1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates generally to nuclear fuel assemblies used in the core of a nuclear reactor, and relates more specifically to metal nuclear fuel elements.
2. Description of Related Art
U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2009/0252278 A1, the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference, discloses a nuclear fuel assembly that includes seed and blanket sub-assemblies. The blanket sub-assembly includes thorium-based fuel elements. The seed sub-assembly includes Uranium and/or Plutonium metal fuel elements used to release neutrons, which are captured by the Thorium blanket elements, thereby creating fissionable U-233 that burns in situ and releases heat for the nuclear power plant.
PCT Publication No. WO2011/143293 (A1), the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference, discloses a variety of fuel assemblies and fuel elements that utilize extruded, spiral (i.e., helically twisted) fuel elements with metal or ceramic fuel.
The surface area of the cylindrical tube of conventional fuel rods limits the amount of heat that can be transferred from the rod to the primary coolant. To avoid overheating the fuel rod in view of the limited surface area for heat flux removal, the amount of fissile material in these uranium oxide fuel rods or mixed oxide (plutonium and uranium oxide) fuel rods has conventionally been substantially limited.
One or more embodiments of the present invention overcome various disadvantages of conventional uranium oxide fuel rods by replacing them with all metal, multi-lobed, powder metallurgy co-extruded fuel rods (fuel elements). The metal fuel elements have significantly more surface area than their uranium oxide rod counterparts, and therefore facilitate significantly more heat transfer from the fuel element to the primary coolant at a lower temperature. The spiral ribs of the multi-lobed fuel elements provide structural support to the fuel element, which may facilitate the reduction in the quantity or elimination of spacer grids that might otherwise have been required. Reduction in the quantity or elimination of such spacer grids advantageously reduces the hydraulic drag on the coolant, which can improve heat transfer to the coolant. Because the metal fuel elements may be relatively more compact than their conventional uranium oxide fuel rod counterparts, more space within the fuel assembly is provided for coolant, which again reduces hydraulic drag and improves heat transfer to the coolant. The higher heat transfer from the metal fuel rods to the coolant means that it is possible to generate more heat (i.e., power), while simultaneously maintaining the fuel elements at a lower operating temperature due to the considerably higher thermal conductivity of metals versus oxides. Although conventional uranium oxide or mixed oxide fuel rods typically are limited to fissile material loading of around 4-5% due to overheating concerns, the higher heat transfer properties of the metal fuel elements according to various embodiments of the present invention enable significantly greater fissile material loadings to be used while still maintaining safe fuel performance. Ultimately, the use of metal fuel elements according to one or more embodiments of the present invention can provide more power from the same reactor core than possible with conventional uranium oxide or mixed oxide fuel rods.
The use of all-metal fuel elements according to one or more embodiments of the present invention may advantageously reduce the risk of fuel failure because the metal fuel elements reduce the risk of fission gas release to the primary coolant, as is possible in conventional uranium oxide or mixed oxide fuel rods.
The use of all-metal fuel elements according to one or more embodiments of the present invention may also be safer than conventional uranium oxide fuel rods because the all-metal design increases heat transfer within the fuel element, thereby reducing temperature variations within the fuel element, and reducing the risk of localized overheating of the fuel element.
One or more embodiments provides an axially elongated fuel element for use in a fuel assembly of a nuclear reactor. The fuel element includes: a kernel including fissionable material; and a cladding enclosing the kernel. A ratio of an axial length of the fuel element to a circumscribed diameter of the fuel element is at least 20:1. An axial centerline of the fuel element is offset from an axial center of mass of the fuel element.
According to one or more of these embodiments, the fuel element has a multi-lobed profile that forms spiral ribs, wherein the spiral ribs include fissionable material.
According to one or more of these embodiments, the multi-lobed profile includes concave areas between adjacent lobes.
According to one or more of these embodiments, at least one circumferential side of the cladding is laterally reduced in size (e.g., shortened) relative to at least one other circumferential side of the cladding.
According to one or more of these embodiments, an axial center of mass of the kernel is disposed at the axial centerline, and wherein an axial center of mass of the cladding is offset from the axial centerline.
One or more embodiments provides a fuel assembly for use in a core of a nuclear power reactor. The assembly includes a frame including a lower nozzle that is shaped and configured to mount to the nuclear reactor internal core structure; and a plurality of elongated, extruded fuel elements supported by the frame. Each of said plurality of fuel elements includes a fuel kernel including fuel material disposed in a matrix of metal non-fuel material, the fuel material including fissile material, and a cladding surrounding the fuel kernel. Each of the fuel elements has a multi-lobed profile that forms spiral ribs. The plurality of fuel elements provide all of the fissile material of the fuel assembly. Each of the plurality of fuel elements is disposed in a different grid position of a grid pattern defined by the frame such that a subset of the plurality of fuel elements are disposed along an outer perimeter of the grid pattern. At least one outer side of the cladding on at least some of the fuel elements disposed along an outer perimeter of the grid pattern are laterally reduced in size.
According to one or more of these embodiments, the frame includes a shroud such that all of the plurality of fuel elements are disposed inside the shroud, and the laterally reduced outer sides of the cladding contact the shroud.
According to one or more of these embodiments, in a cross section of the fuel assembly that is perpendicular to an axial direction of the fuel elements, an area of each of the fuel kernels of the at least some of the fuel elements disposed along an outer perimeter of the grid pattern is smaller than an area of at least one of the fuel kernels of in a remainder of the plurality of fuel elements.
According to one or more of these embodiments, each of the plurality fuel elements is separated from adjacent fuel elements by a common centerline-to-centerline distance, and a circumscribed diameter of each of the plurality of fuel elements equals the centerline-to-centerline distance.
According to one or more of these embodiments, the fuel material includes ceramic fuel material disposed in the matrix of metal non-fuel material.
According to one or more of these embodiments, the cladding is at least 0.4 mm thick throughout each of the plurality of fuel elements.
According to one or more of these embodiments, the fuel assembly is thermodynamically designed and physically shaped for operation in a conventional land-based nuclear power reactor of a conventional nuclear power plant having a reactor design that was in actual use before 2013. The frame is shaped and configured to fit into the land-based nuclear power reactor in place of a conventional uranium oxide fuel assembly for said reactor.
According to one or more of these embodiments, the spiral ribs of adjacent ones of the plurality of fuel elements periodically contact each other over the axial length of the fuel elements, such contact helping to maintain the spacing of the fuel elements relative to each other.
According to one or more of these embodiments, a portion of the fuel assembly that supports the subset of the elongated fuel elements is inseparable from a portion of the fuel assembly that supports the rest of the plurality of fuel elements.
According to one or more of these embodiments, the grid pattern defines a 17×17 pattern of grid positions, and guide tubes occupy grid positions at row, column positions: 3,6; 3,9; 3,12; 4,4; 4;14; 6,3; 6,15; 9,3; 9,15; 12,3; 12,15; 14,4; 14,14; 15,6; 15,9; and 15,12.
One or more embodiments provides a fuel assembly for use in a core of a nuclear power reactor. The assembly includes: a frame including a lower nozzle that is shaped and configured to mount to the nuclear reactor internal core structure; and a plurality of elongated fuel elements supported by the frame, each of said plurality of fuel elements including fissile material. As viewed in a cross section that is perpendicular to an axial direction of the fuel assembly, the plurality of fuel elements are arranged into a mixed grid pattern that includes a first grid pattern and a second grid pattern. The second grid pattern is different from the first grid pattern.
According to one or more of these embodiments, the plurality of fuel elements includes non-overlapping first, second, and third subsets, each subset including a plurality of the fuel elements. The plurality of fuel elements of the first subset are disposed within respective grid positions defined by the first grid pattern. The plurality of fuel elements of the second subset are disposed within respective grid positions defined by the second grid pattern. The plurality of fuel elements of the third subset are disposed within respective overlapping grid positions, the overlapping grid positions falling within both the first grid pattern and the second grid pattern.
According to one or more of these embodiments, each of the plurality of fuel elements has a common circumscribed diameter.
According to one or more of these embodiments, the first grid pattern includes a pattern of square rows and columns. The centerline-to-centerline distance between the rows and columns is the common circumscribed diameter. The second grid pattern includes a pattern of equilateral triangles. A length of each side of each triangle is the common circumscribed diameter.
According to one or more of these embodiments, the fuel assembly also includes additional fuel elements supported by the frame. The additional fuel elements are not disposed within any of the grid positions defined by the first or second grid pattern.
According to one or more of these embodiments, each of the plurality of fuel elements includes: a fuel kernel including fuel material disposed in a matrix of metal non-fuel material, the fuel material including fissile material, and a cladding surrounding the fuel kernel. Each of the fuel elements has a multi-lobed profile that forms spiral ribs.
One or more embodiments of the present invention provide a fuel assembly for use in a core of a nuclear power reactor (e.g., a land-based or marine nuclear reactor). The assembly includes a frame including a lower nozzle that is shaped and configured to mount to the nuclear reactor internal core structure, and a plurality of elongated metal fuel elements supported by the frame. Each of the plurality of fuel elements includes a metal fuel alloy kernel including metal fuel material and a metal non-fuel material. The fuel material includes fissile material. Each fuel element also includes a cladding surrounding the fuel kernel. The plurality of elongated metal fuel elements provide all of the fissile material of the fuel assembly.
According to one or more of these embodiments, the fuel assembly is thermodynamically designed and physically shaped for operation in a land-based nuclear power reactor.
According to one or more embodiments, the fuel assembly may be used in combination with a land-based nuclear power reactor, wherein the fuel assembly is disposed within the land-based nuclear power reactor.
According to one or more of these embodiments, with respect to a plurality of the plurality of fuel elements: the fuel material of the fuel kernel is enriched to 20% or less by uranium-235 and/or uranium-233 and includes between a 20% and 30% volume fraction of the fuel kernel; and the non-fuel metal includes between a 70% and 80% volume fraction of the fuel kernel. With respect to the plurality of the plurality of fuel elements, the fuel material enrichment may be between 15% and 20%. The non-fuel metal of the fuel kernel may include zirconium.
According to one or more of these embodiments, the kernel includes δ-phase UZr2.
According to one or more of these embodiments, with respect to a plurality of the plurality of fuel elements: the fuel material of the fuel kernel includes plutonium; the non-fuel metal of the fuel kernel includes zirconium; and the non-fuel metal of the fuel kernel includes between a 70% and 97% volume fraction of the fuel kernel.
According to one or more of these embodiments, the fuel material includes a combination of: uranium and thorium; plutonium and thorium; or uranium, plutonium, and thorium.
According to one or more of these embodiments, the cladding of a plurality of the plurality of fuel elements is metallurgically bonded to the fuel kernel.
According to one or more of these embodiments, the non-fuel metal of a plurality of the plurality of fuel elements includes aluminum.
According to one or more of these embodiments, the non-fuel metal of a plurality of the plurality of fuel elements includes a refractory metal.
According to one or more of these embodiments, the cladding of a plurality of the plurality of fuel elements includes zirconium.
According to one or more of these embodiments, a plurality of the plurality of fuel elements are manufactured via co-extrusion of the fuel kernel and cladding.
According to one or more of these embodiments, the fuel assembly, one or more fuel elements thereof, and/or one or more fuel kernels thereof includes burnable poison.
According to one or more of these embodiments, the plurality of elongated metal fuel elements provide at least 80% by volume of the overall fissile material of the fuel assembly.
According to one or more of these embodiments, the land-based nuclear power reactor is a conventional nuclear power plant having a reactor design that was in actual use before 2013. The frame may be shaped and configured to fit into the land-based nuclear power reactor in place of a conventional uranium oxide fuel assembly for the reactor.
According to one or more of these embodiments, the kernel may include ceramic fuel material instead of metal fuel material. In one or more such embodiments, the fuel material includes ceramic fuel material disposed in a matrix of metal non-fuel material. Conversely, in one or more metal fuel embodiments, the plurality of elongated, extruded fuel elements include a plurality of elongated, extruded metal fuel elements; the fuel material includes metal fuel material; and the fuel kernel includes a metal fuel alloy kernel including an alloy of the metal fuel material and the matrix of metal non-fuel material.
According to one or more of these embodiments, the frame comprises a shroud such that all of the plurality of fuel elements are disposed inside the shroud, and the fuel assembly comprises at least one corner structure disposed at a corner of the fuel assembly and attached to the shroud. According to one or more of these embodiments, the at least one corner structure comprises a burnable poison. According to one or more of these embodiments, the at least one corner structure abuts at least one of the plurality of elongated fuel elements.
These and other aspects of various embodiments of the present invention, as well as the methods of operation and functions of the related elements of structure and the combination of parts and economies of manufacture, will become more apparent upon consideration of the following description and the appended claims with reference to the accompanying drawings, all of which form a part of this specification, wherein like reference numerals designate corresponding parts in the various figures. In one embodiment of the invention, the structural components illustrated herein are drawn to scale. It is to be expressly understood, however, that the drawings are for the purpose of illustration and description only and are not intended as a definition of the limits of the invention. In addition, it should be appreciated that structural features shown or described in any one embodiment herein can be used in other embodiments as well. As used in the specification and in the claims, the singular form of “a”, “an”, and “the” include plural referents unless the context clearly dictates otherwise.
For a better understanding of embodiments of the present invention as well as other objects and further features thereof, reference is made to the following description which is to be used in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, where:
As shown in
As shown in
As shown in
Lower axial ends of the elements 20 form pins 20a that fit into holes 70a in the lower tie plate 70 to support the elements 20 and help maintain proper element 20 spacing. The pins 20a mount to the holes 70a in a manner that prevents the elements 20 from rotating about their axes or axially moving relative to the lower tie plate 70. This restriction on rotation helps to ensure that contact points between adjacent elements 20 all occur at the same axial positions along the elements 20 (e.g., at self-spacing planes discussed below). The connection between the pins 20a and holes 70a may be created via welding, interference fit, mating non-cylindrical features that prevent rotation (e.g., keyway and spline), and/or any other suitable mechanism for restricting axial and/or rotational movement of the elements 20 relative to the lower tie plate 70. The lower tie plate 70 includes axially extending channels (e.g., a grid of openings) through which coolant flows toward the elements 20.
Upper axial ends of the elements 20 form pins 20a that freely fit into holes 80a in the upper tie plate 80 to permit the upper pins 20a to freely axially move upwardly through to the upper tie plate 80 while helping to maintain the spacing between elements 20. As a result, when the elements 20 axially grow during fission, the elongating elements 20 can freely extend further into the upper tie plate 80.
As shown in
A displacer 110 that comprises a refractory metal is placed along the longitudinal axis in the center of the fuel kernel 100. The displacer 110 helps to limit the temperature in the center of the thickest part of the fuel element 20 by displacing fissile material that would otherwise occupy such space and minimize variations in heat flux along the surface of the fuel element. According to various embodiments, the displacer 110 may be eliminated altogether.
As shown in
The cladding 120 may have a substantially uniform thickness in the annular direction (i.e., around the perimeter of the cladding 120 as shown in the cross-sectional view of
The refractory metal used in the displacer 110, the fuel kernel 100, and the cladding 120 comprises zirconium according to one or more embodiments of the invention. As used herein, the term zirconium means pure zirconium or zirconium in combination with other alloy material(s). However, other refractory metals may be used instead of zirconium without deviating from the scope of the present invention (e.g., niobium, molybdenum, tantalum, tungsten, rhenium, titanium, vanadium, chromium, zirconium, hafnium, ruthenium, osmium, iridium, and/or other metals). As used herein, the term “refractory metal” means any metal/alloy that has a melting point above 1800 degrees Celsius (2073K).
Moreover, in certain embodiments, the refractory metal may be replaced with another non-fuel metal, e.g., aluminum. However, the use of a non-refractory non-fuel metal is best suited for reactor cores that operate at lower temperatures (e.g., small cores that have a height of about 1 meter and an electric power rating of 100 MWe or less). Refractory metals are preferred for use in cores with higher operating temperatures.
As shown in
As shown in
As shown in
As shown in
While the illustrated elements 20 are themselves full length, the elements 20 may alternatively be segmented, such that the multiple segments together make a full length element. For example, 4 individual 1 meter element segments 20 may be aligned end to end to effectively create the full-length element. Additional tie plates 70, 80 may be provided at the intersections between segments to maintain the axial spacing and arrangement of the segments.
According to one or more embodiments, the fuel kernel 100 comprises a combination of a refractory metal/alloy and fuel material. The refractory metal/alloy may comprise a zirconium alloy. The fuel material may comprise low enriched uranium (e.g., U235, U233), plutonium, or thorium combined with low enriched uranium as defined below and/or plutonium. As used herein, “low enriched uranium” means that the whole fuel material contains less than 20% by weight fissile material (e.g., uranium-235 or uranium-233). According to various embodiments, the uranium fuel material is enriched to between 1% and 20%, 5% and 20%, 10% and 20%, and/or 15% and 20% by weight of uranium-235. According to one or more embodiments, the fuel material comprises 19.7% enriched uranium-235.
According to various embodiments, the fuel material may comprise a 3-10%, 10-40%, 15-35%, and/or 20-30% volume fraction of the fuel kernel 100. According to various embodiments, the refractory metal may comprise a 60-99%, 60-97%, 70-97%, 60-90%, 65-85%, and/or 70-80% volume fraction of the fuel kernel 100. According to one or more embodiments, volume fractions within one or more of these ranges provide an alloy with beneficial properties as defined by the material phase diagram for the specified alloy composition. The fuel kernel 100 may comprise a Zr—U alloy that is a high-alloy fuel (i.e., relatively high concentration of the alloy constituent relative to the uranium constituent) comprised of either δ-phase UZr2, or a combination of δ-phase UZr2 and α-phase Zr. According to one or more embodiments, the δ-phase of the U—Zr binary alloy system may range from a zirconium composition of approximately 65-81 volume percent (approximately 63 to 80 atom percent) of the fuel kernel 100. One or more of these embodiments have been found to result in low volumetric, irradiation-induced swelling of the fuel element 20. According to one or more such embodiments, fission gases are entrained within the metal kernel 100 itself, such that one or more embodiments of the fuel element 20 can omit a conventional gas gap from the fuel element 20. According to one or more embodiments, such swelling may be significantly less than would occur if low alloy (α-phase only) compositions were used (e.g., at least 10%, 20%, 30%, 50%, 75%, 100%, 200%, 300%, 500%, 1000%, 1200%, 1500%, or greater reduction in volume percent swelling per atom percent burnup than if a low alloy α-phase U-10Zr fuel was used). According to one or more embodiments of the present invention, irradiation-induced swelling of the fuel element 20 or kernel 100 thereof may be less than 20, 15, 10, 5, 4, 3, and/or 2 volume percent per atom percent burnup. According to one or more embodiments, swelling is expected to be around one volume percent per atom percent burnup.
According to one or more alternative embodiments of the present invention, the fuel kernel is replaced with a plutonium-zirconium binary alloy with the same or similar volume percentages as with the above-discussed U—Zr fuel kernels 100, or with different volume percentages than with the above-discussed U—Zr fuel kernels 100. For example, the plutonium fraction in the kernel 100 may be substantially less than a corresponding uranium fraction in a corresponding uranium-based kernel 100 because plutonium typically has about 60-70% weight fraction of fissile isotopes, while LEU uranium has 20% or less weight fraction of fissile U-235 isotopes. According to various embodiments, the plutonium volume fraction in the kernel 100 may be less than 15%, less than 10%, and/or less than 5%, with the volume fraction of the refractory metal being adjusted accordingly.
The use of a high-alloy kernel 100 according to one or more embodiments of the present invention may also result in the advantageous retention of fission gases during irradiation. Oxide fuels and low-alloy metal fuels typically exhibit significant fission gas release that is typically accommodated by the fuel design, usually with a plenum within the fuel rod to contain released fission gases. The fuel kernel 100 according to one or more embodiments of the present invention, in contrast, does not release fission gases. This is in part due to the low operating temperature of the fuel kernel 100 and the fact that fission gas atoms (specifically Xe and Kr) behave like solid fission products. Fission gas bubble formation and migration along grain boundaries to the exterior of the fuel kernel 100 does not occur according to one or more embodiments. At sufficiently high temperatures according to one or more embodiments, small (a few micron diameter) fission gas bubbles may form. However, these bubbles remain isolated within the fuel kernel 100 and do not form an interconnected network that would facilitate fission gas release, according to one or more embodiments of the present invention. The metallurgical bond between the fuel kernel 100 and cladding 120 may provide an additional barrier to fission gas release.
According to various embodiments, the fuel kernel 100 (or the cladding 120 or other suitable part of the fuel element 20) of one or more of the fuel elements 20 can be alloyed with a burnable poison such as gadolinium, boron, erbium or other suitable neutron absorbing material to form an integral burnable poison fuel element. Different fuel elements 20 within a fuel assembly 10 may utilize different burnable poisons and/or different amounts of burnable poison. For example, some of fuel elements 20 of a fuel assembly 10 (e.g., less than 75%, less than 50%, less than 20%, 1-15%, 1-12%, 2-12%, etc.) may include kernels 100 with 25, 20, and/or 15 weight percent or less Gd (e.g., 1-25 weight percent, 1-15 weight percent, 5-15 weight percent, etc.). Other fuel elements 20 of the fuel assembly 10 (e.g., 10-95%, 10-50%, 20-50%, a greater number of the fuel elements 20 than the fuel elements 20 that utilize Gd) may include kernels 100 with 10 or 5 weight percent or less Er (e.g., 0.1-10.0 weight percent, 0.1 to 5.0 weight percent etc.).
According to various embodiments, the burnable poison displaces the fuel material (rather than the refractory metal) relative to fuel elements 20 that do not include burnable poison in their kernels 100. For example, according to one embodiment of a fuel element 20 whose kernel 100 would otherwise include 65 volume percent zirconium and 35 volume percent uranium in the absence of a poison, the fuel element 20 includes a kernel 100 that is 16.5 volume percent Gd, 65 volume percent zirconium, and 18.5 volume percent uranium. According to one or more other embodiments, the burnable poison instead displaces the refractory metal, rather than the fuel material. According to one or more other embodiments, the burnable poison in the fuel kernel 100 displaces the refractory metal and the fuel material proportionally. Consequently, according to various of these embodiments, the burnable poison within the fuel kernel 100 may be disposed in the δ-phase of UZr2 or α-phase of Zr such that the presence of the burnable poison does not change the phase of the UZr2 alloy or Zr alloy in which the burnable poison is disposed.
Fuel elements 20 with a kernel 100 with a burnable poison may make up a portion (e.g., 0-100%, 1-99%, 1-50%, etc.) of the fuel elements 20 of one or more fuel assemblies 10 used in a reactor core. For example, fuel elements 20 with burnable poison may be positioned in strategic locations within the fuel assembly lattice of the assembly 10 that also includes fuel elements 20 without burnable poison to provide power distribution control and to reduce soluble boron concentrations early in the operating cycle. Similarly, select fuel assemblies 10 that include fuel elements 20 with burnable poison may be positioned in strategic locations within the reactor core relative to assemblies 10 that do not include fuel elements 20 with burnable poison to provide power distribution control and to reduce soluble boron concentrations early in the operating cycle. The use of such integral burnable absorbers may facilitate the design of extended operating cycles.
Alternatively and/or additionally, separate non-fuel bearing burnable poison rods may be included in the fuel assembly 10 (e.g., adjacent to fuel elements 20, in place of one or more fuel elements 20, inserted into guide tubes in fuel assemblies 10 that do not receive control rods, etc.). In one or more embodiments, such non-fuel burnable poison rods can be designed into a spider assembly similar to that which is used in the Babcock and Wilcox or Westinghouse designed reactors (referred to as burnable poison rod assemblies (BPRA)). These then may be inserted into the control rod guide tubes and locked into select fuel assemblies 10 where there are no control banks for the initial cycle of operation for reactivity control. When the burnable poison cluster is used it may be removed when the fuel assembly is relocated for the next fuel cycle. According to an alternative embodiment in which the separate non-fuel bearing burnable poison rods are positioned in place of one or more fuel elements 20, the non-fuel burnable poison rods remain in the fuel assembly 10 and are discharged along with other fuel elements 20 when the fuel assembly 10 reaches its usable life.
The fuel elements 20 are manufactured via powder-metallurgy co-extrusion. Typically, the powdered refractory metal and powdered metal fuel material (as well as the powdered burnable poison, if included in the kernel 100) for the fuel kernel 100 are mixed, the displacer 110 blank is positioned within the powder mixture, and then the combination of powder and displacer 110 is pressed and sintered into fuel core stock/billet (e.g., in a mold that is heated to varying extents over various time periods so as to sinter the mixture). The displacer 110 blank may have the same or similar cross-sectional shape as the ultimately formed displacer 110. Alternatively, the displacer 110 blank may have a shape that is designed to deform into the intended cross-sectional shape of the displacer 110 upon extrusion. The fuel core stock (including the displacer 110 and the sintered fuel kernel 100 material) is inserted into a hollow cladding 120 tube that has a sealed tube base and an opening on the other end. The opening on the other end is then sealed by an end plug made of the same material as the cladding to form a billet. The billet may be cylindrically shaped, or may have a shape that more closely resembles the ultimate cross-sectional shape of the element 20, for example, as shown in
According to one or more alternative embodiments, the fuel core stock of the fuel elements 20 may be manufactured via casting instead of sintering. Powdered or monolithic refractory metal and powdered or monolithic fuel material (as well as the powdered burnable poison, if included in the kernel 100) may be mixed, melted, and cast into a mold. The mold may create a displacer-blank-shaped void in the cast kernel 100 such that the displacer 110 blank may be inserted after the kernel 100 is cast, in the same manner that the cladding 120 is added to form the billet to be extruded. The remaining steps for manufacturing the fuel elements 20 may remain the same as or similar to the above-discuss embodiment that utilizes sintering instead of casting. Subsequent extrusion results in metallurgical bonding between the displacer 110 and kernel 100, as well as between the kernel 100 and cladding 120.
According to one or more alternative embodiments, the fuel elements 20 are manufactured using powdered ceramic fuel material instead of powdered metal fuel material. The remaining manufacturing steps may be the same as discussed above with respect to the embodiments using powdered metal fuel material. In various metal fuel embodiments and ceramic fuel embodiments, the manufacturing process may result in a fuel kernel 100 comprising fuel material disposed in a matrix of metal non-fuel material. In one or more of the metal fuel embodiments, the resulting fuel kernel 100 comprises a metal fuel alloy kernel comprising an alloy of the metal fuel material and the matrix of metal non-fuel material (e.g., a uranium-zirconium alloy). In one or more of the ceramic fuel embodiments, the kernel 100 comprises ceramic fuel material disposed in (e.g., interspersed throughout) the matrix of metal non-fuel material. According to various embodiments, the ceramic fuel material used in the manufacturing process may comprise powdered uranium or plutonium oxide, powdered uranium or plutonium nitride, powdered uranium or plutonium carbide, powdered uranium or plutonium hydride, or a combination thereof. In contrast with conventional UO2 fuel elements in which UO2 pellets are disposed in a tube, the manufacturing process according to one or more embodiments of the present invention results in ceramic fuel being disposed in a solid matrix of non-fuel material (e.g., a zirconium matrix).
As shown in
As shown in
In an n-lobed element 20 in which n fuel elements are adjacent to a particular fuel element 20, a self-spacing plane will exist every 1/n helical turn (e.g., every ¼helical turn for a four-lobed element 20 arranged in a square pattern such that four other fuel elements 20 are adjacent to the fuel element 20; every ⅓ helical turn for a three-lobed element in which three fuel elements are adjacent to the fuel element (i.e., every 120 degrees around the perimeter of the fuel element)). The pitch of the helix may be modified to create greater or fewer self-spacing planes over the axial length of the fuel elements 20. According to one embodiment, each four-lobed fuel element 20 includes multiple twists such that there are multiple self-spacing planes over the axial length of the bundle of fuel elements 20.
In the illustrated embodiment, all of the elements 20 twist in the same direction. However, according to an alternative embodiment, adjacent elements 20 may twist in opposite directions without deviating from the scope of the present invention.
The formula for the number of self-spacing planes along the fuel rod length is as follows:
N=n*L/h, where:
L—Fuel rod length
n—Number of lobes (ribs) and the number of fuel elements adjacent to a fuel element
h—Helical twist pitch
The formula is slightly different if the number of lobes and the number of fuel elements adjacent to a fuel element are not the same.
As a result of such self-spacing, the fuel assembly 10 may omit spacer grids that may otherwise have been necessary to assure proper element spacing along the length of the assembly 10. By eliminating spacer grids, coolant may more freely flow through the assembly 10, which advantageously increases the heat transfer from the elements 20 to the coolant. However, according to alternative embodiments of the present invention, the assembly 10 may include spacer grid(s) without deviating from the scope of the present invention.
As shown in
As shown in
The guide tubes 40 provide for the insertion of control absorber elements based on boron carbide (B4C), silver indium cadmium (Ag, In, Cd), dysprosium titanate (Dy2O3.TiO2) or other suitable alloys or materials used for reactivity control (not shown) and burnable absorber elements based on boron carbide, gadolinium oxide (Gd2O3) or other suitable materials (not shown) and are placed in the upper nozzle 50 with the capability of elastic axial displacement. The guide tubes 40 may comprise a zirconium alloy. For example, the guide tube 40 arrangement shown in
The shape, size, and features of the frame 25 depend on the specific reactor core for which the assembly 10 is to be used. Thus, one of ordinary skill in the art would understand how to make appropriately shaped and sized frame for the fuel assembly 10. For example, the frame 25 may be shaped and configured to fit into a reactor core of a conventional nuclear power plant in place of a conventional uranium oxide or mixed oxide fuel assembly for that plant's reactor core. The nuclear power plant may comprise a reactor core design that was in actual use before 2010 (e.g., 2, 3 or 4-loop PWRs; BWR-4). Alternatively, the nuclear power plant may be of an entirely new design that is specifically tailored for use with the fuel assembly 10.
As explained above, the illustrated fuel assembly 10 is designed for use in an AP-1000 or EPR reactor. The assembly includes a 17×17 array of fuel elements 20, 24 of which are replaced with guide tubes 40 as explained above for a total of 265 fuel elements 20 in EPR or 264 fuel elements 20 in AP-1000 (in the AP-1000, in addition to the 24 fuel elements being replaced with the guide tubes, a central fuel element is also replaced with an instrumented tube).
The elements 20 preferably provide 100% of the overall fissile material of the fuel assembly 10. Alternatively, some of the fissile material of the assembly 10 may be provided via fuel elements other than the elements 20 (e.g., non-lobed fuel elements, uranium oxide elements, elements having fuel ratios and/or enrichments that differ from the elements 20). According to various such alternative embodiments, the fuel elements 20 provide at least 50%, 60%, 70%, 75%, 80%, 85%, 90%, and/or 95% by volume of the overall fissile material of the fuel assembly 10.
Use of the metal fuel elements 20 according to one or more embodiments of the present invention facilitate various advantages over the uranium oxide or mixed oxide fuel conventionally used in light water nuclear reactors (LWR) (including boiling water reactors and pressurized water reactors) such as the Westinghouse-designed AP-1000, AREVA-designed EPR reactors, or GE-designed ABWR. For example, according to one or more embodiments, the power rating for an LWR operating on standard uranium oxide or mixed oxide fuel could be increased by up to about 30% by substituting the all-metal fuel elements 20 and/or fuel assembly 10 for standard uranium oxide fuel and fuel assemblies currently used in existing types of LWRs or new types of LWRs that have been proposed.
One of the key constraints for increasing power rating of LWRs operating on standard uranium oxide fuel has been the small surface area of cylindrical fuel elements that such fuel utilizes. A cylindrical fuel element has the lowest surface area to volume ratio for any type of fuel element cross-section profile. Another major constraint for standard uranium oxide fuel has been a relatively low burnup that such fuel elements could possibly reach while still meeting acceptable fuel performance criteria. As a result, these factors associated with standard uranium oxide or mixed oxide fuel significantly limit the degree to which existing reactor power rating could be increased.
One or more embodiments of the all-metal fuel elements 20 overcome the above limitations. For example, as explained above, the lack of spacer grids may reduce hydraulic resistance, and therefore increase coolant flow and heat flux from the elements 20 to the primary coolant. The helical twist of the fuel elements 20 may increase coolant intermixing and turbulence, which may also increase heat flux from the elements 20 to the coolant.
Preliminary neutronic and thermal-hydraulic analyses have shown the following according to one or more embodiments of the present invention:
To utilize the increased power output of the assembly 10, conventional power plants could be upgraded (e.g., larger and/or additional coolant pumps, steam generators, heat exchangers, pressurizers, turbines). Indeed, according to one or more embodiments, the upgrade could provide 30-40% more electricity from an existing reactor. Such a possibility may avoid the need to build a complete second reactor. The modification cost may quickly pay for itself via increased electrical output. Alternatively, new power plants could be constructed to include adequate features to handle and utilize the higher thermal output of the assemblies 10.
Further, one or more embodiments of the present invention could allow an LWR to operate at the same power rating as with standard uranium oxide or mixed oxide fuel using existing reactor systems without any major reactor modifications. For example, according to one embodiment:
Additionally and/or alternatively, fuel assemblies 10 according to one or more embodiments of the present invention can be phased/laddered into a reactor core in place of conventional fuel assemblies. During the transition period, fuel assemblies 10 having comparable fissile/neutronic/thermal outputs as conventional fuel assemblies can gradually replace such conventional fuel assemblies over sequential fuel changes without changing the operating parameters of the power plant. Thus, fuel assemblies 10 can be retrofitted into an existing core that may be important during a transition period (i.e., start with a partial core with fuel assemblies 10 and gradually transition to a full core of fuel assemblies 10).
Moreover, the fissile loading of assemblies 10 can be tailored to the particular transition desired by a plant operator. For example, the fissile loading can be increased appropriately so as to increase the thermal output of the reactor by anywhere from 0% to 30% or more higher, relative to the use of conventional fuel assemblies that the assemblies 10 replace. Consequently, the power plant operator can chose the specific power uprate desired, based on the existing plant infrastructure or the capabilities of the power plant at various times during upgrades.
One or more embodiments of the fuel assemblies 10 and fuel elements 20 may be used in fast reactors (as opposed to light water reactors) without deviating from the scope of the present invention. In fast reactors, the non-fuel metal of the fuel kernel 100 is preferably a refractory metal, for example a molybdenum alloy (e.g., pure molybdenum or a combination of molybdenum and other metals), and the cladding 120 is preferably stainless steel (which includes any alloy variation thereof) or other material suitable for use with coolant in such reactors (e.g., sodium). Such fuel elements 20 may be manufactured via the above-discussed co-extrusion process or may be manufactured by any other suitable method (e.g., vacuum melt).
As shown in
As shown in
The elements 20 may be positioned relative to each other in the assembly 510 so that self-spacing planes maintain spacing between the elements 20 in the manner described above with respect to the assembly 10. Alternatively, the elements 20 of the assembly 510 may be so spaced from each other that adjacent elements 20 never touch each other, and instead rely entirely on the frame 520 to maintain element 20 spacing. Additionally, spacers may be attached to the elements 20 or their ribs at various positions along the axial length of the elements 20 to contact adjacent elements 20 and help maintain element spacing 20 (e.g., in a manner similar to how spacers are used on conventional fuel rods of conventional fuel assemblies for pressurized heavy water reactors to help maintain rod spacing).
As shown in
The fuel assemblies 510 may be designed to be a direct substitute for conventional fuel assemblies (also known as fuel bundles in the art) for existing, conventional pressurized heavy water reactors (e.g., CANDU reactors). In such an embodiment, the assemblies 510 are fed into the reactor 500 in place of the conventional assemblies/bundles. Such fuel assemblies 510 may be designed to have neutronic/thermal properties similar to the conventional assemblies being replaced. Alternatively, the fuel assemblies 510 may be designed to provide a thermal power uprate. In such uprate embodiments, new or upgraded reactors 500 can be designed to accommodate the higher thermal output.
According to various embodiments of the present invention, the fuel assembly 10 is designed to replace a conventional fuel assembly of a conventional nuclear reactor. For example, the fuel assembly 10 illustrated in
According to an alternative embodiment of the present invention, the circumscribed diameter of all of the fuel elements 20 may be reduced slightly so as to reduce the overall cross-sectional size of the fuel assembly 10. For example, the circumscribed diameter of each fuel element 20 may be reduced by 0.13 mm to 12.47 mm, so that the overall cross-sectional space occupied by the fuel assembly 10 remains comparable to a conventional 214 mm by 214 mm fuel assembly (e.g., 17 12.47 mm diameter fuel elements 20 plus two 1.0 mm thickness of the shroud, which totals about 214 mm). Such a reduction in the size of the 17 by 17 array will slightly change the positions of the guide tubes 40 in the fuel assembly 10 relative to the guide tube positions in a conventional fuel assembly. To accommodate this slight position change in the tube 40 positions, the positions of the corresponding control rod array and control rod drive mechanisms in the reactor may be similarly shifted to accommodate the repositioned guide tubes 40. Alternatively, if sufficient clearances and tolerances are provided for the control rods in a conventional reactor, conventionally positioned control rods may adequately fit into the slightly shifted tubes 40 of the fuel assembly 10.
Alternatively, the diameter of the peripheral fuel elements 20 may be reduced slightly so that the overall assembly 10 fits into a conventional reactor designed for conventional fuel assemblies. For example, the circumscribed diameter of the outer row of fuel elements 20 may be reduced by 1.1 mm such that the total size of the fuel assembly is 214 mm×214 mm (e.g., 15 12.6 mm fuel elements 20 plus 2 11.5 mm fuel elements 20 plus 2 1.0 mm thicknesses of the shroud 30). Alternatively, the circumscribed diameter of the outer two rows of fuel elements 20 may be reduced by 0.55 mm each such that the total size of the fuel assembly remains 214 mm×214 mm (e.g., 13 12.6 mm fuel elements 20 plus 4 12.05 mm fuel assemblies plus 2 1.0 mm thicknesses of the shroud 30). In each embodiment, the pitch and position of the central 13×13 array of fuel elements 20 and guide tubes 40 remains unaltered such that the guide tubes 40 align with the control rod array and control rod drive mechanisms in a conventional reactor.
As shown in
The peripheral positions (i.e., the positions disposed laterally outward from the fuel elements 20) of the 17 by 17 array/pattern of the fuel assembly 610 are occupied by 64 UO2 fuel elements/rods 650. As is known in the art, the fuel rods 650 may comprise standard UO2 pelletized fuel disposed in a hollow rod. The UO2 pelletized fuel may be enriched with U-235 by less than 20%, less than 15%, less than 10%, and/or less than 5%. The rods 650 may have a slightly smaller diameter (e.g., 9.50 mm) than the circumscribed diameter of the fuel elements 20, which slightly reduces the overall cross-sectional dimensions of the fuel assembly 610 so that the assembly 610 better fits into the space allocated for a conventional UO2 fuel assembly.
In the illustrated embodiment, the fuel rods/elements 650 comprise UO2 pelletized fuel. However, the fuel rods/elements 650 may alternatively utilize any other suitable combination of one or more fissile and/or fertile materials (e.g., thorium, plutonium, uranium-235, uranium-233, any combinations thereof). Such fuel rods/elements 650 may comprise metal and/or oxide fuel.
According to one or more alternative embodiments, the fuel rods 650 may occupy less than all of the 64 peripheral positions. For example, the fuel rods 650 may occupy the top row and left column of the periphery, while the bottom row and right column of the periphery may be occupied by fuel elements 20. Alternatively, the fuel rods 650 may occupy any other two sides of the periphery of the fuel assembly. The shroud 630 may be modified so as to enclose the additional fuel elements 20 in the periphery of the fuel assembly. Such modified fuel assemblies may be positioned adjacent each other such that a row/column of peripheral fuel elements 650 in one assembly is always adjacent to a row/column of fuel elements 20 in the adjacent fuel assembly. As a result, additional space for the fuel assemblies is provided by the fact that the interface between adjacent assemblies is shifted slightly toward the assembly that includes fuel elements 650 in the peripheral, interface side. Such a modification may provide for the use of a greater number of higher heat output fuel elements 20 than is provided by the fuel assemblies 610.
A shroud 630 surrounds the array of fuel elements 20 and separates the elements 20 from the elements 650. The nozzles 50, 60, shroud 630, coolant passages formed therebetween, relative pressure drops through the elements 20 and elements 650, and/or the increased pressure drop through the spacer grid 660 (discussed below) surrounding the elements 650 may result in a higher coolant flow rate within the shroud 630 and past the higher heat output fuel elements 20 than the flow rate outside of the shroud 630 and past the relatively lower heat output fuel rods 650. The passageways and/or orifices therein may be designed to optimize the relative coolant flow rates past the elements 20, 650 based on their respective heat outputs and designed operating temperatures.
According to various embodiments, the moderator:fuel ratio for the fuel elements 20 of the fuel assembly 610 is less than or equal to 2.7, 2.6, 2.5, 2.4, 2.3, 2.2, 2.1, 2.0, 1.9, and/or 1.8. In the illustrated embodiment, the moderator:fuel ratio equals a ratio of (1) the total area within the shroud 630 available for coolant/moderator (e.g., approximated by the total cross-sectional area within the shroud 630 minus the total cross-sectional area taken up by the fuel elements 20 (assuming the guide tubes 40 are filled with coolant)) to (2) the total cross-sectional area of the kernels 100 of the fuel elements 20 within the shroud 630.
According to an alternative embodiment of the invention, the shroud 630 may be replaced with one or more annular bands or may be provided with holes in the shroud 630, as explained above. The use of bands or holes in the shroud 630 may facilitate cross-mixing of coolant between the fuel elements 20 and the fuel elements 650.
As shown in
According to various embodiments, the fuel elements 20 provide at least 60%, 65%, 70%, 75%, and/or 80% of a total volume of all fissile-material-containing fuel elements 20, 650 of the fuel assembly 610. For example, according to one or more embodiments in which the fuel assembly 610 includes 201 fuel elements 20, each having a cross-sectional area of about 70 mm2, and 64 fuel elements 650, each having a 9.5 mm diameter, the fuel elements 20 provide about 75.6% of a total volume of all fuel elements 20, 650 (201 fuel elements 20×70 mm2 equals 14070 mm2; 64 fuel elements 650×π×(9.5/2)2=4534 mm2; fuel element 20, 650 areas are essentially proportional to fuel element volumes; (14070 mm2/(14070 mm2+4534 mm2)=75.6%)).
The height of the fuel assembly 610 matches a height of a comparable conventional fuel assembly that the assembly 610 can replace (e.g., the height of a standard fuel assembly for a Westinghouse or AREVA reactor design).
The illustrated fuel assembly 610 may be used in a 17×17 PWR such as the Westinghouse 4-loop design, AP1000, or AREVA EPR. However, the design of the fuel assembly 610 may also be modified to accommodate a variety of other reactor designs (e.g., reactor designs that utilize a hexagonal fuel assembly, in which case the outer periphery of the hexagon is occupied by UO2 rods, while the inner positions are occupied by fuel elements 20, or boiling water reactors, or small modular reactors). While particular dimensions are described with regard to particular embodiments, a variety of alternatively dimensioned fuel elements 20, 650 and fuel assemblies 10 may be used in connection with a variety of reactors or reactor types without deviating from the scope of the present invention.
Depending on the specific reactor design, additional rod positions of a fuel assembly may be replaced with UO2 rods. For example, while the fuel assembly 610 includes UO2 rods only in the outer peripheral row, the assembly 610 could alternatively include UO2 rods in the outer two rows without deviating from the scope of the present invention.
According to various embodiments, the portion of the fuel assembly 610 that supports the fuel elements 650 is inseparable from the portion of the fuel assembly 610 that supports the fuel elements 20. According to various embodiments, the fuel elements 20 are not separable as a unit from the fuel elements 650 of the fuel assembly 610 (even though individual fuel elements 20, 650 may be removed from the assembly 610, for example, based on individual fuel element failure). Similarly, there is not a locking mechanism that selectively locks the fuel element 650 portion of the fuel assembly to the fuel element 20 portion of the fuel assembly 610. According to various embodiments, the fuel elements 20 and fuel elements 650 of the fuel assembly 610 have the same designed life cycle, such that the entire fuel assembly 610 is used within the reactor, and then removed as a single spent unit.
According to various embodiments, the increased heat output of the fuel elements 20 within the fuel assembly 610 can provide a power uprate relative to the conventional all UO2 fuel rod assembly that the assembly 610 replaces. According to various embodiments, the power uprate is at least 5%, 10%, and/or 15%. The uprate may be between 1 and 30%, 5 and 25%, and/or 10 and 20% according to various embodiments. According to various embodiments, the fuel assembly 610 provides at least an 18-month fuel cycle, but may also facilitate moving to a 24+ or 36+ month fuel cycle. According to an embodiment of the fuel assembly 610, which uses fuel elements 20 having the example parameters discussed above with respect to the element 20 shown in
As shown in
Making the fuel kernel 760 smaller and the cladding 770 thicker enables the portion 770b of the cladding 770 to be removed while still ensuring a sufficiently thick layer of cladding 770 around the kernel 760. According to various embodiments, the cladding 700 thickness is at least 0.4, 0.5, and/or 0.6 mm throughout the fuel element 730.
The removed portion 770b is preferably removed after the fuel element 730 is formed into the spiral, lobed shape. The removed portion 770b may be removed in any suitable way (e.g., grinding, honing, milling, etc.). As a result of the spiral, the removed portion 770b will be removed from the circumferentially aligned portions on a plurality of the lobes of the fuel element 730. In other words, portions 770b of lobes of the cladding 770 are removed in the area where the lobe is disposed at the side 770a of the fuel element 730 that will be adjacent to and abut the shroud 750. Due to the helical twist of the fuel elements 730, the cladding 770 is not removed uniformly from the fuel element 730, but rather only at the tips 770a of the lobes that impinge on the assembly 710 envelope boundary, as limited by the shroud 750. According to various embodiments, a radial shortening distance 780 of the removed portion 770b may be at least 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, and/or 10%, and/or less then 30, 20, and/or 15% of the circumscribed diameter D of the fuel element 730. According to various embodiments, the radial shortening distance 780 may be at least 0.5, 0.6, 0.7, 0.8, 0.9, 1.0, 1.1, 1.2, and/or 1.3 mm, and/or less than 4.0, 3.0, 2.0, and/or 1.5 mm.
According to alternative embodiments, the fuel element 730 may be originally formed in its final shape such that the removed portions 770b were never present and need not be removed.
As shown in
Although, according to some non-limiting embodiments, the fuel kernels 760 of the fuel elements 730, 740 have a smaller volume (or area as viewed in cross-section perpendicular to the elongated, axial direction of the fuel assembly) than the kernels 100 of the fuel elements 20, the fuel kernels 730, 740 retain various other benefits provided by the fuel element 20's shape and design, as explained elsewhere herein. According to various embodiments, the fissile loading of the kernels 760 may be increased (e.g., via more highly enriched uranium) relative to the non-peripheral kernels 20 to offset for the smaller kernel 760 volume.
As shown in
According to various embodiments, the fuel elements 20, 730, 740 are between 1 and 5 meters long (measured in the axial direction) and the circumscribed diameter is between 6 and 40 mm, between 6 and 30 mm, between 6 and 20 mm, between 9 and 15 mm, and/or about 12.6 mm. According to various embodiments, a ratio of the axial length of the fuel elements 730, 740 to their circumscribed diameter D is at least 10:1, 20:1, 30:1, 40:1, 50:1, 100:1, 200:1, and/or 300:1, and/or less than 1000:1.
In the self-spacing plane shown in
Although the fuel elements 730, 740 and fuel assembly 710 are illustrated as being designed for use in a reactor that utilizes a 17 by 17 square grid pattern fuel assembly with a specific guide tube pattern embedded therein, the fuel assembly 710 and fuel elements 20, 730, 740 may alternatively be used with a variety of other types of reactors (e.g., reactors that utilize 16 by 16 or 14 by 14 grid patterns, reactors with hexagonal fuel element grid patterns and fuel assemblies). For example, if fuel elements 20 would not properly fit into a fuel assembly for use in a reactor designed for hexagonal fuel assemblies and grid patterns, the peripheral row of the hexagonal grid of such a fuel assembly may comprise fuel elements like the fuel elements 730, 740 that have been modified so that their outer side(s) are ground down to fit in the particular required envelope, preferably without having to relocate the guide tube positions of the reactor.
As shown in
By shifting the outer peripheral row/subset of fuel elements 920a, 920b laterally inwardly, sufficient space is provided such that fuel elements 920a, 920b, 920c, 920d with a circumscribed diameter that is the same as the centerline-to-centerline spacing between fuel elements 920a, 920b, 920c, 920d can be used while fitting within the envelope of space provided in the above-discussed conventional reactors.
As shown in
The outer peripheral row of fuel elements 920a, 920c are shifted laterally inwardly toward the center of the fuel assembly 910. The inward shifting helps the assembly 910 to better fit into one or more existing reactor types (e.g., reactors using Westinghouse's fuel assembly design that utilizes a 17 by 17 array of UO2 rods) without modifying the control rod/guide tube 40 positions, control rod drive mechanisms, or fuel assembly dimensions.
In the embodiment illustrated in
Four fuel elements are omitted from the outer peripheral row/ring relative to a conventional fuel assembly so as to facilitate the inward shifting of the fuel elements 920a, 920b. In the embodiment illustrated in
As shown in
As shown in
As shown in
The fuel elements 920a, 920b, 920c, 920d include non-overlapping first (the fuel elements 920d), second (the fuel elements 920a), third (the fuel elements 920c), and fourth (the fuel elements 920b) subsets. The first subset (the fuel elements 920d) are disposed within respective grid positions defined by the first/square grid pattern. The second subset (the fuel elements 920a) are disposed within respective grid positions defined by the second/triangular grid pattern. The third subset (the fuel elements 920c) are disposed within respective overlapping grid positions that each fall within both the first/square grid pattern and the second/triangular grid pattern. The fourth subset (the fuel elements 920b) are not disposed within any of the grid positions defined by the first or second grid pattern.
As shown in
While various exemplary diameters, center-to-center spacing, grid sizes, and other dimensions are described with respect to the fuel assembly 910, these exemplary values are non-limiting. Rather, those of ordinary skill in the art would understand that a variety of alternative values could be used without deviating from the scope of the present invention.
As shown in
As shown in
As shown in
If the cross-sectional plane illustrated in
According to various embodiments, the use of a triangular grid along the outer perimeter of the assembly 1210 facilitates the use of (a) a thicker, stronger shroud 1230 than is possible according to various embodiments in which all elements are disposed in a square 16×16 grid/array (e.g., one or more embodiments of the assembly 1110 illustrated in
According to various embodiments, all of the fuel elements 1220a,b,c,d of the fuel assembly 1210 are geometrically identical to each other, and may be identical to or substantially identical to the elements 20.
Use of the corner structure 1350 may enable the fuel assembly 1310 to take advantage of the available space disposed outside of the shroud 1230.
As shown in
Use of the corner structure 1450 enables the fuel assembly 1310 to take advantage of the available space disposed inside one or more of the corners of the shroud 1430.
Use of the corner structure 1550 may enable the fuel assembly 1510 to take advantage of the available space disposed inside one or more of the corners of the shroud 1430.
Use of the corner structure 1650 may enable the fuel assembly 1610 to take advantage of the available space disposed inside one or more of the corners of the shroud 1430.
Use of the corner structure 1750 may enable the fuel assembly 1710 to take advantage of the available space disposed inside one or more of the corners of the shroud 1230.
As shown in
Use of the corner structure 1850 may enable the fuel assembly 1810 to take advantage of the available space disposed inside one or more of the corners of the assembly 1810.
According to various embodiments, a corner structure 1350, 1450, 1550, 1650, 1750, 1850 is disposed at each of the four corners of the fuel assembly 1310, 1410, 1510, 1610, 1710, 1810. However, according to alternative embodiments, the corner structure 1350, 1450, 1550, 1650, 1750, 1850 may be disposed at just 1, 2, and/or 3 of the 4 corners of the assembly 1310, 1410, 1510, 1610, 1710, 1810.
According to various embodiments, the corner structure 1350, 1450, 1550, 1650, 1750, 1850 may comprise one or more of a burnable poison, steel, alloys or ceramics of zirconium, and/or uranium, and/or plutonium, and/or thorium and/or none of these materials. According to various embodiments, the corner structure 1350, 1450, 1550, 1650, 1750, 1850 may be solid. According to various embodiments, the corner structure 1350, 1450, 1550, 1650, 1750, 1850 may comprise a hollow structure (e.g., made of tubular steel and/or zirconium metals or alloys) that may be (1) open-ended and empty to permit flow therethrough, (2) closed-ended and empty, and/or (3) closed-ended and partially or fully filled with material (e.g., oxide fuel, burnable poison, etc. in pellet or other form)).
Although the corner structures 1350, 1450, 1550, 1650, 1750, 1850 and associated shrouds 1230, 1430, 1830 are illustrated with respect to fuel assemblies 1310, 1410, 1510, 1610, 1710, 1810 that are designed for use in place of conventional 16×16 fuel assemblies, such corner structures 1350, 1450, 1550, 1650, 1750, 1850 and associated shroud configurations could alternatively be applied to the above-discussed fuel assemblies 910, 1010 that are designed for use in place of conventional 17×17 fuel assemblies without deviating from the scope of the present invention.
As shown in
According to various embodiments, spacers and/or corner structures may be added to help maintain the correct positions of the fuel elements 1920a that are adjacent to the corners and the fuel elements 1920b′.
According to various embodiments, use of the equilateral triangle spacing in two outer rings of elements (as opposed to just one ring as in the assembly of
According to various embodiments, all of the fuel elements 1920a, 1920b, 1920b′, 1920c, 1920d of the fuel assembly 1910 are geometrically identical to each other, and may be identical to or substantially identical to the elements 20. As shown in
According to various embodiments, all of the fuel elements 2020a, 2020a′, 2020b, 2020b′, 2020c, 2020d of the fuel assembly 2010 are geometrically identical to each other, and may be identical to or substantially identical to the elements 20.
While various dimensions are illustrated in various of the figures, it should be understood that such dimensions are exemplary only, and do not limit the scope of the invention. Rather, these dimensions may be modified in a variety of ways (larger or smaller, or qualitatively different) without deviating from the scope of the invention.
The fuel assemblies 10, 510, 610, 710, 910, 1010, 1110, 1210, 1310, 1410, 1510, 1610, 1710, 1810, 1910, 2010 are preferably thermodynamically designed for and physically shaped for use in a land-based nuclear power reactor 90, 500 (e.g., land-based LWRS (including BWRs and PWRs), land-based fast reactors, land-based heavy water reactors) that is designed to generate electricity and/or heat that is used for a purpose other than electricity (e.g., desalinization, chemical processing, steam generation, etc.). Such land-based nuclear power reactors 90 include, among others, VVER, AP-1000, EPR, APR-1400, ABWR, BWR-6, CANDU, BN-600, BN-800, Toshiba 4S, Monju, CE, etc. However, according to alternative embodiments of the present invention, the fuel assemblies 10, 510, 610, 710, 910, 1010, 1110, 1210, 1310, 1410, 1510, 1610, 1710, 1810, 1910, 2010 may be designed for use in and used in marine-based nuclear reactors (e.g., ship or submarine power plants; floating power plants designed to generate power (e.g., electricity) for onshore use) or other nuclear reactor applications.
The fuel assemblies 10, 510, 610, 710, 910, 1010, 1110, 1210, 1310, 1410, 1510, 1610, 1710, 1810, 1910, 2010 and the associated reactor cores are designed and configured so that the fuel assemblies 10, 510, 610, 710, 910, 1010, 1110, 1210, 1310, 1410, 1510, 1610, 1710, 1810, 1910, 2010 are disposed directly adjacent to other fuel assemblies having matching geometric envelopes (e.g., a plurality of directly adjacent fuel assemblies 10, 510, 610, 710, 910, 1010, 1110, 1210, 1310, 1410, 1510, 1610, 1710, 1810, 1910, 2010). According to various embodiments, a plurality of fuel assemblies 10, 510, 610, 710, 910, 1010, 1110, 1210, 1310, 1410, 1510, 1610, 1710, 1810, 1910, 2010 are disposed adjacent to each other in the fuel assembly grid pattern defined by the reactor core (e.g., in a square pattern for a reactor core designed to accept square fuel assemblies (e.g., AP-1000, CE), in a triangular/hexagonal pattern for a reactor core designed to accept hexagonal fuel assemblies (e.g., VVER)).
The foregoing illustrated embodiments are provided to illustrate the structural and functional principles of the present invention and are not intended to be limiting. To the contrary, the principles of the present invention are intended to encompass any and all changes, alterations and/or substitutions within the spirit and scope of the following claims.
This application claims the benefit of priority from U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/821,918, filed May 10, 2013, titled “FUEL ASSEMBLY,” the entire contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2780517 | Fontana | Feb 1957 | A |
2879216 | Horwitz | Mar 1959 | A |
2887357 | Seaberg | May 1959 | A |
2894827 | Hyde | Jul 1959 | A |
2898185 | Boyd | Aug 1959 | A |
2977297 | Evans | Mar 1961 | A |
2987458 | Breden | Jun 1961 | A |
3030291 | Butter et al. | Apr 1962 | A |
3034975 | Beurtheret | May 1962 | A |
3046088 | Horn | Jul 1962 | A |
3063925 | Huet | Nov 1962 | A |
3070527 | Hurford et al. | Dec 1962 | A |
3088900 | Brown | May 1963 | A |
3096264 | Bauer | Jul 1963 | A |
3105035 | Weems | Sep 1963 | A |
3133867 | Frisch | May 1964 | A |
3154471 | Radkowsky | Oct 1964 | A |
3177123 | Huet | Apr 1965 | A |
3197376 | Balent et al. | Jul 1965 | A |
3197383 | Maillet | Jul 1965 | A |
3208912 | Jaye et al. | Sep 1965 | A |
3219535 | Robbins | Nov 1965 | A |
3252867 | Conley | May 1966 | A |
3275564 | Pascard | Sep 1966 | A |
3282335 | De Haller | Nov 1966 | A |
3285825 | Jens | Nov 1966 | A |
3297544 | Hooper | Jan 1967 | A |
3308031 | Pon | Mar 1967 | A |
3308033 | Alfille | Mar 1967 | A |
3309277 | Jaye | Mar 1967 | A |
3322644 | Benson | May 1967 | A |
3335060 | Diener | Aug 1967 | A |
3339631 | McGurty | Sep 1967 | A |
3361640 | Hassig et al. | Jan 1968 | A |
3366547 | Gumuchian | Jan 1968 | A |
3378453 | Gorker | Apr 1968 | A |
3394049 | Jones | Jul 1968 | A |
3486973 | Georges | Dec 1969 | A |
3546068 | Schloderberg | Dec 1970 | A |
3567582 | Van Dievoet | Mar 1971 | A |
3577225 | Shaffer | May 1971 | A |
3640844 | Shank et al. | Feb 1972 | A |
3660227 | Ackroyd et al. | May 1972 | A |
3660228 | Magladry | May 1972 | A |
3671392 | Beaudoin | Jun 1972 | A |
3687805 | Desbois | Aug 1972 | A |
3714322 | Bell et al. | Jan 1973 | A |
3736227 | Nakazato | May 1973 | A |
3801734 | West | Apr 1974 | A |
3814667 | Klumb | Jun 1974 | A |
3847736 | Bevilacqua | Nov 1974 | A |
3853703 | Anthony et al. | Dec 1974 | A |
3859165 | Radkowsky et al. | Jan 1975 | A |
3956147 | Becker et al. | May 1976 | A |
3957575 | Fauth, Jr. et al. | May 1976 | A |
T947001 | Radkowsky | Jun 1976 | I4 |
3960655 | Bohanan et al. | Jun 1976 | A |
3971575 | Lesham et al. | Jul 1976 | A |
3998692 | Bohanan et al. | Dec 1976 | A |
4020131 | Feraday | Apr 1977 | A |
4029740 | Ervin, Jr. | Jun 1977 | A |
4059539 | Potter et al. | Nov 1977 | A |
4072564 | Jabsen | Feb 1978 | A |
4077835 | Bishop et al. | Mar 1978 | A |
4078967 | Anthony | Mar 1978 | A |
4111348 | Laird et al. | Sep 1978 | A |
4119563 | Kadner et al. | Oct 1978 | A |
4192716 | Anthony | Mar 1980 | A |
4193953 | Langen et al. | Mar 1980 | A |
4194948 | Ledin | Mar 1980 | A |
4202793 | Bezzi et al. | May 1980 | A |
4235669 | Burgess et al. | Nov 1980 | A |
4236966 | Savin et al. | Dec 1980 | A |
4268357 | Formanek et al. | May 1981 | A |
4273613 | Radkowsky | Jun 1981 | A |
4278501 | Steinke | Jul 1981 | A |
4285771 | Downs | Aug 1981 | A |
4292278 | Elikan et al. | Sep 1981 | A |
4298434 | Anthony et al. | Nov 1981 | A |
4304631 | Walton et al. | Dec 1981 | A |
4309251 | Anthony et al. | Jan 1982 | A |
4320093 | Volesky et al. | Mar 1982 | A |
4324618 | Schluderberg | Apr 1982 | A |
4344912 | Rampolla | Aug 1982 | A |
4381284 | Gjertsen | Apr 1983 | A |
4393510 | Lang et al. | Jul 1983 | A |
RE31583 | Klumb et al. | May 1984 | E |
4450016 | Vesterlund et al. | May 1984 | A |
4450020 | Vesterlund | May 1984 | A |
4474398 | Tolino et al. | Oct 1984 | A |
4495136 | Camden, Jr. et al. | Jan 1985 | A |
4499047 | Borrman et al. | Feb 1985 | A |
4507259 | Cowell et al. | Mar 1985 | A |
4508679 | Matzner et al. | Apr 1985 | A |
4540545 | Kondo | Sep 1985 | A |
4544522 | Curulla et al. | Oct 1985 | A |
4551300 | Feutrel | Nov 1985 | A |
4560532 | Barry et al. | Dec 1985 | A |
4572816 | Gjertsen et al. | Feb 1986 | A |
4578240 | Cadwell | Mar 1986 | A |
4579711 | Mishima et al. | Apr 1986 | A |
4584167 | Carelli | Apr 1986 | A |
4587078 | Azekura et al. | May 1986 | A |
4589929 | Steinberg | May 1986 | A |
4615862 | Huckestein | Oct 1986 | A |
4645642 | Leclercq et al. | Feb 1987 | A |
4652425 | Ferrari et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
4659538 | Leclercq | Apr 1987 | A |
4664880 | Bryan | May 1987 | A |
4666664 | Doshi | May 1987 | A |
4670213 | Wilson et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
4671924 | Gjertsen et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
4671927 | Alsop | Jun 1987 | A |
4678619 | Radkowsky | Jul 1987 | A |
4678627 | Rylatt | Jul 1987 | A |
4678632 | Ferrari | Jul 1987 | A |
4680443 | Vere et al. | Jul 1987 | A |
4684495 | Wilson et al. | Aug 1987 | A |
4684503 | Shallenberger | Aug 1987 | A |
4692304 | Gjertsen | Sep 1987 | A |
4699758 | Shallenberger et al. | Oct 1987 | A |
4699761 | Gjertsen et al. | Oct 1987 | A |
4702883 | Wilson et al. | Oct 1987 | A |
4716015 | Carlson | Dec 1987 | A |
4746488 | Pradal et al. | May 1988 | A |
4749519 | Koehly et al. | Jun 1988 | A |
4749544 | Crowther | Jun 1988 | A |
4762676 | Gjertsen et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
4765909 | Rourke et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
4818474 | Malhouitre et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4820473 | Ohashi et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4828792 | Leclercq et al. | May 1989 | A |
4832905 | Bryan et al. | May 1989 | A |
4842814 | Takase et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
4859400 | Curzon | Aug 1989 | A |
4879086 | Luce et al. | Nov 1989 | A |
4880607 | Horton et al. | Nov 1989 | A |
4900507 | Shallenberger et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
4918710 | Bard | Apr 1990 | A |
4938921 | Mardon et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
4942016 | Marlowe et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
4954293 | Cailly et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
4957695 | Rudolph | Sep 1990 | A |
4968476 | Radkowsky | Nov 1990 | A |
4986957 | Taylor | Jan 1991 | A |
4986960 | Larson | Jan 1991 | A |
4997596 | Proebstle et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5002726 | Johansson | Mar 1991 | A |
5009837 | Nguyen et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5009839 | King | Apr 1991 | A |
5019327 | Fanning et al. | May 1991 | A |
5019333 | Isobe et al. | May 1991 | A |
5024426 | Busch et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5024807 | Hatfield et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5024809 | Taylor | Jun 1991 | A |
5024810 | Bachman | Jun 1991 | A |
5026516 | Taylor | Jun 1991 | A |
5030412 | Yates et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5032351 | Johansson | Jul 1991 | A |
5035869 | Furuya | Jul 1991 | A |
5037605 | Riordan, III | Aug 1991 | A |
5053191 | Bryan et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5069864 | Johansson | Dec 1991 | A |
5073336 | Taylor | Dec 1991 | A |
5085827 | Johansson et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
5089210 | Reese et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
5089220 | Nylund | Feb 1992 | A |
5089221 | Johansson et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
5091145 | Petit | Feb 1992 | A |
5093075 | Chevereau et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5094802 | Riordan, III | Mar 1992 | A |
5110539 | Perrotti et al. | May 1992 | A |
5112571 | Orii et al. | May 1992 | A |
5128097 | Fukasawa | Jul 1992 | A |
5135710 | Grattier et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5135728 | Karraker | Aug 1992 | A |
5136619 | Capossela et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5141701 | Bryan | Aug 1992 | A |
5147597 | Roofthooft et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5147600 | Kadono et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5149491 | Congdon et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5164050 | Bertaud et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5183629 | Canat et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
5186891 | Johansson et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
5188797 | Bryan | Feb 1993 | A |
5192495 | Caldwell et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5194216 | McDaniels, Jr. | Mar 1993 | A |
5200142 | DeMario et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5202085 | Aoyama et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5209899 | Johansson et al. | May 1993 | A |
5211908 | Verdier | May 1993 | A |
5219519 | Matzner | Jun 1993 | A |
5221515 | Thiebaut et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5223211 | Inagaki et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5241570 | Challberg | Aug 1993 | A |
5243635 | Bryan | Sep 1993 | A |
5247550 | Perkins et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5259009 | Patterson et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5259010 | Brown et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5263071 | Farkas et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5265139 | Yanagi et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5267291 | Matzner et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5271053 | Bryan | Dec 1993 | A |
5272741 | Masuhara et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5272742 | Attix et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5274685 | Yates | Dec 1993 | A |
5276721 | Beuerlein | Jan 1994 | A |
5278882 | Garde et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5278883 | Patterson et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5282231 | Adams et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5283812 | Verdier | Feb 1994 | A |
5283821 | Karoutas | Feb 1994 | A |
5286946 | Will | Feb 1994 | A |
5289514 | Lippert et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5297176 | Altman et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5297177 | Inagaki et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5299246 | Bryan | Mar 1994 | A |
5301218 | Taylor, Jr. et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5307393 | Hatfield | Apr 1994 | A |
5328524 | Hertz | Jul 1994 | A |
5340447 | Bertaud et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5341407 | Rosenbaum et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5345483 | Johansson et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5347560 | Lippert et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5349618 | Greenspan | Sep 1994 | A |
5373541 | Mardon et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5375154 | Matzner et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5377246 | Taylor, Jr. et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5383228 | Armijo et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5384814 | Matzner et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5386439 | Leroy et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5386440 | Kashiwai et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5390220 | Zuloaga, Jr. et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5390221 | Dix et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5390222 | Rau et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5403565 | Delloye et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5404383 | Nylund | Apr 1995 | A |
5417780 | Adamson et al. | May 1995 | A |
5420901 | Johansson | May 1995 | A |
5420902 | Dressel et al. | May 1995 | A |
5434897 | Davies | Jul 1995 | A |
5434898 | Barkhurst | Jul 1995 | A |
5436946 | Curulla et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5436947 | Taylor | Jul 1995 | A |
5437747 | Adamson et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5438598 | Attix | Aug 1995 | A |
5440599 | Rodack et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5444748 | Beuchel et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5452334 | Reparaz et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5469481 | Adamson et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5473650 | Johansson | Dec 1995 | A |
5481577 | Yates et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5481578 | Matzner | Jan 1996 | A |
5483564 | Matzner et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5488634 | Johansson et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5488644 | Johansson | Jan 1996 | A |
5490189 | Schechter | Feb 1996 | A |
5490190 | Hopkins et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5517540 | Marlowe et al. | May 1996 | A |
5517541 | Rosenbaum et al. | May 1996 | A |
5519745 | Proebstle et al. | May 1996 | A |
5519746 | Dalke et al. | May 1996 | A |
5519748 | Adamson et al. | May 1996 | A |
5524032 | Adamson et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5526387 | Johansson et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5528640 | Johansson et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5530729 | Gustafsson | Jun 1996 | A |
5538701 | Avens et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5539791 | Garzarolli et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5539792 | Buttner et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5539793 | Johansson et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5546437 | Matzner et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5572560 | Brown | Nov 1996 | A |
5577081 | Yaginuma | Nov 1996 | A |
5578145 | Adamson et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5596615 | Nakamura et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5600694 | Broders | Feb 1997 | A |
5606724 | Wai et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5609697 | Moinard et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5618356 | Adamson et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5620536 | Dahlb ack | Apr 1997 | A |
5622574 | Charquet | Apr 1997 | A |
5648995 | Mardon et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5666389 | Andersson et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5674330 | Charquet et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5675621 | Croteau et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5681404 | Adamson et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5699396 | Taylor | Dec 1997 | A |
5702544 | Mardon et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5711826 | Nordstrom | Jan 1998 | A |
5726418 | Duthoo | Mar 1998 | A |
5727039 | Harmon et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5732116 | Petit | Mar 1998 | A |
5737375 | Radkowsky | Apr 1998 | A |
5740218 | Frederickson et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5748694 | King | May 1998 | A |
5768332 | Van Swam | Jun 1998 | A |
5774514 | Rubbia | Jun 1998 | A |
5774517 | Palavecino et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5778035 | Nylund | Jul 1998 | A |
5787142 | Van Swam | Jul 1998 | A |
5805657 | Heubeck | Sep 1998 | A |
5808271 | Duthoo | Sep 1998 | A |
5826163 | Saraceno et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5832050 | Rebeyrolle et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5838753 | Van Swam et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5844957 | Johannesson et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5852645 | Romary et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5854818 | Van Swam et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5859887 | Richards | Jan 1999 | A |
5864593 | Radkowsky | Jan 1999 | A |
5878100 | Johannesson | Mar 1999 | A |
5892807 | Van Swam | Apr 1999 | A |
5901193 | Dahlback et al. | May 1999 | A |
5926517 | Van Swam | Jul 1999 | A |
5940464 | Mardon et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5949837 | Radkowsky | Sep 1999 | A |
5949839 | Nylund | Sep 1999 | A |
6002735 | Van Swam | Dec 1999 | A |
6010671 | Kimura | Jan 2000 | A |
6026136 | Radkowsky | Feb 2000 | A |
6033493 | Hertz et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6088420 | Yokoyama | Jul 2000 | A |
6110437 | Schall et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6130927 | Kang et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6167105 | Yoon et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6192098 | Van Swam | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6205196 | Yamashita et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6226342 | Micko et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6228337 | Ioffe | May 2001 | B1 |
6229868 | Nylund et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6236701 | Nylund | May 2001 | B1 |
6236702 | Chun et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6243433 | Adamson et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6278757 | Yokomizo et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6278759 | Yoon et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6310931 | Gustafsson et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6320924 | Croteau | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6327324 | Nylund | Dec 2001 | B2 |
6339205 | Nakayama | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6385271 | Nylund | May 2002 | B2 |
6393087 | Oh et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6400788 | Hirano et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6421407 | Kang et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6429403 | Nakayama | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6434209 | Groeneveld et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6473482 | Steinke | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6488783 | King et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6516043 | Chaki et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6519309 | Van Swam | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6522710 | Smith et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6539073 | Smith et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6542566 | Adamson et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6542567 | Mayet et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6544361 | Diz et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6608880 | Smith et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6608881 | Oh et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6621885 | Brichet | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6665366 | Aujollet et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6690758 | Elkins | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6707872 | Yoon et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6714619 | Oh et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6721384 | Oh et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6728329 | Hirano et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6744842 | Schmidt et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6758917 | King et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6807246 | Kim et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6819733 | Broders et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6845138 | Chun et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6847695 | Kageyama et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6863745 | Charquet et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6884304 | Charquet | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6888911 | Stabel-Weinheimer et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6888912 | Morel et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6901128 | Mori et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6909766 | Kido et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6925138 | Nakamaru et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6934350 | Challberg et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6943315 | Cho et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6960326 | Webb et al. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6991731 | Koegler | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7037390 | Miyahara et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7085340 | Goldenfield et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7087206 | Bond et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7127024 | Garzarolli et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7169370 | Mesmin et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7192563 | Singh et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7195745 | Brandel et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7309473 | Caranoni et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7323153 | Amamoto et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
20020075988 | Hirano | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020080908 | Nakamaru et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020122762 | Fukasawa et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20030026381 | Ukai et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20050031067 | Mori et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050069075 | D'Auvergne | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050105677 | Yoon et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050157836 | Broach et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050226358 | Bonnamour et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050238131 | Hellandbrand et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060045231 | Lee et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060153327 | Jiang et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060171498 | D'Auvergne | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060233685 | Janes | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060251205 | Balog | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060283790 | Elkins et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070036260 | Fetterman et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070080328 | Zavodchikov et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070133734 | Fawcett et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070165766 | Aleshin et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070183556 | Labarriere et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070201605 | Ishii et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070206717 | Conner et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070211843 | Smith et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070242793 | Song et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080013667 | Oh et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080130820 | Ukai et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080144762 | Holden et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080152068 | Aktas et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080152069 | Aktas et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080179042 | Evans et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20090252278 | Bashkirtsev et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20110311016 | Bashkirtsev | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20130114777 | Goszczynski | May 2013 | A1 |
20130322591 | Bashkirtsev et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20160035441 | Totemeier | Feb 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
86108810 | Aug 1987 | CN |
1192820 | Sep 1998 | CN |
1230280 | Sep 1999 | CN |
1351352 | May 2002 | CN |
1945751 | Apr 2007 | CN |
101299351 | Nov 2008 | CN |
102301430 | Dec 2011 | CN |
102543224 | Jul 2012 | CN |
102947890 | Feb 2013 | CN |
1464481 | Jan 1969 | DE |
1514124 | Sep 1969 | DE |
0080853 | Jun 1983 | EP |
0620558 | Oct 1994 | EP |
0871958 | Oct 1998 | EP |
2 372 717 | Oct 2011 | EP |
1444002 | Jul 1966 | FR |
2632657 | Dec 1989 | FR |
853511 | Nov 1960 | GB |
876 021 | Aug 1961 | GB |
876399 | Aug 1961 | GB |
887713 | Jan 1962 | GB |
904 140 | Aug 1962 | GB |
920343 | Mar 1963 | GB |
1 031 678 | Jun 1966 | GB |
1043782 | Sep 1966 | GB |
1068964 | May 1967 | GB |
1 126 396 | Sep 1968 | GB |
1 282 767 | Jul 1972 | GB |
1-287-767 | Sep 1972 | GB |
2229172 | Sep 1990 | GB |
34-001962 | Feb 1956 | JP |
S38-005344 | May 1963 | JP |
S39-009943 | Jun 1964 | JP |
S41-002279 | Feb 1966 | JP |
S41-021399 | Dec 1966 | JP |
S42-012028 | Jul 1967 | JP |
S43-020223 | Aug 1968 | JP |
58-021194 | Feb 1983 | JP |
58 187891 | Nov 1983 | JP |
59-23830 | Feb 1984 | JP |
S62-168091 | Jul 1987 | JP |
63-134520 | Jun 1988 | JP |
2018328 | Jan 1990 | JP |
H02 66494 | Mar 1990 | JP |
2221893 | Nov 1990 | JP |
H06-094869 | Apr 1994 | JP |
H-06-201872 | Jul 1994 | JP |
11-183674 | Jul 1999 | JP |
11-508367 | Jul 1999 | JP |
H11-511553 | Oct 1999 | JP |
11-352272 | Dec 1999 | JP |
3094195 | Oct 2000 | JP |
2001-500265 | Jan 2001 | JP |
2002-122687 | Apr 2002 | JP |
2003-248079 | Sep 2003 | JP |
2004-020463 | Jan 2004 | JP |
2006-284487 | Oct 2006 | JP |
2007-507700 | Mar 2007 | JP |
2007-507702 | Mar 2007 | JP |
2008-170454 | Jul 2008 | JP |
04-303796 | Jul 2009 | JP |
2009-162739 | Jul 2009 | JP |
2011-508877 | Mar 2011 | JP |
2012-514197 | Jun 2012 | JP |
100654961 | Dec 2006 | KR |
10-2010-0129798 | Dec 2010 | KR |
2170956 | Jul 2001 | RU |
2176826 | Dec 2001 | RU |
2222837 | Jan 2004 | RU |
2246142 | Feb 2005 | RU |
2267175 | Dec 2005 | RU |
2294570 | Feb 2007 | RU |
2 389 089 | May 2010 | RU |
2389089 | May 2010 | RU |
WO-1985001826 | Apr 1985 | WO |
WO-9316477 | Aug 1993 | WO |
WO-9708711 | Mar 1997 | WO |
WO-2002010074 | Feb 2002 | WO |
WO-2009082254 | Jul 2009 | WO |
WO-2010074592 | Jul 2010 | WO |
WO-2011143293 | Nov 2011 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Notice of Reasons for Rejection dated Oct. 7, 2014 in related Japanese Patent Application No. 2011-543460. |
Reasons for Rejection dated Dec. 24, 2014 in Korean Patent Application No. 10-2011-7016736. |
Notice of Reasons for Rejection dated Feb. 3, 2015 in Japanese Patent Application No. 2013-510271. |
Translation of Examination Report dated Jan. 20, 2015 in Ukranian Patent Application No. a201213992. |
Decision for Grant and Partial English Translation dated Apr. 28, 2015 in Japanese Patent Application No. 2011-543460. |
Notice of Reasons for Rejection and Organized Translation dated Nov. 4, 2015 in Japanese Patent Application No. 2013-510271. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Sep. 15, 2014 in International Patent Application No. PCT/US2014/036437. |
Notice of Allowance dated Feb. 22, 2016 in Chinese Patent Application No. 201180023785.9. |
Decision of Grant (and partial English translation) dated Mar. 15, 2016 in Japanese Patent Application No. 2014-114955. |
Notice of Reasons for Rejection (and English translation) dated Mar. 15, 2016 in Japanese Patent Application No. 2015-094071. |
Bol'sakov et al., “Experimental study of burnout in channels with twisted Fuel rods,” Thermal Engineering, vol. 54, No. 5, 2007, pp. 386-389. |
Buongiorno et al., Core Design Options for High Power Density BWRs (MIT-NFC-PR-089), Nuclear Fuel Cycle (NFC) Technology and Policy Program, Dec. 2006. |
Buongiorno et al., Core Design Options for High Power Density BWRs (MIT-NFC-PR-097), Nuclear Fuel Cycle (NFC) Technology and Policy Program, Nov. 2007. |
Buongiorno et al., Core Design Options for High Power Density BWRs (MIT-NFC-PR-102), Nuclear Fuel Cycle (NFC) Technology and Policy Program, Sep. 2008. |
Canadian Office Action dated Mar. 12, 2014 in related Canadian Patent Application No. 2,710,432. |
Carpenter et al., High Performance Fuel Design for Next Generation PWRs: Final Report (MIT-NFC-PR-082), Nuclear Fuel Cycle (NFC) Technology and Policy Program, Jan. 2006. |
Chinese Office Action dated Aug. 19, 2013 in related Chinese Patent Application No. 200880132741.8. |
Diakov, C., “Feasibility of converting Russian icebreaker reactors from HEU to LEU fuel,” Science and Global Security, vol. 14, pp. 33-48, Routledge Taylor & Francia Group, 2006. |
European Search Report issued in European Patent Application No. 08172834 dated Aug. 19, 2009. |
European Search Report issued in European Patent Application No. 10166457 dated Aug. 11, 2010. |
Examination Report dated Feb. 14, 2014 in related Australian Patent Application No. 2011250906. |
Examination Report dated Sep. 17, 2013 in related Australian Application No. 2008365658. |
Halber et al., “Energy Futures,” MIT Energy Initiative, 2009, ISSN 1942-4671, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, pp. 5-7. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability issued in International Application No. PCT/RU2008/000801 dated Jul. 5, 2011. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability issued in International Application No. PCT/US2011/035859 dated Nov. 22, 2012. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability issued in International Application No. PCT/US2012/020878 dated Aug. 25, 2013. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in International Application No. PCT/US2011/036034 dated Sep. 21, 2011. |
International Search Report issued in International Application No. PCT/RU2007/000732 dated Jul. 10, 2008. |
International Search Report issued in International Application No. PCT/RU2008/000801 dated Sep. 3, 2009. |
Japanese Office Action dated Oct. 1, 2013 in related Japanese Patent Application No. 2011-543460. |
Korean Office Action dated Feb. 25, 2014 in related Korean Patent Application No. 10-2010-7016627. |
Korean Office Action dated Feb. 25, 2014 in related Korean Patent Application No. 10-2010-7026035. |
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/139,677 dated Mar. 10, 2014. |
Supplementary European Search Report issued in European Patent Application No. 08879222.1 dated Apr. 16, 2013. |
International Search Report dated Feb. 10, 2016 in International Patent Application No. PCT/US2015/050454. |
Written Opinion dated Feb. 10, 2016 in International Patent Application No. PCT/US2015/050454. |
Extended European Search Report dated May 4, 2016 in European Patent Application No. 16153633.9. |
Japanese Decision for Grant dated Aug. 2, 2016 in Japanese Patent Application No. 2013-510271. |
Japanese Decision for Grant dated Aug. 2, 2016 in Japanese Patent Application No. 2015-094071. |
Chinese Office Action and English Translation dated Nov. 28, 2016 in Chinese Patent Application No. 201480036401.0. |
Notification of Reasons for Refusal dated Jun. 5, 2017 in Japanese Patent Application No. 2016-171063. |
Akabori, “Interdiffusion in the U—Zr system at δ-phase compositions,” Journal of Alloys and Compounds 271-273 (1998), pp. 597-601. |
Kouhsen, “Preparation and Thermochemical Stability of Uranium-Zirconium-Carbonitrides,” Journal of Nuclear Materials 61 (1976), pp. 88-98. |
Simnad, “The U—ZrHx Alloy: Its Properties and use in TRIGA Fuel,” Nuclear Engineering and Design 64 (1981), pp. 403-422. |
Office Action dated Mar. 10, 2017 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/695,792. |
First Office Action dated Jun. 2, 2017 in Chinese Patent Application No. 2016102180563. |
Patent Search Report dated May 24, 2017 in Chinese Patent Application No. 2016102180563. |
Office Action dated Oct. 18, 2017 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/856,084. |
Tayal et al., “A 61-Element Fuel Design (HAC) For Very High Burnups,” Conference on CANDU Fuel, Oct. 1995, (1995), pp. 5A-20-5A-30. |
Conboy et al., “Experimental Investigation of Hydraulics and Lateral Mixing for Helical-Cruciform Fuel Rod Assemblies,” Nuclear Technology, vol. 182, Jun. 2013, (2013), pp. 259-273. |
Notification of Reasons for Refusal issued in counterpart Japanese Patent Application No. 2016-512961 dated Oct. 24, 2017. |
Office Action dated Mar. 8, 2018 in U.S. Appl. No. 14/856,084. |
Conboy, “Thermal-Hydraulic Analysis of Cross-Shaped Spiral Fuel in High Power Density BWRs,” Doctoral Dissertation, MIT, 2007. |
Decision to Grant Patent issued in counterpart Japanese Patent Application No. 2016-512961 dated Jun. 5, 2018. |
Notice of Submission of Opinion on Revocation issued in counterpart Korean Patent Application No. 10-2012-7029003 dated Sep. 4, 2018. |
Feng, “Innovative Fuel Designs for High Power Density Pressurized Water Reactor”, MIT, 2005, pp. 1-259. [Notice of Submission in counterpart Korean Patent Application No. 10-2012-7029003, dated Sep. 4, 2018]. |
Koo, et al., “Behavior of unirradiated Zr based uranium metal fuel under reactivity initiated accident conditions”, Nuclear Engineering and Design, 238, pp. 1592-1600, 2008 [Notice of Submission in counterpart Korean Patent Application No. 10-2012-7029003, dated Sep. 4, 2018]. |
Lee et al., “Thermal stability of co-extruded U-Zr/Zr-Nb alloys”, Journal of Nuclear Materials, 373, pp. 275-279, 2008 [Notice of Submission in counterpart Korean Patent Application No. 10-2012-7029003, dated Sep. 4, 2018]. |
McDeavitt et al., “Thoria-Based Cermet Nuclear Fuel: Cermet Fabrication and Behavior Estimates”, 10th International Conference on Nuclear Engineering, 2002, pp. 1-10 [Notice of Submission in counterpart Korean Patent Application No. 10-2012-7029003, dated Sep. 4, 2018]. |
Van Duyn, “Evaluation of the Mechanical Behavior of a Metal-Matrix Dispersion Fuel for Plutonium Burning”, Georgia Institute of Technology, 2003, pp. 1-126 [Reasons in counterpart Korean Patent Application No. 10-2012-7029003, dated Sep. 4, 2018]. |
Notice of Submission of Opinion issued in counterpart Korean Application No. 10-2017-7024393 dated Sep. 28, 2018. |
Reasons of Request for Revocation in counterpart Korean Patent Application No. 10-2012-7029003, received Sep. 12, 2018. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140334595 A1 | Nov 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61821918 | May 2013 | US |