Full range fuel shift determination

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6443138
  • Patent Number
    6,443,138
  • Date Filed
    Monday, July 31, 2000
    24 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, September 3, 2002
    22 years ago
Abstract
A control system for controlling the fueling of an engine assembly. The engine assembly includes an internal combustion engine, a fuel control system, a fuel vapor storage canister and a purge control system for purging the fuel vapor storage canister. The control system includes a purge fuel vapor measuring device for measuring an amount of purge fuel vapor flowing from the vapor storage canister to the internal combustion engine, a fuel corruption estimating device for estimating an amount of fuel corruption as a function of the amount of purge fuel vapor flowing from the vapor storage canister to the internal combustion engine and a controller for adapting the control of the internal combustion to the estimate of the amount of fuel corruption. A method for fueling an engine assembly having an internal combustion engine is also provided.
Description




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




1. Technical Field




The present invention relates generally to purge control systems for internal combustion engines and more particularly to a method for controlling a vapor storage canister for a purge control system of an internal combustion engine.




2. Discussion




Stricter Federal and California evaporative emission standards for automotive vehicles require that Federal Test Procedure (FTP) emission levels be measured with a loaded vapor canister. The standards require that the automotive vehicle undergo an FTP emission cycle, after which the vehicle is placed in a variable temperature shed and resting loss emissions re measured over a predetermined time period.




Under normal automotive vehicle operating conditions, fuel vapors present within the vehicle's fuel tank are temporarily stored inside a vapor storage canister. These devices are known in the art as purge canisters or vapor storage canisters. A typical vapor storage canister contains a quantity of activated charcoal as the preferred medium for storing the fuel vapors. The storage capacity of the vapor storage canister is limited by the mass and volume of charcoal after becoming saturated with absorbed fuel vapor. Therefore, it is necessary to periodically purge the vapor storage canister with fresh air to remove the fuel vapor and restore the storage potential of the canister.




Typically, a purge control system is used to purge the vapor storage canister. The purge control system includes a purge solenoid which is turned ON and OFF to control fuel vapor purged from the vapor storage canister. An example of such a purge control system is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,821,701 to Nankee II et al. Another example of a purge control system for controlling and varying the amount of purge flow from the vapor storage canister to the internal combustion engine is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,263,460 to Baxter et al.




One problem associated with the use of such purge control systems is that the amount of fuel which they deliver to the internal combustion engine during a purge cycle is not quantified. Accordingly, in situations where a substantial amount of fuel vapor is being generated (e.g., where the vehicle is operating in a relatively hot environment or where the vehicle is fueled with an oxygenated fuel), operation of the purge control system in an ON condition is likely to be frequent and provide the internal combustion engine with a relatively large supply of fuel. The delivery of fuel to the internal combustion engine via the purge control system is likely to cause erratic engine operation, particularly when the vehicle is idling and a heavy load is applied to the engine, as when actuating an air conditioning compressor.




When the engine is idling and the purge control system is turned ON, for example, the additional fuel being delivered to the internal combustion engine causes a rich burn situation wherein the ratio of fuel to air is higher than a desired stoichiometric ratio. This situation is typically detected via an oxygen sensor. In response to the detection of a rich burn situation, the engine controller typically reduces the amount of fuel that is being delivered to the internal combustion through the primary fueling means (e.g., injectors) to return the fuel-to-air ratio to the desired stoichiometric ratio. In response to the application of a heavy load to the engine, the idle speed motor opens the throttle, causing the engine to ingest relatively more air and altering the fuel-to-air ratio to create a lean bun situation and reducing the available engine torque. The lean burn situation is the result of the failure to estimate or predict the quantity of fuel that is being delivered to the engine for combustion from the purge canister and the corresponding need to retard the rate with which the injectors are permitted to change the amount of fuel that is delivered to the engine so as to avoid over reacting to variances in the amount of fuel that is being delivered from the purge canister. The speed of the engine will vary widely until a sufficient amount of time has elapsed to permit the fuel-to-air ratio to return to the desired stoichiometric ratio.




Accordingly, there remains a need in the art for a device for controlling the fueling of an engine assembly which estimates the amount of fuel that is being delivered to the engine for combustion from a purge canister. There also remains a need in the art for a method of fueling an engine that more accurately accounts for the amount of fuel that is being delivered to the engine for combustion from a purge canister.




SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




In one preferred form, the present invention provides a control system for controlling the fueling of an engine assembly. The engine assembly includes an internal combustion engine, a fuel control system, a fuel vapor storage canister and a purge control system for purging the fuel vapor storage canister. The control system includes a purge fuel vapor measuring device for measuring an amount of purge fuel vapor flowing from the vapor storage canister to the internal combustion engine, a fuel corruption estimating device for estimating an amount of fuel corruption as a function of the amount of purge fuel vapor flowing from the vapor storage canister to the internal combustion engine and a controller for adapting the control of the internal combustion to the estimate of the amount of fuel corruption. A method for fueling an engine assembly having an internal combustion engine is also provided.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS




Additional advantages and features of the present invention will become apparent from the subsequent description and the appended claims, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, wherein:





FIG. 1

is a schematic diagram of a vehicle constructed in accordance with the teachings of the present invention; and





FIG. 2

is a schematic illustration in flowchart form of the method of the present invention.











DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT




With reference to

FIG. 1

of the drawings, a vehicle constructed in accordance with the teachings of a preferred embodiment of the present invention is generally indicated by reference numeral


8


. Vehicle


8


is shown to include an engine assembly


10


having an internal combustion engine


12


and a purge control system


14


. Internal combustion engine


12


includes a fuel control system


16


for delivering a primary charge of fuel to internal combustion engine


12


for combustion. In the particular embodiment illustrated, fuel control system


16


includes a controller


18


, an oxygen sensor


20


and a plurality of fuel injectors


22


. Controller


18


includes an adaptive memory


24


and a timer


26


. Fuel injectors


22


are operable for injecting fuel into internal combustion engine


12


for subsequent combustion. Fuel injectors


22


are electronically actuated to dispense fuel into internal combustion engine, with the amount of fuel that is dispensed being proportional to the bandwidth of an electronic pulse that is operable for actuating each of the fuel injectors


22


. Oxygen sensor


20


is positioned to monitor the exhaust of internal combustion engine


12


and responsively generate an oxygen sensor signal which is employed by fuel control system


16


to determine if internal combustion engine


12


is operating at a fuel-to-air ratio which is different than a predetermined stoch ratio.




Purge control system


14


includes a fuel tank


30


connected by a conduit


32


to a purge or vapor storage canister


34


. Under normal operating conditions, fuel vapors form in fuel tank


30


and are directed through conduit


32


into vapor storage canister


34


. Purge control system


14


also includes a purge solenoid


36


connected by a conduit


38


to vapor storage canister


34


. Purge control system


14


is coupled to controller


18


which controls the flow (ON or OFF) of the purge solenoid


36


. Controller


18


may conventionally include a microprocessing unit, an input/output module, communication lines, and other hardware and software necessary to control tasks of engine control such as fuel to air ratios, fuel spark timing, or exhaust gas recirculation. When controller


18


turns purge solenoid ON, fuel vapor is purged from vapor storage canister


34


and through a conduit


50


and into a fuel actuator


52


. Fuel actuator


52


delivers a mixture of fuel and vapors through a conduit


54


to internal combustion engine


12


. It should be appreciated that purge control system


14


may include other sensors, transducers or the like in communication with controller


18


to carry out the method to be described. It should also be appreciated that unless otherwise detailed herein, purge control system


14


may be similar to that disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,821,701 to Nankee II et al. and U.S. Pat. No. 5,263,460 to Baxter et al.




Referring to

FIG. 2

, the method of the present invention is schematically illustrated in flowchart form. The method begins at bubble


100


and proceeds to decision block


104


where the methodology determines if fuel control system


16


is operating in a closed loop manner. In the particular embodiment disclosed, fuel control system


16


is operating in a closed loop manner when data from oxygen sensor is employed to tailor the amount of fuel that injectors


22


dispense to maintain the fuel-to-air ratio at the predetermined stoichiometric ratio. If fuel control system


16


is not operating in a closed loop manner (e.g., during engine start-up), the methodology proceeds to bubble


102


where the methodology terminates. If the fuel control system


16


is operating in a closed loop manner in decision block


104


, the methodology proceeds to decision block


108


.




In decision block


108


, the methodology determines if adaptive memory


24


is permitted to update. If adaptive memory is not permitted to update, as when adaptive memory


24


is running a diagnostic program or is damaged, the methodology proceeds to bubble


102


where the methodology terminates. If adaptive memory


24


is permitted to update in decision block


108


, the methodology proceeds to decision block


112


.




In decision block


112


the methodology determines if the value in timer


26


exceeds a predetermined timer value. Timer


26


is employed to limit the frequency with which the methodology of the present invention is performed so as to avoid adversely affecting the operation of internal combustion engine


12


. If the value in timer


26


does not exceed the predetermined timer value, the methodology loops back to decision block


104


. If the value in timer


26


exceeds the predetermined timer value in decision block


112


, the methodology proceeds to block


116


.




In block


116


, the methodology causes controller


18


to control purge solenoid


36


such that the flow of purge vapor from the vapor canister


34


is OFF (i.e., fuel is not being supplied to internal combustion engine


12


from vapor canister


34


for combustion).




The methodology then proceeds to block


120


where a first value which is indicative of the operation of the internal combustion engine


12


when internal combustion engine


12


is not combusting fuel from the fuel vapor storage canister


34


. In calculating the first value, controller


18


monitors the oxygen sensor signal from oxygen sensor


20


and calculates a first median oxygen filter value. Controller


18


also determines a first median fuel correction value which is equal to the median fuel correction value during the times when internal combustion engine


12


is not combusting fuel from the fuel vapor storage canister


34


. In the particular example provided, the first value is equal to the product of the first median oxygen filter value and the first median fuel correction value. Those skilled in the art will understand that the first median fuel correction value tends to vary over a period of time, taking into account various factors including engine wear and the degree to which injectors


22


are plugged. Once the first median oxygen filter and the first median fuel correction values have been determined by controller


18


, the first value is then calculated by multiplying the first median oxygen filter value by the first median fuel correction value.




The methodology next proceeds to block


124


where controller


18


is actuated to control purge solenoid


36


such that the flow of purge vapor from the vapor canister


34


is ON (i.e., fuel is being supplied to internal combustion engine


12


from vapor canister


34


for combustion). The method then proceeds to block


128


.




In block


128


, the methodology calculates a second value indicative of the operation of internal combustion engine


12


when internal combustion engine


12


is combusting fuel from the vapor storage canister


34


. In calculating the second value, controller


18


monitors the oxygen sensor signal from oxygen sensor


20


and calculates a second median oxygen filter value. Controller


18


also determines a second median fuel correction value which is equal to the median fuel correction value during the times when internal combustion engine


12


is combusting fuel from the fuel vapor storage canister


34


. Those skilled in the art will understand that like the first median fuel correction value, the second median fuel correction value tends to vary over a period of time, taking into account various factors including engine wear and the degree to which injectors


22


are plugged. Once the second median oxygen filter and the second median fuel correction values have been determined by controller


18


, the second value is then calculated by multiplying the second median oxygen filter value by the second median fuel correction value. Those skilled in the art will understand that as the amount of fuel being delivered to internal combustion engine


12


via the fuel injectors


22


is known, the step of calculating the second value is analogous to measuring an amount of purge fuel vapor flow from the fuel tank to the engine and responsively producing a purge fuel vapor flow signal (i.e., the second value).




The methodology next proceeds to block


132


where the first and second values are employed to calculate a correction term or corruption signal that estimates the magnitude of fuel corruption. In the particular example provided, the correction term is equal to the difference between the first value and the second value and provides a number between zero (0) and one (1), with a value of zero (0) indicating no fuel corruption and a value of one (1) indicating the highest level of fuel corruption. The methodology proceeds to block


136


where timer


26


is reset and controller


18


adapts the control of the engine as a function of the correction term (corruption signal). The methodology then proceeds to decision block


140


.




In decision block


140


, the methodology determines if the value in timer


26


exceeds the predetermined timer value previously mentioned in decision block


112


. If the value in timer


26


does not exceed the predetermined timer value, the methodology loops back to block


128


where the second value is recalculated based on updated or current values of the second median oxygen filter and the second median fuel correction values. If the value in timer


26


exceeds the predetermined timer value in decision block


140


, the methodology proceeds to block


144


where the timer


26


is reset. Thereafter, the methodology loops back to block


116


to permit the first value to be recalculated. Those skilled in the art will understand that other predetermined conditions, such as a fuel temperature which exceeds a predetermined fuel temperature limit, may alternatively or additionally be employed to trigger the recalculation of the first value. As those skilled in the art will understand, a fuel temperature sensor


200


(

FIG. 1

) may be employed for monitoring the temperature of the fuel that is being delivered to engine


12


for combustion and generating a fuel temperature sensor signal in response thereto.




While the invention has been described in the specification and illustrated in the drawings with reference to a preferred embodiment, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes may be made and equivalents may be substituted for elements thereof without departing from the scope of the invention as defined in the claims. In addition, many modifications may be made to adapt a particular situation or material to the teachings of the invention without departing from the essential scope thereof. Therefore, it is intended that the invention not be limited to the particular embodiment illustrated by the drawings and described in the specification as the best mode presently contemplated for carrying out this invention, but that the invention will include any embodiments falling within the description of the appended claims.



Claims
  • 1. A method for fueling an engine assembly having an internal combustion engine, a fuel control system, a fuel vapor storage canister and a purge control system for purging the fuel vapor storage canister, the method comprising the steps of:calculating a first value indicative of the operation of the internal combustion engine when the internal combustion engine is not combusting fuel from the fuel vapor storage canister; calculating a second value indicative of the operation of the internal combustion engine when the internal combustion engine is combusting fuel from the vapor storage canister; using the first and second values to calculate a correction term to account for a shift in an amount of fuel being delivered to the internal combustion when the purge control system is actuated to purge fuel from the vapor storage canister; and calculating an updated first value, the updated first value being indicative of the operation of the internal combustion engine when the internal combustion engine is not combusting fuel from the fuel vapor storage canister.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, wherein before the step of calculating the first value, the method includes the steps of:determining if the fuel control system is operating in a closed loop manner; and terminating the method if the fuel control system is not operating in a closed loop manner.
  • 3. The method of claim 1, wherein before the step of calculating the first value, the method includes the steps of:starting an purge corruption timer; and determining if a predetermined amount of time has elapsed in the purge corruption timer.
  • 4. The method of claim 1, wherein after the step of using the first and second values to calculate the correction term, the method includes the step of repeating the above two steps until the occurrence of a predetermined condition.
  • 5. The method of claim 4, wherein the predetermined condition is a timer value that exceeds a predetermined timer value.
  • 6. The method of claim 4, wherein the predetermined condition is a fuel temperature in excess of a predetermined fuel temperature limit.
  • 7. The method of claim 1, wherein the step of calculating the first value includes the steps of:terminating a supply of fuel from the vapor storage canister to the internal combustion engine; determining a first median oxygen filter value while the supply of fuel from the vapor storage canister to the internal combustion engine has been terminated; determining a purge corruption value; and calculating the first value by multiplying the first median oxygen filter value by the purge corruption value.
  • 8. The method of claim 7, wherein the step of calculating the second value includes the steps of:purging the vapor storage canister to feed fuel to the internal combustion engine; determining a second median oxygen filter value while the vapor storage canister is being purged to feed fuel to the internal combustion engine; determining a second median fuel correction value; and calculating the second value by multiplying the second median oxygen filter value and the second median fuel correction value.
  • 9. The method of claim 8, wherein the step of calculating the correction term includes the step of subtracting the second value from the first value.
  • 10. The method of claim 1, wherein a value of the correction term ranges from zero (0) to one (1).
  • 11. A method for calibrating the control of an engine of a motor vehicle having a fuel tank, including the steps of:measuring an amount of purge fuel vapor flow from the fuel tank to the engine and responsively producing a purge fuel vapor flow signal; determining an estimate of fuel corruption as a function of the purge fuel vapor flow signal and responsively producing a corruption signal; adapting the control of the engine as a function of the corruption signal; determining if a predetermined condition has occurred; and if the predetermined condition has occurred, remeasuring the amount of purge fuel vapor flow from the fuel tank to the engine and responsively producing an updated purge fuel vapor flow signal.
  • 12. The method of claim 11, wherein before the step of measuring the amount of purge fuel vapor flow; the method includes the steps of:determining if the control of the engine is fueling the engine in a closed loop manner; and terminating the method if the control of the engine is not fueling the engine in a closed loop manner.
  • 13. The method of claim 11, wherein before the step of measuring the amount of purge fuel vapor flow, the method includes the steps of:starting an purge corruption timer; and determining if a predetermined amount of time has elapsed in the purge corruption timer.
  • 14. The method of claim 13, further comprising the step of calculating an updated estimate of fuel corruption if the predetermined condition has not occurred, the updated estimate of fuel corruption being based on the purge fuel vapor flow signal and a current median filter value of an oxygen sensor signal.
  • 15. The method of claim 11, wherein the step of adapting the control of the engine includes the step of using the corruption signal to calculate a correction term to account for a shift in an amount of fuel being delivered to the engine when the purge vapor flow is greater than zero.
  • 16. A control system for controlling the fueling of an engine assembly having an internal combustion engine, a fuel control system, a fuel vapor storage canister and a purge control system for purging the fuel vapor storage canister, the control system comprising:means for measuring an amount of purge fuel vapor flowing from the vapor storage canister to the internal combustion engine; means for estimating an amount of fuel corruption as a function of the amount of purge fuel vapor flowing from the vapor storage canister to the internal combustion engine; and means for adapting the control of the internal combustion to the estimate of the amount of fuel corruption; wherein on the occurrence of a predetermined condition, the purge flow measuring means calculates an updated purge flow value, the updated purge flow value being employed by the fuel corruption measuring means to calculate an updated fuel corruption estimate.
  • 17. The control system of claim 16, wherein the means for measuring the amount of purge fuel vapor flowing from the vapor storage canister to the internal combustion engine includes an oxygen sensor.
  • 18. The control system of claim 17, wherein the means for measuring an amount of purge fuel vapor flowing from the vapor storage canister to the internal combustion engine further includes a processor for calculating a first value and a second value, the first value being indicative of the operation of the internal combustion engine when the internal combustion engine is not combusting fuel from the fuel vapor storage canister and the second value being indicative of the operation of the internal combustion engine when the internal combustion engine is combusting fuel from the vapor storage canister.
US Referenced Citations (17)
Number Name Date Kind
4703736 Atkins, Sr. Nov 1987 A
4821701 Nankee et al. Apr 1989 A
5005550 Bugin, Jr. et al. Apr 1991 A
5024687 Waller Jun 1991 A
5255661 Nankee et al. Oct 1993 A
5469832 Nemoto Nov 1995 A
5495749 Dawson et al. Mar 1996 A
5497757 Osanai Mar 1996 A
5623914 Kawamoto et al. Apr 1997 A
5651349 Dykstra et al. Jul 1997 A
5682869 Nankee, II et al. Nov 1997 A
5785033 Kawamoto et al. Jul 1998 A
5909727 Nakagawa Jun 1999 A
5988150 Osanai Nov 1999 A
6047688 Duty et al. Apr 2000 A
6085731 Duty Jul 2000 A
6095121 Osanai Aug 2000 A
Foreign Referenced Citations (2)
Number Date Country
0675278 Oct 1998 EP
14062 Jan 1997 JP