Patent Grant
10017632
The present invention relates to functionalized graphene sheets having low oxygen content and methods for their preparation.
Thermally exfoliated graphite oxide (TEGO) (also known as functionalized graphene sheets) has been disclosed in US patent application publication US 2007/0092432; Schniepp, H. C. et al. J. Phys. Chem. B. 2006, 110, 8535-8539; McAllister, M. J. et al. Chem. Materials 2007 19, 4396-4404; and Kudin, N. K. et al. Nano Letters 2008, 8, 36-41, which are hereby incorporated by reference herein. Graphite oxide is formed by the treatment of graphite with oxidizing agents and intercalants or other oxidizing means and has a high oxygen content. During the thermal exfoliation of graphite oxide, oxygen functionalized sites on the graphite oxide decompose to evolve oxygen-containing gases that are liberated from the system, resulting in a thermally exfoliated graphite oxide that typically has a lower oxygen content on a molar basis than does the starting graphite oxide. The forgoing references disclose the formation of graphite oxide having carbon to oxygen molar ratios of between about 1.5:1 and 20:1.
However, in many applications, it would be desirable to obtain functionalized graphene sheets (FGS) having a higher carbon to oxygen ratio. For example, the amount of oxygen functional groups can affect the reactivity of the FGS with a polymer matrix when they are used as reinforcement fillers and/or affect nature of an adsorbed layer at the FGS interface; the presence of oxygen can be deleterious in certain applications; and the presence of oxygen-containing functional groups on the FGS can disrupt the pi-conjugated system, which can decrease the electrical conductivity of the material.
Disclosed and claimed here are functionalized graphene sheets having a carbon to oxygen molar ratio of at least about 23 to 1. Further disclosed and claimed herein are polymer composites or resins comprising functionalized graphene sheets having a carbon to oxygen molar ratio of at least about 23 to 1 and a method for making said functionalized graphene sheets.
As used herein, the term “carbon to oxygen ratio” refers to molar ratios of carbon to oxygen in the FGS. Carbon to oxygen ratio is determined by elemental analysis and the resulting weight ratios are converted to molar ratios.
The FGS (referred to herein as “high carbon to oxygen ratio functionalized graphene sheets”, or “FGS-HCO”) of the present invention have a carbon to oxygen ratio of at least about 23:1, or preferably at least about 25:1. In some embodiments of the invention, the carbon to oxygen ratio is at least about 28:1 or least about 35:1, or at least about 50:1, or at least about 75:1, or at least about 100:1, or at least about 200:1, or at least about 300:1, or at least about 400:1, or at least 500:1, or at least about 750:1, or at least about 1000:1, or at least about 1500:1, or at least about 2000:1.
The FGS-HCO of the present invention is formed by heating graphite oxide and/or FGS having lower carbon to oxygen ratios (for example, a ratio of not more than 20:1) at a temperature of at least about 750° C. under reducing atmospheric conditions (e.g., in systems purged with inert gases or hydrogen) for a time sufficient to react these starting materials to yield FGS-HCO. The heating process is referred to herein as “reduction.” The temperature used is preferably at least about 850° C., or more preferably at least about 950° C., or yet more preferably at least about 1000° C. The temperature used is preferably between about 750 about and 3000° C., or more preferably between about 850 and 2500° C., or yet more preferably between about 950 and about 2500° C. The time of heating is preferably at least about 2 minutes, or more preferably at least about 5 minutes. In some embodiments, the heating time will be at least about 15 minutes, or about 30 minutes, or about 45 minutes, or about 60 minutes, or about 90 minutes, or about 120 minutes, or about 150 minutes. During the course of heating, the temperature may vary within these ranges.
The heating may be done under a variety of conditions, including in an inert atmosphere (such as argon or nitrogen) or a reducing atmosphere, such as hydrogen (including hydrogen diluted in an inert gas such as argon or nitrogen), or under vacuum. The heating may be done in any appropriate vessel, such as a fused silica or a mineral or ceramic vessel or a metal vessel. The materials being heated (including any starting materials (i.e., graphite oxide and/or FGS-HCO) and any products or intermediates) may be contained in an essentially constant location in single batch reaction vessel, or may be transported through one or more vessels during the reaction in a continuous or batch reaction. Heating may be done using any suitable means, including the use of furnaces and infrared heaters. An example of an apparatus that can be used in the present invention is given in
Graphite oxide may be produced by any method known in the art, such as by a process that involves oxidation of graphite using one or more chemical oxidizing agents and, optionally, intercalating agents such as sulfuric acid. Examples of oxidizing agents include nitric acid, sodium and potassium nitrates, perchlorates, hydrogen peroxide, sodium and potassium permanganates, phosphorus pentoxide, bisulfites, and the like. Preferred oxidants include KClO4; HNO3 and KClO3; KMnO4 and/or NaMnO4; KMnO4 and NaNO3; K2S2O8 and P2O5 and KMnO4; KMNO4 and HNO3; and HNO3. A preferred intercalation agent includes sulfuric acid. Graphite may also be treated with intercalating agents and electrochemically oxidized.
In a preferred method, graphite is oxidized to graphite oxide, which is then thermally exfoliated to form high surface area FGS that is in the form of thermally exfoliated graphite oxide, as described in US 2007/0092432. The thusly formed FGS may display little or no signature corresponding to graphite or graphite oxide in its X-ray or electron diffraction patterns. Exfoliation, including the exfoliation of graphite oxide is preferably carried out at temperatures of at least 500° C. or more, preferably at temperatures of from 500 to 3000° C.
The FGS-HCO of the present invention preferably has a surface area of from about 250 to about 2630 m2/g. In some embodiments of the present invention, the FGS-HCO primarily, almost completely, or completely comprises fully exfoliated single sheets of graphite (often referred to as “graphene”), while in other embodiments, they may comprise partially exfoliated graphite sheets, in which two or more graphene layers have not been exfoliated from each other. The FGS-HCO may comprise mixtures of fully and partially exfoliated graphite sheets.
The surface area is more preferably from about 300 to about 2630 m2/g, or even more preferably from about 350 to about 2400 m2/g, or still more preferably of from about 400 to about 2400 m2/g, yet more preferably of from about 500 to about 2400 m2/g, or even more preferably of from about 800 to about 2400 m2/g. In another preferred embodiment, the surface area is about 300 to about 1100 m2/g. A single graphite sheet has a maximum calculated surface area of 2630 m2/g. The surface area includes all values and subvalues therebetween, especially including 400, 500, 600, 700, 800, 900, 100, 110, 1200, 1300, 1400, 1500, 1600, 1700, 1800, 1900, 2000, 2100, 2200, 2300, 2400, 2500, and 2630 m2/g.
Surface area can be measured using either the nitrogen adsorption/BET method or, preferably, a methylene blue (MB) dye method.
The dye method is carried out as follows: A known amount of FGS is added to a flask. At least 1.5 g of MB are then added to the flask per gram of FGS. Ethanol is added to the flask and the mixture is ultrasonicated for about fifteen minutes. The ethanol is then evaporated and a known quantity of water is added to the flask to re-dissolve the free MB. The undissolved material is allowed to settle, preferably by centrifuging the sample. The concentration of MB in solution is determined using a UV-vis spectrophotometer by measuring the absorption at λmax=298 nm relative to that of standard concentrations.
The difference between the amount of MB that was initially added and the amount present in solution as determined by UV-vis spectrophotometry is assumed to be the amount of MB that has been adsorbed onto the surface of the FGS. The surface area of the FGS is then calculated using a value of 2.54 m2 of surface covered per one mg of MB adsorbed.
The FGS-HCO preferably has a bulk density of from about 40 to about 0.1 kg/m3. The bulk density includes all values and subvalues therebetween, especially including 0.5, 1, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, and 35 kg/m3.
The FGS-HCO of the present invention may be used in a variety of applications. The FGS-HCO may be used alone (in the form of sheets, films, molded articles, etc.) or in combination (such as blends) with other components or in solids, suspensions, etc. For example, they may be used in conjunction with a binder to form coatings (including inks and paints) or films or with one or more polymeric materials to form composites or resins. The combinations may be in the form of coatings, printed materials, films, sheets, molded and extruded articles (including those formed from methods such as injection molding, blow molding, compression molding, ram extrusion, and the like) The FGS-HCO may be incorporated into the composites or resins using any suitable means including, but are not limited to, blending with the polymer (such as by melt compounding), mixing with thermosetting monomers prior to curing, or mixing with monomers that are then polymerized. The composites or resins can optionally contain additional components.
Polymeric materials can be thermosets, thermoplastics, non-melt processible polymers, and the like. Examples of polymers include acrylonitrile/butadiene/styrene (ABS), polycarbonates (PC), polyamides (including polyterephthalamides, polyesters (including poly(butylene terephthalate) (PBT), poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET), and the like), poly(phenylene oxide) (PPO), polysulphone (PSU), polyetherketone (PEK), polyetheretherketone (PEEK), polyimides, polyoxymethylene (POM), poly(lactic acid), poly(acrylonitrile), styrene/acrylonitrile polymers (SAN), polyetherimides, polystyrene (including high impact polystyrene), liquid crystalline polymers (LCPs), aramides (such as Kevlar® and Nomex®), polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE), fluorinated ethylene propylene polymers (FEP), poly(vinyl fluoride), poly(vinylidene fluoride), poly(vinylidene chloride), poly(vinyl chloride), polyolefins (such as polyethylene and polypropylene and olefin copolymers), poly(vinyl acetates), poly(methyl methacrylate) and other acrylate polymers, polysiloxanes (including polydimethylenesiloxane), elastomers (including, but not limited to, polyurethanes, copolyetheresters, rubbers (including butyl rubbers), styrene/butadiene copolymers, polyisoprene, natural rubber, and polysiloxanes, epoxy polymers, polyureas, alkyds, cellulosic polymers, polyethers (such as poly(ethylene oxides and poly(propylene oxides)), and the like.
In one embodiment of the present invention, when the FGS-HCO is used in blends with other materials, the composite material is electrically conductive and preferably has a conductivity of at least about 10−6 S/m. In an embodiment of the invention, when it is desirable that the composite materials be semiconductors, they preferably have a conductivity of about 10−6 S/m to about 105 S/m, or more preferably of about 10−5 S/m to about 105 S/m. In other embodiments of the invention, the coatings have conductivities of at least about 100 S/m, or at least about 1000 S/m, or at least about 104 S/m, or at least about 105 S/m, or at least about 106 S/m. In the case of materials where the FGS-HCO is blended with a binder or polymer (including when the blend is in a liquid form), the conductivities may be determined after the blends have been dried, cured, cross-linked or otherwise treated.
In some embodiments, the functionalized graphene sheets of the present invention have improved electrical conductivity both in pure form, and/or in blends or composites with other materials, than similar materials having lower carbon to oxygen ratios, including ratios of under 20:1.
Preparation of Graphite Oxide
Graphite oxide is prepared from graphite by treatment with sulfuric acid, nitric acid, and potassium chlorate according to the methods disclosed in Staudenmaier, L. Ber. Stsch. Chem. Ges, 1898, 31, 1481 and Schniepp, H. C. et al. J. Phys. Chem. B. 2006, 110, 8535-8539 (and its Supporting Information), and McAllister, M. J. et al. Chem. Materials 2007 19, 4396-4404.
Composite Conductivity Measurements
A poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO) solution is prepared by mixing a sufficient amount of PEO having a molecular weight of 4,000,000 with a 1:1 volume/volume mixture of ethanol and de-ionized water to produce a mixture containing 40 mg of PEO per mL of total solvent. After stirring overnight, a homogeneous PEO stock solution is obtained. In the case of the Examples and Comparative Examples in Tables 1 and 2, the PEO was obtained from Union Carbide Corp., while in the case of the Examples and Comparative Examples in Tables 3, it was obtained from Aldrich Chemicals.
The reduced samples from Tables 1-3 are weighed and a sufficient amount of concentrated aqueous Pluronic® F127 (an ethylene oxide/propylene oxide copolymer surfactant supplied by BASF) solution (typically 2 mg/mL) is added to the FGS to yield a mixture having a 1:1 weight ratio of reduced material and Pluronic F127. Sufficient de-ionized water is added to produce a suspension containing 1 mg FGS per 1 ml of water. The resulting suspension is sonicated for 5 minutes with a duty cycle of 20 percent in an ice bath. 1 mL of the reduced material suspension is then added to 3 mL of the PEO stock solution and the mixture is stirred for 3-5 minutes until homogeneous.
Two copper plates (22 mm×22 mm) are wrapped with Teflon tape, leaving 1 mm of copper uncovered at the lower ends. The plates are then firmly attached to the shorter of the side walls of a Teflon® cell (23 mm×46 mm inner base area, 32 mm height) with screws. The mixture is poured into the Teflon® cell and kept at 50° C. on a hot plate until all of the solvent is evaporated to form films that are attached to the copper plates. The resulting film contains 6.52 weight percent FGS, 6.52 weight percent Pluronic® F127, and 86.96 weight percent PEO, based on the total weight of FGS, Pluronic® F127, and PEO. The films are peeled off the cell by lifting the plates and are cut to rectangular shapes to exclude inhomogeneous (porous or thinner) regions. Final film lengths, widths, and thicknesses are in the ranges of about 10-32 mm, about 7-22 mm, and about 6-39 μm, respectively.
Copper tapes are attached parallel to each other on two ends of the film such that they cover the entire width of the film. A power supply (Tektronix PS 252G Programmable Power Supply, Tektronix Inc., Beaverton, Oreg.) and a multimeter (Fluke 27 Multimeter, Fluke Corp., Everett, Wash.) are attached in serial with the film via the copper tapes. A potential difference (5-20 V) is applied and current is monitored through the multimeter. An electrometer (Keithley 6514, Keithley Instruments Inc., Cleveland, Ohio) with two electrodes is used to measure the potential difference across two points along the direction of the current. The potential difference measured on the film and current is used to find the resistance using Ohm's law, i.e. R=V/I; where R, V, and I are the resistance, voltage, and current, respectively. Resistivity (σ) is found by σ=RA/L, where A and L are the cross section of the film through which current flows and the length over which the potential difference is measured. Conductivity (K) is found by K=1/σ. Two measurements are taken on different points of the film and the linear average is reported as the conductivity.
In each case except for Examples 5 and 11, two measurements are made and the results are averaged and given in Tables 1-3. In the cases of Examples 3 and 9, a single measurement is made and the results are reported in the tables.
Other Analytical Methods
C:O ratios are molar ratios determined from the results of elemental analysis. Surface area measurements are done using the BET method with the nitrogen adsorption technique.
Up to two steps are used in this method. In step I, the FGS is placed in an alumina boat and inserted into a 25 mm ID, 1.3 m long silica tube that was sealed at one end. The other end of the silica tube was closed using a rubber stopper. A gas inlet and thermocouple were inserted through the rubber stopper and the sample is flushed with a nitrogen/hydrogen gas mixture having a 95:5 molar ratio for 10 minutes, and then the tube is inserted into a tube furnace preheated to the temperatures indicated in Tables 1-3 and held for the period of time indicated in the tables.
In step II, the material (either FGS or the product of step I) is placed in an atmosphere of 100 mTorr of argon gas in a graphite furnace (Astro-1000, supplied by Thermal Technologies) for the times and temperatures indicated in Tables 2 and 3 (step II is not performed in the case of the experiments in Table 1). The material is heated to the desired temperature at a rate of 20° C./min and held at that temperature for the times indicated in the tables.
Graphite oxide (GO) is exfoliated (in experiments referred to as the “Exfol.” process in Table 4) using the apparatus shown in cross-sectional schematic form in
The graphite oxide is continuously carried by an argon stream through inlet 26 into tube 10 where it reacts, and the resulting exfoliated product exits through outlet 30 and is collected by filter 22. Opening 28 can also be used to introduce argon into or to apply a vacuum to the system.
The reduction experiments (referred to as the “Red.” process in Table 4) are run in two ways. Previously made FGS can then be passed through the tube again in a continuous manner similar to that used for the exfoliation, but with 4 mole percent hydrogen in argon as a carrier gas. Alternatively, graphite oxide or FGS are introduced into tube 10 via inlet 26 and held for a period of time (given under the heading “Holding time” in Table 4) without being allowed to exit through outlet 30 while tube 10 is continuously flushed with a 4 mole percent hydrogen in argon gas mixture. The hydrogen/argon mixture is introduced through inlet 26, and in some cases, though opening 28. The rates of gas flow through each opening for each example or comparative example are given in Table 4. In the case of Example 19, a vacuum was applied to the system through opening 28 and the hydrogen argon mixture was introduced through openings 26 and 30 with the flow rates indicated in Table 4. The carbon to oxygen ratios of the resulting products are determined by elemental analysis.
The GO starting material used comes from several batches, which are indicated in Table 4. In the case of Examples 20-22, the starting material is FGS prepared in Comparative Example 5; in the case of Example 24, the starting material is FGS prepared in Comparative Example 7; and in the case of Example 25, the starting material is FGS prepared in Comparative Example 8.
The present application is a Continuation of U.S. Ser. No. 12/866,306, filed Feb. 7, 2011, now allowed, which is a 371 of PCT/US09/32947, filed Feb. 3, 2009, which is a CIP of U.S. Provisional Ser. No. 61/026,264, filed Feb. 5, 2008.
This invention was made with Government support under Grant No. CMS-0609049, awarded by the National Science Foundation, and under Grant No. NCC1-02037, awarded by NASA. The Government has certain rights in the invention.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7658901 | Prud'Homme et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
| 7659350 | Prud'Homme et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
| 7745528 | Prud'Homme et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
| 7771824 | Herrera-Alonso et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
| 8449959 | Aksay et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
| 20070092432 | Prud'Homme et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070131915 | Stankovich et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20080302561 | Prud'Homme et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20080312368 | Prud'Homme et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20090048386 | Plee | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20090053433 | Prud'Homme et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20090053437 | Prud'Homme et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20090054272 | Prud'Homme et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20090054578 | Prud'Homme et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20090054581 | Prud'Homme et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20090123752 | Prud'Homme et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090123843 | Aksay et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090124746 | Handa | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090127514 | Korkut et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
| 20090233057 | Aksay et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
| 20100096595 | Prud'Homme et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20120145234 | Roy-Mayhew et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
| 20120237749 | Aksay et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
| 20120244333 | Aksay et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
| 20130302588 | Aksay et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
| 20150155404 | Roy-Mayhew et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
| 20150173188 | Prud'Homme et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 1793451 | Jun 2006 | CN |
| 2007-269545 | Oct 2007 | JP |
| WO 2007047084 | Apr 2007 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| Schniepp, H. C. et al., “Functionalized Single Graphene Sheets Derived From Splitting Graphite Oxide”. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, vol. 110, No. 17, pp. 8535-8539 (Apr. 11, 2006). |
| Stankovich, S. et al., “Synthesis of Graphene-Based nanosheets Via Chemical Rduction of Exfoliated Graphite Oxide”, Carbon, vol. 45, pp. 1558-1565 (Mar. 6, 2007). |
| Office Action dated Aug. 22, 2012, in Chinese Patent Application No. 200980109434.2. |
| Office Action dated Jul. 22, 2013, Chinese Patent Application No. 200980109434.2. |
| Office Action dated Sep. 3, 2013, in Japanese Patent Application No. 2010-545949. |
| Extended European Search Report dated Aug. 5, 2014 in Patent Application No. 09739294.8. |
| Supplementary European Search Report dated Aug. 22, 2014 in Patent Application No. 09739294.8. |
| Athanasios B. Bourlinos et al.. “Graphite Oxide: Chemical Reduction to Graphite and Surface Modification with Primary Aliphatic Amines and Amino Acids”, Langmuir, vol. 19, No. 15, XP—055131524, Jun. 25, 2003, pp. 6050-6055. |
| Kiang et al. (“Chemical reduction of graphene oxide: a synthetic chemistry viewpoint.” Chem Soc Rev, 43, pp. 291-312, 2014). |
| Office Action dated Oct. 23, 2016, in European Patent Application No. 0973924.8, filed Feb. 3, 2009. |
| Sandi G. Miller et al., “Interfacial Strength and Physical Properties of Functionalized Graphene—Epoxy Nanocomposites”, Global Advances in Materials and Process Engineering: Sampe Fall Technical Conference, XP-002657665, Nov. 6, 2006, 6 pages. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20170073504 A1 | Mar 2017 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 61026264 | Feb 2008 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 12866306 | US | |
| Child | 15362914 | US |
