An oil well may have multiple production zones or intervals. It is of interest for the operator to be able to produce these zones altogether (commingled production) to maximize production and the return on investment made in such well. The different producing zones may have different pressures and may deplete at different rates. To optimize production or even shut off a water producing zone, the operator relies on downhole flow control valves (FCVs) that control the flow of hydrocarbon from each producing interval into the production tubing string. The same applies for an injection well where selective and controlled injection into the different intervals involves controlling the flow of fluid at each interval.
FCVs are traditionally hydraulically operated from surface by hydraulic control lines running from in the well and fed through the well head and packers. Because the number of penetrators or allowable control lines is limited, this may restrict the number of valves that can be installed in a well. Moreover, such a well often includes chemical injection lines and electrical cable for communication and power of downhole sensors, thus restricting even further the number of hydraulic penetrations left at the well head or packer.
In general, a system and methodology are provided for facilitating flow control downhole. According to an embodiment, a flow control valve has an internal piston. Additionally, an electrically powered actuator is mounted externally to the flow control valve and connected to the internal piston via a linkage. The electrically powered actuator responds to electrical inputs to shift the internal piston to desired flow positions of the flow control valve.
The flow control valve can include a housing, with the internal piston movably disposed within the housing. The actuator can be held in place along an outer surface of the housing with one or more clamps or protectors. An outer surface of the housing can include one or more grooves. The actuator can be disposed in one of the one or more grooves. The outer surface of the housing can have a first groove housing the actuator and a second groove housing electronics and/or sensors.
The actuator can be an electro-mechanical actuator (EMA) or an electro-hydraulic actuator (EHA).
A system including the flow control valve and actuator can further include a pump system and a manifold. The pump system includes a motor and a pump. The manifold includes hydraulic circuitry that links the pump system to the actuator. The pump system is configured to pump hydraulic control fluid from a reservoir through the manifold to the actuator. The manifold can include at least one solenoid operated valve (SOV).
Mechanical intervention for mechanically shifting the flow control valve can be performed while the actuator is connected to the internal piston of the flow control valve. In some configurations, the linkage can be disconnected to enable mechanical intervention for mechanically shifting the flow control valve.
The flow control valve can be mounted along a well tubing. The flow control valve can have a flow area equivalent to an internal cross-sectional area of the well tubing.
In some embodiments, a method of operating a flow control valve includes powering up a pump system configured to pump hydraulic control fluid from a reservoir; activating a selected solenoid operated valve (SOV) in a manifold comprising hydraulic circuitry linking the pump system with an electro-hydraulic actuator mounted externally to the flow control valve; flowing hydraulic control fluid from the reservoir, through the manifold, and into a chamber of the actuator such that a piston of the actuator moves in an open or a close direction; and moving a piston of the flow control valve by movement of the piston of the actuator.
The SOV can be a 3-way, 2-position, normally closed valve. The SOV can be a 2-way, 2-position, normally open valve. The SOV can act as a directional switch.
The method can further include performing mechanical intervention on the actuator by using a shifting tool to mechanically move the piston of the actuator.
In some embodiments, a flow control valve includes a housing; a piston movably disposed within the housing to adjust flow through the flow control valve; at least one groove formed in an outer surface of the housing, the at least one groove housing an electrically powered actuator; and a linkage coupling the actuator to the piston such that movement of the actuator causes movement of the piston.
The at least one groove can include a first groove housing the actuator and a second groove housing electronics. The actuator can be an electro-hydraulic actuator. The electro-hydraulic actuator can include an internal piston. In use, movement of the internal piston of the actuator causes movement of the piston of the flow control valve to adjust flow through the flow control valve.
However, many modifications are possible without materially departing from the teachings of this disclosure. Accordingly, such modifications are intended to be included within the scope of this disclosure as defined in the claims.
Certain embodiments of the disclosure will hereafter be described with reference to the accompanying drawings, wherein like reference numerals denote like elements. It should be understood, however, that the accompanying figures illustrate the various implementations described herein and are not meant to limit the scope of various technologies described herein, and:
In the following description, numerous details are set forth to provide an understanding of some embodiments of the present disclosure. However, it will be understood by those of ordinary skill in the art that the system and/or methodology may be practiced without these details and that numerous variations or modifications from the described embodiments may be possible.
The disclosure herein generally involves a system and methodology to facilitate flow control downhole. According to embodiments, the system and methodology provide mechanical architectural elements for the design of an electrically powered downhole flow control valve (FCV). A solid gauge mandrel type design for a FCV may restrict the maximum allowable production flow rate through the valve. In contrast, FCVs according to the present disclosure can have a flow area that may be equivalent to the tubing internal cross section.
Various embodiments described herein cover options for integrating an Electro-Mechanical Actuator (EMA), mounted externally to the valve, and connecting it to the FCV internal piston. This permits use of a traditional FCV choke design with an internal piston, a hard erosion resistant sleeve for the flow openings, and existing choke sealing elements. Embodiments also cover the implementation of an Electro-Hydraulic Actuator (EHA) in lieu of the EMA. As the available power source for the actuator is electrical, the EHA also may include a hydraulic fluid reservoir and an electrically powered pump to provide the pressurized hydraulic fluid. In addition, the present disclosure provides several options for controlling the position of FCV while actuated with the EHA or EMA. Various embodiments described herein relate to the linkage between the actuator and the FCV internal piston, in the case of an EMA drive. The linkage system may include options for a disconnect ability in case it is desired to mechanically intervene and operate the valve through slickline or other mechanical intervention methods.
In subsea fields, hydraulic flow control valves utilize the infrastructure on the seabed to handle and distribute pressurized hydraulic fluid to each well head and each hydraulic control line. In conventional systems, this functionality represents a substantial cost and complexity for the subsea infrastructure, the umbilical, and the surface platform or FPSO. Removing the need to handle pressurized hydraulic fluid can lead to substantial reduction in cost of the subsea infrastructure.
A fully electric downhole flow control system helps overcome both of these limitations especially when other (traditionally hydraulically operated) equipment in the well is converted to full electric as well (e.g. the safety valve). A high number of electrically powered flow control devices can be connected on a single electrical cable, thus using just one penetrator at the wellhead. Electrical power it is used to operate such a completion system, simplifying greatly the system on the seabed and potentially also simplifying the umbilical to the production facility.
A valve providing a flow area equivalent to the tubing inner cross-sectional area is referred to as a “Full Bore” valve. Traditional hydraulic full bore valves have an internal piston to control the amount of opening and flow through a choke. Given the size of the piston, sealing systems and bearings around the piston, substantial loads may be used to operate such a valve by overcoming the amount of friction generated by the dynamic and choke seals. Hydraulically operated valves can easily provide the desired load via a high hydraulic supply pressure and a large piston area. Converting such valves to an electric drive poses some challenges as the load provided by an electromechanical actuator is usually lower than what can be delivered by traditional hydraulic FCVs.
One way to address this challenge is to implement the electric drive on a smaller valve, such as a side-pocket mandrel valve. In such an arrangement, the choke, piston and sealing systems are much smaller and utilize substantially less force, at the expense of a reduced flow area and limited maximum allowable flow rate through the valve. For applications involving high flow rates, the challenge is to find a suitable way of integrating an electrically powered actuator mechanism able to deliver sufficient force to operate a full bore valve.
Referring initially to
Full bore FCVs may rely on an internal piston moving back and forth, e.g. up or down, to open or close hydraulic flow ports which selectively places the annulus and the tubing in fluid communication. While the upper section of the FCV is dedicated to the actuation and position indexing mechanism, the choking (or flow control) and sealing functions of the valve are done at the choke section. As shown in
In FCVs according to the present disclosure, a section, for example, an upper section when deployed in a horizontal portion of a well, of the flow control valve may be modified to house an electrical actuator 200, for example as shown in
As further illustrated in
As described,
In various embodiments, the electrically powered actuator 200 driving the FCV can be an electro mechanical actuator (EMA), which receives electrical power as input, e.g., from one or more electrical cables 270 as shown in
Referring generally to
Another option for driving the FCV piston 104 is an electro-hydraulic actuator (EHA) (for example, as shown in the example embodiment of
In use, the pump provides pressurized hydraulic fluid to operate the EHA. A manifold can distribute the pressurized hydraulic fluid to one or the other hydraulic chamber 282, 284 of the actuator. One chamber is used to push the FCV to an open position, the other one to push the FCV to a close position. In other words, flow of hydraulic fluid from the reservoir, through one of the ports 283, 285 into one of the hydraulic chambers 282, 284 moves the piston 280 in a direction that thereby moves the piston 104 of the FCV in a direction that opens the FCV, and flow of hydraulic fluid from the reservoir, through the other port 283, 285 into the other hydraulic chamber 282, 284 moves the piston 280 in the opposite direction, thereby moving the piston 104 of the FCV in the opposite direction to close the FCV.
As shown in
In some configurations, to reduce the number of ports and/or ensure the oil volume internal to the bellows 288 is always connected to the lowest pressure of both hydraulic chambers 282, 284, the third port 287 may be replaced by an inverse shuttle valve 290, as illustrated in
For the configurations illustrated in
Referring generally to
In the first example manifold implementation illustrated in
An example of an FCV actuation sequence or method includes the steps of: 1. Power up motor of the pump system 350 such that the pump generates pressure in the hydraulic circuitry up to a max of Pr (cracking pressure of the relief valve); 2. Activate the desired SOV 356a, 356b so the EHA 200 starts moving; 3. De-activate the activated SOV to stop the EHA 200 movement; and 4. Stop the motor and pump (or pump system 350). This circuitry is compatible with mechanical intervention as both EHA hydraulic chambers 282, 284 are in direct communication when the SOVs 356a, 356b are not activated, thus allowing EHA piston 280 movement without hydraulic lock.
In the second example manifold implementation illustrated in
An example of an FCV actuation sequence or method of the embodiment of
In the third example manifold implementation illustrated in
To be compatible with mechanical intervention, an additional relief valve 372 is used as illustrated in
An example of an FCV actuation sequence or method for opening the valve of the embodiment of
With respect to position measurement, the measurement of the displacement of the piston can be done multiple ways. A first method is by direct measurement of the FCV piston 104 position via a position sensor (e.g. LVDT, resistive, AMR, acoustic, or other appropriate sensor). The position sensor, e.g., sensor 240, can be located in its own groove in the FCV main housing 118 in parallel to the actuator 200 and other electronics 230, as shown in
Other methods of position measurement also may be employed, such as providing measurement components inside the actuator 200. Examples include: 1. A resolver counting motor turns in the EMA can provide displacement information of the mechanical actuator. This can translate directly to the FCV piston 104 position once the position measurement is calibrated (record the full close position for instance). 2. Time-based actuation for the electro hydraulic actuator: each of the three illustrated hydraulic circuit embodiments includes a flow regulator 354 that outputs a constant flowrate regardless of the differential pressure across it. With the information of the hydraulic fluid rate flowing to the EHA piston chamber it is straightforward to determine the displacement of the actuator as a function of the actuation duration. Once the system is calibrated, the actual FCV position can be computed easily.
Depending on the embodiment, various types of linkages 300 may be used between the FCV piston 104 and the electrically powered actuator 200. For example, with an electro hydraulic actuator 200, the linkage 300 between the FCV piston 104 and the actuator 200 itself can be a straight anchoring. This will provide a simple technical solution for transmitting the load and displacement from the actuator 200 to the piston 104.
As the hydraulic circuitry embodiments described herein are compatible with mechanical intervention, the FCV piston 104 can be operated with a shifting tool 400 while still connected to the actuator 200. The actuator 200 will not create hydraulic lock which could otherwise prevent the mechanical override of the FCV. The embodiment of hydraulic circuitry shown in
When the FCV is equipped with an electro mechanical actuator 200, there may be a desire to unlatch the actuator 200 from the piston 104. Unlatching permits overriding mechanically the valve position without damaging the actuator 200 in case the drive screw is not reversible (i.e. the assembly of the screw, gearbox, and motor will not rotate back regardless of the load applied on the actuator axles). In this particular case, the linkage mechanism 300 should include a releasable latching system such as a collet or a disengaging system. Examples of two embodiments include: 1. A shear system. A piece in the linkage 300 will break at a controlled load exceeding the nominal operating load of the actuator 200, thus releasing the piston 104 from the actuator 200. An example of such shear system is the shear pin used in packers, breaking at a specified effort; and 2. An elastic latch system that will disengage once the axial load exceeds the latching force. The latch can be re-engaged later by moving the piston manually or operating the actuator if its function is not lost.
Although a few embodiments of the disclosure have been described in detail above, those of ordinary skill in the art will readily appreciate that many modifications are possible without materially departing from the teachings of this disclosure. Accordingly, such modifications are intended to be included within the scope of this disclosure as defined in the claims.
The present application claims priority benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/688,843, filed Jun. 22, 2018, the entirety of which is incorporated by reference herein and should be considered part of this specification.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2019/038438 | 6/21/2019 | WO |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2019/246501 | 12/26/2019 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3417827 | Smith | Dec 1968 | A |
4796699 | Upchurch | Jan 1989 | A |
5293551 | Perkins et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5358035 | Grudzinski | Oct 1994 | A |
5832996 | Carmody | Nov 1998 | A |
5906238 | Carmody et al. | May 1999 | A |
6148843 | Pringle | Nov 2000 | A |
6152224 | French | Nov 2000 | A |
6176318 | Drakeley et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6199628 | Beck et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6269874 | Rawson | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6273194 | Hiron et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6405803 | Giroux et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6422317 | Williamson, Jr. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6484800 | Carmody et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6494265 | Wilson et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6543544 | Schultz et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6648073 | Jernigan et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6691587 | King | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6715558 | Williamson | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6763892 | Kaszuba | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6869063 | Gunnarsson et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6951331 | Haughom et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
7055598 | Ross et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7377327 | Jackson | May 2008 | B2 |
7445047 | Gomez | Nov 2008 | B2 |
8281863 | Voss | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8505294 | Willauer et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8757278 | Smithson | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8978750 | Noske | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9222340 | Holderman et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9228423 | Powell | Jan 2016 | B2 |
9376889 | Reid et al. | Jun 2016 | B2 |
9540912 | Fripp et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
10100608 | Fripp et al. | Oct 2018 | B2 |
10132420 | Long | Nov 2018 | B2 |
10287851 | El Mallawany | May 2019 | B2 |
10358899 | El Mallawany et al. | Jul 2019 | B2 |
10563481 | Richards | Feb 2020 | B2 |
10570698 | Peyregne et al. | Feb 2020 | B2 |
10670160 | Phelps | Jun 2020 | B2 |
10745998 | Prost | Aug 2020 | B2 |
10830012 | Holmes et al. | Nov 2020 | B2 |
10907444 | Brown | Feb 2021 | B1 |
10961819 | Honeker et al. | Mar 2021 | B2 |
10995584 | Noel | May 2021 | B2 |
10995586 | Gonzales Panta et al. | May 2021 | B2 |
11105183 | Frosell et al. | Aug 2021 | B2 |
20020108747 | Dietz et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20030019622 | Goodson, Jr. et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20040173362 | Waithman | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20070056745 | Contant | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20080053662 | Williamson et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20090078427 | Patel | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090301732 | Turner et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100038093 | Patel | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100236790 | Smithson | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20120037360 | Arizmendi, Jr. et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120067593 | Powell | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20140034308 | Holderman et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20150198016 | Langlais | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20160245076 | Logan et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20170044869 | Patel | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20180223625 | Noel | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20180245428 | Richards | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20180283137 | Peyregne et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20200355054 | Fripp | Nov 2020 | A1 |
20200392812 | Vick, Jr. | Dec 2020 | A1 |
20210115767 | Tajallipour | Apr 2021 | A1 |
20210198975 | Honeker et al. | Jul 2021 | A1 |
20210222515 | Honeker et al. | Jul 2021 | A1 |
20210254432 | Honeker et al. | Aug 2021 | A1 |
20210324708 | Candido Gomes | Oct 2021 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1020140033910 | Mar 2014 | KR |
2540762 | Feb 2015 | RU |
2620700 | May 2017 | RU |
2017058258 | Apr 2017 | WO |
2017070766 | May 2017 | WO |
2019125465 | Jun 2019 | WO |
2019246501 | Dec 2019 | WO |
2021262703 | Dec 2021 | WO |
2022006529 | Jan 2022 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Preliminary Report on Patentability issued in PCT/US2019/038438, dated Dec. 30, 2020 (9 pages). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion of PCT Application No. PCT/US2021/040319 dated Oct. 19, 2021, 10 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion of PCT Application No. PCT/US2021/038459 dated Sep. 27, 2021, 10 pages. |
“What is a 3-way Solenoid Valve”, downloaded from the internet at [https://web.archive.org/web/20170802031323/https:/instrumentationtools.com/3-way-solenoid-valve/] retrieved on May 18, 2022, 6 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in PCT/US2019/038438, dated Oct. 2, 2019 (12 pages). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20210254431 A1 | Aug 2021 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62688843 | Jun 2018 | US |