The present invention relates to a manufacturing method for fuel injector nozzles. The present invention more specifically relates to a manufacturing method for fuel injectors using a metal injection molding process.
One of the most critical parts of a fuel injector 10, such as the one seen in
As engine emission standards become more stringent, so does the need for improved fuel spray characteristics. This results in more complex fuel injector nozzle design and tighter dimensional tolerances which makes the manufacture of this part increasingly difficult, and therefore more expensive.
Also, the nozzle 20 needs to interface with the cylinder head 12 of the engine and also receives a needle 22 which acts as a fuel valve. These aspects of the nozzle 20 also require precision manufacturing.
An example of such a nozzle is shown in more details in
As can be seen in
Therefore, the nozzle 20 is usually made in two parts: the nozzle seat 30 and the nozzle insert 40. By doing this, at least part of the fuel passages 42 can be made as grooves in the outer surface 44 of the nozzle insert 40. When the nozzle insert 40 and the nozzle seat 30 are assembled together, the inner surface 36 of the nozzle seat 30 closes the grooves to make the fuel passages 42.
In an effort to simplify and to reduce the cost of making the nozzle insert 40, a manufacturing method known as metal injection molding (MIM) began to be used in recent years. The MIM process allows for an effective way to manufacture complex and precise parts at a relatively low cost. The MIM process uses pellets made of fine metal powders corresponding to the desired material of the part to be made mixed together with a polymeric binder.
The nozzle seat 150 is made using more traditional manufacturing method since it does not have the same level of complexity as the nozzle insert 140. The nozzle insert 140 and nozzle seat are bonded together using brazing at step 160. In order to braze the two parts together, plating, usually copper, is applied on the outer surface 44 (
The brazing step 160 has the inconvenient of causing metallic residue to buildup on the upper surfaces 34 and 46 (
Although the process shown in
Thus, there exists a need to provide a simplified method of manufacturing fuel injector nozzles.
One aspect of the present invention provides a simplified method of manufacturing fuel injector nozzles.
Another aspect of the present invention provides a method of manufacturing fuel injector nozzles using metal injection molding.
In another aspect of the invention, a method of manufacturing a fuel injector nozzle is provided where a nozzle insert and a nozzle seat are made using MIM. The nozzle insert and the nozzle seat are bonded together while in their green state to make a nozzle assembly. The nozzle assembly is then debinded and sintered.
Yet another aspect of the invention provides a method of manufacturing a fuel injector nozzle comprising: metal injection molding a nozzle insert in a green state, metal injection molding a nozzle seat in a green state, assembling the nozzle insert and the nozzle seat together while in their green states to obtain a nozzle assembly, debinding the nozzle assembly, and sintering the nozzle assembly.
In a further aspect, the method further comprises machining at least one of the nozzle insert and the nozzle seat while in their green states.
In an additional aspect, metal injection molding the nozzle insert and the nozzle seat is done simultaneously by using a common mold.
In a further aspect, the method further comprises bonding the nozzle insert and the nozzle seat together while in their green states prior to debinding the nozzle assembly
In yet a further aspect, bonding the nozzle insert and the nozzle seat together is done by using one of rotational welding, ultrasonic welding, and thermal welding.
In an additional aspect, debinding the nozzle assembly is done by using one of catalytic debinding, thermal debinding, and solvent debinding.
In another aspect of the invention, a method of manufacturing a single part from multiple parts is provided where a first part and a second part are made using MIM. The first and the second parts are bonded together while in their green state to make an assembly. The assembly is then debinded and sintered.
Yet another aspect of the invention provides a method of manufacturing a single part from multiple parts comprising: metal injection molding a first part in a green state, metal injection molding a second part in a green state, assembling the first part and the second part together while in their green states to obtain an assembly, debinding the assembly, and sintering the assembly.
In a further aspect, the method further comprises machining at least one of the first part and the second part while in their green states.
In an additional aspect, metal injection molding the first part and the second part is done simultaneously by using a common mold.
In a further aspect, the method further comprises bonding the first part and the second part together while in their green states prior to debinding the assembly
In yet a further aspect, bonding the first part and the second part together is done by using one of rotational welding, ultrasonic welding, and thermal welding.
In an additional aspect, debinding the assembly is done by using one of catalytic debinding, thermal debinding, and solvent debinding.
For purposes of this application, the terms “green state” refer to the state of an injection molded part after the injection molding process and the terms “brown state” refer to the state of a part after going through a debinding process which removes at least a portion of the polymeric binder found in the part when it is in its “green” state.
Embodiments of the present invention each have at least one of the above-mentioned aspects, but do not necessarily have all of them.
Additional and/or alternative features, aspects, and advantages of the embodiments of the present invention will become apparent from the following description, the accompanying drawings, and the appended claims.
Having thus generally described the nature of the present invention, reference will now be made to the accompanying drawings by way of illustration showing a preferred embodiment, in which:
The invention is described with reference to a fuel injector nozzle. However, it is contemplated that the method described herein can be used with any type of nozzles and assemblies having similar manufacturing requirements as a fuel injector nozzle.
Referring now to
The MIM material 210 is first heated and then injected into molds corresponding to the shapes of the nozzle seat 30 and the nozzle insert 40. In a preferred embodiment, the injection molding steps 215 are done simultaneously using a single mold 50 where the mold cavities for the nozzle seat 30 and the nozzle insert 40 are disposed side by side as seen in
The parts obtained from the injection molding process 215 are a nozzle insert in the green state 220 and a nozzle seat in the green state 225. Although not necessary, it may be desirable in some circumstances to machine the parts while their green state at step 226. It is easier to machine the parts while in their green state because the material is softer and the parts larger than at the end of the manufacturing process.
The nozzle insert 220 and the nozzle seat 225 are then assembled (step 230) and bonded, preferably using welding (step 235), while in their green state. The preferred welding method is rotational welding. Rotational welding consists in inserting one part inside another while rotating it such that the friction between the surfaces creates enough heat to melt the surfaces and create a weld when solidifying. The advantage of this type of welding is that the assembly 230 and welding 235 steps are done simultaneously. Other welding and bonding methods such as ultrasonic welding and thermal welding are possible without departing from the scope of the present invention. Under certain conditions, the sintering 255 of the nozzle assembly 240, described below, may cause the materials of the nozzle seat 30 and the nozzle insert 40 to bond together. It is therefore contemplated that the welding step 235 may be omitted. Under those conditions, and although not necessary, welding (step 235) would improve the bond between the two parts.
Once the nozzle insert 220 and the nozzle seat 225 are welded, the resulting nozzle assembly 240, which is still in the green state, undergoes a debinding process. During the debinding process, about 90 percent of the polymeric binder is removed from the part. The polymeric binder can be removed by using a solvent, applying heat sufficient to remove the binder but not melt the metal powder (thermal debinding), or applying heat in the presence of a catalyst. The later is known as catalytic debinding, and is the preferred debinding process. Catalytic debinding uses lower heat levels than thermal debinding which allows the parts to better maintain their shape and dimensions. The catalytic debinding process is also faster than the other debinding processes described above.
Once the debinding process 240 has occurred, the resulting nozzle assembly 250 is porous since the majority of the polymeric binder has been removed and is in a state known as the brown state. The nozzle assembly in the brown state 250 then undergoes a sintering process 255, which is the last portion of the manufacturing process. During sintering 255, temperature is gradually increased, initially removing the remaining polymeric binder, then causing the metal particles to fuse and bond together. This causes the nozzle assembly 250 to shrink in size. This shrinkage, however, is predictable and the molds are over-sized to compensate for this shrinkage. This way the final nozzle assembly 260 has the desired shape and dimensions. Also, the final nozzle assembly 260 requires no further manufacturing steps prior to using it in a fuel injector. It would however be possible to do so if desired.
This method takes advantage of the MIM process to be able to create complex geometries, and by assembling and welding the parts during their green state, the number of operations, and therefore the cost, is greatly reduced.
Modifications and improvements to the above-described embodiments of the present invention may become apparent to those skilled in the art. The foregoing description is intended to be exemplary rather than limiting. The scope of the present invention is therefore intended to be limited solely by the scope of the appended claims.
This application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application 60/695,013, filed Jun. 30, 2005, entitled “Fuel Injector Manufacturing Method”, the entirety of which is incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60695013 | Jun 2005 | US |