The present invention refers to the field of gas turbines. It relates to a fuel distribution system for a gas turbine with multistage burner arrangement.
In gas turbines with a plurality of burner stages which are in operation at the same time, it is known to realize feed of the burner stages with fuel via two or more regulated control valves and ring mains in each case, depending upon the number of “burner stagings” (see, for example, WO-A1-2005/093327). Such an arrangement is exemplarily reproduced in a much simplified form in
Depending upon the operating point, the required fuel mass flow for the respective burner stage 11, 12 is adjusted via the control valves 22, 23, 24. In this case, a fuel feed stage at low load and when starting the gas turbine is normally designed so that fuel-rich zones are locally established in the burner flow field and ensure a broad operating field of the burner. In the higher load range, this fuel feed is noticeably reduced in order to realize low emissions values (see: EP-B1-0 704 657 and WO-A1-01/96785).
The fuel feed which is established for the lower load range in this case is to preferably have higher pressure loss with regard to the fuel feed so that in full load operation with low throughputs a sufficient fuel distribution across the burners can be ensured. On the other hand, during ignition and when starting the gas turbine a sufficiently smaller fuel mass flow has to be established in order to avoid over-firing of the turbine. Since a multiplicity of control valves have to be adjusted and regulated at the same time, instabilities in the controlling behavior of the fuel feed may occur, which can lead to increased pollutant emission and pulsations in the combustion chamber.
The present disclosure is directed to a fuel distribution system for a gas turbine with multistage burner arrangement. The system includes at least one distribution line that branches off from a common fuel feed line and is led to a burner stage. At least one element for the specific influencing of the fuel mass flow is provided in the at least one distribution line and a control valve is arranged in a section of the at least one distribution line as an element for the specific influencing of the fuel mass flow. A restrictor, which is preset in a fixed manner, is arranged in the remaining distribution lines as an element for the specific influencing of the fuel mass flow.
The invention is subsequently to be explained in more detail based on exemplary embodiments in conjunction with the drawing. In the drawing
A fuel distribution system for gas turbines is provided, which avoids the disadvantages of known fuel distribution systems and is especially characterized by the possibility for a simplified controlling method and a low-emissions and pulsation-free operation.
It is a feature of the invention that a control valve is arranged in each case in one section of the distribution lines as an element for the specific influencing of the fuel mass flow, and that a restrictor, which is preset in a fixed manner, is arranged in each case in the remaining distribution lines as an element for the specific influencing of the fuel mass flow.
One development of the invention is that a control valve is arranged only in one of the distribution lines, and the single control valve is arranged in the distribution line which leads to the first burner stage. As a result of this, especially simple controlling can be achieved.
According to another development of the invention, the restrictors in the distribution lines are selected so that the respective fuel portions of the individual burner stages are adjusted to a fuel ratio which is favorable for the load range of the gas turbine. The control valve, or the control valves, is or are preferably controlled by a control unit.
A further development of the invention is that the burners of the individual burner stages are connected in each case to a common fuel ring main, and in that the fuel ring mains are connected in each case via one of the distribution lines to the common fuel feed line.
In
Contrary to the conventional solution, only the fuel mass flow for the primary burner stage 11 has to be regulated in this case, while the mass flows of the other burner stage(s) 12 are created via the initial pressure and the pressure loss across the restrictors 26, 27 in the secondary stages. A significantly simplified operating concept of the system results from this. The respective fuel portions of the individual stages, with correctly dimensioned restrictors 26, 27, should adjust to a fuel ratio which is favorable for the load range. In this case, however, the burner must be designed with regard to fuel stagings.
As a result of the saving of one control valve, possible instabilities in the controlling behavior of the fuel feed are reduced since in this case only the main valve 22 has to be controlled and the other mass flows are automatically adjusted based on the flow resistance which is created by the restrictor(s) 26, 27.
This also brings certain advantages in the case of a sudden load shedding of the gas turbine. Thus, the fuel mass flow can be reduced significantly quicker in a controlled manner in this case without possible control valve fluctuations and fuel stagings for the individual operating points having to be reacted to in the process since these are automatically adjusted.
With the system described above, the following typical characteristics and advantages can be combined:
Simplified controlling behavior and fuel supply system for a gas turbine in oil and gas operation.
Use of gas turbine burners with more than one fuel stage in operation at the same time.
Low-emissions and pulsation-free operation when combusting liquid and gaseous fuels in a gas turbine combustion chamber.
Use of wet and dry oil combustion.
Control of CO emissions and NOx emissions within the entire load range.
Use of annular combustion chambers, pot-type combustion chambers, silo combustion chambers and tubular combustion chambers with single or multiple burner arrangements.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1918/07 | Dec 2007 | CH | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2944388 | Bayer | Jul 1960 | A |
2963862 | Jay | Dec 1960 | A |
3397536 | Davies et al. | Aug 1968 | A |
4920740 | Shekleton | May 1990 | A |
4932861 | Keller et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
5311742 | Izumi et al. | May 1994 | A |
5588826 | Dobbeling et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
6293105 | Claesson et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6405524 | Mistry et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6857272 | Summerfield et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
7269939 | Kothnur et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7610745 | Fujii et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7780437 | Bernero et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
20080271456 | Scully et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0321809 | Jun 1989 | EP |
1067338 | Jan 2001 | EP |
0704657 | Nov 2001 | EP |
0969192 | Dec 2008 | EP |
1645802 | Apr 2012 | EP |
2174147 | Oct 1986 | GB |
0196785 | Dec 2001 | WO |
2005010437 | Feb 2005 | WO |
2005093327 | Oct 2005 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090145131 A1 | Jun 2009 | US |