This application claims priority to European Patent Application No. 21382999.7, filed Nov. 4, 2021, and all the benefits accruing therefrom under 35 U.S.C. § 119, the contents of which in its entirety are herein incorporated by reference.
The present disclosure relates to frictionless electronic safety actuators for use in an elevator system.
It is known in the art to mount safety brakes onto elevator components moving along guide rails, to bring the elevator component quickly and safely to a stop, especially in an emergency. In many elevator systems the elevator car is hoisted by a tension member with its movement being guided by a pair of guide rails. Typically, a governor is used to monitor the speed of the elevator car. According to standard safety regulations, such elevator systems must include an emergency braking device (known as a safety brake, “safety gear” or “safety”) which is capable of stopping the elevator car from moving downwards, even if the tension member breaks, by gripping a guide rail. Safety brakes may also be installed on the counterweight or other components moving along guide rails.
Electronic Safety Actuators (ESA's) are now commonly used instead of just using mechanical governors to trigger a safety brake. ESA's typically activate a safety brake by dragging a magnet (either a permanent magnet or an electromagnet) against the guide rail, and using the friction to pull up on a linkage attached to the safety brake. The reliance on the friction interaction between a magnet and the guide rail has a number of problems, especially in high-rise elevator systems, as the interaction between the magnet and the guide rail causes wear on the guide rail, and can induce chipping, as well as debris accumulation. Any degradation of guide rail condition is of concern as it affects the safety of the whole elevator system.
There is therefore a need to improve electronic safety actuation of the safety brakes.
According to a first aspect of this disclosure there is provided a frictionless electronic safety actuator for use in an elevator system, comprising: at least one electromagnet and a magnetic plate attached to a connection arrangement; wherein the connection arrangement is configured to connect the magnetic plate to a linkage that is actuatable so as to move a safety brake into frictional engagement with an elevator guide rail; and wherein the at least one electromagnet is operable to selectively produce a magnetic force which acts upon the magnetic plate to displace the magnetic plate and thereby move the connection arrangement to actuate the linkage without the magnetic plate coming into frictional engagement with the elevator guide rail.
It will be appreciated that, according to the present disclosure, the frictionless electronic safety actuator provides actuation for a safety brake, without the aid of frictional contact between the electronic safety actuator and the guide rail. This provides the advantage that actuation of the safety brake is not affected by the state of the elevator guide rail, so no debris from the elevator hoistway or dirt from the elevator guide rail can interfere with the actuation of the frictionless electronic safety actuator.
It will furthermore be appreciated that the location of the frictionless electronic safety actuator is no longer restricted by the need for contact with the guide rail, and can be positioned anywhere on an elevator component where the linkage can then actuate the safety brake. Therefore, in some examples no component of the frictionless electronic safety actuator comes into frictional contact with the elevator guide rail.
It will be understood by the skilled person that the connection arrangement can be any form of connection between the magnetic plate and the linkage, and whilst certain examples of types of connection arrangement are disclosed herein, these are by way of example only. The movement of the linkage can be a vertical movement aimed to push or pull the safety brake into engagement with the elevator rail. In other examples the movement of the linkage can be in any direction so as to move the safety brake into a position of engagement with the elevator guide rail.
According to a first set of examples, the connection arrangement is configured translate a horizontal displacement of the magnetic plate to a vertical movement of the linkage. The connection arrangement may be in the form of a scissor mechanism which translates a horizontal movement of the magnetic plate to a vertical movement of the linkage. Such an arrangement can be advantageous in places where there is limited vertical space for placing the frictionless electronic safety actuator relative to a safety brake.
In some examples of the first set of examples, the connection arrangement includes a compression spring arrangement configured to translate a horizontal displacement of the magnetic plate to a vertical movement of the linkage; wherein the compression spring arrangement generates a spring bias to return to a relaxed state which actuates a vertical movement of the linkage to move a safety brake into frictional engagement with an elevator guide rail. The use of a compression spring arrangement means a bias can be introduced, where the spring biases the magnetic plate into a position where the linkage actuates the safety brake when the connection arrangement is free to move. This can be due to the removal of a magnetic force which the electromagnet can selectively operate to keep the magnetic plate in a position where the linkage is not actuated i.e. a normal operating position. When the magnetic field is removed or reversed the magnetic plate can be pulled by the bias of the compression spring arrangement into a position which actuates the linkage. In some examples the compression spring arrangement comprises at least one leaf spring. In some examples the compression spring arrangement comprises a buckling spring.
In some examples of the first set of examples, the connection arrangement includes a plurality of leaf springs connected in series to form a concertina in a vertical direction with one end fixed and one end movable in vertical direction; and a linkage connection point located on the movable end of the concertina. Optionally the plurality of leaf springs can have a relaxed state which biases towards a position which actuates the linkage, and during normal operation the magnetic force between the at least one electromagnet and the magnetic plate can pull the plurality of leaf springs against their bias in a horizontal direction. Optionally the plurality of leaf springs comprise thin metal sheet plates. Such leaf springs may be able to deform easily without exceeding their yield strength but being able to provide adequate spring bias force and displacement distance. It will be appreciated that the use of a plurality of leaf springs allows for a small horizontal deflection to be translated into a larger vertical deflection, which can provide a large actuation distance for the linkage.
In some examples of the first set of examples, of the first set of examples, the vertical movement of the plurality of leaf springs is guided so a first side of the plurality of leaf springs is fixed in the horizontal direction and guided in the vertical direction, and a second side of the plurality of leaf springs is guided in the vertical direction and movable in the horizontal direction; and wherein the second side of the plurality of leaf springs is attached to the magnetic plate, and horizontal movement is determined by the operation of the at least one electromagnet. This fixation helps to prevent losses in vertical movement due to an unbalanced spring, thereby increasing the transfer efficiency of the spring force from the horizontal direction to the vertical direction.
In some examples of the first set of examples, the at least one electromagnet is operable to remove or reverse the magnetic field in order to displace the magnetic plate. It will be appreciated that this can mean a triggering of the frictionless electronic safety actuator. The plurality of leaf springs can be allowed to return to their relaxed state, by reducing the horizontal deflection, wherein the reduction in horizontal direction is translated to a movement in the vertical direction so as to actuate the linkage. This triggered state being the natural state of the springs (either a plurality of leaf spring or any other form of compression spring), has the advantage of making the movement to the triggered position as efficient as possible. In addition, it will be appreciated that this can introduce a failsafe, as if the at least one electromagnet were to lose power the frictionless electronic safety actuator can automatically trigger the safety brakes.
In some examples of the first set of examples, the magnetic plate comprises at least one permanent magnet. By using at least one permanent magnet it will be appreciated that the power requirement for the frictionless electronic safety actuator can be greatly reduced, as continuous power is not required to stop the actuation of the linkage, instead only a small amount of power is required for the release of the magnetic plate. Optionally the attractive magnetic force between the permanent magnet and the electromagnet when no current is running through the electromagnet is greater than the spring force of the plurality of leaf springs.
In the examples where the magnetic plate comprises at least one permanent magnet, the arrangement is similar to that of many traditional ESA systems (albeit with actuation now taking place in a frictionless way). This means that existing ESA layouts can be retained. It will be appreciated that the operation of the at least one electromagnet may also be similar to that of many traditional ESA systems and so may allow for an easy upgrade to a frictionless ESA as disclosed herein.
In some examples of the first set of examples, the at least one electromagnet is operable to produce a magnetic field to repel the magnetic plate. It will be appreciated that when the magnetic plate additionally comprises at least one permanent magnet a magnetic field is required to move the magnetic plate from the normal operating position into a triggered position. This can be aided by the spring bias of the compression spring arrangement, so as to efficiently actuate the linkage.
In some examples of the first set of examples, the at least one electromagnet is operable to produce a magnetic field to reset the magnetic plate; wherein the magnetic plate is moved in the horizontal direction against the bias of the compression spring arrangement. It will be appreciated that such a movement can move the magnetic plate from a triggered position back to the normal operating position. Optionally, the magnetic plate can be kept in place by the magnetic force of the at least one electromagnet, during normal operation.
In the first set of examples the connection arrangement is arranged to translate a horizontal movement of the magnetic plate to a vertical movement of the linkage. Advantageously a small horizontal movement can be translated into a larger vertical movement for the actuation of the linkage. Some configurations of elevator components and their safety brakes may have space constraints which this first example of frictionless electronic safety actuator is more suited to. There are however various alternative connection arrangements which are suitable for use in the frictionless electronic safety actuator. A second set of examples of an implementation of the frictionless electronic safety actuator are hereby given.
According to a second set of examples the at least one electromagnet is configured to move the magnetic plate and its attached connection arrangement in a vertical direction to directly displace the linkage in the vertical direction. It will be appreciated that an arrangement such as this can actuate the linkage and activate a safety brake in an uncomplicated way. In this second set of examples the connection arrangement can be relatively simple, with fewer parts which may be causes of error.
In some examples of the second set of examples, a single electromagnet is configured to move the magnetic plate in a vertical direction to vertically displace the linkage.
In some examples of the second set of examples, a pair of electromagnets are positioned vertically displaced so as to selectively produce magnetic forces to displace the magnetic plate vertically between the two electromagnets so as to actuate the linkage.
It will be appreciated, that an electromagnet may be configured to push the magnetic plate upwards in a vertical direction to vertically displace the linkage, and/or an electromagnet may be configured to push the magnetic plate upwards in a vertical direction to vertically displace the linkage. It will also be appreciated that the use of a pair of magnets used to displace the magnetic plate between them will require smaller electromagnets, and may require less power than a single electromagnet. The combination of magnetic fields produced by a pair of electromagnets can be more easily tuned to control the movement of the magnetic plate, and allow for more efficient actuation of the linkage.
In some examples of the second set of examples, the magnetic plate is displaced towards a stop, wherein the stop is resiliently mounted. A resilient mounting of the stop can allow for over-travel in the displacement of the magnetic plate, which can allow for larger tolerances in the connection of the linkage to the safety brake, where variable actuation distances can be absorbed. The stop can be a magnetic plate, or a permanent magnet, or an electromagnet.
In some examples of the second set of examples, the resilient mounting of the stop is arranged to relax to assist with reset of the magnetic plate. Optionally, the resilient mounting can be a spring.
In some examples of the second set of examples, the at least one electromagnet is operable to produce a magnetic field to displace the magnetic plate upwards in the vertical direction, i.e. to actuate the linkage. It will be appreciated that the displacement of the magnetic plate can be caused by various combinations of magnetic fields, depending on the number of electromagnets used in the frictionless electronic safety actuator. Where a single electromagnet is used at the bottom a repulsive magnetic field can be produced to repel the magnetic plate upwards. Where a single electromagnet is used at the top an attractive magnetic field can be produced to attract the magnetic plate upwards. Where a pair of electromagnets are used a combination of fields can be produced to produce the upwards movement.
In some examples of the second set of examples, the at least one electromagnet is operable to remove or reverse the magnetic field to displace the magnetic plate. It will be appreciated that the magnetic plate can fall back down to the normal operating position under the force of gravity. This means the reset of the frictionless electronic safety actuator is easily performed without external influence. The magnetic plate can be actively displaced downwards by the operation of the at least one electromagnet, which aids the natural movement of the magnetic plate with gravity.
In some examples of the second set of examples, the magnetic plate is a permanent magnet. A permanent magnet can create a larger magnetic field, an easier interaction between the magnetic plate and the at least one electromagnet. As such less power may be required for the at least one electromagnet to move the magnetic plate into the triggered position.
Certain preferred examples of this disclosure will now be described, by way of example only, with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
In the elevator system 10 shown in
It will be appreciated that, whilst a roped elevator is described here, the examples of an electronic safety actuator described here will work equally well with a ropeless elevator system e.g. hydraulic systems and systems with linear motors.
Whilst mechanical speed governor systems are still in use in many elevator systems, others are now implementing electronically actuated systems to trigger the emergency safety brakes 24. Most of these electronically actuated systems utilize use friction between a magnet and the guide rail 20 to then mechanically actuate a linkage to engage the safety brakes 24. Examples of an electronic safety actuator are disclosed herein which do not utilize friction against the guide rail 20 to actuate the safety brakes 24.
In the example shown in
The plurality of leaf springs 130 are designed to deform easily without exceeding their yield strength, whilst still being able to provide the required actuation distance and a spring force capable of actuating the linkage 80. In some examples the plurality of leaf springs 130 comprise thin metal sheet plates. Various alternative compression spring arrangements may be contemplated, such as a buckling spring instead of the concertina of leaf springs. In some examples a single leaf spring may be used.
The at least one electromagnet 110 is positioned relative to the magnetic plate 120 such that, when the at least one electromagnet 110 is operated, the produced magnetic field acts on the magnetic plate 120. In the example of
In this example the electromagnet 110 produces an attractive force upon the magnetic plate 120 whilst the elevator is in normal operation (
In some examples the at least one electromagnet 110 is operated to actively repel the magnetic plate 120, providing additional force to the force of the plurality of leaf springs 130 to return to their relaxed state. This can speed up the process of actuating the safety brake 24.
To reset the frictionless electronic safety actuator 100 the at least one electromagnet 110 is operated to produce a magnetic force to displace the magnetic plate 120 horizontally back to its original position, against the bias of the concertina 135 of the plurality of leaf springs 130.
In the example shown in
In the example shown in
In the example of
In an example the first magnetic plate 210 is an electromagnet. In another example the stop 212 is an electromagnet. In another example both the first magnetic plate 210 and the stop 212 are electromagnets. The electromagnet(s) may take any suitable form e.g. a straight core with a single coil or more than one coil. The electromagnet(s) 210, 212 are positioned so as to act upon the second magnetic plate 220, and move the second magnetic plate 220 from a rest position during normal operation as seen in
Whilst in some examples the stop 212 is an electromagnet, it can be any form of physical stop. In some examples the stop 212 is a permanent magnet. In some examples the stop is resiliently mounted, preferably so that the resilient mounting can assist with the reset of the magnetic plate. In the example shown in
In the example shown in
When the frictionless electronic safety actuator 200 activates, the electromagnet(s) are operable to produce a force which moves the second magnetic plate 220, from its resting position as shown in
The use of the spring 230 allows for a shortened distance between the first magnetic plate 210 and stop 212, with space for large actuation distances to be absorbed by the compression of the spring 230, when the second magnetic plate 220 is pushed upwards by the electromagnet of the first magnetic plate 210. The spring 230 can also absorb some of the force of the movement of the second magnetic plate 220, preventing damage of the stop 212 and the second magnetic plate 220. It also aids with reset. Whilst a spring 230 is discussed with reference to this example, it will be appreciated by a person skilled in the art that various types of resilient mountings may be suitable.
In the example, where both the first magnetic plate 210 and the stop 212 are electromagnets, the first magnetic plate 210 can be operated to repel the magnetic plate 220, and the stop 212 can be operated to attract the magnetic plate 220, increasing the efficiency of the actuation of the safety brake 24. In this example each electromagnet requires less power than a single electromagnet would require.
In the situation where the first magnetic plate 210 is an electromagnet, the stop 212 can be a permanent magnet, configured to attract the second magnetic plate 220. The magnetic attraction between the second magnetic plate 220 and the stop 212 can help prevent the second magnetic plate 220 from shifting downwards with a pull from the safety brake 24, when the safety brake 24 exerts a frictional force against the guide rail 20.
In some examples no power is needed during normal operation, as the second magnetic plate 220 is kept in place by its own weight. Advantages for this include improved energy efficiency. In an additional example, the natural magnetic force between the first magnetic plate 210 and the second magnetic plate 220 provide additional force to keep the second magnetic plate 220 in place, even when the electromagnet of the first magnetic plate 210 is not powered.
In an example, the electromagnet of the first magnetic plate 210 can be operable to produce a magnetic field to keep the second magnetic plate 220 in place during normal operation. This prevents any abnormal movement of the elevator car 16 from moving the second magnetic plate 220 in a way which could accidentally trigger the safety brake 24.
In the examples shown in
The frictionless electronic safety actuator 100, 200 is fixed to the elevator car 16 and is positioned relative to the safety brake 24 such that the linkage can actuate the safety brake 24. The frictionless electronic safety actuator 100, 200 is positioned to make no direct contact with the elevator rail 20.
It will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that many forms of linkage 80 between the frictionless electronic safety actuator 100, 200 and the safety brake 24 would be suitable for actuating the safety brake 24 based on the movement of the frictionless electronic safety actuator 100, 200. Additionally a variety of types of safety brakes 24 are suitable for actuation by a linkage 80 in this manner, e.g. a safety brake 24 using a wedge or a roller. In the examples shown the safety brake 24 is positioned below the frictionless electronic safety actuator 100, 200, however it will be appreciated that other configurations would also be possible, for example, the frictionless electronic safety actuator 100, 200 may even be positioned to one side of or below the safety brake 24, e.g. depending on the linkage used.
The above described examples have a number of advantages over traditional electronic safety actuators. The actuation of the safety brake has no dependence on guide rail 16 condition, or the speed of the elevator car. Additionally the response time to braking will be improved as actuation is not dependent on a friction force between the electronic safety actuator and the guide rail 20. Movement of the car will also not affect the actuation of the safety brakes, as the actuation of the safety brakes is fully independent of any interaction between the elevator car 16 and the guide rails 20. This can improve the safety of the whole elevator system. The frictionless electronic safety actuator may also have the advantage of not damaging the guide rail.
It will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that the disclosure has been illustrated by describing one or more specific aspects thereof, but is not limited to these aspects; many variations and modifications are possible, within the scope of the accompanying claims.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
21382999 | Nov 2021 | EP | regional |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
20070051563 | Oh et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1733992 | Dec 2006 | EP |
3519339 | Aug 2019 | EP |
3604196 | Feb 2020 | EP |
3819250 | May 2021 | EP |
2887940 | Dec 2021 | ES |
2022551320 | Dec 2022 | JP |
WO-2008057116 | May 2008 | WO |
WO-2020187757 | Sep 2020 | WO |
Entry |
---|
European Search Report for application EP 21382999.7, dated May 24, 2022, 59 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20230139867 A1 | May 2023 | US |