The present invention relates to fullerene derivatives useful in organic solar cells and photo detectors.
Polymeric solar cells (PSCs) and photodetectors (PDs) have attracted considerable attention in recent years due to their unique advantages of low cost, light weight, solution-based processing and potential application in flexible large area devices ((a) Yu, G.; Gao, J.; Hummelen, J. C.; Wudl, F.; Heeger, A. J., Science 27:1789, 1995; (b) Brabec, C. J.; Sariciftci, N. S.; Hummelen, J. C. Adv. Funct. Mater. 11:15, 2001; (c) Coakley, K. M.; McGehee, M. D., Chem. Mater. 16:4533, 2004; (d) Gnes, S.; Neugebauer, H.; Sariciftci, N. S., Chem. Rev. 107:1324, 2007; (e) Thompson, B. C.; Frechet, J. M. J., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 47:58, 2008; (f) Li, Y. F.; Zou, Y. P. Adv. Mater. 20:2952, 2008). Some of the most efficient PSCs and PDs are based on the bulk-heterojunction (BHJ) devices composed of a blend of a conjugated polymer electron donor component and an organic small molecule electron acceptor component. Up to 4-5% of power conversion efficiencies (PCEs) in single-layer PSC devices have been achieved by controlling the morphology of active layer in regioregular poly(3-hexylthiophene) (P3HT) and [6,6]-phenyl C61 butyric acid methyl ester (PC61BM) devices and by developing new low band-gap conjugated polymers blended with fullerene derivatives ((a) Li, G.; Shrotriya, V.; Huang, J.; Yao, Y.; Moriarty, T.; Emery, K.; Yang, Y., Nat. Mater. 4:864, 2005; (b) Peet, J.; Kim, J. Y.; Coates, N. E.; Ma, W. L.; Moses, D.; Heeger, A. J.; Bazan, G. C., Nat. Mater. 6:497, 2007; (c) Ma, W. L.; Yang, C. Y.; Gong, X.; Lee, K.; Heeger, A. J. Adv. Funct. Mater. 15:1617, 2005; (d) Wong, W. Y.; Wang, X. Z.; He, Z.; Djuri{hacek over (s)}ić, A. B.; Yip, C. T.; Cheung, K. Y.; Wang, H.; Mak, C. S. K.; Chan, W. K. Nat. Mater. 6:521, 2007). Within the BHJ film, it is critical to control the morphology of the blend to form an interpenetrating network with nano-scale phase separation between the donor and the acceptor at a distance of about 10 nm to maximize exciton dissociation and provide an effective pathway for charge transport and collection ((a) Brabec, C. J.; Sariciftci, N. S.; Hummelen, C. J., Adv. Funct. Mater. 11:15, 2001; (b) Krebs, F. C.; Jørgensen, M.; Norrman, K.; Hagemann, O.; Alstrup, J.; Nielsen, T. D.; Fyenbo, J.; Larsen, K.; Kristensen, J., Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 93:422, 2009; (c) Krebs, F. C., Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 93:394, 2009). Currently, PCBMs (including PC61BM and PC71BM) are the most widely used electron acceptor material and gave the highest PCEs with various conjugated polymers ((a) Li, G.; Shrotriya, V.; Huang, J.; Yao, Y.; Moriarty, T.; Emery, K.; Yang, Y., Nat. Mater. 4:864, 2005; (b) Peet, J.; Kim, J. Y.; Coates, N. E.; Ma, W. L.; Moses, D.; Heeger, A. J.; Bazan, G. C., Nat. Mater. 6:497, 2007; (c) Ma, W. L.; Yang, C. Y.; Gong, X.; Lee, K.; Heeger, A. J., Adv. Funct. Mater. 15:1617, 2005). However, PCBMs readily crystallize to form a large aggregation phase (>100 nm), especially on heating. This phenomenon leads to drastic decreases in device efficiency as result of inefficient charge separation and transport because the aggregation phase is much greater than the exciton diffusion length (typically around 10 nm) in the active layer. Furthermore, this also decreases the long-term operation stability of the polymer/PCBM device. In addition to PCBMs, modified PCBMs have also been used in PSCs and organic field effect transistors. However, the device performance of most of these PCBM derivatives is worse than those based on PCBMs, and these devices normally have decreased thermal stability as well.
A need exists for new fullerene derivatives having comparable or improved device efficiency compared to PCBMs and enhanced device stability compared to PCBMs.
The invention relates to amorphous fullerene derivatives and their use in organic electronic devices that include the fullerene derivative as the electron acceptor component in the device's active layer.
In one aspect, the present invention provides amorphous fullerene derivatives that are useful as the electron acceptor component in the active layer of PSCs, field-effect transistors, as well as PDs.
In another aspect, the present invention provides devices that include the fullerene derivatives as the electron acceptor component in the active layer. Representative devices include photovoltaic devices such as PSCs, solar windows, and PDs; and field-effect transistors such as PDs.
The foregoing aspects and many of the attendant advantages of this invention will become more readily appreciated as the same become better understood by reference to the following detailed description, when taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.
The present invention provides a new approach to improve the thermal stability of BHJ photovoltaics and field-effect transistors by employing a new type of amorphous fullerene derivatives as the electron acceptor component in their active layer. The amorphous fullerene derivatives of the invention are obtained by either replacing the planar phenyl ring in PCBM by a bulky electron-rich aromatic functional group or replacing both phenyl ring and butyric acid methyl ester of PCBM by the electron-rich aromatic functional groups. The electron donor properties of functional groups increase the LUMO level of fullerene derivatives, thus increasing the open-circuit voltage of photovoltaics. In addition, after introducing these functional groups, the crystallization tendency of PCBM can be suppressed. Moreover, the same electron donor functional groups can be employed as the building block to prepare the conjugated polymer electron donor component in the BHJ active layer, thus improving the compatibility between the electron donor and acceptor components. Considering the facility of chemical modification of this kind of fullerene derivatives, the invention will provide an excellent approach to develop promising electron acceptor materials for application in PSCs and PDs.
In one aspect, the present invention provides amorphous fullerene derivatives that are useful as the electron acceptor component in the active layer of photovoltaics such as PSCs, solar windows, and PDs, and field-effect transistors such as PDs.
In one embodiment, the amorphous monoadduct fullerene derivatives of the invention have one electron-rich aromatic functional group, as represented by formula (I):
wherein ring Cn is a fullerene core (Cn) or a trimetallic nitride endohedral fullerene core (M3N@Cn), D is an electron-rich moiety, and X is a nonelectron-deficient moiety. Representative electron-rich moieties include moieties having two or more conjugated phenyl rings, fused benzene rings with at least ten ring carbons, 2,3,4-trisubstitited thiophenes, thiophene oligomers with at least two repeating thiophene units, C4 heteroaryls containing Si or Se, and fused heteroaryls containing S, Si, or Se. Representative X groups include linear or branched alkyl groups having one to 20 carbons, linear or branched ether groups (-L-OR1), linear or branched ester groups (-L-CO2R1), and linear or branched amide groups (-L-CONR1R2), wherein L is an alkylene having one to 10 carbons, where R1 and R2 are independently selected from hydrogen, an alkyl group having one to 20 carbons, and an aryl group that is unsubstituted or substituted with one or more groups selected from alkyl, alkoxy, alkylamino, and alkylthio.
Representative fullerene cores include C60, C70, C76, C78, C82, C84, and C92 fullerene cores.
Representative metals (M) of the trimetallic nitride endohedral fullerene core include Ga, Sc, Ho, Tb, Gd, Dy, Tm, and Lu.
Representative donors (D) include substituted or unsubstituted triphenyl amine, substituted or unsubstituted tetraphenylbiphenyldiamine, substituted or unsubstituted carbazole, substituted or unsubstituted fluorene, substituted or unsubstituted dibenzosilole, substituted or unsubstituted dibenzothiophene, substituted or unsubstituted dibenthiophene-5,5′-doxide, substituted or unsubstituted naphthalene, and substituted or unsubstituted anthracene, 2,3,4-trisubstitued thiophene, substituted or unsubstituted thiophene oligothiophene, substituted or unsubstituted silole, substituted or unsubstituted selenophene, substituted or unsubstituted thieno[3,2-b]thiophene, substituted or unsubstituted selenolo[3,2-b]selenophene, substituted or unsubstituted cyclopentadithiophene, substituted or unsubstituted silolodithiophene, substituted or unsubstituted stannadithiophene, substituted or unsubstituted dithienopyrrole, substituted or unsubstituted benzo[1,2-b; 4,5-b′]dithiophene, substituted or unsubstituted benzo[1,2-b; 4,3-b′]dithiophene, substituted or unsubstituted phenothiazine, substituted or unsubstituted indenofluorene, substituted or unsubstituted indolocarbazole, substituted or unsubstituted 9-phenylcarbazole, substituted or unsubstituted 10-phenylacridine, substituted or unsubstituted N,N-diphenyl-4-(2-thienyl)-benzenamine.
The donor groups (D) have structures according to the following general formulas, wherein an asterisk (*) in a given structure identifies the point of attachment to the fullerene and that the atom adjacent to the asterisk is missing one hydrogen that would normally be implied by the structure in the absence of asterisk.
wherein R, R′, and R″ at each occurrence are independently selected from the group consisting of hydrogen, C1-C20 linear or branched alkyl group, C1-C20 linear or branched alkoxy group, C1-C20 linear or branched dialkylamino group, C1-C20 linear or branched alkylthio group.
The following are some examples of fullerene derivatives of the invention:
In another embodiment, the amorphous monoadduct fullerene derivatives of the invention have two electron-rich aromatic functional groups, as represented by the following structure (II):
wherein ring Cn is a fullerene core (Cn) or a trimetallic nitride endohedral fullerene core (M3N@Cn); and D1 and D2 are electron-rich moieties. Representative electron-rich moieties include moieties having two or more conjugated phenyl rings, fused benzene rings with at least 10 ring carbons; 2,3,4-trisubstitited thiophenes, thiophene oligomers with at least two repeating thiophene units; C4 heteroaryls containing Si or Se, and fused heteroaryls containing S, Si, or Se.
Representative fullerene cores include C60, C70, C76, C78, C82, C84, and C92 fullerene cores.
Representative metals (M) of the trimetallic nitride endohedral fullerene core include Ga, Sc, Ho, Tb, Gd, Dy, Tm, and Lu.
The donors, D1 and D2, at each occurrence are selected from the group consisting of substituted or unsubstituted triphenyl amine, substituted or unsubstituted tetraphenylbiphenyldiamine, substituted or unsubstituted carbazole, substituted or unsubstituted fluorene, substituted or unsubstituted dibenzosilole, substituted or unsubstituted dibenzothiophene, substituted or unsubstituted dibenthiophene-5,5′-doxide, substituted or unsubstituted naphthalene, and substituted or unsubstituted anthracene, 2,3,4-trisubstitued thiophene, substituted or unsubstituted thiophene oligothiophene, substituted or unsubstituted silole, substituted or unsubstituted selenophene, substituted or unsubstituted thieno[3,2-b]thiophene, substituted or unsubstituted selenolo[3,2-b]selenophene, substituted or unsubstituted cyclopentadithiophene, substituted or unsubstituted silolodithiophene, substituted or unsubstituted stannadithiophene, substituted or unsubstituted dithienopyrrole, substituted or unsubstituted benzo[1,2-b; 4,5-b′]dithiophene, substituted or unsubstituted benzo[1,2-b; 4,3-b′]dithiophene, substituted or unsubstituted phenothiazine, substituted or unsubstituted indenofluorene, substituted or unsubstituted indolocarbazole, substituted or unsubstituted 9-phenylcarbazole, substituted or unsubstituted 10-phenylacridine, substituted or unsubstituted N,N-diphenyl-4-(2-thienyl)-benzenamine.
The donor groups (D) have structures according to the following general formulas, wherein an asterisk (*) in a given structure identifies the point of attachment to the fullerene and that the atom adjacent to the asterisk is missing one hydrogen that would normally be implied by the structure in the absence of asterisk.
wherein R, R′, and R″ at each occurrence are independently selected from the group consisting of hydrogen, C1-C20 linear or branched alkyl group, C1-C20 linear or branched alkoxy group, C1-C20 linear or branched dialkylamino group, C1-C20 linear or branched alkylthio group.
The novel amorphous fullerene derivatives according to the present invention may be employed as the electron acceptor component in the active layer of photovoltaic devices, field-effect transistors, and photodetectors.
The following is a description of the preparation, use, and properties of two fullerene derivatives of the invention: TPA-PCBM and MF-PCBM. PCBM is also mentioned for comparison purpose.
TPA-PCBM and MF-PCBM were obtained by a two-step reaction of the keto-functionalized aromatic methyl butylate with C60. The synthetic route for the fullerenes derivatives is shown in
The electrochemical properties of TPA-PCBM and MF-PCBM were studied by cyclic voltammetry in 1,2-dichlorobenzene solution with TBAPF6 as the supporting electrolyte (shown in
Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) trace curves of PCBM, TPA-PCBM, and MF-PCBM are shown in
The electron mobility of n-type acceptor is one of the most important factors for high-performance BHJ polymer solar cells. To compare the electron-transporting properties between PCBM and TPA-/MF-PCBMs, n-channel organic field-effect transistors were fabricated. All PCBMs show typical n-type field-effect transistor behavior and the measured saturation field-effect electron mobilities of PCBM, TPA-PCBM and MF-PCBM are 1.6×10−2, 1.1×10−2, and 5.4×10−3 cm2 V−1 s−1, respectively, as shown in
The performance of the P3HT:PCBMs BHJ devices were investigated using an inverted cell structure (ITO/ZnO/C60-SAM/P3HT:PCBMs/PEDOT:PSS/Ag) ((a) Hau, S. K.; Yip, H.-L.; Ma, H.; Jen, A. K.-Y., Appl. Phys. Lett. 93:233304, 2008; (b) Hau, S. K.; Yip, H. L.; Baek, N. S.; Ma, H.; Jen, A. K.-Y., J. Mater. Chem. 18:5113, 2008; (c) Hau, S. K.; Yip, H.-L.; Baek, N. S.; Zou, J.; O'Malley, K.; Jen, A. K.-Y., Appl. Phys. Lett. 92:253301, 2008; (d) Hau, S. K.; Yip, H.-L.; Leong, K.; Jen, A. K.-Y., Org. Electron. 10:719, 2009). This inverted structure using more stable and solution-processed metal as the top electrode can provide better ambient stability and cost advantage than the conventional structure ((a) Hau, S. K.; Yip, H.-L.; Baek, N. S.; Zou, J.; O'Malley, K.; Jen, A. K.-Y., Appl. Phys. Lett. 92:253301, 2008; (b) Hau, S. K.; Yip, H.-L.; Leong, K.; Jen, A. K.-Y., Org. Electron. 10:719, 2009; (c) Krebs, F. C., Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 92:715, 2008; (d) Krebs, F. C., Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 93:465, 2009; (e) Krebs, F. C.; Thomann, Y.; Thomann, R.; Andreasen, J. W., Nanotechnology 19:424013, 2008). The optimized device performance for each P3HT/PCBMs system was achieved at a blending ratio of 1:0.7 by weight with 10-30 min annealing at 150° C.
Thermal stability of the photovoltaic devices using these acceptors were examined by annealing the BHJ films at 150° C. for a time period from 10 min to 10 hours. This is a typical temperature for the post-treatment of P3HT:PCBM system.
To understand the origin of the improved thermal stability in the amorphous PCBMs-based devices, the effect of thermal annealing on phase segregation in the BHJ films was studied.
The present invention provides fullerene derivatives and photovoltaic devices including the fullerene derivative as the electron acceptor component in the active layer.
The following examples are for illustration of the preparation of representative fullerene derivatives of the invention and are not intended to limit the scope of the invention.
Triphenylamine (5.1 g, 21 mmol) and AlCl3 (6.0 g, 45 mmol) were dissolved into dry dichloromethane (50 mL) and cooled to 0° C. The glutaric anhydride (2.8 g, 24 mmol) in dry dichloromethane (10 mL) was added slowly into the mixture solution. The mixture was stirred at room temperature for overnight and poured into ice/water, and then, extracted with dichloromethane twice. The combined organic phase was dried over anhydrous MgSO4, and the solvent was removed under vacuum. The crude triphenylamine-based acid was directed used in next step. The acid crude was dissolved into methanol solution. After adding several drops of concentration H2SO4, the methanol solution was heated to reflux for overnight. Then, the mixture was cooled to room temperature and poured into water and extracted with dichloromethane. The organic phase was washed using water for several times and dried over anhydrous MgSO4. After removing the solvent, the title compound was gotten in the yield of 30% after purifying by silica column. 1H NMR (CDCl3, ppm): 7.71 (d, J=9.3 Hz, 2H), 7.24 (m, 4H), 7.06 (m, 6H), 6.89 (d, J=9.0, 2H), 3.60 (s, 3H), 2.86 (t, 2H), 2.33 (t, 2H), 1.96 (t, 2H). 13C NMR (CDCl3, ppm): 197.91, 174.00, 173.56, 152.33, 146.66, 129.79, 126.14, 124.81, 119.89, 51.80, 37.19, 33.43, 33.23, 20.28, 19.87. HRMS (ESI) (M+, C24H23NO3): calcd, 373.1678; found, 373.1662.
The compound 1 (0.7 g, 1.9 mmol) and p-toluenesulfonyl hydrazide (0.5 g, 2.7 mmol) were dissolved into methanol with addition of several drops of concentration HCl as catalyst. Then, the mixture solution was reflux for 10 hours. After cooling to room temperature, a white precipitate was collected by filtration and washed using cool methanol twice. The methanol solution was concentrated to around 10 mL and cooled at −4° C. for overnight. The resulted white precipitate was collected by filtration and washed with cool methanol. The combined white solid was dried overnight under vacuum to give the title compound with 74% yield. 1H NMR (CDCl3, ppm): 8.99 (s, 1H), 7.91 (d, J=8.4 Hz, 2H), 7.49 (d, J=8.7 Hz, 2H), 7.27 (m, 6H), 7.10 (m, 6H), 6.90 (d, J=8.8 Hz, 2H), 3.82 (s, 3H), 2.59 (t, 2H), 2.42 (s, 3H), 2.32 (t, 2H), 1.67 (m, 2H). 13C NMR (CDCl3, ppm): 174.92, 153.78, 149.31, 147.35, 143.82, 136.24, 129.63, 129.55, 128.17, 127.32, 125.18, 123.75, 122.20, 52.59, 32.31, 25.85, 21.78, 21.22. HRMS (ESI) (M+, C31H31N3O4S): calcd, 541.2035; found, 541.2022.
To a solution of 9,9-dimethylfluorene (3.5 g, 18 mmol) and AlCl3 (2.8 g, 21 mmol) in dry dichloromethane was added glutaric acid monomethyl ester chloride (3.0 g, 18 mmol) at 0° C. The mixture was stirred at room temperature for overnight. Then, the resulted solution was poured into ice/water, and extracted with dichloromethane. The combined organic phase was dried over anhydrous MgSO4, and then the solvent was removed under vacuum. The crude product was purified by silica column to give the title compound with 42% yield. 1H NMR (CDCl3, ppm): 8.07 (s, 1H), 7.98 (dd, 1H), 7.78 (m, 2H), 7.48 (m, 1H), 7.39 (m, 2H), 3.72 (s, 3H), 3.11 (t, 2H), 2.48 (t, 2H), 2.11 (t, 2H), 1.54 (s, 6H). 13C NMR (CDCl3, ppm): 199.34, 173.98, 154.99, 154.04, 144.28, 138.05, 135.90, 128.75, 127.97, 127.41, 123.00, 122.40, 121.14, 119.98, 51.77, 47.20, 37.75, 33.37, 27.12, 19.73. HRMS (ESI) (M+, C21H22O3): calcd, 322.1569; found, 322.1558.
Compound 3 (1.3 g, 4 mmol) and p-toluenesulfonyl hydrazide (1.5 g, 8 mmol) were dissolved into methanol (15 mL) with addition of several drops of concentration HCl as catalyst. Then, the mixture solution was reflux for 10 hours. After cooling to room temperature, the mixture was poured into water and extracted with dichloromethane. The combined organic phase was dried over MgSO4. After removing the solvent, the crude product was purified by silica column to give the title compound with 71% yield. 1H NMR (CDCl3, ppm): 9.22 (s, 1H), 7.96 (d, J=8.3 Hz, 2H), 7.67-7.45 (m, 5H), 7.32 (m, 4H), 3.84 (s, 3H), 2.67 (t, 2H), 2.43 (s, 3H), 2.37 (m, 2H), 1.75 (m, 2H), 1.50 (s, 6H). 13C NMR (CDCl3, ppm): 174.99, 154.32, 154.16, 153.91, 143.93, 140.89, 138.56, 136.23, 135.32, 129.61, 128.28, 127.94, 127.27, 125.56, 122.86, 120.62, 120.53, 119.96, 52.62, 47.03, 32.29, 27.28, 26.24, 21.78, 21.24. HRMS (ESI) (M+, C28H30N2O4S): calcd, 490.1926; found, 490.1911.
Compound 3 (360 mg, 0.66 mmol) was dissolved into dry pyridine (10 mL) under nitrogen. Then, the sodium methoxide (45 mg) was added quickly under nitrogen, the solution was stirred at room temperature for 20 min. C60 (400 mg, 0.56 mmol) in dichlorobenzene (30 mL) was added in one portion. The resulted purple solution was heated to 70-80° C. and stirred for 48 hours. Then, the solution was heated to reflux and stirred for 24 hours. After cooling to room temperature, the solution was loaded into silica column and pre-eluted with chlorobenzene, then by toluene. The fraction containing TPA-PCBM was collected and concentrated. The concentration solution was poured into methanol solution to give TPA-PCBM with 35% yield. 1H NMR (CDCl3, ppm): 7.74 (d, 2H), 7.33 (t, 4H), 7.20 (m, 6H), 7.10 (t, 2H), 3.74 (s, 3H), 2.91 (t, 2H), 2.58 (t, 2H), 2.24 (m, 2H). 13C NMR (CDCl3, ppm): 173.78, 149.19, 148.16, 147.74, 147.61, 146.09, 145.40, 145.36, 145.33, 145.24, 144.99, 144.96, 144.84, 144.68, 144.59, 144.22, 143.98, 143.31, 143.22, 143.18, 143.11, 142.43, 142.31, 141.13, 140.92, 138.17, 137.84, 132.92, 129.62, 125.30, 123.68, 122.01, 80.38, 51.90, 51.69, 34.14, 33.81, 22.66. MALDI-TOF (C84H23NO2) calcd, 1077.173; found, 1077.136.
Compound 4 (230 mg, 0.47 mmol) was dissolved into dry pyridine (9 mL) under nitrogen. Then, the sodium methoxide (35 mg) was added quickly under nitrogen, the solution was stirred at room temperature for 20 min. The C60 (281 mg, 0.39 mmol) in dichlorobenzene (33 mL) was added in one portion. The resulted purple solution was heated to 70-80° C. and stirred for 48 hours. Then, the solution was heated to reflux and stirred for 24 hours. After cooling to room temperature, the solution was loaded into silica column and pre-eluted with chlorobenzene, then by toluene. The fraction containing MF-PCBM was collected and concentrated. The concentration solution was poured into methanol solution to give MF-PCBM with 33% yield. 1H NMR (CDCl3, ppm): 7.96 (s, 1H), 7.89 (m, 2H), 7.80 (d, 1H), 7.49 (d, 2H), 7.36 (m, 2H), 3.69 (s, 3H), 2.97 (t, 2H), 2.56 (t, 2H), 2.25 (m, 2H), 1.57 (s, 6H). 13C NMR (CDCl3, ppm): 173.67, 154.09, 153.75, 149.17, 148.09, 146.12, 145.38, 145.35, 145.24, 145.19, 144.99, 144.90, 144.84, 144.69, 144.64, 144.20, 143.97, 143.94, 143.19, 143.12, 142.46, 142.33, 142.30, 141.18, 140.91, 139.43, 138.83, 138.26, 137.75, 135.83, 131.27, 129.23, 127.82, 127.34, 126.79, 122.93, 120.45, 120.06, 80.31, 52.55, 51.87, 47.18, 34.13, 33.81, 27.22, 22.71. MALDI-TOF (C81H22O2) calcd, 1026.162; found, 1026.154.
The 1H and 13C NMR spectra were collected on a Bruker AV 500 spectrometer operating at 500 MHz and 125 MHz in deuterated chloroform solution with tetramethylsilane as reference.
UV-Vis spectra were studied using a Perkin-Elmer Lambda-9 spectrophotometer. Cyclic voltammetry of different fullerenes was conducted in nitrogen-saturated dichlorobenzene with 0.1 M of tetrabutylammonium hexafluorophosphate using a scan rate of 50 mV s−1. Gold micro-disc, Ag/AgCl and Pt mesh were used as working electrode, reference electrode and counter electrode, respectively. The differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) was performed using DSC2010 (TA instruments) under a heating rate of 20° C. min−1 and a nitrogen flow of 50 mL min−1 AFM images under tapping mode were taken on a Veeco multimode AFM with a Nanoscope III controller.
Organic Solar Cells. To fabricate the inverted solar cells, ITO-coated glass substrates (15Ω/□) were cleaned with detergent, de-ionized water, acetone, and isopropyl alcohol. Substrates were then treated with oxygen plasma for 5 min. A thin layer of ZnO nanoparticles (˜50 nm), synthesized using the method described by Beek et. al., was spin-coated onto ITO-coated glass (Beek, W. J. E.; Wienk, M. M.; Kemerink, M.; Yang, X.; Janssen, R. A. J. J. Phys. Chem. B. 2005, 109, 9505). The C60-SAM was then deposited on the ZnO surface using a two-step spin-coating process. First, a 1 mM solution of the molecules in tetrahydrofuran (THF)/chlorobenzene (CB) (1:1 v/v) was spin-coated on the ZnO film. To remove physically absorbed molecules, a second spin-coating using pure THF was applied. Afterward, a CB solution of P3HT (Rieke Metals) and different PCBMs (40 mg/ml) with a weight ratio of (1:0.7) was transferred and spin-coated on the ZnO modified layer to achieve a thickness of (˜200 nm) in a glove box and annealed at 150° C. for different time. After the annealing process, a PEDOT:PSS solution (50 nm) was spin-coated onto the active layer and annealed for 10 min at 120° C. A silver electrode (100 nm) was then vacuum deposited on top to complete the device structure.
The J-V characteristics of the solar cells were tested in air using a Keithley 2400 source measurement unit and an Oriel xenon lamp (450 W) coupled with an AM1.5 filter was used as the light source. The light intensity was calibrated with a calibrated standard silicon solar cell with a KG5 filter which is traced to the National Renewable Energy Laboratory and a light intensity of a 100 mW cm−2 was used in all the measurements in this study. A physical mask was used to define the device illumination area of 0.0314 cm2 to minimize photocurrent generation from the edge of the electrodes. The performance of the OPV was averaged over at least 10 devices for each processed condition. The series resistance (Rs) and shunt resistance (Rsh) were calculated from the inverse gradient of the J-V curve at 1 V and 0V, respectively.
Organic Field-Effect Transistors. Top contact organic field-effect transistors (OFETs) were fabricated on heavily n-doped silicon substrates with a 300 nm thick thermally grown SiO2 dielectric (from Montco Silicon Technologies, Inc.). Before the PCBMs deposition, the substrates were treated with HMDS by vapor phase deposition in a vacuum oven (200 mTorr, 80° C., 5 hrs). The different PCBM films were spin-coated at in a dry argon environment from a 1 wt % chloroform solution to obtain a film thickness of 50 nm. Interdigitated source and drain electrodes (W=9000 μm, L=90 μm, W/L=100) were defined by evaporating a 10 nm Ca followed by 100 nm Al film through a shadow mask from the resistively heated Mo boat at 10−6 Torr. OFET characterization was carried out in a N2-filled glovebox using an Agilent 4155B semiconductor parameter S6 analyzer. The field-effect mobility was calculated in the saturation regime from the linear fit of (Ids)1/2 vs Vgs. The threshold voltage (Vt) was estimated as the x intercept of the linear section of the plot of (Ids)1/2 vs Vgs. The sub-threshold swing was calculated by taking the inverse of the slope of Ids vs Vgs in the region of exponential current increase.
While the preferred embodiment of the invention has been illustrated and described, it will be appreciated that various changes can be made therein without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.
This application claims priority to and the benefit of co-pending U.S. provisional patent application Ser. No. 61/257,343, filed Nov. 2, 2009, which application is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
This invention was made with Government support under Grant No. DE-FG36-08-G018024/A000, awarded by the U.S. Department of Energy. The Government has certain rights in this invention.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61257343 | Nov 2009 | US |