The present invention is directed generally to fuel cell systems and specifically to mechanical components of the fuel cell systems.
Rapid and inexpensive installation can help to increase the prevalence of fuel cell systems. Installation costs for pour in place custom designed concrete pads, which generally require trenching for plumbing and electrical lines, can become prohibitive. Installation time is also a problem in the case of most sites since concrete pours and trenches generally require one or more building permits and building inspector reviews.
Furthermore, stationary fuel cell systems may be installed in location where the cost of real estate is quite high or the available space is limited (e.g., a loading dock, a narrow alley or space between buildings, etc.). The fuel cell system installation should have a high utilization of available space. When a considerable amount of stand-off space is required for access to the system via doors and the like, installation real estate costs increase significantly.
When the number of fuel cell systems to be installed on a site increases, one problem which generally arises is that stand-off space between these systems is required (to allow for maintenance of one unit or the other unit). The space between systems is lost in terms of it's potential to be used by the customer of the fuel cell system.
In the case of some fuel cell system designs, these problems are resolved by increasing the overall capacity of the monolithic system design. However, this creates new challenges as the size and weight of the concrete pad required increases. Therefore, this strategy tends to increase the system installation time. Furthermore, as the minimum size of the system increases, the fault tolerance of the design is reduced.
The fuel cell stacks or columns of the fuel cell systems are usually located in hot boxes (i.e., thermally insulated containers). The hot boxes of existing large stationary fuel cell systems are housed in cabinets, housings or enclosures. The terms cabinet, enclosure and housing are used interchangeably herein. The cabinets are usually made from metal. The metal is painted with either automotive or industrial powder coat paint, which is susceptible to scratching, denting and corrosion. Most of these cabinets are similar to current industrial HVAC equipment cabinets.
A modular fuel cell system includes a base, at least four power modules arranged in a row on the base, and a fuel processing module and power conditioning module arranged on at least one end of the row on the base. Each power module includes a separate cabinet which contains at least one fuel cell stack located in a hot box. The power modules are electrically and fluidly connected to the at least one fuel processing and power conditioning modules through the base.
It is to be understood that both the foregoing general description and the following detailed description are exemplary and explanatory only, and are not restrictive of the invention as claimed.
Modular System
Referring to
The modular fuel cell system enclosure 10 includes at least one (preferably more than one or plurality) of power modules 12, one or more fuel input (i.e., fuel processing) modules 16, and one or more power conditioning (i.e., electrical output) modules 18. In embodiments, the power conditioning modules 18 are configured to deliver direct current (DC). In alternative embodiments, the power conditioning modules 18 are configured to deliver alternating current (AC). In these embodiments, the power condition modules include a mechanism to convert DC to AC, such as an inverter. For example, the system enclosure may include any desired number of modules, such as 2-30 power modules, for example 3-12 power modules, such as 6-12 modules.
Each power module 12 is configured to house one or more hot boxes 13. Each hot box contains one or more stacks or columns of fuel cells (not shown for clarity), such as one or more stacks or columns of solid oxide fuel cells having a ceramic oxide electrolyte separated by conductive interconnect plates. Other fuel cell types, such as PEM, molten carbonate, phosphoric acid, etc. may also be used.
The fuel cell stacks may comprise externally and/or internally manifolded stacks. For example, the stacks may be internally manifolded for fuel and air with fuel and air risers extending through openings in the fuel cell layers and/or in the interconnect plates between the fuel cells.
Alternatively, the fuel cell stacks may be internally manifolded for fuel and externally manifolded for air, where only the fuel inlet and exhaust risers extend through openings in the fuel cell layers and/or in the interconnect plates between the fuel cells, as described in U.S. Pat. No. 7,713,649, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. The fuel cells may have a cross flow (where air and fuel flow roughly perpendicular to each other on opposite sides of the electrolyte in each fuel cell), counter flow parallel (where air and fuel flow roughly parallel to each other but in opposite directions on opposite sides of the electrolyte in each fuel cell) or co-flow parallel (where air and fuel flow roughly parallel to each other in the same direction on opposite sides of the electrolyte in each fuel cell) configuration.
The modular fuel cell system enclosure 10 also contains one or more input or fuel processing modules 16. This module 16 includes a cabinet which contains the components used for pre-processing of fuel, such as adsorption beds (e.g., desulfurizer and/or other impurity adsorption) beds. The fuel processing modules 16 may be designed to process different types of fuel. For example, a diesel fuel processing module, a natural gas fuel processing module, and an ethanol fuel processing module may be provided in the same or in separate cabinets. A different bed composition tailored for a particular fuel may be provided in each module. The processing module(s) 16 may process at least one of the following fuels selected from natural gas provided from a pipeline, compressed natural gas, methane, propane, liquid petroleum gas, gasoline, diesel, home heating oil, kerosene, JP-5, JP-8, aviation fuel, hydrogen, ammonia, ethanol, methanol, syn-gas, bio-gas, bio-diesel and other suitable hydrocarbon or hydrogen containing fuels. If desired, a reformer 17 may be located in the fuel processing module 16. Alternatively, if it is desirable to thermally integrate the reformer 17 with the fuel cell stack(s), then a separate reformer 17 may be located in each hot box 13 in a respective power module 12. Furthermore, if internally reforming fuel cells are used, then an external reformer 17 may be omitted entirely.
The modular fuel cell system enclosure 10 also contains one or more power conditioning modules 18. The power conditioning module 18 includes a cabinet which contains the components for converting the fuel cell stack generated DC power to AC power (e.g., DC/DC and DC/AC converters described in U.S. Pat. No. 7,705,490, incorporated herein by reference in its entirety), electrical connectors for AC power output to the grid, circuits for managing electrical transients, a system controller (e.g., a computer or dedicated control logic device or circuit). The power conditioning module 18 may be designed to convert DC power from the fuel cell modules to different AC voltages and frequencies. Designs for 208V, 60 Hz; 480V, 60 Hz; 415V, 50 Hz and other common voltages and frequencies may be provided.
The fuel processing module 16 and the power conditioning module 18 may be housed in one input/output cabinet 14. If a single input/output cabinet 14 is provided, then modules 16 and 18 may be located vertically (e.g., power conditioning module 18 components above the fuel processing module 16 desulfurizer canisters/beds) or side by side in the cabinet 14.
As shown in one exemplary embodiment in
The linear array of power modules 12 is readily scaled. For example, more or fewer power modules 12 may be provided depending on the power needs of the building or other facility serviced by the fuel cell system 10. The power modules 12 and input/output modules 14 may also be provided in other ratios. For example, in other exemplary embodiments, more or fewer power modules 12 may be provided adjacent to the input/output module 14. Further, the support functions could be served by more than one input/output module 14 (e.g., with a separate fuel processing module 16 and power conditioning module 18 cabinets). Additionally, while in the preferred embodiment, the input/output module 14 is at the end of the row of power modules 12, it could also be located in the center of a row power modules 12.
The modular fuel cell system enclosure 10 may be configured in a way to ease servicing of the system. All of the routinely or high serviced components (such as the consumable components) may be placed in a single module to reduce amount of time required for the service person. For example, a purge gas (optional) and desulfurizer material for a natural gas fueled system may be placed in a single module (e.g., a fuel processing module 16 or a combined input/output module 14 cabinet). This would be the only module cabinet accessed during routine maintenance. Thus, each module 12, 14, 16, and 18 may be serviced, repaired or removed from the system without opening the other module cabinets and without servicing, repairing or removing the other modules.
For example, as described above, the enclosure 10 can include multiple power modules 12. When at least one power module 12 is taken off line (i.e., no power is generated by the stacks in the hot box 13 in the off line module 12), the remaining power modules 12, the fuel processing module 16 and the power conditioning module 18 (or the combined input/output module 14) are not taken off line. Furthermore, the fuel cell enclosure 10 may contain more than one of each type of module 12, 14, 16, or 18. When at least one module of a particular type is taken off line, the remaining modules of the same type are not taken off line.
Thus, in a system comprising a plurality of modules, each of the modules 12, 14, 16, or 18 may be electrically disconnected, removed from the fuel cell enclosure 10 and/or serviced or repaired without stopping an operation of the other modules in the system, allowing the fuel cell system to continue to generate electricity. The entire fuel cell system does not have to be shut down if one stack of fuel cells in one hot box 13 malfunctions or is taken off line for servicing.
Pre-Cast Base
Referring now to
Existing fuel cell systems may connect various modules with electrical wires that are run through rubber seal panels that keep the rain out. The hot gasses (e.g., fuel and air inlet and outlet streams) are provided to and from the fuel cell stacks through conduits, such as pipes and manifolds.
According to an exemplary embodiment, the pre-cast base 20 is formed to include channels (e.g. trenches, depressions, slots, etc.) to receive electrical bus bar conduits 24, input and output fuel conduits 27 and water conduit(s) 28 to and from the system and/or between the modules. A first channel 22 houses the electrical bus bar 24, which provides bus connections to the power modules 12 and input/output module(s) 14. As shown in the Figures, the bus bar 24 may be a laminated bus bar with a segmented design or a section of a cable. A second channel 26 houses the header for fuel supply conduit 27 and the header for the water supply conduit 28. Quick connects/disconnects couple the conduits 27 and 28 to the fuel and water inlets in each module 12 and 14, as described for example in U.S. application Ser. No. 12/458,355, filed on Jul. 8, 2009 and incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. By providing the bus bar conduits 24 and fluid conduits 27, 28 in channels in the pre-cast base 20, the fuel cell modules 12 and/or 14 themselves protect the bus or header connections from the elements. Additional channels may be formed in the base 20 to house other components, such as communication lines, or to provide water drainage features to ensure water is directed as desired for good system integration. Further, the first and second channels 22, 26 and other features of the pre-cast base 20 may be formed in a mirrored configuration. In this manner, the system can be assembled with plural power modules 12 in a mirrored configuration, simplifying assembly and maintenance.
The precast base 20 may include beveled structures to allow the fuel cell modules 12 and 14 to self-align to the pre-cast base 20 and plumbing and wiring structures (e.g. quick connects/disconnects for the conduits 24, 27 and 28). According to one exemplary embodiment, the self-alignment feature may comprise an angled latch mechanism as described in U.S. application Ser. No. 12/458,355, filed on Jul. 8, 2009 and incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. In another exemplary embodiment, the self alignment feature may comprise a cone mounted or integrally formed with the pre-cast base 20, similar to the features described in U.S. application Ser. No. 12/458,355. The cone is configured to be received in a corresponding indentation on the base of the fuel cell system modules 12 and 14 which to ensure proper alignment as the modules 12 and 14 are lowered to the base.
Unlike concrete bases that are poured on-site, a pre-cast base 20 can include all features necessary for the site installation. The design for the pre-cast base 20 can be pre-approved by a civil engineer, significantly reducing review time by local authorities when the base 20 is installed. The pre-cast base 20 simplifies site preparation and installation by eliminating the need for trenching for fuel, water and electricity during site preparation. However, in an alternative embodiment, the base 20 with channels may be poured on the site where the fuel cell system will operate.
Door Materials And Appearance
Because of the significant size of the fuel cell stack hot boxes, large stationary fuel cell system cabinets have large cabinet doors. The doors may be one to three meters tall by one to three meters wide and made of metal, such as steel or aluminum. The large dimensions of the doors result in higher mechanical loading requirements on the cabinet, increased door weight and increased difficulty of handing the doors. Furthermore, the large doors require a large amount of wasted stand off space between each cabinet and an adjacent structure (e.g., building, another cabinet, etc.) to allow the side hinged door to swing open.
A conventional door opening mechanism (such as a left or right-sided hinged mechanism) would leave the opened door in a position that could hinder access to the inside of the cabinet, especially in a narrow space, such as an alley, or leave the door in a position that could expose it to damage from other doors or equipment. Furthermore, hinging a door from the side could contribute to door-sag from its own weight and dimensions. An additional issue faced when designing a fuel cell cabinet for outdoor operation is the integrity of the weather seal at each door interface. The seal must be positively assured in order to eliminate the reliability impact of water and foreign material entry to the cabinet.
Furthermore, the doors may be constructed from many parts due to the multiple functions that a door performs, such as protecting the fuel cell hot box from the environment, providing a thermal barrier between the outside of the hot box and the ambient, housing the air filters, providing mounting locations for latches, hinges, and seals, etc. The large amount of parts may impact the quality and placement accuracy of the door.
Referring now to
According to an exemplary embodiment, the access doors 30 for the modules 12 and 14 are formed of at least one inner portion 32 and at least one outer portion 34. The inner portion 32 forms a framework for the door 30 and includes features to allow the door 30 to be coupled to the module 12 or 14. The outer portion 34 is coupled to the inner portion 32 and provides an outer fascia for the door 30. In a preferred embodiment, the outer portion 34 is formed of a polymeric material and the inner portion 32 is formed of a metal material.
By forming the outer portion 34 of the door 30 at least partially with polymeric components, the building and painting costs, overall weight, and exterior heat loading can be reduced and the dent resistance of the door 30 can be increased. Flame resistance per UL 746C can be included for the material of the outer portion 34 when needed for specific applications.
In one exemplary embodiment, the entire door 30 is injection molded as a single structure. The injection molded door 30 incorporates as many features as possible to reduce total part count, provide mounting points, and simplify production of high quality parts. The mold for such a molded door can be configured to allow two different plastics to be co-injected into the same mold, such that the inner side of the door (i.e., the side which faces into the cabinet when closed) is made from a heat and flame resistant plastic sheet, while the outer side of the door is made from a plastic sheet that is weather resistant and aesthetically pleasing without possessing the flame and high temperature resistance. An air filter may be located between the inner and outer portions of the door.
According to another exemplary embodiment, the door 30 is formed with a vacuum thermoforming process. A sheet can first be formed with co-extrusion of two or more plastics that meet UL and cosmetic requirements. The co-extruded sheet can then be vacuum thermoformed to form the door 30.
Because high temperature fuel cells (e.g. SOFCs) operate at high temperatures, door 30 may be formed to have materials or features to increase the flame resistance of the door 30. If there is no risk of flame or extreme heat exposure, then a standard, low cost, color plastic material can be used to form the door 30. If there is a low risk of flame, additives can be mixed with the standard plastic while maintaining exterior quality of the door 30. For example, co-injection can be used to mold the exterior (e.g., the outer portion 34) using the standard plastic and the interior (e.g., the inner portion 32) using the required UL746C flame resistant plastic. A single, co-injection mold with inserts to allow for needed features can be used to form the door. According to other exemplary embodiments, when flame resistance is needed per UL746C, the door 30 may feature another type of flame retardant feature on its surface (e.g., a flame retardant coating added to the inner surface of the door 30; a separate, flexible flame retardant layer such as cloth is provided over the inner surface of the door; a separate, rigid flame retardant layer such as an extruded flat plastic; etc.).
The polymer outer portion 34 can be molded or otherwise formed in a variety of colors, eliminating the need for paint. The polymer outer portion 34 may be dent resistant and graffiti resistant. The polymer outer portion 34 may be scratch resistant and any scratches that do occur will be less visible than similar scratches on a metal body and will not cause associated corrosion problems. Further, the outer portion 34 can include additional parts and features that are integrally molded, such as molded in filter housings, and inserted fasteners to promote easier, faster, more accurate assembly of the door 30 and installation of the doors 30 on the modules 12 and 14.
A logo 36 (
A polymer outer portion 34 can reduce costs by reducing manual labor and material needed for construction of the door 30. Forming the outer portion 34 with a process such as injection molding allows for highly repeatability for better fit and easier assembly of the door 30. A polymer material is lighter than a corresponding part formed of a metal material allowing for easier handling, lifting, and reduced shipping costs.
Filter Assembly
Fuel system cabinets generally include filtration systems to filter incoming cooling air that passes through the cabinet. In high-dust environments, multi-layered filters can quickly become clogged and require frequent changes. Pneumatic back flush filters only work when the air intake is shut down and generally do not work well constant run, always-on fuel cell systems. Water curtain filters, in which a curtain of falling water removes particles form air passing through the water, requires power and water flow, which complicates the operation of the system. Such systems require a water filter for a closed system or a constant water supply for open systems.
The door 30 may include one or more air filters 40 as shown in
As shown in
The door may further include a rough or initial filtering mechanism, such as one or more perforated screens 46, as shown in
Additional, optional, non-limiting features of the air filtration system of a door 30 are shown in
Air (shown by arrows in
The outer portion 34 of the door 30 is configured to be hinged outward relative to the inner door 32 (see
One or more frame members 38 holding the filters 40 can be configured to pivot outward or to allow only the filters 40 to pivot outward as shown in
The shape of the door inlet 42 is preferably such that the air inlet area is not directly visible from the front of the door and the front of the module, thereby improving the aesthetic of the appearance of the fuel cell system. At the same time, since the inlet 42 extends along the full vertical left and right edges of the door 30, inlet pressure drop is diminished, reducing the parasitic power draw of the system. Further, since the air inlets 42 may be located on both the left and right sides of the door 30, if there is a systematic bias in environmental foreign material (such as may occur with snow or sand drifts or other windblown debris), one of the two sides will effectively be in the “lee” (i.e., downstream) of the oncoming wind, and thereby be significantly more free of foreign material allowing the unit to operate without obstruction even in severe storm conditions.
The configuration of the door 30 as shown in
Intake Louver
Referring now to
The baffles 47 may comprise strips or rails which are alternatively attached to the inner 32 and outer 34 portions of the door 30, in a roughly interdigitated arrangement (e.g., with baffles attached to opposite portions 32, 34 of the door overlapping or not overlapping in the door thickness direction from outer portion 34 to inner portion 32). The baffles 47 may extend the entire or just a part of the vertical height of the door 30. In general, the baffles 47 may be arranged in any suitable configuration which prevents the air inlet stream from travelling in a straight line from inlet 42 to outlet 44 and forces the air inlet stream to travel a serpentine path from inlet 42 to outlet 44.
The foreign material (dust, sand, mist, etc.) in the air stream has momentum which causes it to continue moving forward while the air changes direction around the baffles 47. The dust and sand collects in the corners (e.g., at the upstream baffle surface) formed by the baffles 47 and drains out of the door through openings 48 in the bottom of the door 30. Air with significant reductions of dust and dirt exits the louver assembly through outlet 44.
The intake louver of
Door Assembly
As noted above, because of the significant size of the fuel cell stack hot boxes, large stationary fuel cell system cabinets have large cabinet doors. The large dimensions of the doors result in higher mechanical loading requirements on the cabinet, increased door weight and increased difficulty of handing the doors. Furthermore, the large doors require a large amount of wasted stand off space between each cabinet and an adjacent structure (e.g., building, another cabinet, etc.) to allow the side hinged door to swing open.
Conventional door opening mechanisms have left or right-sided hinges. These open in a sideways direction pivoting on a hinge which would pivot from a side edge. This conventional door opening mechanism leave the opened door in a position that could hinder access to the inside of the cabinet, especially in a narrow space, such as an alley, or leave the door in a position that could expose it to damage from other doors or equipment. Furthermore, hinging a door from the side could contribute to door-sag from its own weight and dimensions. An additional issue faced when designing a fuel cell cabinet for outdoor operation is the integrity of the weather seal at each door interface. The seal must be positively assured in order to eliminate the reliability impact of water and foreign material entry to the cabinet.
Referring to
Another prior art door panel configuration involves removable cabinet doors. With such designs, when a fuel cell system is being serviced, the door panel is removed and set to the side. In the case of large scale stationary fuel cell generators, removable doors are generally not employed because lifting off a large and heavy door assembly would generally require two field service personnel.
According to an exemplary embodiment, the inner portion 32 and the outer portion 34 of the door 30 open in tandem with a substantially vertical and then substantially horizontal swing (e.g., “gull-wing” style). In other words, the door 30 opens by being moved up and then at least partially over the top of the enclosure 10 in a substantially horizontal direction. The terms substantially vertical and substantially horizontal of this embodiment include a deviation of 0 to 30 degrees, such as 0 to 10 degrees from exact vertical and horizontal directions, respectively.
The door 30 is mounted on to walls of the enclosure or cabinet 10 of the module 12 or 14 with plural independent mechanical arms, such as two arms 50 and two arms 54.
The first arm 50 includes a first, generally straight end 51 and a second, generally curved end 52. The second arm 54 includes a first, generally curved end 55 and a second, generally straight end 56. The second arm 54 is longer than the first arm and has a more pronounced curvature at one end. The ends 51 and 55 are coupled to the interior surface of a wall of the enclosure 10 at a fixed distance relative to each other. The ends 52 and 56 are coupled to the door 30 at a fixed distance relative to each other. End 51 is located closer to the door than end 55. End 52 is located above end 56 on the door.
The angle of attack for the door 30 as it is opening and closing and a change in the vertical position when closed and horizontal position when open can be adjusted by changing the location of the pivot points on the door 30 and on the enclosure 10 or by adjusting the shape and/or length of the arms 50 and 54.
Biasing members 58, such as springs, may be added to assist in opening the door, as shown in
As shown in
Further, in the open position shown in
Door Latch Mechanism
Prior art door latch mechanisms of fuel cell system cabinets often make use of a small compression latch, typically attached directly to a key. In these, when the door is large, significant force must be applied to the door in a “pushing” fashion in order to achieve gasket set and to allow the latch to close.
Referring now to
To lock the door 30, the door is first swung back down into the closed position, as shown in
In another exemplary embodiment, the latch 60 may include an electrical actuator to release the latch to allow the door to open. The electrical actuator can be configured to allow either remote control opening of the door 30 (by the remote monitoring command center), or opening of the door 30 by an encoded signal from a hand-carried device such as an electronic key carried by a field service engineer.
Positioning Hot Box In Power Module
The internal components of the power module 12 may need to be periodically removed, such as to be serviced, repaired or replaced. Conventionally, the components, such as the hot box or the balance of plant components are removed from the power module 12 with a forklift. While conventional fuel cell assemblies may require substantial space on all sides to position a forklift and remove the components from an enclosure, sometimes as much as four to five times the length of the hot box.
As shown in
Referring to
As shown in
As shown in
As shown in
Desulfurizer Assembly
Referring now to
Prior art fuel cell systems often use two large, cylindrical desulfurizer canisters in series. Each canister contains a desulfurizer material bed which removes sulfur from the inlet fuel stream being provided to the fuel cells. When the sulfur is expected to have broken through the bed in the first canister, both canisters are exchanged for a new set of canisters or the desulfurizer material bed is replaced in both canisters. However, the second canister or second desulfurizer material bed is replaced before being completely used up because the second bed still has the ability to adsorb more sulfur. In other words, as trace amounts of sulfur species begin to break through the first bed, the additional capacity to adsorb higher sulfur concentrations is never utilized in the second bed. Thus, underused bed material is discarded, leading to a higher system cost.
Referring to
The canisters 82 are generally rectangular prismatic bodies with a beveled edge 83. The beveled edge 83 helps to properly orient the canister 82 on the rotatable pad 84. The beveled edge 83 further allows for better space utilization when rotating all four canisters 82 together by eliminating a corner of the canister 82 that would otherwise extend beyond the rotatable pad 84 and interfere with the rotation of the desulfurizer assembly 80. Tall, narrow canisters 82 allow for use of a deeper, more narrow cabinet space in the input/output module 14.
Referring to
The desulfurizer assembly 80 may further contain a sulfur sensor or detector to detect sulfur that has broken through the final canister 82 in the series. Having four canisters 82 in series allows for gas sampling after each canister 82. According to an exemplary embodiment, the sulfur detector is a resistor connected between voltage or current terminals. The resistor may comprise a metal strip or other conductor which has a reference resistance when new. The metal of the strip reacts in the presence of sulfur containing compounds, forming reaction bi-products such as metal sulfides, which have a higher electrical resistance. During operation of the assembly 80, a resistance measurement is made across the metal strip via a sensing circuit. When the resistance begins to shift to a higher value, the sensor is providing indication of the presence of sulfur. The detectors are placed down-stream of one or more channels 86. As the sensors indicate the presence of sulfur, the breakthrough of sulfur compounds can be inferred, allowing the operator of the fuel cell enclosure 10 to schedule a maintenance activity to exchange and rotate canisters 82.
All inputs and output (I/O) connections 88 for the canisters 82 are provided on the same side (e.g., the top side) of the desulfurizer assembly 80. The I/O connections 88 are swiveling leak-tight connections. Swiveling connections allows for the desulfurizer assembly 80 to continue operating as it rotates about the central axis 85. For example, as shown in
Each of the canisters 82 in series can absorb organosulfur compounds until the saturation level results in organosulfur compounds escaping the canister 82 without being absorbed. In normal operation of the desulfurizer assembly 80, the first three canisters 82 in series are allowed to break through. Once a sulfur sensor detects organosulfur compounds breaking through the third canister 82 in the series (e.g., DES 803), the first canister 82 in the series (e.g., DES 801) is bypassed and then removed. The canister DES 801 may be bypassed by closing connection 803s-803p and connecting connection 802s to connection 805p. This way, the fuel inlet stream travels from the inlet directly through connection 802s-805p into the second canister DES 802 bypassing canister DES 801. Canister DES 801 is then removed from the assembly 80 to be refilled with fresh desulfurizer material. The canisters 82 are rotated 90 degrees so that the canister 82/DES 802 that was originally second in the series is placed in the first position. Likewise, the canister 82/DES 802 formerly third in the series is moved into the second position and the canister 82/DES 804 formerly last in the series is moved to the third position. A new canister 82 is then placed in the fourth position. The new canister may be connected into the fourth position by having its inlet connected to connection 815p and its outlet connected to connection 815s while these two connections are bypassed. By doing this, each canister 82 is able to collect sulfur even after sulfur has broken through the third canister 82/DES 803.
Arranging the canisters 82 on a rotatable pad 84 avoids confusion by making rotation procedure a constant. The use of four canisters 82 allows connections between middle canisters 82 in the cascade series to remain undisturbed while a spent canister 82 is being removed and a new canister 82 installed. Because of the arrangement of the canisters 82 on the rotatable pad 84, all four canisters 82 can be brought in close proximity to the front of the module 14 cabinet (e.g., to within 14 inches to meet UL requirements in the United States). The I/O connections 88 allow the inlet and the outlet plumbing to stay in the same place while the canister 82 change their place in order.
While the desulfurizer assembly 80 described above includes loose desulphurization material in a generally rigid canisters 82, in another exemplary embodiment, desulfurization material may be pre-loaded into gas permeable bags. Then, the packaging of the desulfurization material into the desulfurization canister 82 is simplified via loading the bags into the canister structure—thereby eliminating the need to pour material into place. This further makes disassembly simpler because the bags may be quickly removed. Handles, ropes or other features might be attached to the bags to aid in removal of bags of spent material from the canisters 82. While a desulfurization assembly is described above, any other adsorption bed assembly other than a desulfurization assembly may include a rotatable support and a plurality of vessels arranged on the rotatable support, where each vessel contains an adsorption bed.
The construction and arrangements of the fuel cell system, as shown in the various exemplary embodiments, are illustrative only. Although only a few embodiments have been described in detail in this disclosure, many modifications are possible (e.g., variations in sizes, dimensions, structures, shapes and proportions of the various elements, values of parameters, mounting arrangements, use of materials, colors, orientations, etc.) without materially departing from the novel teachings and advantages of the subject matter described herein. Some elements shown as integrally formed may be constructed of multiple parts or elements, the position of elements may be reversed or otherwise varied, and the nature or number of discrete elements or positions may be altered or varied. The order or sequence of any process, logical algorithm, or method steps may be varied or re-sequenced according to alternative embodiments. Other substitutions, modifications, changes and omissions may also be made in the design, operating conditions and arrangement of the various exemplary embodiments without departing from the scope of the present disclosure. Any one or more features of any embodiment may be used in any combination with any one or more other features of one or more other embodiments.
This application is a continuation application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/242,194, entitled “Fuel Cell Mechanical Components” filed Sep. 23, 2011, which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/386,257, entitled “Fuel Cell Mechanical Components” filed on Sep. 24, 2010, the entire contents of both applications are hereby incorporated by reference to provide continuity of disclosure.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3453087 | Herp, Jr. et al. | Jul 1969 | A |
3453146 | Bawa et al. | Jul 1969 | A |
3488266 | French | Jan 1970 | A |
3527565 | Banchik et al. | Sep 1970 | A |
3531263 | Sederquist | Sep 1970 | A |
3607419 | Keating, Jr. | Sep 1971 | A |
3645701 | Banchik et al. | Feb 1972 | A |
3718506 | Fischer et al. | Feb 1973 | A |
3746658 | Porta et al. | Jul 1973 | A |
3972731 | Bloomfield et al. | Aug 1976 | A |
3973993 | Bloomfield et al. | Aug 1976 | A |
3976506 | Landau | Aug 1976 | A |
3982962 | Bloomfield | Sep 1976 | A |
3990912 | Katz | Nov 1976 | A |
4001041 | Menard | Jan 1977 | A |
4004947 | Bloomfield | Jan 1977 | A |
4041210 | Van Dine | Aug 1977 | A |
4052532 | Tannenberger | Oct 1977 | A |
4098722 | Cairns et al. | Jul 1978 | A |
4182795 | Baker et al. | Jan 1980 | A |
4190559 | Retallick | Feb 1980 | A |
4272353 | Lawrance et al. | Jun 1981 | A |
4315893 | McCallister | Feb 1982 | A |
4342816 | Kothmann et al. | Aug 1982 | A |
4365007 | Maru et al. | Dec 1982 | A |
4374184 | Somers et al. | Feb 1983 | A |
4402871 | Retallick | Sep 1983 | A |
4426269 | Brown et al. | Jan 1984 | A |
4430304 | Spurrier et al. | Feb 1984 | A |
4459340 | Mason | Jul 1984 | A |
4473517 | Goedtke et al. | Sep 1984 | A |
4473622 | Chludzinski et al. | Sep 1984 | A |
4522894 | Hwang et al. | Jun 1985 | A |
4532192 | Baker et al. | Jul 1985 | A |
4539267 | Sederquist | Sep 1985 | A |
4548875 | Lance et al. | Oct 1985 | A |
4554223 | Yokoyama et al. | Nov 1985 | A |
4567117 | Patel et al. | Jan 1986 | A |
4575407 | Diller | Mar 1986 | A |
4647516 | Matsumura et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
4654207 | Preston | Mar 1987 | A |
4657829 | McElroy et al. | Apr 1987 | A |
4670359 | Beshty et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
4678723 | Wertheim | Jul 1987 | A |
4686158 | Nishi et al. | Aug 1987 | A |
4696871 | Pinto | Sep 1987 | A |
4702973 | Marianowski | Oct 1987 | A |
4716023 | Christner et al. | Dec 1987 | A |
4722873 | Matsumura | Feb 1988 | A |
4728584 | Isenberg | Mar 1988 | A |
4737161 | Szydlowski et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
4792502 | Trocciola et al. | Dec 1988 | A |
4804592 | Vanderborgh et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4808491 | Reichner | Feb 1989 | A |
4810472 | Andrew et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
4812373 | Grimble et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
4820314 | Cohen et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4824740 | Abrams et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4828940 | Cohen et al. | May 1989 | A |
4847051 | Parenti, Jr. | Jul 1989 | A |
4847173 | Mitsunnaga et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4848034 | Pace | Jul 1989 | A |
4865926 | Levy et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4898792 | Singh et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
4904548 | Tajima | Feb 1990 | A |
4913982 | Kotchick et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
4917971 | Farooque | Apr 1990 | A |
4925745 | Remick et al. | May 1990 | A |
4933242 | Koga et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
4983471 | Reichner et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
4994331 | Cohen | Feb 1991 | A |
5009967 | Scheffler | Apr 1991 | A |
5034287 | Kunz | Jul 1991 | A |
5039579 | Kinoshita | Aug 1991 | A |
5047299 | Shockling | Sep 1991 | A |
5077148 | Schora et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5079105 | Bossel | Jan 1992 | A |
5082751 | Reichner | Jan 1992 | A |
5082752 | Koga et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
5084363 | Reiser | Jan 1992 | A |
5084632 | Shinbara | Jan 1992 | A |
5091075 | O'Neill et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
5100743 | Narita et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5143800 | George et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5162167 | Minh et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5169730 | Reichner et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5170124 | Blair et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5171645 | Khandkar | Dec 1992 | A |
5175062 | Farooque et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5187024 | Matsumura | Feb 1993 | A |
5192334 | Rohr et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5212022 | Takahashi et al. | May 1993 | A |
5213910 | Yamada | May 1993 | A |
5215946 | Minh | Jun 1993 | A |
5227256 | Marianowski et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5232792 | Reznikov | Aug 1993 | A |
5246791 | Fisher et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5256499 | Minh et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5270127 | Koga et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5273837 | Aiken et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5290323 | Okuyama et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5290642 | Minh et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5302470 | Okada et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5324452 | Allam et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5328779 | Tannenberger et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5340664 | Hartvigsen | Aug 1994 | A |
5342705 | Minh et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5344721 | Sonai et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5346779 | Nakazawa | Sep 1994 | A |
5348814 | Niikura et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5360679 | Buswell et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5366819 | Hartvigsen et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5368667 | Minh et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5441821 | Merritt et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5453146 | Kemper | Sep 1995 | A |
5470360 | Sederquist | Nov 1995 | A |
5498487 | Ruka et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5501914 | Satake et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5505824 | McElroy | Apr 1996 | A |
5516344 | Corrigan | May 1996 | A |
5518829 | Satake et al. | May 1996 | A |
5527631 | Singh et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5532072 | Spaeh et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5573867 | Zafred et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5589017 | Minh | Dec 1996 | A |
5589285 | Cable et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5601937 | Isenberg | Feb 1997 | A |
5641585 | Lessing et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5686196 | Singh et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5688609 | Rostrup-Nielsen et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5688610 | Spaeh et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5693201 | Hsu et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5730213 | Kiser et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5733675 | Dederer et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5741406 | Barnett | Apr 1998 | A |
5741605 | Gillett et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5763114 | Khandkar et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5773160 | Wilkinson et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5914200 | Schabert et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5922488 | Marucchi-Soos et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5955039 | Dowdy | Sep 1999 | A |
5993989 | Baozhen | Nov 1999 | A |
6013385 | DuBose | Jan 2000 | A |
6051125 | Pham et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6080500 | Fuju et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6106964 | Voss et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6106967 | Virkar et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6228521 | Kim et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6238816 | Cable et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6280865 | Eisman et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6287716 | Hashimoto et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6329090 | McElroy et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6348278 | LaPierre et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6361892 | Ruhl et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6376111 | Mathias et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6383670 | Edlund et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6403245 | Hunt | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6436562 | DuBose et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6451466 | Grasso et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6464586 | Kamata et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6489050 | Ruhl et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6495279 | Bogicevic et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6531243 | Thom | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6558831 | Doshi et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6582842 | King | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6582845 | Helfinstine et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6592965 | Gordon | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6605316 | Visco | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6623880 | Geisbrecht et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6656625 | Thompson et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6677070 | Kearl | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6682842 | Visco et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6691702 | Appel et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6749958 | Pastula et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6767662 | Jacobson | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6787261 | Ukai | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6797425 | Blanchet | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6803141 | Pham | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6811913 | Ruhl | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6821663 | McElroy et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6854688 | McElroy et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6924053 | McElroy | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6972161 | Beatty et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6979511 | Visco | Dec 2005 | B2 |
7008465 | Graham et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7067208 | Gottmann et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7150927 | Hickey et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7157173 | Kwon | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7255956 | McElroy | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7494732 | Roy | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7546938 | Panasik et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7550217 | Kwon | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7563503 | Gell | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7601183 | Larsen | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7601459 | An et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7713649 | Hickey et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
8440362 | Richards et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
20010049035 | Haltiner, Jr. et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020006535 | Woods et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020012825 | Sasahara et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020014417 | Kuehnle et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020028362 | Prediger et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020028367 | Sammes et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020058175 | Ruhl | May 2002 | A1 |
20020098406 | Huang et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020106544 | Noetzel et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020127455 | Pham et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020132156 | Ruhl et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020142208 | Keefer et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020192516 | Tajima | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030031904 | Haltiner | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030049502 | Dickman et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030157386 | Gottmann | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030162067 | McElroy | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030165732 | McElroy | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030196893 | McElroy | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030205641 | McElroy | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030235725 | Haltiner et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040081859 | McElroy et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040089438 | Valensa et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040131912 | Keefer et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040180253 | Fisher | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040191595 | McElroy et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040191597 | McElroy | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040191598 | Gottmann et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040202914 | Sridhar et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040217732 | Zhu et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040224193 | Mitlitsky et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050026011 | Suzuki et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050048334 | Sridhar et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050048336 | Takebe et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050048338 | Kobayashi et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050056412 | Reinke et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050074650 | Sridhar et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050164051 | Venkataraman et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050170235 | Hu et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050227134 | Nguyen | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050249988 | Pearson | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050271919 | Hata et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060008682 | McLean et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060040168 | Sridhar | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060147771 | Russell et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060166070 | Hickey et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060188763 | Bai et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060210841 | Wallace et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060216575 | Cassidy | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060222929 | Hickey et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060248799 | Bandhauer et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060251934 | Valensa et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060251939 | Bandhauer et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060251940 | Bandhauer et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070017368 | Levan et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070017369 | Levan et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070045125 | Hartvigsen et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070082254 | Hiwatashi | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070141423 | Suzuki | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070141443 | Brown | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070141444 | Brown | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070224481 | Suzuki et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070237999 | Donahue | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070243435 | Dutta | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070259242 | Schaevitz et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070275292 | Sin Xicola et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070287048 | Couse et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080010959 | Gillingham et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080029388 | Elangovan | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080038600 | Valensa et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080075984 | Badding | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080076006 | Gottmann et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080096080 | Batawi | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080102337 | Shimada | May 2008 | A1 |
20080254336 | Batawi | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080261099 | Nguyen | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090029195 | Gauckler | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090029208 | Katikaneni et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090053569 | Perry et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090068533 | Fukasawa et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090130530 | Tanaka | May 2009 | A1 |
20090186250 | Narendar et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090214919 | Suzuki | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090246566 | Craft et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090291347 | Suzuki | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100018396 | Ding et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100035109 | Weingaertner et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20110281185 | Sridhar | Nov 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
101147285 | Mar 2008 | CN |
101295792 | Oct 2008 | CN |
19822697 | Oct 1998 | DE |
0398111 | Nov 1990 | EP |
0977294 | Feb 2000 | EP |
1501146 | Jan 2005 | EP |
1048839 | Nov 1966 | GB |
60235365 | Nov 1985 | JP |
3196465 | Aug 1991 | JP |
05-047408 | Feb 1993 | JP |
6215778 | Aug 1994 | JP |
2000-281438 | Oct 2000 | JP |
2005-044727 | Feb 2005 | JP |
20020092223 | Dec 2002 | KR |
20070095440 | Sep 2007 | KR |
20080010737 | Jan 2008 | KR |
20080097971 | Nov 2008 | KR |
100886239 | Feb 2009 | KR |
20090061870 | Jun 2009 | KR |
WO9418712 | Aug 1994 | WO |
WO2004013258 | Feb 2004 | WO |
WO2004092756 | Oct 2004 | WO |
WO2004093214 | Oct 2004 | WO |
WO2005041329 | May 2005 | WO |
WO2008019926 | Feb 2008 | WO |
WO2009097110 | Aug 2009 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Ahmad-Khantou et al., “Electrochemical & Microstructural Study of SOFC Cathodes Based on La0.5Sr0.3MnO3 and Pr0.65Sr0.3MnO3,” Electrochemical Society Proceedings, 2001, p. 476-485, vol. 2001-2016. |
Mori et al., “Lanthanum Alkaline-Earth Manganites as a Cathode Material in High-Temperature Solid Oxide Fuel Cells,” Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 1999, p. 4041-4047, vol. 146. |
L.G. Austin, “Cell & Stack Construction: Low Temperature Cells,” Fuel Cells: A Review of Government-Sponsored Research, 1950-1964, NASA SP-120, 1967. |
EG & G Services, Parsons, Inc., SAIC, Fuel Cell Handbook, 5th Edition, USDOE, Oct. 2000, p. 9-1-9.4, and 9-12-9-14. |
J.M. Sedlak, et al., “Hydrogen Recovery and Purification Using the Solid Polymer Electrolyte Electrolysis Cell,” Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, vol. 6, p. 45-51, 1981. |
Dr. Ruhl, “Low Cost Reversible Fuel Cell System,” Proceedings of the 2000 U.S. DOE Hydrogen Program Review, Jun. 15, 2000, NREL/CP-570-30535. |
“Low Cost, Compact Solid Oxide Fuel Cell Generator,” Technology Management Inc., (no date available), 1pg. |
Low Cost, High Efficiency Reversible Fuel Cell (and Electrolyzer) Systems, Proceedings of the 2001 DOE Hydrogen Program Review NREL/CP-570-30535. |
Milliken et al., “Low Cost, High Efficiency Reversible Fuel Cell Systems,” Proceedings of the 2002 U.S. DOE Hydrogen Program Review, NREL/CP-610-32405. |
K. Eguchi et al., Power Generation and Steam Electrolysis Characteristics of an Electrochemical Cell with a Zirconia or Ceria based Electrode, Solid State Ionics, 86 88, 1996, p. 1245-1249. |
F. Mitlitsky et al., “Regenerative Fuel Cells for High Altitude Long Endurance Solar Powered Aircraft,” 28th Intersociety Energy Conversion Engineering Conference (IECED), Jul. 28, 1993, UCRL-JC-113485. |
Small, Ultra Efficient Fuel Cell Systems, Advanced Technology Program, ATP 2001 Competition, Jun. 2002. |
F. Mitlitsky et al., Unitized Regenerative Fuel Cells for Solar Rechargeable Aircraft and Zero Emission Vehicles, 1994 Fuel Cell Seminar, Sep. 6, 1994, UCRL-JC-117130. |
Ralph et al., “Cathode Materials for Reduced-Temperature SOFCs,” Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 2003, p. A1518-A1522, vol. 150. |
Simmer et al., “Development of Fabrication Techniques and Electrodes for Solid Oxide Fuel Cells,” Electrochemcial Society Proceedings, p. 1050-1061, vol. 2001-16. |
Yamamoto et al., “Electrical Conductivity of Stabilized Zirconia with Ytterbia and Scandia,” Solid State Ionics, v79, p. 137-142, Jul. 1995. |
Araki et al., “Degradation Mechanism of Scandia-Stabilized Zirconia Electrolytes: Discussion based on Annealing Effects on Mechanical Strength, Ionic Conductivity, and Raman Spectrum,” Solid State Ionics, v180, n28-31, p. 1484-1489, Nov. 2009. |
Lybye et al., “Effect of Transition Metal Ions on the Conductivity and Stability of Stabilized Zirconia,” Ceramic Engineering and Science Proceedings, v27, n4, p. 67-78, 2006. |
Anonymous, “Presentation of the LabView-based Software Used in Fuel Cell Technologies Testing System,” http://web.archive.org/web/20040715025135/fuelcelltechnologies.com/Support/Downloads/Tutorial.pdf, Jul. 15, 2004. |
Hamburger et al., “LabView DSC Automates Fuel Cell Catalyst Research,” Nov. 4, 2004, http://web.archive.org/web/20041104200039/http://bloomy.com/newsletters/fuelcellresearch.pdf. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130280635 A1 | Oct 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61386257 | Sep 2010 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13242194 | Sep 2011 | US |
Child | 13845685 | US |