Patent Grant
8596846
The present invention relates to a frontlight unit for reflective displays and is aimed at improving brightness of illumination and efficiency of light-source energy consumption. The invention may find use in displays of mobile devices having poor illumination conditions such as laptop computers, cell phones, iPads or tablets, so-called electronic paper, electronic calculators, electronic labels, or the like.
A frontlight unit is a means for illuminating a display assembly, such as a liquid crystal display (LCD), an interferometric modulation display (IMOD), or a display that is viewed in ambient light. A provision of the frontlight unit improves performance of the display in poor lighting conditions. Frontlights are inferior to backlights and are usually used as an auxiliary feature.
Generally, a display presents an image by absorbing some of the light passing through. When an electrical field is applied across the crystal, e.g., in an LCD, the electrical field changes the passing light so that light does not pass through a polarization filter. When the electrical field is absent, the polarization filter passes predetermined wavelength components of white light. The remaining portion of white light is absorbed. For example, in an RGB image obtained from white light, approximately two-thirds of the light energy is lost and does not participate in the image-formation process. The aforementioned absorbed light is produced by a power source, e.g., a battery-operated device. If it were possible to obviate the losses of light energy associated with the absorption of the light components that do not participate in the image-formation process, it would be possible to significantly improve power-source efficiency, i.e., to prolong the service life of the light source, such as a battery.
A nonilluminated display may be lit from the front. To use ambient light in an LCD, the liquid crystal, itself, is sandwiched between a polarization filter and a reflective surface, i.e., a mirror. The mirror causes the display to be opaque so that the display cannot be illuminated from the back. In order to improve the brightness and contrast of the image reproduced by a reflective display, it is desirable to enhance illumination with an additional artificial source of frontlight.
Frontlight systems for reflective displays are relatively new devices, and the concept of frontlight display is also relatively new. Nevertheless, many patents and patent applications are already dedicated to the structure and use of frontlight devices (see, e.g., U.S. Pat. No. 6,650,382 issued on Nov. 18, 2003 [inventors: Sumida, et al]; U. S. Pat. No. 6,657,683 issued on Dec. 2, 2003 [Inventor: Richard]; U.S. Pat. No. 7,603,001 issued on Oct. 13, 2009 to Wang, et al; U.S. Pat. No. 7,502,081 issued on Mar. 10, 2009 to Umemoto, et al; U.S. Pat. No. 7,733,439 issued on Jun. 8, 2010 to Sampsell, et al; U.S. Pat. No. 7,777,954 issued on Aug. 17, 2010 to Gruhlke, et al; U.S. Pat. No. 7,855,827 issued on Dec. 21, 2010 to Xu, et al; U.S. Pat. No. 7,813,026 issued on Oct. 12, 2010 to Sampsell; U.S. Pat. No. 7,864,395 issued on Jan. 4, 2011 to Chui; U.S. Pat. No. 8,009,244 issued on Aug. 30, 2011 to Toriyama, et al; U.S. Pat. No. 7,944,524 issued on May 17, 2011 to Akiyama, et al; and U.S. Pat. No. 7,949,213 issued on May 24, 2011 to Mienko, et al).
Various methods for delivery of frontlight are known in the art. Most often, a light source is placed around the perimeter of an LCD. Other systems use backlight, which is redirected to the display edges and which then propagates through the space between the display, itself, and the front protective layer. There exists a great variety of improvements to both of these concepts, such as preventing exit of propagated light from the aforementioned space, or similar methods aimed at providing full reflection of light in said space. Other methods and means are aimed at improving efficiency of frontlight-separation, e.g., improving input of light from display edges, etc.
Common drawbacks of existing frontlight display illumination systems are inefficient use of light source, insufficient brightness and contrast, and complexity of structure.
Implementation of the holographic technique for frontlight display illumination is also known in the art. U.S. Pat. No. 7,845,841 issued on Dec. 7, 2010 to J. Sampsell discloses a frontlight display illuminator that uses holograms embedded in a waveguide plate of a special configuration.
U.S. Pat. No. 7,859,731 issued on Dec. 28, 2010 to Jin-Seung Choi discloses an illumination apparatus and method for a display device designed such that light is incident on a hologram or hologram pattern at an angle for which diffraction efficiency is the highest. The illumination apparatus includes at least one point of light source that emits light and a light guide plate (LGP) that has at least one point of light source disposed on a side thereof and a hologram pattern on the top surface that permits the light incident from the point of light source to exit from the top surface. The side of the LGP facing the point of light source is inclined such that the light is incident obliquely on the hologram pattern at an altitude angle that provides high diffraction efficiency.
The use of lasers for backlighting is known. For example, U.S. Pat. No. 7,508,466 issued on May 24, 2009 to Hutchins discloses an LCD display that includes a planar array of transmissive LCD devices and at least one laser diode device spaced apart from the planar array of LCD devices. At least one laser diode device is configured to illuminate at least a subset of LCD devices of the planar array of LCD devices so that in operation the laser diode device provides backlighting for the subset of LCD devices.
US Patent Application Publication No. 20110026270 published on Feb. 3, 2011 (inventor: Onishi) discloses a surface light-source device from which a large planar light with uniform light intensity distribution can be obtained from a spot-like laser light. The surface light-source device comprises a laser light source for emitting laser light, an optical system including one or more reflective diffusion members, and an optical waveguide combined with the optical system for converting reflected and diffused laser light into the planar light and emitting it from a principal plane. The reflective diffusion member converts the laser light emitted from the laser light source into a linear light having an arcuate radiation pattern.
US Patent Application Publication No. 20080259247 (published on Oct. 23, 2008, inventor: C. Stuart, et al) discloses a display, such as an LCD panel, that is illuminated using frequency-doubled vertical extended-cavity surface-emitting lasers (VECSELs) as efficient light sources. Visible light from VECSELs is directed to an illuminating panel using optical fibers and/or optical gratings to provide substantially uniform illumination of the illuminating panel. Visible light from the illuminating panel, which can be provided at a particular number of primary wavelengths by the VECSELs, is then used to illuminate the display.
A laser light source supplied by special optics for use in planar lighting devices as a backlight device is also known in the art. U.S. Pat. No. 7,859,610 granted on Dec. 28, 2010 to T. Mizushima describes a laser system that can be used for RGB laser light illumination in display assemblies.
Further development of front illumination systems with improved efficiency of lighting is disclosed in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/373,434 filed by the same applicants as the applicants of the present application on Nov. 14, 2011. The system comprises a frontlight unit that is intended to enhance illumination of a reflective display having pixels arranged in a matrix pattern and using monochromatic laser lights as light sources. The unit contains a network of light-distribution planar ridge waveguides with holograms arranged in a matrix pattern that corresponds to the matrix pattern of the reflective display when the frontlight unit is interposed onto the reflective display. The unit emits light in the downward direction in the form of diverging beams that fall onto the pixels of the reflective display and in the upward direction onto mirrors from which light is reflected also in the form of diverging beams onto the reflective display. However, the reflective mirrors occupy up to 10% of the surface area of the display, thus blocking a portion of image-carrying light.
The present invention relates to frontlight units for reflective displays having pixels arranged in a matrix pattern and is aimed at improving image quality, i.e., image brightness and contrast. Such displays are used, e.g., in electronic calculators, electronic labels, so-called electronic paper, or the like, and are also aimed at improving efficiency of light-source energy consumption.
The frontlight illumination system of the invention for a reflective display has a layered structure that comprises a rectangular transparent substrate, the surface of which is covered with a net of planar ridge waveguides. This net is used to deliver specific monochromatic laser lights, e.g., red, green, and blue, to specific points on the substrate.
Structurally, each planar ridge waveguide comprises a core embedded into the cladding layer or placed onto the top surface of the cladding. The core and cladding are made from transparent optical materials that have different coefficients of refraction. Both can be made from the same materials if the materials have different coefficients of refraction. For example, the materials can be a pair of silicon oxide SiO2, a pair of silicon nitride Si3N4, or their combinations, etc. If necessary, the upper cladding may be coated with a transparent protective film.
The system also contains laser light sources, e.g., red, green, and blue, which deliver light to the aforementioned net through a light-separating planar ridge waveguide located at least on one side of the rectangular substrate. Furthermore, the system contains a plurality of light-distributing planar ridge waveguides. These light-distributing planar ridge waveguides are combined into a set of waveguides that are arranged in parallel to each other and are intended to guide lights of different colors. A plurality of such sets extends across the substrate perpendicular to the light-separating planar ridge waveguide to which the plurality of sets is optically coupled. For RGB lights, each set may comprise a triplet that consists of parallel planar ridge waveguides for propagating red, green, and blue lights.
The core surface of each light-separating planar ridge waveguide contains a pattern of first individual light beam-redirection means in the form of light-separating digital planar holograms that redirect the light of different wavelengths obtained from specific lasers into the corresponding light-distributing planar ridge waveguides. The latter, in turn, have on the surfaces of their cores a set of first illuminating digital planar holograms that redirect a part of the light outward in both directions from the plane of the transparent substrate. It is understood that the upward component of light is a parasitic component because it enters the eyes of the viewer without interacting with the image-forming matrix, e.g., the LCD matrix. In other words, this light does not carry image information and must be eliminated. In order to achieve this objective, the system is provided with a set of second illuminating digital holograms that double the intensity of light emitted in the downward direction, i.e., toward the LCD matrix, and extinguish the aforementioned parasitic light components. In other words, the front illumination unit of the invention is provided with binary illuminating holograms, i.e., holograms of the first type and holograms of the second type, as mentioned above.
According to the invention, elimination of parasitic light is achieved by placing the first illuminating digital planar hologram on one side of the core that is embedded in the cladding (or placed onto the cladding surface) and placing the second illuminating digital planar hologram on the other side of the core. The holograms of both types are identical but their interpositions are selected so that light beams directed from the holograms of the same core in the downward direction are doubled while light beams directed from the holograms of the same core in the upward direction are extinguished. More specifically, holograms of both types are arranged so that with the selection of a predetermined core thickness, light emitted from neighboring holograms of the first type and of the second type interfere with each other at a predetermined phase shift that doubles the downward light components and extinguishes the upward light components.
Thus, the same objective as that claimed in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/373,434 is achieved but without the use of second light-redirecting means, i.e., reflective mirrors. As a result, the structure is simplified, thus reducing manufacturing cost of the frontlight unit for reflective displays as a whole.
The system of the invention is suitable for reflective displays of many types, including IMOD matrix reflective displays, electrophoretic reflective displays, LCD displays, or the like, including monochromatic displays.
According to another aspect of the invention, the reflective-display frontlight illumination system of the above-described type may have holograms that are further provided with light-focusing features so that light beam focus points can be located above and below the holograms in the upper and lower parts of the cladding, respectively, i.e., above or below the core. Actual positions of such focus points are determined by hologram pattern topology. This makes it possible to form converging and/or diverging light beams, and this property, in turn, can contribute to uniformity of illumination.
The present invention relates to a frontlight illumination system for reflective displays having pixels arranged in a matrix pattern and is aimed at improving image quality, i.e., brightness and contrast of images reproduced for displays used in ambient light. Displays of this type are employed, e.g., in electronic calculators, electronic labels, so-called electronic paper, etc., and are also aimed at decreasing energy consumption of the light source.
The invention will now be described in detail with reference to the accompanying drawings, where
As shown in
It should be noted that the matrix of the LCD elements is beyond the scope of the present invention and is shown only as an example. The frontlight illumination unit 22 of the invention may operate in conjunction with other image-generation units, such as electrophoretic reflective displays, etc.
The frontlight illumination unit 22 has a rectangular transparent substrate 26, the surface of which is covered with a net 28 of planar ridge waveguides (
The net consists of one light-separating planar ridge waveguide 30 which extends along one side of the rectangular transparent substrate 26 and a plurality of light-distributing planar ridge waveguides 32a, 32b . . . 32n (
The light-distributing planar ridge waveguides 32a, 32b . . . 32n are combined into parallel sets of waveguides to guide lights of different colors. A plurality of such parallel sets extends across the substrate perpendicular to the light-separating planar ridge waveguide 30 to which the parallel sets are optically coupled, as mentioned above. With regard to RGB lights, each set may comprise a triplet that consists of parallel light-distributing planar ridge waveguides in order to propagate red, green, and blue lights. In
In these triplets, the illuminating digital planar holograms comprise holograms of at least three types, wherein a hologram of each type interacts with the light of a wavelength different from the wavelengths specified for the holograms of other types.
As shown in
As mentioned above, the first illuminating digital planar holograms 42Ra1, 42Ra2, 42Gb1 . . . 42Bn(m−1), and 42Bnm are located on one side of the core that is embedded in the cladding, and the second illuminating digital planar holograms 42′Ra1, 42′Ra2, 42′Gb1 . . . 42′Bn(m−1), and 42′Bnm are located on the other side of the core. Holograms of both types are identical, but their positions in each monochromatic light-distributing waveguide are different and are selected so that light beams Iλ1D, Iλ2D, Iλ3D . . . directed from holograms of the same core in the downward direction are doubled while light beams Iλ1U, Iλ1U, Iλ3U . . . directed from the holograms of the same core in the upward direction are extinguished.
More specifically, the holograms 42Ra1, 42Ra2, 42Gb1 . . . 42Bn(m−1), 42Bnm and 42′Ra1, 42′Ra2, 42′Gb1 . . . 42′Bn(m−1), 42′Bnm of both types are arranged so that with selection of a predetermined thickness of the cores 44Ra, 44Gb, 44Gb . . . , lights emitted from neighboring illuminating holograms, e.g., 42Ra1 and 42′Ra1 of the first type and lights emitted from the illuminating holograms of the second type interfere with each other at a predetermined phase shift δ that doubles the downward-light components and extinguishes the upward-light components.
In other words, the system comprises first individual light beam-redirection means, in the form of holograms such as holograms 42Ra1, 42Ra2, 42Gb1 . . . 42Bn(m−1), and 42Bnm formed on one of the core surfaces located in the aforementioned predetermined places of the net for redirecting individual light beams that propagate through light-distributing means in the first direction relative to the planar ridge waveguide medium and in the second direction relative to the planar ridge waveguide medium; and second light beam-redirection means in the form of holograms 42′Ra1, 42′Ra2, 42′Gb1 . . . 42′Bn (m−1), and 42′Bnm on other core surfaces for redirecting individual light beams that propagate through light-distributing means in the first direction relative to the planar ridge waveguide medium and in the second direction relative to the planar ridge waveguide medium.
Let us consider conditions of constructive interference for light beams Iλ1D and I′λ1D which are emitted from a pair of neighboring, illuminating digital planar holograms 42Ra1 and 42′Ra1 formed on the core 44Ra of the waveguide 32a and which propagate downward (D designates downward in the drawing) and perpendicular to the frontlight illumination unit 22.
For each wavelength, the above condition of constructive interference of light is expressed as follows (
(d−δ)/λ=ni (1)
where d is thickness of the waveguide core through which light propagates with wavelength λ, where δ is distance between centers of the neighboring first and second illuminating digital planar holograms of the pair, and where ni is an integer.
More specifically, for wavelength λ1, the above condition is shown in
(d1−δ1)/λ1=n1 (2)
where d1 is thickness of the waveguide core through which light propagates with wavelength λ1, which is the wavelength of light in the material of the core with refractive index “n” (λ1n=λ′1, where λ′1 is the wavelength of light in a free space); δ1 is distance between centers of the first illuminating digital planar hologram 42Ra1 and the neighboring second illuminating digital planar hologram 42′Ra1.
Similar relations exist for wavelengths λ2 and λ3:
(d2−δ2)/λ2=n2 (3)
and
(d3−δ3)/λ3=n3 (4)
The condition of destructive interference with regard to beams Iλ1U and I′λ1U emitted from the holograms 42Ra1 and 42′Ra1 formed on the core 44Ra of the waveguide 32a and propagating upward (U designates upward in the drawing) and perpendicular to the frontlight illumination unit 22 (
(d+δ)/λ=ni+½ (5)
where d is thickness of the core, λ is a wavelength, δ is distance between centers of the first illuminating digital planar hologram 42Ra1 and the neighboring second illuminating digital planar hologram 42′Ra1, and ni is an integer. The beams Iλ1U and I′λ1U emitted from the binary hologram that consists of the holograms 42Ra1 and 42′Ra1 formed on the core 44Ra of the waveguide 32a propagate upward (in the drawing, U designates upward) and perpendicular to the frontlight illumination unit 22.
The condition of destructive interference is written for parasitic lights that are directed to the external surface.
In this case, the following can be written for wavelength λ1:
(d1+δ1)/λ1=n′1+½ (6)
where d1 is thickness of the waveguide core through which light propagates with wavelength λ1, which is the wavelength of light in the material of the core with a refractive index “n” (λ1 n=λ′1, where λ′1 is the wavelength of light in a free space); δ1 is distance between the nearest edges of the binary hologram 42Ra1 and 42′Ra1, as shown in
Similar relationships exist between wavelengths λ′1 and λ′2:
(d2+δ2)/λ2=n′2+½ (7)
and
(d3+δ3)/λ3=n′3+½ (8)
To determine real parameters of the frontlight illumination unit 22, it is necessary to consider the aforementioned relations in pairs for constructive and destructive interference and for each wavelength λ′1, λ′2, λ′3, i.e., to consider equations (2) and (6), (3) and (7), and (4) and (8) simultaneously.
The wavelength 32a delivers red light with the wavelength λ′1 to the pair of holograms 42Ra1 and 42′Ra. λ′1 is equal to 638 nm. Similarly, for holograms that emit green light and blue light, λ′2 is 532 nm and λ′3 is 445 nm, respectively.
For the [waveguide SiO2-cladding SiO2] structure, the refractive index is assumed equal to n=1.5. Parameters of the frontlight illumination unit 22 are exemplified in Table 1. It is understood that a combination of parameters other than those shown in Table 1 is possible. For example, a set of parameters that provides constructive and destructive interference for lights of wavelengths λ′1, λ′2, λ′3 directed downward and upward from each pair of binary holograms 42Ra1-42′Ra1, 42Ra24-2′Ra2, 42Gb1-42′Gb1 . . . 42Bn(m−1)-42′Bn(m−1), and 42Bnm-42′Bnm can also be obtained for values of n1=n2=n3=1.
Thus, it becomes possible to achieve the same objective as that in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/373,434 but without the use of second light-redirecting means, i.e., reflective mirrors.
In accordance with the aspect of the invention described above, cores of the light-distribution planar ridge waveguides 32a, 32b . . . 32n vary in thickness. To some extent this complicates manufacturing of the system.
In accordance with another aspect of the invention, it becomes possible to simplify the structure and thus to reduce manufacturing cost of the system as a whole.
Let us consider the following equation pairs: (1) and (4); (2) and (5); and (3) and (6). Also, let us find parameters δ1, δ2, and δ3 at which equations of the above pairs can satisfy equality of the left and right parts at approximately the same value of parameter “d”. In this case, n1, n2, and n3 may comprise an arbitrary integer that is specific for each pair. Shown in
The term “approximately” used in the previous paragraph means that the light propagating downward, i.e., toward the image-generating unit 24, and the light propagating upward toward the viewer do not fully interfere constructively or destructively but interfere partially with a degree of 75 to 90%, or higher. Although this condition creates some undesired light that does not carry image information, this insignificant drawback is to a great extent compensated by a multifold increase in image brightness provided by the downward component of light when the latter interacts with the image-generating unit 24. This is confirmed by the example given below.
Let us select a value of “d” equal to 550 nm in all six equations (2) and (6); (3) and (7); and (4) and (8). For λ′1=638 nm, δ1=110 nm, and n1=1, the equation pair (1) and (4) can be realized with accuracy of approximately 100%. Similarly, for λ′2=532 nm, δ2=100 nm, and n2=1, the equation pair (2) and (5) can be realized with accuracy of 85% or higher. For λ′3=440 nm, δ3=50 nm, and n3=2, the equation pair (4) and (8) can be realized with accuracy of approximately 82%. In other words, the approximation described above is justifiable.
Also, the condition of equality of thickness “d” in all cores is achieved by selecting appropriate values of δ and n in the equation mentioned above.
Although the invention is shown and described with reference to specific embodiments, it is understood that these embodiments should not be construed as limiting the areas of application of the invention and that any changes and modifications are possible provided that these changes and modifications do not depart from the scope of the attached patent claims. Thus, numerical values of parameters are given only as examples, and other values can be selected to optimize design of the lightguide plate. It is understood that the sets of parallel light-distributing planar ridge waveguides may contain more than three waveguides and may comprise, e.g., six waveguides composed of three pairs of waveguides operating with light of the same wavelength in each pair. Alternatively, each set may contain four waveguides to operate with the light of four different wavelengths, e.g., red, green, blue, and yellow.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6650382 | Sumida et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
| 6657683 | Richard | Dec 2003 | B2 |
| 6999665 | Veligdan | Feb 2006 | B2 |
| 7502081 | Umemoto et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
| 7508466 | Hutchins | Mar 2009 | B2 |
| 7603001 | Wang et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
| 7733439 | Sampsell et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
| 7777954 | Gruhike et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
| 7813026 | Sampsell | Oct 2010 | B2 |
| 7845841 | Sampsell | Dec 2010 | B2 |
| 7855827 | Xu et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
| 7859610 | Mizushima et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
| 7859731 | Choi | Dec 2010 | B2 |
| 7864395 | Chui | Jan 2011 | B2 |
| 7944524 | Akiyama et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
| 7949213 | Mienko et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
| 8009244 | Toriyama et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
| 20070133226 | Mi | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20080259247 | Stuart et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20090086466 | Sugita et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090296194 | Gally et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20090303417 | Mizushima et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20110026270 | Onishi | Feb 2011 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20130242596 A1 | Sep 2013 | US |
