Fully-threaded bioabsorbable suture anchor

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 11324493
  • Patent Number
    11,324,493
  • Date Filed
    Friday, February 7, 2020
    4 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, May 10, 2022
    a year ago
Abstract
A suture anchor includes an anchor body having a longitudinal axis, a proximal end, and a distal end. The anchor body includes a central bore located at the proximal end and a passage extending between the central bore and the distal end. The central bore has a first dimension substantially perpendicular to the longitudinal axis, and the passage has a second dimension substantially perpendicular to the longitudinal axis less than the first dimension. The suture anchor includes a flexible strand extending through the passage, and a first knot formed in the flexible strand at the distal end has a third dimension greater than the second dimension to prevent the first knot from passing through the passage. A closed loop is positionable at least partially within the central bore and formed entirely by the flexible strand without forming any additional knots on the flexible strand extending proximally from the first knot.
Description
FIELD

The present invention relates to an apparatus and method for anchoring surgical suture to bone. More specifically, the present invention relates to arthroscopic apparatus and methods for anchoring suture to bone using a fully-threaded bioabsorbable suture anchor having a loop inserted into the suture anchor.


BACKGROUND

When soft tissue tears away from bone, reattachment becomes necessary. Various devices, including sutures alone, screws, staples, wedges, and plugs have been used in the prior art to secure soft tissue to bone. Recently, various types of threaded suture anchors have been developed for this purpose. Some threaded suture anchors are designed to be inserted into a pre-drilled hole. Other suture anchors are self-tapping.


Problems can arise if the structure for attaching the suture fails, allowing the suture to become detached from the anchor. Also, the suture often is exposed to abrasion or cutting by sharp or rough areas along the walls of the bone canal into which the anchor is inserted.


Further, the prior art suture anchors having eyelets extending from the proximal ends require countersinking of the eyelet below the bone surface to avoid having the patient's tissue abrade against the exposed eyelet. As a result, suture attached to the eyelet is vulnerable to abrasion by the bony rim of the countersunk hole into which the suture anchor is installed. In addition, in biodegradable prior art devices, the eyelet can degrade rapidly, causing the suture to become detached from the anchor prematurely.


Accordingly, a need exists for a threaded suture anchor to which suture is secured effectively so as to prevent detachment of the suture and eliminate anchor “pull back.” In addition, a need exists for suture anchors having eyelets that will not abrade tissue and do not require countersinking. Suture anchors having a small core diameter providing maximum pullout strength even in soft bone and maximum suture fixation strength are also needed.


SUMMARY

In an embodiment, a suture anchor includes an anchor body having a longitudinal axis, a proximal end, and a distal end. The anchor body includes a central bore located at the proximal end and a passage extending between the central bore and the distal end. The central bore has a first dimension substantially perpendicular to the longitudinal axis, and the passage has a second dimension substantially perpendicular to the longitudinal axis less than the first dimension. The suture anchor includes a flexible strand extending through the passage, and a first knot formed in the flexible strand at the distal end has a third dimension greater than the second dimension to prevent the first knot from passing through the passage. A closed loop positionable at least partially within the central bore of the anchor body is configured to be formed entirely by the flexible strand without forming any additional knots on portions of the flexible strand extending proximally from the first knot.


In another embodiment according to any of the previous embodiments, the closed loop is positionable completely within the anchor body.


In another embodiment according to any of the previous embodiments, the closed loop is located within the central bore of the anchor body.


In another embodiment according to any of the previous embodiments, the central bore has an opening configured to receive a driver head for driving the suture anchor.


In another embodiment according to any of the previous embodiments, at least one suture strand is configured to pass slidingly through the flexible strand.


In another embodiment according to any of the previous embodiments, the anchor body is threaded from the proximal end to the distal end.


In another embodiment according to any of the previous embodiments, the anchor body comprises a bioabsorbable material.


In another embodiment according to any of the previous embodiments, the flexible strand includes a suture formed of ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene.


In another embodiment according to any of the previous embodiments, the first knot is coated with a glue material.


In another embodiment according to any of the previous embodiments, a distal surface of the central bore is substantially perpendicular to the longitudinal axis of the suture anchor.


In another embodiment according to any of the previous embodiments, the anchor body is a single, integral, monolithic component.


In another exemplary embodiment, a suture anchor assembly for attachment of tissue to bone includes a suture anchor including an anchor body having a distal end, a proximal end, a longitudinal axis, an outer surface, a central bore located at the proximal end, and a passage extending between the central bore and the distal end. The central bore has a first dimension substantially perpendicular to the longitudinal axis, and the passage has a second dimension substantially perpendicular to the longitudinal axis that is less than the first dimension. The suture anchor assembly also includes a first flexible strand that extends through the passage of the anchor body, and a first knot formed in the first flexible strand at the distal end of the anchor body has a third dimension greater than the second dimension to prevent the first knot from passing through the passage. A closed loop positionable at least partially within the central bore of the anchor body is configured to be formed entirely by the first flexible strand without forming any additional knots on portions of the first flexible strand extending proximally from the first knot. The suture anchor assembly also includes at least a second flexible strand attached to the suture anchor and configured to pass slidingly through the first flexible strand.


In another embodiment according to any of the previous embodiments, the closed loop is configured to be recessed from the proximal end of the anchor body by about one third the length of the anchor body.


In another embodiment according to any of the previous embodiments, the anchor body comprises a plurality of thread flights extending from the outer surface of the anchor body.


In another embodiment according to any of the previous embodiments, the anchor body has an outside diameter of about 5.5 mm.


In another exemplary embodiment, a method attaches a suture anchor assembly to a driver. The suture anchor assembly is configured to approximate tissue to bone and includes a suture anchor. The suture anchor includes an anchor body having a distal end, a proximal end, a longitudinal axis, a central bore located at the proximal end, and a passage extending between the central bore and the distal end. The central bore has a first dimension substantially perpendicular to the longitudinal axis, and the passage has a second dimension substantially perpendicular to the longitudinal axis that is less than the first dimension. The suture anchor assembly includes a first flexible strand that extends through the passage of the anchor body, and a first knot formed in the first flexible strand at the distal end of the anchor body has a third dimension greater than the second dimension to prevent the first knot from passing through the passage. A closed loop positionable at least partially within the central bore of the anchor body is configured to be formed entirely by the first flexible strand without forming any additional knots on portions of the first flexible strand extending proximally from the first knot. The suture anchor assembly includes at least a second flexible strand attached to the suture anchor and configured to pass slidingly through the first flexible strand. The method includes the steps of coupling the suture anchor assembly to the driver and threading ends of the second flexible strand through a cannula of the driver.


In another embodiment according to any of the previous embodiments, the second flexible strand further comprises a needle attached to one end.


In another embodiment according to any of the previous embodiments, comprising the step of securing the needle within a cavity of a handle of the driver.


Other features and advantages of the present invention will become apparent from the following description of the invention, which refers to the accompanying drawings.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 is a cross-sectional view of a fully-threaded suture anchor according to the present invention, and with two suture strands looped through the internal loop of the fully-threaded suture anchor.



FIG. 2 is a perspective view of the fully-threaded suture anchor of FIG. 1, but without the two suture strands looped through the internal loop of the fully-threaded suture anchor shown in FIG. 1.



FIG. 3 is a proximal end view of the fully-threaded suture anchor of FIG. 2.



FIG. 4 is a cross-sectional view of the fully-threaded suture anchor of FIG. 2.



FIG. 5 is a distal end view of the fully-threaded suture anchor of FIG. 2.



FIG. 6 is another perspective view of the fully-threaded suture anchor of FIG. 2.



FIG. 7(a) is a perspective view of a first exemplary embodiment of a cannulated driver preloaded with the fully-threaded suture anchor of FIGS. 1-6.



FIG. 7(b) is an enlarged view of the fully-threaded suture anchor of FIG. 7(a).



FIG. 8(a) is a perspective view of a second exemplary embodiment of a driver preloaded with the fully-threaded suture anchor of the present invention, and with needles attached to the two suture strands looped through the internal loop of the fully-threaded suture anchor.



FIG. 8(b) is an enlarged view of the needles attached to the fully-threaded suture anchor of FIG. 8(a).



FIG. 9(a) is a perspective view of a third exemplary embodiment of a driver preloaded with the fully-threaded suture anchor of the present invention, and with punch needles attached to the two suture strands looped through the internal loop of the fully-threaded suture anchor.



FIG. 9(b) is an enlarged view of the fully-threaded suture anchor of FIG. 9(a).



FIG. 10 is a perspective view of the cannulated driver shown in FIG. 7(a).



FIG. 11 is another perspective view of the cannulated driver of FIG. 10.



FIG. 12 is a side view of the cannulated driver of FIG. 11.



FIG. 13 is a cross-sectional view of the handle of the cannulated driver of FIG. 10.



FIG. 14 is a side view of the handle of the cannulated driver of FIG. 10.



FIG. 15 is a top view of the handle of the cannulated driver of FIG. 10.



FIG. 16 is a top view of the driver shown in FIG. 8(a).



FIG. 17 is a perspective view of the driver shown in FIG. 16.



FIG. 18 is a side view of the shaft and head of the driver shown in FIG. 16.



FIG. 19 is a top view of the shaft and head shown in FIG. 18.



FIG. 20 is a top view of the handle of the driver of FIG. 16, with the cover removed.



FIG. 21 is a proximal end view of the handle shown in FIG. 20.



FIG. 22 is a partial cross-sectional side view of the driver of FIG. 20.



FIG. 23 illustrates a schematic view of the fully-threaded suture anchor of FIG. 1, having a recessed loop, and with two suture strands looped through the internal loop of the fully-threaded suture anchor.



FIG. 24 illustrates a top view of the cannulated driver of FIGS. 10-15 loaded with the fully-threaded suture anchor of FIG. 23, and with the two suture strands threaded through the cannula of the driver.



FIG. 25 illustrates a top view of the cannulated driver of FIGS. 10-15 loaded with the fully-threaded suture anchor of FIG. 23, and showing the loading path of the two suture strands threaded through the cannula of the driver.



FIG. 26 illustrates a side view of the cannulated driver of FIGS. 10-15 loaded with the fully-threaded suture anchor of FIG. 23, and showing the two suture strands threaded through the cannula of the driver and secured to the driver.



FIG. 27 illustrates a side view of the driver shown in FIGS. 16-22 before being loaded with the fully-threaded suture anchor having two suture strands with attached needles.



FIG. 28 illustrates a schematic view of the fully-threaded suture anchor of FIG. 1, having a recessed suture loop and two suture strands looped through the loop of the fully-threaded suture anchor, the two suture strands having attached needles.



FIG. 29 illustrates a perspective view of the driver of FIG. 27 loaded with the fully-threaded suture anchor of FIG. 28, and with the two suture strands with attached needles partially threaded through a side cannulation of the driver.



FIG. 30 illustrates another perspective view of the driver of FIG. 27 loaded with the fully-threaded suture anchor of FIG. 28 and with the two suture strands and attached needles secured to the driver.



FIG. 31 is a perspective view of a punch employed to create a pilot hole for the fully-threaded suture anchor of the present invention.



FIG. 32 is a distal end view of the punch of FIG. 31.



FIG. 33 is a schematic cross-sectional view of a bone fragment undergoing a suture anchor installation in accordance with a method of the present invention and at an initial stage.



FIG. 34 illustrates the bone fragment of FIG. 33 at a stage of suture anchor installation subsequent to that shown in FIG. 33.



FIG. 35 illustrates the bone fragment of FIG. 33 at a stage of suture anchor installation subsequent to that shown in FIG. 34.



FIG. 36 illustrates the bone fragment of FIG. 33 at a stage of suture anchor installation subsequent to that shown in FIG. 35.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Referring now to the drawings, where like elements are designated by like reference numerals, FIGS. 1-6 illustrate a fully-threaded bioabsorbable suture anchor 100 of the present invention. The fully-threaded suture anchor 100 includes a body 4 provided in the shape of a tapered cylinder and having a distal end 12 and a proximal end 13.


As shown in FIG. 1, the fully-threaded suture anchor 100 is provided with a continuous thread 6 which wraps around the body 4 in a clockwise direction, the crest of the threads tapering from wide to narrow from the proximal to the distal end of the anchor. The proximal threads of anchor 100 with the widest crest surfaces are designed to engage the thin cortical shell in osteopenic bone to prevent anchor “pull back,” which could cause the back of the anchor to be proud to the bone. In an exemplary embodiment, suture anchor 100 is provided with about eight thread flights wrapping around body 4, with the angle of the proximal surface of each thread being approximately between one-third and one-fourth the angle of the distal surface of each thread relative to the horizontal. For example, in the preferred embodiment, the proximal surface of each thread has an angle of 12° relative to a plane horizontal to the axis of the suture anchor, while the distal surface of each thread has an angle of 45° relative to the same horizontal plane.


By providing the suture anchor 100 with continuous threads running from the tip to the proximal end where the driver engages, the thread potential is maximized and the wasted space is minimized. The fully-threaded design of the anchor of the present invention substantially improves pull-out strength compared to suture anchors with protruding eyelets, and prevents anchor “pull-back” that can occur with countersunk anchors.


As shown in FIGS. 1 and 4, the suture anchor 100 has a cylindrically shaped bore or socket 10 starting from a rectangularly shaped opening 11 at the proximal end and extending into the anchor body 4 approximately two-thirds of the length therethrough. Distally of the bore 10, anchor body is provided with a knot socket 20 which extends from the distal end 12 of the anchor. Knot socket 20 may have various shapes and configurations, for example, a cylindrical shape, as shown in FIG. 5. Bore 10 communicates with knot socket 20 through passage 40.


The proximal surface and associated edges of suture anchor 100 defining the rectangularly shaped opening 11 is rounded and smooth. Preferably, the proximal surface of the suture anchor 100 forming the periphery of the opening 11 forms a rounded lip 18 (FIG. 4) so that opening 11 has a slightly wider diameter than the main portion of the cylindrical bore 10. With the smooth and rounded proximal end provided in the anchor of the present invention, sutures threaded through the bore 10 and opening 11 will not be abraded by any sharp edges, and will not become frayed upon pressure or rubbing against the anchor at the proximal opening.


In a preferred embodiment, diameter Ø2 (FIG. 4) of opening 11 is substantially equal to that of the knot socket 20, but larger than diameter Ø3 of the passage 40 and smaller than outside diameter Ø1 of the anchor body 4. Preferably, the outside diameter Ø1 of the anchor body 4 is about 3 to about 8 mm, more preferably of about 5.5 mm, and the diameter Ø2 of the opening 11 and socket 20 of about 1.5 to about 4.5 mm, more preferably of about 3 mm. In an exemplary embodiment, body 4 of suture anchor 100 has a length of about 0.6 in. and an exterior diameter of about 0.22 in. (5.5 mm) as measured across the outer diameter of the threading at the proximal end of the anchor.


Referring back to FIG. 1, a flexible strand 30, preferably suture, is threaded into the anchor body 4, with one end of the suture strand being threaded through the socket 20, passage 40 and bore 10 to form a loop or eyelet 32 located at least partially within bore 10 at the proximal end 13 of the anchor 100. Ends 31a, 31b extending through the anchor from the distal end 12 of the suture anchor are tied to form at least one knot 34.


In the preferred embodiment illustrated in FIG. 1, the loop 32 is completely recessed from the proximal end 13 of the anchor body 4. However, the invention also contemplates embodiments according to which the loop 32 extends out of the suture anchor 100 by a distance of about 0.5 to about 1.5 mm, more preferably of about 1 mm. In alternative configurations, the loop 32 may be also located completely outside of the bore 10 of the anchor 100. Thus, although the embodiment of FIG. 1 illustrates eyelet 32 disposed completely within the anchor body 4, this embodiment is only illustrative and the invention is not limited to it. The position and size of the eyelet of the present invention is determined according to the characteristics of the arthroscopic procedure, and the need to precisely orientate the eyelet during anchor insertion to optimize suture sliding characteristics.


The fully-recessed loop 32 of FIG. 1 has the ability to self-align, eliminating the need to determine eyelet alignment as it applies to the orientation of the tissue edge. The fully-recessed loop 32 also enhances suture slidability compared to conventional anchors with protruding eyelets, and allows the suture to slide against the smooth inner edge of the anchor reducing the potential for suture abrasion from the cortical bone edge.


At the distal end 12 of anchor 100, flexible strand of material 30 forms at least one knot 34, which is preferably an over-hand knot. Knot 34 is housed in the knot socket 20 and rests on most distal surfaces 37 of regions 35 of the anchor body 4 that define the passage 40 having a diameter narrower than that of the sockets 10 and 20. To increase the pull out strength of the strand 30 from the anchor, knot 34 may be optionally coated with a glue material to increase its strength and facilitate adherence to the walls of the socket 20. Knot 34 increases the pullout strength of the strand even in soft bone, provides increased fixation, and eliminates the anchor “pull back.”


The strand 30 may be formed of any flexible material. In the preferred embodiment, strand 30 and loop 32 are formed of a high strength suture material such as the one described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,716,234 to Grafton et al., the disclosure of which is incorporated by reference in its entirety. In additional embodiments, the strand 30 may be insert-molded into the anchor in the manner described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,964,783 to Grafton et al., the disclosure of which is also incorporated by reference in its entirety.


The anchor body 4 is preferably formed of a translucent or transparent polymer material, and is preferably made of bioabsorbable materials such as polyglycolic or polylactic acid polymers. Accordingly, flexible strand 30 is visible through the body of the fully-threaded anchor 100 to provide visual confirmation of strand encapsulation within the anchor. Advantageously, the flexible strand of material 30 and the anchor body 4 are made of materials selected such that the loop 32 will not biodegrade before anchor body 4. As used in the present application, the term “bioabsorbable” is considered to be interchangeable with the term “biodegradable,” “resorbable,” and “absorbable” to mean that the device can be absorbed by the body over time. Also, the measurements, angles and ratios between the dimensions of the suture anchor may be varied from those described above so as to be suitable for the conditions and applications in which the suture anchor is to be used.


Optionally, the suture anchor can be distributed with at least one strand of suture already threaded through the loop 32. For example, FIG. 1 illustrates suture strands 42, 44 attached to the loop allowing the sutures to slide smoothly with minimal friction. In an exemplary embodiment, the suture strands 42, 44 may be FiberWire composite sutures of alternating colors to maximize repair strength, aid in suture management and provide superior tying characteristics.



FIGS. 7(a), 8(a) and 9(a) illustrate various embodiments of drivers 200, 300, 400 used to install the fully-threaded suture anchor 100 of the present invention. FIG. 7(a) illustrates cannulated driver 200 preloaded with the fully-threaded suture anchor of FIGS. 1-6 and with suture strands 42, 44 attached to the loop 32. As explained in more detail below with reference to FIGS. 10-15 and 23-26, suture strands 42, 44 are threaded through the cannula of the driver 200 and secured on a hook on the handle of the driver, to allow the distal end of the head of the driver to be inserted into the opening 11 and bore 10 of the anchor 100 so that the suture anchor is driven into a pilot hole.



FIG. 8(a) illustrates a second embodiment of a driver of the present invention. Driver 300 (which will be described in more detail in FIGS. 16-22) is not cannulated, but rather presented with a slot or side cannulation 360 in the shaft 330. The slot allows suture strands that are provided with needles 380 (FIG. 8(b)) and that are attached to the loop 32 of the anchor 100 to pass through the slot and around the sides of handle 310, to be further secured in needle slot 388 of the handle.



FIG. 9(a) illustrates yet another embodiment of a driver of the present invention, according to which driver 400 is employed in connection with suture strands with punch needles 440 (FIG. 9(b)) that are attached to the loop 32 of the anchor 100 of the present invention.



FIGS. 10-15 illustrate details of the first exemplary embodiment of driver 200 used to install the fully-threaded suture anchor 100 of the present invention during an arthroscopic procedure. The driver 200 is provided with a head 250, a shaft 230 and a handle assembly 210. The head 250 of the driver is configured to be received within anchor socket 10 of the fully-threaded suture anchor 100 of FIGS. 1-6. In an exemplary embodiment, the drive head is rectangularly shaped and has a width and a length which substantially corresponds to the width and length of opening 11 in suture anchor 100. Preferably, the drive head is slightly shorter and has a slightly smaller width than opening 11, so that the fit is not too tight, yet ensures secure engagement for driving the suture anchor into bone.


The shaft 230 preferably comprises an elongate, narrow diameter body suitable for use in remote procedures performed through percutaneous tissue punctures, such as arthroscopic, laparoscopic and other invasive procedures and the like. The shaft typically has a length of about 5 cm to about 20 cm, preferably about 15 cm. The diameter of the shaft assembly is sufficiently small to facilitate introduction through access sheaths, cannulas, trocars, and the like, typically being less than about 10 mm, preferably about 5 mm.


The handle assembly 210 preferably includes an elongated double hook 252 extending substantially along the length thereof and having a hook at the proximal end and at the distal end thereof, and a clip 260 formed at one end region of the double hook 252. As explained in more detail below with reference to FIGS. 23-26, when driver 200 is engaged with suture anchor 100, excess lengths of suture 42, 44 passed through the proximal end of driver 200 can be wrapped around the double hook 252, and the ends of the sutures can be secured in the clip 260. In this manner, the suture strands 42, 44 can be prevented from becoming tangled or otherwise interfering with the surgeon's work.


Driver 200 is preferably constructed to withstand an application of about 20 in/lb of torque. Preferably, although not necessarily, at least the shaft and drive head are made of stainless steel. However, other materials may be used which provide the necessary strength and rigidity for installing the suture anchor of the present invention into cortical bone.


The anchor 100 and driver 200 may be provided to the surgeon as a preformed assembly with the sutures 32, 34 pre-threaded through loop 32 and through the cannula of the driver and secured on the handle.



FIGS. 16-22 illustrate details of the second exemplary embodiment of driver 300 used to install the fully-threaded suture anchor 100 of the present invention during an arthroscopic procedure, preferably during an open procedure such as mini-open rotator cuff repairs. The driver 300 is different from the driver 200 described above in that driver 300 allows installation of a fully-threaded suture anchor that has attached at least one strand of suture with a surgical needle. Thus, driver 300 is not cannulated but rather comprises a slot or side cannulation 360 provided for about half the length of the shaft 330 and defined by break edges 350. The side cannulation allows suture strands 342, 344 (FIG. 8(b)), which are received in the cannulation, to be provided with surgical needles 380 (FIG. 8(b)) at one end, which would not be possible if the driver had a central (fully closed) cannulation.


When driver 300 is engaged with suture anchor 100, excess lengths of suture 342, 344 with attached needles 380 can be secured in recess region or cavity 388 (FIG. 8(b)) of the handle 310. The cavity 388 is accessed by opening a pivotable hatch 399. In this manner, the needles 380 and suture strands 342, 344 are wrapped around tie-down bars disposed in the inside of the housing cavity when the hatch is closed. Thus, surgical needles 380 may be safely stored within the handle 310, preventing therefore any piercing of surgical gloves and any problems in maintaining the needles sterile.



FIGS. 20-23 illustrate details of the housing cavity 388 provided in the handle 310 of the driver 300. As shown in FIG. 20, cavity 388 is provided with a plurality of slots 396 and tie-down bars 393, that allow the surgical needles 380 to be “parked” or secured within the slots and the bars. If desired, a plurality of sutures with or without needles may be housed within the housing cavity 388. The cavity 388 is accessed by opening the pivotable hatch 399. Driver 300 is also configured to be received within anchor opening 11 of the fully-threaded suture anchor 100 of FIGS. 1-6.



FIGS. 23-26 illustrate the cannulated driver of FIGS. 10-15 loaded with the fully-threaded suture anchor of FIG. 23. As shown in FIG. 24, the two suture strands 42, 44 are first threaded through the cannula of the driver 200, and the distal end of the drive head 250 (FIG. 24) of the driver is then inserted into the opening 11 of the anchor 100. The sutures exiting the proximal end of driver 200 are wrapped around the double hook 252 and/or clipped in clip 260.



FIGS. 27-30 illustrate the driver 300 of FIGS. 16-22 loaded with the fully-threaded suture anchor 100 and provided with two suture strands 342, 344 having attached surgical needles 380. As shown in FIG. 29, the two suture strands 342, 344 are first passed through side cannulation 360 of the shaft of the driver 300, so that the distal end of the drive head 350 of the driver is then inserted into the opening 11 of the anchor 100. The sutures passed through the side cannulation are pulled toward the proximal end of the driver 300 and the suture strands 342, 344 are wrapped around the tie-down bars 393 in the housing cavity 388, while the needles 380 are stored within slots 396.


Sutures anchors according to the present invention can be used for arthroscopic procedures. The anchors are also advantageous for open and mini-open surgical procedures. Specific examples of applicable procedures include cortical bone-soft tissue fixation, Bankart and SLAP shoulder repairs.


An exemplary method of employing the suture anchors of the present invention is described below with reference to FIGS. 33-36. FIG. 33 illustrates a schematic cross-sectional view of bone segment 900 which undergoes suture anchor installation according to the present invention. A punch 910 (FIG. 33) either alone or in combination with tap 500 (FIG. 34) may be employed for forming a hole in bone 900 into which suture anchor 100 is to be inserted. If bone 900 is soft bone, punch 910 may be sufficient for drilling the hole. If, however, the bone is hard cortical bone, the punch/tap combination may be desirable. Preferably, the diameter of the hole formed is slightly (e.g. 1 mm) smaller than the diameter of the suture anchor to be installed, to ensure good purchase of the suture anchor threads in the bone. Alternatively, a self-drilling/self-tapping suture anchor can be formed and inserted directly into bone by engaging the anchor with a driver and turning the anchor to advance the anchor directly into bone without previous formation of a hole.



FIGS. 31 and 32 illustrate an embodiment of tap 500 employed to prepare a bone socket or pilot hole prior to insertion of the anchor. As shown in FIGS. 31 and 32, tap 500 includes a shaft 502 having a handle 504 on a proximal end and a tapping head 506 on a distal end. Tapping head 506 includes a trocar tip 508 followed by a tapered, spiral cutting section 505. Using tap 500, a hole for the suture anchor is formed to accommodate a head of a cannulated driver used to install the suture anchor.


Reference is now made to FIGS. 35 and 36. Driver 200 loaded with the fully-threaded suture anchor of the present invention (shown in FIG. 26, for example) is then placed at the opening of the prepared hole in bone 900, and the driver 200 is rotated until the proximal surface of the anchor 100 is flush with the surface of the bone. The driver tip is then pulled back, to reveal the suture strands 42, 44 (FIG. 36). Since it is not necessary for the proximal end of the anchor to be countersunk below the bone surface to prevent tissue abrasion, the inventive anchor does not need to be inserted as far as prior art devices, and avoids abrasion of the sutures by the rim of the bone around the installed suture anchor.


The suture anchor of the present invention provides advantages in addition to those already discussed above. For example, with the threads provided along the entire length of the suture anchor body, the anchor is afforded maximum securement by the threads in the cortical bone, unlike some prior art anchors in which the threads only contact the cancellous bone. Also, by providing a knot which is optionally coated with a glue material, the suture anchor is installed with a higher torque than many prior art anchors, and thus has improved fixation strength.


Although the present invention has been described in relation to particular embodiments thereof, many other variations and modifications and other uses will become apparent to those skilled in the art.

Claims
  • 1. A suture anchor comprising: an anchor body having a longitudinal axis, a proximal end, and a distal end, wherein the anchor body includes a central bore located at the proximal end and a passage extending between the central bore and the distal end, wherein the central bore has a first dimension substantially perpendicular to the longitudinal axis, and the passage has a second dimension substantially perpendicular to the longitudinal axis that is less than the first dimension; anda flexible strand that extends through the passage of the anchor body, wherein a first knot formed in the flexible strand at the distal end of the anchor body has a third dimension greater than the second dimension to prevent the first knot from passing through the passage;wherein a closed loop positionable at least partially within the central bore of the anchor body is configured to be formed entirely by the flexible strand without forming any additional knots on portions of the flexible strand extending proximally from the first knot.
  • 2. The suture anchor of claim 1, wherein the closed loop is positionable completely within the anchor body.
  • 3. The suture anchor of claim 1, wherein the closed loop is located within the central bore of the anchor body.
  • 4. The suture anchor of claim 1, wherein the central bore has an opening configured to receive a driver head for driving the suture anchor.
  • 5. The suture anchor of claim 1, further comprising at least one suture strand configured to pass slidingly through the flexible strand.
  • 6. The suture anchor of claim 1, wherein the anchor body is threaded from the proximal end to the distal end.
  • 7. The suture anchor of claim 1, wherein the anchor body comprises bioabsorbable material.
  • 8. The suture anchor of claim 1, wherein the flexible strand comprises a suture formed of ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene.
  • 9. The suture anchor of claim 1, wherein the first knot is coated with a glue material.
  • 10. The suture anchor of claim 1, wherein a distal surface of the central bore is substantially perpendicular to the longitudinal axis of the suture anchor.
  • 11. The suture anchor of claim 1, wherein the anchor body is a single, integral, monolithic component.
  • 12. A suture anchor assembly for attachment of tissue to bone, the suture anchor assembly comprising: a suture anchor comprising an anchor body having a distal end, a proximal end, a longitudinal axis, an outer surface, a central bore located at the proximal end, and a passage extending between the central bore and the distal end, wherein the central bore has a first dimension substantially perpendicular to the longitudinal axis, and the passage has a second dimension substantially perpendicular to the longitudinal axis that is less than the first dimension;a first flexible strand that extends through the passage of the anchor body, wherein a first knot formed in the first flexible strand at the distal end of the anchor body has a third dimension greater than the second dimension to prevent the first knot from passing through the passage, and wherein a closed loop positionable at least partially within the central bore of the anchor body is configured to be formed entirely by the first flexible strand without forming any additional knots on portions of the first flexible strand extending proximally from the first knot; andat least a second flexible strand attached to the suture anchor and configured to pass slidingly through the first flexible strand.
  • 13. The suture anchor assembly of claim 12, wherein the closed loop is configured to be recessed from the proximal end of the anchor body by about one third the length of the anchor body.
  • 14. The suture anchor assembly of claim 12, wherein the anchor body comprises a plurality of thread flights extending from the outer surface of the anchor body.
  • 15. The suture anchor assembly of claim 12, wherein the anchor body has an outside diameter of about 5.5 mm.
  • 16. A method of attaching a suture anchor assembly to a driver, the suture anchor assembly configured to approximate tissue to bone and comprising a suture anchor comprising: an anchor body having a distal end, a proximal end, a longitudinal axis, a central bore located at the proximal end, and a passage extending between the central bore and the distal end, wherein the central bore has a first dimension substantially perpendicular to the longitudinal axis, and the passage has a second dimension substantially perpendicular to the longitudinal axis that is less than the first dimension;a first flexible strand that extends through the passage of the anchor body, wherein a first knot formed in the first flexible strand at the distal end of the anchor body has a third dimension greater than the second dimension to prevent the first knot from passing through the passage, and wherein a closed loop positionable at least partially within the central bore of the anchor body is configured to be formed entirely by the first flexible strand without forming any additional knots on portions of the first flexible strand extending proximally from the first knot; andat least a second flexible strand attached to the suture anchor and configured to pass slidingly through the first flexible strand;the method comprising the steps of:coupling the suture anchor assembly to the driver; andthreading ends of the second flexible strand through a cannula of the driver.
  • 17. The method of claim 16, wherein the second flexible strand further comprises a needle attached to one end.
  • 18. The method of claim 17, further comprising the step of securing the needle within a cavity of a handle of the driver.
REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION

This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/382,855 filed on Dec. 19, 2016, now U.S. Pat. No. 10,595,847 granted Mar. 24, 2020, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/224,060 filed on Sep. 13, 2005, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,521,999 granted Dec. 20, 2016.

US Referenced Citations (524)
Number Name Date Kind
74489 Bidwell Feb 1868 A
85794 Crosby Jan 1869 A
176335 Morton Apr 1876 A
463650 Stevens Nov 1891 A
1379606 Ashley May 1921 A
1574578 Holmes Feb 1926 A
1610309 Niederer Dec 1926 A
1925174 Creamean Sep 1933 A
2045903 Fortin Jun 1936 A
2121193 Hanicke Jun 1938 A
2243717 Moreira May 1941 A
2329398 Duffy Sep 1943 A
2381050 Hardinge Aug 1945 A
2397216 Stellin Mar 1946 A
2490364 Livingston Feb 1948 A
2472103 Giesen Jun 1949 A
2489870 Dzus Nov 1949 A
2562419 Ferris Jul 1951 A
2570465 Lundholm Oct 1951 A
2699774 Livingston Jan 1955 A
2787186 Brogiotti Apr 1957 A
2817339 Sullivan Dec 1957 A
2890734 Mullin Jun 1959 A
3143916 Rice Aug 1964 A
3420929 Morin Jan 1969 A
3575080 Hannay Apr 1971 A
3579831 Stevens May 1971 A
3584667 Reiland Jun 1971 A
3664400 Moore May 1972 A
3716058 Tanner, Jr. Feb 1973 A
3768635 Eggert Oct 1973 A
3842825 Wagner Oct 1974 A
3861269 Laverty Jan 1975 A
3910281 Kletschka et al. Oct 1975 A
3910282 Messer et al. Oct 1975 A
3951261 Mandel et al. Apr 1976 A
3990438 Pritchard Nov 1976 A
4006657 Dunnette Feb 1977 A
4006747 Kronenthal et al. Feb 1977 A
4013071 Rosenberg Mar 1977 A
4041939 Hall Aug 1977 A
4114508 Jeal Sep 1978 A
4135623 Thyen Jan 1979 A
4175555 Herbert Nov 1979 A
4222689 Fujiwara Sep 1980 A
4241638 Shimizu et al. Dec 1980 A
4244370 Furlow et al. Jan 1981 A
4250674 Feist Feb 1981 A
4275717 Bolesky Jun 1981 A
4289124 Zickel Sep 1981 A
4301551 Dore et al. Nov 1981 A
4329099 Shimizu et al. May 1982 A
4351069 Ballintyn et al. Sep 1982 A
4406623 Grafelmann et al. Sep 1983 A
4419029 Wenzel Dec 1983 A
4424898 Thyen et al. Jan 1984 A
4454875 Pratt et al. Jun 1984 A
4467478 Jurgutis Aug 1984 A
4468200 Munch Aug 1984 A
4483023 Hoffman, Jr. et al. Nov 1984 A
4507817 Staffeld Apr 1985 A
4519100 Wills et al. May 1985 A
4520511 Gianezio et al. Jun 1985 A
4537185 Stednitz Aug 1985 A
4539981 Tunc Sep 1985 A
4569338 Edwards Feb 1986 A
4590928 Hunt et al. May 1986 A
4597776 Ullman et al. Jul 1986 A
4601625 Ernst et al. Jul 1986 A
4605414 Czajka Aug 1986 A
4611580 Wu Sep 1986 A
4632100 Somers et al. Dec 1986 A
4633869 Schmieding Jan 1987 A
4640271 Lower Feb 1987 A
4672957 Hourahane Jun 1987 A
4693654 Bettini Sep 1987 A
4712542 Daniel et al. Dec 1987 A
4723541 Reese Feb 1988 A
4738255 Goble et al. Apr 1988 A
4741330 Hayhurst May 1988 A
4750492 Jacobs Jun 1988 A
4756653 Berger Jul 1988 A
4784126 Hourahane Nov 1988 A
4815467 Chestnut Mar 1989 A
4870957 Goble et al. Oct 1989 A
4892429 Giannuzzi Jan 1990 A
4898156 Gatturna et al. Feb 1990 A
4946467 Ohi et al. Aug 1990 A
4946468 Li Aug 1990 A
4963144 Huene Oct 1990 A
4976715 Bays et al. Dec 1990 A
4978350 Wagenknecht Dec 1990 A
4988351 Paulos et al. Jan 1991 A
5002550 Li Mar 1991 A
5002563 Pyka et al. Mar 1991 A
5019079 Ross May 1991 A
5037422 Hayhurst et al. Aug 1991 A
5041129 Hayhurst et al. Aug 1991 A
5047030 Draenert Sep 1991 A
5059077 Schmid Oct 1991 A
5059201 Asnis Oct 1991 A
5061181 Niznick Oct 1991 A
5067956 Buford, III et al. Nov 1991 A
5074790 Bauer Dec 1991 A
5084050 Draenert Jan 1992 A
5087201 Mondani et al. Feb 1992 A
5100417 Cerier et al. Mar 1992 A
5100471 Winnik et al. Mar 1992 A
5102414 Kirsch Apr 1992 A
5102421 Anspach, Jr. Apr 1992 A
5108397 White Apr 1992 A
5116178 Lerman et al. May 1992 A
5120171 Lasner Jun 1992 A
5120172 Wakai Jun 1992 A
5129901 Decoste Jul 1992 A
5139499 Small et al. Aug 1992 A
5139520 Rosenberg Aug 1992 A
5141520 Goble et al. Aug 1992 A
D330591 Rosenberg et al. Oct 1992 S
5152790 Rosenberg et al. Oct 1992 A
5156616 Meadows et al. Oct 1992 A
5163960 Bonutti Nov 1992 A
D331463 Rosenberg et al. Dec 1992 S
5176682 Chow Jan 1993 A
5180382 Frigg et al. Jan 1993 A
5205746 Chanavaz Apr 1993 A
5207679 Li May 1993 A
5211647 Schmieding May 1993 A
5217486 Rice et al. Jun 1993 A
5224946 Hayhurst et al. Jul 1993 A
5236445 Hayhurst et al. Aug 1993 A
5242447 Borzone Sep 1993 A
5246369 Poulmaire Sep 1993 A
5246441 Ross et al. Sep 1993 A
5250055 Moore et al. Oct 1993 A
5258016 DiPoto et al. Nov 1993 A
5261914 Warren Nov 1993 A
5268001 Nicholson et al. Dec 1993 A
5275176 Chandler Jan 1994 A
5285016 Narizuka et al. Feb 1994 A
5306290 Martins et al. Apr 1994 A
5312412 Whipple May 1994 A
5312438 Johnson May 1994 A
5320626 Schmieding Jun 1994 A
5324308 Pierce Jun 1994 A
5326205 Anspach, Jr. et al. Jul 1994 A
5327896 Schmieding Jul 1994 A
5330468 Burkhart Jul 1994 A
5334204 Clewett et al. Aug 1994 A
5336240 Metzler et al. Aug 1994 A
5350383 Schmieding et al. Sep 1994 A
5354298 Lee et al. Oct 1994 A
5356413 Martins et al. Oct 1994 A
5356435 Thein Oct 1994 A
5360448 Thramann Nov 1994 A
5364400 Rego, Jr. et al. Nov 1994 A
5370661 Branch Dec 1994 A
5370662 Stone et al. Dec 1994 A
5375956 Pennig Dec 1994 A
5376119 Zimmermann et al. Dec 1994 A
5380334 Torrie et al. Jan 1995 A
5383905 Golds et al. Jan 1995 A
D357534 Hayes Apr 1995 S
5403136 Mathys Apr 1995 A
5411506 Goble et al. May 1995 A
5411523 Goble May 1995 A
5414966 Montoya May 1995 A
5417533 Lasner May 1995 A
5417691 Hayhurst May 1995 A
5417712 Whittaker et al. May 1995 A
D359557 Hayes Jun 1995 S
5423860 Lizardi et al. Jun 1995 A
5441502 Bartlett Aug 1995 A
5441508 Gazielly et al. Aug 1995 A
5443482 Stone et al. Aug 1995 A
5447401 Jones et al. Sep 1995 A
5451225 Ross, Jr. et al. Sep 1995 A
5456267 Stark Oct 1995 A
5456685 Huebner Oct 1995 A
5458602 Goble et al. Oct 1995 A
5458608 Wortich Oct 1995 A
5462644 Woodson Oct 1995 A
5464425 Skiba Nov 1995 A
5464427 Curtis et al. Nov 1995 A
5466243 Schmieding et al. Nov 1995 A
5470334 Ross et al. Nov 1995 A
5480403 Lee et al. Jan 1996 A
5486197 Le et al. Jan 1996 A
5489210 Hanosh Feb 1996 A
5492442 Lasner Feb 1996 A
5496326 Johnson Mar 1996 A
5501695 Anspach, Jr. et al. Mar 1996 A
5501696 Trott Mar 1996 A
5505735 Li Apr 1996 A
5505736 Reimels et al. Apr 1996 A
5520692 Ferrante May 1996 A
5522843 Zang Jun 1996 A
5522844 Johnson Jun 1996 A
5522845 Wenstrom, Jr. Jun 1996 A
5527342 Pietrzak et al. Jun 1996 A
5531748 de la Caffiniere Jul 1996 A
5534001 Schlapfer et al. Jul 1996 A
5534011 Greene, Jr. et al. Jul 1996 A
5534031 Matsuzaki et al. Jul 1996 A
5540718 Bartlett Jul 1996 A
5545180 Le et al. Aug 1996 A
5549617 Green et al. Aug 1996 A
5549677 Durr et al. Aug 1996 A
5556428 Shah Sep 1996 A
5562664 Durlacher et al. Oct 1996 A
5562672 Huebner et al. Oct 1996 A
5562689 Green et al. Oct 1996 A
5569305 Bonutti Oct 1996 A
5569306 Thal Oct 1996 A
5571139 Jenkins, Jr. et al. Nov 1996 A
5573547 LeVeen et al. Nov 1996 A
5573548 Nazre et al. Nov 1996 A
5575801 Habermeyer et al. Nov 1996 A
5575819 Amis Nov 1996 A
5578057 Wenstrom, Jr. Nov 1996 A
5584695 Lal Sachdeva et al. Dec 1996 A
5584835 Greenfield Dec 1996 A
5584836 Ballintyn et al. Dec 1996 A
5584839 Gieringer Dec 1996 A
5584860 Goble et al. Dec 1996 A
5591207 Coleman Jan 1997 A
5593410 Vrespa Jan 1997 A
5593425 Bonutti et al. Jan 1997 A
5601557 Hayhurst Feb 1997 A
5601558 Torrie et al. Feb 1997 A
5607432 Fucci Mar 1997 A
5618314 Harwin et al. Apr 1997 A
5624446 Harryman, II Apr 1997 A
5626612 Bartlett May 1997 A
5626613 Schmieding May 1997 A
5628766 Johnson May 1997 A
5630814 Ross, Jr. et al. May 1997 A
5630815 Pohl et al. May 1997 A
5634926 Jobe Jun 1997 A
5637112 Moore et al. Jun 1997 A
5642996 Mochida et al. Jul 1997 A
5643269 Harle Jul 1997 A
5643273 Clark Jul 1997 A
5643320 Lower et al. Jul 1997 A
5643321 McDevitt Jul 1997 A
5645545 Bryant Jul 1997 A
5645547 Coleman Jul 1997 A
5645589 Li Jul 1997 A
5647874 Hayhurst Jul 1997 A
5649963 McDevitt Jul 1997 A
5658313 Thal Aug 1997 A
5662658 Wenstrom, Jr. Sep 1997 A
5665112 Thal Sep 1997 A
5667509 Westin Sep 1997 A
D385352 Bales et al. Oct 1997 S
5676665 Bryan Oct 1997 A
5681318 Pennig et al. Oct 1997 A
5681333 Burkhart et al. Oct 1997 A
5683401 Schmieding et al. Nov 1997 A
5683418 Luscombe et al. Nov 1997 A
5683419 Thal Nov 1997 A
5685313 Mayevsky Nov 1997 A
5690649 Li Nov 1997 A
5690676 DiPoto et al. Nov 1997 A
5690677 Schmieding et al. Nov 1997 A
5693060 Martin Dec 1997 A
5694783 Bartlett Dec 1997 A
5697950 Fucci et al. Dec 1997 A
5702397 Goble et al. Dec 1997 A
5702398 Tarabishy Dec 1997 A
5702422 Stone Dec 1997 A
5703687 Kumagai et al. Dec 1997 A
5707373 Sevrain et al. Jan 1998 A
5707394 Miller et al. Jan 1998 A
5709708 Thal Jan 1998 A
5713900 Benzel et al. Feb 1998 A
5720765 Thal Feb 1998 A
5720766 Zang et al. Feb 1998 A
5725529 Nicholson et al. Mar 1998 A
5725541 Anspach, III et al. Mar 1998 A
5728136 Thal Mar 1998 A
5733307 Dinsdale Mar 1998 A
5738685 Halm et al. Apr 1998 A
5741259 Chan Apr 1998 A
5741300 Li Apr 1998 A
5743914 Skiba Apr 1998 A
5747712 Goto May 1998 A
5749878 Bracy et al. May 1998 A
5755542 Janusz et al. May 1998 A
5755721 Hearn May 1998 A
5766221 Benderev et al. Jun 1998 A
5778623 Powell Jul 1998 A
5782864 Lizardi Jul 1998 A
5782865 Grotz Jul 1998 A
5782866 Wenstrom, Jr. Jul 1998 A
5792142 Galitzer Aug 1998 A
5797914 Leibinger Aug 1998 A
5797963 McDevitt Aug 1998 A
5800433 Benzel et al. Sep 1998 A
5800447 Wenstrom, Jr. Sep 1998 A
5807396 Raveh Sep 1998 A
5808217 Liao Sep 1998 A
5810824 Chan Sep 1998 A
5810854 Beach Sep 1998 A
5814051 Wenstrom, Jr. Sep 1998 A
5814070 Borzone et al. Sep 1998 A
5814071 McDevitt et al. Sep 1998 A
5816812 Kownacki et al. Oct 1998 A
5824011 Stone et al. Oct 1998 A
5827291 Fucci et al. Oct 1998 A
5843082 Yuan et al. Dec 1998 A
5843087 Jensen et al. Dec 1998 A
5843127 Li Dec 1998 A
5851219 Goble et al. Dec 1998 A
5860978 McDevitt et al. Jan 1999 A
5860983 Wenstrom, Jr. Jan 1999 A
5865559 Yang Feb 1999 A
5868749 Reed Feb 1999 A
5868762 Cragg et al. Feb 1999 A
5868789 Huebner Feb 1999 A
5879372 Bartlett Mar 1999 A
5885294 Pedlick et al. Mar 1999 A
5891146 Simon et al. Apr 1999 A
5891168 Thal Apr 1999 A
5893850 Cachia Apr 1999 A
5899920 DeSatnick et al. May 1999 A
5902321 Caspari et al. May 1999 A
5904704 Goble et al. May 1999 A
5911721 Nicholson et al. Jun 1999 A
5925048 Ahmad et al. Jul 1999 A
5931844 Thompson et al. Aug 1999 A
5935129 McDevitt et al. Aug 1999 A
5944739 Zlock et al. Aug 1999 A
5948000 Larsen et al. Sep 1999 A
5948001 Larsen Sep 1999 A
5951559 Burkhart Sep 1999 A
5957953 DiPoto et al. Sep 1999 A
5961538 Pedlick et al. Oct 1999 A
5964764 West, Jr. et al. Oct 1999 A
5964783 Grafton et al. Oct 1999 A
5968044 Nicholson et al. Oct 1999 A
5968078 Grotz Oct 1999 A
5980558 Wiley Nov 1999 A
5989028 Niznick Nov 1999 A
5993451 Burkhart Nov 1999 A
5993459 Larsen et al. Nov 1999 A
5997541 Schenk Dec 1999 A
6007567 Bonutti Dec 1999 A
6013077 Harwin Jan 2000 A
6013083 Bennett Jan 2000 A
6015252 Peck Jan 2000 A
6019768 Wenstrom, Jr. et al. Feb 2000 A
6022373 Li Feb 2000 A
6024758 Thal Feb 2000 A
6027523 Schmieding Feb 2000 A
6030162 Huebner Feb 2000 A
6036694 Goble et al. Mar 2000 A
6042583 Thompson et al. Mar 2000 A
6045554 Grooms et al. Apr 2000 A
6045573 Wenstrom, Jr. et al. Apr 2000 A
6045574 Thal Apr 2000 A
6056751 Fenton, Jr. May 2000 A
6077267 Huene Jun 2000 A
6086365 Fields Jul 2000 A
6086608 Ek et al. Jul 2000 A
6090110 Metz-Stavenhagen Jul 2000 A
6096041 Gellman et al. Aug 2000 A
6099547 Gellman et al. Aug 2000 A
6117161 Li et al. Sep 2000 A
6117162 Schmieding et al. Sep 2000 A
6129762 Li Oct 2000 A
6143017 Thal Nov 2000 A
6149669 Li Nov 2000 A
6156039 Thal Dec 2000 A
6159235 Kim Dec 2000 A
6162234 Freedland et al. Dec 2000 A
6183479 Tormala et al. Feb 2001 B1
6200329 Fung et al. Mar 2001 B1
6214031 Schmieding Apr 2001 B1
6221107 Steiner et al. Apr 2001 B1
6231592 Bonutti et al. May 2001 B1
6231606 Graf et al. May 2001 B1
6280474 Cassidy et al. Aug 2001 B1
6287324 Yarnitsky et al. Sep 2001 B1
6319270 Grafton et al. Nov 2001 B1
6319271 Schwartz et al. Nov 2001 B1
6355053 Li Mar 2002 B1
6368322 Luks et al. Apr 2002 B1
6387129 Rieser et al. May 2002 B2
6436124 Anderson et al. Aug 2002 B1
6436142 Paes et al. Aug 2002 B1
RE37963 Thal Jan 2003 E
6508830 Steiner Jan 2003 B2
6511499 Schmieding et al. Jan 2003 B2
6517542 Papay et al. Feb 2003 B1
6517564 Grafton et al. Feb 2003 B1
6520980 Foerster Feb 2003 B1
6524317 Ritchart et al. Feb 2003 B1
6527772 Enayati Mar 2003 B2
6527794 McDevitt Mar 2003 B1
6527795 Lizardi Mar 2003 B1
6544281 ElAttrache et al. Apr 2003 B2
6551330 Bain et al. Apr 2003 B1
6558389 Clark et al. May 2003 B2
6562044 Cooper May 2003 B1
6585730 Foerster Jul 2003 B1
6610080 Morgan Aug 2003 B2
6616665 Grafton et al. Sep 2003 B2
6629977 Wolf Oct 2003 B1
6635074 Bartlett Oct 2003 B2
6641596 Lizardi Nov 2003 B1
6641597 Burkhart et al. Nov 2003 B2
6648903 Pierson, III Nov 2003 B1
6652561 Tran Nov 2003 B1
6652563 Dreyfuss Nov 2003 B2
6656183 Colleran et al. Dec 2003 B2
6660008 Foerster et al. Dec 2003 B1
6666877 Morgan et al. Dec 2003 B2
6685728 Sinnott et al. Feb 2004 B2
6692516 West, Jr. et al. Feb 2004 B2
6699250 Osterle et al. Mar 2004 B1
6716234 Grafton Apr 2004 B2
6770076 Foerster Aug 2004 B2
6770084 Bain et al. Aug 2004 B1
6773450 Leung et al. Aug 2004 B2
6780198 Gregoire et al. Aug 2004 B1
6818010 Eichhorn et al. Nov 2004 B2
6840953 Martinek Jan 2005 B2
6857520 Salazar et al. Feb 2005 B2
6875216 Wolf Apr 2005 B2
6916333 Schmieding et al. Jul 2005 B2
6923824 Morgan et al. Aug 2005 B2
6932834 Lizardi et al. Aug 2005 B2
6981974 Berger Jan 2006 B2
7037324 Martinek May 2006 B2
7083638 Foerster Aug 2006 B2
7083683 Schneidereit et al. Aug 2006 B2
7090690 Foerster et al. Aug 2006 B2
7195634 Schmieding et al. Mar 2007 B2
7204839 Dreyfuss et al. Apr 2007 B2
7211088 Grafton et al. May 2007 B2
7217279 Reese May 2007 B2
7247164 Ritchart et al. Jul 2007 B1
7322978 West, Jr. Jan 2008 B2
7322986 Wolf Jan 2008 B2
7329272 Burkhart et al. Feb 2008 B2
7491217 Hendren et al. Feb 2009 B1
7517357 Abrams et al. Apr 2009 B2
7556640 Foerster Jul 2009 B2
7637949 Hart Dec 2009 B2
7651495 McDevitt et al. Jan 2010 B2
7695495 Dreyfuss Apr 2010 B2
7785347 Harvie et al. Aug 2010 B2
7803173 Burkhart et al. Sep 2010 B2
7883528 Grafton et al. Feb 2011 B2
7883529 Sinnott et al. Feb 2011 B2
7887551 Bojarski et al. Feb 2011 B2
7965494 Morris et al. Jun 2011 B1
7981140 Burkhart Jul 2011 B2
7993369 Dreyfuss Aug 2011 B2
8105343 White et al. Jan 2012 B2
8133258 Foerster et al. Mar 2012 B2
8137381 Foerster et al. Mar 2012 B2
8317829 Foerster et al. Nov 2012 B2
8343186 Dreyfuss et al. Jan 2013 B2
8444672 Foerster May 2013 B2
8623052 Dreyfuss et al. Jan 2014 B2
8764797 Dreyfuss et al. Jul 2014 B2
8801755 Dreyfuss et al. Aug 2014 B2
8821541 Dreyfuss et al. Sep 2014 B2
9179907 ElAttrache et al. Nov 2015 B2
9521999 Dreyfuss Dec 2016 B2
10595847 Dreyfuss Mar 2020 B2
20010002439 Bonutti et al. May 2001 A1
20010014814 Bonutti et al. Aug 2001 A1
20010018613 Huene Aug 2001 A1
20010021862 Bonutti et al. Sep 2001 A1
20020013608 ElAttrache et al. Jan 2002 A1
20020052629 Morgan et al. May 2002 A1
20020087190 Benavitz et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020111653 Foerster Aug 2002 A1
20020128684 Foerster Sep 2002 A1
20020147463 Martinek Oct 2002 A1
20020188305 Foerster et al. Dec 2002 A1
20030004545 Burkhart et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030065361 Dreyfuss Apr 2003 A1
20030069604 Schmieding et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030144696 Sinnott et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030149448 Foerster et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030187444 Overaker et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030191498 Foerster et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030195563 Foerster Oct 2003 A1
20030204193 Gabriel et al. Oct 2003 A1
20040030354 Leung et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040093031 Burkhart et al. May 2004 A1
20040106950 Grafton et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040133239 Singhatat Jul 2004 A1
20040138683 Shelton et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040138706 Abrams et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040267316 Powell et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050107828 Reese May 2005 A1
20050222618 Dreyfuss et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050245932 Fanton et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050277985 Wert et al. Dec 2005 A1
20050277986 Foerster et al. Dec 2005 A1
20050283156 Schmieding et al. Dec 2005 A1
20050283158 West, Jr. Dec 2005 A1
20060004364 Green et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060074434 Wenstrom, Jr. et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060079904 Thal Apr 2006 A1
20060100630 West, Jr. May 2006 A1
20060271060 Gordon Nov 2006 A1
20070142838 Jordan Jun 2007 A1
20070156148 Fanton et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070156149 Fanton et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070156150 Fanton et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070156176 Fanton et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070191849 ElAttrache et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070225719 Stone et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070255317 Fanton et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070260259 Fanton et al. Nov 2007 A1
20080004659 Burkhart et al. Jan 2008 A1
20090187216 Schmieding et al. Jul 2009 A1
20110015674 Howard et al. Jan 2011 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (33)
Number Date Country
2045903 Jun 1991 CA
0465910 Jan 1992 EP
0574707 Dec 1993 EP
0598219 May 1994 EP
0465910 Nov 1995 EP
0686373 Dec 1995 EP
0687446 Dec 1995 EP
0699420 Mar 1996 EP
0835640 Apr 1998 EP
0951869 Oct 1999 EP
1016377 Jul 2000 EP
1530951 May 2005 EP
1762186 Mar 2007 EP
1797826 Dec 2009 EP
2588332 Apr 1987 FR
2622430 Oct 1987 FR
2717070 Sep 1995 FR
2725615 Apr 1996 FR
2738737 Mar 1997 FR
651009 Mar 1951 GB
7717562 Oct 1977 GM
1034734 Aug 1983 SU
1600713 Oct 1990 SU
9428811 Dec 1994 WO
9522930 Aug 1995 WO
9614798 May 1996 WO
9641574 Dec 1996 WO
9826717 Jun 1998 WO
9937217 Jul 1999 WO
9953844 Oct 1999 WO
0110312 Feb 2001 WO
0221998 Mar 2002 WO
2009055075 Apr 2009 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (199)
Entry
Hand-drawn Diagram Showing Cortical Layer. Slocum, Apr. 27, 2017. Slocum Exhibit 7 from Smith & Nephew v. Arthrex, Case IPR 2016-00918.
Figure 2 diagram. Slocum, Apr. 27, 2017. Slocum Exhibit 8 from Smith & Nephew v. Arthrex, Case IPR 2016-00918.
Figure 1 Diagram. Slocum, Apr. 27, 2017. Slocum Exhibit 9 from Smith & Nephew v. Arthrex, Case IPR 2016-00918.
Figure 3 Diagram. Slocum, Apr. 27, 2017. Slocum Exhibit 10 from Smith & Nephew v. Arthrex, Case IPR 2016-00918.
Screenshot of file list from Exhibit 1173. Arthrex Exhibit 2045, Smith & Nephew v. Arthrex. Case IPR2016-00918.
Rotated view of screw cross section with female and male configuration from Exhibit 1173. Arthrex Exhibit 2046, Smith & Nephew v. Arthrex Case IPR2016-00918.
Screenshot of file list from Exhibit 1174. Arthrex Exhibit 2047. Smith & Nephew v. Arthrex Case IPR2016-00918.
Image of PDF “drivers in hexagons 0.36 mmslot.PDF” Arthrex Exhibit 2048. Smith & Nephew v. Arthrex. Case PR2016-00918.
Annotated screenshot of file “drivers in hexagons.SLDASM” from exhibit 1174. Arthrex Exhibit 2049. Smith & Nephew v. Arthrex Case IPR2016-00918.
Rotated view of “drivers in hexagons.SLDASM” from exhibit 1174. Arthrex Exhibit 2050. Smith & Nephew v. Arthrex Case IPR2016-00918.
Transcript of Deposition of Alexander H. Slocum Ph.D., Smith & Nephew, Inc., et al., v. Arthrex, Inc., May 17, 2017, Boston, MA.
“Patent Owner's Oral Argument for Claims 10 and 11 of U.S. Pat. No. 8,821,541” Arthrex Exhibit 2053. Smith & Nephew v. Arthrex Case IPR2016-00918.
510(k) Summary of Safety and Effectiveness, DePuy Inc, Feb. 6, 1997.
Abrams, Jeffrey S., et al., Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Surgery, A Practical Approach to Management, 2008.
Arthrex is Reaching New Heights in Rotator Cuff Repair, Arthrex, Inc., 2007.
Barber, M.D., F. Alan, Biodegradable Shoulder Anchors Have Unique Modes of Failure, Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery, vol. 23, No. 3 Mar. 2007, pp. 316-320.
Barber, M.D., F. Alan et al., Biomechanical Analysis of Pullout Strength of Rotator Cuff and Glenoid Anchors: 2011 Update, Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery, vol. 27, No. 7 Jul. 2011; pp. 895-905.
Barber, M.D., F. Alan et al., The In Vivo Histology of an Absorbable Suture Anchor: A Preliminary Report, Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery, vol. 11, No. 1 Feb. 1995, pp. 77-81.
Barber, M.D., F. Alan et al., Suture Anchor Failure Strength—An In Vivo Study, Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery, vol. 9, No. 6, 1993., pp. 647-652.
Barber, M.D., F. Alan et al., Suture Anchor Strength Revisited, Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery, vol. 12, No. 1 Feb. 1996: pp. 32-38.
Barber, M.D., F. Alan et al., Suture Anchors—Update 1999, Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery, vol. 15, No. 7, Oct. 1999: pp. 719-725.
Barber, M.D., F. Alan et al., The Ultimate Strength of Suture Anchors, Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery, vol. 11, No. 1 Feb. 1995: pp. 21-28.
Barber, M.D., F. Alan et al., Sutures and Suture Anchors: Update 2003, Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery, vol. 19, No. 9 Nov. 2003: pp. 985-990.
Barber, M.D., F. Alan et al., Sutures and Suture Anchors: Update 2006, Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery, vol. 22, No. 10 Oct. 2006: pp. 1063-1069.
Barber, M.D., F. Alan et al., Suture Anchor Materials, Eyelets, and Designs: Update 2008, Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery, vol. 24, No. 8 Aug. 2008: pp. 859-867.
Bioknotless™ Anchor, The First Absorbable Knotless Suture Anchor, Mitek® Products, 2001.
Burkhart, Stephen S. et al., Chapter 4, Current Concepts of Rotator Cuff Repair, pp. 81-88.
Burkhart M.D., Stephen S. et al., Cyclic Loading of Anchor-Based Rotator Cuff Repairs: Confirmation of the Tension Overload Phenomenon and Comparison of Suture Anchor Fixation With Transosseous Fixation, Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery, vol. 13, No. 6 Dec. 1997: pp. 720-724.
Burkhart, M.D., Stephen S., The Deadman Theory of Suture Anchors: Observations Along a South Texas Fence Line, Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery, vol. 11, No. 1 Feb. 1995: pp. 119-123.
Burkhart M.D., Stephen S., Partial Repair of Irreparable Rotator Cuff Tears, Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery, vol. 10, No. 4, 1994, pp. 363-370.
Burkhart M.D., Stephen S., SLAP Lesions in Association with Complete Tears of the Long Head of the Biceps Tendon: A Report of Two Cases, Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery, vol. 8, No. 1, 1992, pp. 31-35.
Craft M.D., David V et al., Fixation strength of rotator cuff repairs with suture anchors and the transosseous suture technique, Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees, 1996, pp. 32-40.
Denard, M.D., Patrick J., The Evolution of Suture Anchors in Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair, Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery, vol. 29, No. 9 Sep. 2013: pp. 1589-1595.
Gerber, Christian et al., Mechanical Strength of Repairs of the Rotator Cuff, The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, vol. 76-B, No. 3, May 1994, pp. 371-380.
Harryman, II, M.D., Douglas T., Repairs of the Rotator Cuff, Correlation of Functional Results with Integrity of the Cuff, The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, vol. 73-A, No. 7, Aug. 1991, pp. 982-989.
Hecker, Aaron T. et al., Pull-out strength of suture anchors for rotator cuff and Bankart lesion repairs, The American Journal of Sports Medicine, vol. 21, No. 6, 1993, pp. 874-879.
Johnson, MD, FRCS, Donald H. et al., Chapter 20: Thermal Treatment, Sutures, Knots, and Bone Anchors, Practical Orthopaedic Sports Medicine and Arthroscopy, 2007, pp. 303-305.
Lovald Ph.D, Scott et al., Chapter 15: Applications and Polyetheretherketone in Trauma, Arthroscopy, and Cranial Defect Repair, Peek Biomaterials Handbook, 2012, pp. 243-260.
Ma, Richard et al., Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: suture anchor properties, modes of failure and technical considerations, Expert Rev. Med. Devices 8(3), 2011, pp. 377-387.
Meyer, M.D., Dominik C., Failure of Suture Material at Suture Anchor Eyelets, Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery, vol. 18, No. 9 Nov.-Dec. 2002: pp. 1013-1019.
Millstein, M.D., Eric S. et al., Instructional Course 302: Arthroscopic Management of Partial, Full-Thickness, and Complex Rotator Cuff Tears: Indications, Techniques, and Complications, Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery, vol. 19, No. 10 (Dec. 2003, Suppl 1): pp. 189-199.
Ono, Ichiro et al., Evaluation of a high density polyethylene fixing system for hydroxyapatite ceramic implants, Biomaterials 21 (2000), pp. 143-151.
Pietschmann, M.D., Matthias F., Biomechanical Stability of Knotless Suture Anchors Used in Rotator Cuff Repair in Healthy and Osteopenic Bone, Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery, vol. 26, No. 8 Aug. 2010: pp. 1035-1044.
Reed, Stephen C., Full Thickness Rotator Cuff Tears, A Biomechanical Comparison of Suture Versus Bone Anchor Techniques, The American Journal of Sports Medicine, vol. 24, No. 1, 1996: pp. 46-48.
Richmond, John C., Modification of the Bankart reconstruction with a suture anchor, Report of a new technique, The American Journal of Sports Medicine, vol. 19, No. 4, 1991: pp. 343-346.
Rupp, M.D., Stefan, Fatigue Testing of Suture Anchors, The American Journal of Sports Medicine, vol. 30, No. 2, 2002, pp. 239-247.
Snyder, M.D., Stephen J., Technique of Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair Using Implantable 4-MM REVO Suture Anchors, Suture Shuttle Relays, and No. 2 Nonabsorbable Mattress Sutures, The Rotator Cuff, Part II, Orthopedic Clinics of North America, vol. 28, No. 2, Apr. 1997, pp. 267-275.
Weideman, Ph.D., Carol A., 510(k) Summary of Safety and Effectiveness, Mar. 21, 1997.
Wolf, M.D., Eugene M., Arthroscopic Bankart Repair Using Suture Anchors, Operative Techniques in Orthopaedics, vol. 1, No. 2 Apr. 1991: pp. 184-191.
Wolf, M.D., Eugene M., Arthroscopic Capsulolabral Repair Using Suture Anchors, Shoulder Arthroscopy and Related Surgery, Orthopedic Clinics of North America, vol. 24, No. 1, Jan. 1993, pp. 59-69.
510(K) Summary for Arthrex, Inc.'s Bio-Interference Screw, Jul. 9, 1997.
Ahmad MD, Christopher S., Arthroscopic biceps tenodesis, Orthopedi Clinics of North America, 2003, pp. 499-506.
An Absorbable Interference Screw . . . the difference is Acufex, Acufex, Smith & Nephew Endoscopy, 1995.
Arthrex Corkscrew™ Suture Anchors, 1996.
Arthrex Surgical Techniques, https://web.archive.org/web/19981206111626/http://www.arthrex.com/Procedures.htm; Dec. 6, 1998.
Welcome to Arthrex, https://web.archive.org/web/19981111190428/http://www.arthrex.com/; Nov. 11, 1998.
Bach, Jr. M.D., Bernard R., Observations on Interference Screw Morphologies, Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery, vol. 16, No. 5 Jul.-Aug. 2000: E10, pp. 1-6.
Barber, M.D., F. Alan et al., Preliminary Results of an Absorbably Interference Screw, Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery, vol. 11, No. 5 Oct. 1995: pp. 537-548.
Bellemans, M.D.,Ph.D, Johan, A Modified Technique for Tibial Interference Screw Fixation of Hamstring Anterior Cruciate Ligament Grafts, Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery, vol. 15, No. 6 Sep. 1999: pp. 669-671.
Benterud, Jan G. et al., Implant holding power of the femoral head, Acta Orthop Scand 119; 63(1): pp. 47-49.
Caborn, M.D., David N. M. et al., Quadrupled Semitendinosus-Gracilis Autograft Fixation in the Femoral Tunnel: A Comparison Between a Metal and a Bioabsorbably Interference Screw, Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery, vol. 14, No. 3 Apr. 1998: pp. 241-245.
Chapman, J.R. et al., Factors Affecting the Pullout Strength of Cancellous Bone Screws, Journal of Biomechanical Enginnering, Aug. 1996, vol. 11, pp. 391-398.
Corry, MD, FRCS(Orth), Ian S. et al., Arthroscopic Reconstruction of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament, The American Journal of Sports Medicine, vol. 27, No. 3, 1999, pp. 444-454.
The products you Need . . . The convenience you want . . . and the value you deserve., Acufex Microsurgical, Inc., 1994.
Lambert, M.D., Kenneth L., Vascularized Patellar Tendon Graft with Rigid Internal Fixation for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Insufficiency, Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, Jan.-Feb. 1983, pp. 85-89.
Lo, MD, Ian K.Y. et al., Arthroscopic Biceps Tenodesis: Indications and Technique, Operative Techniques in Sports Medicine, vol. 10, No. 2 Apr. 2002: pp. 105-112.
Mazzocca, MD, A.D. et al., Single Incision Technique Using an Interference Screw for the Repair of Distal Biceps Tendon Ruptures, Operative Techniques in Sports Medicine, vol. 11, No. 1 Jan. 2003: pp. 36-41.
Pearls of Wisdom, https://web.archive.org/web/19981201194509/http://www.arthrex.com/pearls.htm, Dec. 1, 1998.
Perren, SM et al., Technical and biomechanical aspects of screws used for bone surgery, International Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma 1992; 2: pp. 31-48.
Rehnberg, Lars et al., Uppsala Screw Fixation Versus the von Bahr Technique in Displaced Cervical Hip Fractures: Preliminary Report, Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma, vol. 3, No. 1, 1989, pp. 48-52.
Richards, MD, David P. et al., Arthroscopic Biceps Tenodesis with Interference Screw Fixation: The Lateral Decubitus Position, Operative Techniques in Sports Medicine, vol. 11, No. 1 Jan. 2003; pp. 15-23.
Rupp, MD, Stefan et al., Fixation Strength of a Biodegradable Interference Screw and a Press-Fit Technique in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With a BPTB Graft, Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery, vol. 13, No. 1 Feb. 1997: pp. 61-65.
Caborn, M.D., David et al., Arthroscopic Repair of a Bankart Lesion Using TAG® Suture Anchors, Smith & Nephew Endoscopy, 1996.
Smith & Nephew, 1997 Products Catalog.
Tencer, Allen F. et al., Biomechanics of Cannulated and Noncannulated Screws, Cannulated Screw Fixation, 1996, pp. 15-40.
Mcguire, MD, David A., The BioScrew® Fixation System, Linvatec, 1995.
Uhl, MD, Richard L., The Biomechanice of Screws, Orthopaedic Review, vol. XVIII, No. 12, Dec. 1989, pp. 1302-1307.
Using the T-Fix, Acufex Microsurgical, Inc., 1995.
Von Bahr, Viktor et al., Osteosynthesis of Femoral Neck Fracture Using Screws, Acta Chir Scand 140; pp. 277-282, 1974.
Weiler, MD, Andreas et al., Biodegradable Interference Screw Fixation Exhibits Pull-Out Force and Stiffness Similar to Titanium Screws*, The American Journal of Sports Medicine, vol. 26, No. 1, 1998, pp. 119-128.
Weiler, MD, Andreas et al., Hamstring Tendon Fixation Using Interference Screws: A Biomechanical Study in Calf Tibial Bone, Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery, vol. 14, No. 1 Jan.-Feb. 1998: pp. 29-37.
510(K) Summary for Arthrex, Inc.'s FASTak Suture Anchor, Apr. 18, 1996.
Stadelmaier, DO, Denise M. et al., “Cyclic Pull-Out Strength of Hamstring Tendon Graft Fixation with Soft Tissue Interference Screws” The American Journal of Sports Medicine, vol. 27, No. 6, 1999, pp. 778-783.
Kurosaka, MD, Masahiro et al., “A biomechanical comparison of different surgical techniques of graft fixation in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction” The American Journal of Sports Medicine, vol. 15, No. 3, 1987, pp. 225-229.
U.S. Food and Drug Administration Guidance: Use of International Standard ISO-10993, ‘Biological Evaluation of Medical Devices Part 1: Evaluation and Testing’, 1995.
Hayes, “Biomechanics of Cortical and Trabecular Bone: Implications for Assessment of Fracture Risk,” Basic Orthopaedic Biomechanics, pp. 93-142 (1991).
Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 8,343,186, filed in the United States Patent and Trademark Office on Jan. 27, 2016, Case No. IPR2016-00505.
Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 8,623,052, filed in the United States Patent and Trademark Office on Jan. 27, 2016, Case No. IPR2016-00506.
Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 8,801,755, filed in the United States Patent and Trademark Office on Jan. 27, 2016, Case No. IPR2016-00507.
Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 8,801,755, filed in the United States Patent and Trademark Office on Jan. 27, 2016, Case No. IPR2016-00508.
Defendants' Invalidity Contentions and Production of Documents Pursuant to Patent Rules 3-3 and 3-4(B), Arthrex, Inc. v. Smith & Nephew, Inc. and Arthrocare Corp., Civil Action No. 2:15-CV-1047-RSP; filed Nov. 18, 2015.
Corkscrew Product Sheet from Arthrex Catalog 1998-1999.
Oberg et al., “Screw Threads” Machinery's Handbook: A Reference Book for the Mechanical Engineer, Manufacturing Engineer, Draftsman, Toolmaker, and Machinist, pp. 1633, Industrial Press Inc., New York, NY (1996).
Goradia, M.D., Vipool K. et al., “Cyclic Loading of Rotator Cuff Repairs: A Comparison of Bioabsorbable Tacks With Metal Suture Anchors and Transosseous Sutures” Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery, vol. 17, No. 4 Apr. 2001: pp. 360-364.
Goble, M.D., E. Marlowe, “The Development of Suture Anchors for Use in Soft Tissue Fixation to Bone” The American Journal of Sports Medicine, vol. 22, No. 2, 1994.
Lajtai, G. et al., Shoulder Arthroscopy and MRI Techniques, 2003.
Asnis et al., “Cancellous Bone Screw Design and Holding Power,” 62nd Annual Meeting of American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, pp. 465-466 (Feb. 1995).
Decoster, Thomas A. et al., “Optimizing Bone Screw Pullout Force,” Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma, vol. 4, No. 2, pp. 169-174, 1990.
Orthopedics, Feb. 1997, vol. 20, No. 2, pp. 160, 174 and 182.
Goble, E. Marlowe et al., The Development of Suture Anchors for Use in Soft Tissue Fixation to Bone, The American Journal of Sports Medicine, vol. 22, No. 2, 1994, pp. 236-239.
Chang, D.P.M., Thomas J., Soft Tissue Anchors: An Update, Chapter 50, pp. 301-305.
Labral Repair with Statak® Suture Anchors, Surgical Techniques, Arthroscopic & Open, Zimmer, 97-2344-03, 1996.
Statak™ Soft Tissue Attachment Device Technique Guide, Surgical Techniques, Common Foot Procedures, Zimmer, 97-2344-58 Rev. 1, 1995.
Rotator Cuff Repair with Statak® Suture Anchors Technique Guide, Surgical Techniques, Arthroscopic & Open, Zimmer, 97-2344-04, 1996.
Pederson, DPM, Bradley et al., Mitek® Anchor System: A New Technique for Tenodesis and Ligamentous Repair of the Foot and Ankle, The Journal of Foot Surgery, vol. 30, No. 1, 1991, pp. 48-51.
Yu, DPM, Gerard V. et al., Soft Tissue Anchors, 1992, pp. 120-125.
IMF Screw Set for Intermaxillary Fixation, Synthes® Maxillofacial, 2001.
Stryker Leibinger, IMF Screw System for Intermaxillary Fixation Brochure.
Arthur, DMD, Gregory et al., A Simplified Technique of Maxillomandibular Fixation, American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons, 1989, p. 1234.
Busch, M.D., D.D.S, Richard F., Maxillomandibular Fixation Utilizing Cortical Bone Screws, Correspondence and Brief Communications, p. 262.
Karlis, D.M.D., Vasiliki et al., Reply, Plastic and Reconsdtructive Surgery, Apr. 1998, p. 1414.
Karlis, D.M.D, Vasiliki et al., An Alternative to Arch-Bar Maxillomandibular Fixation, Ideas and Innovations, vol. 99, No. 6, 1996, pp. 1758-1759.
Martin FAMI Screws Brochure.
Mondeal IMF Quick-Fix System Brochure.
“The AutoCuff™ System,” Opus Medical, 2003.
Apreleva, Ph.D. et al., Maria, Rotator Cuff Tears: The Effect of the Reconstruction Method on Three-Dimensional Repair Site Area, Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery, vol. 18, No. 5 May-Jun. 2002: pp. 519-526.
George, MD, Michael S. et al., Suture Anchors in Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair, Operative Techniques in Sports Medicine, 2004, pp. 210-214.
Millett, MD, Peter J., Mattress Double Anchor Footprint Repair: A Novel, Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair Technique, Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery, vol. 20, No. 8 Oct. 2004: pp. 875-879.
Robbe, MD, Rudy et al., Knotless Suture-Based Anchors, Operative Techniques in Sports Medicine, 2004, pp. 221-224.
Thal, MD, Raymond, Knotless Suture Anchor, Arthroscopic Bankart Repair Without Tying Knots, Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, No. 390, 2001, pp. 42-51.
Waltrip, Robert L., Rotator Cuff Repair: A Biomechanical Comparison of Three Techniques, The American Journal of Sports Medicine, vol. 31, No. 4, 2003., pp. 493-497.
Yian, M.D., Edward et al., Arthroscopic Repair of SLAP Lesions With a Bioknotless Suture Anchor, Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery, vol. 20, No. 5, May-Jun. 2004: pp. 547-551.
Zumstein, M.D., Matthias, In Vitro Comparison of Standard and Knotless Metal Suture Anchors, Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery, vol. 20, No. 5 May-Jun. 2004: pp. 517-520.
Judgment—Granting Request for Adverse Judgment Before Institution of Trial 37 C.F.R. § 42.73(b) dated Sep. 21, 2016, Case IPR2016-00917, from the United States Patent and Trademark Office.
Decision—Granting Institution of Inter Partes Review 37 C.F.R. § 42.108 dated Oct. 17, 2016, Case IPR2016-00918, from the United States Patent and Trademark Office.
Decision—Institution of Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 8,343,186 dated Jul. 27, 2016, Case IPR2016-00505, from the United States Patent and Trademark Office.
Decision—Institution of Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 8,623,052 dated Aug. 2, 2016, Case IPR2016-00506, from the United States Patent and Trademark Office.
Decision—Institution of Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 8,801,755 dated Jul. 27, 2016, Case IPR2016-00507, from the United States Patent and Trademark Office.
Decision—Institution of Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 8,801,755 dated Jul. 27, 2016, Case IPR2016-00508, from the United States Patent and Trademark Office.
Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 8,821,541, filed in the United States Patent and Trademark Office on Apr. 19, 2016, Case No. IPR2016-00918.
Petition for Inter Partes Review of U.S. Pat. No. 8,821,541, filed in the United States Patent and Trademark Office on Apr. 19, 2016, Case No. IPR2016-00917.
European Search Report for EP Application No. 05102676.3 dated Aug. 29, 2005.
“Bone Screw Technical Information,” Richards Manufacturing Company, Inc. Tech. Publ. 1980, pp. 1-14.
“Implants for Surgery-Metal Bone Screws With Hexagonal Drive Connection, Spherical Under-Surface of Head, Asymmetrical Thread-Dimensions,” International Standard ISO 5834, 1991(E), pp. 1-10.
Linvatec Revo Cancellous Screw Advertisement, 1993.
R.M. Altieri Mitek Surgical Products announces fourth-quarter and year-end results, Business Wire (Feb. 24, 1995).
Rupp et al., “Fatigue Testing of Suture Anchors,” The American Journal of Sports Medicine, Mar. 2002, vol. 30, No. 2, pp. 239-247.
Laws, “Suturing Techniques,” Principles of Laparoscopic Surgery, 1995, pp. 35-45.
File History of U.S. Pat. No. 8,821,541.
Declaration of Mark A. Ritchart. In re U.S. Pat. No. 8,821,541, Claims 10 and 11. Executed Apr. 19, 2016. pp. 1-158.
CV of Mark A. Ritchart, 951-551-0162. pp. 1-3.
Dreyfuss, Utility Patent Application Transmittal for U.S. Appl. No. 11/097,568, Fully Threaded Suture Anchor With Transverse Anchor Pin, pp. 1-29.
Dreyfuss, Utility Patent Application Transmittal for U.S. Appl. No. 10/083,568, Fully Threaded Suture Anchor with Transverse Anchor Pin, pp. 1-29.
Grafton et al., Utility Patent Application Transmittal for U.S. Appl. No. 09/495,816, Bioabsorbable Tissue Tack With Oval-Shaped Head and Method of Tissue Fixation Using Same, p. 1-9.
Dreyfuss, Utility Patent Application Transmittal for U.S. Appl. No. 11/224,060, Fully-Threaded Bioabsorbable Suture Anchor, pp. 1-51.
Provisional Application for Patent Cover Sheet for U.S. Appl. No. 60/271,414, filed Feb. 27, 2001, pp. 1-7.
Provisional Application for Patent Cover Sheet for U.S. Appl. No. 60/118,228, filed Feb. 2, 1999, pp. 1-11.
Provisional Application for Patent Cover Sheet for U.S. Appl. No. 60/125,781, filed Mar. 23, 1999, pp. 1-15.
Provisional Application for Patent Cover Sheet for U.S. Appl. No. 60/715,614, filed Sep. 12, 2005, pp. 1-10.
The American Heritage College Dictionary, Third Edition, 2000, pp. 227, 956, 998.
Appendix B. Exhibit 120 to “Plaintiff Arthrex, Inc.'s Disclosures of Asserted Claims and Infringement Contentions as to Defendants Smith & Nephew, Inc., and Arthrocare Corp., and Identification of Document Production Accompanying Disclosure,” Civil Action No. 2:15-CV-1047-JRG (E.D. Tex.).
Declaration of Nathan R. Speed in Support of Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice, May 31, 2016.
Arthrex “About Us” webpage, 2016.
Erin Carlyle, Meet Reinhold Schmieding, the Florida Medical Device Billionaire You've Never Heard of, Forbes.com LLC, Aug. 6, 2013, pp. 1-3.
Random House Webster's College Dictionary, Second Edition, 1999. p. 154-155, 210-211, 252-253, 350-351, 363, 382-383, 494-497, 680-681, 686-687, 778-779, 782-783, 824-825, 882-883, 964-965, 1064-1065, 1134-1135, 1296, 1312-1313.
The American Heritage College Dictionary, Fourth Edition, May 24, 2004, pp. 174-175.
Erin Mckean, The New Oxford American Dictionary, Second Edition, May 17, 2005, pp. 876.
John Mccormick, ArthroCare Closes Opus Medical Acquisition, HealthPointCapital, Nov. 22, 2004, New York, NY, pp. 1-3.
Arthrocare Corporation, et al., Agreement and Plan of Merger Sep. 3, 2004, pp. 1-85.
Maurice Waite, et al., Oxford Paperback Dictionary and Thesaurus, Third Edition, 2009, pp. 966.
Erik Oberg, et al., Machinery's Handbook, 24th Edition, Industrial Press Inc., New York, 1992, pp. 1524.
Declaration of Ken Gall, PhD, Smith & Nephew, Inc., et al., v. Arthrex, Inc., Case No. IPR2016-00918, U.S. Pat. No. 8,821,541, Jan. 14, 2017, pp. 1-184.
Deposition of Mark A. Ritchart, Smith & Nephew, Inc., et al., v. Arthrex, Inc., Case No. IPR2016-00918, U.S. Pat. No. 8,821,541, Nov. 29, 2016.
Reporter's Transcript of Jury Trial, Arthrex, Inc. v. Smith & Nephew, et al., Dec. 6, 2016, vol. 3, pp. 441-776.
Arthrex Covered Products Chart. https://www.arthrex.com/products/AR-1927PSF-45.
Copying Products Charts and Supporting Materials. Arthrex Exhibit 2014 from Smith & Nephew V. Arthrex, Case IPR 2016-00918.
510(k) Summary, 510(k) No. K110781, ArthroCare Corporation Spartan PEEK Suture Implant System, May 27, 2011.
Ervin, Corinne. “AthroCare received FDA Clearance for Spartan 6.5 Needled Suture Implant.” Business Wire. Jun. 6, 2011.
Cayenne Medical, Inc., Cayenne Medical Launches Quattro Shoulder System for Rotator Cuff and Labral Repair, Jul. 10, 2012, Scottsdale, Arizona, pp. 1-3.
510(k) Summary, 510(k) No. K101100, ConMed Linvatec CrossFT BC Suture Anchor, Aug. 26, 2010.
510(k) Summary, Section 2, 510(k) No. K082282, Healix Ti Anchor, Nov. 7, 2018.
510(k) Premarket Notification, 510(k) No. K120942, FDA, Silver Spring, MD, pp. 1-2.
510(k) Summary of Safety and Effectiveness, 510(k) No. K100159. Smith & Nephew Twinfix Ultra PK Suture Anchor. Apr. 19, 2010.
510(k) Summary of Safety and Effectiveness, 510(k) No. K083268. Tornier Insite. Feb. 12, 2009.
Arthrocare Corp. Speed Screw figures. Arthrex Exhibit 2023 from Smith & Nephew v. Arthrex, Case IPR 2016-00918.
Declaration of Christopher A. Vellturo, Ph.D., Jan. 13, 2017, pp. 1-18. (Unredacted).
Declaration of Christopher A. Vellturo, Ph.D., Jan. 13, 2017, pp. 1-18. Redacted.
Modified Protective Order—Redlines Relative to Board's Standing Protective Order. Smith & Nephew, Inc., et al, v. Arthrex, Inc., Case No. IPR2016-00918, U.S. Pat. No. 8,821,541, pp. 1-9.
Modified Protective Order—Clean. Smith & Nephew, Inc., et al, v. Arthrex, Inc., Case No. IPR2016-00918, U.S. Pat. No. 8,821,541, pp. 1-9.
Declaration of Christopher Holter, Jan. 13, 2017, pp. 1-11. Redacted.
Declaration of Christopher Holter, Jan. 13, 2017, pp. 1-11. Unredacted.
Roy S. Payne, Judgment, Arthrex, Inc. v. Smith & Nephew, Inc., et al., Case No. 2:15-cv-01047-RSP, Document No. 299, Dec. 12, 2016.
Declaration of Jessica Zilberberg, Smith & Nephew, Inc., et al., v. Arthrex, Inc., Case No. IPR2016-00918, U.S. Pat. No. 8,821,541, Jan. 13, 2017.
Kathryn E. Smith, et al., Use of 3D Printed Bone Plate in Novel Technique to Surgically Correct Hallux Valgus Deformities, Techniques of Orthopedics, vol. 00, No. 00, 2016., pp. 1-9.
Atlas of Stress-Strain Curves, Second Edition, The materials Information Society, 2002.
CAD Diagram—Slocum, Apr. 27, 2017. Slocum Exhibit 4.
Handwritten Formula by Slocum. Apr. 27, 2017. Slocum Exhibit 5 from Smith & Nephew v. Arthrex, Case IPR 2016-00918.
Diagram Showing Cortical Layer by Slocum. Apr. 27, 2017. Slocum Exhibit 6 from Smith & Nephew v. Arthrex, Case IPR 2016-00918.
Bacilla M.D., Phillip, “Arthroscopic Bankart Repair in a High Demand Patient Population”, Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery, vol. 13, No. 1, Feb. 1997, pp. 51-60.
All Soft Tissue Anchors Are Not Created Equal . . . , Orthopaedic Biosystems Ltd., Inc., 1996.
M3-X Extremity Fixation System Just Drill and Drive, Osteomed Corporation, 1994.
Mitek GII Anchor™ System, Instrument Guide/Ordering Information, Mitek® Surgical Products, Inc., 1994.
Mitek GII Anchor™ System, Instrument Guide/Ordering Information, 1994.
Bradley M.D., James P., Labral Repair With Statak, Linvatec, 1994.
Your open techniques work . . . Let Our Arthroscopic Tools Work for You, Innovasive® Devices, Inc., 1995.
Snyder, M.D., Stephen, The Mini-Revo Labral Repair System, Linvatec, 1994.
Higgins, MD et al., Laurence D., Arthroscopic Bankart Repair, Operative Technique and Surgical Pitfalls, Clinics in Sports Medicine, vol. 19, No. 1, Jan. 2000, pp. 49-62.
Cole, MD, MBA et al., Brian J., Arthroscopic Shoulder Stabilization With Suture Anchors: Technique, Technology, and Pitfalls, Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, vol. 390, Sep. 2001, pp. 17-30.
Barber, M.D., F. Alan et al., Internal Fixation Strength of Suture Anchors—Update 1997, Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery, vol. 13, No. 3 Jun. 1997, pp. 355-362.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20200170635 A1 Jun 2020 US
Continuations (2)
Number Date Country
Parent 15382855 Dec 2016 US
Child 16784612 US
Parent 11224060 Sep 2005 US
Child 15382855 US