at the end to facilitate insertion into the canal. The loops project perpendicularly from the probe surface at its distal end, and the unit, once placed into the canal that is lined on its surface with epithelium, contacts such epithelium snugly.


The loops can be mounted on the platform or project from the rim surface of the platform, perpendicular or at an angle to the platform along the margin of the platform, or attached to other delivery applicators, including the examiner's gloved finger, or other surgical instruments. The platform can be any shape or size which can fit on a tissue surface. The base assembly can be any shape or size, and may be permanently rigid or collapsible.


If the tissue surface lies within a canal shaped tissue surface, the loops can be attached directly to the applicator probe, which can be inserted into the canal shaped body cavity. The probe with the loops projecting from the surface and contacting the epithelium is rotated causing the frictional disruption sampling from the tissue surface. The shape of the probe can be constructed in any shape that allows a snug fit into the canal. The loops may be arranged in rows or equally spaced, allowing for maximal contact and tissue collection.


Some embodiments of the invention comprise a motorized mechanical assistance via a mechanical handle into which the most proximal end of the applicator probe is inserted. Such mechanical assistance may enhance the rotational or vibratory force that the device transmits to the tissue after contact is established. This can increase the frictional forces and the speed of the tissue disruption/sampling and shorten the procedure time.


Preferred Parameters of Fibers


The frictional sampling loops of the invention are collectively referred to as fenestrated loop fibers. In particularly preferred embodiments, the fibers are made using the hooked side of a modified Velcro® or other hook and pile type fastener, where the strands are about 3 mm in length and are V-wishbone shaped. They have a short hook end (25) with the curvature starting at 2 mm from the base. In various embodiments, the loops may be 2.5-25 mm in length, 3-5 mm in length, 3-10 mm in length, 3-15 mm in length, 3-20 mm in length or 3-25 mm in length.


In comparison, standard Velcro® is about 2 mm long and is more hooked. Thus, the loops of the present invention are longer than those of standard Velcro®, they are made of a similar nylon material compared with standard Velcro®, are more flexible when rubbed on a tissue surface due to their length, and they have shorter loops that hook nearer to the end of the strands. In particular, the distance from the top of the loop to the bottom of the hook is preferably less than 50% of the length of the loop, more preferably less than 40%, still more preferably less than 30%, and even more preferably less than 20% the length of the loop. This distance is also preferably at least 1% the length of the loop, more preferably at least 5% the length of the loop, and still more preferably at least 10% the length of the loop. Thus, the invention includes hooks in all of the ranges between any of the preferred minimum distances and any of the preferred maximum distances. The bottoms of the hooks are preferably arranged so that they are all approximately the same distance from the loop, although this is not strictly necessary. Because the hooks are cut at a relatively distal location, the ends of the hooks are more accessible to the tissue surface allowing for uniform transmission of frictional forces to the tissue surface. As a result, the action of the fibers more effectively buckle and shear the tissue, while the loops sweep over and capture the tissue.


In a preferred embodiment, the loop fibers are arranged so as to efficiently capture tissue. Thus, in one preferred embodiment, the fibers are arranged in an orderly orientation. For example, the fibers can be arranged in rows between which the tissue can be captured. The hooks can be arranged to be oriented at approximately the same angle and direction in each of the fibers. Thus, the fibers can be organized such they all have a consistent direction and angle of orientation. In addition, the spacing between each of the fibers can be made to be the same or different.


In use, the device can be oriented so that the fibers are perpendicular to tissue, and then pressure is applied. As a result, the epithelial surface is frictionally sheared. Thus, the fibers are preferably mounted on a flat or curved platform, optimally 4-10 mm in diameter so as optimize this process. However, alternatively shaped platforms can also be used in certain embodiments. Because the fibers can be mounted directly on the platform, which may be flat or slightly curved, the orientation remains evenly spaced and the spaces inside the fenestrated loops and between them remain evenly distributed to facilitate tissue capture.


In some embodiments the platform may in the form of a thumbtack, wherein it is attached to the handle. However, the platform and handle may take on a variety of forms. It is envisioned that the handle and the platform may be molded as one piece, and the fibers (e.g., modified Velcro®) may be attached with adhesive or via ultrasonic or thermal welding of the fabric to the platform.


Method of Inducing an Immune Response by Autoinoculation


In some embodiments, the trans-epithelial, frictional tissue sampling and collection devices described herein are utilized to agitate and disrupt epithelial cells containing a pathogen, or cellular proteins altered by a pathogen, to induce an immune response against the pathogen. This results in auto-inoculation of tissues that harbor pathogens and macromolecules such as virally altered DNA and/or oncogenic proteins. The method may also be termed therapeutic frictional abrasion-excoriation. This method is advantageous when a pathogen is normally able to evade an immune response. For example, some viruses remain in surface epithelial layers where they are sequestered from the immune system. Other viruses may be integrated into cellular DNA, thereby evading immune detection.


The methods of inducing an immune response against a pathogen that normally evades the immune system comprise the steps of a) disrupting epithelial cells containing the pathogen, virally altered DNA, or cellular oncoproteins with a micro-curettage device described herein, and b) introducing the pathogen into the bloodstream of a patient to elicit an immune response.


In some embodiments, the trans-epithelial, frictional tissue sampling and collection devices described herein are utilized to disrupt epithelial cells to induce an immune response against human papillomaviruses (HPVs). HPVs are persistent viruses that can remain in their hosts for long periods of time before causing any ill effects. Generally, the host reacts to viral pathogens by generating both humoral and cell-mediated responses. Humoral responses are typically antibody-mediated and involve the secretion of antibodies such as immunoglobulin A (IgA) and immunoglobulin G (IgG) by B lymphocytes. Cell-mediated responses, on the other hand, are carried out by immune effector cells such as dendritic cells (DCs), natural killer (NK) cells, macrophages and T lymphocytes which secrete a number of cytokines including interferons (INF) and tumor necrosis factor (TNF), and up-regulate the expression of Fas ligand (FasL) and TNF-related apoptosis inducing ligand (TRAIL) on their cell surface.


In the case of HPV infection, the immune response is frequently weak or undetectable, and accompanied by little or no inflammation. Even when an immune response is elicited, it may not be able to clear the virus. Disruption of the epithelial surface by frictional tissue disruption induces repair and inflammation and serves to auto-inoculate the patient. Without wishing to be bound by any theory, exposure of the epithelial surface to frictional tissue disruption, uniquely induced by the apparatus and methods disclosed herein through local heating from friction forces exerted, may enhance the induction of repair, inflammation and an immune response following patient autoinoculation. Agitation or scrubbing of a lesion serves to introduce viral particles into the bloodstream of a patient where they can trigger a humoral or antibody related immune response. In addition the method can fracture cells releasing antigens locally within the tissue stroma inducing a cell mediated response associated with the release of cytokines and attraction of helper and killer T cells to the sampled tissue area.


Advantageously, the method of the present invention auto-inoculates a patient with viral particles of the specific viral serotype(s) that the patient is infected with. In contrast, current vaccine strategies are effective on a subset of HPV strains. For example, GARDASIL® by Merck & Co., Inc. is indicated to help prevent cervical cancer, precancerous and low-grade cervical lesions, vulvar and vaginal pre-cancers and genital warts caused by human papillomavirus (HPV) types 6, 11, 16 and 18 and Cervarix™ by GlaxoSmithKline is an HPV 16/18 cervical cancer candidate vaccine. The vaccine is commonly injected in a limb, not the target organ at risk, the cervix, and has been only documented to elicit a humoral antibody immune reaction.


Drug Application


In some embodiments, an adjuvant drug or an immune modulating agent is used in combination with the autoinoculation method, thus augmenting an immune response. For example, Imiquimod (Aldara® topical cream, manufactured and marketed by Graceway Pharmaceutical Company) is approved for the treatment of actinic keratosis, external genital warts and superficial basal cell carcinoma (sBCC), a type of skin cancer. An immune response may be enhanced by using such immune modulating agents in combination with autoinoculation by the methods described herein. The adjuvant drug can be applied to the fenestrated loop fibers directly akin to toothpaste on a toothbrush, or a channel within the applicator can be used to transmit the drug from the top of the handle by means of a squeeze bulb or syringe, through a small lumen in the center of the fabric disc, concomitant with the tissue disruption, delivering drug into the fracture crevices created during the frictional buckling and shearing process created by the device.


Some embodiments comprise a method of drug delivery to a pathological lesion or areas of tissue that concomitantly disrupts tissue planes, creating crevices or pathways for drugs to enter via intra-epithelial and sub-epithelial spaces. This is in contrast to topical therapies, which are slowly absorbed into and through the epithelia. Intra-lesional application is more focused and requires less drug, presenting less risk of side effects.


Any type of drug (e.g., ablative, antibiotic, antiseptic, immune modulating, etc. may be used.


In some embodiments, drug is delivered via an applicator comprising a fabric with fenestrated loops as described herein. Drug is applied in a manner akin to applying toothpaste to a toothbrush, or drug may injected onto the platform or the apparatus via a channel leading through a hollow applicator handle. The drug application apparatus may optionally have an element through which the drug is delivered (e.g., a syringe with a locking mechanism). Drug is applied to a “wound” created by frictionally agitating the tissue. In some embodiments, the fenestrated loops may be impregnated with a drug during manufacture, wherein the drug leeches out into the disrupted tissue when the fiber contacts and macerates/disrupts the tissue.


While the present invention has been described in some detail for purposes of clarity and understanding, one skilled in the art will appreciate that various changes in form and detail can be made without departing from the true scope of the invention. All figures, tables, and appendices, as well as patents, applications, and publications, referred to above, are hereby incorporated by reference.

Claims
  • 1. A fabric for abrading epithelial surfaces and collecting a histological tissue sample comprising: a backing-material;a plurality of curved fenestrated loops comprising a short hook end and a first length attached to the backing material, where each curved fenestrated loop of the plurality of curved fenestrated loops is formed from each cut of a plurality of cuts on each loop of a plurality of loops at a distal location from the backing material, generating the curved fenestrated loop, where the first length is the distance from the top of the plurality of curved fenestrated loops to the backing material, where the plurality of curved fenestrated loops are arranged to form one or more channels, where the plurality of curved fenestrated loops have sufficient flexibility and rigidity to frictionally abrade an epithelial surface, where the first length is between 3 mm and 25 mm, where a distance from the top of the plurality of curved fenestrated loops to the bottom of the short hook end is less than twenty (20) percent of the first length, where rotation of the fabric pressed against the epithelial surface is adapted to abrade the epithelial surface with the short hook end adapted to release the histological tissue sample; anda plurality of curved short arms with a second length attached to the backing material, where the second length is less than the first length, where the plurality of curved short arms are formed from the plurality of cuts on the plurality of loops, where each curved short arm of the plurality of curved short arms is adjacent to each curved fenestrated loop of the plurality of curved fenestrated loops, where the histological tissue sample is adapted to collect in the plurality of curved short arms, where the plurality of curved fenestrated loops do not fracture or separate under moderate pressure, where under applied pressure when the fabric is pressed and rotated against the epithelial surface the short hook end of the plurality of curved fenestrated loops is adapted to splay and separate from the curved short arms thereby opening a collection well to collect the histological tissue sample.
  • 2. The fabric of claim 1, where the backing material is adapted to be applied to a flexible platform.
  • 3. The fabric of claim 1, where the short hook end is oriented towards the backing material.
  • 4. The fabric of claim 1, where the plurality of curved fenestrated loops are made of plastic.
  • 5. The fabric of claim 1, where the plurality of curved fenestrated loops are made of nylon.
  • 6. A fabric for removing and collecting a histological tissue sample from an epithelial surface comprising: a backing material;a plurality of curved fenestrated loops attached to the backing material each with a first length and including a short hook end, where the plurality of curved fenestrated loops have sufficient flexibility and rigidity to remove, collect and store the histological tissue sample from the epithelial surface, where the first length is between 3 mm and 25 mm, where a distance from the top of the plurality of curved fenestrated loops to the bottom of the short hook end is less than 20% of the first length of the plurality of curved fenestrated loops, where rotation of the fabric pressed against the epithelial surface is adapted to abrade the epithelial surface with the short hook end adapted to release the histological tissue sample; anda plurality of curved short arms with a second length attached to the backing material, where the second length is less than the first length, where each curved short arm of the plurality of curved short arms is adjacent to each curved fenestrated loop of the plurality of curved fenestrated loops, where the curved fenestrated loops do not separate under minimal pressure, where under applied pressure when the fabric is pressed against the epithelial surface the short hook end of the plurality of curved fenestrated loops further separate from the curved short arms thereby providing a collection well formed between the curved short arms and the curved fenestrated loops for the histological tissue sample.
  • 7. The fabric of claim 6, where the backing material is adapted to be applied to a flexible platform.
  • 8. The fabric of claim 6, where the backing material is adapted to adhere to a rigid platform.
  • 9. The fabric of claim 6, where the short hook end is oriented towards the backing material.
  • 10. The fabric of claim 6, where the short hook end orients towards the epithelial surface under pressure.
  • 11. The fabric of claim 6, where the short hook end under pressure applies frictional forces to the epithelial surface to excoriate the histological tissue sample.
  • 12. The fabric of claim 6, where the backing material is adapted to be cut into uniform shapes.
  • 13. A method for removing and collecting a histological tissue sample from an epithelial surface comprising: receiving a fabric attached to a platform, where the fabric includes a backing material adapted to be adhered to the platform and a plurality of curved fenestrated loops attached to the backing material having a length and sufficient flexibility and rigidity to remove and collect the histological tissue sample from the epithelial surface, where each of the plurality of curved fenestrated loops includes a short hook end, where the length is between 3 mm and 25 mm, where a distance from the top of the plurality of curved fenestrated loops to the bottom of the short hook end is less than 20% of the length of the plurality of curved fenestrated loops, where the fabric includes a plurality of curved short arms, where each curved fenestrated loop of the plurality of curved fenestrated loops is formed from each cut of a plurality of cuts at a distal location from the backing material generating the short hook end, where each curved short arm of the plurality of curved short arms is formed from each cut of the plurality of cuts at the distal location, where each curved short arm of the plurality of curved short arms is adjacent to each curved fenestrated loop of the plurality of curved fenestrated loops, where the fenestrated loops do not fracture under minimal pressure, where under pressure when the fabric is pressed against the epithelial surface, the short hook end of the plurality of curved fenestrated loops separates from the curved short arms;contacting the fabric to the epithelial surface;applying pressure to the fabric in contact with the epithelial surface; androtating the platform clockwise and counterclockwise, where one or more short hook ends abrades the epithelial surface when rotated releasing the histological tissue sample, where the plurality of curved fenestrated loops and curved short arms collect the histological tissue sample.
  • 14. The method of claim 13, where the short hook end applies frictional forces to the epithelial surface to excoriate the histological tissue sample under pressure.
PRIORITY CLAIM

This application is a divisional of (1) U.S. Utility application Ser. No. 12/669,638 filed Jan. 19, 2010, which issued as U.S. Pat. No. 8,652,067 on Feb. 18, 2014 and claims priority to (1) through (2) pending U.S. Utility application Ser. No. 15/603,374 filed May 23, 2017 which is a divisional of (1) and claims priority to (1) through (3) U.S. Utility application Ser. No. 15/208,603 filed Jul. 12, 2016 which issued as U.S. Pat. No. 9,687,642 on Jun. 27, 2017 which is a continuation of (4) U.S. Utility application Ser. No. 14/602,002 filed Jan. 21, 2015 which issued as U.S. Pat. No. 9,393,394 on Jul. 19, 2016 and which is a divisional of (5) U.S. Utility application Ser. No. 14/154,447 filed Jan. 14, 2014, abandoned, and which is a divisional of and claims priority to (1) which is the National Phase of (6) Patent Cooperation Treaty Application US08/70341 filed Jul. 17, 2008 which claims priority to (7) U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/950,280 filed Jul. 17, 2007. These applications (1)-(7) are herein expressly incorporated by reference in their entireties and for all purposes.

US Referenced Citations (206)
Number Name Date Kind
1795500 Omundson Mar 1931 A
2675572 Nomiya Apr 1954 A
2701559 Cooper Feb 1955 A
2717437 De Mestral Sep 1955 A
2811969 Shubert Nov 1957 A
2839049 Maclean Jun 1958 A
2847005 Bourne Aug 1958 A
2955591 Maclean Oct 1960 A
3018498 Wasserman Jan 1962 A
3263681 Nechtow Aug 1966 A
3511242 Agnone May 1970 A
3554185 Kohl Jan 1971 A
3559226 Burns Feb 1971 A
3628522 Kato Dec 1971 A
3774590 McDonald Nov 1973 A
3777743 Binard Dec 1973 A
RE27915 Kohl Feb 1974 E
3796211 Kohl Mar 1974 A
3877464 Vermes Apr 1975 A
3945372 Milan Mar 1976 A
3995629 Patel Dec 1976 A
4016865 Fredericks Apr 1977 A
4061146 Baehr Dec 1977 A
4127113 Nollan Nov 1978 A
4168698 Ostergard Sep 1979 A
4227537 Suciu Oct 1980 A
4245653 Weaver Jan 1981 A
4384587 Milgrom May 1983 A
4396022 Marx Aug 1983 A
4430076 Harris Feb 1984 A
4465072 Taheri Aug 1984 A
4467816 Schluter Aug 1984 A
4620548 Hasselbrack Nov 1986 A
4641662 Jaicks Feb 1987 A
D289926 Lonky May 1987 S
4700713 Kist Oct 1987 A
4754764 Bayne Jul 1988 A
4757826 Abdulhay Jul 1988 A
4759376 Stormby Jul 1988 A
4762133 Bayne Aug 1988 A
4763669 Jaeger Aug 1988 A
4777947 Zwick Oct 1988 A
4781202 Janese Nov 1988 A
4872243 Fischer Oct 1989 A
4873992 Bayne Oct 1989 A
4892831 Wong Jan 1990 A
4932857 Nishino Jun 1990 A
4946389 Weissenberger Aug 1990 A
4951684 McMillan Aug 1990 A
4961430 Sheahon Oct 1990 A
4965725 Rutenberg Oct 1990 A
5022408 Mohajer Jun 1991 A
5067195 Sussman Nov 1991 A
5069224 Zinnanti, Jr. Dec 1991 A
5092345 Sakita Mar 1992 A
5133361 Cox Jul 1992 A
5154694 Kelman Oct 1992 A
5184626 Hicken Feb 1993 A
5191899 Strickland Mar 1993 A
5195964 Kletzky Mar 1993 A
5197949 Angsupanich Mar 1993 A
5250061 Michelson Oct 1993 A
5253652 Fast Oct 1993 A
5257182 Luck Oct 1993 A
5259391 Altshuler Nov 1993 A
5287272 Rutenberg Feb 1994 A
5315740 Provost May 1994 A
5329938 Lonky Jul 1994 A
5370128 Wainwright Dec 1994 A
5421346 Sanyal Jun 1995 A
5445164 Worthen Aug 1995 A
5456265 Yim Oct 1995 A
5462063 Kist Oct 1995 A
5464409 Mohajer Nov 1995 A
5470308 Edwards Nov 1995 A
5476104 Sheahon Dec 1995 A
5535756 Parasher Jul 1996 A
5544650 Boon Aug 1996 A
5549563 Kroner Aug 1996 A
5623941 Hedberg Apr 1997 A
5643307 Turkel Jul 1997 A
5649943 Amoils Jul 1997 A
5713369 Tao Feb 1998 A
5722423 Lind Mar 1998 A
5738109 Parasher Apr 1998 A
5761760 Dumler Jun 1998 A
5785785 Chesley Jul 1998 A
5792160 Weiss Aug 1998 A
5800362 Kobren Sep 1998 A
5807282 Fowler Sep 1998 A
5857982 Milliman Jan 1999 A
5865765 Mohajer Feb 1999 A
5868509 Crutcher Feb 1999 A
5868668 Weiss Feb 1999 A
5899850 Ouchi May 1999 A
5913857 Ritchart Jun 1999 A
5916228 Ripich Jun 1999 A
5937870 Gueret Aug 1999 A
5951550 Shirley Sep 1999 A
6053877 Banik Apr 2000 A
6110130 Kramer Aug 2000 A
6132421 Clapham Oct 2000 A
6193674 Zwart Feb 2001 B1
6258044 Lonky Jul 2001 B1
6297044 Eisen Oct 2001 B1
6336905 Colaianni Jan 2002 B1
6346086 Maksem Feb 2002 B1
6376905 Hisano Apr 2002 B2
6379315 Claren Apr 2002 B1
6387058 Wallach May 2002 B1
6394966 Gill May 2002 B1
6408492 Sparks Jun 2002 B1
6494845 Rutenberg Dec 2002 B2
6595947 Mikszta Jul 2003 B1
6676609 Rutenberg Jan 2004 B1
6730085 George May 2004 B2
6740049 Wallach May 2004 B2
6790654 Malinge Sep 2004 B2
6860738 Bachmann Mar 2005 B2
7004913 Rutenberg Feb 2006 B1
7137956 Nishtalas Nov 2006 B2
7156814 Williamson, IV Jan 2007 B1
7157233 Fischer Jan 2007 B2
7413551 Decker Aug 2008 B2
7517323 Ng Apr 2009 B2
D605407 Wagner Dec 2009 S
7749173 Larkin Jul 2010 B2
7836539 Moskovich Nov 2010 B2
7871574 Peltier Jan 2011 B2
8152739 McCully Apr 2012 B1
8348856 Malanowska Jan 2013 B1
8439847 Larkin May 2013 B2
8517956 Malanowska Aug 2013 B1
8617183 Schneider Dec 2013 B2
8652067 Lonky Feb 2014 B2
8795197 Lonky Aug 2014 B2
9028484 Craig May 2015 B2
9044213 Lonky Jun 2015 B1
9282950 Klein Mar 2016 B2
9282951 Lonky Mar 2016 B2
9393394 Lonky Jul 2016 B2
9421346 Callahan Aug 2016 B2
9687642 Lonky Jun 2017 B2
9895140 Lonky Feb 2018 B1
10201332 Lonky Feb 2019 B1
10258780 Lonky Apr 2019 B2
20010022063 Korteweg Sep 2001 A1
20020068881 Kobren Jun 2002 A1
20020165467 Rutenberg Nov 2002 A1
20030055373 Sramek Mar 2003 A1
20030109804 Auerbach Jun 2003 A1
20040029658 Howe Feb 2004 A1
20040120989 Vadas Apr 2004 A1
20040116827 Tiberio Jun 2004 A1
20040138642 Fischer Jul 2004 A1
20040181170 Wallach Sep 2004 A1
20040181185 Lee Sep 2004 A1
20040220478 Wallace Nov 2004 A1
20040236247 Rizvi Nov 2004 A1
20040260199 Hardia Dec 2004 A1
20040260201 Mueller Dec 2004 A1
20040267191 Gifford Dec 2004 A1
20050059905 Boock Mar 2005 A1
20050074269 Asselin Apr 2005 A1
20050085845 Hilaire Apr 2005 A1
20050215920 Isa Sep 2005 A1
20050251093 Abou-Kansoul Nov 2005 A1
20050261603 Witenberg Nov 2005 A1
20060052805 Cwik Mar 2006 A1
20060122641 Eberle Jun 2006 A1
20060200043 Jannetty Sep 2006 A1
20070060839 Richardson Mar 2007 A1
20070093727 Feuer Apr 2007 A1
20070135731 Ward Apr 2007 A1
20070100335 Fischer May 2007 A1
20070107155 Kacher May 2007 A1
20070118947 Lorenzo May 2007 A1
20070161042 Zuk Jul 2007 A1
20070270715 Ng Nov 2007 A1
20070282222 Larkin Dec 2007 A1
20070282223 Larkin Dec 2007 A1
20080188769 Lu Aug 2008 A1
20080216763 Ebert Sep 2008 A1
20080262384 Wiederkehr Oct 2008 A1
20090012424 Huschmand Jan 2009 A1
20090024155 Lee Jan 2009 A1
20090043224 Lundkvist Feb 2009 A1
20090112239 To Apr 2009 A1
20090149860 Scribner Jun 2009 A1
20090275859 Kim Nov 2009 A1
20090326414 Peltier Dec 2009 A1
20100011483 Pinkart Jan 2010 A1
20100210968 Lonky Aug 2010 A1
20100249649 Larkin Sep 2010 A1
20110152881 Conner Jun 2011 A1
20110172557 Lonky Jul 2011 A1
20110268610 Recknor Nov 2011 A1
20130066233 Klein Mar 2013 A1
20130267870 Lonky Oct 2013 A1
20140128773 Lonky May 2014 A1
20140358158 Einarsson Dec 2014 A1
20160100862 Parys Apr 2016 A1
20170021151 Lonky Jan 2017 A1
20170112477 Benning Apr 2017 A1
20180035983 Lonky Feb 2018 A1
20180296800 Kato et al. Oct 2018 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (8)
Number Date Country
392411 May 1988 AT
653880 Jan 1986 CH
2166965 Jul 2008 EP
WO2005084555 Sep 2005 WO
WO2007101994 Sep 2007 WO
WO2009012392 Jan 2009 WO
WO2012125757 Sep 2012 WO
WO2015134568 Sep 2015 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (47)
Entry
Blute, Renal brush biopsy: Survey of indications, techniques and results, J Urol., Aug. 1981, vol. 126(2), pp. 146-149.
Boon et al., “Confocal Sectioning of Thick, Otherwise Undiagnosable Cell Groupings in Cervical Smears” Acta Cytol., vol. 37, pp. 40-48 (1991).
Boon et al., “Exploiting the “Toothpick Effect” of the Cytobrush by Plastic Embedding of Cervical Samples” Acta Cytol., vol. 35, pp. 57-63 (1991).
Boon, “A model for quantitative follow-up studies of cervical lesions,” Diagn Cytopathol., 1992, vol. 8(1), pp. 8-17.
Butler, B., “Kuper brush in the diagnosis of endometrial lesions,” The Lancet, Dec. 1971, vol. 298(7739), pp. 1390-1392.
DeGirolami, “Histo-brush technic for endometerial tissue study,” Obstet Gynecol., Dec. 1961, vol. 28(6), pp. 861-866.
Dowlatshahi et al., “Evaluation of brush cytology as an independent technique for detection of esophageal carcinoma” J Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, vol. 89, No. 6, pp. 848-851, Jun. 1985.
Fennessy, “Transbronchial biopsy of peripheral lung lesions,” Radiology, May 1967, vol. 88(5), pp. 878-882.
Firestone, “Needle lung biopsy, bronchial brushing and mediastinoscopy in Management of Chest Diseases,” Calif Med., Sep. 1973, vol. 119(3), pp. 1-5.
Gahres et al., “Histo-brush technic for Endometrial Tissue Study”, Obstet Gynecol vol. 28, pp. 861-866 (1966)—Front Page Only.
Goldstein, “Esophageal biopsy utilizing a flexible brush,” Gastrointest Endosc., Aug. 1968, vol. 15(1), pp. 53-55.
Granqvist, “Colonoscopic biopsies and cytological exam in chronic ulcerative colitis,” J Gastroenterology, Apr. 1980, vol. 15(3), pp. 283-288.
Hardwick, “Brush biopsy in the diagnosia of neoplasia in Bartlett's esophagus,” Disease Esophagus, Oct. 1997, vol. 10(4), pp. 233-237.
Iaccarino, “Percutaneous intralesional brushing of cystic lesions of bone: a technical improvement of diagnostic cytology,” Skelatal Radiol, 1990, vol. 19(3), pp. 187-190.
Johnsson, “Cytological brush techniques in malignant disease of the endometrium,” Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, Jan. 1968, vol. 47, issue 1, pp. 38-51.
Johnsson, “Cytological diagnosis of endometrial disorders with a brush technique,” Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand., 1971, vol. 50(2), pp. 141-148.
Kovnat, “Bronchial brushing through the flexible fiberoptic bronchoscope in the diagnosis of peripheral pulmonary lesions,” Chest, Feb. 1975, vol. 67(2), pp. 179-184.
Liu, “Transcervical chorionic villus biopsy with a brush,” Prenat Diagn., Sep.-Oct. 1985, vol. 5(5), pp. 349-355.
Maksem, “Endometrial brush cytology of advanced postmenopausal endometrium . . . ” Diagn Cytopathol., Nov. 1998, vol. 19(5), pp. 338-343.
Matsuda, “Bronchial brushing and bronchial biopsy: comparison of diagnostic accuracy and cell typing reliability in lung cancer,” Thorax, Jun. 1986, vol. 41(6), pp. 475-479.
Meulman, “Predictions of various grades of cervical neoplasia on plastic-embedded cytobrush samples,” Anal Quant Cytol Histol., Feb. 1992, vol. 14(1), pp. 60-72.
Mills, “Transcatheter brush biopsy of intravenous tumor thrombi,” Radiology, Jun. 1978, vol. 127(3), pp. 667-670.
Morteza, “Brush and forceps biopsy of biliary ducts via percutaneous transhepatic catheterization,” Radiology, Jun. 1980, vol. 135, pp. 777-778.
Moskowitz, “To brush or not to brush is there really a question?,” Chest, Jun. 1971, vol. 59(6), pp. 648-650.
Mullins, “A new technique for transbronchial biopsy in infants and small children,” Pediatr Pulmonol, Oct. 1995, vol. 20(4), pp. 253-257.
Payne, “Diagnostic accuracy of cytology and biopsy in primary bronchial carcinoma,” Thorax, Jun. 1979, vol. 43(3), pp. 294-299.
Pipkorn, “A brush to harvest cells from the nasal mucosa for microscopic and biochemical analysis,” J Immunol Methods, Aug. 9, 1988, vol. 112(1), pp. 37-42.
Portner, “New devices for biliary drainage and biopsy,” Radiology, Jun. 1982, vol. 138, pp. 1191-1195.
Raney, “Detection of carcinoma of upper urinary tract with steerable brush biopsy,” Urology, Jul. 1979, vol. 14(1), pp. 77-78.
Ravinsky, “Cytologic features of primary adenoid cystic carcinoma of the uterine cervix. A case report,” Acta Cytol., Nov.-Dec. 1996, vol. 40(6), pp. 1304-1308.
Riise et al., “Bronchial brush biopsies for studies of epithelial inflammation in stable asthma and nonobstructive chronic bronchitis” Eur Respir J vol. 9, pp. 1665-1671 (1996).
Riise, “A bronchoscopic brush biopsy study of large airway mucosal pathology in smokers . . . ” Eur Respir J., Apr. 1992, vol. 5(4), pp. 382-386.
Roth et al., “Cytologic Detection of Esophageal Squamous Cell . . . ” Cancer, vol. 80, No. 11, Dec. 1, 1997.
Sanderson, “Use of a new controllable-tip brush with the flexible fiber bronchoscope,” Chest, Jun. 1974, vol. 65(6), pp. 620-621.
Sheline, “Fluoroscopically guided retrograde brush biopsy in the diagnosis of transitional cell carcinoma of the upper urinary tract . . . ” Am J Roentgenology, Sep. 1989, vol. 153(2), pp. 313-316.
Willson, “Bronchial brush biopsy with a controllable brush,” Am J Roentgenology, Jul. 1970, vol. 109(3), pp. 471-477.
Zavala, “Use of Bronchofiberscope for bronchial brush biopsy: diagnostic results and comparison with other brushing techniques,” Chest, Jun. 1973, vol. 63(6), pp. 889-892.
Zeppa, “A model for quantitative follow-up studies of cervical lesions,” Diagn Cytopathol, 1992, vol. 8(1), pp. 8-17.
ISR of Application No. 08796246, PCT/US2008/70341 published as WO2009012392 dated Oct. 22, 2008, 6 pages.
Extended ESR of Application No. 08796246, PCT/US2008/070341, May 11, 2012, 6 pages.
Australian Patent Exam Report 20130806, dated Aug. 6, 2013, 5 pages.
Communication under Article 94 of U.S. Appl. No. 08/796,246, PCT/US2008/070341, dated Jun. 8, 2015, 5 pages.
Article 94(3) European Communication, Application No. 08796246, PCT/US2008/070341, dated Jul. 4, 2016, 4 pages.
International Search Report of PCT/US17/14190, published as WO2017/132051, dated Apr. 10, 2017, 13 pages.
Parasher V.K. and Huibregtse, K., Endoscopic retrograde wire-guided cytology of malignant biliary strictures using a novel scraping brush, Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, (1998) 48 (3) 288-290.
Extended ESR of Application No. 17744713.3, PCT/US2017/014190, Aug. 19, 2019, 7 pages.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability of PCT/US17/14190, published as WO2017/132051, dated Jul. 31, 2018, 7 pages.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20190224463 A1 Jul 2019 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
60950280 Jul 2007 US
Divisions (4)
Number Date Country
Parent 15603374 May 2017 US
Child 16371027 US
Parent 15208603 Jul 2016 US
Child 15603374 US
Parent 14154447 Jan 2014 US
Child 14602002 US
Parent 12669638 US
Child 14154447 US
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 14602002 Jan 2015 US
Child 15208603 US