The invention relates to a heat exchanger, and, more particularly, the invention relates to an evaporator for a climate control system of a motor vehicle.
Despite advances in the design of automotive heat exchangers, the pressure is still strong for continued improvements, even in the face of demands for cost reductions. For evaporators, there are multiple needs, two of which are to reduce size and mass. Accomplishing this is a real challenge, since the cooling capacity and temperature uniformity should not be substantially compromised. Some designs presently in production accomplish this through increased complexity such as a multi-tank construction, adding fins on the refrigerant side, or manifold designs that utilize various sized orifices. Other designs presently in production use two-row extruded tube and center construction. While these designs have facilitated smaller heat exchanger design, the added complexity has increased the cost of producing the heat exchanger.
The present invention provides a method for manufacturing an evaporator including the step of connecting two similar plates in a back-to-back, mirrored relationship to form a first pair of plates. The method also includes the step of connecting another two plates in a back-to-back, mirrored relationship to form a second pair of plates. The plates that form the first pair are different than the plates that form the second pair. The method also includes stacking the pairs of plates together.
The plates include apertures that are aligned when the plates are connected in pairs and stacked together. The plates also include mounds formed around various apertures. The structural cooperation between the plates, the apertures in the plates, and the mounds form pathways for directing movement of a fluid stream. The fluid stream, such as a stream of fluid to be evaporated, can be directed in alternating directions in adjacent pathways.
Other applications of the present invention will become apparent to those skilled in the art when the following description of the best mode contemplated for practicing the invention is read in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.
The description herein makes reference to the accompanying drawings wherein like reference numerals refer to like parts throughout the several views, and wherein;
Various embodiments of the invention are shown throughout the several figures. Similar structure can be defined by alternative embodiments of the invention. Similar structural elements share a common reference numeral and are differentiated with an alphabetic designation.
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
The second plates 16, 16a can be substantially similar to the first plates 12, 12a. Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
A plurality of pairs 14 and 18 of plates can be stacked together to form the evaporator 10. Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
In operation, a stream of fluid to be evaporated can be directed into inlet manifolds 66, 96 of the evaporator 10. The stream can be divided into sub-streams; each sub-stream passing from the inlet manifolds 66, 96 to cavities 24 defined between first plates 12, 12a disposed in back-to-back mirrored relationship with one another. The sub-streams can be rejoined at the return tank 54 and re-divided to move into cavities 38 defined between second plates 16, 16a disposed in back-to-back mirrored relationship with one another. The sub-streams can be rejoined in the outlet manifold 76 and the fluid stream can evacuate the evaporator 10.
The exemplary embodiment of the invention provides numerous advantages over the prior art. For example, the invention provides Improved Temperature Uniformity of Evaporator Discharge Air. Automotive evaporators operate such that they are not completely “flooded” with refrigerant. This means that somewhere toward the end of the refrigerant flow path, the refrigerant is completely evaporated. From this “dry point” to the outlet of the evaporator exists a region where the refrigerant is superheated. This superheated region of the evaporator becomes an area that that doesn't much cool the air flowing through it and thus results in a “hot spot” at air discharge face of the evaporator. Further, in recent years, automotive trend is away from Orifice Tube expansion devices toward Thermal Expansion Valves, which results in higher levels of superheat, thus aggravating the temperature uniformity issue. This invention, through it's alternating refrigerant flow arrangement, isolates these “hot spots” to a number of smaller areas instead of one bigger area, each surrounded by cold, flooded (inlet) evaporator tubes so that the resulting mixed air at the evaporator outlet is not so hot.
Furthermore, the invention provides improved Cooling Capacity. With this invention, each particle of refrigerant makes only two passes through the evaporator vs. the more typical four or more passes on conventional evaporators. This should lower the refrigerant side pressure drop. And, since in the evaporator, refrigerant exists in the 2-phase state (except for superheated region), and since, the refrigerant temperature depends directly on the refrigerant pressure in the 2-phase state, this lower pressure drop directly affects the temperature of the refrigerant and thus it's capacity to cool and dehumidify the air. To explain further, since the pressure at the outlet of the evaporator is more or less fixed by the refrigerant controls to keep the evaporator from getting too cold and “freezing up”, the lower pressure drop evaporator keeps the evaporator at a lower “mean evaporating temperature and pressure” therefore enhancing Cooling Capacity. There is another feature of this invention that similarly can enhance Cooling Capacity. Typical evaporators have identical individual refrigerant flow passages (tubes) in the evaporator. But since the refrigerant is evaporating, and thus increasing it's volumetric flow rate, as it flows through the evaporator, the ideal situation is to have an increasing area in the refrigerant flow direction—to reduce pressure drop. Since in this invention, the alternating passages can be different—one internal tube height for “inlet” tubes and another, larger, for “outlet” tubes—this feature also can reduce the refrigerant side pressure drop and enhance Cooling Capacity. Conventional evaporators accomplish this by varying the number of individual tubes in each refrigerant pass, a different technique than the feature of the invention just described.
Furthermore, the invention provides improved Noise characteristics. It is well known that if air side pressure drop can be reduced, then noise can be reduced since fan power is reduced. One way air side pressure drop can be reduced, for any given evaporator size (exterior dimensions) is to increase the proportion of the face area open to the air flow. This invention can enhance this is two ways. The first is that, the smaller return manifold mentioned above that this alternating flow idea allows, means that less of the total face area normal to the flow of the air is blocked, allowing reduction in pressure drop. The second is that since, as mentioned above, the inlet tubes can be made smaller in height than the outlet tubes this smaller tube height creates less blockage to the air flow (in this case the invention allows the choice of also reducing air side pressure drop instead of refrigerant pressure drop or in any combination that optimizes the two for any specific application).
Furthermore, the invention provides improved environmental characteristics. It has already been mentioned above that air side and refrigerant side pressure drop can be reduced with this invention. This also reduces power consumption and thus increases the efficiency of the air conditioning unit. Additionally, however, the ability to decrease the height of the refrigerant tubes can reduce the internal volume (refrigerant side volume) of the evaporator, thus allowing a modest reduction in the “charge” of refrigerant required for the vehicle air conditioning unit. This is a mass savings for the vehicle, and further, could be advantageous if the usage of refrigerant were to some day be limited due to environmental issues.
Furthermore, the exemplary embodiment of this invention is of simple construction. The tube plates can be die struck and these tube plates form the manifolds and even can form the refrigerant control orifices in the manifolds, if needed. Contrast this with the recently introduced compact evaporators that have good temperature uniformity. These have two rows of extruded tubes, separate manifolds that are not common, and even have separate orifice pieces that must be placed in the manifolds. The potential refrigerant charge reduction mentioned above is also a direct cost reduction.
While the invention has been described in connection with what is presently considered to be the most practical and preferred embodiment, it is to be understood that the invention is not to be limited to the disclosed embodiments but, on the contrary, is intended to cover various modifications and equivalent arrangements included within the spirit and scope of the appended claims, which scope is to be accorded the broadest interpretation so as to encompass all such modifications and equivalent structures as is permitted under the law.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2462421 | Pitt | Feb 1949 | A |
3808104 | Davidson | Apr 1974 | A |
3916644 | Nasser | Nov 1975 | A |
3984281 | Buchwald | Oct 1976 | A |
4002201 | Donaldson et al. | Jan 1977 | A |
4270602 | Foster et al. | Jun 1981 | A |
4572766 | Dimitriou | Feb 1986 | A |
4586565 | Hallstrom et al. | May 1986 | A |
4619242 | Smith | Oct 1986 | A |
4653581 | Yogo et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
4706741 | Bolmstedt et al. | Nov 1987 | A |
4762171 | Hallstrom et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
4821531 | Yamauchi et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
5076351 | Munekawa et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5172759 | Shimoya et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5435383 | Rajagopal | Jul 1995 | A |
5462113 | Wand | Oct 1995 | A |
5524455 | Hasegawa et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5609036 | Nagasawa et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5678419 | Sanada et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5823252 | Waitkat et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5909766 | Kobayashi et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5930894 | Oikawa et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5984000 | Nakamura et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6241011 | Nakamura et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
20020020521 | Hoshino et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020079093 | Xiaoyang | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20030070797 | Narahara et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
3147378 | Jun 1983 | DE |
1 160 530 | Dec 2001 | EP |
57140601 | Aug 1982 | JP |
9-113171 | May 1997 | JP |
10267427 | Oct 1998 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050144978 A1 | Jul 2005 | US |