The present invention relates to a method of determining energy consumption, and more particularly to a method of determining energy consumption of bus heating, ventilating, and air conditioning (HVAC) units.
Conventional methods of testing HVAC equipment are suitable for certain types of equipment in certain environments. For example, ANSI/ASHRAE Standard 37-2009, “Methods of Testing for Rating Electrically Driven Unitary Air-Conditioning and Heat Pump Equipment,” applies to electrically driven mechanical-compression unitary air conditioners and heat pumps that consist of one or more assemblies having an indoor air coil, a compressor, and an outdoor coil. Evaluating the cooling capacity performance of HVAC equipment is accomplished through, for example, measuring the air flow and air enthalpy difference across the evaporator, or measuring the refrigerant mass flow and refrigerant enthalpy difference through the evaporator. For bus and/or rail HVAC unit testing, such measurements of cooling capacity commonly occur at maximum compressor speeds.
A more effective way to calculate the energy consumption of a bus HVAC unit is to measure the bus engine increase in fuel consumption during the operation period of the HVAC unit. But measuring cooling capacity at maximum compressor speed, and with the evaporator and condenser fans in high speed mode due to maximum cooling capacity requirements, is not always a sufficient basis for calculating the bus engine fuel consumption because most air-conditioned buses equipped with HVAC units power the HVAC unit through the bus engine. Specifically, the HVAC compressor is either driven directly from the engine using a belt, or with electric or hydraulic power transmission. The bus HVAC unit compressor speed consequently varies depending on the bus operating conditions. Properly comparing the efficiency of various bus HVAC units requires measuring the HVAC unit fuel consumption dependent on bus engine speed and therefore should be determined using a road profile based on established variations of bus engine speed with time. Because the bus engine-powered HVAC unit has no direct fuel consumption, its energy consumption can be determined by first evaluating the HVAC unit power input measured under specific conditions and then recalculating these results in terms of a bus engine fuel consumption increment when the HVAC unit is in operation. Such a method can be used as a comparative energy consumption test procedure under realistic bus HVAC unit operating conditions that avoid deficiencies of calculations based on standard cooling capacity tests centered on nominal performance.
In one embodiment, a method for determining the energy consumption of a bus heating, ventilating, and air conditioning (HVAC) unit uses a testing system having a volume simulating a bus internal volume. The HVAC unit includes a refrigerant compressor and a fan for moving air. The refrigerant compressor is configured to operate at one or more rotational speeds, with the one or more rotational speeds corresponding to a multiple of one or more tested bus engine speeds. The testing system is operable to apply one or more testing heat loads to the simulated bus internal volume. The method includes operating the HVAC unit for a test period and measuring power consumed by the compressor at at least one of a first testing heat load and a second testing heat load at one or more rotational speeds. The method further includes measuring power consumed by the fan at the at least one of a first testing heat load and the second testing heat load at each of the one or more rotational speeds, determining an association between (a) each of the measured power consumed by the compressor and the measured power consumed by the fan at the at least one of a first testing heat load and a second testing heat load and (b) one or more tested bus engine speeds, and calculating power consumed by the compressor and power consumed by the fan at the at least one of a first testing heat load and a second testing heat load at a plurality of profiled bus engine speeds based on the association, wherein the plurality of profiled bus engine speeds is derived from a bus road profile of known bus engine speeds at known time durations, with the known time durations summing to a time period. The method also includes calculating energy consumed as energy consumed by the compressor and energy consumed by the fan at the at least one of a first testing heat load and a second testing heat load over the time period.
In another embodiment, a method for determining the energy consumption of a bus heating, ventilating, and air conditioning (HVAC) unit uses a testing system having a volume simulating a bus internal volume. The HVAC unit includes a refrigerant compressor and a fan for moving air. The refrigerant compressor is configured to operate at one or more rotational speeds, with the one or more rotational speeds corresponding to a multiple of one or more tested bus engine speeds. The testing system is operable to apply one or more testing heat loads to the simulated bus internal volume during a test period. The HVAC unit includes an automatic temperature control mode in which the refrigerant compressor is on for a portion of the test period and off for a portion of the test period. The method includes operating the HVAC unit for the test period in the automatic temperature control mode and measuring power consumed by the compressor at one or more testing heat loads at one or more rotational speeds. The method further includes determining an association between the measured power consumed by the compressor at the one or more testing heat loads and one or more tested bus engine speeds and calculating power consumed by the compressor at the one or more testing heat loads at a plurality of profiled bus engine speeds based on the association, wherein the plurality of profiled bus engine speeds is derived from a bus road profile of known bus engine speeds at known time durations, with the known time durations summing to a time period. The method also includes calculating energy consumed by the compressor at the one or more testing heat loads over the time period.
Other aspects of the invention will become apparent by consideration of the detailed description and accompanying drawings.
a is a chart of the compressor mean power consumption vs. heat load for the compressor of the system illustrated in
b is a chart of the fan power consumption vs. heat load for the evaporator and condenser fans of the system illustrated in
a is a chart of the compressor mean power consumption vs. bus engine speed for the compressor of the system illustrated in
b is a chart of the fan power consumption vs. bus engine speed for the evaporator and condenser fans of the system illustrated in
a is a chart of compressor power consumption for the road profile of
b is a chart of fan power consumption for the road profile of
Before any embodiments of the invention are explained in detail, it is to be understood that the invention is not limited in its application to the details of construction and the arrangement of components or steps set forth in the following description or illustrated in the following drawings. The invention is capable of other embodiments and of being practiced or of being carried out in various ways.
To properly test the bus HVAC unit, the testing line 112 within the test room 110 must accurately simulate the internal volume of the bus to be modeled. An appropriately sized testing line and system can be constructed for this specific purpose, or, alternatively, a standard testing system for HVAC unit air-flow and cooling capacity testing can be modified as necessary. As an example of the latter, a new air-duct line (testing line) specifically sized for bus HVAC unit testing could be placed in parallel with an existing air-duct line used for standard cooling capacity testing, such as that used with ANSI/ASHRAE Standard 37-2009 testing described above. With properly positioned dampers, such as dampers 113a and 113b in
The tested unit 104 is connected with the testing line 112 in the test room 110. A testing heat load % is generated in testing line 112 in order to represent realistic heat loads for the tested unit as would be experienced in a bus on the road. The testing heat load
% is defined as a percentage of the rated nominal cooling capacity
O at the maximum compressor speed of the HVAC unit 104.
The testing heat load % consists of two parts, a latent heat load
L and a sensible heat load
S, represented as:
%=
L+
S. (1)
The latent heat load L represents the energy required to dehumidify the air, i.e., absorb the heat of vaporization of the moisture in the air. Within a bus, this is related to the humidity produced by passengers in the bus. Within the testing line 112, latent heat is simulated by a latent heat source 114, such as evaporating water, in a mixing room 120. The latent heat load
L, which represents a presumed number of passengers in the bus, can be defined as 10% of the rated nominal cooling capacity
O. This definition is based on an assumption that the size of the tested HVAC unit 104 is directly proportional to the expected number of passengers, though other assumptions could of course be utilized.
The sensible heat load s represents the energy required to lower the temperature of the air and corresponds to heat gain from passengers, heat gain due to heat transfer through the bus walls, and heat gain from solar radiation. Heat related to any fresh air load, for example through door infiltration when the bus door is opened, is not simulated in the present embodiment. The sensible heat load source 116, which consists of heating bars or other like source, is installed in the testing line 112 and the heat provided is controlled by regulating the power input to the sensible heat load source, PS. Specifically, the power input PS to the sensible heat load source is controlled in dependence on the required testing heat load
%, latent heat load
L, duct testing line heat gain
G, and the duct line fan input power PL, as described below:
PS=%−
L−
G−PL (2)
The requested sensible heat load S is generally maintained at a constant level independent of any system changes caused by the control strategy, to be described below. The duct line fan input power PL is continuously monitored as a function of the variable supply frequency of the duct line fan 124. The testing line heat gains
G can be calculated from measured inside temperatures TI and outside temperatures TO of the testing line 112, the heat transfer surface SL of the testing line 112, and the known heat transfer coefficient kL of the testing line 112:
G=kL×SL×(TO−TI) (3)
During testing, the tested unit 104 operates in an automatic mode based on a requested setpoint TS. HVAC unit power consumption PU is preferably measured at three testing heat load levels, though more than three heat levels are certainly contemplated with the described embodiment. These levels are defined as a percentage of the rated nominal cooling capacity O, for example,
30%,
40%, and
M% representing 30%, 40%, and a maximal heat load. The maximal heat load,
M%, is estimated in advance of testing through cooling capacity measurements at a specific ambient temperature TA within the hot room 108, for example TA=35° C., and a specific setpoint temperature TS, for example TS=27° C. A relative humidity of 50% is used to establish
M% at an idle bus engine speed of 500 RPM. In the described embodiment, the maximal heat load
M% could, for example, correspond to 50% of the rated nominal cooling capacity
O, or
50%. The maximal heat load
M%, can, however, be any percentage up to and including the rated nominal cooling capacity
O, i.e.,
0% to
100%. The HVAC unit power consumption PU can therefore be calculated, as will be further detailed, as a function of the testing heat load level
%.
The compressor of the tested unit 104 is installed on a compressor test stand and operates at a requested constant rotational speed nC (further detailed below). The rotation speed n and torque τ of the compressor are measured using equipment suitable for the purpose, such as an optical speed sensor and torque transducer. Because the compressor speed of the bus HVAC unit is directly related to the engine speed of the bus, as earlier described, a relationship must be established between realistic bus engine speeds and the consequent speed of the compressor to accurately establish the requested constant speed nC. To do that in the presently described embodiment, four engine testing speeds nB are used as a basis, 500 RPM, 1000 RPM, 1500 RPM, and 1900 RPM, though fewer than four, more than four, or differently valued engine speeds are certainly possible. A speed ratio between the bus engine and the unit HVAC compressor is obtained according to actual operational parameters of the bus. As an example, if the speed ratio λ between the bus engine speeds provided and the HVAC compressor speed is 1.3, the testing compressor rotational speed nC is adjusted based on this multiple of the four engine testing speeds of 500, 1000, 1500, and 1900 RPM to 650, 1300, 1950, and 2470 RPM, respectively.
For testing, the ambient temperature TA in the hot room 108 is kept at approximately TA=35° C., while the specific setpoint temperature TS of the HVAC unit 104 is adjusted to TS=27° C. The relative humidity is influenced by the latent heat L and varies with the status of the compressor during testing (ON or OFF). The presently described embodiment, however, is not limited to any particular values of TA, TS, or relative humidity during testing.
The tested unit 104 operates in automatic temperature control mode for one hour after reaching the setpoint temperature TS for each of the tested conditions. In this mode, the compressor automatically switches ON and OFF, with the evaporator and condenser fan(s) (not shown in
TP=TON+TOFF (4)
The total unit operation time TT during the test is calculated from the number of measured periods (for example, five (5) in
TT=TP×(number of measured periods) (5)
A time ratio TR between the overall compressor ON time TON and the total unit operation time TT is calculated as in equation (6):
TR=ΣTON/TT (6)
The instant compressor input power (power consumption) PC is calculated from the measured rotation speed n of the compressor and the compressor torque τ as:
PC=2×π×(n/60)×τ (7)
The mean compressor input power
Evaporator fan and condenser fan input power, PF, is calculated from the measured supply voltage V and the measured current I across the evaporator fans and condenser fans, as in equation (9):
PF=V×I (9)
From the calculated test output data the compressor mean power consumption %, (i.e.,
30%,
40%, etc.), is calculated for each bus engine speed nB.
% and four bus engine speeds nB.
These results can be manipulated to obtain analytic functions of compressor mean power consumption %.
Once established, these functions are utilizable for calculations of compressor and fan power consumption at particular bus speeds defined by a particular bus road profile. Bus engine speeds during operation can be obtained through publicly accessible real bus road profiles that are based upon actual measured data of variations of bus engine speed in time during a bus operating cycle. Multiple cycles together will constitute a usable bus road profile. Sources of bus operating cycle data are readily available, for example, the International Association of Public Transport produces, through Project SORT (Standardised On-Road Tests cycles), reproducible test cycles for on-road tests of buses in order to measure their fuel consumption. Other established cycles can be used to obtain a standard road profile definition, the degree of specificity of which can vary depending on the testing objectives. Referring to the table of
The test data of compressor mean power consumption %. The tables of
% tested. Based on the relationship between energy, power, and time, the compressor power consumption PCR and fan power consumption PFR at the road profile can also be recalculated to compressor energy consumption ECR and fan energy consumption EFR over the course of the road profile, which in the presently described embodiment is approximately 0.8 hour (2830 s/3600 s from
%. In the illustrated embodiment, a one-hour unit of time is used. The total unit of time HVAC unit energy consumption ER is obtained as the summation of the two. An example of the above energy consumptions over the course of the road profile and extrapolated to one hour vs. the corresponding heat load is shown in
The data are recalculated to a unit of time HVAC unit diesel fuel consumption CR1 at the prescribed road profile using the total unit of time HVAC unit energy consumption ER1, a standard specific fuel consumption of a standard diesel engine cs and a standard diesel fuel density. For common diesel engines, a standard specific fuel consumption cs is typically about 165 g/(kW-h), and a standard diesel fuel density is 836 g/l. The calculation is set forth in equation (10):
CR1=(ER1×cs)/(836 g/l) (10)
The unit of time HVAC unit diesel consumption CR1 at the prescribed road profile can also be used to express a fuel consumption CR per HVAC unit lifetime over the same road profile by defining a bus lifetime tB and average operation hours of the HVAC unit per year h, as in equation (11):
CR=CR1×tB×h (11)
The table of % as illustrated in equation (12):
cR=CR1/% (12)
The final results of the fuel consumption test for an adequate comparison of bus HVAC units are defined by two parameters. The first parameter is the unit of time specific fuel consumption at the particular road profile cR, as described above. As an example, various bus HVAC units could be compared based on their specific unit of time fuel consumption at a heat load of 40%. The second parameter is the maximal allowed heat load
A. The maximal allowed heat load
A is defined as a percentage of the rated nominal cooling capacity
O and it represents a limiting heat load with which the HVAC unit is able to maintain the requested temperature setpoint TS at given conditions through the entire range of the particular road profile. In other words, if the HVAC unit is operating with a mean compressor speed corresponding to a mean bus engine speed at the road profile, a maximal heat load exists at which the setpoint TS can be maintained. The mean bus engine speed
For the particular road profile used in the presently described embodiment,
If the testing heat load % were to be a greater value than maximal allowed heat load
A at
A because the internal bus temperature TB is increasing above the allowed temperature setpoint offset.
The described method is applicable not only to bus HVAC units in which the compressor is driven directly from the bus engine, but to HVAC units driven from an engine alternator, a battery, or the like.
Various features and advantages of the invention are set forth in the following claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5816491 | Berkeley et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
6089034 | Lake et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6755032 | Kotwicki et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
7007491 | Grimm et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7276815 | Algrain et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7779616 | Sheidler et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7845187 | Patel et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7861547 | Major et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
20040221594 | Suzuki et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20060080976 | Markowitz et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20070186573 | Ziehr et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20090007856 | Minekawa | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090229288 | Alston et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20100011789 | Carlson et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100082499 | Luff | Apr 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
10052898 | Jul 2001 | DE |
0933606 | Aug 1999 | EP |
2010145309 | Jul 2010 | JP |
378736 | Apr 2007 | PL |
380881 | Apr 2008 | PL |
2010048036 | Apr 2010 | WO |
2010114460 | Oct 2010 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Translation of PL380881, R. Arkadiusz, Method for the Measurement of Fuel Consumption Recording Apparatus, Apr. 4, 2008. |
Translation of PL378736, Method for the Measurement of the Fuel Consumption in the Internal Combustion Engine Coupled with a Power Generator and a System for the Measuring Fuel Consumption in the Internal Combustion Engine Coupled With a Power Generator, K. Leszek, Apr. 16, 2007. |
“Directive 2009/33/EC 2009 of The European Parliament and of The Council of Apr. 23, 2009 on the Promotion of Clean and Energy-Efficient Road Transport Vehicles,” Official Journal of the European Union, May 15, 2009, 8 pages. |
Pitchaikani Anand, Jebakumar Kingsly, Venkataraman Shankar, Sundaresan S.A., “Real-time Drive Cycle Simulation of Automotive Climate Control System,” Proceedings 7th Modelica Conference, Como, Italy, Sep. 20-22, 2009, 8 pages. |
Ryska A., Kral F., Ota J, “Method of Determination of the Effective Capacity of Refrigeration and A/C Units of Variable Speeds,” International Journal of Refrigeration, 2000, pp. 402-405, vol. 23. |
“UITP Project ‘SORT’ Standardised On-Road Tests Cycles,” brochure, 2009, 36 pages, International Association of Public Transport, Brussels, Belgium. |
“Fuel Consumption Measurement Method for Vehicle Powered Refrigeration Units Based on a Concept of Standard Vehicle Engine,” WP.11/2007/63rd/INF.3, description of the test, Nov. 12-15, 2007, 8 pages, United Nations Economic Commission for Europe, Inland Transport Committee, Geneva, Switzerland. |
“ANSI/ASHRAE Standard 37-2009, Methods of Testing for Rating Electrically Driven Unitary Air-Conditioning and Heat Pump Equipment,” Sep. 2009, 34 pages, American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers, Inc., Atlanta, Georgia. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120265460 A1 | Oct 2012 | US |