This application is a U.S. National Stage Application of International Application No. PCT/EP2017/054055 filed Feb. 22, 2017, which designates the United States of America, and claims priority to DE Application No. 10 2016 206 369.3 filed Apr. 15, 2016, the contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.
The present disclosure relates to fuel injection systems. Various embodiments may include methods for ascertaining the servo valve closing time in piezo-driven injectors and/or to fuel injection systems in which such a method is used.
Typical fuel injection systems include at least one piezo injector, e.g., a piezo diesel injector. Such a piezo injector may include a piezo actuator which activates a closure element of the injector in an indirect way, e.g. via a servo valve. In such an injector with a servo valve, the injected quantity of fuel is defined essentially by the opening period of the servo valve. In this context, the opening time of the servo valve is measured on the basis of an electric feedback signal of the piezo actuator which acts as a sensor. However, with this method it is not possible to measure the closing time of the servo valve, since in this context the amplitude of the force acting on the piezo actuator is too low. As result, in this context there is still uncertainty with respect to the opening period of the servo valve.
It is known to estimate the closing time of the servo valve on the basis of three items of information:
However, this estimation method is influenced by various interference factors and is relatively inaccurate. For example, accuracy of +/−5 μs is not typically achieved (a typical value of the required accuracy of the injection quantity).
The teachings of the present disclosure may be used to implement a method which permits particularly accurate setting of the injected quantity of fuel. Some embodiments may include: carrying out an injection process and stopping the discharge phase of a piezo actuator; using the piezo actuator as a sensor and detecting the voltage profile at the piezo actuator; evaluating the voltage rise after the end of the discharge phase by comparing the corresponding feedback signal at the piezo actuator with a setpoint value; varying the discharge time of the piezo actuator until the feedback signal corresponds to the setpoint value, in order to obtain an optimized discharge time; and defining the servo valve closing time as a defined offset with respect to the optimized discharge time.
As an example, some embodiments include a method for ascertaining the servo valve closing time in piezo-driven injectors, comprising the following steps:
In some embodiments, the amplitude of the voltage rise at the piezo actuator is measured as a voltage rise.
In some embodiments, said method is carried out during the driving operation of a vehicle having a piezo-driven injector.
As another example, some embodiments include a fuel injection system having at least one piezo-driven injector and a control unit, characterized in that the control unit is designed to carry out the method as described above.
In some embodiments, the servo valve closing time which is ascertained by the control unit is used thereby to set the injected quantity of fuel.
The teaching are further explained in detail below with reference to an exemplary embodiment in connection with the drawing. In the drawings:
In a servo-operated injector there is a mechanical or hydraulic connection between the actuator and the servo valve. In the case of a piezo actuator, the latter can be used as a sensor for measuring the pressure profile in the valve space, e.g. during the closing phase of the servo valve. During this phase, the pressure in the servo valve space rises from approximately 5 to 10% of the rail pressure up to the rail pressure.
In order to measure this rise in pressure accurately, in the example method incorporating teachings of the present disclosure, the discharge phase is stopped and the voltage profile measured at the piezo actuator is acquired. Since the piezo actuator must primarily close the servo valve, the corresponding discharge time of the piezo actuator must be long enough to close the servo valve. On the other hand, the discharge time must be short enough to allow at least part of the rise in pressure to be measured. The correct discharge time is now ascertained.
In the case of a short discharge time, the signal quality is good, but the risk of a delay in the closing of the servo valve owing to an excessively short discharge time is high. On the other hand, in the case of a long discharge time the signal quality is poor. In some embodiments, to ascertain the suitable discharge time, the voltage rise at the piezo actuator is evaluated after the end of the discharge. In this context, the corresponding feedback signal is compared with a setpoint value, and the discharge time is changed until the feedback signal corresponds to the setpoint value. An optimized discharge time is then obtained.
The servo valve closing time is then defined as a defined offset with respect to the optimized discharge time. The servo valve closing time which is then ascertained can then be used to set the injected quantity of fuel, with the result that the accuracy with respect to the injected quantity of fuel can be improved. In some embodiments, the amplitude of the voltage rise at the piezo actuator may be measured as a voltage rise.
In some embodiments, the methods described may be carried out during the driving operation of a vehicle having a piezo injector, in particular piezo diesel injector. An on-board detection of the servo valve closing time therefore takes place. This on-board measurement is used to adapt the control of the injector, in order to reduce the tolerances of the injected quantity of fuel.
The teachings of the present disclosure may be applied to a fuel injection system having at least one piezo-driven injector and a control unit. In this context, specifically the servo valve closing time which is ascertained by the control unit is used thereby to set the injected quantity of fuel.
The exemplary embodiment described here relates to a fuel injection system of a vehicle which is provided with at least one piezo diesel injector and a control unit. The corresponding piezo diesel injector has a piezo actuator which activates a servo valve which serves to open and close a nozzle needle. The method described here involves ascertaining the servo valve closing time of the piezo diesel injector.
In step 1 of the method, in this context a customary injection process with a subsequent discharge phase of the piezo actuator for closing the servo valve is carried out, wherein the discharge phase is stopped. According to step 2, the piezo actuator is used as a sensor and the voltage profile at the piezo actuator is acquired after the end of the discharge phase.
According to step 3, the corresponding voltage rise is evaluated after the end of the discharge phase in that the corresponding feedback signal at the piezo actuator is compared with a setpoint value. Finally, in step 4 the discharge time of the piezo actuator is varied until the feedback signal corresponds to the setpoint value, in order in this way to obtain an optimized discharge time. In step 5, the servo valve closing time is defined as a defined offset with respect to the optimized discharge time.
The method is therefore concerned with ascertaining the optimized discharge time. In
In the case of the short discharge time, a good signal quality is present but the risk of a delay during the servo valve closing process is high. In the case of the long discharge time, the signal quality is poor. An optimum signal quality is obtained with the middle diagram.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2016 206 369 | Apr 2016 | DE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2017/054055 | 2/22/2017 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2017/178140 | 10/19/2017 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
20130257439 | Rodriguez-Amaya et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20150013647 | Zhang et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20160053704 | Russe et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160298563 | Zhang | Oct 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
10 2006 003 861 | Aug 2007 | DE |
10 2010 063 681 | May 2012 | DE |
10 2011 078 159 | Jan 2013 | DE |
10 2012 204 272 | Sep 2013 | DE |
10 2013 206 600 | Oct 2014 | DE |
10 2013 223 764 | Feb 2015 | DE |
1 400 675 | Mar 2004 | EP |
2010023041 | Mar 2010 | WO |
2017178140 | Oct 2017 | WO |
Entry |
---|
DE 10 2012 204 272 A1, US 2015/0013647 A1. |
DE 10 2010 063 681 A1, US 2013/0257439 A1. |
DE 10 2013 223 764 B3, US 2016/0298563 A1. |
DE 10 2013 206 600 A1, US 2016/0053704 A1. |
German Office Action, Application No. 10 2016 206 369.3, 5 pages, dated Dec. 2, 2016. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion, Application No. PCT/EP2017/054055, 21 pages, dated May 9, 2017. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190120156 A1 | Apr 2019 | US |