The present invention will now be described, by way of example, with reference to the accompanying drawing, in which:
a is a side elevational view of a first embodiment of a vapor generator in accordance with the invention;
b is an isometric view of the first embodiment shown in
a is a cross-sectional view of a second embodiment of a fuel vapor generator in accordance with the invention;
b is an isometric view of the second embodiment shown in
The exemplifications set out herein illustrate various possible embodiments of the invention, including one preferred embodiment in one form, and such exemplifications are not to be construed as limiting the scope of the invention in any manner.
Referring to
An electrically heated vaporization element 28 is off-spaced from fuel injector 12 by standoff 20. Standoff 20 is perforated with a plurality of openings 24 to allow air 26 flowing through manifold 18 to pass through standoff 20. Atomized fuel spray 32 is directed from fuel injector assembly 12 onto vaporization element 28. Element 28 is connected to electrical leads 31,33 for control by a electrical circuit (not shown). In one aspect of the invention, element 28 is formed from a material having a positive thermal coefficient of resistance, as is known in the prior art and disclosed in, for example, U.S. Pat. No. 5,690,080, the relevant disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference. Alternatively, heating element 28 may take the form of a simple resistance wire heater, as is well known in the art.
In operation, a signal from a controller (not shown) causes fuel injector assembly 12 to inject a fuel spray 32 into standoff 20, which fuel spray strikes the surface of vaporization element 28 within standoff 20. Prior to contact of the fuel, vaporization element 28 is controllably heated by electric resistance to a predetermined surface temperature which is sufficient to cause virtually instantaneous vaporization of the fuel but is not high enough to cause ignition thereof. Air flow 26 passing through openings 24 in standoff 20 sweeps the vaporized fuel out of vapor generator 10 and forms a gaseous fuel/air mixture 27 within manifold 18. Fuel injector 12 is pulsed repeatedly over a predetermined period of time, as needed, to provide enhanced starting capability of the engine 100 (
Preferably, element 28 is energized before engine starting is desired, for example, by turning of a vehicle ignition key or by opening of the driver's door, to initiate a heating delay of a few seconds prior to onset of engine cranking, fuel injection, and spark ignition.
Referring to
Referring now to
Referring to
Referring to
A heater subassembly 380 is disposed in a cavity 382 formed in generator body 314 and having a window 384 exposing a heating element 328 to fuel spray 332 from injector assembly 312. Heater subassembly 380 may include an insulative backer 386 supportive of heating element 328 and an electrical connector 388 for connecting subassembly 380 to a control circuit (not shown).
Referring to
It should be noted that energizing a sheet metal heating element such as element 328 without spraying fuel on it can cause it to melt. Thus, a safety device in the form of a thermistor, PTC fuse, or other temperature sensing device (not shown) is preferably attached to the element to detect its temperature, a signal from which can be used to interrupt current to the heater to protect it either directly or through a control relay or transistor in known fashion.
As described above, fuel vapor generator 10,110,210,310 is especially useful in enhancing the cold starting capabilities of an internal combustion engine by providing a gaseous air/fuel mixture 27 to each of the runners 42 instead of the pure air supplied in prior art fuel injected engines. Fuels which can be difficult to start at low temperatures may include alcohols such as ethanol and methanol, alkanes such as gasoline, and combinations thereof. Engine injectors 44 may be operated normally upon starting, or their operation may be delayed and the engine run solely on mixture 27 for some period of time during warm-up, as further described below.
The desired amount of vapor supplied to the engine can vary with the engine state. There are a number of engine parameters associated with starting and running an engine, such as RPM, Manifold Air Pressure, coolant temperature etc. The engine's control system uses this information to optimize the operation of the engine based upon the conditions, and controls hardware such as the throttle position, spark timing, and injector timing.
The amount of desired vapor generated can vary in a similar manner. Ethanol fuel will burn only in vapor form. Fuel injectors form vapor by spraying fuel under pressure through small holes at the injector tip. At lower temperatures, the amount of liquid fuel converted into vapor from the injectors is diminished. This missing portion of vapor normally supplied by the injectors must be compensated by the fuel vapor generator. Since the vapor supplied from the engine injectors is variable, so must be the amount of desired vapor from the generator.
As the engine is started, the cylinder temperatures, Manifold Air Pressure, and RPM all change, as does the required total amount of fuel. Thus the desired amount of generated vapor will change as the starting sequence progresses, as will the required amount of heater power. Thus the injector and heater power in the fuel vaporizer must be modulated (profiled) as operation progresses. This can be as simple as time based (open loop control), or closed loop from the engine's crank sensor (RPM & Position), coolant sensor, etc. If control of the fuel vaporizer is conducted within the engine's ECM, this information is readily available at no additional overall cost and can be used to optimize the operation. If control is conducted from a separate stand-alone unit, then an open-loop time-based or temperature control system may be more suitable due to cost.
Under certain conditions, the fuel vaporizer may be required to supply the entire amount of fuel to start the engine. For example, at temperatures below about −5° C. the vapor conversion efficiency of the engine's fuel injectors is very poor (less than 1% of the fuel is converted into vapor form). This can result in wetting of the spark plugs with liquid fuel (known in the art as “flooding”), which can prevent the engine from starting. To prevent flooding and to permit starting under these conditions, an improved strategy may be employed wherein the engine's port or direct injectors are disabled and the entire amount of fuel is supplied from the fuel vaporizer for some period of time after starting. This of course necessitates sizing a larger and more powerful vaporizing unit to supply the additional quantity of vapor.
The vaporizer can also supplement the engine's fuel injectors after the engine starts and warms sufficiently to run well on only the injectors. After starting, the engine and fuel are still relatively cold, and the engine's injectors are still supplying only a fraction of the available fuel energy in vapor form, which limits the available engine torque. Auxiliary fuel supplied from the vaporizer after the engine starts can increase the amount of available engine power, thus improving vehicle drivability and customer satisfaction.
Various approaches may be used to control a manifold fuel vapor generator in accordance with the invention, for example:
Another form of vaporizer control within the scope of the invention is a “State Estimator”. Such a control strategy can utilize open-loop techniques to operate the vaporizer or may utilize any of the forms of feedback mentioned above. This form of control uses techniques similar to items #1 & #4 above.
In brief, a State Estimator mathematically models the system and adjusts the controllable features based upon an estimated present state.
The state of the system can be modeled from measurements taken (calibration) when the “Master” (standard) hardware is built. This is similar to the process used to calibrate fuel injectors. An automobile control system doesn't measure the amount of fuel supplied to the engine; fuel is metered via the injector's calibration. Fuel injection is is thus an open loop process. The control system can supply the desired amount of fuel from this calibration data. It outputs a pulse width modulation (PWM) signal that corresponds to the calibration data for the desired fuel flow.
Of course, the injector used in an engine isn't the same injector used for the actual calibration measurement wherein the calibration of a representative “Master” injector is measured. However, because the injector used in the vehicle is the same design as the “Master” with minor variations due to the tolerances of the parts, the actual flows are very similar. The same strategy applies to the injector used in the vaporizer.
The operating slope (change in temperature@ power/time) of the heating element can be easily established through laboratory measurements, as can the ethanol conversion efficiency which is the actual amount of ethanol converted into vapor versus the amount of ethanol that should theoretically be converted into vapor at the measured amount of power into the system. The conversion efficiency is used to estimate the required amount of power to control the heating element for a given fuel flow.
Too much or too little power supplied to the heating element can present problems. Too much power leads to too high a heater temperature which can lower the conversion efficiency by forming a vapor barrier between the fuel and the heating element, thereby decreasing the amount of heat transferred into the incoming fuel. Further increases in temperature can ignite the fuel or burn out the heating element. Too little power results in too little fuel being vaporized to start the engine.
Various factors such as the amount of fuel flow may affect the power conversion efficiency. Actual power conversion efficiency may be estimated by interpolating efficiency vs. fuel flow data as measured on the “Master” vaporizer.
Another control approach can utilize many of the concepts in the State Estimator control system to control the vaporizer's fuel injector, but instead of utilizing conversion efficiencies etc. to estimate the required power, the power to the heating element can be controlled by closed loop temperature control. As more fuel is sprayed onto the element, more heat is removed thus cooling the element and requiring more power to be supplied to the heating element. Control may be accomplished in more than one way.
A first way is to utilize a self limiting Positive Temperature Coefficient (PTC) heating element. As noted above, this is a heating element material that has a sufficiently high thermal resistance coefficient that the temperature is self regulated. As temperature increases so does resistance, decreasing the current and power flowing through the heating element. A limiting temperature is set somewhere above the fuel's boiling temperature but below the auto-ignition temperature. As the element cools from addition fuel, more power is automatically supplied to the element without any intervention from the vaporizer controller.
A second way is to utilize a thermistor or a PTC type circuit breaker attached to the heating element. As the trigger temperature of the control device is reached, the current is interrupted and heating ceases. Then as the heater element cools, the control device starts conducting again, thus repeating the cycle. Once again, no intervention from the vaporizer controller is required.
A third way is to attach one of the various temperature sensing devices directly to the heating element. This sensor is connected to a control system, and the measured temperature is used via P.I.D. control or some other available means to control the power to the heater.
It should be understood that numerous changes may be made within the spirit and scope of the inventive concepts described, including but not limited to other configurations, materials, and locations of vaporization elements. Accordingly, it is intended that the invention not be limited to the described embodiments, but will have full scope defined by the language of the following claims.
This application claims priority from U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/844,292, filed Sep. 13, 2006.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60844292 | Sep 2006 | US |