The system and method disclosed herein generally relate to receiver testing, and more particularly relate to built-in self-testing of receiver nonlinearities.
Wireless devices rely heavily on the performance of the associated wireless receiver. Thus, testing the performance of a wireless receiver during manufacture and in the field is highly desirable. One way to evaluate the performance of the wireless receiver is by measuring the nonlinearities of the receiver, e.g., the second and third order nonlinearities, which are caused by parasitics and design errors. In fact, the second order intercept point (IP2) is one of the most important receiver test parameters. The IP2 represents the second order nonlinearity of the receiver chain, e.g., of the low-noise amplifier (LNA), the mixer, the low-pass filter (LPF), and the analog-to-digital converter (ADC). Because the IP2 is one of the most important receiver test parameters, measuring the IP2 provides a common way for operators to determine if the receiver is operating within specifications.
Measuring the IP2 requires the generation of a radio frequency (RF) test signal containing two tones at different frequencies, e.g., f1 and f2. Because of the receiver down-conversion and because of the second order nonlinearities, applying the test signal to the input of the receiver chain, e.g., the input of the LNA, results in a second order intermodulation tone (IM2) appearing at f1±f2 at the output of the receiver chain, e.g., the output of the ADC. The IP2 can then be calculated based on the amplitude of the IM2.
Conventional test systems typically generate the two-tone RF test signal using analog functions in an external signal generator system that typically includes two signal generators. Further, conventional test systems typically probe the receiver chain output off-chip. Such off-chip elements may be acceptable for manufacture testing, but generally are not convenient for in the field testing. Thus, there is a need for on-chip testing capabilities. Further, because space is limited on a receiver chip, it is desirable to minimize the footprint of any on-chip components used to test the receiver.
The built-in receiver self-test system disclosed herein provides on-chip testing with minimal footprint by reusing several receiver components to digitally generate a two-tone test signal, and to test the nonlinearities of the receiver using the generated two-tone test signal. The self-test system comprises a stimulus generator, a downconverter, and a demodulator, all of which are disposed on a common receiver chip. The stimulus generator generates a test signal comprising first and second tones at respective first and second frequencies, where the first and second frequencies are spaced by an offset frequency, and where the first frequency comprises a non-integer multiple of the offset frequency. The downcoverter operatively connects to the stimulus generator and is configured to downconvert the test signal to generate an In-phase component and a Quadrature component. The demodulator operatively connects to the downconverter and is configured to measure an amplitude of the intermodulation tone by demodulating the In-phase and Quadrature components based on a reference frequency.
A corresponding method tests a receiver to measure an intermodulation tone using a built-in self-test system, all the components of which are disposed on a receiver chip. The method comprises generating a test signal using a stimulus generator, where the test signal comprises first and second tones at respective first and second frequencies, where the first and second frequencies are spaced by an offset frequency, and where the first frequency comprises a non-integer multiple of the offset frequency. The method further comprises applying the test signal to a downconverter of the receiver configured to downconvert the test signal to generate an In-phase component and a Quadrature component, and demodulating, in a demodulator of the receiver, the In-phase and Quadrature components based on a reference frequency to measure an amplitude of the intermodulation tone.
In one embodiment, the stimulus generator comprises a first signal generator, a first divider, and a logic gate operatively connected to the output of the first signal generator and the first divider, where the first signal generator, the first divider, and the logic gate are disposed on a receiver chip. It will be appreciated that the first signal generator may reuse components already on-chip for the receiver, e.g., phase-locked loop (PLL) components. The first signal generator generates a first signal at a first frequency based on an oscillator output signal at an oscillator frequency. The first divider divides the oscillator output signal by a first divisor to generate an offset signal at an offset frequency. The logic gate switches the first signal on and off responsive to the offset signal to generate the test signal, where the test signal comprises a first tone at the first frequency and a second tone at a second frequency separated from the first frequency by the offset frequency, and where the first frequency comprises a non-integer multiple of the offset frequency.
A corresponding method generates a test signal for a built-in receiver self-test system used to measure an intermodulation tone. The method comprises generating a first signal at a first frequency based on an oscillator output signal at an oscillator frequency and dividing the oscillator output signal by a first divisor to generate an offset signal at an offset frequency. The method further comprises generating the test signal by switching the first signal on and off responsive to the offset signal, where the test signal comprises a first tone at the first frequency and a second tone at a second frequency separated from the first frequency by the offset frequency, and where the first frequency comprises a non-integer multiple of the offset frequency.
It will be appreciated that the self-test system may reuse and/or be comprised of already existing on-chip receiver components. For example, the first signal generator of the stimulus generator may reuse the receiver's phase-locked loop (PLL), while the test system's downconverter and demodulator may be comprised of the receiver's downconverter and demodulator, respectively. The built-in receiver self-test system may therefore be implemented by adding the divider and the logic gate of the stimulus generator to already existing receiver components on the receiver chip. As a result, the built-in receiver self-test system provides on-chip testing with a single signal generator with a minimal increase to the receiver chip footprint.
The built-in test system disclosed herein provides an on-chip stimulus generator to generate the two-tone test signal required to test the receiver. To prevent the desired intermodulation tone from overlapping other harmonics of the offset frequency, the first frequency of the test signal generated by the stimulus generator is a non-integer multiple of the offset frequency separating the first and second frequencies of the test signal.
Downconverter 30 and demodulator 40 may comprise any known circuits that respectively downconvert an input signal to a desired intermediate or baseband frequency using a receiver mixing frequency fmix to generate downconverted In-phase (I) and Quadrature (Q) signals, and demodulate the I and Q signals to generate the desired output signal.
During testing operations, e.g., when switch 16 connects the downconverter 30 to the stimulus generator 100, receiver 10 executes the method 200 shown in
In one exemplary embodiment, the logic circuit 120 comprises an AND gate, as shown in
As disclosed herein, the test signal frequency tones satisfy f2=f1+foffset and
If L comprises an integer, other non-linearities may introduce intermodulation tones at the same frequency (e.g., foffset=f1−f2) as the IP2 tone because the spectrum of the test signal is located on a grid comprising multiples of foffset (see, e.g.,
The solution disclosed herein addresses this problem by controlling the test signal generation such that L comprises a non-integer, e.g., L=0.5b, where b comprises an integer. The harmonics resulting from such a test signal now lie at a grid of Lfoffset=0.5 foffset+bfoffset, and therefore, do not interfere with the IM2 tone located at foffset. Thus, by selecting foffset in the bandwidth of the receiver 10, so that f1 is a non-integer multiple of foffset, the information located at foffset comprises only the desired even intermodulation tone. Filtering the output of the demodulator 40, e.g., by integrating the IM2 output tone for two periods of foffset, produces the desired IM2 tone. By coinciding the harmonics of the demodulator output signal with the zeros of the filter, the desired IM2 tone is passed, while the other harmonics are filtered out, as shown in
To achieve the desired test signal, processor 18 may be configured to control the parameters used to generate the two-tone test signal, e.g., L and M. Consider the example where f1=0.14 MHz and fosc=26 MHz. Note that f1=Lfoffset=(0.5+b)fosc/M. One solution for f1=0.14 MHz and fosc=26 MHz produces b=3 and M=650, which produces an offset frequency of 40 kHz. In this scenario, processor 18 may control L and M such that L=3.5 and M=650.
The non-integer value L may comprise the integer value of b as offset by 0.5 to maximize the distance of the IM2 tone from any other harmonic. It will be appreciated, however, that the 0.5 offset value is not required and that any fractional offset value may be used.
The solution disclosed herein provides a built-in self-test system for testing a wireless receiver that relies on a single on-chip signal generator to provide the two-tone RF test signal. By reusing many existing receiver components, the impact of the built-in self-test system on the overall footprint of the receiver chip is minimized.
The present invention may, of course, be carried out in other ways than those specifically set forth herein without departing from essential characteristics of the invention. The present embodiments are to be considered in all respects as illustrative and not restrictive, and all changes coming within the meaning and equivalency range of the appended claims are intended to be embraced therein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5524281 | Bradley et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
6980786 | Groe | Dec 2005 | B1 |
20030124999 | Parssinen et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20040105511 | Wieck | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20060068746 | Feng et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060290548 | Goyal et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20080166978 | Cheah et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080182537 | Manku et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20100027689 | Kohlmann | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100075709 | Nakano et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100081408 | Mu et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20110059709 | Collins, III | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110128992 | Maeda et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110273197 | Banerjee et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20130021048 | Peng et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130029626 | Chen et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130049780 | Collins, III et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130143501 | Huang et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130147500 | McCune, Jr. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
202010014605 | Dec 2010 | DE |
2011140563 | Nov 2011 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Ahmad, S. “Stimuli Generation Techniques for On-Chip Mixed-Signal Test.” Linköping Studies in Science and Technology, Dissertation No. 1350, Department of Electrical Engineering, 2010. |
Webster, D., et al., “How to do RF-BiST with virtually no extra circuits for RF-SoC Products?”, 53rd IEEE International Midwest Symposium on Circuits and Systems (MWSCAS), Aug. 1, 2010, pp. 469-472, IEEE, Seattle, WA. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140092946 A1 | Apr 2014 | US |