The amount of power transferred from an alternating current (AC) power source to an electrical load such as a motor, heater, etc., must often be controlled to match the power required by the load. For example, a motor for a fan or a pump may need to run at different speeds depending on the amount of air or fluid to be moved. As another example, an electrical resistance heater may need to operate at various points between full power and off depending on the particular heating load.
Numerous methods have been devised for controlling AC power including phase control, resistive voltage reduction, and damping networks. With AC phase control, switching devices such as silicon controlled rectifiers (SCRs), triacs, transistors, etc., are used to switch the power source on at a variable point or phase angle in the AC line cycle. The switching device either turns itself off automatically or is turned off at the end of the AC line cycle. The phase angle at which the switching device is turned on determines the average power delivered to the load.
With resistive voltage reduction, a variable power resistor in the form of a potentiometer or rheostat is connected in series between the AC power source and the load. As the power resistor is swept through its resistance range, the voltage seen by the load, and therefore, the power transferred to the load, is varied.
A damping network typically includes a parallel and/or series combination of resistors and capacitors coupled in series between the power source and the load. The component values are selected so that only a fixed portion of the power available from the AC source is transferred to the load. To provide multiple power levels, multiple damping networks, each designed to transfer a different amount of power to the load, are switched into and out of the load circuit.
Selecting an AC power control technique for a particular application typically involves making tradeoffs between various factors such as performance, convenience, cost (including cost for manufacturing, installation, operation, etc.), energy conservation, aesthetics, etc. In some applications, the tradeoffs are particularly difficult to balance, and adequate solutions have not been found.
One example of such an AC power control application is controlling the speed of a fan motor for exhaust, ventilation, cooling, etc., in building environments. Fan motors often need to run at different speeds depending on the rate at which air must be moved into, out of, and/or within a building. The design challenges are often compounded by the requirement that the fan speed controller must be located within an electrical box, such as a wallbox, which has limited space, cooling capacity, etc.
One prior art technique for controlling AC power to a fan uses resistive voltage reduction where a rheostat is connected in series with the fan. As the power resistor is swept through its resistance range, the voltage applied to the fan, and therefore its rotational speed, varies. Rheostats that are capable of controlling the speed of even smaller fan motors are expensive, bulky, and dissipate a large amount of heat. Under some operating conditions, the rheostat may dissipate more heat than the fan itself. This heat is difficult to remove from the wallbox in which the rheostat is mounted. Rheostats also tend to be difficult to operate because actuators for linear or rotary rheostats typically require a large amount of force to operate.
Another prior art technique for controlling power to a fan motor involves AC phase control as illustrated in
Phase control presents several problems. For example, if the switch is turned on at any phase angle that is not close to 180 or zero degrees, the abrupt increase in current (di/dt) generates electromagnetic interference (EMI) and noise in the switching circuit and fan motor where windings may act as loudspeakers. This effect is especially pronounced near the peaks of the AC waveform where the di/dt is at a maximum. EMI is harmful to both the switching circuit and other equipment. Thus, bulky and expensive EMI filters may be required. EMI filters also dissipate additional heat which must be removed from the circuitry. Moreover, the di/dt current surges may be destructive to the switching device which must therefore be oversized to accommodate high peak currents.
Another prior art technique for controlling power to a fan motor involves the use of multiple damping networks as illustrated in the system of
Damping networks also present several problems. For example, each damping network must have an impedance that is coordinated with the impedance of the fan motor. Thus, many different models of fan speed controllers must be designed, manufactured, stocked, etc. This also increases the possibility of mistakenly installing the wrong controller which is costly and time consuming to replace and presents a potential safety hazard as well.
Another problem is that multiple switches are required to connect the different damping networks to the motor. These switches must carry all of the fan load current. If implemented as a multi-position mechanical switch, it may require a large amount of force to actuate, and the contacts must be numerous and heavy enough to carry the load current for all speed settings as well as high voltage transients caused by switching an inductive load. If implemented as solid state devices such as triacs, SCRs, etc., multiple sets of devices are required, as well as the associated drive circuitry which further increases the cost. Another problem is the heat generated by the damping networks which is wasteful and must be removed from the wallbox or other enclosure in which the fan speed controller is mounted.
As shown in
In this example, after cycle 10 is complete, the pattern for the specific power level is repeated beginning at cycle 1. In some other embodiments, however, non-repeating patterns may be used. In yet other embodiments, a random or quasi-random sequence of groups of ON cycles and OFF cycles may be used to maintain some average power level. In still other embodiments, a sequence of different patterns may be repeated to provide a finer level of granularity in the average power level.
A group of cycles may include one or more consecutive cycles during which a similar level, type, form, etc. of power is applied to a load. Thus, a group of ON cycles may include one or more consecutive ON cycles during which full power is applied to the load, a group of OFF cycles may include or one or more consecutive OFF cycles during which no power is applied to the load, a group of low voltage cycles may include one or more consecutive cycles during which a reduced voltage is applied to the load, etc.
In some applications, it may be beneficial for the groups of ON cycles to have the most uniform number of cycles possible and to be spaced as evenly as possible.
In other applications, it may be beneficial to purposely vary the number of ON cycles in each group and/or spacing of groups.
In yet other applications, the load or loads may be relatively insensitive to the particular groupings of ON cycles in the pattern. Thus, the specific pattern may be determined based on the ease of implementation rather than performance issues.
In some applications, the length or other characteristics of the pattern of full cycles may be coordinated with various characteristics of the load. As an example, it may be beneficial to keep the pattern length shorter than the perceptible response time of the load to prevent individual full cycles or groups of full cycles from causing perceptible fluctuations in the load.
For example, if a fan motor is abruptly switched from full power to completely off, it may take ¼ second for an observer to notice the motor is slowing down. Thus, a pattern length that is less than ¼ second may be adequate.
The perceptible response time may vary greatly for different types of loads. An incandescent lamp may create perceptible fluctuations in light output even with a pattern that is only a few cycles long at 60 Hz, whereas there may be no perceptible fluctuation in the output from a resistance heating element even with a cycle pattern that is a few seconds long. Similarly, an exhaust fan with a low-inertia squirrel-cage rotor may exhibit audible fluctuations when driven with a certain pattern length, whereas a ceiling fan with long, heavy blades may produce no perceptible speed fluctuations at all when driven with the same pattern length.
Some additional inventive principles of this patent disclosure relate to driving one or more loads with full cycles from more than one AC power source. In some embodiments, a load may be driven with cycles from a first AC power source having a relatively high voltage alternating with cycles from a second AC power source having a relatively low voltage. An example is illustrated in
In some other embodiments, full or partial cycles from other types of AC power sources may be combined to control the power to one or more loads. For example, cycles from one AC power source may be combined with cycles from one or more other AC power sources having different frequencies, waveforms, phases, impedances, etc., or various combinations thereof.
Depending on the implementation, controlling power to a load in accordance with some inventive principles of this patent disclosure may provide various benefits. For example, it may be possible to connect several loads in parallel and drive them with the same pattern of cycles and achieve uniform performance across all of the loads. Moreover, it may be possible to obtain this benefit even where there is a large disparity in the size, type, etc., of the parallel loads.
As another example, driving a load with full AC cycles in accordance with some inventive principles of this patent disclosure may reduce or eliminate noise, inrush current and/or EMI because the power may be switched at or near zero crossings. This may reduce or eliminate audible noise in the load, as well as electrical noise and/or EMI caused by switching when high levels of voltage and/or current are flowing through the switch. Thus, a full cycle may refer not only to a complete cycle of the AC power source where switching is right at the zero cross, but also to a substantially complete cycle where the switching is close enough to a zero cross to provide a beneficial result. Moreover, a full cycle may refer to full cycle of voltage, current, or other parameter. A pattern of full AC cycles may include some AC cycles that are less than full cycles, but still have enough full cycles to provide beneficial results.
The AC power source 34 may include a common sinusoidal AC power source such as the 50/60 Hz power typically utilized throughout the world at various voltages. However other AC power sources with different frequencies, waveforms, voltages, etc., may be used. The AC waveform may also have an offset such that the waveform does not go negative during part of the cycle, but has a pulsating DC or hybrid characteristic, or is otherwise asymmetric.
The one or more electrical loads 36 may include motors, heaters, lights, actuators, or any other load where it may be beneficial to control the amount of power it receives from an AC power source.
The switches 42 and synchronization feature 48 may be implemented in any suitable manner as discussed above with respect to the embodiment of
In some embodiments, a control system having full cycle control according to the inventive principles may be realized as a wiring device which serves as a connection and control point for building wiring. In some embodiments, such a wiring device may be configured to fit inside a standard electrical box such as a wallbox, ceiling box, etc. In some other embodiments, such a wiring device maybe configured to fit in a central panelbox or other enclosure for building wiring.
In some other embodiments, a control system may be integral with an appliance such as a ceiling fan, lamp, heater, etc. In still other embodiments, a control system maybe included in a portable switching device that it may be removed from an interior or exterior building space without disconnecting any permanent building wiring. For example, the control system may be implemented with a cord-connected power strip that may be removed from a first office by unplugging it from a receptacle and moved to second office. In yet other embodiments, a control system may be implemented with a local switching device which may be connected to a load without any building wiring between the local switching device and the load. For example, a local switching device may be implemented with a receptacle that is mounted in a wall outlet and configured to connect to a load that is plugged in to the receptacle.
In some embodiments, a control system may be configured to fit in an accessible electrical box which can, for example, include a junction box that is accessible such as a wall box, a ceiling box, a floor box, or the like. Thus, accessible includes accessible to an end user. For example, a wall box installed in a wall with a trim plate would be an accessible electrical box.
The embodiment of
The components illustrated in
The controller 60 may be implemented in analog or digital hardware, software, firmware, or any suitable combination thereof. In some embodiments, the controller may include a microcontroller or other form of microprocessor which generates a gating signal to control the power switch. The patterns of ON and OFF cycles may be stored in lookup tables, generated through mathematical algorithms, or derived in any other suitable manner.
The conductive power loss PL of the transistors is given by PL=I2(2R) where I is the RMS value of the on-state current through the transistors, and R is the on-state resistance of each MOSFET. In some embodiments, the use of MOSFET transistors may result in lower power loss compared to some other switching circuits.
An inductive load such as a fan may generate high back EMF noise voltage resulting in a reversal of the voltage polarity across the triac which may turn the triac off. Using two parallel triacs, and applying a positive gate current to one and a negative gate current to the other may assure that one triac switch is always on independent of the voltage polarity across the triacs. Two current drivers may be used to gate the two triacs.
The power loss PL of the triacs is given by PL=IVT where I is the RMS value of the on-state current through the conducting triac, and VT is the on-state voltage drop across the triac, typically about 1.4 volts. In some embodiments, the use of triacs may result in a lower cost compared to some other switching circuits.
In some embodiments, the use of a single power switching triac gated by an opto-triac pilot may provide a lower cost compared to some other switching circuits.
In some embodiments, the fan speed controller of
Various inventive principles of this patent disclosure may provide valuable benefits when implemented in an embodiment like the fan speed controller of
Moreover, triacs or other switches and damper components generate heat which wastes energy and must be removed from the controller. Eliminating these components may also eliminate their associated heat sinking and/or removal apparatus which may further reduce the manufacturing costs, and may also reduce the size of the wiring device so that it fits more easily into an electrical box, thereby reducing installation costs. Further, reducing or eliminating the heat dissipation from switches and RC dampers may conserve energy and reduce operating costs.
Some additional benefits of full cycle power control according to some inventive principles of this patent disclosure may stem from the ability to switch the state of a power switch at or near a zero cross. This may reduce or eliminate EMI which is harmful to other equipment in a building environment. In turn, this may reduce or eliminate the need for EMI suppression circuitry which may reduce both the power consumption and/or cost of the controller. Switching at or near zero crosses may also reduce inrush currents which may improve the reliability of both the controller, as well as the fan or other equipment being controlled. Reduced inrush currents may also reduce the size and cost of the power switch needed in the controller.
The ability to control multiple parallel fan motors and/or fan motors of different types and sizes from a single wiring device may also provide valuable benefits. Conventional fan speed controllers having multiple RC dampers for different motor speeds are only able to operate with specific types and sizes of fan motors. This increases the cost to manufacture, specify, order, stock, install, and inspect numerous models of controllers. It also may create safety hazards and reduce reliability because of the increased likelihood of installing the wrong controller. Because a fan speed controller according to some inventive principles of this patent disclosure may be able to control multiple parallel fan motors and/or fan motors of different types and sizes from a single wiring device, it may reduce or eliminate some or all of these problems.
In some other embodiments, a fan speed controller similar to the one described above with respect to
In some other embodiments, a fan speed controller similar to the one described above with respect to
The inventive principles of this patent disclosure have been described above with reference to some specific example embodiments, but these embodiments can be modified in arrangement and detail without departing from the inventive concepts. For example, some of the embodiments have been described in the context of fan speed control, but the inventive principles apply to other types of electrical loads as well. Any of the control circuitry and logic described and claimed herein may be implemented in analog and/or digital hardware, software, firmware, etc., or any combination thereof. As another example, some of the embodiments have been described in the context of interior building spaces, but the inventive principles apply to exterior or hybrid spaces as well. Such changes and modifications are considered to fall within the scope of the following claims.