The field of the present invention is fuel rail assemblies for spark-ignited reciprocating piston internal combustion engines and in particular, fuel rail assemblies having crossover conduits such as tubes or hoses to allow fluid communication between two separate fuel rails for reciprocating piston, spark-ignited internal combustion engines.
In the past three decades, there have been major technological efforts to increase the fuel efficiency of automotive vehicles. One technical trend to improve fuel efficiency has been to reduce the overall weight of the vehicle. A second trend to improve fuel efficiency has been to improve the aerodynamic design of a vehicle to lower its aerodynamic drag. Still another trend is to address the overall fuel efficiency of the engine.
Prior to 1970, the majority of production vehicles with a reciprocating piston gasoline engine had a carburetor fuel supply system in which gasoline is delivered via the engine throttle body and is therefore mixed with the incoming air. Accordingly, the amount of fuel delivered to any one cylinder is a function of the incoming air delivered to a given cylinder. Airflow into a cylinder is effected by many variables including the flow dynamics of the intake manifold and the flow dynamics of the exhaust system.
To increase fuel efficiency and to better control exhaust emissions, many vehicle manufacturers went to port fuel injection systems, where the carburetor was replaced by a fuel injector that injected the fuel into a port which typically served a plurality of cylinders. Although port fuel injection is an improvement over the prior carburetor fuel injection system, it is still desirable to further improve the control of fuel delivered to a given cylinder. In a step to further enhance fuel delivery, many spark ignited gasoline engines have gone to a system wherein there is supplied a fuel injector for each individual cylinder. The fuel injectors receive their fuel from a fuel rail, which is typically connected with all or half of the fuel injectors on one bank of an engine. Inline 4, 5 and 6 cylinder engines typically have one bank. V-block type 6, 8, 10 and 12 cylinder engines have two banks.
One critical aspect of a fuel rail application is the delivery of a precise amount of fuel at a precise pressure. In an actual application, the fuel is delivered to the rail from the fuel pump in the vehicle fuel tank. At an engine off condition, the pressure within the fuel rail is typically 45 to 60 psi. When the engine is started, a typical injector firing of 2–50 milligrams per pulse momentarily depletes the fuel locally in the fuel rail. Then the sudden closing of the injector creates a pressure pulse back into the fuel rail. The injectors will typically be open 1.5–20 milliseconds within a period of 10–100 milliseconds.
The opening and closing of the injectors creates pressure pulsations (typically 4–10 psi peak-to-peak) up and down the fuel rail, resulting in an undesirable condition where the pressure locally at a given injector may be higher or lower than the injector is ordinarily calibrated to. If the pressure adjacent to the injector within the fuel rail is outside a given calibrated range, then the fuel delivered upon the next opening of the injector may be higher or lower than that preferred. Pulsations are also undesirable in that they can cause noise generation. Pressure pulsations can be exaggerated in a retumless delivery system where there is a single feed into the fuel rail and the fuel rail has a closed end point.
To reduce undesired pulsations within the fuel rails, many fuel rails are provided with added pressure dampeners. Dampers with elastomeric diaphragms can reduce peak-to-peak pulsations to approximately 1–3 psi. However, added pressure dampeners are sometimes undesirable in that they add extra expense to the fuel rail and also provide additional leak paths in their connection with the fuel rail or leak paths due to the construction of the damper. This is especially true with new Environmental Protection Agency hydrocarbon permeation standards, which are difficult to satisfy with standard O-ring joints and materials. It is desirable to provide a fuel rail wherein pressure pulsations are reduced while minimizing the need for dampers.
The present invention relates to a crossover conduit such as a tube or hose which connects fuel rails on a spark-ignited internal combustion engine. In one preferred embodiment, the crossover hose has a flattened section to improve flexibility and thereby reduce pressure pulsations in the fuel rail assembly. The present invention provides a fuel rail which provides damping characteristics which minimizes or eliminates any requirement for separate fluid dampeners to be added to the fuel rail.
Further features and advantages of the present invention will become more apparent to those skilled in the art after a review of the invention as it shown in the accompanying drawings and detailed description.
Referring to
The fuel rail has a series of outlets or orifices 18. Flexibly joined to the fuel rail adjacent to orifices 18 are injector cups 20. The injector cups 20 provide an aligning and mounting surface for fuel injectors (not shown). As shown, fuel rail 10 has three orifices 18 and supplies fuel to a bank on a V6 internal combustion engine (not shown). The fuel rail 10 has an orifice outlet which is provided with a connecting barbed male neck fitting 24. The fuel rail 12 is essentially similar to the fuel rail 10, with the exception that it does not have an inlet which is connected with the fuel pump.
To provide fluid communication for the fuel between the fuel rails 10 and 12, there is a crossover conduit provided by a hose 30. The hose 30 will typically have a structural portion wall thickness between 0.70 and 1.4 mm. The crossover hose 30 structural portion is preferably fabricated from a polymeric plastic material such as nylon/ETFE (copolymer of ethylene and tetrafluoroethylene) or other suitable alternatives. The crossover hose 30 has a 0.15 mm barrier layer formed of a fluoropolymer film such as that offered under the trademark TEFZEL® (copolymer of tetrafluoroethylene and ethylene) and an outside fire jacket which is typically formed of a thermoplastic elastomer material such as that offered under the trademark SANTOPRENE® or other fire resistant material such as the olefin alloy offered under the trademark ETHAVIN™ which can be 1.0–4.0 mm thick depending on burn test requirements. The technical specification of the hose will often be Society of Automotive Engineers' J 2045.
The crossover hose 30 has on its opposite ends female connections 34 to allow the crossover hose 30 to be joined with the fuel rails 10 and 12. The crossover hose, as shown, has a main body with a U shape, having non-flattened legs 36 and 38 which arc continuous with the end connections 24 and 34. The legs 36 and 38 have a generally enlarged diameter with respect to the diameter of the end connections 24, 34. The base of the channel shape provided by the crossover hose 30 has a generally flattened portion 40. Legs 36 and 38 juxtapose the flattened portion 40 from the end connections 24, 34. The flattened portion 40 has a width 42 which is generally larger than the diameter 44 of the end connections 34. In many instances it will be a 2:1 ratio over the diameter 44. The flattened portion 40 typically has a height 48 which is greater than the diameter 44 of the end connections 34.
In operation, pressurized fuel will be delivered to fuel rail 10 through inlet 13. Via inlet 13, fuel will be distributed to various injectors on one bank of a V6 engine via the orifices 18. Excessive fuel is deliberately pumped into fuel rail 10 so as to communicate with the fuel rail 12 via the crossover hose 30. Fuel rail 12 will supply fuel to the opposite bank of the V6 engine in a manner similar to fuel rail 10.
The opening and closing of the various fuel injectors will cause pulsations to be generated within the fuel rail assembly 7. Pulsations will be absorbed by the flattened portion 40 of the crossover hose being elastically deformed thereby. Increased pressurization will cause the flattened portion to expand in an attempt to take on a more circular shape. An enlarged volume will be created, thereby decreasing pressure. Under-pressurization will cause the degenerative flattened portion to collapse, thereby reducing the overall volume within the crossover hose and therefore inhibiting the decreasing pressure by reducing the overall volume of the fuel rail assembly 7. The main damping effect is provided by the structural portion of the crossover hose 30.
Referring now to
It will be apparent to those skilled in art that male end connections can be substituted for the female end connection 64, if so desired. Typically, the height of the flattened portion 62 of the crossover hose 60 will be less than the height of a crossover hose taken along sectional line 5—5.
Referring to
Referring to
In a similar manner, crossover hose 230 can be utilized in the fuel delivery system 113 with a crossover hose 130. If the body of a crossover hose 230 is identical with that of crossover hose 130, the non-symmetric feature can be provided with a fluid flow restrictor 237 provided in the crossover hose 230. The utilization of multiple crossover hoses in fuel delivery system 113 provides even more even cross flow and also gives a more equal temperature distribution since there are no dead end legs for the fuel delivery system.
Referring to
Referring to
It will be apparent to those skilled in the art that the fuel rail assemblies 307 and 407 may have dual crossover conduits or single ones.
The present invention has been shown in several embodiments. However, it will be apparent to those skilled in art of the various changes and modifications which can be made to the present invention without departing from the spirit or scope of the invention as it has been explained and as embodied in the accompanying claims.
This application is a divisional application of and claims priority to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/721,943 entitled “FUEL RAIL CROSSOVER HOSE”, filed Nov. 25, 2003, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,021,290 and hereby incorporated by referenced in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3810581 | Rhine et al. | May 1974 | A |
4586477 | Field et al. | May 1986 | A |
4697674 | Tangorra | Oct 1987 | A |
4794955 | Ejima et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
4798187 | Hudson, Jr. | Jan 1989 | A |
5056489 | Lorraine | Oct 1991 | A |
5080069 | Hudson, Jr. | Jan 1992 | A |
5168856 | Lorraine | Dec 1992 | A |
5511527 | Lorraine et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5516266 | Talaski | May 1996 | A |
5577479 | Popp | Nov 1996 | A |
5752486 | Nakashima et al. | May 1998 | A |
5845621 | Robinson et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5954031 | Ogiso et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
6019089 | Taylor et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6189510 | Jaeger et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6223725 | Onishi et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6354273 | Imura et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6371083 | Rossi et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6401691 | Kawano et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6415768 | Usui | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6431149 | Schwegler et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6505608 | Hiraku et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6601564 | Davey | Aug 2003 | B1 |
20010029929 | Natsume | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20020148446 | Gmelin | Oct 2002 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060137656 A1 | Jun 2006 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10721943 | Nov 2003 | US |
Child | 11336153 | US |