Fuel assembly

Description

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of the Invention

The present invention relates generally to nuclear fuel assemblies used in the core of a nuclear reactor, and relates more specifically to metal nuclear fuel elements.

2. Description of Related Art

U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2009/0252278 A1, the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference, discloses a nuclear fuel assembly that includes seed and blanket sub-assemblies. The blanket sub-assembly includes thorium-based fuel elements. The seed sub-assembly includes Uranium and/or Plutonium metal fuel elements used to release neutrons, which are captured by the Thorium blanket elements, thereby creating fissionable U-233 that burns in situ and releases heat for the nuclear power plant.

Conventional nuclear power plants typically use fuel assemblies that include a plurality of fuel rods that each comprise uranium oxide fuel in a cylindrical tube.

SUMMARY OF EMBODIMENTS OF THE INVENTION

The surface area of the cylindrical tube of conventional fuel rods limits the amount of heat that can be transferred from the rod to the primary coolant. To avoid overheating the fuel rod in view of the limited surface area for heat flux removal, the amount of fissile material in these uranium oxide fuel rods or mixed oxide (plutonium and uranium oxide) fuel rods has conventionally been substantially limited.

One or more embodiments of the present invention overcome various disadvantages of conventional uranium oxide fuel rods by replacing them with all metal, multi-lobed, powder metallurgy co-extruded fuel rods (fuel elements). The metal fuel elements have significantly more surface area than their uranium oxide rod counterparts, and therefore facilitate significantly more heat transfer from the fuel element to the primary coolant at a lower temperature. The spiral ribs of the multi-lobed fuel elements provide structural support to the fuel element, which may facilitate the reduction in the quantity or elimination of spacer grids that might otherwise have been required. Reduction in the quantity or elimination of such spacer grids advantageously reduces the hydraulic drag on the coolant, which can improve heat transfer to the coolant. Because the metal fuel elements may be relatively more compact than their conventional uranium oxide fuel rod counterparts, more space within the fuel assembly is provided for coolant, which again reduces hydraulic drag and improves heat transfer to the coolant. The higher heat transfer from the metal fuel rods to the coolant means that it is possible to generate more heat (i.e., power), while simultaneously maintaining the fuel elements at a lower operating temperature due to the considerably higher thermal conductivity of metals versus oxides. Although conventional uranium oxide or mixed oxide fuel rods typically are limited to fissile material loading of around 4-5% due to overheating concerns, the higher heat transfer properties of the metal fuel elements according to various embodiments of the present invention enable significantly greater fissile material loadings to be used while still maintaining safe fuel performance. Ultimately, the use of metal fuel elements according to one or more embodiments of the present invention can provide more power from the same reactor core than possible with conventional uranium oxide or mixed oxide fuel rods.

The use of all-metal fuel elements according to one or more embodiments of the present invention may advantageously reduce the risk of fuel failure because the metal fuel elements reduce the risk of fission gas release to the primary coolant, as is possible in conventional uranium oxide or mixed oxide fuel rods.

The use of all-metal fuel elements according to one or more embodiments of the present invention may also be safer than conventional uranium oxide fuel rods because the all-metal design increases heat transfer within the fuel element, thereby reducing temperature variations within the fuel element, and reducing the risk of localized overheating of the fuel element.

One or more embodiments of the present invention provide a fuel assembly for use in a core of a nuclear power reactor (e.g., a land-based or marine nuclear reactor). The assembly includes a frame comprising a lower nozzle that is shaped and configured to mount to the nuclear reactor internal core structure, and a plurality of elongated metal fuel elements supported by the frame. Each of the plurality of fuel elements includes a metal fuel alloy kernel comprising metal fuel material and a metal non-fuel material. The fuel material includes fissile material. Each fuel element also includes a cladding surrounding the fuel kernel. The plurality of elongated metal fuel elements provide at least 70% by volume of the overall fissile material of the fuel assembly.

One or more embodiments of the present invention provide a fuel assembly for use in a core of a nuclear power reactor. The assembly includes a frame including a lower nozzle that is shaped and configured to mount to the nuclear reactor internal core structure. The assembly also includes a plurality of elongated, extruded metal fuel elements supported by the frame, each of said plurality of fuel elements including a metal fuel alloy kernel including metal fuel material and a metal non-fuel material. The fuel material includes fissile material. The fuel element also includes a cladding surrounding the fuel kernel. A moderator:fuel ratio in a region of the metal fuel elements is 2.5 or less.

One or more embodiments of the present invention provide a method of manufacturing a fuel assembly for use in a core of a nuclear power reactor. The method includes manufacturing each of a plurality of elongated metal fuel elements by: mixing powder metal fuel with powder metal non-fuel material, wherein the powder metal fuel material includes fissile material, sintering the mixed powder metal fuel and metal non-fuel material to create a fuel core stock, surrounding the fuel core stock with a cladding material, and co-extruding the fuel core stock and cladding material to create the fuel element. The method also includes mounting the plurality of elongated metal fuel elements to a frame of the fuel assembly. A moderator:fuel ratio in a region of the metal fuel elements may be 2.5 or less. The method may include positioning a displacer within the mixed powder metal fuel material and metal non-fuel material before said sintering such that said sintering results in a fuel core stock that includes the displacer. The fuel assembly may be placed into a land-based nuclear power reactor.

According to one or more of these embodiments, the plurality of elongated metal fuel elements provide at least 60% of a total volume of all fuel elements of the fuel assembly.

According to one or more of these embodiments, an average thickness of the cladding is at least 0.6 mm.

According to one or more of these embodiments, the fuel assembly is thermodynamically designed and physically shaped for operation in a land-based nuclear power reactor.

According to one or more embodiments, the fuel assembly may be used in combination with a land-based nuclear power reactor, wherein the fuel assembly is disposed within the land-based nuclear power reactor.

According to one or more of these embodiments, with respect to a plurality of the plurality of fuel elements: the fuel material of the fuel kernel is enriched to 20% or less by uranium-235 and/or uranium-233 and comprises between a 20% and 30% volume fraction of the fuel kernel; and the non-fuel metal includes between a 70% and 80% volume fraction of the fuel kernel. With respect to the plurality of the plurality of fuel elements, the fuel material enrichment may be between 15% and 20%. The non-fuel metal of the fuel kernel may include zirconium.

According to one or more of these embodiments, the kernel includes δ-phase UZr₂.

According to one or more of these embodiments, with respect to a plurality of the plurality of fuel elements: the fuel material of the fuel kernel includes plutonium; the non-fuel metal of the fuel kernel includes zirconium; and the non-fuel metal of the fuel kernel includes between a 70% and 97% volume fraction of the fuel kernel.

According to one or more of these embodiments, the fuel material includes a combination of: uranium and thorium; plutonium and thorium; or uranium, plutonium, and thorium.

According to one or more of these embodiments, the cladding of a plurality of the plurality of fuel elements is metallurgically bonded to the fuel kernel.

According to one or more of these embodiments, the non-fuel metal of a plurality of the plurality of fuel elements includes aluminum.

According to one or more of these embodiments, the non-fuel metal of a plurality of the plurality of fuel elements includes a refractory metal.

According to one or more of these embodiments, the cladding of a plurality of the plurality of fuel elements includes zirconium.

According to one or more of these embodiments, a plurality of the plurality of fuel elements are manufactured via co-extrusion of the fuel kernel and cladding.

According to one or more of these embodiments, the fuel assembly, one or more fuel elements thereof, and/or one or more fuel kernels thereof includes burnable poison.

According to one or more of these embodiments, the plurality of elongated metal fuel elements provide at least 80% by volume of the overall fissile material of the fuel assembly.

According to one or more of these embodiments, the land-based nuclear power reactor comprises a conventional nuclear power plant having a reactor design that was in actual use before 2010. The frame may be shaped and configured to fit into the land-based nuclear power reactor in place of a conventional uranium oxide fuel assembly for the reactor.

According to one or more of these embodiments, one or more of the fuel elements has a spirally twisted, multi-lobed profile that defines a plurality of spiral ribs. The spacer ribs of adjacent ones of the plurality of fuel elements may periodically contact each other over the axial length of the fuel elements, such contact helping to maintain the spacing of the fuel elements relative to each other. The fuel assembly may have a moderator to fuel ratio of at least 2.5 or 2.5 or less. The multi-lobed profile may include concave areas between adjacent lobes.

According to one or more of these embodiments, the respective metal fuel alloy kernels of the plurality of metal fuel elements are formed via sintering of the fuel material and metal non-fuel material.

According to one or more of these embodiments, the multi-lobed profile includes lobe tips and intersections between adjacent lobes, wherein the cladding is thicker at the tips than at the intersections.

One or more embodiments of the present invention provide a method of manufacturing a fuel assembly for use in a core of a land-based nuclear power reactor. The method includes manufacturing each of a plurality of elongated metal fuel elements by mixing powder metal fuel with powder metal non-fuel material, wherein the powder metal fuel material includes fissile material. The manufacturing of each of the elongated metal fuel elements also includes sintering the mixed powder metal fuel and metal non-fuel material to create a fuel core stock, surrounding the fuel core stock with a cladding material, and co-extruding the fuel core stock and cladding material to create the fuel element. The method also includes mounting the plurality of elongated metal fuel elements to a frame of the fuel assembly comprising a lower nozzle that is shaped and configured to mount to a core of the land-based nuclear power reactor. The plurality of elongated metal fuel elements provide at least 70% by volume of the overall fissile material of the fuel assembly. The fuel assembly is thermodynamically designed and physically shaped for operation in the land-based nuclear power reactor.

According to one or more of these embodiments, the method also includes positioning a displacer within the mixed powder metal fuel material and metal non-fuel material before the sintering such that the sintering results in a fuel core stock that includes the displacer.

According to one or more of these embodiments, the method also includes placing the fuel assembly into the land-based nuclear power reactor.

One or more embodiments of the present invention provide a nuclear reactor that includes a pressurized heavy water reactor and a fuel assembly disposed in the pressurized heavy water reactor. The fuel assembly includes a plurality of elongated metal fuel elements mounted to each other. Each of the plurality of fuel elements includes a powder metallurgy metal fuel alloy kernel comprising metal fuel material and a metal non-fuel material, the fuel material comprising fissile material. Each fuel element also includes a cladding surrounding the fuel kernel. The plurality of elongated metal fuel elements provide at least 70% by volume of the overall fissile material of the fuel assembly. Each of the fuel elements may have a spirally twisted, multi-lobed profile that defines a plurality of spiral spacer ribs.

One or more embodiments of the present invention provide a nuclear reactor that includes a pressurized heavy water reactor; and a fuel assembly disposed in the pressurized heavy water reactor. The fuel assembly includes a plurality of elongated metal fuel elements mounted to each other, each of said plurality of fuel elements including: a metal fuel alloy kernel comprising metal fuel material and a metal non-fuel material, the fuel material comprising fissile material, and a cladding surrounding the fuel kernel. A moderator:fuel ratio in a region of the metal fuel elements may be 2.5 or less.

According to one or more of these embodiments, the fuel assembly also includes a plurality of UO₂fuel elements supported by the frame, each of said plurality of UO₂fuel elements comprising UO₂fuel. At least some of the plurality of elongated UO₂fuel elements may be positioned laterally outwardly from the plurality of elongated metal fuel elements. The UO₂fuel may have less than 15% U-235 enrichment.

According to one or more of these embodiments, a shroud separates coolant flow past the plurality of elongated UO₂fuel elements from coolant flow past the plurality of elongated metal fuel elements.

One or more embodiments of the present invention provide a fuel assembly for use in a core of a nuclear power reactor. The assembly includes a frame comprising a lower nozzle that is shaped and configured to mount to the nuclear reactor internal core structure. The assembly includes a plurality of elongated, extruded metal fuel elements supported by the frame. Each of said plurality of fuel elements includes a metal fuel alloy kernel comprising metal fuel material and a metal non-fuel material, the fuel material comprising fissile material, and a cladding surrounding the fuel kernel. The assembly includes a plurality of additional elongated fuel elements supported by the frame. As viewed in a cross-section of the fuel assembly, the plurality of additional elongated fuel elements may be positioned in a single-fuel-element-wide ring that surrounds the plurality of elongated, extruded metal fuel elements. The plurality of elongated metal fuel elements may provide at least 60% of a total volume of all fuel elements of the fuel assembly.

According to one or more of these embodiments, the plurality of additional elongated fuel elements each comprise a hollow rod with pelletized UO₂fuel disposed inside the rod.

According to one or more of these embodiments, a portion of the fuel assembly that supports the plurality of additional elongated fuel elements is inseparable from a portion of the fuel assembly that supports the plurality of elongated, extruded metal fuel elements.

According to one or more of these embodiments, the plurality of additional elongated fuel elements are not separable as a unit from the plurality of elongated, extruded metal fuel elements.

According to one or more of these embodiments, the fuel assembly defines a 17×17 pattern of positions; each of the plurality of elongated, extruded metal fuel elements is disposed at one of the pattern positions; none of the plurality of elongated, extruded metal fuel elements are disposed at any of the peripheral positions of the 17×17 pattern; and each of the plurality of additional elongated fuel elements is disposed in a different one of the peripheral positions of the 17×17 pattern.

According to one or more of the above embodiments, the kernel may comprise ceramic fuel material instead of metal fuel material. In one or more such embodiments, the fuel material comprises ceramic fuel material disposed in a matrix of metal non-fuel material. Conversely, in one or more metal fuel embodiments, the plurality of elongated, extruded fuel elements comprise a plurality of elongated, extruded metal fuel elements; the fuel material comprises metal fuel material; and the fuel kernel comprises a metal fuel alloy kernel comprising an alloy of the metal fuel material and the matrix of metal non-fuel material.

These and other aspects of various embodiments of the present invention, as well as the methods of operation and functions of the related elements of structure and the combination of parts and economies of manufacture, will become more apparent upon consideration of the following description and the appended claims with reference to the accompanying drawings, all of which form a part of this specification, wherein like reference numerals designate corresponding parts in the various figures. In one embodiment of the invention, the structural components illustrated herein are drawn to scale. It is to be expressly understood, however, that the drawings are for the purpose of illustration and description only and are not intended as a definition of the limits of the invention. In addition, it should be appreciated that structural features shown or described in any one embodiment herein can be used in other embodiments as well. As used in the specification and in the claims, the singular form of “a”, “an”, and “the” include plural referents unless the context clearly dictates otherwise.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

For a better understanding of embodiments of the present invention as well as other objects and further features thereof, reference is made to the following description which is to be used in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, where:

FIG. 1 is a cross-sectional view of a fuel assembly according to an embodiment of the present invention, the cross-section being taken in a self-spacing plane;

FIG. 2 is a cross-sectional view of the fuel assembly of FIG. 1, the cross-section being taken in a plane that is shifted by ⅛ of a twist of the fuel elements from the view in FIG. 1;

FIG. 3 is a cross-sectional view of the fuel assembly of FIG. 1, taken in a plane that is parallel to the axial direction of the fuel assembly;

FIG. 4 is a perspective view of a fuel element of the fuel assembly of FIG. 1;

FIG. 5 is a cross-sectional view of the fuel element in FIG. 3;

FIG. 6 is a cross-sectional view of the fuel element in FIG. 3, circumscribed within a regular polygon;

FIG. 7A is an end view of a fuel assembly according to an alternative embodiment, for use in a pressurized heavy water reactor;

FIG. 7B is a partial side view of the fuel assembly of FIG. 7A;

FIG. 8 is a diagram of a pressurized heavy water reactor using the fuel assembly illustrated in FIGS. 7A and 7B

FIG. 9 is a cross-sectional view of the fuel element in FIG. 3; and

FIG. 10 is a cross-sectional view of a fuel assembly according to an embodiment of the invention.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF EXEMPLARY EMBODIMENTS OF THE INVENTION

FIGS. 1-3 illustrate a fuel assembly 10 according to an embodiment of the present invention. As shown in FIG. 3, the fuel assembly 10 comprises a plurality of fuel elements 20 supported by a frame 25.

As shown in FIG. 3, the frame 25 comprises a shroud 30, guide tubes 40, an upper nozzle 50, a lower nozzle 60, a lower tie plate 70, an upper tie plate 80, and/or other structure(s) that enable the assembly 10 to operate as a fuel assembly in a nuclear reactor. One or more of these components of the frame 25 may be omitted according to various embodiments without deviating from the scope of the present invention.

As shown in FIG. 3, the shroud 25 mounts to the upper nozzle 50 and lower nozzle 60. The lower nozzle 60 (or other suitable structure of the assembly 10) is constructed and shaped to provide a fluid communication interface between the assembly 10 and the reactor 90 into which the assembly 10 is placed so as to facilitate coolant flow into the reactor core through the assembly 10 via the lower nozzle 60. The upper nozzle 50 facilitates direction of the heated coolant from the assembly 10 to the power plant's steam generators (for PWRs), turbines (for BWRs), etc. The nozzles 50, 60 have a shape that is specifically designed to properly mate with the reactor core internal structure.

As shown in FIG. 3, the lower tie plate 70 and upper tie plate 80 are preferably rigidly mounted (e.g., via welding, suitable fasteners (e.g., bolts, screws), etc.) to the shroud 30 or lower nozzle 60 (and/or other suitable structural components of the assembly 10).

Lower axial ends of the elements 20 form pins 20a that fit into holes 70a in the lower tie plate 70 to support the elements 20 and help maintain proper element 20 spacing. The pins 20a mount to the holes 70a in a manner that prevents the elements 20 from rotating about their axes or axially moving relative to the lower tie plate 70. This restriction on rotation helps to ensure that contact points between adjacent elements 20 all occur at the same axial positions along the elements 20 (e.g., at self-spacing planes discussed below). The connection between the pins 20a and holes 70a may be created via welding, interference fit, mating non-cylindrical features that prevent rotation (e.g., keyway and spline), and/or any other suitable mechanism for restricting axial and/or rotational movement of the elements 20 relative to the lower tie plate 70. The lower tie plate 70 includes axially extending channels (e.g., a grid of openings) through which coolant flows toward the elements 20.

Upper axial ends of the elements 20 form pins 20a that freely fit into holes 80a in the upper tie plate 80 to permit the upper pins 20a to freely axially move upwardly through to the upper tie plate 80 while helping to maintain the spacing between elements 20. As a result, when the elements 20 axially grow during fission, the elongating elements 20 can freely extend further into the upper tie plate 80.

As shown in FIG. 4, the pins 70a transition into a central portion of the element 20.

FIGS. 4 and 5 illustrate an individual fuel element/rod 20 of the assembly 10. As shown in FIG. 5, the elongated central portion of the fuel element 20 has a four-lobed cross-section. A cross-section of the element 20 remains substantially uniform over the length of the central portion of the element 20. Each fuel element 20 has a fuel kernel 100, which includes a refractory metal and fuel material that includes fissile material.

A displacer 110 that comprises a refractory metal is placed along the longitudinal axis in the center of the fuel kernel 100. The displacer 110 helps to limit the temperature in the center of the thickest part of the fuel element 20 by displacing fissile material that would otherwise occupy such space and minimize variations in heat flux along the surface of the fuel element. According to various embodiments, the displacer 110 may be eliminated altogether.

As shown in FIG. 5, the fuel kernel 100 is enclosed by a refractory metal cladding 120. The cladding 120 is preferably thick enough, strong enough, and flexible enough to endure the radiation-induced swelling of the kernel 100 without failure (e.g., without exposing the kernel 100 to the environment outside the cladding 120). According to one or more embodiments, the entire cladding 120 is at least 0.3 mm, 0.4 mm, 0.5 mm, and/or 0.7 mm thick. According to one or more embodiments, the cladding 120 thickness is at least 0.4 mm in order to reduce a chance of swelling-based failure, oxidation based failure, and/or any other failure mechanism of the cladding 120.

The cladding 120 may have a substantially uniform thickness in the annular direction (i.e., around the perimeter of the cladding 120 as shown in the cross-sectional view of FIG. 5) and over the axial/longitudinal length of the kernel 100 (as shown in FIG. 4). Alternatively, as shown in FIG. 5, according to one or more embodiments, the cladding 120 is thicker at the tips of the lobes 20b than at the concave intersection/area 20c between the lobes 20b. For example, according to one or more embodiments, the cladding 120 at the tips of the lobes 20b is at least 10%, 20%, 30%, 40%, 50%, 60%, 70%, 80%, 90%, 100%, 125%, and/or 150% thicker than the cladding 120 at the concave intersections/areas 20c. The thicker cladding 120 at the tips of the lobes 20b provides improved wear resistance at the tips of the lobes 20b where adjacent fuel elements 20 touch each other at the self-spacing planes (discussed below).

The refractory metal used in the displacer 110, the fuel kernel 100, and the cladding 120 comprises zirconium according to one or more embodiments of the invention. As used herein, the term zirconium means pure zirconium or zirconium in combination with other alloy material(s). However, other refractory metals may be used instead of zirconium without deviating from the scope of the present invention (e.g., niobium, molybdenum, tantalum, tungsten, rhenium, titanium, vanadium, chromium, zirconium, hafnium, ruthenium, osmium, iridium, and/or other metals). As used herein, the term “refractory metal” means any metal/alloy that has a melting point above 1800 degrees Celsius (2073K).

Moreover, in certain embodiments, the refractory metal may be replaced with another non-fuel metal, e.g., aluminum. However, the use of a non-refractory non-fuel metal is best suited for reactor cores that operate at lower temperatures (e.g., small cores that have a height of about 1 meter and an electric power rating of 100 MWe or less). Refractory metals are preferred for use in cores with higher operating temperatures.

As shown in FIG. 5, the central portion of the fuel kernel 100 and cladding 120 has a four-lobed profile forming spiral spacer ribs 130. The displacer 110 may also be shaped so as to protrude outwardly at the ribs 130 (e.g., corners of the square displacer 110 are aligned with the ribs 130). According to alternative embodiments of the present invention, the fuel elements 20 may have greater or fewer numbers of ribs 130 without deviating from the scope of the present invention. For example, as generally illustrated in FIG. 5 of U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2009/0252278 A1, a fuel element may have three ribs/lobes, which are preferably equally circumferentially spaced from each other. The number of lobes/ribs 130 may depend, at least in part, on the shape of the fuel assembly 10. For example, a four-lobed element 20 may work well with a square cross-sectioned fuel assembly 10 (e.g., as is used in the AP-1000). In contrast, a three-lobed fuel element may work well with a hexagonal fuel assembly (e.g., as is used in the VVER).

FIG. 9 illustrates various dimensions of the fuel element 20 according to one or more embodiments. According to one or more embodiments, any of these dimensions, parameters and/or ranges, as identified in the below table, can be increased or decreased by up to 5%, 10%, 15%, 20%, 25%, 30%, 40%, 50%, or more without deviating from the scope of the present invention.

Fuel Element 20 Parameter
Symbol
Example Values
Unit

Circumscribed diameter
D
9-14 (e.g., 12.3, 12.4, 12.5,
mm

12.6)

Lobe thickness
Δ
2.5-3.8 (e.g., 2.5, 2.6, 2.7, 2.8,
mm

2.9, 3.0, 3.1, 3.2, 3.3, 3.4, 3.5,

3.6, 3.7, 3.8), variable

Minimum cladding thickness
δ
0.4-1.2 (e.g., 0.4, 0.5, 0.6, 0.7,
mm

0.8, 0.9, 1.0, 1.1, 1.2)

Cladding thickness at the lobe
δ^max
0.4-2.2 (e.g., 0.4, 0.5, 0.6, 0.7,
mm

0.8, 0.9, 1.0, 1.1, 1.2, 1.3, 1.4,

1.5, 1.6, 1.7, 1.8, 1.9, 2.0, 2.1,

2.2), 1.5δ, 2δ, 2.5δ

Average cladding thickness

0.4-1.8 (e.g., 0.4, 0.5, 0.6,
mm

0.7, 0.8, 0.9, 1.0, 1.1, 1.2, 1.3,

1.4, 1.5, 1.6, 1.7, 1.8), at least

0.4, 0.5, or 0.6

Curvature radius of cladding at lobe
r
Δ/2, Δ/1.9, variable
mm

periphery

Curvature radius of fuel kernel at lobe
r_f
0.5-2.0 (e.g., 0.5, 0.6, 0.7, 0.8,
mm

periphery

0.9, 1.0, 1.1, 1.2, 1.3, 1.4, 1.5,

1.6, 1.7, 1.8, 1.9, 2.0), (Δ-

2δ)/2, variable

Radius of curvature between adjacent
R
2-5 (e.g., 2, 3, 4, 5), variable
mm

lobes

Central displacer side length
a
1.5-3.5 (e.g., 1.5, 1.6, 1.7, 1.8,
mm

1.9, 2.0, 2.1, 2.2, 2.3, 2.4, 2.5,

2.6, 2.7, 2.8, 2.9, 3.0, 3.1, 3.2,

3.3, 3.4, 3.5)

Fuel element perimeter

25-60 (e.g., 25, 30, 35, 40, 45,
mm

50, 55, 60)

Fuel element area

50-100 (e.g., 50, 60, 70, 80,
mm²

90, 100)

Fuel kernel area, mm²

30-70 (e.g., 30, 40, 50, 60, 70)
mm²

Enrichment

≤19.7
w/o

U fraction

≤25
v/o

As shown in FIG. 4, the displacer 110 has a cross-sectional shape of a square regular quadrilateral with the corners of the square regular quadrilateral being aligned with the ribs 130. The displacer 110 forms a spiral that follows the spiral of the ribs 130 so that the corners of the displacer 110 remain aligned with the ribs 130 along the axial length of the fuel kernel 100. In alternative embodiments with greater or fewer ribs 130, the displacer 110 preferably has the cross-sectional shape of a regular polygon having as many sides as the element 20 has ribs.

As shown in FIG. 6, the cross-sectional area of the central portion of the element 20 is preferably substantially smaller than the area of a square 200 in which the tip of each of the ribs 130 is tangent to one side of the square 200. In more generic terms, the cross-sectional area of an element 20 having n ribs is preferably smaller than the area of a regular polygon having n sides in which the tip of each of the ribs 130 is tangent to one side of the polygon. According to various embodiments, a ratio of the area of the element 20 to the area of the square (or relevant regular polygon for elements 20 having greater or fewer than four ribs 130) is less than 0.7, 0.6, 0.5, 0.4, 0.35, 0.3. As shown in FIG. 1, this area ratio approximates how much of the available space within the shroud 30 is taken up by the fuel elements 20, such that a lower ratio means that more space is advantageously available for coolant, which also acts as a neutron moderator and which increases the moderator-to-fuel ratio (important for neutronics), reduces hydraulic drag, and increases the heat transfer from the elements 20 to the coolant. According to various embodiments, the resulting moderator to fuel ratio is at least 2.0, 2.25, 2.5, 2.75, and/or 3.0 (as opposed to 1.96 when conventional cylindrical uranium oxide rods are used). Similarly, according to various embodiments, the fuel assembly 10 flow area is increased by over 16% as compared to the use of one or more conventional fuel assemblies that use cylindrical uranium oxide rods. The increased flow area may decrease the coolant pressure drop through the assembly 10 (relative to conventional uranium oxide assemblies), which may have advantages with respect to pumping coolant through the assembly 10.

As shown in FIG. 4, the element 20 is axially elongated. In the illustrated embodiment, each element 20 is a full-length element and extends the entire way from lower tie plate 70 at or near the bottom of the assembly 10 to the upper tie plate 80 at or near the top of the assembly 10. According to various embodiments and reactor designs, this may result in elements 20 that are anywhere from 1 meter long (for compact reactors) to over 4 meters long. Thus, for typical reactors, the elements 20 may be between 1 and 5 meters long. However, the elements 20 may be lengthened or shortened to accommodate any other sized reactor without deviating from the scope of the present invention.

While the illustrated elements 20 are themselves full length, the elements 20 may alternatively be segmented, such that the multiple segments together make a full length element. For example, 4 individual 1 meter element segments 20 may be aligned end to end to effectively create the full-length element. Additional tie plates 70, 80 may be provided at the intersections between segments to maintain the axial spacing and arrangement of the segments.

According to one or more embodiments, the fuel kernel 100 comprises a combination of a refractory metal/alloy and fuel material. The refractory metal/alloy may comprise a zirconium alloy. The fuel material may comprise low enriched uranium (e.g., U235, U233), plutonium, or thorium combined with low enriched uranium as defined below and/or plutonium. As used herein, “low enriched uranium” means that the whole fuel material contains less than 20% by weight fissile material (e.g., uranium-235 or uranium-233). According to various embodiments, the uranium fuel material is enriched to between 1% and 20%, 5% and 20%, 10% and 20%, and/or 15% and 20% by weight of uranium-235. According to one or more embodiments, the fuel material comprises 19.7% enriched uranium-235.

According to various embodiments, the fuel material may comprise a 3-10%, 10-40%, 15-35%, and/or 20-30% volume fraction of the fuel kernel 100. According to various embodiments, the refractory metal may comprise a 60-99%, 60-97%, 70-97%, 60-90%, 65-85%, and/or 70-80% volume fraction of the fuel kernel 100. According to one or more embodiments, volume fractions within one or more of these ranges provide an alloy with beneficial properties as defined by the material phase diagram for the specified alloy composition. The fuel kernel 100 may comprise a Zr—U alloy that is a high-alloy fuel (i.e., relatively high concentration of the alloy constituent relative to the uranium constituent) comprised of either δ-phase UZr₂, or a combination of δ-phase UZr₂and α-phase Zr. According to one or more embodiments, the δ-phase of the U—Zr binary alloy system may range from a zirconium composition of approximately 65-81 volume percent (approximately 63 to 80 atom percent) of the fuel kernel 100. One or more of these embodiments have been found to result in low volumetric, irradiation-induced swelling of the fuel element 20. According to one or more such embodiments, fission gases are entrained within the metal kernel 100 itself, such that one or more embodiments of the fuel element 20 can omit a conventional gas gap from the fuel element 20. According to one or more embodiments, such swelling may be significantly less than would occur if low alloy (α-phase only) compositions were used (e.g., at least 10%, 20%, 30%, 50%, 75%, 100%, 200%, 300%, 500%, 1000%, 1200%, 1500%, or greater reduction in volume percent swelling per atom percent burnup than if a low alloy α-phase U-10Zr fuel was used). According to one or more embodiments of the present invention, irradiation-induced swelling of the fuel element 20 or kernel 100 thereof may be less than 20, 15, 10, 5, 4, 3, and/or 2 volume percent per atom percent burnup. According to one or more embodiments, swelling is expected to be around one volume percent per atom percent burnup.

According to one or more alternative embodiments of the present invention, the fuel kernel is replaced with a plutonium-zirconium binary alloy with the same or similar volume percentages as with the above-discussed U—Zr fuel kernels 100, or with different volume percentages than with the above-discussed U—Zr fuel kernels 100. For example, the plutonium fraction in the kernel 100 may be substantially less than a corresponding uranium fraction in a corresponding uranium-based kernel 100 because plutonium typically has about 60-70% weight fraction of fissile isotopes, while LEU uranium has 20% or less weight fraction of fissile U-235 isotopes. According to various embodiments, the plutonium volume fraction in the kernel 100 may be less than 15%, less than 10%, and/or less than 5%, with the volume fraction of the refractory metal being adjusted accordingly.

The use of a high-alloy kernel 100 according to one or more embodiments of the present invention may also result in the advantageous retention of fission gases during irradiation. Oxide fuels and low-alloy metal fuels typically exhibit significant fission gas release that is typically accommodated by the fuel design, usually with a plenum within the fuel rod to contain released fission gases. The fuel kernel 100 according to one or more embodiments of the present invention, in contrast, does not release fission gases. This is in part due to the low operating temperature of the fuel kernel 100 and the fact that fission gas atoms (specifically Xe and Kr) behave like solid fission products. Fission gas bubble formation and migration along grain boundaries to the exterior of the fuel kernel 100 does not occur according to one or more embodiments. At sufficiently high temperatures according to one or more embodiments, small (a few micron diameter) fission gas bubbles may form. However, these bubbles remain isolated within the fuel kernel 100 and do not form an interconnected network that would facilitate fission gas release, according to one or more embodiments of the present invention. The metallurgical bond between the fuel kernel 100 and cladding 120 may provide an additional barrier to fission gas release.

According to various embodiments, the fuel kernel 100 (or the cladding 120 or other suitable part of the fuel element 20) of one or more of the fuel elements 20 can be alloyed with a burnable poison such as gadolinium, boron, erbium or other suitable neutron absorbing material to form an integral burnable poison fuel element. Different fuel elements 20 within a fuel assembly 10 may utilize different burnable poisons and/or different amounts of burnable poison. For example, some of fuel elements 20 of a fuel assembly 10 (e.g., less than 75%, less than 50%, less than 20%, 1-15%, 1-12%, 2-12%, etc.) may include kernels 100 with 25, 20, and/or 15 weight percent or less Gd (e.g., 1-25 weight percent, 1-15 weight percent, 5-15 weight percent, etc.). Other fuel elements 20 of the fuel assembly 10 (e.g., 10-95%, 10-50%, 20-50%, a greater number of the fuel elements 20 than the fuel elements 20 that utilize Gd) may include kernels 100 with 10 or 5 weight percent or less Er (e.g., 0.1-10.0 weight percent, 0.1 to 5.0 weight percent etc.).

According to various embodiments, the burnable poison displaces the fuel material (rather than the refractory metal) relative to fuel elements 20 that do not include burnable poison in their kernels 100. For example, according to one embodiment of a fuel element 20 whose kernel 100 would otherwise include 65 volume percent zirconium and 35 volume percent uranium in the absence of a poison, the fuel element 20 includes a kernel 100 that is 16.5 volume percent Gd, 65 volume percent zirconium, and 18.5 volume percent uranium. According to one or more other embodiments, the burnable poison instead displaces the refractory metal, rather than the fuel material. According to one or more other embodiments, the burnable poison in the fuel kernel 100 displaces the refractory metal and the fuel material proportionally. Consequently, according to various of these embodiments, the burnable poison within the fuel kernel 100 may be disposed in the δ-phase of UZr₂or α-phase of Zr such that the presence of the burnable poison does not change the phase of the UZr₂alloy or Zr alloy in which the burnable poison is disposed.

Fuel elements 20 with a kernel 100 with a burnable poison may make up a portion (e.g., 0-100%, 1-99%, 1-50%, etc.) of the fuel elements 20 of one or more fuel assemblies 10 used in a reactor core. For example, fuel elements 20 with burnable poison may be positioned in strategic locations within the fuel assembly lattice of the assembly 10 that also includes fuel elements 20 without burnable poison to provide power distribution control and to reduce soluble boron concentrations early in the operating cycle. Similarly, select fuel assemblies 10 that include fuel elements 20 with burnable poison may be positioned in strategic locations within the reactor core relative to assemblies 10 that do not include fuel elements 20 with burnable poison to provide power distribution control and to reduce soluble boron concentrations early in the operating cycle. The use of such integral burnable absorbers may facilitate the design of extended operating cycles.

Alternatively and/or additionally, separate non-fuel bearing burnable poison rods may be included in the fuel assembly 10 (e.g., adjacent to fuel elements 20, in place of one or more fuel elements 20, inserted into guide tubes in fuel assemblies 10 that do not receive control rods, etc.). In one or more embodiments, such non-fuel burnable poison rods can be designed into a spider assembly similar to that which is used in the Babcock and Wilcox or Westinghouse designed reactors (referred to as burnable poison rod assemblies (BPRA)). These then may be inserted into the control rod guide tubes and locked into select fuel assemblies 10 where there are no control banks for the initial cycle of operation for reactivity control. When the burnable poison cluster is used it may be removed when the fuel assembly is relocated for the next fuel cycle. According to an alternative embodiment in which the separate non-fuel bearing burnable poison rods are positioned in place of one or more fuel elements 20, the non-fuel burnable poison rods remain in the fuel assembly 10 and are discharged along with other fuel elements 20 when the fuel assembly 10 reaches its usable life.

The fuel elements 20 are manufactured via powder-metallurgy co-extrusion. Typically, the powdered refractory metal and powdered metal fuel material (as well as the powdered burnable poison, if included in the kernel 100) for the fuel kernel 100 are mixed, the displacer 110 blank is positioned within the powder mixture, and then the combination of powder and displacer 110 is pressed and sintered into fuel core stock/billet (e.g., in a mold that is heated to varying extents over various time periods so as to sinter the mixture). The displacer 110 blank may have the same or similar cross-sectional shape as the ultimately formed displacer 110. Alternatively, the displacer 110 blank may have a shape that is designed to deform into the intended cross-sectional shape of the displacer 110 upon extrusion. The fuel core stock (including the displacer 110 and the sintered fuel kernel 100 material) is inserted into a hollow cladding 120 tube that has a sealed tube base and an opening on the other end. The opening on the other end is then sealed by an end plug made of the same material as the cladding to form a billet. The billet may be cylindrically shaped, or may have a shape that more closely resembles the ultimate cross-sectional shape of the element 20, for example, as shown in FIGS. 5 and 9. The billet is then co-extruded under temperature and pressure through a die set to create the element 20, including the finally shaped kernel 100, cladding 110, and displacer 120. According to various embodiments that utilize a non-cylindrical displacer 110, the billet may be properly oriented relative to the extrusion press die so that corners of the displacer 110 align with the lobes 20b of the fuel element 20. The extrusion process may be done by either direct extrusion (i.e., moving the billet through a stationary die) or indirect extrusion (i.e., moving the die toward a stationary billet). The process results in the cladding 120 being metallurgically bonded to the fuel kernel 100, which reduces the risk of delamination of the cladding 120 from the fuel kernel 100. The tube and end plug of the cladding 120 metallurgically bond to each other to seal the fuel kernel 100 within the cladding 120. The high melting points of refractory metals used in the fuel elements 10 tend to make powder metallurgy the method of choice for fabricating components from these metals.

According to one or more alternative embodiments, the fuel core stock of the fuel elements 20 may be manufactured via casting instead of sintering. Powdered or monolithic refractory metal and powdered or monolithic fuel material (as well as the powdered burnable poison, if included in the kernel 100) may be mixed, melted, and cast into a mold. The mold may create a displacer-blank-shaped void in the cast kernel 100 such that the displacer 110 blank may be inserted after the kernel 100 is cast, in the same manner that the cladding 120 is added to form the billet to be extruded. The remaining steps for manufacturing the fuel elements 20 may remain the same as or similar to the above-discuss embodiment that utilizes sintering instead of casting. Subsequent extrusion results in metallurgical bonding between the displacer 110 and kernel 100, as well as between the kernel 100 and cladding 120.

According to one or more alternative embodiments, the fuel elements 20 are manufactured using powdered ceramic fuel material instead of powdered metal fuel material. The remaining manufacturing steps may be the same as discussed above with respect to the embodiments using powdered metal fuel material. In various metal fuel embodiments and ceramic fuel embodiments, the manufacturing process may result in a fuel kernel 100 comprising fuel material disposed in a matrix of metal non-fuel material. In one or more of the metal fuel embodiments, the resulting fuel kernel 100 comprises a metal fuel alloy kernel comprising an alloy of the metal fuel material and the matrix of metal non-fuel material (e.g., a uranium-zirconium alloy). In one or more of the ceramic fuel embodiments, the kernel 100 comprises ceramic fuel material disposed in (e.g., interspersed throughout) the matrix of metal non-fuel material. According to various embodiments, the ceramic fuel material used in the manufacturing process may comprise powdered uranium or plutonium oxide, powdered uranium or plutonium nitride, powdered uranium or plutonium carbide, powdered uranium or plutonium hydride, or a combination thereof. In contrast with conventional UO₂fuel elements in which UO₂pellets are disposed in a tube, the manufacturing process according to one or more embodiments of the present invention results in ceramic fuel being disposed in a solid matrix of non-fuel material (e.g., a zirconium matrix).

As shown in FIG. 4, the axial coiling pitch of the spiral ribs 130 is selected according to the condition of placing the axes of adjacent fuel elements 10 with a spacing equal to the width across corners in the cross section of a fuel element and may be 5% to 20% of the fuel element 20 length. According to one embodiment, the pitch (i.e., the axial length over which a lobe/rib makes a complete rotation) is about 21.5 cm, while the full active length of the element 20 is about 420 cm. As shown in FIG. 3, stability of the vertical arrangement of the fuel elements 10 is provided: at the bottom—by the lower tie plate 70; at the top—by the upper tie plate 80; and relative to the height of the core—by the shroud 30. As shown in FIG. 1, the fuel elements 10 have a circumferential orientation such that the lobed profiles of any two adjacent fuel elements 10 have a common plane of symmetry which passes through the axes of the two adjacent fuel elements 10 in at least one cross section of the fuel element bundle.

As shown in FIG. 1, the helical twist of the fuel elements 20 in combination with their orientation ensures that there exists one or more self-spacing planes. As shown in FIG. 1, in such self spacing planes, the ribs of adjacent elements 20 contact each other to ensure proper spacing between such elements 20. Thus, the center-to-center spacing of elements 20 will be about the same as the corner-to-corner width of each element 20 (12.6 mm in the element illustrated in FIG. 5). Depending on the number of lobes 20b in each fuel element 20 and the relative geometrical arrangement of the fuel elements 20, all adjacent fuel elements 20 or only a portion of the adjacent fuel elements 20 will contact each other. For example, in the illustrated four-lobed embodiment, each fuel element 20 contacts all four adjacent fuel elements 20 at each self-spacing plane. However, in a three-lobed fuel element embodiment in which the fuel elements are arranged in a hexagonal pattern, each fuel element will only contact three of the six adjacent fuel elements in a given self-spacing plane. The three-lobed fuel element will contact the other three adjacent fuel elements in the next axially-spaced self-spacing plane (i.e., ⅙ of a turn offset from the previous self-spacing plane).

In an n-lobed element 20 in which n fuel elements are adjacent to a particular fuel element 20, a self-spacing plane will exist every 1/n helical turn (e.g., every ¼ helical turn for a four-lobed element 20 arranged in a square pattern such that four other fuel elements 20 are adjacent to the fuel element 20; every ⅓ helical turn for a three-lobed element in which three fuel elements are adjacent to the fuel element (i.e., every 120 degrees around the perimeter of the fuel element)). The pitch of the helix may be modified to create greater or fewer self-spacing planes over the axial length of the fuel elements 20. According to one embodiment, each four-lobed fuel element 20 includes multiple twists such that there are multiple self-spacing planes over the axial length of the bundle of fuel elements 20.

In the illustrated embodiment, all of the elements 20 twist in the same direction. However, according to an alternative embodiment, adjacent elements 20 may twist in opposite directions without deviating from the scope of the present invention.

The formula for the number of self-spacing planes along the fuel rod length is as follows:

N=n*L/h,

where:

L—Fuel rod length

n—Number of lobes (ribs) and the number of fuel elements adjacent to a fuel element

h—Helical twist pitch

The formula is slightly different if the number of lobes and the number of fuel elements adjacent to a fuel element are not the same.

As a result of such self-spacing, the fuel assembly 10 may omit spacer grids that may otherwise have been necessary to assure proper element spacing along the length of the assembly 10. By eliminating spacer grids, coolant may more freely flow through the assembly 10, which advantageously increases the heat transfer from the elements 20 to the coolant. However, according to alternative embodiments of the present invention, the assembly 10 may include spacer grid(s) without deviating from the scope of the present invention.

As shown in FIG. 3, the shroud 30 forms a tubular shell that extends axially along the entire length of the fuel elements 20 and surrounds the elements 20. However, according to an alternative embodiment of the present invention, the shroud 30 may comprise axially-spaced bands, each of which surrounds the fuel elements 20. One or more such bands may be axially aligned with the self-spacing planes. Axially extending corner supports may extend between such axially spaced bands to support the bands, maintain the bands' alignment, and strengthen the assembly. Alternatively and/or additionally, holes may be cut into the otherwise tubular/polygonal shroud 30 in places where the shroud 30 is not needed or desired for support. Use of a full shroud 30 may facilitate greater control of the separate coolant flows through each individual fuel assembly 10. Conversely, the use of bands or a shroud with holes may facilitate better coolant mixing between adjacent fuel assemblies 10, which may advantageously reduce coolant temperature gradients between adjacent fuel assemblies 10.

As shown in FIG. 1, the cross-sectional perimeter of the shroud 30 has a shape that accommodates the reactor in which the assembly 10 is used. In reactors such as the AP-1000 that utilize square fuel assemblies, the shroud has a square cross-section. However, the shroud 30 may alternatively take any suitable shape depending on the reactor in which it is used (e.g., a hexagonal shape for use in a VVER reactor (e.g., as shown in FIG. 1 of U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2009/0252278 A1).

The guide tubes 40 provide for the insertion of control absorber elements based on boron carbide (B₄C), silver indium cadmium (Ag, In, Cd), dysprosium titanate (Dy₂O₃.TiO₂) or other suitable alloys or materials used for reactivity control (not shown) and burnable absorber elements based on boron carbide, gadolinium oxide (Gd₂O₃) or other suitable materials (not shown) and are placed in the upper nozzle 50 with the capability of elastic axial displacement. The guide tubes 40 may comprise a zirconium alloy. For example, the guide tube 40 arrangement shown in FIG. 1 is in an arrangement used in the AP-1000 reactor (e.g., 24 guide tubes arranged in two annular rows at the positions shown in the 17×17 grid).

The shape, size, and features of the frame 25 depend on the specific reactor core for which the assembly 10 is to be used. Thus, one of ordinary skill in the art would understand how to make appropriately shaped and sized frame for the fuel assembly 10. For example, the frame 25 may be shaped and configured to fit into a reactor core of a conventional nuclear power plant in place of a conventional uranium oxide or mixed oxide fuel assembly for that plant's reactor core. The nuclear power plant may comprise a reactor core design that was in actual use before 2010 (e.g., 2, 3 or 4-loop PWRs; BWR-4). Alternatively, the nuclear power plant may be of an entirely new design that is specifically tailored for use with the fuel assembly 10.

As explained above, the illustrated fuel assembly 10 is designed for use in an AP-1000 or EPR reactor. The assembly includes a 17×17 array of fuel elements 20, 24 of which are replaced with guide tubes 40 as explained above for a total of 265 fuel elements 20 in EPR or 264 fuel elements 20 in AP-1000 (in the AP-1000, in addition to the 24 fuel elements being replaced with the guide tubes, a central fuel element is also replaced with an instrumented tube).

The elements 20 preferably provide 100% of the overall fissile material of the fuel assembly 10. Alternatively, some of the fissile material of the assembly 10 may be provided via fuel elements other than the elements 20 (e.g., non-lobed fuel elements, uranium oxide elements, elements having fuel ratios and/or enrichments that differ from the elements 20). According to various such alternative embodiments, the fuel elements 20 provide at least 50%, 60%, 70%, 75%, 80%, 85%, 90%, and/or 95% by volume of the overall fissile material of the fuel assembly 10.

Use of the metal fuel elements 20 according to one or more embodiments of the present invention facilitate various advantages over the uranium oxide or mixed oxide fuel conventionally used in light water nuclear reactors (LWR) (including boiling water reactors and pressurized water reactors) such as the Westinghouse-designed AP-1000, AREVA-designed EPR reactors, or GE-designed ABWR. For example, according to one or more embodiments, the power rating for an LWR operating on standard uranium oxide or mixed oxide fuel could be increased by up to about 30% by substituting the all-metal fuel elements 20 and/or fuel assembly 10 for standard uranium oxide fuel and fuel assemblies currently used in existing types of LWRs or new types of LWRs that have been proposed.

One of the key constraints for increasing power rating of LWRs operating on standard uranium oxide fuel has been the small surface area of cylindrical fuel elements that such fuel utilizes. A cylindrical fuel element has the lowest surface area to volume ratio for any type of fuel element cross-section profile. Another major constraint for standard uranium oxide fuel has been a relatively low burnup that such fuel elements could possibly reach while still meeting acceptable fuel performance criteria. As a result, these factors associated with standard uranium oxide or mixed oxide fuel significantly limit the degree to which existing reactor power rating could be increased.

One or more embodiments of the all-metal fuel elements 20 overcome the above limitations. For example, as explained above, the lack of spacer grids may reduce hydraulic resistance, and therefore increase coolant flow and heat flux from the elements 20 to the primary coolant. The helical twist of the fuel elements 20 may increase coolant intermixing and turbulence, which may also increase heat flux from the elements 20 to the coolant.

Preliminary neutronic and thermal-hydraulic analyses have shown the following according to one or more embodiments of the present invention:

- The thermal power rating of an LWR reactor could be increased by up to 30.7% or more (e.g., the thermal power rating of an EPR reactor could be increased from 4.59 GWth to 6.0 GWth).
- With a uranium volume fraction of 25% in the uranium-zirconium mixture and uranium-235 enrichment of 19.7%, an EPR reactor core with a four-lobe metallic fuel element 20 configuration could operate for about 500-520 effective full power days (EFPDs) at the increased thermal power rating of 6.0 GWth if 72 fuel assemblies were replaced per batch (once every 18 months) or 540-560 EFPDs if 80 fuel assemblies were replaced per batch (once every 18 months).
- Due to the increased surface area in the multi-lobe fuel element, even at the increased power rating of 6.0 GWth, the average surface heat flux of the multi-lobe fuel element is shown to be 4-5% lower than that for cylindrical uranium oxide fuel elements operating at the thermal power rating of 4.59 GWth. This could provide an increased safety margin with respect to critical heat flux (e.g., increased departure from nucleate boiling margin in PWRs or maximum fraction limiting critical power ratio in BWRs). Further, this could allow a possibility of using 12 fuel elements per assembly with burnable poisons. Burnable poisons could be used to remove excess reactivity at the beginning of cycle or to increase the Doppler Effect during the heat-up of the core.
- Thus, the fuel assemblies 10 may provide greater thermal power output at a lower fuel operating temperature than conventional uranium oxide or mixed oxide fuel assemblies.

To utilize the increased power output of the assembly 10, conventional power plants could be upgraded (e.g., larger and/or additional coolant pumps, steam generators, heat exchangers, pressurizers, turbines). Indeed, according to one or more embodiments, the upgrade could provide 30-40% more electricity from an existing reactor. Such a possibility may avoid the need to build a complete second reactor. The modification cost may quickly pay for itself via increased electrical output. Alternatively, new power plants could be constructed to include adequate features to handle and utilize the higher thermal output of the assemblies 10.

Further, one or more embodiments of the present invention could allow an LWR to operate at the same power rating as with standard uranium oxide or mixed oxide fuel using existing reactor systems without any major reactor modifications. For example, according to one embodiment:

- An EPR would have the same power output as if conventional uranium-oxide fuel were used: 4.59 GWt;
- With a uranium volume fraction of 25% in the uranium-zirconium mixture and uranium-235 enrichment of approximately 15%, an EPR reactor core with a four-lobe metallic fuel element 20 configuration could operate for about 500-520 effective full power days (EFPDs) if 72 fuel assemblies were replaced per batch or 540-560 EFPDs if 80 fuel assemblies were replaced per batch.
- The average surface heat flux for the elements 20 is reduced by approximately 30% compared to that for cylindrical rods with conventional uranium oxide fuel (e.g., 39.94 v. 57.34 W/cm²). Because the temperature rise of the coolant through the assembly 10 (e.g., the difference between the inlet and outlet temperature) and the coolant flow rate through the assembly 10 remain approximately the same relative to conventional fuel assemblies, the reduced average surface heat flux results in a corresponding reduction in the fuel rod surface temperature that contributes to increased safety margins with respect to critical heat flux (e.g., increased departure from nucleate boiling margin in PWRs or maximum fraction limiting critical power ratio in BWRs).

Additionally and/or alternatively, fuel assemblies 10 according to one or more embodiments of the present invention can be phased/laddered into a reactor core in place of conventional fuel assemblies. During the transition period, fuel assemblies 10 having comparable fissile/neutronic/thermal outputs as conventional fuel assemblies can gradually replace such conventional fuel assemblies over sequential fuel changes without changing the operating parameters of the power plant. Thus, fuel assemblies 10 can be retrofitted into an existing core that may be important during a transition period (i.e., start with a partial core with fuel assemblies 10 and gradually transition to a full core of fuel assemblies 10).

Moreover, the fissile loading of assemblies 10 can be tailored to the particular transition desired by a plant operator. For example, the fissile loading can be increased appropriately so as to increase the thermal output of the reactor by anywhere from 0% to 30% or more higher, relative to the use of conventional fuel assemblies that the assemblies 10 replace. Consequently, the power plant operator can chose the specific power uprate desired, based on the existing plant infrastructure or the capabilities of the power plant at various times during upgrades.

One or more embodiments of the fuel assemblies 10 and fuel elements 20 may be used in fast reactors (as opposed to light water reactors) without deviating from the scope of the present invention. In fast reactors, the non-fuel metal of the fuel kernel 100 is preferably a refractory metal, for example a molybdenum alloy (e.g., pure molybdenum or a combination of molybdenum and other metals), and the cladding 120 is preferably stainless steel (which includes any alloy variation thereof) or other material suitable for use with coolant in such reactors (e.g., sodium). Such fuel elements 20 may be manufactured via the above-discussed co-extrusion process or may be manufactured by any other suitable method (e.g., vacuum melt).

As shown in FIGS. 7A, 7B, and 8, fuel assemblies 510 accordingly to one or more embodiments of the present invention may be used in a pressurized heavy water reactor 500 (see FIG. 8) such as a CANDU reactor.

As shown in FIGS. 7A and 7B, the fuel assembly 510 comprises a plurality of fuel elements 20 mounted to a frame 520. The frame 520 comprises two end plates 520a, 520b that mount to opposite axial ends of the fuel elements 20 (e.g., via welding, interference fits, any of the various types of attachment methods described above for attaching the elements 20 to the lower tie plate 70). The elements 20 used in the fuel assembly 510 are typically much shorter than the elements 20 used in the assembly 10. According to various embodiments and reactors 500, the elements 20 and assemblies 510 used in the reactor 500 may be about 18 inches long.

The elements 20 may be positioned relative to each other in the assembly 510 so that self-spacing planes maintain spacing between the elements 20 in the manner described above with respect to the assembly 10. Alternatively, the elements 20 of the assembly 510 may be so spaced from each other that adjacent elements 20 never touch each other, and instead rely entirely on the frame 520 to maintain element 20 spacing. Additionally, spacers may be attached to the elements 20 or their ribs at various positions along the axial length of the elements 20 to contact adjacent elements 20 and help maintain element spacing 20 (e.g., in a manner similar to how spacers are used on conventional fuel rods of conventional fuel assemblies for pressurized heavy water reactors to help maintain rod spacing).

As shown in FIG. 8, the assemblies 510 are fed into calandria tubes 500a of the reactor 500 (sometimes referred to in the art as a calandria 500). The reactor 500 uses heavy water 500b as a moderator and primary coolant. The primary coolant 500b circulates horizontally through the tubes 500a and then to a heat exchanger where heat is transferred to a secondary coolant loop that is typically used to generate electricity via turbines. Fuel assembly loading mechanisms (not shown) are used to load fuel assemblies 510 into one side of the calandria tubes 500a and push spent assemblies 510 out of the opposite side of the tubes 500a, typically while the reactor 500 is operating.

The fuel assemblies 510 may be designed to be a direct substitute for conventional fuel assemblies (also known as fuel bundles in the art) for existing, conventional pressurized heavy water reactors (e.g., CANDU reactors). In such an embodiment, the assemblies 510 are fed into the reactor 500 in place of the conventional assemblies/bundles. Such fuel assemblies 510 may be designed to have neutronic/thermal properties similar to the conventional assemblies being replaced. Alternatively, the fuel assemblies 510 may be designed to provide a thermal power uprate. In such uprate embodiments, new or upgraded reactors 500 can be designed to accommodate the higher thermal output.

According to various embodiments of the present invention, the fuel assembly 10 is designed to replace a conventional fuel assembly of a conventional nuclear reactor. For example, the fuel assembly 10 illustrated in FIG. 1 is specifically designed to replace a conventional fuel assembly that utilizes a 17×17 array of UO₂fuel rods. If the guide tubes 40 of the assembly 10 are left in the exact same position as they would be for use with a conventional fuel assembly, and if all of the fuel elements 20 are the same size, then the pitch between fuel elements/rods remains unchanged between the conventional UO₂fuel assembly and one or more embodiments of the fuel assembly 10 (e.g., 12.6 mm pitch). In other words, the longitudinal axes of the fuel elements 20 may be disposed in the same locations as the longitudinal axes of conventional UO₂fuel rods would be in a comparable conventional fuel assembly. According to various embodiments, the fuel elements 20 may have a larger circumscribed diameter than the comparable UO₂fuel rods (e.g., 12.6 mm as compared to an outer diameter of 9.5 mm for a typical UO₂fuel rod). As a result, in the self-aligning plane illustrated in FIG. 1, the cross-sectional length and width of the space occupied by the fuel elements 20 may be slightly larger than that occupied by conventional UO₂fuel rods in a conventional fuel assembly (e.g., 214.2 mm for the fuel assembly 10 (i.e., 17 fuel elements 20×12.6 mm circumscribed diameter per fuel element), as opposed to 211.1 mm for a conventional UO₂fuel assembly that includes a 17×17 array of 9.5 mm UO₂fuel rods separated from each other by a 12.6 mm pitch). In conventional UO₂fuel assemblies, a spacer grid surrounds the fuel rods, and increases the overall cross-sectional envelope of the conventional fuel assembly to 214 mm×214 mm. In the fuel assembly 10, the shroud 30 similarly increases the cross-sectional envelope of the fuel assembly 10. The shroud 30 may be any suitable thickness (e.g., 0.5 mm or 1.0 mm thick). In an embodiment that utilizes a 1.0 mm thick shroud 30, the overall cross-sectional envelope of an embodiment of the fuel assembly 10 may be 216.2 mm×216.2 mm (e.g., the 214 mm occupied by the 17 12.6 mm diameter fuel elements 20 plus twice the 1.0 mm thickness of the shroud 30). As a result, according to one or more embodiments of the present invention, the fuel assembly 10 may be slightly larger (e.g., 216.2 mm×216.2 mm) than a typical UO₂fuel assembly (214 mm×214 mm). The larger size may impair the ability of the assembly 10 to properly fit into the fuel assembly positions of one or more conventional reactors, which were designed for use with conventional UO₂fuel assemblies. To accommodate this size change, according to one or more embodiments of the present invention, a new reactor may be designed and built to accommodate the larger size of the fuel assemblies 10.

According to an alternative embodiment of the present invention, the circumscribed diameter of all of the fuel elements 20 may be reduced slightly so as to reduce the overall cross-sectional size of the fuel assembly 10. For example, the circumscribed diameter of each fuel element 20 may be reduced by 0.13 mm to 12.47 mm, so that the overall cross-sectional space occupied by the fuel assembly 10 remains comparable to a conventional 214 mm by 214 mm fuel assembly (e.g., 17 12.47 mm diameter fuel elements 20 plus two 1.0 mm thickness of the shroud, which totals about 214 mm). Such a reduction in the size of the 17 by 17 array will slightly change the positions of the guide tubes 40 in the fuel assembly 10 relative to the guide tube positions in a conventional fuel assembly. To accommodate this slight position change in the tube 40 positions, the positions of the corresponding control rod array and control rod drive mechanisms in the reactor may be similarly shifted to accommodate the repositioned guide tubes 40. Alternatively, if sufficient clearances and tolerances are provided for the control rods in a conventional reactor, conventionally positioned control rods may adequately fit into the slightly shifted tubes 40 of the fuel assembly 10.

Alternatively, the diameter of the peripheral fuel elements 20 may be reduced slightly so that the overall assembly 10 fits into a conventional reactor designed for conventional fuel assemblies. For example, the circumscribed diameter of the outer row of fuel elements 20 may be reduced by 1.1 mm such that the total size of the fuel assembly is 214 mm×214 mm (e.g., 15 12.6 mm fuel elements 20 plus 2 11.5 mm fuel elements 20 plus 2 1.0 mm thicknesses of the shroud 30). Alternatively, the circumscribed diameter of the outer two rows of fuel elements 20 may be reduced by 0.55 mm each such that the total size of the fuel assembly remains 214 mm×214 mm (e.g., 13 12.6 mm fuel elements 20 plus 4 12.05 mm fuel assemblies plus 2 1.0 mm thicknesses of the shroud 30). In each embodiment, the pitch and position of the central 13×13 array of fuel elements 20 and guide tubes 40 remains unaltered such that the guide tubes 40 align with the control rod array and control rod drive mechanisms in a conventional reactor.

FIG. 10 illustrates a fuel assembly 610 according to an alternative embodiment of the present invention. According to various embodiments, the fuel assembly 610 is designed to replace a conventional UO₂fuel assembly in a conventional reactor while maintaining the control rod positioning of reactors designed for use with various conventional UO₂fuel assemblies. The fuel assembly 610 is generally similar to the fuel assembly 10, which is described above and illustrated in FIG. 1, but includes several differences that help the assembly 610 to better fit into one or more existing reactor types (e.g., reactors using Westinghouse's fuel assembly design that utilizes a 17 by 17 array of UO₂rods) without modifying the control rod positions or control rod drive mechanisms.

As shown in FIG. 10, the fuel assembly includes a 17 by 17 array of spaces. The central 15 by 15 array is occupied by 200 fuel elements 20 and 25 guide tubes 40, as described above with respect to the similar fuel assembly 10 illustrated in FIG. 1. Depending on the specific reactor design, the central guide tube 40 may be replaced by an additional fuel element 20 if the reactor design does not utilize a central tube 40 (i.e., 201 fuel elements 20 and 24 guide tubes 40). The guide tube 40 positions correspond to the guide tube positions used in reactors designed to use conventional UO₂fuel assemblies.

The peripheral positions (i.e., the positions disposed laterally outward from the fuel elements 20) of the 17 by 17 array/pattern of the fuel assembly 610 are occupied by 64 UO₂fuel elements/rods 650. As is known in the art, the fuel rods 650 may comprise standard UO₂pelletized fuel disposed in a hollow rod. The UO₂pelletized fuel may be enriched with U-235 by less than 20%, less than 15%, less than 10%, and/or less than 5%. The rods 650 may have a slightly smaller diameter (e.g., 9.50 mm) than the circumscribed diameter of the fuel elements 20, which slightly reduces the overall cross-sectional dimensions of the fuel assembly 610 so that the assembly 610 better fits into the space allocated for a conventional UO₂fuel assembly.

In the illustrated embodiment, the fuel rods/elements 650 comprise UO₂pelletized fuel. However, the fuel rods/elements 650 may alternatively utilize any other suitable combination of one or more fissile and/or fertile materials (e.g., thorium, plutonium, uranium-235, uranium-233, any combinations thereof). Such fuel rods/elements 650 may comprise metal and/or oxide fuel.

According to one or more alternative embodiments, the fuel rods 650 may occupy less than all of the 64 peripheral positions. For example, the fuel rods 650 may occupy the top row and left column of the periphery, while the bottom row and right column of the periphery may be occupied by fuel elements 20. Alternatively, the fuel rods 650 may occupy any other two sides of the periphery of the fuel assembly. The shroud 630 may be modified so as to enclose the additional fuel elements 20 in the periphery of the fuel assembly. Such modified fuel assemblies may be positioned adjacent each other such that a row/column of peripheral fuel elements 650 in one assembly is always adjacent to a row/column of fuel elements 20 in the adjacent fuel assembly. As a result, additional space for the fuel assemblies is provided by the fact that the interface between adjacent assemblies is shifted slightly toward the assembly that includes fuel elements 650 in the peripheral, interface side. Such a modification may provide for the use of a greater number of higher heat output fuel elements 20 than is provided by the fuel assemblies 610.

A shroud 630 surrounds the array of fuel elements 20 and separates the elements 20 from the elements 650. The nozzles 50, 60, shroud 630, coolant passages formed therebetween, relative pressure drops through the elements 20 and elements 650, and/or the increased pressure drop through the spacer grid 660 (discussed below) surrounding the elements 650 may result in a higher coolant flow rate within the shroud 630 and past the higher heat output fuel elements 20 than the flow rate outside of the shroud 630 and past the relatively lower heat output fuel rods 650. The passageways and/or orifices therein may be designed to optimize the relative coolant flow rates past the elements 20, 650 based on their respective heat outputs and designed operating temperatures.

According to various embodiments, the moderator:fuel ratio for the fuel elements 20 of the fuel assembly 610 is less than or equal to 2.7, 2.6, 2.5, 2.4, 2.3, 2.2, 2.1, 2.0, 1.9, and/or 1.8. In the illustrated embodiment, the moderator:fuel ratio equals a ratio of (1) the total area within the shroud 630 available for coolant/moderator (e.g., approximated by the total cross-sectional area within the shroud 630 minus the total cross-sectional area taken up by the fuel elements 20 (assuming the guide tubes 40 are filled with coolant)) to (2) the total cross-sectional area of the kernels 100 of the fuel elements 20 within the shroud 630.

According to an alternative embodiment of the invention, the shroud 630 may be replaced with one or more annular bands or may be provided with holes in the shroud 630, as explained above. The use of bands or holes in the shroud 630 may facilitate cross-mixing of coolant between the fuel elements 20 and the fuel elements 650.

As shown in FIG. 10, the fuel elements 650 are disposed within an annular spacer grid 660 that is generally comparable to the outer part of a spacer grid used in a conventional UO₂fuel assembly. The spacer grid 660 may rigidly connect to the shroud 630 (e.g., via welds, bolts, screws, or other fasteners). The spacer grid 660 is preferably sized so as to provide the same pitch between the fuel elements 650 and the fuel elements 20 as is provided between the central fuel elements 20 (e.g., 12.6 mm pitch between axes of all fuel elements 20, 650). To provide such spacing, the fuel elements 650 may be disposed closer to the outer side of the spacer grid 660 than to the shroud 630 and inner side of the spacer grid 660. The fuel assembly 610 and spacer grid 660 are also preferably sized and positioned such that the same pitch is provided between fuel elements 650 of adjacent fuel assemblies (e.g., 12.6 mm pitch). However, the spacing between any of the fuel elements 20, 650 may vary relative to the spacing between other fuel elements 20, 650 without deviating from the scope of the present invention.

According to various embodiments, the fuel elements 20 provide at least 60%, 65%, 70%, 75%, and/or 80% of a total volume of all fissile-material-containing fuel elements 20, 650 of the fuel assembly 610. For example, according to one or more embodiments in which the fuel assembly 610 includes 201 fuel elements 20, each having a cross-sectional area of about 70 mm², and 64 fuel elements 650, each having a 9.5 mm diameter, the fuel elements 20 provide about 75.6% of a total volume of all fuel elements 20, 650 (201 fuel elements 20×70 mm²equals 14070 mm²; 64 fuel elements 650×π×(9.5/2)²=4534 mm²; fuel element 20, 650 areas are essentially proportional to fuel element volumes; (14070 mm²/(14070 mm²+4534 mm²)=75.6%)).

The height of the fuel assembly 610 matches a height of a comparable conventional fuel assembly that the assembly 610 can replace (e.g., the height of a standard fuel assembly for a Westinghouse or AREVA reactor design).

The illustrated fuel assembly 610 may be used in a 17×17 PWR such as the Westinghouse 4-loop design, AP1000, or AREVA EPR. However, the design of the fuel assembly 610 may also be modified to accommodate a variety of other reactor designs (e.g., reactor designs that utilize a hexagonal fuel assembly, in which case the outer periphery of the hexagon is occupied by UO₂rods, while the inner positions are occupied by fuel elements 20, or boiling water reactors, or small modular reactors). While particular dimensions are described with regard to particular embodiments, a variety of alternatively dimensioned fuel elements 20, 650 and fuel assemblies 10 may be used in connection with a variety of reactors or reactor types without deviating from the scope of the present invention.

Depending on the specific reactor design, additional rod positions of a fuel assembly may be replaced with UO₂rods. For example, while the fuel assembly 610 includes UO₂rods only in the outer peripheral row, the assembly 610 could alternatively include UO₂rods in the outer two rows without deviating from the scope of the present invention.

According to various embodiments, the portion of the fuel assembly 610 that supports the fuel elements 650 is inseparable from the portion of the fuel assembly 610 that supports the fuel elements 20. According to various embodiments, the fuel elements 20 are not separable as a unit from the fuel elements 650 of the fuel assembly 610 (even though individual fuel elements 20, 650 may be removed from the assembly 610, for example, based on individual fuel element failure). Similarly, there is not a locking mechanism that selectively locks the fuel element 650 portion of the fuel assembly to the fuel element 20 portion of the fuel assembly 610. According to various embodiments, the fuel elements 20 and fuel elements 650 of the fuel assembly 610 have the same designed life cycle, such that the entire fuel assembly 610 is used within the reactor, and then removed as a single spent unit.

According to various embodiments, the increased heat output of the fuel elements 20 within the fuel assembly 610 can provide a power uprate relative to the conventional all UO₂fuel rod assembly that the assembly 610 replaces. According to various embodiments, the power uprate is at least 5%, 10%, and/or 15%. The uprate may be between 1 and 30%, 5 and 25%, and/or 10 and 20% according to various embodiments. According to various embodiments, the fuel assembly 610 provides at least an 18-month fuel cycle, but may also facilitate moving to a 24+ or 36+ month fuel cycle. According to an embodiment of the fuel assembly 610, which uses fuel elements 20 having the example parameters discussed above with respect to the element 20 shown in FIG. 10, the assembly 17 provides a 17% uprate relative to a conventional UO₂fuel assembly under the operating parameters identified in the below tables.

Operating Parameter for AREVA EPR Reactor
Value
Unit

Reactor power
5.37
GWt

Fuel cycle length
18
months

Reload batch size
⅓
core

Enrichment of Fuel Element 20
≤19.7
w/o

Enrichment of UO₂of the Rods 650
≤5
w/o

Coolant flow rate
117%
rv

* rv = reference value

Fuel Assembly Parameter
Value
Unit

Fuel assembly design
17 × 17

Fuel assembly pitch
215
mm

Fuel assembly envelope
214
mm

Active fuel height
4200
mm

Number of fuel rods
265

Fuel element 20 pitch (i.e., axis to axis spacing)
12.6
mm

Average outer fuel element 20 diameter
12.6
mm

(circumscribed diameter)

Average minimum fuel element 20 diameter
10.44
mm

Moderator to fuel ratio, seed region (around
2.36

elements 20)

Moderator to fuel ratio, blanket (around the fuel rods
1.9

650)

The fuel assemblies 10, 510, 610 are preferably thermodynamically designed for and physically shaped for use in a land-based nuclear power reactor 90, 500 (e.g., land-based LWRS (including BWRs and PWRs), land-based fast reactors, land-based heavy water reactors) that is designed to generate electricity and/or heat that is used for a purpose other than electricity (e.g., desalinization, chemical processing, steam generation, etc.). Such land-based nuclear power reactors 90 include, among others, VVER, AP-1000, EPR, APR-1400, ABWR, BWR-6, CANDU, BN-600, BN-800, Toshiba 4S, Monju, etc. However, according to alternative embodiments of the present invention, the fuel assemblies 10, 510, 610 may be designed for use in and used in marine-based nuclear reactors (e.g., ship or submarine power plants; floating power plants designed to generate power (e.g., electricity) for onshore use) or other nuclear reactor applications.

The foregoing illustrated embodiments are provided to illustrate the structural and functional principles of the present invention and are not intended to be limiting. To the contrary, the principles of the present invention are intended to encompass any and all changes, alterations and/or substitutions within the spirit and scope of the following claims.

Claims

1. A fuel assembly for use in a core of a nuclear power reactor, the assembly comprising: a frame comprising a lower nozzle that is shaped and configured to mount to an internal core structure of the nuclear power reactor; anda plurality of elongated, extruded fuel elements supported by the frame, each of said plurality of fuel elements comprising a fuel kernel comprising fuel material disposed in a matrix of metal non-fuel material, the fuel material comprising fissile material, anda cladding surrounding the fuel kernel,wherein a moderator: fuel ratio in a region of the fuel elements is 2.4 or less,wherein the moderator: fuel ratio is an area ratio within a cross-section that is perpendicular to longitudinal axes of the plurality of fuel elements and extends through the plurality of fuel elements, the area ratio is a ratio is of: (1) a total area available for moderator flow for the plurality of fuel elements to (2) a total area of the fuel kernels of the plurality of fuel elements; andwherein a plurality of said plurality of fuel elements each has a spirally twisted, multi-lobed profile that defines a plurality of spiral ribs.
2. The fuel assembly of claim 1, wherein: the plurality of elongated, extruded fuel elements comprise a plurality of elongated, extruded metal fuel elements;the fuel material comprises metal fuel material; andthe fuel kernel comprises a metal fuel alloy kernel comprising an alloy of the metal fuel material and the matrix of metal non-fuel material.
3. The fuel assembly of claim 2, wherein the kernel comprises δ-phase UZr2.
4. The fuel assembly of claim 1, wherein the fuel material comprises ceramic fuel material disposed in the matrix of metal non-fuel material.
5. The fuel assembly of claim 1, wherein the plurality of elongated fuel elements provide at least 60% of a total volume of all fuel elements of the fuel assembly.
6. The fuel assembly of claim 1, wherein an average thickness of the cladding is at least 0.6 mm.
7. The fuel assembly of claim 1, wherein the fuel assembly is thermodynamically designed and physically shaped for operation in a land-based nuclear power reactor.
8. A land-based nuclear power reactor comprising the fuel assembly of claim 7.
9. The fuel assembly of claim 7, wherein: the land-based nuclear power reactor comprises a conventional nuclear power plant having a reactor design that was in actual use before 2010; andthe frame is shaped and configured to fit into the land-based nuclear power reactor in place of a conventional uranium oxide fuel assembly for said reactor.
10. The fuel assembly of claim 1, wherein the respective fuel kernels of the plurality of fuel elements are formed via sintering of the fuel material and metal non-fuel material.
11. The fuel assembly of claim 1, wherein, with respect to a plurality of said plurality of fuel elements: the fuel material of the fuel kernel is enriched to 20% or less by uranium-235 and/or uranium-233 and comprises between a 20% and 30% volume fraction of the fuel kernel; andthe metal non-fuel material of the fuel kernel comprises between a 70% and 80% volume fraction of the fuel kernel.
12. The fuel assembly of claim 11, wherein, with respect to the plurality of said plurality of fuel elements, the fuel material enrichment is between 15% and 20%.
13. The fuel assembly of claim 11, wherein, with respect to the plurality of said plurality of fuel elements, the metal non-fuel material of the fuel kernel comprises zirconium.
14. The fuel assembly of claim 1, wherein, with respect to a plurality of said plurality of fuel elements: the fuel material of the fuel kernel comprises plutonium;the metal non-fuel material of the fuel kernel comprises zirconium; andthe metal non-fuel material of the fuel kernel comprises between a 70% and 97% volume fraction of the fuel kernel.
15. The fuel assembly of claim 1, wherein the fuel material comprises a combination of: uranium and thorium; plutonium and thorium; or uranium, plutonium, and thorium.
16. The fuel assembly of claim 1, wherein the cladding of a plurality of said plurality of fuel elements is metallurgically bonded to the fuel kernel.
17. The fuel assembly of claim 1, wherein the metal non-fuel material of a plurality of said plurality of fuel elements comprises aluminum.
18. The fuel assembly of claim 1, wherein the metal non-fuel-material of a plurality of said plurality of fuel elements comprises a refractory metal.
19. The fuel assembly of claim 1, wherein the cladding of a plurality of said plurality of fuel elements comprises zirconium.
20. The fuel assembly of claim 1, wherein the spiral ribs of adjacent ones of said plurality of fuel elements periodically contact each other over the axial length of the fuel elements, such contact helping to maintain the spacing of the fuel elements relative to each other.
21. The fuel assembly of claim 1, wherein the multi-lobed profile comprises concave areas between adjacent lobes.
22. The fuel assembly of claim 1, wherein: the multi-lobed profile comprises lobe tips and intersections between adjacent lobes, and with respect to said plurality of said plurality of fuel elements, the cladding is thicker at the tips than at the intersections.
23. The fuel assembly of claim 1, wherein the fuel assembly comprises a burnable poison.
24. The fuel assembly of claim 23, wherein at least one of the plurality of elongated fuel elements comprises the burnable poison.
25. The fuel assembly of claim 1, further comprising a plurality of UO2 fuel elements supported by the frame, each of said plurality of UO2 fuel elements comprising UO2 fuel.
26. The fuel assembly of claim 25, wherein at least some of the plurality of elongated UO2 fuel elements are positioned laterally outwardly from the plurality of elongated fuel elements.
27. The fuel assembly of claim 26, further comprising a shroud that separates coolant flow past the plurality of elongated UO2 fuel elements from coolant flow past the plurality of elongated fuel elements.
28. The fuel assembly of claim 25, wherein the UO2 fuel has less than 15% U-235 enrichment.

CROSS REFERENCE

This application is a U.S. National Stage application under 35 USC § 371 of PCT/US2011/036034 filed 11 May 2011, which claims priority benefit under the Paris Convention from U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/333,467, filed May 11, 2010, U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/393,499, filed Oct. 15, 2010, and U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/444,990, filed Feb. 21, 2011, all three of which are titled “METAL FUEL ASSEMBLY,” the entire contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference herein.

PCT Information

Filing Document	Filing Date	Country	Kind	371c Date
PCT/US2011/036034	5/11/2011	WO	00	6/3/2013

Publishing Document	Publishing Date	Country	Kind
WO2011/143293	11/17/2011	WO	A

US Referenced Citations (425)

Number	Name	Date	Kind
2780517	Fontana	Feb 1957	A
2879216	Horwitz	Mar 1959	A
2887357	Seaberg	May 1959	A
2894827	Hyde	Jul 1959	A
2898185	Boyd	Aug 1959	A
2977297	Evans	Mar 1961	A
2987458	Breden	Jun 1961	A
3030291	Butter et al.	Apr 1962	A
3034975	Beurtheret	May 1962	A
3046088	Horn	Jul 1962	A
3063925	Huet	Nov 1962	A
3070527	Hurford et al.	Dec 1962	A
3088900	Hurford et al.	May 1963	A
3096264	Bauer	Jul 1963	A
3105035	Bauer	Sep 1963	A
3133867	Weems	May 1964	A
3154471	Frisch	Oct 1964	A
3177123	Huet	Apr 1965	A
3197376	Balent et al.	Jul 1965	A
3197383	Maillet	Jul 1965	A
3208912	Jaye et al.	Sep 1965	A
3219535	Robbins	Nov 1965	A
3252867	Conley	May 1966	A
3275564	Pascard	Sep 1966	A
3282335	De Haller	Nov 1966	A
3285825	Jens	Nov 1966	A
3297544	Hooper	Jan 1967	A
3308031	Pan	Mar 1967	A
3308033	Alfille	Mar 1967	A
3309277	Jaye	Mar 1967	A
3322644	Benson	May 1967	A
3335060	Diener	Aug 1967	A
3339631	McGurty	Sep 1967	A
3361640	Hassig	Jan 1968	A
3366547	Gumuchian	Jan 1968	A
3378453	Gorker	Apr 1968	A
3394049	Jones	Jul 1968	A
3486973	Georges	Dec 1969	A
3546068	Schluderberg	Dec 1970	A
3567582	Van Dievoet	Mar 1971	A
3577225	Schaffer	May 1971	A
3640844	Shank et al.	Feb 1972	A
3660227	Ackroyd et al.	May 1972	A
3660228	Magladry	May 1972	A
3671392	Beaudoin	Jun 1972	A
3687805	Desbois	Aug 1972	A
3714322	Bell et al.	Jan 1973	A
3736227	Nakazato	May 1973	A
3801734	West	Apr 1974	A
3814667	Klumb	Jun 1974	A
3847736	Bevilacqua	Nov 1974	A
3853703	Anthony et al.	Dec 1974	A
3859165	Radkowsky et al.	Jan 1975	A
3956147	Becker et al.	May 1976	A
3957575	Fauth, Jr. et al.	May 1976	A
T947011	Radkowsky	Jun 1976	I4
3960655	Bohanan et al.	Jun 1976	A
3971575	Lesham et al.	Jul 1976	A
3998692	Bohanan et al.	Dec 1976	A
4020131	Feraday	Apr 1977	A
4029740	Ervin, Jr.	Jun 1977	A
4059539	Potter et al.	Nov 1977	A
4072564	Jabsen	Feb 1978	A
4077835	Bishop et al.	Mar 1978	A
4078967	Anthony	Mar 1978	A
4111348	Laird et al.	Sep 1978	A
4119563	Kadner et al.	Oct 1978	A
4192716	Anthony	Mar 1980	A
4193953	Langen et al.	Mar 1980	A
4194948	Ledin	Mar 1980	A
4202793	Bezzi et al.	May 1980	A
4235669	Burgess et al.	Nov 1980	A
4268357	Formanek et al.	May 1981	A
4273613	Radkowsky	Jun 1981	A
4278501	Steinke	Jul 1981	A
4285771	Downs	Aug 1981	A
4292278	Elikan et al.	Sep 1981	A
4298434	Anthony et al.	Nov 1981	A
4304631	Walton et al.	Dec 1981	A
4309251	Anthony et al.	Jan 1982	A
4320093	Volesky et al.	Mar 1982	A
4324618	Schluderberg	Apr 1982	A
4344912	Rampolla	Aug 1982	A
4381284	Gjertsen	Apr 1983	A
4393510	Lang et al.	Jul 1983	A
RE31583	Klumb et al.	May 1984	E
4450016	Vesterlund et al.	May 1984	A
4450020	Vesterlund	May 1984	A
4474398	Tolino et al.	Oct 1984	A
4495136	Camden, Jr. et al.	Jan 1985	A
4499047	Borrman et al.	Feb 1985	A
4507259	Cowell et al.	Mar 1985	A
4508679	Matzner et al.	Apr 1985	A
4540545	Kondo	Sep 1985	A
4544522	Curulla et al.	Oct 1985	A
4551300	Feutrel	Nov 1985	A
4560532	Barry et al.	Dec 1985	A
4572816	Gjertsen et al.	Feb 1986	A
4578240	Cadwell	Mar 1986	A
4579711	Mishima et al.	Apr 1986	A
4584167	Carelli	Apr 1986	A
4587078	Azekura et al.	May 1986	A
4589929	Steinberg	May 1986	A
4615862	Huckestein	Oct 1986	A
4645642	Leclercq et al.	Feb 1987	A
4652425	Ferrari et al.	Mar 1987	A
4659538	Leclercq	Apr 1987	A
4664880	Bryan	May 1987	A
4666664	Doshi	May 1987	A
4670213	Wilson et al.	Jun 1987	A
4671924	Gjertsen et al.	Jun 1987	A
4671927	Alsop	Jun 1987	A
4678619	Radkowsky	Jul 1987	A
4678627	Rylatt	Jul 1987	A
4678632	Ferrari	Jul 1987	A
4680443	Vere et al.	Jul 1987	A
4684495	Wilson et al.	Aug 1987	A
4684503	Shallenberger	Aug 1987	A
4692304	Gjertsen	Sep 1987	A
4699758	Shallenberger et al.	Oct 1987	A
4699761	Gjertsen et al.	Oct 1987	A
4702883	Wilson et al.	Oct 1987	A
4716015	Carlson	Dec 1987	A
4746488	Pradal et al.	May 1988	A
4749519	Koehly et al.	Jun 1988	A
4749544	Crowther et al.	Jun 1988	A
4762676	Gjertsen et al.	Aug 1988	A
4765909	Rourke et al.	Aug 1988	A
4818474	Malhouitre et al.	Apr 1989	A
4820473	Ohashi et al.	Apr 1989	A
4828792	Leclercq et al.	May 1989	A
4832905	Bryan et al.	May 1989	A
4842814	Takase et al.	Jun 1989	A
4859400	Curzon	Aug 1989	A
4879086	Luce et al.	Nov 1989	A
4880607	Horton et al.	Nov 1989	A
4900507	Shallenberger et al.	Feb 1990	A
4918710	Bard	Apr 1990	A
4938921	Mardon et al.	Jul 1990	A
4942016	Marlowe et al.	Jul 1990	A
4954293	Cailly et al.	Sep 1990	A
4957695	Rudolph	Sep 1990	A
4968476	Radkowsky	Nov 1990	A
4986957	Taylor	Jan 1991	A
4986960	Larson	Jan 1991	A
4997596	Proebstle et al.	Mar 1991	A
5002726	Johansson	Mar 1991	A
5009837	Nguyen et al.	Apr 1991	A
5009839	King	Apr 1991	A
5019327	Fanning et al.	May 1991	A
5019333	Isobe et al.	May 1991	A
5024426	Busch et al.	Jun 1991	A
5024807	Hatfield et al.	Jun 1991	A
5024809	Taylor	Jun 1991	A
5024810	Bachman	Jun 1991	A
5026516	Taylor	Jun 1991	A
5030412	Yates et al.	Jul 1991	A
5032351	Johansson	Jul 1991	A
5035869	Furuya	Jul 1991	A
5037605	Riordan	Aug 1991	A
5053191	Bryan et al.	Oct 1991	A
5069864	Johansson	Dec 1991	A
5073336	Taylor	Dec 1991	A
5085827	Johansson et al.	Feb 1992	A
5089210	Reese et al.	Feb 1992	A
5089220	Nylund	Feb 1992	A
5089221	Johansson et al.	Feb 1992	A
5091145	Petit	Feb 1992	A
5093075	Chevereau et al.	Mar 1992	A
5094802	Riordan, III	Mar 1992	A
5110539	Perrotti et al.	May 1992	A
5112571	Orii et al.	May 1992	A
5128097	Fukasawa et al.	Jul 1992	A
5135710	Grattier et al.	Aug 1992	A
5135728	Karraker	Aug 1992	A
5136619	Capossela et al.	Aug 1992	A
5141701	Bryan	Aug 1992	A
5147597	Roofthooft et al.	Sep 1992	A
5147600	Kadono et al.	Sep 1992	A
5149491	Congdon et al.	Sep 1992	A
5164050	Bertaud et al.	Nov 1992	A
5183629	Canat et al.	Feb 1993	A
5186891	Johansson et al.	Feb 1993	A
5188797	Bryan	Feb 1993	A
5192495	Caldwell et al.	Mar 1993	A
5194216	McDaniels, Jr.	Mar 1993	A
5200142	DeMario et al.	Apr 1993	A
5202085	Aoyama et al.	Apr 1993	A
5209899	Johansson et al.	May 1993	A
5211908	Verdier	May 1993	A
5219519	Matzner	Jun 1993	A
5221515	Thiebaut et al.	Jun 1993	A
5223211	Inagaki et al.	Jun 1993	A
5241570	Challberg	Aug 1993	A
5243635	Bryan	Sep 1993	A
5247550	Perkins et al.	Sep 1993	A
5259009	Patterson et al.	Nov 1993	A
5259010	Brown et al.	Nov 1993	A
5263071	Farkas et al.	Nov 1993	A
5265139	Yanagi et al.	Nov 1993	A
5267291	Matzner et al.	Nov 1993	A
5271053	Bryan	Dec 1993	A
5272741	Masuhara et al.	Dec 1993	A
5272742	Attix et al.	Dec 1993	A
5274685	Yates	Dec 1993	A
5276721	Beuerlein	Jan 1994	A
5278882	Garde et al.	Jan 1994	A
5278883	Patterson et al.	Jan 1994	A
5282231	Adams et al.	Jan 1994	A
5283812	Verdier	Feb 1994	A
5283821	Karoutas	Feb 1994	A
5286946	Will	Feb 1994	A
5289514	Lippert et al.	Feb 1994	A
5297176	Altman et al.	Mar 1994	A
5297177	Inagaki et al.	Mar 1994	A
5299246	Bryan	Mar 1994	A
5301218	Taylor, Jr. et al.	Apr 1994	A
5307393	Hatfield	Apr 1994	A
5328524	Hertz	Jul 1994	A
5340447	Bertaud et al.	Aug 1994	A
5341407	Rosenbaum et al.	Aug 1994	A
5345483	Johansson et al.	Sep 1994	A
5347560	Lippert et al.	Sep 1994	A
5349618	Greenspan	Sep 1994	A
5373541	Mardon et al.	Dec 1994	A
5375154	Matzner et al.	Dec 1994	A
5377246	Taylor, Jr. et al.	Dec 1994	A
5383228	Armijo et al.	Jan 1995	A
5384814	Matzner et al.	Jan 1995	A
5386439	Leroy et al.	Jan 1995	A
5386440	Kashiwai et al.	Jan 1995	A
5390220	Zuloaga, Jr. et al.	Feb 1995	A
5390221	Dix et al.	Feb 1995	A
5390222	Rau et al.	Feb 1995	A
5403565	Delloye et al.	Apr 1995	A
5404383	Nylund	Apr 1995	A
5417780	Adamson et al.	May 1995	A
5420901	Johansson	May 1995	A
5420902	Dressel et al.	May 1995	A
5434897	Davies	Jul 1995	A
5434898	Barkhurst	Jul 1995	A
5436946	Curulla et al.	Jul 1995	A
5436947	Taylor	Jul 1995	A
5437747	Adamson et al.	Aug 1995	A
5438598	Attix	Aug 1995	A
5440599	Rodack et al.	Aug 1995	A
5444748	Beuchel et al.	Aug 1995	A
5452334	Reparaz et al.	Sep 1995	A
5469481	Adamson et al.	Nov 1995	A
5473650	Johansson	Dec 1995	A
5481577	Yates et al.	Jan 1996	A
5481578	Matzner	Jan 1996	A
5483564	Matzner et al.	Jan 1996	A
5488634	Johansson et al.	Jan 1996	A
5488644	Johansson	Jan 1996	A
5490189	Schechter	Feb 1996	A
5490190	Hopkins et al.	Feb 1996	A
5517540	Marlowe et al.	May 1996	A
5517541	Rosenbaum et al.	May 1996	A
5519745	Proebstle et al.	May 1996	A
5519746	Dalke et al.	May 1996	A
5519748	Adamson et al.	May 1996	A
5524032	Adamson et al.	Jun 1996	A
5526387	Johansson et al.	Jun 1996	A
5528640	Johansson et al.	Jun 1996	A
5530729	Gustafsson	Jun 1996	A
5538701	Avens et al.	Jul 1996	A
5539791	Garzarolli et al.	Jul 1996	A
5539792	Buttner et al.	Jul 1996	A
5539793	Johansson et al.	Jul 1996	A
5546437	Matzner et al.	Aug 1996	A
5572560	Brown	Nov 1996	A
5577081	Yaginuma	Nov 1996	A
5578145	Adamson et al.	Nov 1996	A
5596615	Nakamura et al.	Jan 1997	A
5600694	Broders	Feb 1997	A
5606724	Wai et al.	Feb 1997	A
5609697	Moinard et al.	Mar 1997	A
5618356	Adamson et al.	Apr 1997	A
5620536	Dahlb ack	Apr 1997	A
5622574	Charquet	Apr 1997	A
5648995	Mardon et al.	Jul 1997	A
5666389	Andersson et al.	Sep 1997	A
5674330	Charquet et al.	Oct 1997	A
5675621	Croteau et al.	Oct 1997	A
5681404	Adamson et al.	Oct 1997	A
5699396	Taylor	Dec 1997	A
5702544	Mardon et al.	Dec 1997	A
5711826	Nordstrom	Jan 1998	A
5726418	Duthoo	Mar 1998	A
5727039	Harmon et al.	Mar 1998	A
5732116	Petit	Mar 1998	A
5737375	Radkowsky	Apr 1998	A
5740218	Frederickson et al.	Apr 1998	A
5748694	King	May 1998	A
5768332	Van Swam	Jun 1998	A
5774514	Rubbia	Jun 1998	A
5774517	Palavecino et al.	Jun 1998	A
5778035	Nylund	Jul 1998	A
5787142	Van Swam	Jul 1998	A
5805657	Heubeck	Sep 1998	A
5808271	Duthoo	Sep 1998	A
5826163	Saraceno et al.	Oct 1998	A
5832050	Rebeyrolle et al.	Nov 1998	A
5838753	Van Swam et al.	Nov 1998	A
5844957	Johannesson et al.	Dec 1998	A
5852645	Romary et al.	Dec 1998	A
5854818	Van Swam et al.	Dec 1998	A
5859887	Richards	Jan 1999	A
5864593	Radkowsky	Jan 1999	A
5878100	Johannesson et al.	Mar 1999	A
5892807	Van Swam	Apr 1999	A
5901193	Dahlback et al.	May 1999	A
5926517	Van Swam	Jul 1999	A
5940464	Mardon et al.	Aug 1999	A
5949837	Radkowsky	Sep 1999	A
5949839	Nylund	Sep 1999	A
6002735	Van Swam	Dec 1999	A
6010671	Kimura	Jan 2000	A
6026136	Radkowsky	Feb 2000	A
6033493	Hertz et al.	Mar 2000	A
6088420	Yokoyama et al.	Jul 2000	A
6110437	Schall et al.	Aug 2000	A
6130927	Kang et al.	Oct 2000	A
6167105	Yoon et al.	Dec 2000	A
6192098	Van Swam	Feb 2001	B1
6205196	Yamashita et al.	Mar 2001	B1
6226342	Micko et al.	May 2001	B1
6228337	Ioffe	May 2001	B1
6229868	Nylund et al.	May 2001	B1
6236701	Nylund	May 2001	B1
6236702	Chun et al.	May 2001	B1
6243433	Adamson et al.	Jun 2001	B1
6278757	Yokomizo et al.	Aug 2001	B1
6278759	Yoon et al.	Aug 2001	B1
6310931	Gustafsson et al.	Oct 2001	B1
6320924	Croteau	Nov 2001	B1
6327324	Nylund	Dec 2001	B2
6339205	Nakayama	Jan 2002	B1
6385271	Nylund	May 2002	B2
6393087	Oh et al.	May 2002	B1
6400788	Hirano et al.	Jun 2002	B1
6421407	Kang et al.	Jul 2002	B1
6429403	Nakayama	Aug 2002	B1
6434209	Groeneveld et al.	Aug 2002	B1
6473482	Steinke	Oct 2002	B1
6488783	King et al.	Dec 2002	B1
6516043	Chaki et al.	Feb 2003	B1
6519309	Van Swam	Feb 2003	B1
6522710	Smith et al.	Feb 2003	B2
6539073	Smith et al.	Mar 2003	B1
6542566	Adamson et al.	Apr 2003	B2
6542567	Mayet et al.	Apr 2003	B1
6544361	Diz et al.	Apr 2003	B1
6608880	Smith et al.	Aug 2003	B2
6608881	Oh et al.	Aug 2003	B2
6621885	Brichet	Sep 2003	B2
6665366	Aujollet et al.	Dec 2003	B2
6690758	Elkins	Feb 2004	B1
6707872	Yoon et al.	Mar 2004	B2
6714619	Oh et al.	Mar 2004	B2
6721384	Oh et al.	Apr 2004	B2
6728329	Hirano et al.	Apr 2004	B2
6744842	Schmidt et al.	Jun 2004	B2
6758917	King et al.	Jul 2004	B2
6807246	Kim et al.	Oct 2004	B1
6819733	Broders et al.	Nov 2004	B2
6845138	Chun et al.	Jan 2005	B2
6847695	Kageyama et al.	Jan 2005	B2
6863745	Charquet et al.	Mar 2005	B1
6884304	Charquet	Apr 2005	B1
6888911	Stabel-Weinheimer et al.	May 2005	B2
6888912	Morel et al.	May 2005	B2
6901128	Mori et al.	May 2005	B2
6909766	Kido et al.	Jun 2005	B2
6925138	Nakamaru et al.	Aug 2005	B2
6934350	Challberg et al.	Aug 2005	B1
6943315	Cho et al.	Sep 2005	B2
6960326	Webb et al.	Nov 2005	B1
6991731	Koegler	Jan 2006	B2
7037390	Miyahara et al.	May 2006	B2
7085340	Goldenfield et al.	Aug 2006	B2
7087206	Bond et al.	Aug 2006	B2
7127024	Garzarolli et al.	Oct 2006	B2
7169370	Mesmin et al.	Jan 2007	B2
7192563	Singh et al.	Mar 2007	B2
7195745	Brandel et al.	Mar 2007	B2
7309473	Caranoni et al.	Dec 2007	B2
7323153	Amamoto et al.	Jan 2008	B2
20020075988	Hirano et al.	Jun 2002	A1
20020080908	Nakamaru et al.	Jun 2002	A1
20020122762	Fukasawa et al.	Sep 2002	A1
20030026381	Ukai et al.	Feb 2003	A1
20050031067	Mori et al.	Feb 2005	A1
20050069075	D'Auvergne	Mar 2005	A1
20050105677	Yoon et al.	May 2005	A1
20050157836	Broach et al.	Jul 2005	A1
20050226358	Bonnamour et al.	Oct 2005	A1
20050238131	Hellandbrand et al.	Oct 2005	A1
20060045231	Lee et al.	Mar 2006	A1
20060153327	Jiang et al.	Jul 2006	A1
20060171498	D'Auvergne	Aug 2006	A1
20060233685	Janes	Oct 2006	A1
20060251205	Balog	Nov 2006	A1
20060283790	Elkins et al.	Dec 2006	A1
20070036260	Fetterman et al.	Feb 2007	A1
20070080328	Zavodchikov et al.	Apr 2007	A1
20070133734	Fawcett et al.	Jun 2007	A1
20070165766	Aleshin et al.	Jul 2007	A1
20070183556	Labarriere et al.	Aug 2007	A1
20070201605	Ishii et al.	Aug 2007	A1
20070206717	Conner et al.	Sep 2007	A1
20070211843	Smith et al.	Sep 2007	A1
20070242793	Song et al.	Oct 2007	A1
20080013667	Oh et al.	Jan 2008	A1
20080130820	Ukai et al.	Jun 2008	A1
20080144762	Holden et al.	Jun 2008	A1
20080152068	Aktas et al.	Jun 2008	A1
20080152069	Aktas et al.	Jun 2008	A1
20080179042	Evans et al.	Jul 2008	A1
20090252278	Bashkirtsev	Oct 2009	A1
20110311016	Bashkirtsev et al.	Dec 2011	A1
20130114777	Goszczynski	May 2013	A1
20130322591	Bashkirtsev et al.	Dec 2013	A1
20160035441	Totemeier et al.	Feb 2016	A1

Foreign Referenced Citations (79)

Number	Date	Country
86108810	Aug 1987	CN
1192820	Sep 1998	CN
1230280	Sep 1999	CN
1351352	May 2002	CN
1945751	Apr 2007	CN
101299351	Nov 2008	CN
102301430	Dec 2011	CN
102543224	Jul 2012	CN
102947890	Feb 2013	CN
1464481	Jan 1969	DE
1514124	Sep 1969	DE
0080853	Jun 1983	EP
0620558	Oct 1994	EP
0871958	Oct 1998	EP
2 372 717	Oct 2011	EP
1444002	Jul 1966	FR
2632657	Dec 1989	FR
853511	Nov 1960	GB
876 021	Aug 1961	GB
876 399	Aug 1961	GB
887713	Jan 1962	GB
904 140	Aug 1962	GB
920343	Mar 1963	GB
1 031 678	Jun 1966	GB
1043782	Sep 1966	GB
1068964	May 1967	GB
1 126 396	Sep 1968	GB
1 282 767	Jul 1972	GB
1 287 767	Sep 1972	GB
2229172	Sep 1990	GB
34-001962	Feb 1956	JP
S38-005344	May 1963	JP
S39-009943	Jun 1964	JP
S41-002279	Feb 1966	JP
S41-021399	Dec 1966	JP
S42-012028	Jul 1967	JP
S43-020223	Aug 1968	JP
58-021194	Feb 1983	JP
58 187891	Nov 1983	JP
59-23830	Feb 1984	JP
S62-168091	Jul 1987	JP
63-134520	Jun 1988	JP
2018328	Jan 1990	JP
H02 66494	Mar 1990	JP
2221893	Nov 1990	JP
H06-094869	Apr 1994	JP
H06-201872	Jul 1994	JP
11-183674	Jul 1999	JP
11-508367	Jul 1999	JP
H11-511553	Oct 1999	JP
11-352272	Dec 1999	JP
3094195	Oct 2000	JP
2001-500265	Jan 2001	JP
2002-122687	Apr 2002	JP
2003-248079	Sep 2003	JP
2004-020463	Jan 2004	JP
2006-284487	Oct 2006	JP
2007-507700	Mar 2007	JP
2007-507702	Mar 2007	JP
2008-170454	Jul 2008	JP
04-303796	Jul 2009	JP
2011-508877	Mar 2011	JP
2010 0129798	Dec 2010	KR
2170956	Jul 2001	RU
2176826	Dec 2001	RU
2222837	Jan 2004	RU
2246142	Feb 2005	RU
2267175	Dec 2005	RU
2294570	Feb 2007	RU
2 389 089	May 2010	RU
2389089	May 2010	RU
2389089	May 2010	RU
WO-1985001826	Apr 1985	WO
WO-9316477	Aug 1993	WO
WO-9708711	Mar 1997	WO
WO-2002010074	Feb 2002	WO
WO-2009082254	Jul 2009	WO
2010074592	Jul 2010	WO
WO-2011143293	Nov 2011	WO

Non-Patent Literature Citations (58)

Entry
Akabori, “Interdiffusion in the U-Zr system at d-phase compositions”, Journal of Alloys and Compounds 271-273 (1998) 597-601.
Kouhsen, “Preparation and Thermochemical Stability of Uranium-Zirconium-Carbonitrides”, Journal of Nuclear Materials 61 (1976) 88-98.
Bol'shakov, “Experimental study of burnout in channels with twisted fuel rods”, Thermal Engineering, vol. 54, No. 5, May 2007, pp. 386-389.
Simnad, “The U-ZrHx Alloy: Its Properties and use in TRIGA Fuel”, Nuclear Engineering and Design 64 (1981) 403-422.
Reasons for Rejection dated Dec. 24, 2014 in Korean Patent Application No. 10-2011-7016736.
Notice of Reasons for Rejection dated Feb. 3, 2015 in Japanese Patent Application No. 2013-510271.
Translation of Examination Report dated Jan. 20, 2015 in Ukranian Patent Application No. a201213992.
Notice of Reasons for Rejection dated Oct. 7, 2014 in related Japanese Patent Application No. 2011-543460.
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Sep. 15, 2014 in International Patent Application No. PCT/US2014/036437.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Aug. 25, 2013 of PCT/US2012/020878 filed Jan. 11, 2012 (11 pages).
Buongiorno et al., Core Design Options for High Power Density BWRs (MIT-NFC-PR-089), Nuclear Fuel Cycle (NFC) Technology and Policy Program, Dec. 2006.
Buongiorno et al., Core Design Options for High Power Density BWRs (MIT-NFC-PR-097), Nuclear Fuel Cycle (NFC) Technology and Policy Program, Nov. 2007.
Buongiorno et al., Core Design Options for High Power Density BWRs (MIT-NFC-PR-102), Nuclear Fuel Cycle (NFC) Technology and Policy Program, Sep. 2008.
Canadian Office Action dated Mar. 12, 2014 in related Canadian Patent Application No. 2,710,432.
Carpenter et al., High Performance Fuel Design for Next Generation PWRs: Final Report (MIT-NFC-PR-082), Nuclear Fuel Cycle (NFC) Technology and Policy Program, Jan. 2006.
Chinese Office Action dated Aug. 19, 2013 in related Chinese Patent Application No. 200880132741.8.
Diakov, C., “Feasibility of converting Russian icebreaker reactors from HEU to LEU fuel,” Science and Global Security, vol. 14, pp. 33-48, Routledge Taylor & Francia Group, 2006.
European Search Report issued in European Patent Application No. 08172834 dated Aug. 19, 2009.
European Search Report issued in European Patent Application No. 10166457 dated Aug. 11, 2010.
Examination Report dated Feb. 14, 2014 in related Australian Patent Application No. 2011250906.
Examination Report dated Sep. 17, 2013 in related Australian Application No. 2008365658.
Halber et al., “Energy Futures,” MIT Energy Initiative, 2009, ISSN 1942-4671, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, pp. 5-7.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability issued in International Application No. PCT/RU2008/000801 dated Jul. 5, 2011.
International Search Report issued in International Application No. PCT/RU2007/000732 dated Jul. 10, 2008.
International Search Report issued in International Application No. PCT/RU2008/000801 dated Sep. 3, 2009.
Japanese Office Action dated Oct. 1, 2013 in related Japanese Patent Application No. 2011-543460.
Korean Office Action dated Feb. 25, 2014 in related Korean Patent Application No. 10-2010-7016627.
Korean Office Action dated Feb. 25, 2014 in related Korean Patent Application No. 10-2010-7026035.
Supplementary European Search Report issued in European Patent Application No. 08879222.1 dated Apr. 16, 2013.
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/139,677 dated Mar. 10, 2014.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT/US2011-035859, dated Nov. 22, 2012.
Bol'Sakov, V. V., et al., “Experiemental study of burnout in channels with twisted Fuel rods”, Thermal Engineering, vol. 54, No. 5 (May 1, 2007).
Intl Search Report/Written Opinion dated Sep. 21, 2011 of PCT/US2011/036034 filed May 11, 2011 (15 pages).
Japanese Decision for Grant dated Aug. 2, 2016 in Japanese Patent Application No. 2013-510271.
Japanese Decision for Grant dated Aug. 2, 2016 in Japanese Patent Application No. 2015-094071.
Notice of Allowance dated Feb. 22, 2016 in Chinese Patent Application No. 201180023785.9.
Decision of Grant (and partial English translation) dated Mar. 15, 2016 in Japanese Patent Application No. 2014-114955.
Notice of Reasons for Rejection (and English translation) dated Mar. 15, 2016 in Japanese Patent Application No. 2015-094071.
International Search Report dated Feb. 10, 2016 in International Patent Application No. PCT/US2015/050454.
Written Opinion dated Feb. 10, 2016 in International Patent Application No. PCT/US2015/050454.
Decision for Grant and Partial English Translation dated Apr. 28, 2015 in Japanese Patent Application No. 2011-543460.
Notice of Reasons for Rejection and Organized Translation dated Nov. 4, 2015 in Japanese Patent Application No. 2013-510271.
Extended European Search Report dated May 4, 2016 in European Patent Application No. 16153633.9.
Office Action dated Jun. 9, 2016 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/081,056.
Office Action dated Oct. 18, 2016 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/081,056.
Chinese Office Action and English Translation dated Nov. 28, 2016 in Chinese Patent Application No. 201480036401.0.
Office Action dated Mar. 20, 2017 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/081,056.
Notification of Reasons for Refusal dated Jun. 5, 2017 in Japanese Patent Application No. 2016-171063.
Office Action dated Oct. 18, 2017 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/856,084.
Tayal et al., “A 61-Element Fuel Design (HAC) for Very High Bumups,” Conference on CANDU Fuel, Oct. 1995, (1995), pp. 5A-20-5A-30.
Conboy et al., “Experimental Investigation of Hydraulics and Lateral Mixing for Helical-Cruciform Fuel Rod Assemblies,” Nuclear Technology, vol. 182, Jun. 2013, (2013), pp. 259-273.
First Office Action dated Jun. 2, 2017 in Chinese Patent Application No. 2016102180563.
Patent Search Report dated May 24, 2017 in Chinese Patent Application No. 2016102180563.
Office Action dated Jul. 24, 2017 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/081,056.
Notification of Reasons for Refusal issued in related Japanese Patent Application No. 2016-512961 dated Oct. 16, 2017.
Office Action dated Mar. 8, 2018 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/856,084.
Conboy, “Thermal-Hydraulic Analysis of Cross-Shaped Spiral Fuel in High Power Density BWRs,” Doctoral Dissertation, MIT, 2007.
Office Action dated Mar. 29, 2018 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/081,056 [Available in IFW].

Related Publications (1)

	Number	Date	Country
	20130322591 A1	Dec 2013	US

Provisional Applications (3)

Number	Date	Country
61333467	May 2010	US
61393499	Oct 2010	US
61444990	Feb 2011	US

Fuel assembly

Information

Patent Number

Date Filed

Date Issued

Inventors

Original Assignees

Examiners

Agents

CPC

Field of Search

US

CPC

International Classifications

Term Extension

Abstract