The present disclosure relates generally to fluid receptacles and, more particularly, to plastic fuel tanks and related components.
Plastic fuel tanks typically include a hollow body having one or more openings, and a plurality of fuel system components disposed in the interior of the body such as individual pumps, valves, and the like. The components may be inserted through the one or more openings, or may be molded in the interior of the body when the tank is manufactured. In some applications, one or more of the components may be mounted on a carrier that is inserted between molds in an interior of a parison that is blow molded around the carrier and into conformity with the molds. The carrier typically has standoffs or feet that contact corresponding portions of the tank to position and support the carrier within the tank. But such a carrier is basically another component to be supported within and by the walls of the fuel tank.
In use, fuel vapors in the tank are typically vented for temporary storage in a carbon canister until the vapors can be purged into the engine. But in some vehicle applications it is desirable to limit such venting of vapors and, as a result, the fuel tank may become pressurized which may be damaging to a tank.
A fuel tank for a vehicle according to one implementation includes a tank body having an upper wall, a lower wall, and side walls between the upper and lower walls and defining an interior in which fuel is stored. The tank also includes a plurality of fuel system components disposed in the interior of the tank body and including at least one of a rollover valve, a fuel level vent valve, a fuel tank isolation valve, or a fuel level indicator. The tank further includes an endoskeleton to reinforce the tank body, baffle fuel in the tank body, and carry the plurality of fuel system components in the tank body. The endoskeleton include a plurality of at least partially hollow columns to support the plurality of fuel system components, and a plurality of spaced apart generally horizontally extending first and second beams that are staggered with respect to one another such that the first beams are not directly above the second beams, and having tank contact portions attached to the upper and lower walls of the body. The endoskeleton also includes a plurality of obtusely walls extending between adjacent first and second beams to baffle fuel and to yieldably restrain movement of the upper and lower walls.
According to another implementation, a fuel tank for a vehicle includes a tank body defining an interior in which fuel is stored, and an endoskeleton disposed in the interior of the body to support the body. The tank body has a wall thickness of about 2 to 4 mm and a weight of the tank body and a weight of the endoskeleton combined is less than a weight of the fuel tank if it were about 4 to 6 mm in wall thickness.
According to a further implementation, a fuel tank for a vehicle includes a tank body defining an interior in which fuel is stored, and an endoskeleton disposed in the interior of the body support the body. An endoskeleton-to-tank body contact surface area ratio may be greater than about 4% of a total interior surface area of the tank body.
A support for a body of a fuel tank according to one implementation includes a plurality of at least partially hollow columns to support a plurality of fuel system components. The support also includes a plurality of spaced apart generally horizontally extending first and second beams being staggered with respect to one another such that the first beams are not directly above the second beams, and having tank contact portions. The support further includes a plurality of obtusely walls extending between adjacent first and second beams.
The following detailed description of exemplary embodiments and best mode will be set forth with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
Referring in more detail to the drawings,
For example, as shown in
Referring to
For example, the endoskeleton 22 may include a first column 34 to support a fuel pump module (not shown), and a plurality of other columns 36a-36d to carry the aforementioned components 26, 28, 30, 32. The columns 36a-36d may be of varying heights and sizes, extending in a generally vertical direction (when in the orientation shown in the drawings). Also, the columns may be at least partially hollow and socket-like for easy snap-in or frictional fit of the components 26-32.
Referring to
Referring to
Also, the columns 34, 36a-36d may include one or more apertures through the walls thereof. For example, as shown in
In general, the beams may be laterally-offset or spaced apart, generally parallel, and generally horizontally extending with respect to the columns 34, 36a-36d. Also, the beams may include tank contact portions that attachable to the walls of the tank body 12 to yieldably restrain movement of the tank body walls. More specifically, as shown in
The various beams may be interconnected by generally vertically extending walls. More specifically, as best shown in
The contact portions of the beams may be provided with tank locking features for mechanical bonding of the endoskeleton 22 with the tank walls. The tank locking features may include projections to project into the tank wall material, or undercuts that become at least partially filled with tank wall material to promote good attachment of the endoskeleton 22 to the fuel tank walls. More specifically, and referring to
In general, the endoskeleton 22 may include at a forward end a plurality of beams that may correspond to the aforementioned plurality of beams at the rearward end of the endoskeleton 22 and generally forward of the column 34. More specifically, referring to
The geometry and dimensions of the walls 154a-154d are such that the walls 154a-154d may double as both spring members and baffle members. When the first and second beams 150a, 150b, 152a-152c are displaced away from one another under expansion of the fuel tank body 12 due to, for example, pressure build up in the tank body 12, the walls 154a-154d flex to allow some such displacement but are resilient so as to urge the beams 150a, 150b, 152a-152c back to their rest position. For example, it is believed that the tank 10 may be able to withstand on the order of 100 mbar to 1 bar of internal pressure and yet control deflection of the tank walls to within about 10 mm. The endoskeleton 22 may also include spaced apart cross-members 157, 159 that may extend laterally or transversely between the first beams 150a, 150b and longitudinally between adjacent pairs of the walls 154 for lateral reinforcement. The cross-members 157, 159 instead or additionally could extend between the second beams 152a, 152b, 152c. Also, the walls 154a-154d may be segmented to define fuel flow passages 155a-155d between the walls 154a-154d. Although liquid fuel may wend and weave its way through the various passages 155a-155d in the walls 154a-154d, the walls 154a-154d tend to restrict en masse side-to-side sloshing of liquid fuel.
Referring now in general to
As shown in
Likewise, as shown in
The tank 10 may be produced with a relatively thin walled tank body 12 and may be lighter, even with the added endoskeleton 22, than a comparable tank that does not include the endoskeleton 22. For example, it is believed that the endoskeleton 22 reinforces the tank body 12 to such a degree that the tank body 12 can be produced with a mere 2 mm to 4 mm wall thickness. Such thin walls are in contrast to typical fuel tank wall thicknesses of 4 mm to 6 mm. As used herein, the terminology “thickness” may include average tank wall thickness over an entire tank body, plus or minus usual manufacturing tolerances.
Despite the added weight of the endoskeleton 22, the overall weight of the tank body 12 and endoskeleton 22 may be less than a corresponding conventional tank of corresponding volume. More specifically, the weight savings in reduced wall thickness to about 2 to 4 mm may result in a combined weight of the body 12 and endoskeleton 22 that is less than the weight of the tank body 12 without the endoskeleton 22 if the tank body 12 was about 4 to 6 mm in thickness and composed of the same material. According to one exemplary estimate, a tank with a wall thickness of about 5 mm and weighing 7.5 kg is replaceable with a tank having a body with wall thickness of about 3 mm and weighing 4.5 kg and reinforced with a 1 kg endoskeleton for a combined weight of only 5.5 kg. This extraordinary result is in stark contrast to conventional wisdom, which has dictated use of relatively thick tank walls having portions with increased—not decreased—wall thicknesses and use of thick integral posts or kiss-offs that tend to increase—not decrease—the weight of the fuel tank.
Also, the tank body 12 and endoskeleton 22 may provide improved strength to weight performance. Such performance may be quantified by (volume×pressure)/weight, where volume is tank volume, pressure is that pressure which the tank can resist without unacceptable deformation or rupture, and weight is tank weight. For example, a typical automotive fuel tank that is about 50 liters in volume, is about 20 kilograms in weight and provides about 100 millibar in pressure resistance. Thus, the typical tank strength to weight ratio is about (50 l×100 mbar)/20 kg, or about 250 l-mbar/kg. In contrast, according to the present disclosure, the tank body 12 and endoskeleton 22 may weigh only about 12.5 kg for the same 50 liter volume and 100 millibar pressure resistance, for a strength to weight ratio of about 400 l-mbar/kg. Accordingly, a tank assembly according to the present disclosure provides a strength to weight ratio that is greater than 250 l-mbar/kg and, more particularly, at least about 300 to 400 l-mbar/kg.
In general, the tank 10 may be manufactured according to techniques known to those skilled in the art, including injection molding, blow molding, vacuum drawing, and the like. Also, the tank 10 may be assembled according to known techniques, automatic or manual. Likewise, any suitable materials can be used in making the components, such as metals, composites, polymeric materials, and the like. Such materials can be selected based on their dimensional stability and resistance to swelling and degradation in warm and cold petroleum product environments. For example, the endoskeleton 22 may be injection molded and composed of virgin, regrind, or blended high density polyethylene (HDPE), and the tank body 12 may be blow molded and composed of HDPE, ethylene vinyl alcohol (EVOH), and adhesive layers.
While certain preferred embodiments have been shown and described, persons of ordinary skill in this art will readily recognize that the preceding description has been set forth in terms of description rather than limitation, and that various modifications and substitutions can be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. By way of example without limitation, while the fuel tank body 12 and endoskeleton 22 have been shown as being of particular geometry, any desired tank geometry may be used. The invention is defined by the following claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3314567 | Becker et al. | Apr 1967 | A |
3712502 | Basier et al. | Jan 1973 | A |
4878591 | Johnston | Nov 1989 | A |
4952347 | Kasugai | Aug 1990 | A |
5326514 | Linden et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5384172 | Takado et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5398839 | Kleyn | Mar 1995 | A |
6135306 | Clayton et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6293420 | Richter et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6338420 | Pachciarz et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6395357 | Abu-Isa | May 2002 | B1 |
6712234 | Boecker | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6978802 | Hagano et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
7166253 | Van Schaftingen et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7455190 | Potter et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
20020100759 | Schmidt et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20030015537 | Konja | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030136507 | Thiel et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20040011786 | Wade | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040129708 | Borchert et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20080110900 | Veenendaal | May 2008 | A1 |
20080224363 | Criel et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20090139994 | Aoki et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090189384 | Schoen et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2000-43588 | Feb 2000 | JP |
2005-162010 | Jun 2005 | JP |
2009-132297 | Jun 2009 | JP |
1074954 | Feb 1984 | SU |
Entry |
---|
Abstract written in English language for SU 1074954. |
Written Opinion & International Search Report for PCT/EP2010/063690, mailed Mar. 29, 2011, 8 pages. |
Translation of Japanese Office Action in JP 2012-529283 dated May 27, 2014. |
Text of First Office Action in CN 201080041613X issued on Apr. 24, 2014. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110068109 A1 | Mar 2011 | US |