1. Field of the Invention
The invention relates to a fume extraction cabinet with a working chamber which is open on one side, and which is equipped with an exhaust.
2. Description of Related Art
Cabinets of the initially mentioned type are generally known and can are commercially available. They are subject to certain standards concerning a possible escape (blow-out) of harmful substances.
In this regard, it is known from published German Patent Application DE 19712975 A1 to increase the blow-out safety of a cabinet with a fume extraction working chamber by means of an air curtain which is blown upwards across the opening of the working chamber from the lower side. Although it is thus possible to improve the blow-out safety against disturbances from the exterior, it is not possible to prevent heavy gases, for example, from accumulating at the bottom of the working chamber or light gases from accumulating above the opening of the working space.
The problem underlying the invention lies in the fact that a fume extraction cabinet with a working chamber of the type mentioned at the outset is designed in such a way that an accumulation of harmful substances at the side walls and the bottom of the working chamber in the housing is avoided.
This problem is solved according to the invention by devices arranged at the open side of the working space, which emit fresh air jets into the interior of the working chamber at an acute angle to the internal surface of the chamber side walls and bottom surface.
A particularly preferred embodiment of the invention is described in greater detail below with the aid of the accompanying drawings.
The fume extraction cabinet shown in
The side posts of housing 1 of the cabinet are designed as aluminium posts 8 formed for flow-technology purposes, preferably as a profiled part in the manner of an aircraft wing with a leading face pointing forwards, whereby sliding window 9 has an inflow profiled part 10 correspondingly formed for flow-technology purposes. The leading edge of table plate 2 also have an inflow profile 11 formed for flow-technology purposes, which can similarly be a profiled part in the manner of an aircraft wing with a leading face pointing forwards/outwards.
Above the cabinet there is arranged an supply-air pipe 12, from which supply air is blown into the exhaust, i.e., into working chamber 3. This supply air can originate from the external space or from an owner air-supply network. The amounts of air blown in, regulated by a regulator 13 which comprises a differential-pressure or flow sensor, a regulating butterfly valve, a motor and a central electronic control unit, are blown into a distribution collecting channel 14 and introduced into working chamber 3 through a supply air nozzle 15, which is formed by a chamber which is bounded by surface parts 16 and 16a. In the lower area of the chamber, which is formed in the manner of a nozzle, there are deflection profiles 17, which guide a free jet 18 inwards into working chamber 3 of the cabinet. The design of the supply air device is described below in detail with the aid of
As is further shown in
The profiled parts of side posts 8 are also designed in such a way that they emit supporting jets 21 into the housing interior, which are also blown at an acute angle relative to the internal surfaces of the side walls of the housing.
The devices for generating the additional air jets 21, 22 can be provided at a distance from the profile leading face or directly behind the profile leading face of profiled parts 8, 11.
In the lower area of this chamber, i.e., in the lower area of parts 16 and 16a, deflection profiles 17 are provided, which are designed such that the free jet from the nozzle is first bent and then deflected inwards, so that, together with the impetus of the air flowing in from the exterior, it flows inwards into working chamber 3 of the cabinet at an angle of 45° to the vertical. This supply air unites with the air flowing in from the exterior into working chamber 3.
a shows that inflowing air 30 fits against the inflow profile at the leading edge of table plate 2 but does not approach the table plate surface, so that a backflow zone 31 arises, into which air from the interior of working chamber 3 of the cabinet flows up to the breakaway edge and in which harmful substances are thus able to accumulate.
As is shown in
When blowing-out of the air jets at the table plate and at the two sides is switched on, wall friction can thus be largely eliminated, so that the air flows inwards over the whole area of working chamber 3 and disappears behind baffle wall 4.
Particularly when working with heavy gases, this design has the advantage that the latter sink to the surface of the table plate and disappear directly at lower extraction opening 5b of working chamber 3 via the flow portion directed backwards.
Fresh air also flows around the area of the profile of sliding window 9 due to the inflow of additional air as free jet 18 in the upper area of the cabinet at deflection part 17, so that air cannot escape at the upper edge of sliding window 9 either.
The combination of free jet 18 and wall and bottom jets 21, 22, respectively, thus generates an ideal flow configuration in the exhaust.
Possible ratings of the two side air jets 22 are such that the latter amount to around 15 to 20 m3/h. Lower air jet 21 has an air quantity of 10 m3/h per running metre. The air speed amounts to 2 m per second. The deflection angle of air jets 21, 22 is preferably around 20°, so that the latter flow to the internal surfaces in working chamber 3 at an acute angle. Upper free jet 18, at deflection profile 17, is not directed onto a wall, but is blown in the form of a free jet ahead of the space. Therefore, the upper free jet 18 requires a much higher air quantity of approx. 100 to 150 m3/h per running meter of cabinet width. A cabinet with a width of 1500 mm can therefore manage with a free jet of 150 m3/h and wall jets of approx. 50 to 60 m3/h.
Since such an cabinet can be operated with an air control, it requires 150 m3/h when the sliding window is closed. Preferably, the design is such that, when the sliding window is open, the cabinet sucks out 900 m3/h and all wall and supporting jets are generated.
When sliding window 9 is closed, free jet 18 is switched off at deflection profile 17, so that the cabinet air requirement can be lowered to approx. 150 m3/h when the sliding window is closed. Therefore, it is recommended to operate the cabinet with a control which measures the position of vertical sliding window 9. If vertical sliding window 9 opens by more than 50%, free jet 18 on deflection profile 17 is switched on. The same also applies when the horizontal sliding window of the cabinet is opened by more than 10 to 20 mm. Otherwise, free jet 18 is switched off.
In the case of a cabinet in the night-time operation, wall jets 21, 22 can also be switched off, so that the cabinet can always be operated with a small air quantity depending on the requirement situation, which represents a significant advantage compared with a conventional curtain exhaust. The cabinet air quantity then amounts to 100 m3/h.
Since the supporting jets have a considerable influence on the function of the working chamber, they must be constantly checked and monitored in the course of the necessary monitoring of the function of the cabinet from the air-engineering standpoint. This monitoring can be carried out with a differential pressure sensor in the overpressure area where blowing-in takes place. An alarm occurs in the event of a malfunction.
The example of embodiment of the cabinet according to the invention described above displays a high stability compared with a side or oblique flow, in that a dead-space area is prevented at the cabinet surfaces or at the cabinet slide gates. Furthermore, provision is made for very good extraction of heavy gases, since the latter sink to table plate 2 and are blown by additional air jet 22 into opening 5b. If light gases are being worked with in the working chamber, free jet 18, at deflection profile 17, ensures that light gases, which form in working chamber 3 at the top above this supporting jet 18, are reliably contained in the upper area of the cabinet and cannot contaminate the lower working area.
The design according to the invention, in which additional air jets 21, 22, 18 are generated, can be linked to the cabinet control in such a way that the cabinet can be operated with as small an air quantity as possible.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
101 46 000 | Sep 2001 | DE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP02/09141 | 8/14/2002 | WO | 00 | 3/5/2004 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO03/024631 | 3/27/2003 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2649727 | Snow et al. | Aug 1953 | A |
2702505 | Nelson | Feb 1955 | A |
3237548 | Bayern | Mar 1966 | A |
3496857 | Ellis et al. | Feb 1970 | A |
3747505 | Turko | Jul 1973 | A |
4280400 | Longworth | Jul 1981 | A |
4436022 | Zboralski et al. | Mar 1984 | A |
5042456 | Cote | Aug 1991 | A |
5167572 | Etkin | Dec 1992 | A |
5924920 | DeLuca et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
6089970 | Feustel | Jul 2000 | A |
6375562 | Hein | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6739967 | Saito et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
34 04 775 | Jul 1985 | DE |
34 31 669 | Mar 1986 | DE |
36 17 821 | Dec 1986 | DE |
41 15 602 | Oct 1992 | DE |
43 38 382 | May 1995 | DE |
44 19 268 | Dec 1995 | DE |
197 12 975 | Oct 1998 | DE |
200 17 731 | Mar 2001 | DE |
0 224 034 | Jun 1987 | EP |
0 337 469 | Oct 1989 | EP |
0 486 971 | May 1992 | EP |
0 867 665 | Sep 1998 | EP |
2 064 100 | Jun 1981 | GB |
2 161 261 | Jan 1986 | GB |
2 336 667 | Oct 1999 | GB |
8-131850 | May 1996 | JP |
9831481 | Jul 1998 | WO |
Entry |
---|
H. Hilbers, Schadluftabsperrung Durch Raumlufttechnische Systeme, Apr. 1990, pp. 63-68. |
Asecos, Sicherheit Und Umweltschutz, Apr. 2001, pp. 58-59, English IDS Statement of Relevance Attached. |
Allan Chen, Energy Efficient Berkeley Fume Hood Cuts Electircity Use in Half, Research News, Berkeley Lab, August 31, 2001, Three Pages. |
Allan Chen, Advanced Fume Hood Capable of Immense Savings in Energy Costs, Research News, Berkeley Lab, January 14, 2000, Three Pages. |
Geoffrey Bell, Dale Sartor, Evan Mills, High-Performance Laboratory Fume Hood Field Test At the University of California, San Francisco, Final Report for Pacific Gas and Electric Company, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Lbid-2396, Eetd-Applications Team, October 2001, 44 Pages. |
Helmut E. Feustel, Ph.D., Christoper Buchanan, Ph.D., Darryl J. Dickerhoff, Geoffrey C. Bell, Energy-Efficient Fume Hoods (Low-Flowfume Hoods), Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Indoor Environment Department, First Draft, 46 Pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20040242143 A1 | Dec 2004 | US |