Full field mammography with tissue exposure control, tomosynthesis, and dynamic field of view processing

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 8416915
  • Patent Number
    8,416,915
  • Date Filed
    Thursday, May 19, 2011
    13 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, April 9, 2013
    11 years ago
Abstract
A mammography system using a tissue exposure control relying on estimates of the thickness of the compressed and immobilized breast and of breast density to automatically derive one or more technic factors. The system further uses a tomosynthesis arrangement that maintains the focus of an anti-scatter grid on the x-ray source and also maintains the field of view of the x-ray receptor. Finally, the system finds an outline that forms a reduced field of view that still encompasses the breast in the image, and uses for further processing, transmission or archival storage the data within said reduced field of view.
Description
FIELD

This patent specification is in the field of mammography systems and methods, and is particularly applicable to using large field, flat panel, digital x-ray receptors.


BACKGROUND

X-ray mammography systems typically use an x-ray source mounted at one end of a rotatable c-arm assembly and an image receptor at the other. Between the x-ray source and the image receptor is a device for compressing and immobilizing a breast. Until recently, the image receptor was typically a screen-film cassette, which generated an image related to the detected transmission of x-rays through the breast. The device for compressing the breast against the image receptor, or a breast tray covering the receptor, is often called a paddle, and comes in a variety of sizes to match both the cassette size and the breast size. Such matching is desirable because the use of a small size paddle on a large breast can result in uneven and inadequate breast compression and may not allow full-breast imaging, while using a large paddle on a small breast can impede access to the breast, which is important during the compression cycle in order to optimize the amount of breast tissue brought into the field of view of the image receptor.


New mammography systems are now being introduced to use digital image receptors in place of screen-film, and have many well recognized advantages. Such a system is currently available from the assignee hereof under the trade name Selenia. Further information thereon, found at www.loradmedical.com/selenia, is hereby incorporated by reference in this disclosure. The Selenia system uses a digital flat panel detector made by the Digital Radiography Corp. division of the assignee hereof, located in Newark, Delaware. The panel has a 24×29 cm field of view. Various other aspects of a mammography system and method are describe in commonly assigned provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/350,213 filed Oct. 19, 2001 and International Application No. PCT/US02/33058 filed Oct. 17, 2002, which is hereby incorporated by reference.


Mammography systems often have provisions for partly or fully automating the selection of appropriate technic factors for an x-ray exposure, such as one or more of kVp (the x-ray tube accelerating potential), mA (x-ray tube current), and exposure time. When a film-screen image receptor is used, this can be done by relying on exposure detectors at the other side of the film from the x-ray source. An imaging exposure of the breast is stopped when these exposure detectors indicate that they have received a sufficient amount of x-radiation. This is not believed practical for use with flat panel image receptors for a number of reasons. Accordingly, one known approach for use with digital flat panel image receptors is to take a short, low x-ray dosage pre-exposure after the breast has been compressed, and then take an imaging exposure while the breast remains immobilized, using technic factors based on measurements taken with the same receptor in the pre-exposure.


Another aspect of mammography is proposals for tomographic imaging or tomosynthesis. In principle, a tomographic image of a plane in the breast can be obtained by moving at least one of the x-ray source and the image receptor relative to the breast during the x-ray exposure. If the x-ray source and the image receptor move in opposite directions in parallel planes, with the appropriate geometry, a plane in the breast that is parallel to the image receptor remains in focus during the entire exposure while the images of all other planes in the breast are blurred and become background noise in the final image. One known approach is to keep the image receptor stationary but move the x-ray source in a path suitable for tomosynthesis. One problem with this is that this limits the field of view for the tomosynthesis image. Another is that this makes it difficult to effectively control the effects of scattered radiation as it becomes difficult to maintain the commonly used anti-scatter grids focused on the focal spot of the x-ray source. Yet another problem is that this arrangement allows for only relatively shallow (small) angles relative to a normal to the plane of the receptor.


Yet another aspect of mammography using flat panel digital image receptors is the transmission and storage of images. Many health facilities had image storage systems such as PACS, and protocols such as DICOM exist for formatting medical x-ray images for storage and future use. However, in many if not most cases, the breast takes up only a part of the image taken with flat panel digital receptors such that an imaginary rectangle that envelops the image of the breast is smaller than the field of view of the receptor. One proposal has been made for use with a fan beam of x-rays scanning a flat panel digital image receptor, and is believed to involve eliminating from storage image areas that do not contain an image of the breast. However, that proposal is believed to be specific to the use of a scanning fan beam of x-rays.


The system and method disclosed in this patent specification are designed to overcome these and other disadvantages of the known prior proposals. The cited patents are hereby incorporated by reference in this patent specification.


SUMMARY

An object of the disclosed system and method is to provide a particularly effective and advantageous exposure control for mammography using flat panel, digital x-ray receptors, using an estimate of the thickness of the compressed breast and of breast density.


Another object is to improve tomosynthesis in mammography, preferably while retaining the benefits of a focused anti-scatter grid and avoiding a reduction of the field of view.


Yet another object is to improve the efficiency of x-ray image storage and transmission, particularly for mammography images, by selective use of decreased effective image size.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING


FIG. 1 illustrates a digital mammography system in which preferred embodiments disclosed herein can be implemented.



FIG. 2 is a flow chart illustrating processes of estimating and using tissue exposure control in a mammography system.



FIG. 3 illustrates a focused anti-scatter grid that can be used in the system of FIGS. 3 and 1.



FIG. 4 illustrates an aspect of tomosyntesis in mammography.



FIG. 5 illustrates selection of a decreased size mammography image for storage and transmission.



FIG. 6 illustrates processes involved in selecting a reduced size image for transmission and storage.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

Referring to FIG. 1, a mammography system currently available from the common assignee under the trade name Selenia except for the new features described herein, comprises a stand 10 supporting a C-arm 12 that can move up or down along stand 10, to a selected height, driven by motor(s) controlled by a health professional operating the system. C-arm 12 carries an x-ray tube at an upper end 12a, a breast tray 12b at a lower end. Tray 12b covers a flat panel x-ray image receptor 12c, spaced from the tray by a focused anti-scatter grid 12d (which may be retractable so that it can be removed from the space between tray 12b and receptor 12c). C-arm 12 also carries a compression paddle 12e that is between source 12a and breast tray 12b and is motorized to move away from tray 12b so a patient's breast can be fitted between tray 12b and paddle 12e, and closer to tray 12b so the patient's breast can be compressed and immobilized. The movement of paddle 12e is motorized and controlled by the health professional. Different size paddles 12e can be fitted to suit different breast sizes for best compression. In addition, the health professional can move paddle 12 along the width of tray 12b to a position in which paddle 12e matches the position of a breast that is not centered on tray 12b, as in the Selenia system currently offered by the common assignee. The system further includes other components, such as a control station 14 comprising interface devices such a keyboard 14a and trackball 14b, a display screen 14c, and control and image processing facilities.


In order to carry out tissue exposure control, the currently available Selenia mammography system is modified to incorporate the equipment and process steps illustrated in FIG. 2. In particular, a paddle position encoder 20 measures the position of paddle 12e relative to tray 12b as the health professional positions, compresses and immobilizes the patient's breast for imaging. The thickness of the immobilized breast can be measured or estimated in other ways instead. For example, the final position of paddle 12e can be measured in some way, e.g. mechanically or optically or in some other way. The thickness of the immobilized breast may be measured or estimated directly in any one of a number of ways. A calculator 22, which can be implemented by suitably programming the processing unit 14 (FIG. 1) calculates the thickness of the compressed and immobilized breast on the basis of the output of encoder 20, or some other means for measuring breast thickness indicators, and provides information about breast thickness for a tissue exposure control calculator 24, which again can be implement through such programming.


To estimate technic factors, calculator 24 also relies on information about the x-ray density of the breast. Such information can come from one or more different sources. One example is manual input 26, e.g., keyboard 14a (FIG. 1), through which the health professional can input information characterizing the density of the breast. For example, the system can present the health professional with three choices—fatty, normal, and dense—and the health professional can make the appropriate choice based on any one or more factors such as physical examination of the breast, information from previous views in the same examination or taken at a much earlier time, or other information about the patient. Another example of a source of information about breast density is previous x-ray images (views) of the patient's breast or breasts. A previous view can be one taken at any earlier time, either in the same visit of the patient or at a previous visit. Information about density can be derived from the previous view(s) by the health professional, or it can be derived automatically—by measuring the overall density of a previous x-ray image and perhaps knowing the technic factors used to take it. If actually measured, the density information from the previous view(s) can be provided to calculator 24 manually or automatically, through a connection from the measuring device to calculator 24. Another source of density information is a dual energy arrangement 30 that pulses the immobilized breast with a low dose x-ray energy at each of two different energies, e.g. sequentially, and the measurements of x-rays with receptor 12c (FIG. 1) at each of the energies are used in a known process, similar to that used in bone densitometry, to estimate breast density and automatically or manually provide the estimate to calculator 24. X-ray tube 12a can be used for such dual energy process, using two different x-ray filters to emit x-rays at the appropriate to different energies or energy bands. Yet another source of information about breast density can be an arrangement 32 that measures the force with which paddle 12e compresses the breast and the time such force acts from the start of compression until the breast is immobilized for imaging, and supplies such force/time information to calculator 24, manually automatically.


Calculator 24 can be implemented as look-up table that in effect has an entry for each of a number of combinations of breast thickness and breast density values. The initial values of the entries can be estimated by actual tests, in essence a trial-and-error process, or in some other way. Calculator 24 provides its output to technic factor display 34, which can be display 14c (FIG. 1), at which the health professional can see the automatically estimated factors such as one or more of kV, mAs, filter, time, etc. An entry device, which can be keyboard 14a, allows the health professional to confirm or modify the automatically estimated parameters, and control 38 (which can be a part of unit 14 of FIG. 1) uses the resulting final tissue exposure control technic factors for an imaging x-ray exposure.


The examples disclosed in this patent specification refer to compressing and immobilizing the breast before determining technic factors and imaging. However, alternatives are contemplated in which the breast need not be compressed before imaging; the breast may be simply supported in some manner, such as by a breast tray, or may be suspended in some manner between an x-ray source and an image receptor. In such a case, the breast thickness and density information can come from different sources, such as measurements or estimates of the thickness of the uncompressed breast, or an average of the thickness of the breast portion that will be imaged, of the thickness of the part that is of particular interest for imaging. The density information may come from the health professional, or from prior x-ray images of the breast, or from some other source. The same alternative of imaging the uncompressed breast applies to the other two features discussed below—tomosynthesis and selecting a reduced field of view image for transmission and/or storage—where the alternative dispenses with compression but otherwise conforms to the description below.


Another feature of the mammography system disclosed here is tomosynthesis that to both allows a large field of view and the use of a focused anti-scatter grid. As illustrated in FIG. 3, anti-scatter grid 12d is focused to allow the passage of x-rays along paths 40 that emanate from the focal spot of x-ray source 12a and to suppress (scattered) x-rays that travel along other paths. If such a grid changes its orientation relative to the x-ray source, it would undesirably suppress x-rays that it should be passing. Such change in orientation would result if x-ray tube 12e moves in a direction transverse to the x-ray beam it emits while grid 12d and detector 12c remain stationary. In addition, such motion would reduce the field of view, so a portion of the breast projected on the receptor in one position of the moving source may fall outside the receptor outline at another position of the source.



FIG. 4 illustrates an arrangement that overcomes these deficiencies of a known proposal. In FIG. 4, x-ray tube 12a and the combination of anti-scatter grid 12d and receptor 12c rotate as a unit while a compressed and immobilized breast remains between them and in the path of x-rays emitted from tube 12a and impinging on receptor 12c. Anti-scatter grid 12d remains focused on the focal spot of tube 12a, and the effective field of view does not change with angular position of the source-receptor unit. In the currently offered Selenia unit, source 12a and grid I 2d and receptor 12c rotate as a unit, also together with compression paddle 12e and breast tray 12b, so a modification is needed to achieve the geometry of FIG. 4. This modification involves decoupling a means to compress and immobilize the breast from motion of tube 12a, grid 12d and receptor 12c. For example, this can be done by removing compression paddle 12e and compressing and immobilizing the breast between compression paddles 44 that are appropriately positioned relative to the center of rotation of tube 12a but do not rotate with tube 12a. as illustrated in FIG. 4. As an alternative to rotation, one or both of tube 12a and receptor 12c can translate relative to the breast immobilized between paddles 44. In such case, focused grid 12d can be decoupled from receptor 12c and allowed to remain focused at tube 12a, or a different grid can be used that is not focused or is less focused, and/or the motion of tube 12a and/or receptor 12c can be over a more limited path. Discrete x-ray images of the breast are taken at each of a number of different positions of tube 12e relative to the breast. The image data is used for tomosynthesis through the application of known image processing methods.


An important advantage of the example of FIG. 4 is that it allows imaging at relatively large angles between the extreme rotational or translational positions of x-ray tube 12a as compared with known systems.


Yet another feature of the mammography system disclosed here is to transmit and store only a portion of the field of view. With a relatively large field-of-view receptor 12c, such as used in the Selenia system (24×29 cm), typically the image of the breast lies within a rectangle that is smaller than the field of view, as illustrated in FIG. 5, where the image 46 of a breast is within a notional rectangular outline 48 (reduced field of view) that is much smaller than the field of view 50 of receptor 12c. The area of field of view 50 that is outside the reduced filed of view area 48 may contain little or no information about the breast. To save on transmitting and storing the breast image, only the information within the reduced field of view 48 may be used, and any information outside outline 48 can be discarded. If there is any significant information outside outline 48, only that information can be attached to the information for the image portion inside outline 48.


One way to select the position and size of outline 48 is to rely on the selection of the size and position of compression paddle 12e that the health professional has made. As earlier noted, the currently offered Selenia system allows the health professional to select both the size of a paddle and, at least for some paddles, also the position of the paddle relative to receptor 12c, so as to match the size and position on receptor 12c of the breast being x-rayed. The size and position of paddle 12e can be automatically determined, and the result used to in effect crop the resulting breast image before transmitting and/or storing and/or formatting it for transmission or storage, for example according to DICOM standards. Alternatively, the size and position of the breast in the image can be found through image analysis, such as analysis involving edge detection, and the size and position of outline 48 can be found in this manner. Still alternatively, the size and position of outline 48 may be entered by the health professional, e.g., through keyboard 14a, based on viewing the image displayed on monitor 14c. Or, a combination of said methods can be used, e.g., an automatic determination based on one or both of image analysis and paddle selection, followed with a presentation of a recommended outline 48 displayed to the health professional together with the entire image, for confirmation or modification by the health professional.



FIG. 6 illustrates an arrangement for providing a reduced field of view image. A compression paddle size and position encoder incorporated in C-arm 12 or elsewhere in association with the means for mounting and moving paddle 12e provides information about the paddle 12e that the health professional has selected, and about the position of the paddle's projection on receptor 12c. A manual input provides information entered by the health professional, which can be similar to that provided by encoder 52 or can be information regarding which of several rectangles within the entire breast image encompasses the breast, or what arbitrary rectangle can encompass the breast on the image. An image analyzer 56 provides information about the area in the overall image occupied by the breast. A calculator 58 uses the information from one or more of units 52, 54 and 57 to calculate the size and position of a reduced field of view that still encompasses the breast, and the calculation is displayed at 60, e.g., as an outline 48 in an image such as illustrated in FIG. 5, for the health professional to confirm or modify, e.g. through manual entries. The result is a finalized reduced field of view image at 62 that can be used for further processing, for transmission, and/or storage. While a rectangular outline 48 has been discussed above, in fact outline 48 can have other suitable shapes.

Claims
  • 1. A system selectively operable in each of a tomosynthesis mode and a mammography mode, comprising: an x-ray tube, an x-ray imaging receptor, and a breast immobilizer, wherein (i) the x-ray tube and x-ray imaging receptor are decoupled from the breast immobilizer when the system is operating in said tomosynthesis mode but (ii) the tube, receptor and immobilizer are mounted to move as a unit between different mammography imaging positions when the system is operating in said mammography mode; andan anti-scatter grid mounted between the breast immobilizer and the x-ray imaging receptor;said anti-scatter grid remaining between the source and the receptor to suppress x-ray scatter both when the system is operating in said mammography mode and when the system is operating in said tomosynthesis mode;said system being configured to operate selectively in: (i) said tomosynthesis mode in which the x-ray source selectively emits imaging x-rays from different tomosynthesis imaging positions that are at different angles relative to the breast immobilizer, to thereby obtain a multiplicity of projection tomosynthesis images Tp related to respective ones of said different tomosynthesis imaging positions, and(ii) said mammography mode in which the x-ray source emits imaging x-rays while the x-ray source, the x-ray imaging receptor and the breast immobilizer do not move with respect to each other to thereby obtain a projection mammogram Mp related to one of said mammography imaging positions.
  • 2. The system as in claim 1 in which: said breast immobilizer comprises a breast tray and a compression paddle; andsaid compression paddle is mounted for movement along a width of the breast tray to a position matching the position of a patient's breast that is between the compression paddle and the breast tray but is not centered on the breast tray.
  • 3. The system as in claim 1 in which in which the x-ray source rotates relative to the breast immobilizer between different ones of said tomosynthesis imaging positions.
  • 4. The system as in claim 1 in which in which the imaging receptor changes angular orientation relative to the breast immobilizer as the source moves between said different tomosynthesis imaging positions.
  • 5. The system as in claim 1 in which in which the x-ray source and the imaging receptor rotate as a unit relative to the breast immobilizer between said different tomosynthesis imaging positions.
  • 6. The system as in claim 1 in which including a tissue exposure control calculator configured to receive information regarding a density of a patient's breast in said breast immobilizer derived from said imaging receptor and to use said information to calculate x-ray exposure factors for imaging said breast with said imaging x-rays.
  • 7. The system as in claim 1 in which including a tissue exposure control calculator configured to receive information regarding a thickness of a patient's breast in said breast immobilizer derived from a breast thickness encoder and to use said information to calculating x-ray exposure factors for imaging the breast with said imaging x-rays.
  • 8. The system as in claim 1 in which in which said anti-scatter grid is a two-dimensional focused grid.
  • 9. The system as in claim 1 in which in which said anti-scatter grid comprises a two-dimensional array of open cells oriented to point at a focal spot of the x-ray source.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a Rule 1.53(b) Continuation of prior application Ser. No.: 12/699,613, filed on Feb. 3, 2010, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,949,091 which in turn is a Rule 1.53(b) continuation of application Ser. No. 12/233,240, filed on Sep. 18, 2008, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,760,853 which in turn is a Rule 1.53(b) continuation of application Ser. No. 11/582,061, filed on Oct. 16, 2006, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,430,272, which in turn is a Rule 1.53(b) continuation of application Ser. No. 10/305,480, filed on Nov. 27, 2002, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,123,684.

US Referenced Citations (162)
Number Name Date Kind
3502878 Stewart Mar 1970 A
3863073 Wagner Jan 1975 A
3971950 Evans et al. Jul 1976 A
4160906 Daniels et al. Jul 1979 A
4310766 Finkenzeller et al. Jan 1982 A
4496557 Malen et al. Jan 1985 A
4513433 Weiss et al. Apr 1985 A
4559641 Caugant et al. Dec 1985 A
4706269 Reina et al. Nov 1987 A
4744099 Huettenrauch et al. May 1988 A
4773086 Fujita et al. Sep 1988 A
4773087 Plewes Sep 1988 A
4819258 Kleinman et al. Apr 1989 A
4821727 Levene et al. Apr 1989 A
4969174 Scheid et al. Nov 1990 A
4989227 Tirelli et al. Jan 1991 A
5018176 Romeas et al. May 1991 A
RE33634 Yanaki Jul 1991 E
5029193 Saffer Jul 1991 A
5051904 Griffith Sep 1991 A
5078142 Siczek et al. Jan 1992 A
5163075 Lubinsky et al. Nov 1992 A
5164976 Scheid et al. Nov 1992 A
5199056 Darrah Mar 1993 A
5240011 Assa Aug 1993 A
5289520 Pellegrino et al. Feb 1994 A
5359637 Webber Oct 1994 A
5365562 Toker Nov 1994 A
5415169 Siczek et al. May 1995 A
5426685 Pellegrino et al. Jun 1995 A
5452367 Bick et al. Sep 1995 A
5506877 Niklason et al. Apr 1996 A
5526394 Siczek et al. Jun 1996 A
5539797 Heidsieck et al. Jul 1996 A
5553111 Moore et al. Sep 1996 A
5592562 Rooks Jan 1997 A
5594769 Pellegrino et al. Jan 1997 A
5596200 Sharma et al. Jan 1997 A
5598454 Franetzki et al. Jan 1997 A
5609152 Pellegrino et al. Mar 1997 A
5627869 Andrew et al. May 1997 A
5657362 Giger et al. Aug 1997 A
5668889 Hara Sep 1997 A
5719952 Rooks Feb 1998 A
5735264 Siczek et al. Apr 1998 A
5769086 Ritchart et al. Jun 1998 A
5803912 Siczek et al. Sep 1998 A
5818898 Tsukamoto et al. Oct 1998 A
5828722 Ploetz et al. Oct 1998 A
5872828 Niklason et al. Feb 1999 A
5878104 Ploetz Mar 1999 A
5896437 Ploetz Apr 1999 A
5970118 Sokolov Oct 1999 A
5986662 Argiro et al. Nov 1999 A
5999836 Nelson et al. Dec 1999 A
6005907 Ploetz Dec 1999 A
6022325 Siczek et al. Feb 2000 A
6075879 Roehrig et al. Jun 2000 A
6091841 Rogers et al. Jul 2000 A
6137527 Abdel-Malek et al. Oct 2000 A
6141398 He et al. Oct 2000 A
6149301 Kautzer et al. Nov 2000 A
6175117 Komardin et al. Jan 2001 B1
6196715 Nambu et al. Mar 2001 B1
6216540 Nelson et al. Apr 2001 B1
6219059 Argiro Apr 2001 B1
6233473 Shepherd et al. May 2001 B1
6243441 Zur Jun 2001 B1
6256370 Yavuz Jul 2001 B1
6272207 Tang Aug 2001 B1
6289235 Webber et al. Sep 2001 B1
6292530 Yavus et al. Sep 2001 B1
6327336 Gingold et al. Dec 2001 B1
6341156 Baetz et al. Jan 2002 B1
6375352 Hewes et al. Apr 2002 B1
6411836 Patel et al. Jun 2002 B1
6415015 Nicolas et al. Jul 2002 B2
6442288 Haerer et al. Aug 2002 B1
6459925 Nields et al. Oct 2002 B1
6501819 Unger et al. Dec 2002 B2
6556655 Chichereau et al. Apr 2003 B1
6597762 Ferrant et al. Jul 2003 B1
6611575 Alyassin et al. Aug 2003 B1
6620111 Stephens et al. Sep 2003 B2
6626849 Huitema et al. Sep 2003 B2
6633674 Barnes et al. Oct 2003 B1
6638235 Miller et al. Oct 2003 B2
6647092 Eberhard et al. Nov 2003 B2
6744848 Stanton et al. Jun 2004 B2
6748044 Sabol et al. Jun 2004 B2
6751285 Eberhard et al. Jun 2004 B2
6758824 Miller et al. Jul 2004 B1
6813334 Koppe et al. Nov 2004 B2
6882700 Wang et al. Apr 2005 B2
6885724 Li et al. Apr 2005 B2
6912319 Barnes et al. Jun 2005 B1
6940943 Claus et al. Sep 2005 B2
6978040 Berestov Dec 2005 B2
6999554 Mertelmeier Feb 2006 B2
7110490 Eberhard et al. Sep 2006 B2
7110502 Tsuji Sep 2006 B2
7123684 Jing et al. Oct 2006 B2
7127091 Op De Beek et al. Oct 2006 B2
7142633 Eberhard et al. Nov 2006 B2
7245694 Jing et al. Jul 2007 B2
7315607 Ramsauer Jan 2008 B2
7319735 Defreitas et al. Jan 2008 B2
7323692 Rowlands et al. Jan 2008 B2
7430272 Jing et al. Sep 2008 B2
7443949 Defreitas et al. Oct 2008 B2
7630533 Ruth et al. Dec 2009 B2
7760853 Jing et al. Jul 2010 B2
20010038681 Stanton et al. Nov 2001 A1
20020012450 Tsujii Jan 2002 A1
20020050986 Inoue et al. May 2002 A1
20020075997 Unger et al. Jun 2002 A1
20030018272 Treado et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030072417 Kaufhold et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030073895 Nields et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030095624 Eberhard et al. May 2003 A1
20030194050 Eberhard et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030194051 Wang et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030194121 Eberhard et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030210254 Doan et al. Nov 2003 A1
20030215120 Uppaluri et al. Nov 2003 A1
20040066884 Hermann Claus et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040094167 Brady et al. May 2004 A1
20040101095 Jing et al. May 2004 A1
20040109529 Eberhard et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040171986 Tremaglio, Jr. et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040267157 Miller et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050049521 Miller et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050063509 DeFreitas et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050078797 Danielsson et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050105679 Wu et al. May 2005 A1
20050113681 DeFreitas et al. May 2005 A1
20050113715 Schwindt et al. May 2005 A1
20050129172 Mertelmeier Jun 2005 A1
20050135555 Claus et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050135664 Kaufhold et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050226375 Eberhard et al. Oct 2005 A1
20060030784 Miller et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060074288 Kelly et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060098855 Gkanatsios et al. May 2006 A1
20060129062 Nicoson et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060155209 Miller et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060291618 Eberhard et al. Dec 2006 A1
20070030949 Jing et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070036265 Jing et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070076844 Defreitas et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070223651 Wagenaar et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070225600 Weibrecht et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070242800 Jing et al. Oct 2007 A1
20080019581 Gkanatsios et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080045833 Defreitas et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080130979 Ren et al. Jun 2008 A1
20090003519 Defreitas et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090010384 Jing et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090080594 Brooks et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090080602 Brooks et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090135997 Defreitas et al. May 2009 A1
20090268865 Ren et al. Oct 2009 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (12)
Number Date Country
0775467 May 1997 EP
0982001 Mar 2000 EP
1428473 Jun 2004 EP
WO 9005485 May 1990 WO
WO 9816903 Apr 1998 WO
WO 0051484 Sep 2000 WO
WO 03020114 Mar 2003 WO
WO 2005051197 Jun 2005 WO
WO 2005110230 Nov 2005 WO
WO 2005112767 Dec 2005 WO
WO 2006055830 May 2006 WO
WO 2006058160 Jun 2006 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (18)
Entry
Kita et al., “Correspondence between different view breast X-rays using simulation of breast deformation”, Proceedings 1998 IEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recongnition, Santa Basbara, CA, Jun. 23-25, 1998, pp. 700-707.
Digital Clinical Reports, Tomosynthesis, GE Brochure 98-5493, Nov. 1998.
Mammographic Accreditation Phantom, http://www.cirsinc.com/pdfs/015cp.pdf, (2006).
Heang-Ping Chan et al., “ROC study of the effect of stereoscopic imaging on assessment of breast lesions”, Medical Physics, vol. 32, No. 4, Apr. 2005.
Cole, Elodia, et al., “The Effects of Gray Scale Image Processing on Digital Mammography Interpretation Performance”, Academic Radiology, vol. 12, No. 5, pp. 585-595, May 2005.
Federica Pediconi et al., “Color-coded automated signal intensity-curve for detection and characterization of breast lesions: Preliminary evaluation of a new software for MR-based breast imaging”, International Congress Series 1281 (2005) 1081-1086.
“Essentials for life: Senographe Essential Full-Field Digital Mammography system”, GE Health-care Brochure, MM-0132-05.06-EN-US, 2006.
Senographe 700 & 800T (GE); 2-page download on Jun. 22, 2006 from www.gehealthcare.com/inen/rad/whe/products/mswh800t.html.; Figures 1-7 on 4 sheets relateral shift compression paddle.
“Lorad Selenia” Document B-BI-SEO US/Intl (May 2006) copy right Hologic 2006.
“Filtered Back Projection,” (Nygren) published May 8, 2007; URL: http://web.archive.org/web/19991010131715/http://www.owlnet.rice.edu/˜elec539/Projects97/cult/node2.html.
Smith, A., “Fundamentals of Breast Tomosynthesis”, White Paper, Hologic Inc., WP-00007, Jun. 2008.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/396,978 of Andrew Paul Smith et al., filed Mar. 3, 2009.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/491,147 of Georgia Hitzke et al. filed Jun. 24, 2009.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/507,450 of Baorui Ren et al., filed Jul. 22, 2009.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/535,343 of Baorui Ren et al., filed Aug. 4, 2009.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/539,460 of Nikolaos A. Gkanatsioset al., filed Aug. 11, 2009.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/541,715 of Zhenxue Jing et al., filed Aug. 14, 2009.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/605,031 of Chris Ruth et al., filed Oct. 23, 2009.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20110216879 A1 Sep 2011 US
Continuations (4)
Number Date Country
Parent 12699613 Feb 2010 US
Child 13111618 US
Parent 12233240 Sep 2008 US
Child 12699613 US
Parent 11582061 Oct 2006 US
Child 12233240 US
Parent 10305480 Nov 2002 US
Child 11582061 US