This application claims priority to German Patent Application DE10348604.6 filed Oct. 20, 2003, the entirety of which is incorporated by reference herein.
This invention relates to a fuel injection nozzle. More particularly, this invention relates to a fuel injection nozzle for a gas turbine combustion chamber with a film applicator provided with several fuel openings.
A great variety of methods is used to prepare the fuel-air mixture in gas turbine combustion chambers, with distinction being basically made between their application to stationary gas turbines or aircraft gas turbines and the respective specific requirements. However, in order to reduce pollutant emissions, in particular nitrogen oxide emissions, the fuel must generally be premixed with as much air as possible to obtain a lean combustion state, i.e. one characterized by air excess. Such a mixture is, however, problematic since it may affect stabilizing mechanisms in the combustion process.
Combustion is almost exclusively stabilized by the effect of swirling air, enabling the partly burnt gases to be re-circulated. Fuel is frequently introduced centrally by means of a nozzle arranged on the center axis of the atomizer. Here, fuel is in many cases injected into the airflow with considerable overpressure to achieve adequate penetration and to premix it with as much air as possible. These pressure atomizers are intended to break up the fuel directly. However, some designs of injection nozzles are intended to spray the fuel as completely as possible onto an atomizer lip. The fuel is accelerated on the atomizer lip by the airflow, broken up into fine droplets at the downstream end of this lip and mixed with air. Another possibility to apply the fuel onto this atomizer lip is by way of a so-called film applicator, in which case the fuel is distributed as uniformly as possible in the form of a film.
A further possibility to mix the fuel as intensely as possible with a great quantity of air is by decentral injection (
Both, the injection of fuel by means of a central nozzle or a pressure atomizer and the introduction as a film by way of a film applicator are to be optimized such that a maximum amount of the air passing the atomizer, if possible the entire air, is homogeneously mixed with fuel prior to combustion. Characteristic of a low-pollutant, in particular low-nitrogen oxide combustion is the preparation of a lean fuel-air mixture, i.e. one premixed with air excess. However, this entails fuel nozzles whose flow areas are large enough to enable the high quantity of air to be premixed with fuel. Due to the size of these fuel nozzles and, if central injection is used, the limited ability of the fuel jets or sprays to penetrate the constantly increasing sizes of air passages and, thus, to provide a homogenous distribution of the fuel-air mixture, novel concepts of fuel injection and pre-mixture are required.
Homogenous distribution and introduction of fuel in large airflow passages calls for decentral injection from a maximum number of fuel openings to be arranged on the airflow passage walls. Due to their great number, however, the openings will be very small, as a result of which they may be blocked or clogged by contaminated fuel. Since these burners are frequently cut in at higher engine loads, blockage may also be caused by fuel degradation products if, after intermediate or high-load operation, burner operation via these fuel openings is deactivated and the fuel remaining in the fuel nozzle is heated up and degraded.
Typical of the fuel nozzles is, in many cases, a very irregular velocity and mass flow distribution in the radial direction. Due to the swirling air, which is required to stabilize the subsequent combustion process, the local airflows are at maximum in the area of the radially outer limiting wall. If fuel is introduced into the airflow via a small number of openings, the circumferential homogeneity of the fuel in the air will, on the one hand, be affected and, on the other hand, the fuel can penetrate very deeply into the flow and unintentionally mix and vaporize in regions in which air is not sufficiently available. This may also occur with decentral injection.
The present invention, in a broad aspect, provides a fuel injection nozzle of the type specified at the beginning which, while being simply designed and operationally reliable, ensures uniform mixture of fuel and air.
It is a particular object of the present invention to provide solution to the above problems by a combination of the features expressed herein. Further advantageous embodiments of the present invention will be apparent from the description below.
Accordingly, the present invention provides for an essentially parallel arrangement to the main airflow direction of the center axes of the fuel openings through the film applicator, with regard to their radial orientation. This essentially parallel arrangement may deviate from absolute parallelism to an extent which is defined by a given acute angle. For purely constructional reasons, completely parallel fuel injection is not always possible. In accordance with the present invention, it is crucial that fuel injection has a large axial component, as a result of which the fuel will not be injected radially.
The fuel openings can be provided on a radially inner wall of the film applicator, but can also exit at a trailing edge of the film applicator.
The film applicator or the area of fuel injection, respectively, is preferably arranged between two swirlers.
It is particular advantageous if the fuel openings are additionally inclined in the direction of the air swirl, i.e. have an additional circumferential component. This component can be co-rotational or contra-rotational. Furthermore, the present invention provides for a single-row, multi-row, in-line or staggered arrangement of the fuel openings.
For even better mixture of air and fuel, the film applicator according to the present invention can also be of the lamellar design.
The present invention is more fully described in the light of the accompanying drawings showing preferred embodiments. In the drawings,
a and 2b (Prior Art) show a fuel nozzle with decentral, inward fuel injection according to the state of the art, with the detail of
a and 3b with
a and 4b with
a and 15b with
In the figures, like items are identified with like reference numerals.
a and 3b show, in simplified representation, a section through a film applicator 1 in accordance with the present invention, with fuel openings 2, in particular fuel holes 3, being illustrated whose center axes 5 are inclined at an angle α to the main flow direction 6 (near-wall flow direction in the inner swirl channel).
Reference numeral 16 indicates a yawing wall element of the film applicator 1, reference numeral 17 an aerodynamically conformal film applicator surface. Reference numeral 21 indicates a fuel line.
With the present invention, unintentional penetration of liquid fuel into areas with low flow velocities and the resultant non-uniform mixture of fuel and air are avoided.
Via the openings illustrated, the fuel is initially injected at an angle α inclined to the airflow direction, this angle being acute. In a preferred embodiment of the invention, the angle α is set at between 0° and 50°, inclusive, as well as within any range within that range. For instance, one embodiment is contemplated having an angle α of between 5° and 50°, inclusive, while another is contemplated having an angle α of between 10° and 30°, inclusive. Also contemplated are embodiments having an angle α of between 0° and 10°, inclusive, and between 0° and 5°, inclusive, as well as an embodiment that is essentially parallel.
Furthermore, the fuel openings can also be arranged circumferentially in co-rotation with or in contra-rotation to the airflow, respectively. The inclination enables the number of fuel openings to be reduced; at the same time, with the regions of high air velocity and, hence, high local air mass flows being present in the near-wall area of the outer wall of the swirled airflow, the depth of penetration is controlled. Upon ejection, the liquid fuel arrives, after a short route, at the surface of a yawing wall element of the film applicator on which a distribution of the film, or the formation of a fuel film, takes place in axial and in circumferential direction (see
A further embodiment of the present invention provides for injection of the fuel at the trailing edge of a flow divider between two swirlers (
A further embodiment of the present invention provides for a lamellar design of the film applicator. For this,
The advantage of the present invention is a practical solution to the problem of homogeneously premixing fuel with air, while achieving a defined, not too deep penetration of the fuel into the airflow with a minimum number of relatively large fuel openings. The general objective is the reduction of nitrogen oxide emission of the gas turbine combustion chamber by means of a robust, technically feasible fuel injection configuration.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
103 48 604 | Oct 2003 | DE | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3866413 | Sturgess | Feb 1975 | A |
3930369 | Verdouw | Jan 1976 | A |
3937011 | Caruel | Feb 1976 | A |
3955361 | Schirmer et al. | May 1976 | A |
3980233 | Simmons et al. | Sep 1976 | A |
4141213 | Ross | Feb 1979 | A |
4170108 | Mobsby | Oct 1979 | A |
4218020 | Reider | Aug 1980 | A |
4425755 | Hughes | Jan 1984 | A |
4974416 | Taylor | Dec 1990 | A |
5251447 | Joshi et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5303554 | Faulkner | Apr 1994 | A |
5351475 | Ansart et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5351477 | Joshi et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5373693 | Zarzalis et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5479781 | Fric | Jan 1996 | A |
5505045 | Lee | Apr 1996 | A |
5673551 | Dobbeling | Oct 1997 | A |
5680766 | Joshi et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5778676 | Joshi et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5816049 | Joshi | Oct 1998 | A |
5966937 | Graves | Oct 1999 | A |
6068470 | Zarzalis et al. | May 2000 | A |
6070411 | Iwai et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6119459 | Gomez et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6152726 | Ruck | Nov 2000 | A |
6360525 | Senior et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6363726 | Durbin et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6474569 | Brundish | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6532726 | Norster et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6609377 | Durbin et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6688109 | Hein | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6799427 | Calvez et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6968255 | Dimaridis et al. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6986255 | Smith et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7086234 | Doerr et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7546734 | Dorr et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7669421 | Saitoh et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
20020011064 | Crocker | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020174656 | Hein | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030089112 | Durbin et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030093997 | Stalder et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20040003596 | Chin et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040040311 | Doerr et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20050039456 | Hayashi | Feb 2005 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
3913124 | Jun 1989 | DE |
3819898 | Dec 1989 | DE |
4316474 | Nov 1994 | DE |
4424597 | Jan 1996 | DE |
19532264 | Mar 1997 | DE |
19729246 | Jan 1999 | DE |
0724115 | Jul 1996 | EP |
0994300 | Apr 2000 | EP |
1331441 | Jul 2003 | EP |
1420027 | Jan 1976 | GB |
2291179 | Jan 1996 | GB |
2327120 | Jan 1999 | GB |
Entry |
---|
German Search Report from corresponding application dated Apr. 14, 2010. |
European Search Report dated Jan. 18, 2012 for counterpart European patent application. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050133642 A1 | Jun 2005 | US |