This application claims priority to European Patent Application EP09169559.3, filed Sep. 4, 2009, the contents of which are incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
The present invention relates generally to beverage cans and particularly to the size of the drinking aperture created in a beverage can end.
Conventional full aperture can ends include a score that extends about the major area of the end's center panel and defines a removable panel. A tab is attached to the removable panel by a rivet. The tab heel is lifted initially to rupture the score, and then the tab is pulled to propagate the score until the removable panel is fully detached from the remainder of the end. Typically, full aperture opening ends are seamed onto food can bodies by conventional means.
Full aperture food can ends are also typically designed to allow full product release of the foodstuff contained within the food can. Often, this foodstuff is packed under slight negative pressure. In applications in which the food can is under positive internal pressure, the internal pressures are relatively low and because the pressure's primary purpose is to maintain the structural rigidity of the food can, which is often relatively “thin-walled”.
The internal pressure in conventional beverage cans, such as for carbonated soft drinks or beer, typically is much higher than the internal pressures in food cans, resulting in concerns related to “blow-off” of the ends upon opening or when subjected to adverse handling. For these reasons, commercial beverage cans have ends defining a restricted aperture, which can be safely opened by a consumer.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,711,448, assigned to Reynolds Metals Company, describes a conventional “large opening end” (that is, and end having a large opening). The patent describes “standard size opening” of 0.5 square inches and a “larger opening” of 0.5 to 0.75 square inches, each of which represents a relatively small fraction of the center panel.
Full aperture beverage can ends have been sold in the past but had safety problems and have been withdrawn from the market. ‘Spiral scored’ ends were produced for Sapporo beer, where the can end was vented in its centre and then the score propagated to the edge of the can end panel and the around the periphery thereof. Venting was critical because the end was relatively large, 66 mm diameter with a 52 mm centre panel size. If the end was opened without being vented, the panel could explode and missile towards the consumer. Thus a vent was used to provide safe venting and release the internal pressure in the can before opening. However the resulting spiral geometry of the opened end panel was dangerous having several long exposed cut edges and for this reason, this can end configuration was withdrawn.
The present invention relates to a full aperture beverage can end that has a center panel and a countersink that surrounds the center panel. The can end further comprises a main score arranged in proximity to the countersink to define a removable aperture panel as well as a vent score. The can end is adapted for use with products that are pressurized to over 30 psi (200 kPa). During opening, the vent score is configured to sever before the main score. In this way, the pressure differential between the external surface and internal surface of the center panel reaches equilibrium gradually. This allows the main score to tear in a controlled and reliable manner.
The present invention may further comprise a tab attached to the center panel by a rivet. The tab functions to assist the user in opening the can end. Additionally the main score may have an outer wall proximate a lip of the end, an inner wall proximate the aperture panel, and a land at the base of the main score. The land has a thickness that is smaller proximate the main score outer wall than the land thickness proximate the main score inner wall. This configuration allows the land to remain affixed to the aperture panel after detachment of the aperture panel.
According to another aspect of the present invention, a full aperture beverage can having rated for internal pressure of over 30 psi (200 kPa) includes a can body and a can end. The can end includes a center panel, a countersink surrounding the center panel, a tab attached to the center panel by a rivet, a main score that defines a removable aperture panel, and a vent score formed in the aperture panel. The main score has an outer wall proximate a lip of the end, an inner wall proximate the aperture panel, and a land at the base of the main score. The land has a thickness that is smaller proximate the main score outer wall than the land thickness proximate the main score inner wall. Accordingly, the land remains affixed to the aperture panel after detachment of the aperture panel.
The can may also be rated for internal pressures of at least 70 psi, 85 psi, or 90 psi. Preferably, the centerline of the main score is located between 0.000 and 0.020 inches, more preferably between 0.000 inches and 0.010 inches, more preferably between 0.000 inches and 0.006 inches, more preferably between 0.000 inches and 0.004, and most preferably between 0.000 inches and 0.002 inches, from a center of a transition radius between the countersink and the center panel.
A nose of the tab in its rest state is radially inwardly spaced apart from an inner edge of the main score by between approximately 0.000 inches and 0.008 inches, more preferably between approximately 0.000 inches and 0.005 inches, measured horizontally. In its partially actuated state, in which the tab nose contacts the center panel, the nose of the tab is approximately between the centerline of the main score and 0.005 inches radially inboard from an inner edge of the main score—more preferably within 0.002 inches of an inner edge of the main score.
Among the benefits for consumers are that because the beverage can becomes more like a drinking glass, consumers can drink from the can from any orientation and the can contents can be sipped rather than poured into the mouth. Furthermore, the content of the can is visible after opening, showing the colour, level of carbonation, and head (with widgeted beers).
One of the benefits for fillers is that the cans may be sold at festivals and events, as they can no longer be used as missiles. The larger, full aperture ensures that once opened, the majority of the beverage does not remain in the can is thrown. Furthermore, sealed beverage cans are preferable to glasses as they can be freshly opened immediately upon serving and thus many drinks can be freshly served in the interval periods during events.
The present invention will now be described, by way of example only, with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
A can assembly 10 includes a one-piece can body 12 and a can end 14 that are joined together at a seam 16. Preferably, can body 12 and seam 16 are conventional according to commercial carbonated beverage standards.
Countersink 22 extends from the lower part of wall 20 and includes a curved bottom portion 24 and an inner wall 26 that extends up from bottom 24. Inner wall 26, in the first embodiment (
Center panel 30 includes a rivet 34, a moustache score 46, a main score 50, and an anti-fracture score 52. Rivet 34 preferably is conventional. A tab 36 is attached to center panel 30 by rivet 34. Tab 36 preferably is a solid tab—that is, without an integral hinge. Center panel 30 preferably is approximately planar in its unseamed or unpressurized state.
Moustache score 46 is configured to enable venting of pressurized can assembly 10. For internal pressures greater than 30 psi, the vent score described in co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/796,072, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference, is preferred. As tab 36 is lifted by its handle or heel 38, moustache score 46 is designed to break before main score 50 to vent the internal pressure in can 10.
Main score 50 extends about the periphery of center panel 30 and defines a removable aperture panel 54. As shown in the Figures, tab 36 is attached to aperture panel 54. As is conventional, anti-fracture score 52 is also located on aperture panel 54 radially inside of main score 50 to reduce stress and take up slack metal. Upon removal of aperture panel 54, a lip 32 is left behind. Lip 32 is the portion of end 14 that extends radially inwardly from the inside edge of the seam 16. Further, aperture panel 54 may include debosses and embosses, as explained more fully below.
The inventors have identified the importance of configuring end 14 in such a way that main score 50 is in a location on end 14 that is sufficiently stiff to promote initial rupture of score 50 upon initial actuation of tab 36.
Preferably, the centerline of main score 50 is near countersink 22 at the location of contact between tab nose 40 and center panel 30 such that the structural stiffness of countersink 22 prevents excessive panel deflection to promote initial score fracture. For example, the horizontal distance between transition curve origin C and the vertical center of main score 50 may be as low as 0.000 inches (that is, falling on the same vertical axis). Preferably, the centerline of main score 50 does not extend radially outside of point C so that the main score does not interfere with the structural performance of countersink 22. In the embodiment of
Thicknesses T-a and T-b may be chosen according to the desired parameters of end 14, such as proximity of score 50 to countersink 22, end thickness and material, desired pressure rating, tab configuration, and the like. For the embodiment shown in
The score residual at thinner end 56x of score land 56 tends to fracture more readily than that at thicker end 56y. This tendency is an advantage in controlling the location of the fracture within main score 50. In this regard, the cross sectional structure of score 50 is configured such that the score residual of land 130c remains attached to aperture panel 54 rather than to lip 32 (that is, because the score residual at land outer end 56x is thinner than that at land inner end 56y), therefore leaving lip 32 having a fillet configuration.
The inventors have found also that for a given score, the structure and operation of the tab affects the reliability and predictability of the main score fracture. In this regard, if tab nose 40 is too far from main score 50, end 14 may fracture between main score 50 and anti-fracture score 52 or within anti-fracture score 52, rather than solely in main score 50. Measured upon actuation of tab 36 when tab nose 40 first contacts end 14 and before main score fracture, tab nose 40 preferably does not span across main score 50 to touch the outer score wall 51x. Preferably, tab nose 40, upon contact with end 14, is at the centerline of main score 50 or on aperture panel 54 within 0.005 inches radially inboard of the inner edge 60 of main score 50 (
The location of tab nose 40 may also be measured with the tab in its at-rest state before actuation by a user. In this regard, tab nose 40 preferably is between approximately 0.000 inches and 0.008 inches from the inner edge 60 of main score 50, and more preferably between 0.000 inches and 0.005 inches, as measured radially inwardly from edge 62. The difference in location of tab nose 40 relative to main score 50 between its initial contact state and its at-rest state is to account for shunting during the tab actuation process. Tab 36 shunts forward in the end shown in
The location of tab nose 40 relative to main score 50 may be chosen according to the design parameters of the particular end, such as main score configuration, tab design, vent score design, can internal pressure, and other factors that will be understood by persons familiar with can end engineering and design upon considering the present specification.
Vent score 46 includes a central portion 42, a pair or lateral portions 45a and 45b, and a pair of side portions 49a and 49b. As best shown in
Dimensional information of vent score 46 is provided with reference to the enlarged view of the tool 80 for forming the vent score in
Side portions 49a and 49b are mutually spaced apart and extend rearwardly such that flap 57 creates sufficient area for venting. The vent hole is shown in
Vent score sides may be curved or straight, and oriented at any angle A, measured relative to primary reference line PL. For example, A may be approximately zero (that is, the vent score sides may be approximately parallel to primary reference line P-L), between +/−10 degrees, between +/−20 degrees, or between +/−30 degrees. In the embodiment shown in the figures, angle A is 5 degrees. Central portion 42 and lateral portions 45a and 45b may be shapes other than as shown in the figures.
As illustrated in
Once the main score 50 has completely severed the resulting aperture panel 54 and it is discarded, a user can drink directly from opening 58.
Each of ends 14a, 14, 14c, and 14d are seamed onto a can body 12a, 12b, 12c, 12d.
End 14a of
End 14b of
End 14d of
The present invention has been described with respect to particular embodiments, and it is understood that the present invention encompasses structure and function broader than the particular embodiments, even if labeled as preferred.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
09169559 | Sep 2009 | EP | regional |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
D30094 | Busch | Jan 1899 | S |
D30338 | Mann | Mar 1899 | S |
2683579 | Wallace | Jul 1954 | A |
3301464 | Amberg | Jan 1967 | A |
3406866 | Jasper | Oct 1968 | A |
3477608 | Fraze | Nov 1969 | A |
3485410 | Boik | Dec 1969 | A |
3951299 | Khoury | Apr 1976 | A |
4002262 | Khoury | Jan 1977 | A |
4096967 | Kaminski | Jun 1978 | A |
4182460 | Holk, Jr. et al. | Jan 1980 | A |
RE30349 | Silver | Jul 1980 | E |
4271778 | Le Bret | Jun 1981 | A |
D265280 | Conti | Jul 1982 | S |
D286508 | Tilden | Nov 1986 | S |
4809861 | Wilkinson et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
5052573 | Zysset | Oct 1991 | A |
D328864 | Grunzweig | Aug 1992 | S |
5232114 | Zysset | Aug 1993 | A |
5356256 | Turner et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
D356456 | Henry | Mar 1995 | S |
D358988 | Nolte | Jun 1995 | S |
5582319 | Heyes et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
D379588 | Pledger et al. | Jun 1997 | S |
5711448 | Clarke, III | Jan 1998 | A |
5860553 | Shubert | Jan 1999 | A |
D406236 | Brifcani et al. | Mar 1999 | S |
5911551 | Maran | Jun 1999 | A |
5934498 | Jordan | Aug 1999 | A |
5957647 | Hinton | Sep 1999 | A |
5971259 | Bacon | Oct 1999 | A |
6065634 | Brifcani et al. | May 2000 | A |
6089072 | Fields | Jul 2000 | A |
D431413 | Schaper et al. | Oct 2000 | S |
D480304 | Stodd | Oct 2003 | S |
D488376 | Chung | Apr 2004 | S |
6848875 | Brifcani et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6915553 | Turner et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
D515353 | Martin | Feb 2006 | S |
D525127 | Cogley et al. | Jul 2006 | S |
7100789 | Nguyen et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
D559680 | Jacober et al. | Jan 2008 | S |
7341163 | Stodd | Mar 2008 | B2 |
D567657 | Hall et al. | Apr 2008 | S |
D570213 | Newman | Jun 2008 | S |
7500376 | Bathurst et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7506779 | Jentzsch et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
D591149 | Bonner et al. | Apr 2009 | S |
7673768 | Reed et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7743635 | Jentzsch et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7922025 | Heinicke | Apr 2011 | B2 |
20040026433 | Brifcani et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20050284869 | Mills | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20070029324 | Watson et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20080067171 | Heinicke | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20100059530 | Niec et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
527102 | Aug 1972 | CH |
0737624 | Oct 1996 | EP |
1577222 | Sep 2005 | EP |
1813540 | Aug 2007 | EP |
2070826 | Jun 2009 | EP |
09169559.3 | Sep 2009 | EP |
1358427 | Jul 1974 | GB |
1453131 | Oct 1976 | GB |
2168313 | Jun 1986 | GB |
47-22064 | Nov 1972 | JP |
S58-109922 | Jul 1983 | JP |
59-133439 | Sep 1984 | JP |
S59-209533 | Nov 1984 | JP |
2000-128168 | May 2000 | JP |
WO 03068615 | Aug 2003 | WO |
WO 2009002715 | Dec 2008 | WO |
WO 2010020375 | Feb 2010 | WO |
Entry |
---|
U.S. Appl. No. 29/368,323: Notice of Allowance dated Dec. 3, 2010, 6 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 29/363,498: Notice of Allowance dated Nov. 29, 2010, 6 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 29/363,492: Notice of Allowance dated Nov. 30, 2010, 7 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 29/363,500: Notice of Allowance dated Nov. 30, 2010, 6 pages. |
Ball Packaging Europe, “Full aperture tear-off end”, http://www.ball-europe.com/382—349—ENG—PHP.html, accessed Dec. 2, 2010, 1 page. |
“Nuts About Cans!”, Rexam PLC, Beverage Packaging: Product News, Apr. 7, 2005, 2 pages. |
English translation of Japanese Patent Application No. 2012-527320: Notification of Reason for Rejection dated Apr. 2, 2014, 3 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110056945 A1 | Mar 2011 | US |